Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders: Autoinflammatory Disorders

This article is part of the Research TopicClinical and Immunological Phenotypic Characterization to better understand Pathogenesis and Response to Therapies in Systemic Autoimmune DiseasesView all 15 articles

Clinical, immunological characterisation and treatment response of patients with syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF) in Chinese children and adolescents: a single-centre cohort study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, National Center for Children's Health,Beijing Children's Hospital of Capital Medical University, BeiJing, China
  • 2Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing Children's Hospital of Capital Medical University, BeiJing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: SURF is a heterogeneous disorder characterised by recurrent fevers in the absence of a confirmed molecular diagnosis of HRF andPFAPA syndrome. The aim of this study is to characterise the clinical and immunological features of SURF patients. Methods: 191 patients were included. Fifty-seven patients met the criteria for SURF, 70 met the criteria for PFAPA and 64 met the criteria for FMF. Baseline data and blood samples were collected from patients at enrolment or at routine clinical visits. Clinical and immunological characteristics and cytokine levels were analysed. Results: In SURF patients, gastrointestinal symptoms were more prominent than in PFAPA patients. However, the difference in gastrointestinal symptoms between SURF patients and FMF patients was not significant. Pharyngitis and cervical adenitis were both seen in SURF and PFAPA patients while the frequency was higher in PFAPA patients. Family history was significantly higher in FMF patients than in SURF patients. On-demand steroids were more likely prescribed in PFAPA patients, while colchicine was more commonly prescribed in SURF patients. FMF patients were more commonly prescribed on-demand steroids than SURF patients. But SURF patients were more likely prescribed NSAIDs than FMF patients. The proportion of helper T cells (CD3+CD4+) was significantly lower in SURF patients compared to PFAPA patients. However, the proportion of natural killer cells (CD3-CD56+) was significantly higher in SURF patients compared to PFAPA patients. The proportion of cytotoxic T cells (CD3+CD8+) was significantly higher in FMF patients compared to SURF patients. But the proportion and absolute count of natural killer cells (NK cells) (CD3-CD56+) was significantly lower in FMF patients compared to SURF patients. SURF patients tended to have higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-α). Both SURF, PFAPA, and FMF patients showed favorable responses to colchicine treatment. Conclusion: This study describes the clinical and immunological characteristics of a large cohort of patients with SURF. This suggests us that SURF is a heterogenous disease. However, the clinical and immunological features and treatment options of SURF patients differ from PFAPA and FMF patients.

Keywords: Autoinflammation, Colchicine, FMF, PFAPA, SURF

Received: 11 Aug 2025; Accepted: 04 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Xiongbin, Wenlu, Yulu, Mengyang, Shu and Huawei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mao Huawei

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.