EDITORIAL article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Primary Immunodeficiencies
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Research, Clinical Recognition, and Targeted Therapies for WHIM SyndromeView all 7 articles
Editorial: Advancing Research, Clinical Recognition, and Targeted Therapies for WHIM Syndrome
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Medicine Oldenburg, Oldeburg, Germany
- 2Division of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Medicine Oldenburg,, Oldenburg, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
WHIM syndrome, classically defined by warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis, has evolved from a clinicopathologic curiosity to a mechanistically tractable disorder at the crossroads of chemokine biology, leukocyte trafficking, and precision therapeutics. (1)(2)(3)(4) This Research Topic assembles six contributions that, taken together, refine the molecular framework of CXCR4 dysregulation, expand variant interpretation and clinical phenotyping, and provide preclinical evidence that informs current and future targeted therapy.A comprehensive review by Rodríguez-Frade and colleagues synthesizes the increasingly complex biology of CXCR4 mutations in WHIM syndrome. Beyond the canonical paradigm of C-terminal truncations that impair receptor phosphorylation, β-arrestin engagement, and ligand-induced internalization, the authors detail how mutant and wild-type CXCR4 differ in quaternary organization, membrane nanoclustering, and coupling to multiple G-protein pathways. These biophysical and signaling nuances help explain why distinct CXCR4 variants can converge on similar cellular phenotypes (enhanced CXCL12 responsiveness and bone-marrow retention) yet differ in immunologic expression across lineages and tissues. Importantly, the review connects mechanism to therapy, contextualizing the clinical activity of CXCR4 antagonists and highlighting emerging avenues such as gene editing as conceptually disease-modifying approaches. The bench-to-bedside arc of CXCR4 antagonism is delineated by two preclinical studies that interrogate distinct, clinically relevant contexts. Roland and colleagues examine chronic oral CXCR4 inhibition in Cxcr4^+/1013 WHIM knock-in mice. Treatment corrected pan-leukopenia without disrupting granulopoiesis, mobilized functionally competent neutrophils (preserved phagocytosis and oxidative burst), and progressively normalized secondary lymphoid organ architecture, restoring splenic CD8⁺ T-cell numbers and CD4/CD8 ratios, and rebalancing follicular and marginal zone B-cell compartments. These findings extend clinical observations with mavorixafor by providing mechanistic tissue-level correlates and by distinguishing pharmacologic profiles (e.g., longer-acting small molecules versus shorter-acting agents) that may be relevant to durability of immunologic correction. neutropenias driven by impaired CXCR2 signaling? Using a pharmacologic CXCR2 loss-of-function mouse model that recapitulates key patient features (peripheral neutropenia, bone marrow neutrophil retention with myelokathexis-like morphology, and increased susceptibility to pneumococcal pneumonia), the authors demonstrate that chronic CXCR4 antagonism normalizes circulating neutrophil counts, reverses bone marrow sequestration and reduces myelokathexis.Importantly, treatment also improves infection outcomes by restoring neutrophil recruitment to infected lung tissue and lowering bacterial burden and mortality. Together with preclinical and pharmacologic evidence that G-CSF-mediated neutrophil mobilization depends on intact CXCR2 signaling and may be attenuated when this pathway is impaired, these results rationalize clinical exploration of CXCR4 antagonists in CXCR2-deficient chronic neutropenia and in subsets where defective egress, rather than granulopoiesis, underlies cytopenia.Viewed as a whole, the collection advances three important themes in WHIM syndrome. First, at the level of mechanism, WHIM pathogenesis reflects graded, mutation-specific alterations in receptor regulation and network-level integration that map onto lineage-specific trafficking defects. This mechanistic pluralism might explain clinical variability and underscores why a single biomarker rarely captures disease activity across compartments.Second, in clinical recognition, both the V340fs family and the S341Y/NFKB1 pedigree emphasize that, the absence of the full tetrad does not exclude WHIM, CD8⁺ lymphopenia and specific B-cell subset alterations can be informative even with normal total Ig levels, and multilocus pathogenic variation can decisively shape phenotype. A practical implication is to pair early genetic testing with functional assays when variant classification is uncertain, and to maintain a low threshold for family studies and longitudinal immunophenotyping.Third, for targeted therapy, convergent preclinical evidence supports CXCR4 antagonism as a mechanism-directed approach that mobilizes effector cells without compromising core functions, with tissue-level benefits that extend beyond transient leukocytosis. The data also open testable hypotheses: optimizing dosing around time-above-threshold metrics for neutrophils and lymphocytes; studying HPV disease modification as a function of tissue trafficking; and evaluating CXCR4 blockade in WHIM-like neutropenias such as CXCR2 deficiency. Parallel progress in curative strategies (e.g., gene editing) warrants coordinated natural-history and outcomes registries to benchmark long-term safety and efficacy across modalities.In sum, this Research Topic integrates structural and signaling insights, refined diagnostic pathways, and rigorous preclinical pharmacology to move WHIM syndrome further into the realm of precision immunology.
Keywords: WHIM, CXCR4, CXCR2, CXCR4 antagonists, Primary immunodeficiency, leukocyte trafficking, precision medicine
Received: 07 Nov 2025; Accepted: 19 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Geier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Christoph B Geier, chgeier@icloud.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.