Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 09 February 2026

Sec. Inflammation

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1714168

Zinc suppresses Stat3-driven IL-6 production in primary mouse adipocytes

Hak Chung,Hak Chung1,2John Eom,John Eom1,2Michelle SMA Damen,Michelle SMA Damen1,2Traci E. Stankiewicz,Traci E. Stankiewicz1,2Keisuke Sawada,,,Keisuke Sawada1,2,3,4Pablo C. Alarcon,,,Pablo C. Alarcon1,2,3,4Cassidy J. Ulanowicz,Cassidy J. Ulanowicz1,3Jennifer L. Wayland,,Jennifer L. Wayland1,3,4George S. Deepe Jr.George S. Deepe Jr.5Senad Divanovic,,,,*Senad Divanovic1,2,3,4,6*
  • 1Division of Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
  • 3Immunology Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
  • 4Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
  • 5Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
  • 6Center for Inflammation and Tolerance, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States

Uncontrolled inflammatory cytokine production promotes pathogenesis of various chronic diseases. Zinc (Zn) regulates immune cell inflammatory cytokine production. However, the influence of Zn on the inflammatory properties of non-immune cells known to contribute to disease pathogenesis is not well understood. Adipocytes respond to various immunological stimuli by activating inflammatory pathways and secreting inflammatory cytokines. Here, we investigated the impact of Zn on adipocyte inflammatory vigor. We show that treatment of primary mouse adipocytes with Zn, in the form of Zn pyrithione, restricted their toll-like receptor ligand-driven IL-6 production. Mechanistically, IL-6 secreted from adipocytes functions in an autocrine fashion to activate the Stat3 pathway and amplify IL-6 production via a positive feedback loop. Notably, Zn treatment of adipocytes suppressed Stat3 signaling activation to break the positive feedback loop and subsequent expression of IL-6 and its receptor genes (Il6st, Il6ra). Collectively, our findings uncover a novel inhibitory role for Zn in non-immune cell, specifically adipocyte, IL-6 production. These findings invoke a potential role of Zn in the regulation of adipocyte-associated chronic inflammation and disease pathogenesis.

1 Introduction

Inflammation is a multifaceted immunological process that is integral to the body’s defense mechanisms against injury and external threats. This natural and essential biological response is vital for providing protection from environmental challenges. Nevertheless, non-resolving or chronic inflammation can lead to numerous health complications, often serving as a common underlying factor in the pathogenesis of various diseases (1). Therefore, tight regulation of inflammation is required to mitigate unwanted disease states.

Chronic inflammation is often marked by an uncontrolled release of inflammatory cytokines, including Interleukin-6 (IL-6) (2). IL-6, a pleotropic cytokine produced by both immune and non-immune cell types, affects immune system homeostasis, hematopoiesis, inflammation, and metabolism (3, 4). Cellular sensing of IL-6 occurs through activation of the gp130 signal transducer, initiated by the binding of IL-6 to the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) present in either transmembrane or soluble forms (5). Chronic elevation in IL-6 is observed in multiple pathological conditions. In obesity, for example, systemic and local IL-6 is strongly associated with the development of metabolic disorders. In fact, IL-6 is recognized as an initiator of hepatocyte insulin resistance (6) and promoter of atherosclerosis (7). Further, IL-6 is essential for the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into Th17 cells (8) and sustaining pathogenic Th17 cell subset (9), both of which are considered primary culprits of obesity-associated liver inflammation (10, 11).

Among various non-immune cells, adipocytes are appreciated to produce large amounts of IL-6 (12). Adipocytes are traditionally viewed as energy storing cells due to their remarkable lipid storage capacity; however, their immune-like properties have recently been recognized (1214). Adipocytes express various immune receptors (e.g., toll-like receptors (TLRs), type I interferon receptor, etc.) and are capable of producing significant amounts of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 (15). In humans, up to 35% of basal circulating IL-6 originates from white adipose tissue (WAT), with both immune cells and adipocytes in WAT serving as major sources of IL-6 (16). Although debatable, a study reported that adipocyte-specific IL-6 knockout mice fed a high-fat diet had ~40% decrease in circulating IL-6 levels (17), invoking the potential impact of adipocyte-centric IL-6 production to disease pathogenesis.

Research efforts to elucidate the exact role of IL-6 in the development of metabolic disorders involving chronic inflammation, however, have revealed conflicting findings. In fact, a substantial body of evidence suggests beneficial metabolic roles of IL-6 (18) – whole-body IL-6 knockout mice develop obesity, liver inflammation and insulin resistance on standard chow diets (19), and skeletal muscle-derived IL-6 during exercise acts as an insulin sensitizer (20). IL-6 is also recognized for its ability to drive thermogenic programming and browning during adipocyte development (21). In addition, an anti-inflammatory role of IL-6 promoting M2-like polarization of adipose tissue macrophages (ATMs) has been reported (22). These contradictory findings demonstrate the complexity of IL-6 functions in chronic inflammation and suggest that IL-6 role is likely highly context-dependent. Importantly, Han et al. (17) revealed that the cellular origin of IL-6 is critical in determining its effects: myeloid cell-derived IL-6 suppresses M1-like macrophage polarization, limits ATM accumulation, and improves glucose and insulin tolerance, whereas adipocyte-derived IL-6 strongly promotes ATM accumulation and exacerbates high-fat diet-induced adipose tissue inflammation. These results highlight the potential of limiting adipocyte-specific IL-6 release for controlling chronic inflammation, and warrant further research into the regulation of adipocyte production of IL-6.

The immune system and its function are influenced by numerous factors, one of which is zinc (Zn). Zn is the second most prevalent transient metal in the human body. The Zn proteome comprises an estimated 3,000 proteins found in all six classes of enzymes, underscoring its significance in the overall cellular metabolism (23). Zn is indispensable for the proper functioning of cells, serving structural, catalytic, and signaling roles (24, 25). In the immune system, disrupted Zn homeostasis compromises both innate and adaptive immune responses and alters key immune functions such as chemotaxis, cell adhesion, phagocytosis, cytotoxicity, differentiation, proliferation, maturation, and cytokine and antibody production [reviewed in (26)]. Indeed, dysregulated Zn status is often observed in chronic inflammatory settings including arthritis, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus (27). In obesity, Zn deficiency is prevalent as well (28) and low Zn intake or serum levels correlate with increased levels of inflammatory cytokines (29, 30). Zn supplementation trials in this population report favorable effects such as weight loss (31) and improved insulin sensitivity (32, 33), along with decreased levels of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and IL-6 (34, 35). In addition, Zn supplementation decreased serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and CRP levels in children with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH; recently renamed as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, or MASH) (36), suggesting the potential of replenishing Zn in mitigating inflammation-driven pathologies (37).

Given the pivotal role of Zn in immune regulation, the immune-like properties of adipocytes, and disrupted Zn homeostasis in chronic inflammatory state, we hypothesized that Zn plays an important regulatory role in adipocyte inflammatory cytokine production. Thus, we focused our investigation on whether and how Zn modulates adipocyte IL-6 production. In this study, using primary wildtype (WT) mouse adipocytes isolated and differentiated from the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of inguinal WAT, we demonstrate that Zn pyrithione (ZnPT) treatment restricts TLR-driven IL-6 production in adipocytes. Mechanistically, ZnPT treatment was sufficient to suppress the expression of IL-6 receptors and inhibited Stat3 signaling without altering adipocyte viability. Further, we show that IL-6 produced by adipocytes operates in an autocrine fashion to activate the Stat3 pathway and amplify IL-6 production via positive feedback loop. Together, our results demonstrate a novel inhibitory role of Zn in adipocyte IL-6 production and suggest a potential role for Zn in the regulation of adipocyte-associated chronic inflammation.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Mice and primary adipocytes

All mice used were WT C57BL/6J, originally purchased from Jackson Laboratories, housed and maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in accordance with Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All studies were approved by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; protocol number 2023-0015). Free access to autoclaved chow diet (LabDiet #5010) and water was provided with weekly replacement.

