REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 11 February 2026

Sec. Autoimmune Disorders

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1728403

Restoring B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity: a rational strategy for lupus treatment

  • 1. State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, The School of Graduate Studies, Brooklyn, NY, United States

  • 2. Department of Cell Biology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, United States

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE or lupus) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized and driven by anti-nuclear antibodies, most prominently anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA IgGs. Lupus remains a serious clinical challenge largely because available medications lack specificity to lupus autoimmunity, unavoidably impairing normal immune responses and often harming other important body functions. Reinforcement of immune tolerance has a great potential for selective suppression of lupus autoimmunity. However, despite extensive efforts, satisfactory clinical outcomes have not yet been achieved. Here, we review relevant literature on the approaches that reinforce immune tolerance for lupus treatment and classify them into following categories based on their mechanisms of action: (1) directly blocking anti-dsDNA antibodies, (2) leveraging regulatory T cell-regulated B cell extrinsic tolerance, and (3) reinforcing B cell intrinsic tolerance. B cell intrinsic tolerance contains various “built-in” self-protective mechanisms that prevent B cell autoimmunity. In lupus patients, impaired B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity is a root cause of disease development. However, due to the poorly understood tolerance mechanisms, few publications have studied therapeutic approaches that restore B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity for physiological suppression of disease. To facilitate the development of such approaches, this review concludes by emphasizing a discussion of B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity, including our recent finding of a B cell intrinsic tolerance mechanism that was required to prevent lupus pathogenesis and could be pharmacologically restored to selectively suppress lupus autoimmunity in a preclinical model.

Introduction

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE or lupus) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that affects approximately 3.4 million people worldwide, of which ninety percent are women, with women of non-European ancestry being most frequently and severely affected (, ). Patients with lupus present with a wide range severity in levels of symptoms including a variety of constitutional, musculoskeletal, renal, neuropsychiatric and dermatologic manifestations (). Their mortality rate is two-or-three times higher than that of the general population (). The majority of lupus cases are sporadic, and the exact causes of lupus remain elusive and a subject of intense investigation. However, it is thought that genetic factors may predispose individuals to lupus, and that environmental factors such as exposures to UV light, cigarette smoking, infection with Epstein-Barr virus, certain medications, and social determinants that impact quality and access to health care can all trigger and exacerbate the disease (–).

Lupus is mainly mediated by autoantibodies. More specifically, it is characterized and driven by autoantibodies against nuclear components, most prominently anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA IgGs, which are highly specific for the diagnosis of lupus (). These autoantibodies appear in patients’ circulation before the clinical onset of lupus disease (). They promote inflammatory injuries in patients mainly through the formation of immune complexes with nuclear antigens, which become available to bind antinuclear antibodies due to excessive cell death, substantial release of neutrophil extracellular traps, or insufficient clearance of extracellular nuclear materials (–). These pathogenic immune complexes stimulate innate immune cells, most prominently dendritic cells, to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines such as type I interferons that are characteristic of this disease. Furthermore, they can cause organ damage, such as nephritis, by depositing in the tissue and activating the complement system. Therefore, targeting lupus autoimmunity by blocking autoantibody production or autoimmune complex formation is essential for effective suppression of lupus disease activity.

Lupus is currently incurable, and lifelong autoimmune suppression is required to control symptoms and prevent flares, which otherwise may cause disability and severe life-threatening complications (–). However, no available medications have yet been successful in selectively suppressing lupus autoimmunity. Current lupus medications include steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as antimalarial agents and biologics, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Both steroids and NSAIDs inhibit inflammatory responses through general immune suppression, which unavoidably impairs normal immune functions. In addition, they have many other toxicities, such as gastrointestinal irritation, hepatic toxicity, hypertension, weight gain, osteoporosis, etc. (, ) Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial agent that has been used as the first-line treatment for lupus for about 70 years. HCQ can reduce lupus activity without significantly increasing the risk of infection or malignancy (). Although the mechanism of action remains incompletely understood, it is thought that HCQ mainly works by inhibiting the signaling of Toll-like receptors 7 and 9 (TLR7 and TLR9) and cytokine production in immune cells (). However, HCQ also has multiple off-target adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and more severe complications, such as retinopathy and cardiotoxicity, which limit its use (–). Belimumab and Rituximab are biologics that have a general inhibitory and depletory effect on B cells, which impairs non-autoreactive B cell-mediated immune functions (, ). Similarly, recently developed anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy also non-selectively depletes B cells (, ). Therefore, the long-term standard of care for lupus inevitably harms normal immunity and other body functions, which may force reductions in dosage and duration (–). As a result, insufficient suppression of lupus autoimmunity causes frequent flares.

Immune tolerance selectively protects against autoimmunity. To improve clinical outcomes of lupus disease, different strategies are being developed to reinforce immune tolerance to lupus autoimmunity. As shown in Table 1, we classify them into following three categories based on their mechanisms: (1) directly blocking anti-dsDNA antibodies, (2) leveraging regulatory T cell (Treg)-regulated B cell extrinsic tolerance, and (3) reinforcing/restoring B cell intrinsic tolerance. The approaches in category (3) are further divided into two groups based on whether the targeted B cell intrinsic tolerance mechanisms have a known physiological role in suppressing lupus autoimmunity. Notably, the approaches of targeting B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity are least studied due to lack of knowledge of underlying mechanisms. However, this physiological strategy appears feasible and exhibits great potential for improving lupus treatment.

Table 1

Type of approachTargetReagent/MedicineReferenceMouse/HumanRelevant findings
Directly blocking anti-dsDNA antibodiesAnti-dsDNA antibodiesDWEYS peptideGaynor et al. (), 1997MousePrevented the glomerular deposition of R4A, an anti-dsDNA monoclonal antibody, in SCID mice
Huerta et al. (), 2006MouseProtected neurons from the toxic effects of autoantibody exposure in BALB/c female mice immunized with MAP.
DWEYSVWLSN peptidePutterman et al. (), 1998MouseImmunization with the peptide induced the generation of autoantibodies including anti-dsDNA IgG, anti-Histone IgG and anti-Cardiolipin IgG and renal immunoglobulin deposition in BALB/c mice.
FISLE-412Bloom et al. (), 2011MouseSuppressed pathogenic activities of lupus patients’ autoantibodies in vitro and inhibited the neurotoxicity of anti-dsDNA antibodies in C57BL/6 mice.
Analogues of FISLE-412He et al. (), 2017Mouse kidney tissueSuppressed anti-dsDNA antibody binding in the mouse kidney ex vivo.
AWLXia et al. (), 2016rat glomeruliSuppressed anti-dsDNA antibody binding in the rat glomeruli ex vivo.
Wang et al. (), 2019MouseDecreased renal IgG deposition and relevant damage in MRL/lpr mice.
Leveraging Treg-regulated B cell extrinsic toleranceTregsIL-2Humrich et al. (), 2010
Rose et al. (), 2019		MouseIL-2 induced expansion of Tregs was associated with improved disease activities in NZBWF1 mice.
La Cava A ()., 2023 (Review)
Akkur et al. (), 2025 (Review)		Mouse and HumanMultiple mouse and human studies have proved beneficial effects of low-dose IL-2, which reduced disease activity in lupus patients associated with moderately increased Tregs.
He et al. (), 2020
Humrich et al. (), 2022		HumanFailed to meet the primary endpoint in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.
Rezpegaldesleukin (PEGylated conjugate of IL-2)Kaufman et al. (), 2023HumanFailed to reduce disease activity in a clinical trial.
IL-33Mohd Jaya et al. (73), 2020MouseReduced autoantibodies and attenuated lupus development in young NZBWF1 mice.
IL-33 blocking antibodyLi et al. (74), 2014MouseIncreased Tregs and suppressed lupus activity in MRL/lpr mice
IL-6 inhibitorTackey et al. (78), 2004 (Review)Mouse and HumanMultiple studies showed that IL-6 blockade prevented increases in anti-dsDNA levels and progression of proteinuria, and improved survival in lupus prone mice. Blocking IL-6 also decreased ex vivo production of human anti-dsDNA antibodies.
Rovin et al. (79), 2016
Wallace et al. (80), 2017		HumanFailed to meet the primary endpoint in two randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trials, disproving the benefits of using IL-6 blocking antibodies for treating lupus.
mTOR pathway inhibitorRapamycinStrauss et al. (82), 2009Human cellsEfficiently expanded human Tregs in vitro.
Warner et al. (83), 1994MouseProlonged survival and inhibited pathogenesis in MRL/lpr mice.
Fernandez et al. (84), 2006HumanReduced disease activity in lupus patients
KN-93Koga et al. (87), 2014MousePromoted generation and function of Tregs in MRL/lpr mice
Otomo et al. (88), 2015MouseMitigated disease in MRL/lpr mice.
miR-125aZhang et al. (89), 2020MouseNanoparticles loaded with miR-125a could increase Tregs and alleviate disease in MRL/lpr mice.
pConsHahn et al. (90), 2001
Yu et al. (92), 2012		MousePromoted the generation of autoantigen-specific Tregs in association with reduced anti-dsDNA antibodies and relieved pathogenesis in NZBWF1 mice.
Hahn et al. (93), 2008Human cellsCaused the expansion of Tregs in cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from lupus patients.
hCDR1 (Edratide)Sharabi et al. (97), 2006MouseAdoptive transfer of hCDR1-treated cells and hCDR1-treated cells enriched with CD4+CD25+ cells significantly reduced proteinuria and glomerular immune complex deposits in NZBWF1 mice.
Urowitz et al. (98), 2015HumanThe primary endpoints based on SLEDAI-2K and AMS were not met in a clinical trial.
Nucleosomal histone peptidesKang et al. (99), 2005MouseReduced autoantibody, delayed nephritis and prolonged life span in lupus prone (SWR x NZB) F1 mice. Adoptive transfer of Tregs induced by nucleosomal histone peptides had similar beneficial effects in mice.
Zhang et al. (101), 2013HumanTransfer of Tregs induced by nucleosomal histone peptides suppressed lupus pathogenesis in patients.
Other histone-derived peptidesWu et al. (102), 2002
Wu et al. (103), 2004
Shapira et al. (104), 2011		MouseHad similar Treg-associated beneficial effects in lupus-prone mice, such as suppressing the production of autoantibodies and reducing the severity of glomerulonephritis.
Reinforcing B cell intrinsic tolerance by leveraging the inhibitory mechanisms with unknown relevance to lupusAnti-dsDNA B cellsdsDNA/anti-dsDNA antibody complexLebrun et al. (154), 1994
Burny et al. (155), 1997		MouseExtended survival, decreased anti-dsDNA antibody production and reduced severity of nephritis in MRL/lpr mice.
LJP-394 (Abetimus sodium)Horowitz et al. (157), 2009 (Review)Mouse and HumanBoth mouse and human studies showed that LJP-394 reduced the titers of anti-dsDNA antibodies and the numbers of anti-dsDNA B cells.
Mosca et al. (158), 2007 (Review)HumanMultiple studies showed that LJP could reduce anti-dsDNA antibodies and disease activities in lupus patients.
Furie et al. (159), 2006
Cardiel et al. (160), 2008		HumanFailed to demonstrate statistically significant prolongations in time to renal flare. Thus, failed to meet its primary endpoint in two pivotal clinical trials.
Restoring B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunityFcγRIIbDNA-mimicking peptide/anti-FcγRIIb antibody complexTchorbanov et al. (175), 2007MouseSelectively silenced DNA-specific B cells and delayed lupus activity in MRL/lpr mice
Histone 1 peptide/anti-FcγRIIb antibody complexMihaylova et al. (177), 2008MouseReduced anti-Histone 1 antibodies, albuminuria, and the size of lymphoid organs and prevented skin lesions in MRL/lpr mice.
SMS2/PKCδ pathway2OHOAOu et al. (180), 2021MouseSignificantly reduced anti-dsDNA antibodies and relieved lupus pathogenesis without the reduction of total IgGs in NZBWF1 mice.
BAFF-receptor-Ig, BelimumabJackson et al. (236), 2019 (Review)Mouse and HumanBAFF inhibition with BAFF-receptor-Ig in lupus-prone mice and with Belimumab in patients exhibited a similar modest and apparent effect on the antigen-activated autoreactive B cell repertoire.
BelimumabHuang et al. (230), 2018HumanPatients received a long-term belimumab treatment had a modest reduction in the frequency of activated autoreactive B cells, but not inactive autoreactive B cells, suggesting the possible involvement of overexpressed BAFF in inhibiting GC B cell tolerance.

