ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Primary Immunodeficiencies
This article is part of the Research TopicCommunity Series in Primary Immunodeficiencies Worldwide: Volume IIIView all 8 articles
Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Hereditary Angioedema in the Baltic States
Provisionally accepted- 1Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
- 2Paula Stradiņš Clinical University hospital, Center for Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Riga, Latvia
- 3Allergic Diseases Diagnosis and Treatment Centre, Riga, Latvia
- 4East Tallinn Central Hospital, Centre of Allergology and Immunology, Tallinn, Estonia
- 5Tartu University Hospital, Lung Clinic, Tartu, Estonia
- 6Centre of Primary Immunodeficiency, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- 7Centre of Primary Immunodeficiency, Department of Immunology and Allergology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- 8Vilnius University, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Vilnius, Lithuania
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, potentially life-threatening disorder characterised by recurrent episodes of localised oedema caused by bradykinin overproduction. Accurate epidemiological data are essential for optimising diagnosis and treatment, particularly in underrepresented regions such as the Baltic states. This study aimed to examine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, genetic variants, and treatment accessibility for patients with HAE in the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Methods: This retrospective study included HAE patients diagnosed according to the WAO/EAACI 2021 criteria between 2004 and 2024. Demographic, clinical, and genetic data were collected and evaluated. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi (version 2.3). Results: A total of 78 patients were identified in Estonia (n=30), Latvia (n=12) and Lithuania (n=36) from 2004 till 2024. In Lithuania, 7 patients had died and 3 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 26 patients remaining under active observation. While the total number of HAE cases identified across the three countries was reported, detailed clinical data and analyses were limited to the 68 patients who were alive and actively followed at the time of data collection. Estonia exhibited the highest point prevalence (2.19 per 100,000), while Latvia had the lowest (0.65). The median diagnostic delay was longest in Latvia (24 years) and shortest in Estonia (9.5 years). SERPING1 gene pathogenic variants predominated. Estonia had the broadest availability of treatments, whereas Latvia had restricted access to modern therapies. Conclusion: Considerable variation exists in HAE prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment across the Baltic states. Estonia exemplifies best practices, while Latvia remains underserved. Regional collaboration and standardised care protocols are urgently needed.
Keywords: diagnosis, Epidemiology, Estonia, hereditary angioedema, Latvia, Lithuania, Prevalence
Received: 31 Aug 2025; Accepted: 13 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Kurjane, Kanepa, Purina, Lapina, Ress, Savisaar, Bajoriuniene, Gasiuniene, Linauskiene, Chomičienė, Gradauskiene and Malinauskiene. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Natalja Kurjane
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