Primary mouse adipocytes were generated by differentiating the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) isolated from inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) as previously described (12, 38, 39). iWAT was minced and digested with collagenase type IV (Gibco #17104019; 1 mg/mL) and dispase II (Roche #04942078001; 3 U/mL) in PBS with 10 mM CaCl2. The SVF containing preadipocytes was isolated and cultured until confluence in preadipocyte growth media (GM; 10% FBS, 100 U/mL Penicillin, 100 mg/L Streptomycin, 2 mM L-Gln in DMEM/F-12) with fresh media provided every two days. When confluence was reached at 5~6 days post-seeding, differentiation was induced by subjecting the cells to induction media (0.5 mM 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 1 μM dexamethasone, 1 μM rosiglitazone and 850 nM insulin in GM), followed by continuation media (rosiglitazone and insulin in GM), and differentiation media (insulin in GM), each for two days. At day 6 post-induction, maximal differentiation was confirmed under microscope prior to performing experiments.

2.2 Treatment of cells and cytokine quantification

Cells were exposed to zinc pyrithione (ZnPT; 2 μM unless otherwise indicated), zinc chloride (ZnCl2), zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), sodium pyrithione (NaPT; 4 μM), and/or N,N,N’,N’-tetrakis-(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine (TPEN; 5 μM) diluted into fresh GM at indicated concentrations for three hours. Cells were then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL), Pam2CSK4 (10 μg/mL), poly(I:C) (25 μg/mL), flagellin (1 μg/mL), PMA (50 ng/mL) + ionomycin (1 μg/mL), PHA (10 μg/mL), αCD3 (1 μg/mL), or recombinant mouse IL-6 (rIL-6; Life Technologies #14806162; 1 μL/mL) for four hours or for specified time after stimulation. Cells treated with zinc compounds and immune stimulants were paralleled by control groups that received mock treatment with vehicles. Time point of 0 min indicates sample collection before stimulation, whereas 0+ min indicates immediately after. For Stat3 inhibition experiments, cells were exposed to ZnPT or vehicle control (DMSO) for three hours, followed by Stat3 inhibitor C188-9 (Selleckchem #S8605; 20 μM) treatment together with LPS stimulation. Culture media was collected for quantification of IL-6 cytokine levels by ELISA as per manufacturer’s instruction (BD OptEIA).

2.3 Quantitative RT-PCR

Primary adipocytes, cultured as described above, were homogenized in TRIzol (Invitrogen) and RNA was extracted, followed by reverse transcription using Verso cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific). Quantitative real-time PCR was conducted using PerfeCTa qPCR SuperMix (VWR) on QuantStudio 7 (Applied Biosystems). All procedures followed the manufacturers’ instructions. Data was analyzed using ΔΔCt method, and the mRNA expression of indicated genes were quantitated using Actb as normalization control. The sequence of primer pairs used is listed in Supplementary Table 1.

2.4 RNA-seq analysis

Primary adipocytes isolated and differentiated above, and bone marrow-derived macrophages isolated from femur as previously described (4043), were stimulated with or without LPS (100 ng/mL) for four hours, and gene expression profile was determined as previously described (12). Briefly, RNA was extracted, quantified (Qubit RNA Assay Kit), and library was prepared (Illumina TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit), which was subjected to sequencing by 50 base pair single-end reads (~20 million reads per sample). Transcriptomic analysis was performed using AltAnalyze software (ver 2.1.4.3) (44). Reasonably expressed transcripts were subjected to differential expression analysis (unstimulated versus stimulated) through t-test with p-values adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) false discovery rate approach. p-value cutoff of 0.05 and fold change requirement of >1.5 were applied. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using ToppGene with KEGG pathways for mouse.

2.5 Protein analysis by Western blotting

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor (Roche cOmplete) and phosphatase inhibitor (Pierce) cocktails, and cell debris was removed after centrifugation. Total protein was quantified by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) to equalize protein concentration across treatment conditions. Samples were mixed with Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad) containing fresh β-mercaptoethanol (2.5% final), boiled for 5 mins, and loaded onto Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Gels (4-15%) at 10-20 μg/well, to be separated by SDS-PAGE in running buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS). Proteins were then transferred to 0.45 μm pore sized PVDF membrane in CAPS transfer buffer (10 mM CAPS, 10% ethanol, pH 11). Membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk/TBST (0.1% Tween 20) for 1 hour and incubated with respective primary antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by 2-hour incubation with secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG HRP, Cell Signaling Technology #7074; 1:5000 in 5% milk/TBST), all with gentle agitation. Primary antibodies used are Erk1/2 (137F5) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology #4695; 1:500 in 5% milk/TBST), phospho-Erk1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) (D13.14.4E) XP Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology #4370; 1:500 in 2.5% milk + 2.5% BSA/TBST), Stat3 (C-20) (Santa Cruz #sc-482; 1:1000 in 5% milk/TBST), p-Stat3 (Ser727)-R (Santa Cruz #sc-8001-R; 1:1000 in 5% milk/TBST), and α-Tubulin (11H10) Rabbit mAb #2125; 1:3000 in 5% milk/TBST). Protein signals were detected by chemiluminescence (Thermo Scientific #34580) following manufacturer’s instruction with Bio-Rad ChemiDOC Touch imaging system. Densitometry analysis was performed with ImageJ software.

2.6 Live cell imaging

For visualization of intracellular free Zn ion, primary adipocytes were incubated with 1 µM FluoZin-3 AM (Invitrogen) for 1 hour at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated in fresh, dye-free media for additional 30 min. Images were acquired 5 min post-treatment with 2 µM ZnPT using Keyence BZ-X810 microscope with FITC filter. For cell viability assessment, adipocytes were pre-treated with or without 2 µM ZnPT for 3 hours, followed by stimulation with LPS for additional 4 hours. Cells were stained with 0.4% Trypan Blue solution and brightfield images were captured. For all images, 100 µm scale bar was applied for reference on bottom right corner.

2.7 Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed with two or more independent biological repeats. Data are presented as means ± SEM, with individual data points included when applicable. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software. Statistical significance was tested by Student’s t-test (unpaired, non-parametric, two-tailed) for comparisons between two groups, or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis for comparisons between three or more groups (α=0.05). The level of significance is denoted using asterisks, with corresponding p-value thresholds indicated in figure legends.

3 Results

3.1 Adipocytes have immune cell-like properties

To begin to broadly characterize adipocyte inflammatory potential, we stimulated primary mouse adipocytes or bone marrow-derived macrophages with vehicle or LPS, and compared their gene expression profiles using bulk RNA-Seq analysis. Differentially expressed genes in LPS-stimulated adipocytes and macrophages, relative to unstimulated counterparts, were identified. Notably, LPS stimulation substantially altered gene expression in both adipocytes and macrophages (Figure 1A). Among 494 genes that were upregulated by LPS stimulation in adipocytes, 71 were also increased by LPS stimulation in macrophages (Figure 1B). This finding indicates a conserved LPS-induced transcriptomic responses between adipocytes and macrophages. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the 71 genes co-upregulated in LPS-stimulated adipocytes and macrophages are largely relevant to cellular inflammatory responses and cytokine production (Figure 1C). Further, LPS stimulation resulted in downregulation of a set of genes in adipocytes, although their conservation with genes downregulated in LPS-stimulated macrophages was highly limited (Supplementary Figure 1). These data confirm that adipocytes, akin to macrophages, have the capacity to sense inflammatory stimuli and respond by adjusting cellular processes via alterations in their transcriptional profile.

Figure 1
Panel A shows a bar graph comparing the number of differentially expressed genes in adipocytesand macrophages when stimulated with LPS, highlighting adipocytes’ capacity to sense and respond to inflammatorystimuli. Panel B is a Venn diagram showing overlap between upregulated genes in adipocytes and macrophages whenstimulated with LPS. Panel C presents a bar graph listing the pathways upregulated by adipocytes and macrophageswhen stimulated with LPS. Panel D contains bar graphs showing IL-6 levels produced by adipocytes, measured inpicograms per milliliter, upon various immunological stimuli, demonstrating significantly increased IL-6 production byadipocytes in response to stimulation.