Published approaches to selective suppression of lupus autoimmunity.

Directly blocking anti-dsDNA antibodies

Given that anti-dsDNA antibodies are the key driving force in lupus pathogenesis (), directly blocking them was logical and one of the first strategies explored for new treatment options. By screening a phage peptide display library, B. Diamond’s group pioneered this approach and identified DWEYS, a peptide that is recognized by R4A, an anti-dsDNA monoclonal antibody with known renal pathogenicity. This DWEYS peptide inhibited R4A’s DNA binding and prevented the deposition of R4A in mouse glomeruli (). In addition, DWEYS protects neurons from the toxic effects of antibody exposure (). Further ex vivo studies showed that DWEYS could inhibit lupus patients’ anti-dsDNA antibodies from binding to DNA, supporting its therapeutic potential (). However, despite the encouraging results, immunization with a similar R4A-specific peptide DWEYSVWLSN induced the generation of autoantibodies and renal immunoglobulin deposition in mice (), raising concerns that this treatment strategy posed the risk of further enhancement of autoimmunity.

Later, FISLE-412 was developed as a small molecule peptidomimetic based on the structural features of DWEYS that neutralizes anti-dsDNA/NMDAR, but with more stability, oral availability and less immunogenicity than its precursor (). Like DWEYS, FISLE-412 was able to block patient anti-dsDNA antibodies in vitro and ex vivo, as well as inhibit markers of lupus pathogenesis in mice (, ). Similarly, ALW (ALWPPNLHAWVP) is another such peptide that inhibits anti-dsDNA antibodies (). ALW was developed with a screen against a panel of murine IgG anti-DNA antibodies of different isotypes with varied renal pathogenicity. ALW inhibited the binding of anti-dsDNA antibodies to mesangial cells and glomeruli in vitro and ameliorated lupus nephritis in the MRL/lpr mouse (). Though FISLE-412 and ALW showed more promise over previous peptide based approaches (), effective translation into clinical use has yet to be reported, possibly due to the concern of potential immunogenicity.

Leveraging Treg-regulated B cell extrinsic tolerance

B cell extrinsic tolerance consists of two main avenues that may prevent the activation of autoreactive B cells: (1) the absence of T cell help from antigen-cognate CD4+ helper T cells due to elimination of autoreactive T cells through T cell tolerance, and (2) the suppression of autoreactive B cells by Tregs (–). T cells play important roles in lupus pathogenesis as anti-nucleosome T cells seen in lupus have been hypothesized to aid the generation of antibodies that target nuclear antigens like dsDNA (, ), and that some T cell inhibitors showed encouraging results in clinical studies (). However, effective CD4+ helper T cell-specific targeted therapy has yet to be reported, and several clinical trials targeting T cell-dependent pathways, such as blocking co-stimulatory pathways, did not meet their endpoints (–).

In contrast, dysregulated Tregs have been considered to be an important factor contributing to insufficient peripheral B cell tolerance in lupus (). Tregs have the ability to induce peripheral tolerance to self-antigens in lupus by releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β, or by suppressing autoreactive B cells via direct interaction (–). Therefore, leveraging Treg-regulated B cell extrinsic tolerance to suppress lupus autoimmunity has been actively pursued as a targeted therapy (–). Studies have shown that the transfer of Tregs was effective in the suppression of disease progression in lupus-prone NZBWF1 mice (–), as well as in a humanized mouse model of lupus (), justifying the pursuit of a potential therapeutic intervention. Interestingly, the transfer of self-antigen specific Tregs seemed to have higher specificity and activity to suppress self-antigen-induced pro-inflammatory responses (). However, as the humanized mouse model used in this study did not support the survival of transplanted B cells, whether self-antigen specific Tregs would have any beneficial effects on B cell tolerance is unknown.

In addition to the transfer of Tregs, bolstering or restoring Tregs with IL-2 has been extensively investigated for treating lupus (, ). IL-2 is critical for expanding and maintaining CD25+ Treg populations (); defective IL-2 signaling in mice results in reduced Treg populations, contributing to several autoimmune phenotypes (, ). IL-2 treatment prevented the decrease of Tregs in lupus-prone mice (), and IL-2 induced Treg expansion was associated with improved disease activities (, ). Lymphocytes from lupus patients had decreased production and responsiveness to IL-2 in culture (). Multiple clinical studies originally showed therapeutic effects of low-dose IL-2, which reduced disease activity in association with moderately increased Tregs (, ). Given that therapeutic efficacy of low-dose IL-2 was possibly linked to the inhibition of Tfh and Th17 cells, the contribution of IL-2 to each of these cell populations in relation to the overall outcomes remains to be defined. Despite the positive results achieved by early clinical studies, both single-center and multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials failed to meet the primary endpoints (, ). Similarly, a recent clinical trial of Rezpegaldesleukin, a PEGylated conjugate of recombinant human IL-2, failed to reduce disease activity in lupus patients (). These compelling results challenged the effectiveness of targeting IL-2-regulated Tregs for lupus treatment. In addition, they indicate that insufficient IL-2 alone does not drive lupus pathogenesis, which is also supported by the fact that only half (54.8%) of lupus patients had low levels of serum IL-2, compared to 11% in the healthy individuals ().

Other cytokines that regulate Treg activity have also been explored as targets for lupus treatment. Like IL-2, IL-33 also expands Tregs both in vivo and in vitro (). IL-33 administration reduced autoantibodies in NZBWF1 mice (73). A caveat to this finding is that IL-33 is a member of the IL-1 family, which is known to promote proinflammatory responses; inhibition of IL-33, but not IL-33 administration, increased Tregs and suppressed lupus activity in MRL/lpr mice (74). In contrast to IL-2 and IL-33, IL-6 is elevated in lupus patients and correlates with disease activity (75). IL-6 inhibits Tregs via upregulating Th17 cells (76). Additionally, IL-6 can induce B cell hyperactivity, autoantibody production and inflammation (77). Indeed, IL-6 blockade reduced disease activity in multiple mouse models of lupus (78). Unfortunately, two randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trials of using IL-6 blocking antibodies for treating lupus in patients did not show benefits (79, 80).

Intracellular pathways also have been targeted to increase Tregs for lupus treatment and have showed positive results. For example, capitalizing on the observations that overactivation of mTORC1 resulted in defective Tregs (81), and that conversely, inhibition of mTORC1 by rapamycin expanded human Tregs in vitro (82), studies showed that rapamycin could relieve lupus pathogenesis in MRL/lpr mice and lupus patients (83, 84). Later, a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial showed that lupus patients receiving rapamycin had a progressive improvement of disease activity associated with reduced production of IgM and IgA antiphospholipid antibodies (85). Although a retrospective study of 4-year rapamycin treatment showed acceptable tolerance and safety (86), unavoidable inhibition of mTOR-regulated normal functions remains a concern. In agreement with the effectiveness of rapamycin, inhibition of CaMK4, an upstream regulator of mTOR, also increased Tregs and mitigated disease in MRL/lpr mice (87, 88). In addition, targeting this intracellular pathway with miR-125a consistently increased Tregs and alleviated disease in MRL/lpr mice (89), supporting the further exploration of this promising approach to treat lupus and other autoimmune diseases.

Interestingly, the peptides derived from anti-DNA antibodies, such as “consensus“ peptide (pCons) and human complementarity-determining region 1 (hCDR1), also promote the generation of Tregs (90, 91). pCons was an artificial sequence whose design was based on a consensus of T cell stimulatory amino acid sequences derived from the VH regions of several anti-DNA IgGs found in NZBWF1 mice. Administration of pCons promoted the generation of Tregs in association with reduced anti-dsDNA antibodies and relieved pathogenesis in lupus-prone mice (90, 92), and caused the expansion of Tregs in cultured lupus patients’ blood cells (93). However, clinical effectiveness of pCons has yet to be reported. hCDR1 has multiple potential mechanisms of action that are thought to benefit lupus treatment (91, 94–96), but its effects on upregulating Tregs and TGF-beta are essential (97). hCDR1 showed clinically significant effects in some patients but failed to meet its primary endpoints in a phase II clinical trial (98). In addition to autoantibody-derived peptides, peptides containing epitopes of nucleosomal histones also promoted Treg responses and relieved lupus nephritis in lupus prone (SWR x NZB) F1 mice (99). The transfer of Tregs induced by these peptides suppressed lupus autoimmunity in lupus patients (100, 101). Other histone-derived peptides showed similar beneficial effects (102–104).

Overall, while animal studies and early-stage clinical studies have demonstrated exciting beneficial effects of leveraging Treg-mediated B cell extrinsic tolerance to treat lupus, definitive clinical evidence supporting such approaches has yet to be achieved. In addition, Treg deficiency does not appear to be a common defect in lupus patients. Although multiple studies showed decreased proportions of Tregs in lupus patients (105–112), one study reported unchanged proportion of Tregs (113), and some even reported increases in that numbers (114–117). Similarly, the quality of Tregs in lupus has been disputed as well (108, 114, 115). Given the disparate evidence, including inconsistent clinical study results, the potential significance of leveraging Treg-regulated B cell extrinsic tolerance for lupus treatment remains uncertain.

B cell intrinsic tolerance checkpoints

The random nature of recombination of variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) (VDJ) segments and somatic hypermutation (SHM) diversifies B cell receptor (BCR) specificities for protecting against a virtually limitless array of pathogens (118), but also generates autoreactive BCRs as a by-product (119–121). However, B cell intrinsic tolerance deletes or deactivates those autoreactive B cells at multiple checkpoints in B cell development to prevent autoimmune disorders (122–125).

In the bone marrow, up to 75% BCRs generated at this stage exhibit reactivity to self-antigens (121, 126). Central B cell tolerance removes the BCRs possessing high-avidity interactions with self-antigens by various mechanisms including: clonal deletion, anergy and receptor editing (127), among which receptor editing seems to play a dominant role (128, 129). In the periphery, BCR signaling-mediated clonal deletion and anergy remove most remaining autoreactive B cells during the development of transitional, marginal zone and follicular B cells (130). Both follicular and marginal zone B cells participate in the GC response (131). Follicular B cells are the primary B cells that undergo SHM to generate BCRs with high-affinity to foreign antigens as well as autoreactive BCRs. Marginal zone B cells are also able to undergo SHM and generate T cell–independent immune responses, including autoimmunity (132). However, SHM-generated autoreactive GC B cells are negatively selected by a stringent but poorly understood mechanism to guarantee the expansion of B cells with high affinity to foreign antigens (123, 133).

Notably, although defects in both central and peripheral B cell tolerance have been found in lupus patients, accumulating evidence supports a central role of loss of GC B cell tolerance in lupus pathogenesis. Studies of lupus patients and animal models showed that most of their autoreactive B cells had extensive SHM, and reversing SHM point mutations removes lupus autoimmunity in the B cells (134–139). These convincing results indicate that lupus autoimmunity is primarily generated by SHM, which highlights an essential role of GC B cell tolerance in preventing lupus disease. However, the mechanisms of GC B cell tolerance and the causes of their insufficiency in lupus patients are poorly understood, impeding the approaches to pharmacologic restoration of lupus patients’ GC B cell tolerance for physiologically suppressing lupus autoimmunity.

Consistent with the critical protective role of GC B cell tolerance in lupus disease, the extrafollicular (EF) responses, which lack stringent B cell tolerance checkpoints, have been recognized as a driver of lupus pathogenesis (140). Precursors of lupus autoreactive B cells are thought to arise within these EF responses. Specifically, IgD-CD27- double-negative (DN) B cells, a characteristic population in lupus, have DN2 (CD11c+CXCR5-) and DN3 (CD11c-CXCR5-) subsets that differentiate in EF responses (141–143). DN2 cells are sensitive to TLR7 signaling, which predisposes mice and humans to lupus autoimmunity (144), and these cells account for the expansion of DN cells in African-American patients with active lupus disease (145). Notably, DN2 cells exhibit strong similarities with CD11c+T-bet+ age-associated B cells (ABCs), which arise from both GC and EF responses. ABCs are also driven by TLR7 signaling and recognized as the precursors of lupus autoreactive B cells (146). Compared to DN2 cells, DN3 cells have been less studied in the context of lupus. However, a recent study showed that the increase of DN3 cells, but not DN2 cells, was tightly associated with lupus disease activity, suggesting a potentially more important role for DN3 cells in the disease (147). Given that EF responses, as well as DN cells, are particularly sensitive to TLR7 signaling (144, 145, 148, 149), blocking TLR7 signaling is a reasonable approach to suppress lupus autoimmunity. In a recent phase II clinical trial (NCT05162586) for lupus treatment, Enpatoran, a selective TLR7/8 inhibitor, did lead to a reduction in inflammatory markers and improve cutaneous manifestations of lupus. However, it did not meet its primary endpoint to dampen systemic effects, suggesting other mediators/pathways are involved. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to fully elucidate the roles of EF responses and DN2/DN3 cells in the context of lupus treatment.

