Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing biomarker discovery through multi-scale and multi-omics integration in immune disordersView all 6 articles

Cross-Tissue Integrative Transcriptomic and Multimodal Analysis Suggests Shared Immune Signatures Linking Lupus Nephritis and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Scientific Research Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China
  • 2The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
  • 3First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
  • 4Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) are major organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), imposing significant health and economic burdens due to their chronic course. This study aims to explore putative shared molecular signatures and hypothesis-generating therapeutic targets by examining the expression profiles of genes associated with LN and CLE. Methods: We analyzed gene expression profiles from LN and CLE using bulk transcriptome analysis, single-cell RNA sequencing, and machine learning approaches. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was employed to reveal gene modules associated with clinical traits. Functional enrichment analyses were performed to characterize implicated pathways. Machine learning algorithms, including LASSO, SVM-RFE, and random forest, were applied to screen for putative biomarkers. Single-cell datasets were used to determine the cellular distribution of candidate genes, and validation was conducted in the lupus mouse model C57BL/6-FasLpr. Results: A total of 361 DEGs in LN and 711 DEGs in CLE were identified, with 99 overlapping genes. We combined overlapping genes from WGCNA and DEGs to conducted enrichment analysis, highlighted disease-associated mechanism enriched in immune-related pathways, particularly type I interferon signaling. Machine learning analysis identified six hub genes, PDE4B, ISG20, IFI27, PARP12, IFI44 and GATA3, most of which demonstrated diagnostic value with AUC values >0.7. Single-cell RNA sequencing confirmed their expression in T cells, B cells, and NK cells, implicating them in immune dysregulation. In vivo validation in Lpr mice revealed elevated serum IFN-β levels and decreased ratio of CD4/CD8, consistent with human transcriptomic findings. Conclusion: This integrative analysis establishes a shared molecular signature between LN and CLE. The identified hub genes represent promising hypothesis-generating molecular signatures and hypothesis-generating therapeutic targets, with potential to improve risk stratification, guide early intervention, and support precision medicine approaches for lupus comorbidities.

Keywords: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus, Lupus Nephritis, machine learning, shared immunopathological mechanisms, single-cell RNA sequencing, systemic lupus erythematosus, weighted gene co-expression network analysis

Received: 30 Sep 2025; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Li, Song, Wang, Yuan, Zhang, Sun, Zhang, Wang, Sun, Zhao, Zhu, Wang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Meilu Li

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.