Figure 1. TLR-driven induction of inflammatory signaling pathways in adipocytes. (A–C) Gene expression analysis performed using AltAnalyze (n=2 biological replicates per group). (A) Genes that have greater than 1.5-fold difference in expression between unstimulated and LPS-stimulated adipocytes or macrophages (red, upregulated; blue, downregulated) with p < 0.05 significance by unpaired t-test (multiple testing corrected via BH method). (B) Number of genes that are upregulated in either adipocytes, macrophages, or both. (C) ToppGene pathway enrichment analysis of the 71 co-upregulated genes in LPS-stimulated adipocytes and macrophages using KEGG pathways for mouse. From the 20 most significantly altered pathways, those related to inflammatory response and cytokine production are selectively displayed. Full list of differentially expressed genes is provided in Supplementary Datasheet 2. (D) IL-6 levels in the primary adipocyte culture media upon TLR-specific stimulation (left panel) or general immunological stimulation (right panel) measured by cytokine ELISA. ns, non-stimulated. Bars and error bars represent means ± SEM, circles represent independent repeats. Asterisk indicates statistical significance by Student’s t-test (***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001).

To examine whether adipocyte inflammatory capability is restricted to LPS, primary mouse adipocytes were stimulated with various immune activators and their ability to produce inflammatory cytokines was evaluated. Of note, as adipocytes are robust producers of IL-6 (16), we focused our attention on adipocytes’ ability to produce IL-6. Stimulation with various TLR-specific ligands (e.g., Pam2CSK4, poly(I:C), and flagellin) or common immune activators (e.g., phorbol myristate acetate [PMA]/ionomycin, phytohemagglutinin [PHA]), were all sufficient to induce IL-6 production in adipocytes (Figure 1D). Exposure to anti-CD3, a selective activator of T cell receptor signaling, did not elicit IL-6 production by adipocytes. Together, these results highlight wide-ranging immune cell-like properties of adipocyte inflammatory responses.

3.2 Zinc restricts TLR-driven IL-6 production of adipocytes

Given the ability of adipocytes to respond to TLR stimulation and the established role of Zn in immune regulation (27), we next examined whether Zn could impact adipocyte cytokine production. Primary mouse adipocytes were treated with Zn in the form of zinc pyrithione (ZnPT), and intracellular free Zn level was visualized using Zn-selective probe FluoZin-3 AM. FluoZin-3 AM loaded cells exhibited robust increase in fluorescent signals upon ZnPT exposure, confirming rapid elevation of intracellular zinc levels (Figure 2A). Adipocytes treated with ZnPT showed marked reduction in the level of IL-6 release upon LPS stimulation compared to controls (Figure 2B). This effect was specific to Zn, as treatment with sodium pyrithione (NaPT) did not modify LPS-driven IL-6 production in adipocytes. Addition of TPEN, a known Zn chelator, effectively reversed the suppressive effect of ZnPT on LPS-driven IL-6 production by adipocytes. Treatment with TPEN alone did not alter LPS-induced IL-6 production (data not shown). Further, ZnPT had a dose-dependent effect in suppressing the LPS-driven IL-6 production by adipocytes (Figure 2C). As pyrithione facilitates the direct movement of Zn into the cell cytosol circumventing the regulatory control of Zn flux by the Zn transporters, we next questioned whether Zn exposure, in the absence of an ionophore, would have a comparable effect. The administration of Zn in the form of zinc chloride (ZnCl2) or zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), failed to alter adipocytes’ ability to produce IL-6 in response to LPS stimulation (Figure 2D), implicating the importance of Zn cytosolic functions in regulating adipocyte IL-6 release.

Figure 2
Panel A shows two fluorescence microscopy images with FluoZin-3 AM staining: a control and onetreated with zinc pyrithione, with treated cells showing positive signal. Panels B to E present bar graphs measuring IL-6 levels in picograms per milliliter with different treatments to adipocytes. Panel B compares control, zinc pyrithione, sodium pyrithione, zinc pyrithione with TPEN, and sodium pyrithione with TPEN, highlighting significant reduction in IL-6 specifically in zinc pyrithione group. Panel C shows dose dependent reduction in IL-6 levels with increasing concentration of zinc pyrithione at 0, 1, and 2 micromolar. Panel D displays IL-6 levels unaffected with treatment of zinc chloride and zinc sulfate at 0, 1, and 100 micromolar. Panel E compares IL-6 levels under different TLR ligand stimulations: Pam2, Poly (I:C), LPS, and flagellin. In all groups, zinc pyrithione treated adipocytes produced less IL-6 than controls.

Figure 2. Zinc pyrithione restricts IL-6 production in adipocytes. (A) Increased intracellular Zn levels in zinc pyrithione (ZnPT)-treated primary adipocytes shown by Fluozin-3 AM staining. White scale bars indicate 100 µm. (B–E) IL-6 levels in the primary mouse adipocyte culture media measured by cytokine ELISA. (B) Reduction in IL-6 levels upon LPS stimulation when treated with ZnPT. The specificity of Zn effect was tested by evaluating the effects of sodium pyrithione (NaPT) and Zn chelator (TPEN) on IL-6 levels. (C) The effect of varying ZnPT concentrations on adipocyte IL-6 production upon LPS stimulation. (D) Effect of different levels of zinc chloride (left panel) and zinc sulfate (right panel) on adipocytes’ capacity to produce IL-6. (E) The effect of ZnPT treatment on adipocytes stimulated with different TLR ligands. ns, non-stimulated. Bars and error bars represent means ± SEM, circles represent independent repeats. Asterisk indicates statistical significance by Student’s t-test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).

Given the adipocytes’ ability to produce IL-6 in response to various TLR stimuli, we next investigated whether Zn similarly limits adipocyte IL-6 production in response to TLR stimulation beyond the LPS/TLR4 axis. Different TLR ligands were employed to stimulate the adipocytes treated with or without ZnPT. Adipocytes treated with ZnPT, followed by stimulation with Pam2, Poly(I:C), or flagellin produced significantly reduced amount of IL-6 (Figure 2E). Collectively, these data suggest that elevated intracellular level of bioavailable Zn in primary mouse adipocytes restricts cellular capacity to produce IL-6 following TLR stimulation.

We next examined the potential mechanisms underlying Zn suppressive effects on IL-6 production in adipocytes. Cytokine production is often regulated at the level of transcriptional regulation (45). Therefore, we first examined the impact of Zn treatment on IL-6 mRNA expression. Adipocytes treated with ZnPT prior to LPS stimulation showed significantly lower Il6 expression (Figure 3A). This was somewhat specific to IL-6, as genes of other inflammatory cytokines which are also strongly induced in adipocytes upon LPS stimulation (e.g., Tnf, Il1b) were not impacted by Zn treatment. We also asked if the mRNA levels of IL-6 receptor complex, IL-6R and gp130, were impacted by Zn treatment. The expression of Il6ra and Il6st, which encode IL-6R and gp130, respectively, were both reduced in LPS-stimulated adipocytes when treated with ZnPT (Figure 3B). These data suggest that Zn preferentially downregulates the mRNA transcription of IL-6, IL-6R, and gp130.

Figure 3
Graphs and images display the effects of zinc pyrithione with LPS stimulation on gene expressionsand cell death. Panel A shows reduced Il6 expression but not Tnf and Il1b expressions in zinc pyrithione treatedadipocytes. Panel B shows reduced Il6ra and Il6st expressions in zinc pyrithione treated adipocytes. Panel C showsmicroscopic images of Trypan blue staining of treatment groups, confirming no difference in cell death under treatmentconditions. Panel D shows elevated Dusp4 and 5 expressions and reduced Irak3 and Socs3 expressions in zincpyrithione treated adipocytes.

Figure 3. ZnPT alters the expression of genes involved in IL-6 production without inducing adipocyte cell death. mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines (A), IL-6 receptors (B), and suppressors of signaling pathways involved in IL-6 production (D) from primary mouse adipocytes treated with or without ZnPT, stimulated with LPS. Quantified by RT-qPCR, normalized to Actb. (C) Representative images of Trypan blue staining of cells after each treatment condition. White scale bars indicate 100 µm. ns, non-stimulated; ND, not detected. Bars and error bars represent means ± SEM, circles represent independent repeats. Asterisk indicates statistical significance by Student’s t-test (*p<0.05, ***p<0.001).