It is also worth mentioning that the exons encoding the variable regions of lupus autoantibodies typically possess a high load of SHM, a hallmark of GC maturation, contrasting with the low level of SHM observed in DN B cells derived from activated naïve B cells (140–142). However, this discrepancy can be potentially reconciled by studies suggesting that GC-derived memory B cells may acquire DN2 cells’ features and transform into DN2-like cells under inflammatory conditions (150, 151). In this scenario, insufficient GC tolerance can indirectly contribute to the emergence of DN2/DN3 cells in EF responses. Therefore, restoring GC B cell tolerance may serve as a potential strategy against DN2/DN3 cells by blocking the initial development of autoreactive memory B cells in the GC.

Reinforcing B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity by leveraging inhibitory mechanisms with unknown physiological relevance to lupus

B cell intrinsic tolerance is manifested in various self-protective mechanisms including those with known or unknown physiological relevance to lupus autoimmunity. Although restoring B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity is considered an ideal strategy for lupus treatment (152), due to its incompletely understood mechanisms, early therapeutic approaches focused on engineering “artificial” B cell intrinsic tolerance to dsDNA by capitalizing on general B cell inhibitory mechanisms with no established physiological connection to human lupus.

For example, based on the observation that the idiotype-induced generation of anti-idiotypic antibodies may in turn reduce the production of antibodies carrying the idiotype (153), P. Lebrun et al. attempted to use a complex composed of dsDNA for targeting anti-dsDNA B cells and an anti-dsDNA antibody to suppress the production of anti-dsDNA antibodies by anti-dsDNA B cells (154, 155). The authors reported that lupus prone MRL/lpr mice treated with this complex had significantly prolonged survival associated with reduced morphological signs of nephritis (154). A later study confirmed that this treatment reduced the production of anti-dsDNA antibodies and the severity of nephritis in MRL/lpr mice compared to control (155). However, the mechanism underlying this approach is unclear, and there are no reports of further clinical studies. Notably, a study showed that antibodies specific for a particular antigen enhanced helper T cell proliferation in response to the stimulation by the same antigen (156), suggesting the possible enhancement of an autoimmune response by this approach, which would not be desirable for treating lupus.

The mechanism of antigen specific elimination of self-reactive B cells is critical in central and peripheral B cell tolerance (127, 130), as it removes BCRs with high affinity for self-antigens if they are engaged without co-stimulatory signals. This general inhibitory mechanism in B cells is not specific for preventing lupus, but it was used as a basis to design tolerogens that would impose B cell intrinsic tolerance to dsDNA. For example, LJP-394, a dsDNA tolerogen, was developed to delete or deactivate anti-dsDNA B cells. LJP-394 consists of four identical 20-mer dsDNA epitopes covalently linked to a small non-immunogenic carrier to avoid inducing autoantibody generation (157). LJP-394 could selectively crosslink anti-dsDNA BCRs to induce anergy or apoptosis in anti-dsDNA B cells, resulting in B cell tolerance given the absence of T cell help. More than ten clinical studies showed that LJP-394 reduced anti-dsDNA antibodies and disease activities (158). However, in pivotal clinical trials, LJP-394 failed to meet its primary endpoint (157, 159, 160). Despite the fact that LJP-394 reduced almost 50% serum anti-dsDNA antibody titers in patients with lupus, it could not delay or reduce the time to renal flare in patients that had high affinity antibodies to its dsDNA epitopes. Therefore, even up to a 50% reduction of anti-dsDNA antibodies could not generate a satisfactory clinical outcome. The cause of LJP-394’s insufficient efficacy is unclear. It is possible that the mechanism of antigen specific tolerance is not fully active or attenuated at the B cell development stage when anti-dsDNA B cells arise in lupus, reducing the efficacy of this approach. However, the encouraging results achieved were a significant advancement towards selective and effective suppression of lupus autoimmunity.

Reinforcing FcγRIIb-regulated B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity

FcγRIIb receptor possesses the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM), which negatively regulates B cell activation and antibody production by interacting with the BCR ITAM motif (161). FcγRIIb deficient mice have an increased susceptibility to autoimmune diseases including arthritis, Goodpasture’s syndrome and lupus (162–165). Although initial studies of FcγRIIb deficient mice observed a strain-dependent lupus-like phenotype (166), later studies showed that this phenotype was contingent on the involvement of other genes (162, 163). Many studies focused on the tolerance role of FcγRIIb in GC and post GC responses (167–171), and a recent study showed that B cell specific FcγRIIb deficient mice exhibited aberrant marginal zone activation and extrafollicular autoreactive plasma cell responses with increased serum anti-dsDNA IgGs (172). Lupus patients have about 40% reduction of FcγRIIb expression in marginal zone B cells (172), and it is not clear how this reduced expression may affect FcγRIIb-regulated GC B cell tolerance. Nevertheless, FcγRIIb overexpression in B cells suppressed lupus autoimmunity in mice (173, 174), supporting the approach of targeting FcγRIIb in autoreactive B cells for lupus treatment.

FcγRIIb is expressed on many different cell types. To activate FcγRIIb selectively in lupus autoreactive B cells, a complex containing a DNA-mimicking peptide (DWEYSVWLSN) for targeting anti-dsDNA B cells and an anti-FcγRIIb monoclonal antibody for activating FcγRIIb’s inhibitory activity was generated (175). Indeed, in sick MRL/lpr mice treated with this complex, levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies did not increase, and aggravation of lupus glomerulonephritis was delayed. A similar complex composed of anti-FcγRIIb antibody and histone 1 peptide was made to inhibit anti-histone-1 B cells (176). This complex reduced anti-histone-1 antibodies and albuminuria, and prevented the development of skin lesions in MRL/lpr mice (177). In addition to treatment with anti-FcγRIIb antibodies and fusion proteins alone, combined treatment with bortezomib, a cytotoxic agent, showed beneficial effects in a preclinical model (178). Inhibitory complement receptor type 1 (CD35) in anti-dsDNA B cells was also targeted to inhibit anti-dsDNA B cells. A complex containing an anti-CD35 monoclonal antibody and a DNA-mimicking peptide decreased the number of anti-dsDNA antibody producing B cells in cultured lupus patients’ PBMCs (179). However, despite these promising observations, the therapeutic effects of these complexes in lupus prone mice were considered as partial successes, and there were no further clinical studies reported.

Restoring SMS2/PKCδ-regulated GC B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity

The SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway prevents lupus pathogenesis but is attenuated in lupus prone mice and lupus patients

We have reported a novel mechanism of GC B cell tolerance that prevents lupus autoimmunity in mice (180). Sphingomyelin synthase 2 (SMS2) and protein kinase C δ (PKCδ) are two key regulators of this B cell intrinsic tolerance mechanism. SMS2 is a plasma membrane enzyme that produces sphingomyelin (SM) and diacylglycerol (DAG) by transferring phosphocholine from phosphatidylcholine onto ceramide (181). We showed that compared to B cells at other stages, GC B cells in the light zone (LZ), where negative selection occurs, have increased SMS2. Notably, more highly upregulated SMS2 was specifically found in anti-dsDNA B cells located in the LZ. SMS2 deficiency resulted in a lupus-like phenotype in C57/BL6 mice, which was associated with significantly increased frequency of anti-dsDNA GC B cells and ABCs, indicating that SMS2 preferentially prevents the survival of GC B cells possessing lupus autoimmunity (180). Mechanistically, SMS2 formed a complex with PKCδ to allow SMS2-derived DAG to activate PKCδ nuclear translocation, which is known to phosphorylate histone 2B and cause subsequent apoptosis in B cells (182). Consistent with these findings, nuclear PKCδ was observed in anti-dsDNA GC B cells of C57/BL6 mice, and SMS2 deficiency preferentially impaired PKCδ nuclear translocation and apoptosis in anti-dsDNA GC B cells (180). Moreover, GC B cell specific PKCδ deficient mice had a similar lupus phenotype with increased frequency of anti-dsDNA GC B cells. This tolerance mechanism is B cell intrinsic: adoptive transfer of SMS2 deficient naïve B cells into mature B cell deficient (μ deficient) mice resulted in increased anti-dsDNA GC B cells, which was not observed when WT naïve B cells were transferred into SMS2 and μ deficient mice (180).

Notably, DAG can be generated by other enzymes in B cells as well. For example, phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLCγ2), a critical component of BCR signaling pathways, converts the plasma membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and DAG. It was suggested that PLCγ2-derived DAG could activate PKC epsilon (ε) (183), a novel PKC implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis (184). However, we found that SMS2 deficient B cells had significantly reduced plasma membrane DAG, indicating that DAG generated by other enzymes cannot compensate for the loss of DAG derived from SMS2. In addition, the specific physical interaction between SMS2 and PKCδ could facilitate the direct transfer of DAG from SMS2 to PKCδ (180), which further explains the requirement of SMS2 for the activation of PKCδ nuclear translocation.

PKCδ nuclear translocation appears to be GC B cell specific since nuclear PKCδ was undetectable in untouched and uncultured naïve B cells (180, 182). However, in addition to GC B cells, PKCδ is also involved in the tolerance regulation at the immature B cell stage in the bone marrow and at the transitional B cell stage in the periphery, though not via its nuclear translocation. In bone marrow B cells and transitional B cells, PKCδ was required to sensitize B cells to negative selection via activating proapoptotic Ca2+-dependent Erk signaling (185, 186). However, no evidence supports that this particular tolerance mechanism is required for preventing lupus autoimmunity. Rather, the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway in the GC is a PKCδ mediated tolerance mechanism that protects against lupus autoimmunity. This is also supported by our evidence that GC B cell specific PKCδ deficient mice exhibit a lupus-like phenotype and that activation of SMS2 restored GC B cell PKCδ nuclear translocation and alleviated lupus pathogenesis in NZBWF1 mice (180).

The significance of the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway in humans was validated by showing that SMS2 expression in lupus patients’ B cells and ABCs are reduced more than 90% (180), and hypomorphic mutations in PRKCD cause lupus pathogenesis in patients (187–190). Furthermore, in line with the female biased lupus-like phenotype in NZBWF1 mice (191), we found that female NZBWF1 mice had significantly reduced SMS2 expression in GC B cells compared to the male littermates (SS and CH, unpublished observations), which is associated with impaired PKCδ nuclear translocation in these cells (180). These results suggest that the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway is functionally conserved in humans and mice.

Potential regulation of the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway

To understand the regulation of the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway, we examined the regulation of B cell SMS2 expression given that the transcription of SGMS2, which encodes human SMS2, is drastically reduced in lupus patients’ B cells. We found that the signaling of BCR, TLR9 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) all upregulate the transcription of mouse SMS2 gene, Sgms2, in cultured mouse B cells (180).

In addition to B cell activation, the BCR plays an essential role in central B cell tolerance (127). Immature autoreactive B cells that have high-avidity interactions with self-antigen stop their development due to high BCR signaling. These B cells then rearrange and express new light chains to avoid binding with self-antigens. If successful, they will resume B cell development. If self-reactivity remains, they will undergo apoptosis or anergy. In peripheral B cell tolerance, self-antigen-induced BCR signaling, such as the Lyn-SHIP-1-SHP-1 pathway, has an inhibitory effect that prevents the activation of autoreactive B cells including lupus autoreactive B cells (130). In line with these observations, we found that BCR signaling upregulated SMS2 and induced PKCδ-mediated apoptosis in cultured B cells (180), suggesting the involvement of BCR signaling in regulation of the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway.