3.3 Zinc interferes with the activation of Erk1/2 and Stat3 signaling pathways

Although Zn is recognized for its various antioxidant roles (46), excess Zn can act as a prooxidant that promotes oxidative stress, leading to disruption of cell homeostasis (46). As ZnPT treatment may cause Zn overload we examined whether it impacts adipocyte survival. To rule out cytotoxicity of Zn overload as the cause of reduced IL-6 production, cell death was visually assessed with Trypan Blue viability staining and by the expression of genes important in cell death and survival. No visible difference in cell morphology nor in the number of dead cells was observed in adipocytes treated with ZnPT (Figure 3C). Further, genes indicative of apoptosis (Casp3, Casp9, and Bim) were not differentially expressed in LPS-stimulated adipocytes treated with or without ZnPT. In fact, ZnPT treatment of adipocytes resulted in elevated expression of anti-apoptotic gene (Bcl2) (Supplementary Figure 2). These data suggest that induction of cell death is an unlikely process associated with ZnPT-dependent restriction of LPS-driven IL-6 production in adipocytes.

We next investigated if ZnPT-dependent reduction of adipocyte IL-6 production is linked to transcriptional downregulation of TLRs, resulting in reduced stimulation signals in adipocytes. To determine if elevated intracellular Zn modulates TLR expression, the levels of Tlr mRNAs were compared between ZnPT-treated and untreated adipocytes. Surprisingly, adipocytes stimulated with LPS exhibited increased Tlr4 expression when exposed to ZnPT compared to untreated controls (Supplementary Figure 3). Tlr2, Tlr3, and Tlr5 expression levels were not significantly altered by ZnPT treatment in both non-stimulated and stimulated conditions with their corresponding ligands (Pam2, poly(I:C), and flagellin, respectively). These data suggest that differences in adipocyte Tlr expression is likely not the dominant process responsible for Zn-induced reduction in IL-6 secretion in adipocytes.

Extracellular signals received by TLRs are transduced within the cells through multiple signaling cascades, including the activation of NF-κB, MAPKs, and Jak/Stat pathways, which in turn induce the expression of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 (47). Various regulatory molecules impact the activation or suppression of these signaling pathways, resulting in differential expression of downstream genes. Thus, to examine which inflammatory signaling pathways may be influenced by ZnPT treatment leading to altered expression of IL-6 and its receptor genes, the expression of several regulators known to impact the inflammatory signaling pathways were quantified. Dual-specificity phosphatases (Dusps) are negative regulators of MAPK pathway through MAPK dephosphorylation, with Dusp5 specifically targeting Erk1/2 (48). IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 3 (Irak3) inhibits Myd88-mediated signaling (49), while suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (Socs3) is a member of Stat-induced Stat inhibitor family and serves as both a regulator and a target of Stat signaling pathways (50). Significant increases in Dusp4 and Dusp5 expression was observed in adipocytes exposed to ZnPT, whereas Irak3 and Socs3 expression was found to be decreased (Figure 3D). Dusp5 was robustly induced with ZnPT treatment (~5-fold increase on average) both in unstimulated and LPS-stimulated cells.

Given the elevated Dusp4/5 expression in adipocytes treated with ZnPT, we next examined if increased intracellular Zn levels suppress Erk1/2 activation by upregulating Dusp expression. Activation of Erk1/2 following LPS stimulation was assessed in adipocytes treated with or without ZnPT. Contrary to our anticipation, p-Erk1/2 to total Erk1/2 ratio was higher in adipocytes treated with ZnPT, revealing stronger Erk1/2 activation (Figure 4, upper panels). Instead, we found attenuated activation of Stat3, as indicated by lower p-Stat3/Stat3 ratio in ZnPT treated adipocytes (Figure 4, lower panels). Together, these results suggest that intracellular Zn availability differentially impacts inflammatory signaling pathways downstream of TLR4 in primary mouse adipocytes.

Figure 4
Western blot and line graphs depicting the effects of zinc pyrithione on ERK1/2 and Stat3phosphorylation over time with LPS treatment. Blots show bands for phosphorylated ERK1/2, total ERK1/2,alpha-Tubulin, phosphorylated Stat3, total Stat3, and alpha-Tubulin. Corresponding graphs show the phosphorylatedover total ratio changes over time in minutes, comparing control and zinc pyrithione conditions with significantdifferences marked.

Figure 4. ZnPT interferes with the activation of Erk1/2 and Stat3 signaling pathways. Proteins of intracellular signaling pathways quantified by Western blot analysis. Phosphorylation levels of Erk1/2 and Stat3 proteins were assessed. Primary mouse adipocytes were collected at indicated timepoints after LPS stimulation, in the presence or absence of ZnPT. Left panels, representative image of 3 biological repeats. α-Tubulin included as loading control. The positions of molecular size markers are shown on the left of each blot. Right panels, ratio of phospho-protein over total protein indicative of signaling activation, with values presented relative to Ctrl at 0 min timepoint. Circles and error bars represent means ± SEM. Asterisk indicates statistical significance (*p<0.05, **p<0.01) between Ctrl and ZnPT at each time point, determined by multiple unpaired t-tests with FDR of q < 0.05.

3.4 Zinc restricts IL-6-Stat3 positive feedback loop

Activation of Stat3 develops in response to a range of extracellular stimuli transmitted via TLRs, cytokine receptors, receptor tyrosine kinases, G protein-coupled receptors, and growth factor receptors (51). Regardless of ZnPT treatment, activation of Erk1/2 occurred within 3 minutes post-LPS stimulation, preceding Stat3 activation by approximately 2 hours (Figure 4). We queried if the delay in Stat3 activation occurred through the skewing of the positive feedback loop rather than by direct TLR-mediated route, in which IL-6 production drives the activation of IL-6 receptor-mediated pathway. To examine this, recombinant IL-6 (rIL-6) was used to confirm that Stat3 is activated in adipocytes in response to IL-6, and to define the timeframe of Stat3 activation following IL-6 exposure. Indeed, rIL-6 stimulation was sufficient to activate Stat3 at a much earlier point (10 min) compared to LPS stimulation (Figure 5A, Ctrl). Subsequently, we analyzed the contribution of Stat3 activation in adipocytes stimulated with LPS. Adipocytes were mock-treated or treated with Stat3 inhibitor (C188-9) and stimulated with LPS. Inhibition of Stat3 resulted in a significant, although not complete, reduction of LPS-driven IL-6 production by adipocytes (Figure 5B, white background). These data demonstrate that while primary mouse adipocytes with inhibited Stat3 can still produce IL-6, Stat3 activation is required to achieve maximal IL-6 production via a positive feedback loop in response to TLR stimulation.

Figure 5
Panel A shows a Western blot analysis of phosphorylated Stat3, Total Stat3, and alpha-Tubulin incontrol and zinc pyrithione-treated adipocytes over a time course with recombinant IL-6 stimulation. A line graph below illustrates the change of phosphorylated Stat3 over total Stat3 ratio over time, highlighting statistical significance at various time points. Panel B displays a bar graph of IL-6 levels in picograms per milliliter under different treatment conditions of adipocytes, showing significant differences with LPS, C188-9, and ZnPT treatments. Statistical significance is marked with asterisks for comparisons.

Figure 5. ZnPT restricts IL-6 induced activation of Stat3 signaling in adipocytes. (A) Protein levels of phospho-Stat3 and total Stat3 quantified by Western blot analysis. Primary mouse adipocytes were collected at indicated timepoints after treatment with recombinant IL-6, in the presence or absence of ZnPT. Upper panel, representative image of 3 biological repeats. α-Tubulin included as loading control. The positions of molecular size markers are shown on the left of each blot. Lower panel, ratio of phospho-Stat3 over total Stat3 indicative of signaling activation, with values presented relative to Ctrl at 0 min timepoint. Circles and error bars represent means ± SEM (*p<0.05, Ctrl vs ZnPT at each time point). (B) IL-6 levels in the culture media of primary adipocytes upon LPS stimulation when treated with Stat3 inhibitor (C188-9), in the presence or absence of ZnPT, measured by cytokine ELISA. Bars and error bars represent means ± SEM, circles represent independent repeats. Asterisk indicates statistical significance by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis (*p < 0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001).