Given that Sgms2 transcription in macrophages was strongly activated by the stimulation of TLR9 (192), a pathogen pattern recognition receptor for microbial dsDNA, we studied if stimulation of TLR9 induced SMS2 expression in B cells and compared it to the stimulation of TLR7, a key sensor of single-stranded RNA for triggering antiviral responses. Studies have showed that B cell intrinsic TLR9 and TLR7 play opposing physiologic roles in autoantibody production (193). B cell specific TLR9 deficiency aggravated nephritis in MRL/lpr mice, whereas B cell-specific TLR9 overexpression ameliorated nephritis (194). However, B cell specific TLR7 deficiency significantly relieved disease in B cell specific TLR9 deficient MRL/lpr mice (195). Consistently, a TLR7 gain-of-function mutation causes lupus in humans and mice (196). In agreement with these results, we found that TLR9 stimulation highly upregulated B cell SMS2, but TLR7 stimulation had a minor effect on B cell SMS2 (180). Importantly, upregulation of B cell SMS2 by TLR9 helps clarify why the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway is more specifically activated in anti-dsDNA GC B cells.

Interestingly, we also found that ROS increased SMS2 expression and SMS2-dependent PKCδ nuclear localization in culture B cells (180). We showed that the ROS level was significantly higher in GC LZ B cells compared to GC dark zone (DZ) B cells, which helps explain increased SMS2 expression in LZ B cells. Therefore, observed involvement of BCR, TLR9 and ROS signaling in promoting Sgms2 transcription supports the SMS2/PKCδ pathway’s tolerance role in the GC. The regulation of B cell SMS2 expression by other unknown signaling pathways cannot be excluded. Future studies are needed to fully understand the downregulation of B cell SMS2 expression in lupus patients. In addition to reduced B cell SMS2 expression, a possible reduction of SMS2 activity in lupus B cells cannot be excluded, as we found that pharmacologic activation of SMS2 restored PKCδ nuclear translocation in the GC B cells of lupus prone NZBWF1 mice (180). Therefore, the studies of SMS2 activity in lupus patients’ B cells are needed as well.

It has been shown that PKCδ nuclear translocation in B cells was blocked by B cell activating factor (BAFF) (182), which is often overexpressed and closely linked with disease activity in lupus patients (197, 198). BAFF is well known for its activity to promote lupus autoimmunity (199); BAFF transgenic mice exhibit a lupus-like phenotype with impaired B cell tolerance (200). Therefore, we postulate that overexpressed BAFF inhibits the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway. In addition to BAFF, other upregulated cytokines known to promote lupus autoimmunity, such as type I interferons (IFNs), may possibly regulate B cell PKCδ nuclear translocation as well. This is because IFNs regulate PKCδ activation (201–203), and IFN-beta can rapidly reverse nuclear translocation of PKCδ in T cells (204). A study of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) deficient mice also suggested the presence of other unknown inhibitors of PKCδ nuclear translocation in B cells (205). TRAF3 deficient mice exhibit a lupus-like phenotype associated with impaired PKCδ nuclear translocation in B cells, but with an unknown mechanism. Given well-recognized role of upregulated BAFF and IFN signaling in promoting lupus pathogenesis, confirming their inhibitory effects on PKCδ nuclear translocation in GC B cells may provide important insights into impaired GC B cell tolerance in lupus and further justify the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway as a therapeutic target for lupus treatment.

Restoring the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway with 2OHOA

2-hydroxyoleic acid (2OHOA) is an orally bioavailable SMS activator (206–209), which is being studied in a clinical trial for glioma treatment in Europe. The use of 2OHOA for glioma treatment is based on the finding that reduced SMS2 expression promotes survival of glioma cells (207, 208). A report of its phase I/IIa results confirmed that 2OHOA is safe and nontoxic (206). We therefore repurposed 2OHOA as an activator of the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway for lupus treatment.

How 2OHOA activates SMS is not completely understood. SMS1 and SMS2 are two main isoforms of SMS enzymes in mammalian cells. SMS1 is located on the Golgi membrane, and SMS2 is predominantly situated on the plasma membrane (181). Analysis of both human SMS isoforms’ tertiary structures predicated by deep learning-based folding algorithms suggested that 2OHOA preferentially activates SMS2 (210). This is because the incorporation of 2OHOA into ceramide generates hydroxylated ceramide, which is largely favored in the interaction with SMS2, but not SMS1, and this interaction can lead to increased sphingomyelin and DAG in the plasma membrane. Consistently, we found that 2OHOA upregulated plasma membrane DAG in B cells in a SMS2 dependent manner (180). This is likely due to upregulated SMS2 activity, as 2OHOA did not increase SMS2 expression in B cells. Interestingly, despite most reports that 2OHOA upregulates SMS activity, a study showed that 2OHOA failed to increase SMS activity in certain cancer cells, but reduced cellular phosphatidylcholine instead (211). This result, however, aligns with recently reported new functions of SMS enzymes, namely, the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine (212–214). Notably, these two reactions also generate DAG as a by-product. Therefore, SMS2 may utilize different mechanisms to generate DAG. More studies are needed to fully understand how 2OHOA stimulates SMS2 to produce DAG in autoreactive B cells.

In sum, 2OHOA appears to be a potent activator of the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway. In spite of reduced GC B cell SMS2 in female NZBWF1 mice, we reported that pharmacologic activation of the remaining GC B cell SMS2 in female NZBWF1 mice with a half dose of 2OHOA used for glioma treatment in mice was still able to restore PKCδ nuclear translocation in their GC B cells and relieve lupus pathogenesis without decreasing total IgGs or causing other obvious adverse effects (180). As predicted, 2OHOA’s therapeutic effects depended on the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway since 2OHOA could not suppress lupus autoimmunity in SMS2 deficient mice, PKCδ deficient mice, or GC B cell-specific PKCδ deficient mice (180). These results support that the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway can be targeted by 2OHOA to selectively and effectively suppress lupus autoimmunity.

Restoring the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway with belimumab

Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits BAFF, has been approved for lupus treatment by the FDA. However, despite its effective blockade of BAFF, which is frequently overexpressed in lupus patients and promotes lupus autoimmunity (215–217), belimumab is only indicated as an “add-on” therapy with standard of care treatments of lupus because it has moderate efficacy (218–223).

Overexpressed BAFF is thought to dysregulate negative selection of autoreactive B cells (224); studies have showed that overexpressed BAFF rescued the maturation of autoreactive cells from the negative selection at transitional B cell stage (225, 226). In the GC, the role of BAFF in B cell tolerance is poorly understood, but blockade of BAFF signaling significantly reduced GC T follicular helper cells and GC B cells in autoimmune-prone BCMA-deficient B6.Nba2 mice (227). A recent study showed that BAFF promotes GC formation, which was dependent on BR3 expression on both T cells and B cells (228). Consistently, the progression of GC responses was found to be attenuated in BAFF or BAFF-R signaling deficient mice (229). A clinical study of a long-term belimumab treatment suggested a possible involvement of overexpressed BAFF in inhibiting GC B cell tolerance, as treated patients had a modest reduction in the frequency of activated autoreactive B cells, but not inactive autoreactive B cells (230). Along with the fact that overexpressed BAFF promotes lupus autoimmunity (199, 200), it is possible that overexpressed BAFF may inhibit the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway in lupus patients. This hypothetical model provides an explanation of belimumab’s moderate efficacy. Because BAFF blockade by belimumab may not be enough to restore the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway due to significantly reduced SMS2. This view is supported by the observation that in female NZBWF1 mice, which have upregulated serum BAFF levels and reduced GC B cell SMS2 expression (SS and CH, unpublished observations) (231–233), BAFF blockade with BAFF-receptor-Ig could not reverse, but delayed and limited lupus pathogenesis, without a significant reduction of anti-dsDNA antibodies (234–236). Therefore, a possible approach to addressing moderate efficacy of belimumab is to activate SMS2 with 2OHOA, which we reported as able to restore PKCδ nuclear translocation in GC B cells of female NZBWF1 mice (180).

Summary

The well-recognized adverse effects of current lupus medications indicate an urgent need of novel alternative therapeutic approaches that selectively suppress lupus autoimmunity. As summarized in Table 1, long-term efforts have been made to selectively target lupus autoimmunity by reinforcing immune tolerance in various ways. Among them, approaches directly blocking anti-dsDNA antibodies, leveraging Treg-mediated B cell extrinsic tolerance, and reinforcing B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity by leveraging inhibitory mechanisms with unknown physiological connection to lupus, have been extensively studied but not yet achieved satisfactory clinical effectiveness. In contrast, restoring physiological B cell intrinsic tolerance to SHM-derived autoreactive BCRs has been barely studied despite SHM being identified as the main generator of lupus autoimmunity. This is largely because of poorly understood mechanisms of GC B cell tolerance. The SMS2/PKCδ pathway regulates GC B cell tolerance, as it functions in the GC LZ and its impairments result in a lupus-like phenotype in mice. In addition, evidence suggests that insufficiency in the SMS2/PKCδ pathway is a common defect in lupus patients. To further justify the therapeutic approach to restoring the SMS2/PKCδ pathway for lupus treatment, more studies are needed to demonstrate that this tolerance pathway is a major self-protective mechanism protecting against lupus autoimmunity in humans.

Our earlier discovery showed that restoring the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway could effectively and specifically suppress lupus autoimmunity in NZBWF1 mice, supporting that targeting GC B cell intrinsic tolerance alone is sufficient to relieve lupus pathogenesis in mice. However, lupus disease in humans is well known for its complexity and heterogeneity (–), and medications targeting single agents are rarely successful. We believe that the SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway can be potentially complemented by the mechanisms of action of other medications to generate synergistic therapeutic effects. For example, concurrent reinforcement of B cell intrinsic and extrinsic tolerance by activation of both SMS2/PKCδ pathway and Tregs may maximize the strength of B cell tolerance to lupus autoimmunity. In addition, combination of the activation of the SMS2/PKCδ pathway with current lupus medications has the potential to enhance therapeutic effectiveness while reducing adverse events by allowing for a reduction in therapeutic doses of current medications. In summary, we believe that restoring patients’ physiological B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity is feasible and presents a viable and effective strategy to overcome the serious challenge of adverse effects in current medications, therefore representing a new direction for lupus treatment.

Statements

Author contributions

SS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SC: Writing – review & editing. EH: Writing – original draft. PK: Writing – review & editing. MF: Writing – review & editing. CR: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. CH: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. NIMHD under Award Number 1U54MD017979 SUNY DHSU Seed Grant Award Number 81424.

Conflict of interest

Authors CH and CR declared that they are inventors of a patent (no. US11771672B2) entitled “Use of 2-Hydroxyoleic Acid for the Treatment of System Lupus Erythematosus and Other Immune Pathologies”, owned by The Research Foundation for the State University of New York.

The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    BarberMRWFalasinnuTRamsey-GoldmanRClarkeAE. The global epidemiology of SLE: narrowing the knowledge gaps. Rheumatol (Oxford England). (2023) 62:i4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac610

  • 2

    SiegelCHSammaritanoLR. Systemic lupus erythematosus: A review. JAMA. (2024) 331:1480–91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.2315

  • 3

    LeeYHChoiSJJiJDSongGG. Overall and cause-specific mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus: an updated meta-analysis. Lupus. (2016) 25:727–34. doi: 10.1177/0961203315627202

  • 4

    ChuaMHYNgIATL-CheungMWMA. Association between cigarette smoking and systemic lupus erythematosus: an updated multivariate bayesian metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. (2020) 47:1514–21. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190733

  • 5

    HanlonPAvenellAAucottLVickersMA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the sero-epidemiological association between Epstein-Barr virus and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. (2014) 16:R3. doi: 10.1186/ar4429

  • 6

    MorottiASollakuICatalaniSFranceschiniFCavazzanaIFrediMet al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies on the association of occupational exposure to free crystalline silica and systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol (Oxford). (2021) 60:81–91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa444

  • 7

    WilliamsJNDrenkardCLimSS. The impact of social determinants of health on the presentation, management and outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol (Oxford). (2023) 62:i10–4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac613

  • 8

    PisetskyDS. Anti-DNA antibodies — quintessential biomarkers of SLE. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2016) 12:102–10. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.151

  • 9

    ArbuckleMRMcClainMTRubertoneMVScofieldRHDennisGJJamesJAet al. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. (2003) 349:1526–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021933

  • 10

    PisetskyDSLipskyPE. New insights into the role of antinuclear antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2020) 16:565–79. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0480-7

  • 11

    LouHLingGSCaoX. Autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: From immunopathology to therapeutic target. J Autoimmun. (2022) 132. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102861

  • 12

    SuurmondJDiamondB. Autoantibodies in systemic autoimmune diseases: specificity and pathogenicity. J Clin Invest. (2015) 125(6):2194–202. doi: 10.1172/JCI78084

  • 13

    EderLUrowitzMBGladmanDD. Damage in lupus patients–what have we learned so far? Lupus. (2013) 22:1225–31. doi: 10.1177/0961203313492872