We questioned how Zn may influence the TLR/Stat3/IL-6 signaling axis and the IL-6/Stat3 positive feedback loop. First, we examined the rIL-6-induced Stat3 activation in ZnPT-treated adipocytes. The level of IL-6 produced by ZnPT-treated cells was evaluated after LPS stimulation with or without the Stat3 inhibitor. Consistent with our previous observation, the Stat3 activation was markedly reduced in adipocytes exposed to ZnPT prior to rIL-6 stimulation (Figure 5A), implying a role for increased intracellular Zn in attenuating the Stat3-driven amplification of IL-6 production. Notably, adipocyte treatment with ZnPT and Stat3 inhibitor did not further reduce IL-6 production from ZnPT alone. These data suggest that ZnPT effects on LPS-driven IL-6 production are possibly mediated by suppression of Stat3 signaling (Figure 5B, grey background). Combined, these data demonstrate that adipocyte production of IL-6 is maximized by a Stat3-driven amplification loop, and that elevated intracellular Zn restricts IL-6 production by suppressing the IL-6/Stat3 positive feedback loop.

4 Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that the treatment of ZnPT to primary mouse adipocytes effectively suppresses their IL-6 production. Specifically, we confirmed that adipocytes, like immune cells, respond to various immunological stimuli through activation of TLR signaling and produce IL-6. We showed that IL-6 production by adipocytes is maximized via a Stat3-mediated positive feedback loop. The initially released IL-6 acts in an autocrine manner to activate IL-6 receptors, which subsequently triggers Stat3 activation further enhancing IL-6 release. Increased cellular influx of Zn, mediated by pyrithione, suppressed IL-6-induced Stat3 activation as well as the delayed Stat3 activation following LPS stimulation. These data suggest that increased Zn influx into adipocytes dampens the amplification loop thereby reducing total IL-6 production. A schematic diagram illustrating the proposed mechanism of IL-6 production in adipocytes, and the suppressive role of Zn in this setting, is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Diagram illustrating proposed mechanism. Panel A shows under regular zinc conditions: TLRsignaling lead to MAPK, NF-kB, and STAT3 activation and result in IL-6 production, which acts in an autocrine mannerto activate IL-6 receptors to further enhance IL-6 release. Panel B illustrates the impact of increased zinc presence:TLR signaling similarly leads to IL-6 production, but zinc suppresses Stat3 activation thereby reducing IL-6 output.

Figure 6. Schematic diagram illustrating the proposed mechanism of adipocyte IL-6 production (A) and its suppression by the presence of high zinc (B).

The initial rise in IL-6 levels is necessary to activate Stat3, which likely occurs through TLR-activated signaling pathways independent of Stat3. For example, early activation of Erk1/2 was observed following LPS stimulation. Adipocytes were still able to produce substantial amounts of IL-6 even when Stat3 activation was inhibited, implying that alternative inflammatory pathways, such as the MAPK pathway, drive the initial IL-6 production. In fact, we observed immediate activation of Erk1/2 upon LPS stimulation, both in the presence and absence of ZnPT, supporting this notion. Alternatively, it is possible that a molecule other than IL-6 serves as the inducer of Stat3 signaling. Stat3 can be activated by numerous factors, including cytokines from the common gamma chain, gp130, and IL-10 receptor families, as well as type I and II interferons and various growth factors (51, 52). Adipocytes are known to secrete more than 50 cytokines and adipokines, some of which (e.g. IL-6, TNFα, IL-1β) could be released upon LPS stimulation and potentially trigger Stat3 signaling (53). Our data show that LPS induces the expression of Tnf and Il1b in adipocytes, although the corresponding protein levels in media were not measured. While we verified Stat3 activation in response to IL-6, we did not rule out the possibility of activation by other adipocyte-derived factors, such as TNFα and IL-1β.

The observed increase in Tlr4 expression in ZnPT-treated adipocytes, despite suppressed IL-6 release, may be attributed to multiple factors. One possibility is the elevated Erk signaling in Zn-loaded adipocytes. Erk is a known inducer of the c-Fos/c-Jun pathway, and as the Tlr4 promoter contains a functional AP-1 binding site (54), this signaling axis could directly enhance Tlr4 transcription. However, further validation of this mechanism was not performed, nor was it verified whether this mRNA increase translated to higher protein levels, warranting future investigations on this topic.

Zn is an important regulator of cellular signaling (25), and its effects on the modulation of protein kinases have been explored across various cell types. Evidence suggests that Zn influences MAPK signaling, with an increase in Erk1/2 phosphorylation reported in fibroblasts (55) and neurons (56, 57) treated with Zn. Activation of Erk and Akt pathways by elevated intracellular Zn has also been reported in in HeLa, MCF10A, and HT-22 cells (58). Our data further demonstrate that zinc treatment enhances Erk signaling in adipocytes as well. However, the specific protein(s) affected by Zn and the exact mechanism of action remain unknown. It is proposed that Zn targets signaling upstream of Ras, thereby impacting Erk (58), and may modulate phosphatases that regulate the kinase cascade (59, 60). While Zn treatment increased Erk1/2 phosphorylation, it suppressed Stat3 phosphorylation and consequently attenuated the Stat3/IL-6 amplification loop in adipocytes. Published data suggests differential effects of Zn on Stat signaling pathway. Specifically, in rats with maternal Zn deficiency, Stat1 and Stat3 signaling were impaired in the fetal brain (61). The mammary epithelial cells of ZnT2-/- mice were found to accumulate cytosolic Zn as a consequence of impaired Zn efflux, which resulted in diminished Stat5 phosphorylation in these cells (62). Mechanistically, Zn activated SHP1, a protein tyrosine phosphatase that acts as a negative regulator of Stat3 pathway, to inhibit Stat3 activation in hepatocytes (63). Although this mechanism has not been tested in adipocytes, it is conceivable that Zn-driven suppression of Stat3 signaling in adipocytes may involve a similar pathway.

Zn homeostasis is crucial for maintaining cellular health and metabolic function. While Zn is essential, excessive levels of Zn can lead to toxicity (46, 64). Therefore, the cellular flux of Zn is tightly regulated by the expression of multiple Zn transporters of ZnT and ZIP families distributed across different cellular compartments (65). Additionally, cells express metallothioneins that bind free Zn, minimizing the level of reactive Zn and releasing it as needed to mitigate the toxicity (66). Zn availability is sensed by the cells through the metal regulatory transcription factor (MTF-1) (67). MTF-1 has a DNA-binding domain with six Zn fingers, two of which have low affinity to Zn, allowing it to respond effectively to fluctuating Zn levels. Under conditions of high Zn, active MTF-1 interacts with metal-responsive elements (MREs) located in the promoters of target genes, orchestrating their expression to maintain homeostasis. For example, the expression of ZnT1 Zn efflux transporter is induced to facilitate the removal of excess intracellular Zn. It is important to note that only a limited number of genes are direct targets of MTF-1 (67); many genes that respond to Zn levels are regulated indirectly or through mechanisms that remain to be elucidated. In our study, when Zn was introduced in the form of ZnCl2 or ZnSO4, no significant changes in IL-6 levels produced by LPS-stimulated adipocytes were observed. We speculate that such outcomes reflect the above-described cells’ ability to regulate Zn flux. As a charged transition metal ion, Zn cannot pass through biological membranes freely, and instead cells rely on membrane Zn transporters for its import and export. Upon exposure to high Zn levels, rapid internalization and degradation of ZIP transporters is triggered which effectively blocks Zn influx, while increased expression of ZnT1 promotes Zn efflux. Together these processes work in unison to minimize the impact of sudden changes in Zn levels (65).