  • 14

    BruceINO’KeeffeAGFarewellVHanlyJGManziSSuLet al. Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. In: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. (2015) 74(9):1706–13. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205171

  • 15

    CeccarelliFPerriconeCNatalucciFPicciarielloLOlivieriGCafaroGet al. Organ damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients: A multifactorial phenomenon. Autoimmun Rev. (2023) 22:103374. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103374

  • 16

    Amissah-ArthurMBGordonC. Contemporary treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: an update for clinicians. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. (2010) 1:163–75. doi: 10.1177/2040622310380100

  • 17

    FanouriakisAKostopoulouMAlunnoAAringerMBajemaIBoletisJNet al. update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. (2019) 78(6):736–45. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.3117

  • 18

    LeeSJSilvermanEBargmanJM. The role of antimalarial agents in the treatment of SLE and lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2011) 7:718–29. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.150

  • 19

    SchrezenmeierEDörnerT. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2020) 16:155–66. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x

  • 20

    Almeida-BrasilCCHanlyJGUrowitzMClarkeAERuiz-IrastorzaGGordonCet al. Flares after hydroxychloroquine reduction or discontinuation. In: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. (2022) 81(3):370–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221295

  • 21

    LevyRAGonzalez-RiveraTKhamashtaMFoxNLJones-LeoneARubinBet al. 10 Years of belimumab experience: What have we learnt? Lupus. (2021) 30:1705–21. doi: 10.1177/09612033211028653

  • 22

    Sans-PolaCDanésIBoschJÀMarrero-ÁlvarezPCortésJAgustíA. Off-label use of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with extrarenal disease activity: a retrospective study and literature review. Front Med. (2023) 10:1159794/full. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1159794/full

  • 23

    MackensenAMüllerFMougiakakosDBöltzSWilhelmAAignerMet al. Anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med. (2022) 28:2124–32. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02017-5

  • 24

    WangQXiaoZXZhengXWangGYangLShiLet al. In vivo CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. (2025) 393:1542–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2509522

  • 25

    PopaRLautaruLALucretiuRRuiuDCCarageaDOlteanuMet al. Therapy side effects in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Health Sci J. (2018) 44:316–21. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.44.03.18

  • 26

    Zonana-NacachABarrSGMagderLSPetriM. Damage in systemic lupus erythematosus and its association with corticosteroids. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2000) 43:1801–8. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200008)43:8<1801::AID-ANR16>3.0.CO;2-O

  • 27

    LiuPCLuoSLLvMNWangYLiJBYuSJet al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine blood concentration on the efficacy and ocular toxicity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:7674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58391-2

  • 28

    TianJLuoYWuHLongHZhaoMLuQ. Risk of adverse events from different drugs for SLE: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lupus Sci Med. (2018) 5:e000253. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2017-000253

  • 29

    GaynorBPuttermanCValadonPSpatzLScharffMDDiamondB. Peptide inhibition of glomerular deposition of an anti-DNA antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (1997) 94:1955–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1955

  • 30

    HuertaPTKowalCDeGiorgioLAVolpeBTDiamondB. Immunity and behavior: antibodies alter emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2006) 103:678–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510055103

  • 31

    DiamondBBloomOAl AbedYKowalCHuertaPTVolpeBT. Moving towards a cure: blocking pathogenic antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Intern Med. (2011) 269:36–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02318.x

  • 32

    PuttermanCDiamondB. Immunization with a peptide surrogate for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) induces autoantibody production and renal immunoglobulin deposition. J Exp Med. (1998) 188:29–38. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.1.29

  • 33

    BloomOChengKFHeMPapatheodorouAVolpeBTDiamondBet al. Generation of a unique small molecule peptidomimetic that neutralizes lupus autoantibody activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2011) 108:10255–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103555108

  • 34

    HeMChengKFVanPattenSBloomODiamondBAl-AbedY. A structural investigation of FISLE-412, a peptidomimetic compound derived from saquinavir that targets lupus autoantibodies. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. (2017) 27:4725–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.08.070

  • 35

    AltitiASChengKFHeMAl-AbedY. β-hydroxy-tetrahydroquinolines from quinolines using chloroborane: synthesis of the peptidomimetic FISLE-412. Chemistry. (2017) 23:10738–43. doi: 10.1002/chem.201701944

  • 36

    XiaYEryilmazEDerEPawarRDGuoXCowburnDet al. A peptide mimic blocks the cross-reaction of anti-DNA antibodies with glomerular antigens. Clin Exp Immunol. (2016) 183:369–79. doi: 10.1111/cei.12734

  • 37

    WangHLuMZhaiSWuKPengLYangJet al. ALW peptide ameliorates lupus nephritis in MRL/lpr mice. Arthritis Res Ther. (2019) 21:261. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2038-0

  • 38

    HoeppeSSchreiberTDPlanatscherHZellATemplinMFStollDet al. Targeting peptide termini, a novel immunoaffinity approach to reduce complexity in mass spectrometric protein identification. Mol Cell Proteomics. (2011) 10:S1–11. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.002857

  • 39

    CampbellIKKinkelSADrakeSFNieuwenhuijzeAHubertFXTarlintonDMet al. Autoimmune regulator controls T cell help for pathogenetic autoantibody production in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2009) 60:1683–93. doi: 10.1002/art.24501

  • 40

    LiuYLiuAIikuniNXuHShiFDCavaA. Regulatory CD4+ T cells promote B cell anergy in murine lupus. J Immunol. (2014) 192:4069–73. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302897

  • 41

    AschermannSLehmannCHMihaiSSchettGDudziakDNimmerjahnF. B cells are critical for autoimmune pathology in Scurfy mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2013) 110:19042–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313547110

  • 42

    GototJGottschalkCLeopoldSKnollePAYagitaHKurtsCet al. Regulatory T cells use programmed death 1 ligands to directly suppress autoreactive B cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2012) 109:10468–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201131109

  • 43

    AbdiramaDTeschSGrießbachASvon Spee-MayerCHumrichJYStervboUet al. Nuclear antigen-reactive CD4+ T cells expand in active systemic lupus erythematosus, produce effector cytokines, and invade the kidneys. Kidney Int. (2021) 99:238–46. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.05.051

  • 44

    LuLKaliyaperumalABoumpasDTDattaSK. Major peptide autoepitopes for nucleosome-specific T cells of human lupus. J Clin Invest. (1999) 104:345–55. doi: 10.1172/JCI6801

  • 45

    ParodisILongXKarlssonMCIHuangX. B cell tolerance and targeted therapies in SLE. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:6268. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196268

  • 46

    van VollenhovenRFKalunianKCDörnerTHahnBHTanakaYGordonRMet al. Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. (2022) 81:1556–63. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222858

  • 47

    ACCESS Trial Group. Treatment of lupus nephritis with abatacept: the Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2014) 66:3096–104. doi: 10.1002/art.38790

  • 48

    VukelicMLiYKyttarisVC. Novel treatments in lupus. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2658. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02658

  • 49

    LiWDengCYangHWangG. The regulatory T cell in active systemic lupus erythematosus patients: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00159

  • 50

    HorwitzDA. Regulatory T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: past, present and future. Arthritis Res Ther. (2008) 10. doi: 10.1186/ar2511

  • 51

    IikuniNLourençoEVHahnBHCavaA. Cutting edge: Regulatory T cells directly suppress B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. (2009) 183:1518–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901163

  • 52

    VenkatadriRSabapathyVDoganMSharmaR. Targeting regulatory T cells for therapy of lupus nephritis. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 12. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.806612

  • 53

    MizuiMTsokosGC. Targeting regulatory T cells to treat patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol. (2018) 9. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00786

  • 54

    La CavaA. T-regulatory cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. (2008) 17:421–5. doi: 10.1177/0961203308090028

  • 55

    ScalapinoKJTangQBluestoneJABonyhadiMLDaikhDI. Suppression of disease in New Zealand Black/New Zealand White lupus-prone mice by adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells. J Immunol. (2006) 177:1451–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1451

  • 56

    ScalapinoKJDaikhDI. Suppression of glomerulonephritis in NZB/NZW lupus prone mice by adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells. PloS One. (2009) 4:e6031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006031

  • 57

    WeigertOSpeeCUndeutschRKlokeLHumrichJYRiemekastenG. CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells prolong drug-induced disease remission in (NZBxNZW) F1 lupus mice. Arthritis Res Ther. (2013) 15:R35. doi: 10.1186/ar4188

  • 58

    DoglioMUgoliniABercher-BrayerCCamisaBTomaCNorataRet al. Regulatory T cells expressing CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor restore homeostasis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:2542. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46448-9

  • 59

    EggenhuizenPJCheongRMYLoCChangJNgBHTingYTet al. Smith-specific regulatory T cells halt the progression of lupus nephritis. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:899. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45056-x

  • 60

    La CavaA. Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Immunol Res. (2023) 4:150–6. doi: 10.2478/rir-2023-0021

  • 61

    AkkurMAAreeshiNAHaqawiIYAlHabjiAAAltaherAHJawkhabHAet al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review. Cureus. (2025) 17:e83323. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83323

  • 62

    ShouseANLaPorteKMMalekTR. Interleukin-2 signaling in the regulation of T cell biology in autoimmunity and cancer. Immunity. (2024) 57:414–28. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.02.001

  • 63

    SadlackBMerzHSchorleHSchimplAFellerACHorakI. Ulcerative colitis-like disease in mice with a disrupted interleukin-2 gene. Cell. (1993) 75:253–61. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80067-o

  • 64

    SuzukiHKündigTMFurlongerCWakehamATimmsEMatsuyamaTet al. Deregulated T cell activation and autoimmunity in mice lacking interleukin-2 receptor beta. Science. (1995) 268:1472–6. doi: 10.1126/science.7770771

  • 65

    HumrichJYMorbachHUndeutschREnghardPRosenbergerSWeigertOet al. Homeostatic imbalance of regulatory and effector T cells due to IL-2 deprivation amplifies murine lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:204–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903158107

  • 66

    RoseAvon Spee-MayerCKlokeLWuKKühlAEnghardPet al. IL-2 therapy diminishes renal inflammation and the activity of kidney-infiltrating CD4+ T cells in murine lupus nephritis. Cells. (2019) 8:1234. doi: 10.3390/cells8101234

  • 67

    Alcocer-VarelaJAlarcón-SegoviaD. Decreased production of and response to interleukin-2 by cultured lymphocytes from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest. (1982) 69:1388–92. doi: 10.1172/JCI110579

  • 68

    HeJZhangRShaoMZhaoXMiaoMChenJet al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose IL-2 in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. (2020) 79:141–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215396

  • 69

    HumrichJYCacoubPRosenzwajgMPitoisetFPhamHPGuidouxJet al. Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in active systemic lupus erythematosus (LUPIL-2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised and placebo-controlled phase II trial. Ann Rheum Dis. (2022) 81:1685–94. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222501

  • 70

    KaufmanMB. Mixed results for rezpegaldesleukin in patients with active SLE. Rheumatologist. (2023).