Pyrithione is a membrane permeable ionophore that, when combined with Zn to form Zn pyrithione, allows movement of Zn across biological membranes. This mechanism circumvents the cells’ regulation and can directly promote greater influx of Zn, potentially elevating intracellular Zn concentrations. In our study, we utilized ZnPT at a concentration of 2 µM. Considering that total cellular Zn concentrations are estimated to be in the tens to hundreds micromolar range (65), it may not seem high. However, since cells actively strive to maintain labile Zn low [estimated in picomolar to nanomolar range (68, 69)], the concentration of ZnPT used could be substantial. Intracellular Zn overload can induce cell death by activating Bim, which triggers Caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in cultured neurons (70). Therefore, we postulated that the Zn concentration might be too high, potentially disrupting Zn homeostasis and leading to cell death and the inability to produce cytokines. To evaluate this, we measured the expression of apoptosis-related genes including Bim and Casp3. Our data found no notable differences between LPS-stimulated cells with and without ZnPT exposure. Given the reported nearly 3-fold increase in Bim mRNA expression during Zn-induced apoptosis (70), it is unlikely that ZnPT treatment in our experiments was sufficient to trigger apoptosis. Alternatively, oxidative stress induced by excess Zn can also drive necroptosis or activate mitochondrial and lysosomal autophagy pathways, leading to different forms of cell death (64). However, our analysis of cell viability using Trypan blue staining found no visible differences between untreated and ZnPT treated adipocytes, confirming that the observed decrease in cytokine production was likely not attributable to zinc toxicity.

In our experiments, ZnPT treatment led to an increase in Dusp5 expression in adipocytes, which encodes a known negative regulator of the Erk signaling pathway. Consequently, we initially anticipated a reduction in Erk activation in the ZnPT-treated cells. Contrary to our expectations, however, LPS stimulation led to higher Erk1/2 phosphorylation in ZnPT-treated adipocytes than in untreated counterparts. We speculate that this observation may be attributable to the negative feedback mechanism within the Erk signaling pathway. While Dusp5 serves as a regulator of Erk signaling, it is also a target and a substrate of Erk. Specifically, Erk activation induces Dusp5 mRNA expression, and Erk-induced Dusp5 phosphorylation stabilizes the protein and increases its half-life (71). These processes together enhance the regulatory effects of Dusp5, leading to the resolution of Erk activation. Since the mRNA levels were measured in cells collected 4 hours after LPS stimulation, the elevated Dusp5 expression may be a result of prior Erk activation that occurred earlier in the timeline. In line with this, we also observed a reduction in LPS-induced Socs3 expression in ZnPT-treated adipocytes. As with Dusp5 and Erk signaling, Socs3 is a suppressor of Stat signaling pathway whose expression is induced by active Stat3, forming a negative feedback loop that controls cytokine production (50). The reduced Socs3 expression is therefore presumed to result from Stat3 downregulation, rather than an indication of increased (i.e. less suppressed) Stat3 activity.

Indeed, persistently high levels of Dusp4 and Dusp5 expression has been recognized as adverse indicators in obesity and insulin resistance, as they are linked to increased inflammation (72). In this study, although ZnPT treatment led to increased Dusp5 expression and enhanced LPS-induced Erk activation, adipocyte IL-6 release was significantly reduced along with diminished activation of Stat3. These findings suggest that increase in intracellular Zn can suppress IL-6 production by modulating Stat3 pathway, apart from elevated Erk signaling. Further, our data suggest that intracellular Zn availability could be a key factor in determining the inflammatory impact of adipocytes in obesity. One of the effects of IL-6 is to restrict Zn availability by inducing the expression of metallothionein (73), which binds and sequesters labile Zn. This is advantageous during an acute immune response, as it deprives the pathogens of the essential trace metal thereby limiting their proliferation (74). In a chronic inflammatory state (e.g., obesity) with consistently high IL-6 levels, however, such effects of IL-6 may feed into the sustained and unresolved IL-6 production by adipocytes. Our findings suggest that replenishing Zn in adipocytes suppresses IL-6 release, which can potentially facilitate the restoration of cellular Zn homeostasis and normalizing the amplified IL-6 production.

The identification of Zn as a negative regulator of adipocyte IL-6 production offers a mechanistic rationale for the clinical benefits observed in Zn supplementation trials. As noted, adipocyte-derived IL-6 promotes ATM accumulation and adipose tissue inflammation (17). This is particularly critical in obesity setting, given that adipose tissue inflammation is a known driver of metabolic complications, and that IL-6 specifically has been implicated in hepatocyte insulin resistance (6), atherosclerotic plaque growth (7), and the differentiation (8) and sustenance (9) of the pathogenic Th17 cells, the primary culprits in MASH development (10). While clinical studies have demonstrated that replenishing Zn can lower serum IL-6 and improve outcomes in metabolic syndrome (3133) and MASH (36), the precise molecular mechanisms of this intervention have remained elusive. Our findings suggest that these systemic benefits may stem, in part, from the ability of zinc to disrupt the Stat3-mediated positive feedback loop, thereby limiting adipocyte IL-6 production.

It is important to note that different adipose tissue depots exhibit distinct physiological profiles (75). While this study utilized iWAT-derived adipocytes to ensure experimental consistency, future studies utilizing alternative ex vivo models to explore depot-specific differences in Zn sensitivity would be valuable. Additionally, while this study centered on the signaling pathways governing primary mouse adipocyte IL-6 production, expanding the analysis to determine the impact of Zn on the broader adipokine profile including anti-inflammatory cytokines and to reproduce these findings in primary human adipocytes are warranted. Furthermore, in vivo studies are required to determine whether intracellular Zn levels are intrinsically altered within obese adipocytes, and if dietary Zn regimens can achieve the intracellular thresholds required to interrupt the Stat3-mediated amplification loop in lean and obese states.

In summary, we investigated the impact of Zn on adipocyte inflammatory vigor. We show that ZnPT treatment restricts TLR signaling-driven IL-6 production in primary mouse adipocytes, via suppressing Stat3 signaling activation and thereby constraining the positive feedback loop of amplifying IL-6 production. Our findings demonstrate a novel inhibitory role of Zn in the IL-6 production of non-immune cells known to contribute to disease pathogenesis. Specifically, our findings suggest a potential role of Zn in the regulation of adipocyte-associated chronic inflammation (76). Thus, adipocyte dysfunction driven by Zn imbalance may be an unexplored yet critical factor in chronic inflammation.

Data availability statement

The RNA-seq dataset used in this study has been deposited in GEO database and can be accessed at GSE110236 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?].

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

HC: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Visualization, Investigation. JE: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. MD: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. TS: Investigation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. KS: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation. PA: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. CU: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. JW: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. GD: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization, Formal analysis. SD: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Resources, Formal analysis.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported in part by Department of Defense W81XWH2010392 (to SD); PHS Grant P30DK078392 Pathology of the Digestive Disease Research Core Center at CCHMC (associated with SD); CCHMC Academic and Research Committee award (to SD); and CCHMC Albert B. Sabin Fellowship (to KS); and NIH R01AI178010 (to GD).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jasmin Preston for technical assistance provided as part of the SURF program, all members of Maria Fields lab and Ty Troutman lab for their critical inputs, and the members of Ian Lewkowich lab for technical support. The authors also would like to acknowledge UC and CCHMC Single Cell Genomics Core for RNA-Seq analysis. Images were generated with BioRender.com.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1714168/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Furman D, Campisi J, Verdin E, Carrera-Bastos P, Targ S, Franceschi C, et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat Med. (2019) 25:1822–32. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0675-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gabay C. Interleukin-6 and chronic inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther. (2006) 8 Suppl 2:S3. doi: 10.1186/ar1917

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hirano T. IL-6 in inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer. Int Immunol. (2021) 33:127–48. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxaa078

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Giraldez MD, Carneros D, Garbers C, Rose-John S, and Bustos M. New insights into IL-6 family cytokines in metabolism, hepatology and gastroenterology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) 18:787–803. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00473-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kaur S, Bansal Y, Kumar R, and Bansal G. A panoramic review of IL-6: Structure, pathophysiological roles and inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. (2020) 28:115327. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115327

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Senn JJ, Klover PJ, Nowak IA, and Mooney RA. Interleukin-6 induces cellular insulin resistance in hepatocytes. Diabetes. (2002) 51:3391–9. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3391

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Schuett H, Oestreich R, Waetzig GH, Annema W, Luchtefeld M, Hillmer A, et al. Transsignaling of interleukin-6 crucially contributes to atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2012) 32:281–90. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.229435

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jones GW, McLoughlin RM, Hammond VJ, Parker CR, Williams JD, Malhotra R, et al. Loss of CD4+ T cell IL-6R expression during inflammation underlines a role for IL-6 trans signaling in the local maintenance of Th17 cells. J Immunol. (2010) 184:2130–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901528

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Harbour SN, DiToro DF, Witte SJ, Zindl CL, Gao M, Schoeb TR, et al. T(H)17 cells require ongoing classic IL-6 receptor signaling to retain transcriptional and functional identity. Sci Immunol. (2020) 5:eaaw2262. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw2262

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Moreno-Fernandez ME, Giles DA, Oates JR, Chan CC, Damen M, Doll JR, et al. PKM2-dependent metabolic skewing of hepatic Th17 cells regulates pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. (2021) 33:1187–204.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.04.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sawada K, Chung H, Softic S, Moreno-Fernandez ME, and Divanovic S. The bidirectional immune crosstalk in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Cell Metab. (2023) 35:1852–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.10.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chan CC, Damen M, Moreno-Fernandez ME, Stankiewicz TE, Cappelletti M, Alarcon PC, et al. Type I interferon sensing unlocks dormant adipocyte inflammatory potential. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:2745. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16571-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Maurizi G, Della Guardia L, Maurizi A, and Poloni A. Adipocytes properties and crosstalk with immune system in obesity-related inflammation. J Cell Physiol. (2018) 233:88–97. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25855

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Alarcon PC, Damen M, Madan R, Deepe GS Jr., Spearman P, Way SS, et al. Adipocyte inflammation and pathogenesis of viral pneumonias: an overlooked contribution. Mucosal Immunol. (2021) 14:1224–34. doi: 10.1038/s41385-021-00404-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Tilg H and Moschen AR. Adipocytokines: mediators linking adipose tissue, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2006) 6:772–83. doi: 10.1038/nri1937

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mohamed-Ali V, Goodrick S, Rawesh A, Katz DR, Miles JM, Yudkin JS, et al. Subcutaneous adipose tissue releases interleukin-6, but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (1997) 82:4196–200. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.12.4450

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Han MS, White A, Perry RJ, Camporez JP, Hidalgo J, Shulman GI, et al. Regulation of adipose tissue inflammation by interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2020) 117:2751–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920004117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lehrskov LL and Christensen RH. The role of interleukin-6 in glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Semin Immunopathol. (2019) 41:491–9. doi: 10.1007/s00281-019-00747-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Matthews VB, Allen TL, Risis S, Chan MH, Henstridge DC, Watson N, et al. Interleukin-6-deficient mice develop hepatic inflammation and systemic insulin resistance. Diabetologia. (2010) 53:2431–41. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1865-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Carey AL, Steinberg GR, Macaulay SL, Thomas WG, Holmes AG, Ramm G, et al. Interleukin-6 increases insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in humans and glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation in vitro via AMP-activated protein kinase. Diabetes. (2006) 55:2688–97. doi: 10.2337/db05-1404

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Knudsen JG, Murholm M, Carey AL, Biensø RS, Basse AL, Allen TL, et al. Role of IL-6 in exercise training- and cold-induced UCP1 expression in subcutaneous white adipose tissue. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e84910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084910

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Braune J, Weyer U, Hobusch C, Mauer J, Brüning JC, Bechmann I, et al. IL-6 regulates M2 polarization and local proliferation of adipose tissue macrophages in obesity. J Immunol. (2017) 198:2927–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600476

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Maret W. Zinc and the zinc proteome. Met Ions Life Sci. (2013) 12:479–501. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5561-1_14

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kiouri DP, Tsoupra E, Peana M, Perlepes SP, Stefanidou ME, and Chasapis CT. Multifunctional role of zinc in human health: an update. Excli J. (2023) 22:809–27. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6335

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Chung H and Bird AJ. Zinc signals in biology. Zinc Signaling. (2019), 389–410. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0557-7_19

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Maywald M, Wessels I, and Rink L. Zinc signals and immunity. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:2222. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102222

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bonaventura P, Benedetti G, Albarède F, and Miossec P. Zinc and its role in immunity and inflammation. Autoimmun Rev. (2015) 14:277–85. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.11.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gu K, Xiang W, Zhang Y, Sun K, and Jiang X. The association between serum zinc level and overweight/obesity: a meta-analysis. Eur J Nutr. (2019) 58:2971–82. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1876-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Costarelli L, Muti E, Malavolta M, Cipriano C, Giacconi R, Tesei S, et al. Distinctive modulation of inflammatory and metabolic parameters in relation to zinc nutritional status in adult overweight/obese subjects. J Nutr Biochem. (2010) 21:432–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.02.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Feitosa MC, Lima VB, Moita Neto JM, and Marreiro Ddo N. Plasma concentration of IL-6 and TNF-α and its relationship with zincemia in obese women. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). (2013) 59:429–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ramb.2013.03.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Payahoo L, Ostadrahimi A, Mobasseri M, Khaje Bishak Y, Farrin N, Asghari Jafarabadi M, et al. Effects of zinc supplementation on the anthropometric measurements, lipid profiles and fasting blood glucose in the healthy obese adults. Adv Pharm Bull. (2013) 3:161–5. doi: 10.5681/apb.2013.027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Marreiro DN, Geloneze B, Tambascia MA, Lerário AC, Halpern A, and Cozzolino SM. Effect of zinc supplementation on serum leptin levels and insulin resistance of obese women. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2006) 112:109–18. doi: 10.1385/BTER:112:2:109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Cruz KJ, Morais JB, de Oliveira AR, Severo JS, and Marreiro DD. The effect of zinc supplementation on insulin resistance in obese subjects: a systematic review. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2017) 176:239–43. doi: 10.1007/s12011-016-0835-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Khorsandi H, Nikpayam O, Yousefi R, Parandoosh M, Hosseinzadeh N, Saidpour A, et al. Zinc supplementation improves body weight management, inflammatory biomarkers and insulin resistance in individuals with obesity: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Diabetol Metab Syndr. (2019) 11:101. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0497-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kim J and Ahn J. Effect of zinc supplementation on inflammatory markers and adipokines in young obese women. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2014) 157:101–6. doi: 10.1007/s12011-013-9885-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ostadmohammadi V, Namazi MJ, Rezasoltani M, Kheirkhah D, Rajabi M, Sharif A, et al. Effects of zinc supplementation on inflammatory status and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in overweight or obese children: a randomized clinical trial. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2024) 202:3496–503. doi: 10.1007/s12011-023-03954-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Hosseini R, Ferns GA, Sahebkar A, Mirshekar MA, and Jalali M. Zinc supplementation is associated with a reduction in serum markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cytokine. (2021) 138:155396. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155396

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Chan CC, Harley ITW, Pfluger PT, Trompette A, Stankiewicz TE, Allen JL, et al. A BAFF/APRIL axis regulates obesogenic diet-driven weight gain. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:2911. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23084-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Damen MS, Alarcon PC, Chan CC, Stankiewicz TE, Chung H, Sawada K, et al. A shift in PKM2 oligomeric state instructs adipocyte inflammatory potential. JCI Insight. (2025) 10:e185914. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.185914

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lykens JE, Terrell CE, Zoller EE, Divanovic S, Trompette A, Karp CL, et al. Mice with a selective impairment of IFN-gamma signaling in macrophage lineage cells demonstrate the critical role of IFN-gamma-activated macrophages for the control of protozoan parasitic infections in vivo. J Immunol. (2010) 184:877–85. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902346

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Chowdhury D, Alrefai H, Landero Figueroa JA, Candor K, Porollo A, Fecher R, et al. Metallothionein 3 controls the phenotype and metabolic programming of alternatively activated macrophages. Cell Rep. (2019) 27:3873–86.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.093

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Mukherjee R, Moreno-Fernandez ME, Giles DA, Cappelletti M, Stankiewicz TE, Chan CC, et al. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced) oxidase 2 modulates inflammatory vigor during nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression in mice. Hepatol Commun. (2018) 2:546–60. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1162

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Subramanian Vignesh K, Landero Figueroa JA, Porollo A, Divanovic S, Caruso JA, and Deepe GS Jr. IL-4 induces metallothionein 3- and SLC30A4-dependent increase in intracellular Zn(2+) that promotes pathogen persistence in macrophages. Cell Rep. (2016) 16:3232–46. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Olsson A, Venkatasubramanian M, Chaudhri VK, Aronow BJ, Salomonis N, Singh H, et al. Single-cell analysis of mixed-lineage states leading to a binary cell fate choice. Nature. (2016) 537:698–702. doi: 10.1038/nature19348

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Holloway AF, Rao S, and Shannon MF. Regulation of cytokine gene transcription in the immune system. Mol Immunol. (2002) 38:567–80. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(01)00094-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Lee SR. Critical role of zinc as either an antioxidant or a prooxidant in cellular systems. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2018) 2018:9156285. doi: 10.1155/2018/9156285

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kawasaki T and Kawai T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol. (2014) 5:461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Lang R and Raffi FAM. Dual-specificity phosphatases in immunity and infection: an update. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:2710. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112710

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Pereira M and Gazzinelli RT. Regulation of innate immune signaling by IRAK proteins. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1133354. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1133354

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Carow B and Rottenberg ME. SOCS3, a major regulator of infection and inflammation. Front Immunol. (2014) 5:58. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00058

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Stepkowski SM, Chen W, Ross JA, Nagy ZS, and Kirken RA. STAT3: an important regulator of multiple cytokine functions. Transplantation. (2008) 85:1372–7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181739d25

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Tolomeo M and Cascio A. The multifaced role of STAT3 in cancer and its implication for anticancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:603. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020603

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Johnston EK and Abbott RD. Adipose tissue paracrine-, autocrine-, and matrix-dependent signaling during the development and progression of obesity. Cells. (2023) 12:407. doi: 10.3390/cells12030407

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Roger T, Miconnet I, Schiesser AL, Kai H, Miyake K, and Calandra T. Critical role for Ets, AP-1 and GATA-like transcription factors in regulating mouse Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4) gene expression. Biochem J. (2005) 387:355–65. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041243

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Hansson A. Extracellular zinc ions induces mitogen-activated protein kinase activity and protein tyrosine phosphorylation in bombesin-sensitive Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. Arch Biochem Biophys. (1996) 328:233–8. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0168

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. He K and Aizenman E. ERK signaling leads to mitochondrial dysfunction in extracellular zinc-induced neurotoxicity. J Neurochem. (2010) 114:452–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06762.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Ho Y, Samarasinghe R, Knoch ME, Lewis M, Aizenman E, and DeFranco DB. Selective inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatases by zinc accounts for extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2-dependent oxidative neuronal cell death. Mol Pharmacol. (2008) 74:1141–51. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.049064

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Anson KJ, Corbet GA, and Palmer AE. Zn(2+) influx activates ERK and Akt signaling pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2021) 118:e2015786118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015786118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Yamasaki S, Sakata-Sogawa K, Hasegawa A, Suzuki T, Kabu K, Sato E, et al. Zinc is a novel intracellular second messenger. J Cell Biol. (2007) 177:637–45. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200702081

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Bafaro E, Liu Y, Xu Y, and Dempski RE. The emerging role of zinc transporters in cellular homeostasis and cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2017) 2:17029–. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.29

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Supasai S, Aimo L, Adamo AM, Mackenzie GG, and Oteiza PI. Zinc deficiency affects the STAT1/3 signaling pathways in part through redox-mediated mechanisms. Redox Biol. (2017) 11:469–81. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Lee S, Hennigar SR, Alam S, Nishida K, and Kelleher SL. Essential role for zinc transporter 2 (ZnT2)-mediated zinc transport in mammary gland development and function during lactation. J Biol Chem. (2015) 290:13064–78. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.637439

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Liu MJ, Bao S, Napolitano JR, Burris DL, Yu L, Tridandapani S, et al. Zinc regulates the acute phase response and serum amyloid A production in response to sepsis through JAK-STAT3 signaling. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e94934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094934

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Lai Y, Gao FF, Ge RT, Liu R, Ma S, and Liu X. Metal ions overloading and cell death. Cell Biol Toxicol. (2024) 40:72. doi: 10.1007/s10565-024-09910-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Kambe T, Tsuji T, Hashimoto A, and Itsumura N. The physiological, biochemical, and molecular roles of zinc transporters in zinc homeostasis and metabolism. Physiol Rev. (2015) 95:749–84. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00035.2014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Baltaci AK, Yuce K, and Mogulkoc R. Zinc metabolism and metallothioneins. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2018) 183:22–31. doi: 10.1007/s12011-017-1119-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Hardyman JE, Tyson J, Jackson KA, Aldridge C, Cockell SJ, Wakeling LA, et al. Zinc sensing by metal-responsive transcription factor 1 (MTF1) controls metallothionein and ZnT1 expression to buffer the sensitivity of the transcriptome response to zinc. Metallomics. (2016) 8:337–43. doi: 10.1039/C5MT00305A

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Krezel A and Maret W. Zinc-buffering capacity of a eukaryotic cell at physiological pZn. J Biol Inorg Chem. (2006) 11:1049–62. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0150-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Vinkenborg JL, Nicolson TJ, Bellomo EA, Koay MS, Rutter GA, and Merkx M. Genetically encoded FRET sensors to monitor intracellular Zn2+ homeostasis. Nat Methods. (2009) 6:737–40. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1368

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Eom JW, Lee JM, Koh JY, and Kim YH. AMP-activated protein kinase contributes to zinc-induced neuronal death via activation by LKB1 and induction of Bim in mouse cortical cultures. Mol Brain. (2016) 9:14. doi: 10.1186/s13041-016-0194-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Kucharska A, Rushworth LK, Staples C, Morrice NA, and Keyse SM. Regulation of the inducible nuclear dual-specificity phosphatase DUSP5 by ERK MAPK. Cell Signal. (2009) 21:1794–805. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.07.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Fernando S, Sellers J, Smith S, Bhogoju S, Junkins S, Welch M, et al. Metabolic impact of MKP-2 upregulation in obesity promotes insulin resistance and fatty liver disease. Nutrients. (2022) 14:2475. doi: 10.3390/nu14122475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Sato M, Sasaki M, and Hojo H. Differential induction of metallothionein synthesis by interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in rat tissues. Int J Immunopharmacol. (1994) 16:187–95. doi: 10.1016/0192-0561(94)90075-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Rahman MT and Karim MM. Metallothionein: a potential link in the regulation of zinc in nutritional immunity. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2018) 182:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s12011-017-1061-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Frank AP, de Souza Santos R, Palmer BF, and Clegg DJ. Determinants of body fat distribution in humans may provide insight about obesity-related health risks. J Lipid Res. (2019) 60:1710–9. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R086975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Damen M, Alarcon PC, Shah AS, and Divanovic S. Greasing the inflammatory pathogenesis of viral pneumonias in diabetes. Obes Rev. (2022) 23:e13415. doi: 10.1111/obr.13415

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: adipose tissue, cytokines, immunity, metals, obesity, pyrithione

Citation: Chung H, Eom J, Damen MS, Stankiewicz TE, Sawada K, Alarcon PC, Ulanowicz CJ, Wayland JL, Deepe Jr. GS and Divanovic S (2026) Zinc suppresses Stat3-driven IL-6 production in primary mouse adipocytes. Front. Immunol. 17:1714168. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1714168

Received: 27 September 2025; Accepted: 20 January 2026; Revised: 09 January 2026;
Published: 09 February 2026.

Edited by:

Ruiting Li, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Endre Károly Kristóf, University of Debrecen, Hungary
Stefano Quarta, National Research Council (CNR), Italy
Myoungsook Han, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, United States

Copyright © 2026 Chung, Eom, Damen, Stankiewicz, Sawada, Alarcon, Ulanowicz, Wayland, Deepe and Divanovic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Senad Divanovic, c2VuYWQuZGl2YW5vdmljQGNjaG1jLm9yZw==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.