  • 71

    SedighiSAghaeiMMusaviSNomaliM. Relationship between serum level of interleukin-2 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and disease activity in comparison with control group. J Clin Diagn Res. (2014) 8:MC16–8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7903.4602

  • 72

    MattaBMLottJMMathewsLRLiuQRosboroughBRBlazarBRet al. IL-33 is an unconventional Alarmin that stimulates IL-2 secretion by dendritic cells to selectively expand IL-33R/ST2+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. (2014) 193:4010–20. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400481

  • 73

    Mohd JayaFNLiuZChanGC. Early treatment of interleukin-33 can attenuate lupus development in young NZB/W F1 mice. Cells. (2020) 9:2448. doi: 10.3390/cells9112448

  • 74

    LiPLinWZhengX. IL-33 neutralization suppresses lupus disease in lupus-prone mice. Inflammation. (2014) 37:824–32. doi: 10.1007/s10753-013-9802-0

  • 75

    ChunHYChungJWKimHAYunJMJeonJYYeYMet al. Cytokine IL-6 and IL-10 as biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Immunol. (2007) 27:461–6. doi: 10.1007/s10875-007-9104-0

  • 76

    ZhouLLopesJEChongMMIvanovIIMRVGDet al. TGF-beta-induced Foxp3 inhibits T(H)17 cell differentiation by antagonizing RORgammat function. Nature. (2008) 453:236–40. doi: 10.1038/nature06878

  • 77

    YouinouPJaminC. The weight of interleukin-6 in B cell-related autoimmune disorders. J Autoimmun. (2009) 32:206–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.02.013

  • 78

    TackeyELipskyPEIlleiGG. Rationale for interleukin-6 blockade in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. (2004) 13:339–43. doi: 10.1191/0961203304lu1023oa

  • 79

    RovinBHVollenhovenRFAranowCWagnerCGordonRZhuangYet al. Placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with sirukumab (CNTO 136) in patients with active lupus nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2016) 68:2174–83. doi: 10.1002/art.39722

  • 80

    WallaceDJStrandVMerrillJTPopaSSpindlerAJEimonAet al. Efficacy and safety of an interleukin 6 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a phase II dose-ranging randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. (2017) 76:534–42. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209668

  • 81

    ApostolidisSARodríguez-RodríguezNSuárez-FueyoADioufaNOzcanECrispínJCet al. Phosphatase PP2A is requisite for the function of regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. (2016) 17:556–64. doi: 10.1038/ni.3390

  • 82

    StraussLCzystowskaMSzajnikMMandapathilMWhitesideTL. Differential responses of human regulatory T cells (Treg) and effector T cells to rapamycin. PloS One. (2009) 4:e5994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005994

  • 83

    WarnerLMAdamsLMSehgalSN. Rapamycin prolongs survival and arrests pathophysiologic changes in murine systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. (1994) 37:289–97. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370219

  • 84

    FernandezDBonillaEMirzaNNilandBPerlA. Rapamycin reduces disease activity and normalizes T cell activation-induced calcium fluxing in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2006) 54:2983–8. doi: 10.1002/art.22085

  • 85

    LaiZWKellyRWinansTMarchenaIShadakshariAYuJet al. Sirolimus in patients with clinically active systemic lupus erythematosus resistant to, or intolerant of, conventional medications: a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet. (2018) 391:1186–96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30485-9

  • 86

    ErikssonPWallinPSjöwallC. Clinical experience of sirolimus regarding efficacy and safety in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Pharmacol. (2019) 10:82. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00082

  • 87

    KogaTMizuiMYoshidaNOtomoKLiebermanLACrispínJCet al. KN-93, an inhibitor of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV, promotes generation and function of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in MRL/lpr mice. Autoimmunity. (2014) 47:445–50. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2014.915954

  • 88

    OtomoKKogaTMizuiMYoshidaNKriegelCBickertonSet al. Cutting edge: nanogel-based delivery of an inhibitor of caMK4 to CD4+ T cells suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and lupus-like disease in mice. J Immunol. (2015) 195:5533–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501603

  • 89

    ZhangJChenCFuHYuJSunYHuangHet al. MicroRNA-125a-loaded polymeric nanoparticles alleviate systemic lupus erythematosus by restoring effector/regulatory T cells balance. ACS Nano. (2020) 14:4414–29. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09998

  • 90

    HahnBHSinghRRWongWKTsaoBPBulpittKEblingFM. Treatment with a consensus peptide based on amino acid sequences in autoantibodies prevents T cell activation by autoantigens and delays disease onset in murine lupus. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2001) 44:432–41. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200102)44:2<432::AID-ANR62>3.0.CO;2-S

  • 91

    WangYXiaoSXiaYWangH. The therapeutic strategies for SLE by targeting anti-dsDNA antibodies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2022) 63:152–65. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08898-7

  • 92

    YuYLiuYShiFDZouHHahnBHCavaA. Tolerance induced by anti-DNA Ig peptide in (NZB×NZW)F1 lupus mice impinges on the resistance of effector T cells to suppression by regulatory T cells. Clin Immunol. (2012) 142:291–5. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2011.11.004

  • 93

    HahnBHAndersonMLeECavaA. Anti-DNA Ig peptides promote Treg cell activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Arthritis Rheum. (2008) 58:2488–97. doi: 10.1002/art.23609

  • 94

    IikuniNHahnBHCavaA. Potential for anti-DNA immunoglobulin peptide therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Opin Biol Ther. (2009) 9:201–6. doi: 10.1517/14712590802681636

  • 95

    SthoegerZMDayanMTcherniackAGreenLToledoSSegalRet al. Modulation of autoreactive responses of peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus by peptides based on human and murine anti-DNA autoantibodies. Clin Exp Immunol. (2003) 131:385–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02058.x

  • 96

    SinghRPBischoffDSSinghSSHahnBH. Peptide-based immunotherapy in lupus: Where are we now? Rheumatol Immunol Res. (2023) 4:139–49. doi: 10.2478/rir-2023-0020

  • 97

    SharabiAZingerHZborowskyMSthoegerZMMozesE. A peptide based on the complementarity-determining region 1 of an autoantibody ameliorates lupus by up-regulating CD4+CD25+ cells and TGF-beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2006) 103:8810–5.

  • 98

    UrowitzMBIsenbergDAWallaceDJ. Safety and efficacy of hCDR1 (Edratide) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of phase II study. Lupus Sci Med. (2015) 2:e000104. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2015-000104

  • 99

    KangHKMichaelsMABernerBRDattaSK. Very low-dose tolerance with nucleosomal peptides controls lupus and induces potent regulatory T cell subsets. J Immunol. (2005) 174:3247–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.6.3247

  • 100

    ZhangLBertucciAMRamsey-GoldmanRBurtRKDattaSK. Regulatory T cell (Treg) subsets return in patients with refractory lupus following stem cell transplantation, and TGF-beta-producing CD8+ Treg cells are associated with immunological remission of lupus. J Immunol. (2009) 183:6346–58. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901773

  • 101

    ZhangLBertucciAMRamsey-GoldmanRHarsha-StrongERBurtRKDattaSK. Major pathogenic steps in human lupus can be effectively suppressed by nucleosomal histone peptide epitope-induced regulatory immunity. Clin Immunol. (2013) 149:365–78. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.08.008

  • 102

    WuHYWardFJStainesNA. Histone peptide-induced nasal tolerance: suppression of murine lupus. J Immunol. (2002) 169:1126–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.2.1126

  • 103

    WuHYStainesNA. A deficiency of CD4+CD25+ T cells permits the development of spontaneous lupus-like disease in mice, and can be reversed by induction of mucosal tolerance to histone peptide autoantigen. Lupus. (2004) 13:192–200. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu1002oa

  • 104

    ShapiraEProscuraEBrodskyBWormserU. Novel peptides as potential treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. (2011) 20:463–72. doi: 10.1177/0961203310389484

  • 105

    MiyaraMAmouraZParizotCBadoualCDorghamKTradSet al. Global natural regulatory T cell depletion in active systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. (2005) 175:8392–400. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8392

  • 106

    BarathSAlekszaMTarrTSipkaSSzegediGKissE. Measurement of natural (CD4+CD25high) and inducible (CD4+IL-10+) regulatory T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. (2007) 16:489–96. doi: 10.1177/0961203307080226

  • 107

    LuLYChuJJLuPJSungPKHsuCMTsengJC. Expression of intracellular transforming growth factor-beta1 in CD4+CD25+ cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. (2008) 41:165–73.

  • 108

    BonelliMSavitskayaADalwigkKSteinerCWAletahaDSmolenJSet al. Quantitative and qualitative deficiencies of regulatory T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Int Immunol. (2008) 20:861–8. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn044

  • 109

    YangJChuYYangXGaoDZhuLYangXet al. Th17 and natural Treg cell population dynamics in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2009) 60:1472–83. doi: 10.1002/art.24499

  • 110

    SuenJLLiHTJongYJChiangBLYenJH. Altered homeostasis of CD4(+) FoxP3(+) regulatory T-cell subpopulations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunology. (2009) 127:196–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02937.x

  • 111

    TseliosKSarantopoulosAGkougkourelasIBouraP. CD4+CD25highFOXP3+ T regulatory cells as a biomarker of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2014) 32(5):630–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1407

  • 112

    ŻabińskaMKrajewskaMKościelska-KasprzakKJakuszkoKBartoszekDMyszkaMet al. CD4(+)CD25(+)CD127(-) and CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cell subsets in mediating autoimmune reactivity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). (2016) 64:399–407. doi: 10.1007/s00005-016-0399-5

  • 113

    HenriquesAInêsLCoutoMPedreiroSSantosCMagalhãesMet al. Frequency and functional activity of Th17, Tc17 and other T-cell subsets in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Cell Immunol. (2010) 264:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.05.004

  • 114

    VenigallaRKTretterTKrienkeSMaxREcksteinVBlankNet al. Reduced CD4+,CD25- T cell sensitivity to the suppressive function of CD4+,CD25high,CD127 -/low regulatory T cells in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2008) 58:2120–30. doi: 10.1002/art.23556

  • 115

    YanBYeSChenGKuangMShenNChenS. Dysfunctional CD4+,CD25+ regulatory T cells in untreated active systemic lupus erythematosus secondary to interferon-alpha-producing antigen-presenting cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2008) 801-12:58(3). doi: 10.1002/art.23268

  • 116

    HandonoKFirdausiSNPratamaMZEndhartiATKalimH. Vitamin A improve Th17 and Treg regulation in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. (2016) 35:631–8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3197-x

  • 117

    MesquitaDJrKirsztajnGMFrancoMFReisLAPerazzioSFMesquitaFVet al. CD4+ T helper cells and regulatory T cells in active lupus nephritis: an imbalance towards a predominant Th1 response? Clin Exp Immunol. (2018) 191:50–9. doi: 10.1111/cei.13050

  • 118

    JanewayCAJrTraversPWalportMShlomchikM. Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease, 5th ed. (2001) New York: Garland Science.

  • 119

    ShlomchikMJ. Sites and stages of autoreactive B cell activation and regulation. Immunity. (2008) 28:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.004

  • 120

    MelchersF. Checkpoints that control B cell development. J Clin Invest. (2015) 125:2203–10. doi: 10.1172/JCI78083

  • 121

    WardemannHNussenzweigMC. B-cell self-tolerance in humans. Adv Immunol. (2007) 95:83–110. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(07)95003-8

  • 122

    GoodnowCCAdelsteinSBastenA. The need for central and peripheral tolerance in the B cell repertoire. Science. (1990) 248:1373–9. doi: 10.1126/science.2356469

  • 123

    JacobiAMDiamondB. Balancing diversity and tolerance: lessons from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med. (2005) 202:341–4. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050221

  • 124

    PillaiSMattooHCariappaA. B cells and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. (2011) 23:721–31. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.10.007

  • 125

    DeguineJXavierRJ. B cell tolerance and autoimmunity: Lessons from repertoires. J Exp Med. (2024) 221:e20231314. doi: 10.1084/jem.20231314

  • 126

    WardemannHYurasovSSchaeferAYoungJWMeffreENussenzweigMC. Predominant autoantibody production by early human B cell precursors. Science. (2003) 301:1374–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1086907

  • 127

    NemazeeD. Mechanisms of central tolerance for B cells. Nat Rev Immunol. (2017) 17:281–94. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.19

  • 128

    TiegsSLRussellDMNemazeeD. Receptor editing in self-reactive bone marrow B cells. J Exp Med. (1993) 177:1009–20. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.4.1009

  • 129

    GayDSaundersTCamperSWeigertM. Receptor editing: an approach by autoreactive B cells to escape tolerance. J Exp Med. (1993) 177:999–1008. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.4.999

  • 130

    GetahunA. Role of inhibitory signaling in peripheral B cell tolerance. Immunol Rev. (2022) 307:27–42. doi: 10.1111/imr.13070

  • 131

    SongHCernyJ. Functional heterogeneity of marginal zone B cells revealed by their ability to generate both early antibody-forming cells and germinal centers with hypermutation and memory in response to a T-dependent antigen. J Exp Med. (2003) 198:1923–35. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031498

  • 132

    WilliamJEulerCChristensenSShlomchikMJ. Evolution of autoantibody responses via somatic hypermutation outside of germinal centers. Science. (2002) 297(5589):2066–70. doi: 10.1126/science.1073924

  • 133

    RaySKPuttermanCDiamondB. Pathogenic autoantibodies are routinely generated during the response to foreign antigen: a paradigm for autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (1996) 93:2019–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.2019

  • 134

    van EsJHGmelig MeylingFHvan de AkkerWRAanstootHDerksenRHLogtenbergT. Somatic mutations in the variable regions of a human IgG anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibody suggest a role for antigen in the induction of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Exp Med. (1991) 173:461–70. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.2.461

  • 135

    WinklerTHFehrHKaldenJR. Analysis of immunoglobulin variable region genes from human IgG anti-DNA hybridomas. Eur J Immunol. (1992) 22:1719–28. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220709

  • 136

    WellmannULetzMHerrmannMAngermüllerSKaldenJRWTH. The evolution of human anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2005) 102:9258–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500132102

  • 137

    MietznerBTsuijiMScheidJVelinzonKTillerTAbrahamKet al. Autoreactive IgG memory antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus arise from nonreactive and polyreactive precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2008) 105:9727–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803644105

  • 138

    GuoWSmithDAviszusKDetanicoTHeiserRAWysockiLJ. Somatic hypermutation as a generator of antinuclear antibodies in a murine model of systemic autoimmunity. J Exp Med. (2010) 207:2225–37. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092712

  • 139

    ShlomchikMJMarshak-RothsteinAWolfowiczCBRothsteinTLWeigertMG. The role of clonal selection and somatic mutation in autoimmunity. Nature. (1987) 328:805–11. doi: 10.1038/328805a0

  • 140

    JenksSACashmanKSWoodruffMCLeeFESanzI. Extrafollicular responses in humans and SLE. Immunol Rev. (2019) 288:136–48. doi: 10.1111/imr.12741

  • 141

    BeckersLSomersVFraussenJ. IgD-CD27- double negative (DN) B cells: Origins and functions in health and disease. Immunol Lett. (2023) 255:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2023.03.003

  • 142

    ChungMKYGongLKwongDLLeeVHLeeAWGuanXYet al. Functions of double-negative B cells in autoimmune diseases, infections, and cancers. EMBO Mol Med. (2023) 15:e17341. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202217341

  • 143

    StewartANgJCWallisGTsioligkaVFraternaliFDunn-WaltersDK. Single-cell transcriptomic analyses define distinct peripheral B cell subsets and discrete development pathways. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:602539. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.602539

  • 144

    FillatreauSManfroiBDörnerT. Toll-like receptor signalling in B cells during systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2021) 17:98–108. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00544-4

  • 145

    JenksSACashmanKSZumaqueroEMarigortaUMPatelAVWangXet al. Distinct effector B cells induced by unregulated toll-like receptor 7 contribute to pathogenic responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity. (2018) 49:725–739.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.015

  • 146

    CancroMP. Age-associated B cells. Annu Rev Immunol. (2020) 38:315–40. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-092419-031130

  • 147

    ChizzoliniCGueryJCNouletFGruazLCenacCFrascaLet al. Extrafollicular CD19lowCXCR5-CD11c- double negative 3 (DN3) B cells are significantly associated with disease activity in females with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Transl Autoimmun. (2024) 9:100252. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2024.100252

  • 148

    LamJHBaumgarthN. Toll-like receptor mediated inflammation directs B cells towards protective antiviral extrafollicular responses. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:3979. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39734-5

  • 149

    ZhuDYCastrillonCCarrollMC. Innate immune receptors as dynamic modulators of extrafollicular autoimmune B cell response. Immunol Rev. (2025) 330:e70005. doi: 10.1111/imr.70005

  • 150

    AmbegaonkarAANagataSPierceSKSohnH. The differentiation in vitro of human tonsil B cells with the phenotypic and functional characteristics of T-bet+ Atypical memory B cells in malaria. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:852. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00852

  • 151

    HollaPDizonBAmbegaonkarAARogelNGoldschmidtEBoddapatiAKet al. Shared transcriptional profiles of atypical B cells suggest common drivers of expansion and function in malaria, HIV, and autoimmunity. Sci Adv. (2021) 7:eabg8384. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg8384

  • 152

    NikolovaKAMihaylovaNMVoynovaENTchorbanovAIVollREVassilevTL. Selective silencing of autoreactive B lymphocytes—Following the Nature’s way. Autoimmun Rev. (2010) 9:775–9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.06.010

  • 153

    RethMKelsoeGRajewskyK. Idiotypic regulation by isologous monoclonal anti-idiotope antibodies. Nature. (1981) 290:257–9. doi: 10.1038/290257a0

  • 154

    LebrunPBurnyWCosynsJPSaint-RemyJM. Injections of complexes made of dsDNA and specific polyclonal antibodies extend MRL lpr mouse survival: a pilot study. Lupus. (1994) 3:47–53. doi: 10.1177/096120339400300110

  • 155

    BurnyWLebrunPCosynsJPSaint-RemyJM. Treatment with dsDNA-anti-dsDNA antibody complexes extends survival, decreases anti-dsDNA antibody production and reduces severity of nephritis in MRLlpr mice. Lupus. (1997) 6:4–17. doi: 10.1177/096120339700600102

  • 156

    CelisEChangTW. Antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen potentiate the response of human T lymphocyte clones to the same antigen. Science. (1984) 224:297–9. doi: 10.1126/science.6231724

  • 157

    HorowitzDMFurieRA. Abetimus sodium: a medication for the prevention of lupus nephritis flares. Expert Opin Pharmacother. (2009) 10:1501–7. doi: 10.1517/14656560902946419

  • 158

    MoscaMBaldiniCBombardieriS. LJP-394 (abetimus sodium) in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Opin Pharmacother. (2007) 8:873–9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.8.6.873

  • 159

    FurieR. Abetimus sodium (riquent) for the prevention of nephritic flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. (2006) 32:149–56, x. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2005.11.001

  • 160

    CardielMHTumlinJAFurieRAWallaceDJJohTLinnikMD. LJP 394-90–09 Investigator Consortium. Abetimus sodium for renal flare in systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a randomized, controlled phase III trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2008) 58:2470–80. doi: 10.1002/art.23673

  • 161

    RavetchJVLanierLL. Immune inhibitory receptors. Science. (2000) 290:84–9. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5489.84

  • 162

    BorossPArandharaVLMartin-RamirezJSantiago-RaberMLCarlucciFFliermanRet al. The inhibiting Fc receptor for IgG, FcγRIIB, is a modifier of autoimmune susceptibility. J Immunol. (2011) 187:1304–13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101194

  • 163

    RahmanZSNiuHPerryDWakelandEManserTMorelL. Expression of the autoimmune Fcgr2b NZW allele fails to be upregulated in germinal center B cells and is associated with increased IgG production. Genes Immun. (2007) 8:604–12. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364423

  • 164

    YuasaTKuboSYoshinoTUjikeAMatsumuraKOnoMet al. Deletion of fcgamma receptor IIB renders H-2(b) mice susceptible to collagen-induced arthritis. J Exp Med. (1999) 189:187–94. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.1.187

  • 165

    NakamuraAYuasaTUjikeAOnoMNukiwaTRavetchJVet al. Fcgamma receptor IIB-deficient mice develop Goodpasture's syndrome upon immunization with type IV collagen: a novel murine model for autoimmune glomerular basement membrane disease. J Exp Med. (2000) 191:899–906. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.5.899

  • 166

    BollandSRavetchJV. Spontaneous autoimmune disease in Fc(gamma)RIIB-deficient mice results from strain-specific epistasis. Immunity. (2000) 13:277–85. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00027-3

  • 167

    EspéliMClatworthyMRBökersSLawlorKECutlerAJKöntgenFet al. Analysis of a wild mouse promoter variant reveals a novel role for FcγRIIb in the control of the germinal center and autoimmunity. J Exp Med. (2012) 209:2307–19. doi: 10.1084/jem.20121752

  • 168

    FukuyamaHNimmerjahnFRavetchJV. The inhibitory Fcγ receptor modulates autoimmunity by limiting the accumulation of immunoglobulin G+ anti-DNA plasma cells. Nat Immunol. (2005) 6:99–106. doi: 10.1038/ni1151

  • 169

    JhouJPYuISHwaiHChenCSChenPLTzengSJ. The lupus-associated fcγ Receptor IIb-I232T polymorphism results in impairment in the negative selection of low-affinity germinal center B cells via c-abl in mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2018) 70:1866–78. doi: 10.1002/art.40555

  • 170

    JiangYHiroseSSanokawa-AkakuraRAbeMMiXLiNet al. Genetically determined aberrant down-regulation of FcgammaRIIB1 in germinal center B cells associated with hyper-IgG and IgG autoantibodies in murine systemic lupus erythematosus. Int Immunol. (1999) 11:1685–91. doi: 10.1093/intimm/11.10.1685

  • 171

    TillerTKoferJKreschelCBusseCERiebelSWickertSet al. Development of self-reactive germinal center B cells and plasma cells in autoimmune Fc gammaRIIB-deficient mice. J Exp Med. (2010) 207:2767–78. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100171

  • 172

    BarlevANMalkielSKurata-SatoIDorjéeALSuurmondJDiamondB. FcγRIIB regulates autoantibody responses by limiting marginal zone B cell activation. J Clin Invest. (2022) 132:e157250. doi: 10.1172/JCI157250

  • 173

    McGahaTLSorrentinoBRavetchJV. Restoration of tolerance in lupus by targeted inhibitory receptor expression. Science. (2005) 307:590–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1105160

  • 174

    BrownlieRJLawlorKENiedererHACutlerAJXiangZClatworthyMRet al. Distinct cell-specific control of autoimmunity and infection by FcgammaRIIb. J Exp Med. (2008) 205:883–95. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072565

  • 175

    TchorbanovAIVoynovaENMihaylovaNMTodorovTANikolovaMYomtovaVMet al. Selective silencing of DNA-specific B lymphocytes delays lupus activity in MRL/lpr mice. Eur J Immunol. (2007) 37:3587–96. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737143

  • 176

    KaliyaperumalAMichaelsMADattaSK. Naturally processed chromatin peptides reveal a major autoepitope that primes pathogenic T and B cells of lupus. J Immunol. (2002) 168:2530–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.5.2530

  • 177

    MihaylovaNVoynovaETchorbanovANikolovaMMichovaATodorovTet al. Selective silencing of disease-associated B-lymphocytes by chimeric molecules targeting their FcγIIb receptor. Int Immunol. (2008) 20:165–75. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxm133

  • 178

    Nikolova-GanevaKAGeshevaVVTodorovTAVollREVassilevTL. Targeted silencing of DNA-specific B cells combined with partial plasma cell depletion displays additive effects on delaying disease onset in lupus-prone mice. Clin Exp Immunol. (2013) 174:221–8. doi: 10.1111/cei.12164

  • 179

    VoynovaETchorbanovAPrechlJNikolovaMBalevaMErdeiAet al. An antibody-based construct carrying DNA-mimotope and targeting CR1(CD35) selectively suppresses human autoreactive B-lymphocytes. Immunol Lett. (2008) 116:168–73. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.12.016

  • 180

    OuPStanekAHuanZRomanCAJHuanC. SMS2 deficiency impairs PKCδ-regulated B cell tolerance in the germinal center. Cell Rep. (2021) 36:109624. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109624

  • 181

    HuitemaKvan den DikkenbergJBrouwersJFHMHolthuisJCM. Identification of a family of animal sphingomyelin synthases. EMBO J. (2004) 23:33–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600034

  • 182

    MecklenbräukerIKalledSLLeitgesMMackayFTarakhovskyA. Regulation of B-cell survival by BAFF-dependent PKCdelta-mediated nuclear signalling. Nature. (2004) 431:456–61. doi: 10.1038/nature02955

  • 183

    MoriyaSKazlauskasAAkimotoKHiraiSMizunoKTakenawaTet al. Platelet-derived growth factor activates protein kinase C epsilon through redundant and independent signaling pathways involving phospholipase C gamma or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1996) 93:151–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.151

  • 184

    MartiniSPozziGCarubbiCMasselliEGalliDDi NuzzoSet al. PKCϵ promotes human Th17 differentiation: Implications in the pathophysiology of psoriasis. Eur J Immunol. (2018) 48:644–54. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747102

  • 185

    LimnanderADepeillePFreedmanTSLiouJLeitgesMKurosakiTet al. STIM1, PKC-δ and RasGRP set a threshold for proapoptotic Erk signaling during B cell development. Nat Immunol. (2011) 12:425–33. doi: 10.1038/ni.2016

  • 186

    LimnanderAZikhermanJLauTLeitgesMWeissARooseJP. Protein kinase Cδ promotes transitional B cell-negative selection and limits proximal B cell receptor signaling to enforce tolerance. Mol Cell Biol. (2014) 34:1474–85. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01699-13

  • 187

    BelotAKasherPRTrotterEWForayAPDebaudALRiceGIet al. Protein kinase Cδ Deficiency causes mendelian systemic lupus erythematosus with B cell–defective apoptosis and hyperproliferation. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2013) 65:2161–71. doi: 10.1002/art.38008

  • 188

    KuehnHSNiemelaJERangel-SantosAZhangMPittalugaSStoddardJLet al. Loss-of-function of the protein kinase C δ (PKCδ) causes a B-cell lymphoproliferative syndrome in humans. Blood. (2013) 121:3117–25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-469544

  • 189

    SalzerESantos-ValenteEKlaverSBanSAEmmingerWPrengemannNKet al. B-cell deficiency and severe autoimmunity caused by deficiency of protein kinase C δ. Blood. (2013) 121:3112–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-460741

  • 190

    ChavanSVDesikanSRomanCAJHuanC. PKCδ Protects against lupus autoimmunity. Biomedicines. (2024) 12:1364. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061364

  • 191

    HelyerBJHowieJB. Renal disease associated with positive lupus erythematosus tests in a crossbred strain of mice. Nature. (1963) 197:197–7. doi: 10.1038/197197a0

  • 192

    KöberlinMSSnijderBHeinzLXBaumannCLFausterAVladimerGIet al. A conserved circular network of coregulated lipids modulates innate immune responses. Cell. (2015) 162:170–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.051

  • 193

    JacksonSWScharpingNEKolhatkarNSKhimSSchwartzMALiQZet al. Opposing impact of B cell intrinsic TLR7 and TLR9 signals on autoantibody repertoire and systemic inflammation. J Immunol. (2014) 192:4525–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400098

  • 194

    TilstraJSJohnSGordonRALeiblerCKashgarianMBastackySet al. B cell-intrinsic TLR9 expression is protective in murine lupus. J Clin Invest. (2020) 130:3172–87. doi: 10.1172/JCI132328

  • 195

    CosgroveHAGingrasSKimMBastackySTilstraJSShlomchikMJ. B cell-intrinsic TLR7 expression drives severe lupus in TLR9-deficient mice. JCI Insight. (2023) 8:e172219. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.172219

  • 196

    BrownGJCañetePFWangHMedhavyABonesJRocoJAet al. TLR7 gain-of-function genetic variation causes human lupus. Nature. (2022) 605:349–56. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04642-z

  • 197

    MöckelTBastaFWeinmann-MenkeJSchwartingA. B cell activating factor (BAFF): Structure, functions, autoimmunity and clinical implications in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Autoimmun Rev. (2021) 20:102736. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102736

  • 198

    ZhangJRoschkeVBakerKPWangZAlarcónGSFesslerBJet al. Cutting edge: a role for B lymphocyte stimulator in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. (2001) 166:6–10. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.6

  • 199

    DavidsonA. The rationale for BAFF inhibition in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Rheumatol Rep. (2012) 14:295–302. doi: 10.1007/s11926-012-0258-2

  • 200

    MackayFWoodcockSALawtonPAmbroseCBaetscherMSchneiderPet al. Mice transgenic for BAFF develop lymphocytic disorders along with autoimmune manifestations. J Exp Med. (1999) 190:1697–710. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.11.1697

  • 201

    KaurSParmarSSmithJKatsoulidisELiYSassanoAet al. Role of protein kinase C-delta (PKC-delta) in the generation of the effects of IFN-alpha in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Exp Hematol. (2005) 33:550–7. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.01.014

  • 202

    UddinSSassanoADebDKVermaAMajchrzakBRahmanAet al. Protein kinase C-delta (PKC-delta ) is activated by type I interferons and mediates phosphorylation of Stat1 on serine 727. J Biol Chem. (2002) 277:14408–16. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109671200

  • 203

    DebDKSassanoALekmineFMajchrzakBVermaAKambhampatiSet al. Activation of protein kinase C delta by IFN-gamma. J Immunol. (2003) 171:267–73. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.1.267

  • 204

    Scheel-ToellnerDPillingDAkbarANHardieDLombardiGSalmonMet al. Inhibition of T cell apoptosis by IFN-beta rapidly reverses nuclear translocation of protein kinase C-delta. Eur J Immunol. (1999) 29:2603–12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199908)29:08<2603::AID-IMMU2603>3.0.CO;2-L

  • 205

    XiePStunzLLLarisonKDYangBBishopGA. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 is a critical regulator of B cell homeostasis in secondary lymphoid organs. Immunity. (2007) 27:253–67. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.07.012

  • 206

    LopezJLai-KwonJMolifeRWelshLTunariuNRodaDet al. A Phase 1/2A trial of idroxioleic acid: first-in-class sphingolipid regulator and glioma cell autophagy inducer with antitumor activity in refractory glioma. Br J Cancer. (2023) 129:811–8. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02356-1

  • 207

    Barceló-CoblijnGMartinMLde AlmeidaRFMNoguera-SalvàMAMarcilla-EtxenikeAGuardiola-SerranoFet al. Sphingomyelin and sphingomyelin synthase (SMS) in the Malignant transformation of glioma cells and in 2-hydroxyoleic acid therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2011) 108:19569–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115484108

  • 208

    TerésSLladóVHigueraMBarceló-CoblijnGMartinMLNoguera-SalvàMAet al. 2-Hydroxyoleate, a nontoxic membrane binding anticancer drug, induces glioma cell differentiation and autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2012) 109:8489–94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118349109

  • 209

    MartinMLLiebischGLehneisSSchmitzGAlonso-SandeMBestard-EscalasJet al. Sustained activation of sphingomyelin synthase by 2-hydroxyoleic acid induces sphingolipidosis in tumor cells. J Lipid Res. (2013) 54:1457–65. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M036749

  • 210

    SessaLNardielloAMSantoroJConcilioSPiottoS. Hydroxylated fatty acids: the role of the sphingomyelin synthase and the origin of selectivity. Membranes (Basel). (2021) 11:787. doi: 10.3390/membranes11100787

  • 211

    LouBLiuQHouJKabirILiuPDingTet al. 2-Hydroxy-oleic acid does not activate sphingomyelin synthase activity. J Biol Chem. (2018) 293:18328–36. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005904

  • 212

    MurakamiCDilimulatiKAtsuta-TsunodaKKawaiTInomataSHijikataYet al. Multiple activities of sphingomyelin synthase 2 generate saturated fatty acid- and/or monounsaturated fatty acid-containing diacylglycerol. J Biol Chem. (2024) 300:107960. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107960

  • 213

    ChiangYPLiZChenYCaoYJiangXC. Sphingomyelin synthases 1 and 2 exhibit phosphatidylcholine phospholipase C activity. J Biol Chem. (2021) 297:101398. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101398

  • 214

    SuzukiRMurakamiCDilimulatiKAtsuta-TsunodaKKawaiTSakaneF. Human sphingomyelin synthase 1 generates diacylglycerol in the presence and absence of ceramide via multiple enzymatic activities. FEBS Lett. (2023) 597:2672–86. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14735

  • 215

    Marín-RosalesMCruzASalazar-CamarenaDCSantillán-LópezEEspinoza-GarcíaNMuñoz-ValleJF. High BAFF expression associated with active disease in systemic lupus erythematosus and relationship with rs9514828C<T polymorphism in TNFSF13B gene. Clin Exp Med. (2019) 19:183–90. doi: 10.1007/s10238-019-00549-8

  • 216

    PetriMStohlWChathamWMcCuneWJChevrierMRyelJ. Association of plasma B lymphocyte stimulator levels and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatism. (2008) 58:2453–9. doi: 10.1002/art.23678

  • 217

    McCarthyEMLeeRZNí GabhannJSmithSCunnaneGDoranMF. Elevated B lymphocyte stimulator levels are associated with increased damage in an Irish systemic lupus erythematosus cohort. Rheumatology. (2013) 52:1279–84. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket120

  • 218

    FurieRAWallaceDJAranowC. Long-term safety and efficacy of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A continuation of a seventy-six-week phase III parent study in the United States. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2018) 70(6):868–77. doi: 10.1002/art.40439

  • 219

    FurieRRovinBHHoussiauF. Safety and efficacy of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis: open-label extension of BLISS-LN study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2022) 17:1620–30. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02520322

  • 220

    WallaceDJGinzlerEMMerrillJTFurieRAStohlWChathamWWet al. Safety and efficacy of belimumab plus standard therapy for up to thirteen years in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2019) 71(7):1125–34. doi: 10.1002/art.40861

  • 221

    Vilas-BoasAMoraisSAIsenbergDA. Belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus. RMD Open. (2015) 1:000011. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000011

  • 222

    FurieRRovinBRHoussiauF. Controlled trial of belimumab in lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:1117–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001180

  • 223

    GinzlerEMWallaceDJMerrillJTFurieRAStohlWChathamWWet al. Disease control and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy over 7 years in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. (2014) 41:300–9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121368

  • 224

    LiuZDavidsonA. BAFF and selection of autoreactive B cells. Trends Immunol. (2011) 32:388–94. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.06.004

  • 225

    ThienMPhanTGGardamSAmesburyMBastenAMackayFet al. Excess BAFF rescues self-reactive B cells from peripheral deletion and allows them to enter forbidden follicular and marginal zone niches. Immunity. (2004) 20:785–98. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.05.010

  • 226

    StadanlickJECancroMP. BAFF and the plasticity of peripheral B cell tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol. (2008) 20:158–61. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.03.015

  • 227

    CoqueryCMLooWMWadeNSBedermanAGTungKSLewisJEet al. BAFF regulates follicular helper t cells and affects their accumulation and interferon-γ production in autoimmunity. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2015) 67:773–84. doi: 10.1002/art.38950

  • 228

    ChenYChenMLiuYLiQXueYLiuLet al. BAFF promotes follicular helper T cell development and germinal center formation through BR3 signal. JCI Insight. (2024) 9:e183400. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.183400

  • 229

    RahmanZSRaoSPKalledSLManserT. Normal induction but attenuated progression of germinal center responses in BAFF and BAFF-R signaling-deficient mice. J Exp Med. (2003) 198:1157–69. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030495

  • 230

    HuangWQuachTDDascaluCLiuZLeungTByrne-SteeleMet al. Belimumab promotes negative selection of activated autoreactive B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. JCI Insight. (2018) 3:e122525. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.122525

  • 231

    KayagakiNYanMSeshasayeeDWangHLeeWFrenchDMet al. BAFF/BLyS receptor 3 binds the B cell survival factor BAFF ligand through a discrete surface loop and promotes processing of NF-kappaB2. Immunity. (2002) 17:515–24. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00425-9

  • 232

    OkumaKOkuTSasakiCKitagoriKMimoriTAramoriIet al. Similarity and difference between systemic lupus erythematosus and NZB/W F1 mice by multi-omics analysis. Mod Rheumatol. (2024) 34:359–68. doi: 10.1093/mr/road024

  • 233

    GrossJAJohnstonJMudriSEnselmanRDillonSRMKet al. TACI and BCMA are receptors for a TNF homologue implicated in B-cell autoimmune disease. Nature. (2000) 404:995–9. doi: 10.1038/35010115

  • 234

    RamanujamMWangXHuangWLiuZSchifferLTaoHet al. Similarities and differences between selective and nonselective BAFF blockade in murine SLE. J Clin Invest. (2006) 116:724–34. doi: 10.1172/JCI26385

  • 235

    BoneparthAWoodsMHuangWAkermanMLesserMDavidsonA. The effect of BAFF inhibition on autoreactive B-cell selection in murine systemic lupus erythematosus. Mol Med. (2016) 22:173–82. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2016.00022

  • 236

    JacksonSWDavidsonA. BAFF inhibition in SLE-Is tolerance restored? Immunol Rev. (2019) 292:102–19. doi: 10.1111/imr.12810

Summary

Keywords

autoreactive B cells, B cell tolerance, germinal center, lupus treatment, SLE, SMS2/PKCδ tolerance pathway

Citation

Shai SD, Chavan SV, Huan EZ, Kalin PM, Feuerman M, Roman CAJ and Huan C (2026) Restoring B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity: a rational strategy for lupus treatment. Front. Immunol. 17:1728403. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1728403

Received

19 October 2025

Revised

12 January 2026

Accepted

14 January 2026

Published

11 February 2026

Volume

17 - 2026

Edited by

Michael A. Firer, Ariel University, Israel

Reviewed by

Yongwei Zheng, Guangzhou Bio-Gene Technology Co., Ltd., China

Athanasios Sachinidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Updates

Copyright

© 2026 Shai, Chavan, Huan, Kalin, Feuerman, Roman and Huan.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Christopher A. J. Roman, ; Chongmin Huan,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics