Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 06 February 2026

Sec. Nutritional Immunology

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1729647

Association between the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index and cardiovascular incidence and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective study

Chen Jiang,&#x;Chen Jiang1,2†Qi Zhou&#x;Qi Zhou3†Jian Feng&#x;Jian Feng1†Shuo Liu&#x;Shuo Liu4†Miaomiao Fan,Miaomiao Fan1,2Hao Bai,,Hao Bai1,3,5Shujuan LinShujuan Lin6Liyong Chen,,*Liyong Chen1,2,7*
  • 1Department of Nutrition, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • 2Department of Health, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
  • 4Department of Geriatric Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
  • 5Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
  • 6School of Basic Medicine Science, Key Laboratory of Translational Tumor Medicine in Fujian Province, Putian University, Putian, China
  • 7Department of Toxicology and Nutrition, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China

Background and aim: The recently developed C-reactive protein-to-albumin-to-lymphocyte (CALLY) index represents a novel composite biomarker that simultaneously reflects inflammatory status, immune competence, and nutritional adequacy. However, to date, there are limited evidence on whether CALLY index affects the cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the associations between the CALLY index and CVD incidence, all-cause and CVD-specific mortality in CKD patients from UK Biobank.

Methods: The CALLY index was calculated based on lymphocyte counts, serum albumin concentrations, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. The association between CALLY index and diverse CVD events were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis.

Results: A total of 22,898 CKD patients were included. Compared to participants with lowest quartile of CALLY, those with highest quartile had decreased risk of incident overall CVD (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.65-0.75), IHD (HR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.63-0.78), MI (HR: 0.69, 95%CI: 0.57-0.83), stroke (HR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.62-0.88), and all-cause (HR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.51-0.61) and CVD-specific mortality (HR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.44-0.66). RCS analysis showed the significant L-shaped dose-response relationships between CALLY index and CVD incidence and mortality outcomes, indicating a saturation effect.

Conclusion: The moderate-to-high CALLY index was significantly associated with a reduced risk of CVD events-including IHD, MI, and stroke, as well as lower all-cause and CVD-specific mortality. These findings suggest that the CALLY index, which integrates inflammatory, nutritional, and immunological markers, may serve as a potential biomarker for risk stratification in patients with CKD. Future longitudinal studies incorporating repeated assessments would be valuable to better characterize the temporal trajectory of the CALLY index and its association with cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with CKD, thereby improving causal inference.

1 Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), characterized by persistent structural or functional renal impairment with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (1), has emerged as a global health crisis affecting approximately 850 million individuals worldwide (2). CKD currently ranks among the fastest-growing causes of mortality globally, with projections indicating it will become the fifth leading contributor to years of life lost by 2040 (3). Of particular clinical significance, CKD has been firmly established as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) - the predominant driver of both morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable patient population (4).

The pathophysiology of CVD in CKD patients involves a complex interplay of inflammation, nutritional deficiencies, and immune dysregulation (5, 6). Emerging evidence suggests that anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory strategies may offer cardiovascular benefits (7), while dietary modifications and lifestyle interventions have demonstrated efficacy in CVD prevention (8). Consequently, integrated evaluation of nutritional, inflammatory, and immunological parameters may provide valuable insights for reducing CVD risk in CKD patients. Clinical studies have identified serum albumin as an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (9), while C-reactive protein (CRP) has been widely validated as a robust biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment. Furthermore, growing evidence implicates immune mechanisms in CVD pathogenesis, with lymphocyte counts emerging as significant prognostic indicators (10). Therefore, an indicator capable of integrating and reflecting these interconnected pathological processes may provide a more precise assessment of cardiovascular risk in CKD patients than any single parameter. The recently developed C-reactive protein-to-albumin-to-lymphocyte (CALLY) index represents a novel composite biomarker that simultaneously reflects inflammatory status (CRP), immune competence (lymphocytes), and nutritional adequacy (albumin) (11). Its design is grounded in robust pathophysiological rationale. CRP is a key acute-phase protein and a classic marker of systemic inflammation. As a central mediator of systemic inflammation, CRP directly drives endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis (12). Elevated serum CRP levels are associated with an increased risk of CKD (13). Serum albumin is not only a marker of nutritional reserves but also a negative acute-phase reactant; its synthesis decreases while its catabolism increases under inflammatory conditions, and decreased levels are closely associated with protein-energy wasting and poor prognosis (14, 15). Lymphocyte count reflects the state of adaptive immunity; in the context of CKD-associated chronic inflammation and uremia, it is prone to exhaustion and is closely linked to poor prognosis (16). The integration of these three components into the CALLY index theoretically provides a more comprehensive reflection of CVD risk in CKD patients. In recent years, emerging empirical evidence also supports the application value of the CALLY index in this context.

Recent studies shows that a higher CALLY index is an independent protective factor associated with reduced all-cause mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (17). Studies in patients with cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) also indicate that the CALLY index is inversely associated with CRS risk, and its predictive capability is superior to that of traditional inflammatory markers (18). Furthermore, derived from routinely available clinical parameters, this index offers practical advantages of accessibility and ease of calculation (19). Retrospective studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of the CALLY index across various conditions, showing inverse associations with peripheral artery disease (PAD) (20), depression (21), and stroke risk in hypertensive patients (22). Moreover, prior studies have shown superior prognostic performance compared to conventional biomarkers such as systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in CRS (18), hepatocellular carcinoma (19), colorectal cancer (23), and post - percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) coronary artery disease (CAD) (24), suggesting its potential as a more comprehensive risk assessment tool. However, to date, there are limited evidence on whether CALLY index affects the incidence of CVD and mortality among patients with CKD.

To address this knowledge gap, we utilized data from the UK Biobank to investigate the associations between the CALLY index and CVD incidence, all-cause and CVD-specific mortality in patients with CKD. In addition, we conducted comparative analyses against established inflammatory markers, including the SII, NLR, PLR, and LMR, aiming to establish its relative prediction superiority.

2 Methods

2.1 Study population

The UK Biobank is a large-scale, population-based prospective cohort study that recruited over 500,000 participants aged 40–69 years across the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2010. With a median follow-up period of 12 years, this comprehensive investigation aims to identify key determinants of disease development and progression. The study integrates multidimensional data, including detailed sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors (such as dietary habits, physical activity levels, and smoking status), family medical history, cognitive assessments, comprehensive physiological measurements, biological samples, and advanced imaging data. Health outcomes are systematically tracked through robust linkages to national electronic health records, encompassing mortality data, cancer registry information, hospital admission records, and primary care documentation, which enables the study to capture a wide spectrum of major diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, and various malignancies (25, 26). This study was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (Application ID: 95817).

In this study, we identified 34,925 participants with CKD. Individuals who met any of the following criteria defined as having CKD (1): estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (2); albuminuria (albumin to creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥ 30 mg/g); 3) CKD diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10, codes N18) (27). Individuals with missing lymphocyte counts (n = 1,582), missing albumin measurements (n = 3,991), missing CRP values (n = 129), and those with baseline CVD (n = 6,325) were excluded. Ultimately, 22,898 eligible participants were included for analyses of CALLY index and CVD incidence (including IHD, MI, and stroke), all-cause mortality, and CVD-specific mortality among individuals with CKD.

2.2 Assessment of CALLY index

The CALLY index is a composite metric integrating serum albumin levels (g/L), lymphocyte counts (10^9/L), and CRP values (mg/L) to provide a comprehensive assessment of systemic inflammatory and nutritional status, with detailed biomarker measurement descriptions available in the UK Biobank online showcase (https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase). Blood samples collected at baseline (2006–2010) were analyzed using standardized methods: serum albumin was measured via the BCG method on a Beckman Coulter AU5800 analyzer; lymphocyte count was derived from the “Lymphocyte Number” assay of UK Biobank, calculated as (lymphocytes/100) × white blood cell count; and CRP was quantified using a high-sensitivity immunoturbidimetric assay on a Beckman Coulter AU5800 platform. The index was calculated according to the established formula (19):

CALLY index = Albumin (g/L) × Lymphocyte (10^9/L)]/CRP (mg/L) × 10

2.3 Ascertainment of outcomes

The primary outcomes were the incidence of overall CVD, including IHD, stroke, and MI among patients with CKD. The secondary outcome was all-cause and CVD-specific mortality. Participants were followed from the time of enrollment to the date of incident CVD, loss to follow-up, death, or July 8, 2024, which ever occurred first. In this study, CVD were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes: including I20-I64 for overall CVD events, I20-I25 for IHD, I21-I23 for MI, I60-I64 for stroke, and I00-I99 for death resulting from CVD (27).

2.4 Assessment of covariates

At baseline enrollment, we systematically collected data on a comprehensive set of covariates, which we categorized into demographic characteristics, socioeconomic factors, lifestyle factors, anthropometric measurements, and medical condition. Demographic variables included age, sex (male/female), and self-reported ethnicity (categorized as White, Mixed, South Asian, Black, Chinese, or other). Socioeconomic status was assessed using the highest attained educational qualification (grouped as no relevant qualifications, college or university degree, A levels/AS levels or equivalent, O levels/GCSEs or equivalent, CSEs or equivalent, or others) and the Townsend deprivation index, an area-based measure of socioeconomic deprivation. For lifestyle factors, smoking status was classified as current, former, or never smoker and alcohol drinking status was categorized as never, past, or current drinking. Healthy diet score was assessing using a definition of ideal intake of healthy and unhealthy dietary components for cardiovascular, which includes increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish, dairy products and vegetable oils, and reduced or no consumption of refined grains, processed or unprocessed meats and sugar-sweetened beverages (28). To assess leisure-time physical activity, participants were asked: “In the past four weeks, have you engaged in any of the following activities: walking for pleasure, light do-it-yourself (DIY) projects, heavy DIY work, strenuous sports, other exercises, or none of the above?” For those who reported physical activity, information on both frequency and duration was collected. We quantified the intensity of these leisure-time activities using metabolic equivalent of task (MET) values, which represent the ratio of energy expenditure (per kilogram of body weight per hour) to the standard resting metabolic rate. The total weekly leisure-time physical activity was calculated in MET-minutes per week by multiplying the frequency, duration, and corresponding MET values for each activity. The assigned MET values were as follows: 3.5 for walking for pleasure, 2.5 for light DIY, 5.5 for heavy DIY, 8.0 for strenuous sports, and 4.0 for other physical activities (29, 30). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²). Renal function was assessed using eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) Medical conduction included self-reported or physician-diagnosed conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Family history of CVD was recorded as a binary variable (yes or no) based on reports of CVD in first-degree relatives.

2.5 Statistical analysis

The study population was categorized into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on CALLY index distribution. Baseline characteristics were reported as mean (standard deviation [SD]) for continuous variables and number (percentage) for categorical variables. Baseline characteristics across CALLY index quartiles were compared using one-way ANOVA for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. Participants with missing data for any key component of the CALLY index were excluded from the analysis. For the remaining covariates, missing data were handled as follows: categorical variables (including categorized continuous variables) assigned missing values to a separate “missing” category, which was then included in the regression models. This strategy was employed to preserve the overall sample size and statistical power of the analysis.

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of the CALLY index with risk of CVD incidence and mortality among CKD patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CVD incidence (including IHD, MI, and stroke), were evaluated through three sequential adjusted models: crude model was unadjusted, model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity (White, mixed background, south Asian, Black, Chinese, or other), educational attainment (no relevant qualifications, college or University degree, A levels/AS levels or equivalent, O levels/GCSEs or equivalent, CSEs or equivalent, or others), and socioeconomic deprivation; model 2 was further adjusted for BMI, smoking status (never, previous, or current), alcohol drinking (never, previous, or current), healthy diet, leisure time physical activity (<500, 500 to <1000, or ≥1000 MET mins/week), eGFR, family history of CVD, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals and was found to hold for all final models. The confounders included in the models were selected based on prior published evidence (27, 31), whereby covariates associated with the outcome or those that altered the effect estimate of the primary exposure by more than 10% were retained (32). To evaluate the presence of multicollinearity, we calculated the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) for all variables included in the regression models. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare cumulative incidence of CVD and mortality across quartiles of the CALLY index. Differences between survival curves were evaluated using the log-rank test. Furthermore, dose-response relationships were analyzed using restricted cubic splines (RCS) to assess potential nonlinear associations between the CALLY index and CVD incidence and mortality among CKD patients. We further applied two-segmented Cox proportional hazard models to examine the threshold effect of CALLY index on CVD incidence and mortality. Log-likelihood ratio test comparing one-line (non-segmented) model to segmented regression model was used to determine whether threshold exists. Subgroup analyses according to the covariates and sensitivity analyses excluding participants with less than 2 years of follow-up were conducted to evaluate the robustness of observed associations. To test the independent predictive capacity of the CALLY index, we calculated the Harrell’s C-index using bootstrap methods with 500 replications. The statistical comparison of the Harrell’s C-index among the four biomarkers was performed using the “compareC” package. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). A two-sided p-value <0.05 defined statistical significance.

3 Results

3.1 Baseline characteristics of the study population

Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of participants stratified by CALLY index quartiles. The study comprised a cohort of 22,898 individuals with CKD, with a mean age of 59.21 ± 7.72 years, including 10,061 (43.9%) males. Compared to participants in the lowest quartile of the CALLY index, those in the highest quartile were younger, more likely to be female, of non-White ethnicity, and have a healthy diet. They also exhibited higher educational attainment, greater engagement in leisure-time physical activity, and elevated eGFR levels, and tend to had a lower socioeconomic deprivation index, BMI, and proportion of never-smokers, and had higher proportion of current drinkers. Furthermore, they were less likely to report a family history of CVD, diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Among 22,898 participants included in the study, a total of 7,063 incident CVD events were observed, comprising 3,217 cases of IHD, 1,004 cases of MI, and 1,128 strokes. By the study exit date, 4247 (18.55%) individuals in the cohort had died; of those deaths, 973 (4.25%) were attributed to CVD.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of individuals with chronic kidney disease according to CALLY index in the UK Biobank.

3.2 Association between CALLY index and CVD incidence in patients with CKD

Associations between CALLY index and CVD incidence are shown in Table 2. We constructed three sequential models to assess the associations between the CALLY index and CVD incidence, including overall CVD, IHD, MI, and stroke. The multivariate analysis results showed that per 1-SD increase in CALLY index was associated with a 9% decreased risk of incident overall CVD (HR: 0.91, 95% CI:0.88, 0.94), a 12% decreased risk of incident IHD (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.84,0.93), a 16% reduced risk of incident MI (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.93), and a 6% reduced risk of incident stroke (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.02). Compared to CKD patients with the lowest quartile of CALLY (Q1), those with the highest quartile of CALLY (Q4) had decreased risk of incident overall CVD (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.75), IHD (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.78), MI (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.83), and stroke (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.88). Similar findings were also found in crude model and model 1 (all P < 0.001). The VIF values of all exposure and adjustment variables were below 10, indicating that multicollinearity was not a substantial concern in our main model (Supplementary Table S1). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that CKD patients with the lowest quartile of CALLY index, those with higher CALLY had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of overall CVD, IHD, MI, and stroke (log-rank P < 0.05) (Figures 1A-D).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Association between CALLY index and CVD incidence in CKD patients.

Figure 1
Six graphs show survival probabilities over time for various health indicators, categorized by CALLY index quartiles (Q1 to Q4). A: Overall CVD incidence. B: IHD incidence. C: MI incidence. D: Stroke incidence. E: All-cause mortality. F: CVD mortality. Each graph illustrates a decline in survival probability over 15 years, with Q1 showing the steepest decline.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CVD incidence and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality stratified by quartiles of CALLY index. (A) CVD incidence; (B) ischemic heart disease; (C) myocardial infarction; (D) stroke; (E) all-cause mortality; (F) CVD-specific mortality.

3.3 Association between the CALLY index and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKD

As presented in Table 3, the multivariate Cox regression models showed that the per 1-SD increase in CALLY index was negatively associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.90) and CVD-specific mortality (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.92). Furthermore, compared to CKD patients with the lowest quartile of CALLY (Q1), those with the highest quartile of CALLY (Q4) had a 45% decreased all-cause mortality (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.61) and a 46% decreased CVD-specific mortality (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.66). These associations remained significant in the crude model and model 1 (all P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality revealed the significant divergence between high and low CALLY index groups (log-rank P<0.05) (Figures 1E, F).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Association between CALLY index and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality in CKD patients.

3.4 Threshold effects of CALLY index on CVD incidence and mortality in patients with CKD

The RCS curves showed the significant L-shaped dose-response relationships between CALLY index and the CVD incidence (including overall CVD, IHD, MI, and stroke), all-cause and CVD-specific mortality (all Poverall < 0.001; Pnonlinear < 0.05) (Figures 2A-F). To evaluate the nonlinear associations between the CALLY index and corresponding outcomes, we further conducted segmented Cox proportional hazards regression analyses on both sides of the inflection point (Table 4). The results demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between the CALLY index and the risks of incident overall CVD, IHD, MI, stroke, as well as all-cause and CVD-specific mortality below the inflection point. However, beyond this threshold, no statistically significant associations were observed between the CALLY index and either CVD incidence or mortality outcomes.

Figure 2
Graphs A to F show the relationship between the CALLY index and various health outcomes: overall cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence, ischemic heart disease (IHD) incidence, myocardial infarction (MI) incidence, stroke incidence, all-cause mortality, and CVD mortality. Each graph depicts a downward trend with confidence intervals, showing negative associations between higher CALLY index values and health risks. Statistical significance is indicated by P values less than 0.001 for all graphs, suggesting strong evidence for these associations.

Figure 2. Dose-response association between CALLY index and CVD incidence and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality. (A) CVD incidence; (B) ischemic heart disease; (C) myocardial infarction; (D) stroke; (E) all-cause mortality; (F) CVD-specific mortality. Model was adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, educational attainment, and socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol drinking, healthy diet, leisure time physical activity, eGFR, family history of CVD, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Threshold effect analyses of CALLY index with CVD incidence and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality in CKD patients.

3.5 Subgroup and sensitivity analyses

Sensitivity analysis results showed that the associations remained robust after excluding participants with < 2 years of follow-up (Supplementary Tables S2, S3). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis excluding ethnicity from the covariates showed that the associations of the CALLY Index with CVD incidence and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality did not appreciably change (Supplementary Table S4). The subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent inverse associations between higher CALLY index and decreased risk of CVD incidence (including IHD, MI, and stroke) and mortality (all-cause and CVD-specific) across all predefined subgroups of CKD patients. No significant interactions were found for most subgroups (P for interaction >0.05), except for age in MI incidence and smoking status in MI and IHD incidence, where younger individuals and past/current smokers exhibited stronger inverse associations. Furthermore, patients with lower eGFR exhibited slightly stronger inverse associations between CALLY index and all-cause mortality (Supplementary Tables S5-S10).

3.6 Predictive value of CALLY index and other inflammatory biomarkers on CVD incidence and mortality

To evaluate and compare the independent predictive capacity of CALLY and other inflammatory biomarkers, including SII, MLR, and NLR, we calculated the Harrell’s C-index for CVD incidence and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality, as shown in Supplementary Figure S1. The results showed that CALLY exhibited a higher Harrell’s C-index for all outcomes compared to the other inflammatory biomarkers.

4 Discussion

Utilizing data from the UK Biobank, our study provides novel evidence supporting the CALLY index as an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in CKD patients. We observed significant inverse associations between the CALLY index and CVD incidence, all-cause mortality, and CVD-specific mortality, with higher index values consistently correlating with lower risks of these endpoints. Importantly, these associations remained robust even after extensive adjustment for key confounders, including lifestyle factors (diet, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption) and renal function (eGFR). These findings suggest that the CALLY index, integrating inflammatory, nutritional, and immunological markers, may serve as a valuable tool for risk stratification and mortality prediction in CKD patients, potentially enhancing early intervention strategies for this high-risk population.

To our knowledge, epidemiological evidence regarding the associations of CALLY index with incidence of CVD and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality remain unclear in patients with CKD. Based on a prospective cohort design, our findings provide the first evidence that CALLY index as an independent predictor of CVD incidence and prognosis in CKD patients, underscoring its potential for integration into clinical prediction models to enable personalized risk management. Notably, a prior cross-sectional analyses included 8,146 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database showed that the CALLY index may be a potential indicator for early identification of individuals at higher risk of stroke in hypertensive patients (22). Another study found the inverse relationship between the CALLY index and angina in United States adults (33). Interestingly, emerging evidence has demonstrated the significant negative associations between the CALLY index and risk of PAD (20), osteoarthritis (34), depression (21), and retinopathy (33). However, the aforementioned studies were primarily limited to cross-sectional designs with relatively small sample sizes. In addition, studies in the field of disease prognosis assessment have shown that CALLY index can be used as an independent prognostic factor for patients with COPD (35), acute ischemic stroke (36), CVD (37), sepsis (38), and multiple types of cancers (11, 23, 39, 40). By contrast, its potential utility in CKD populations remains to be fully elucidated, with no dedicated studies currently available in this specific patient cohort.

CVD risk emerges early in CKD and escalates progressively with disease severity (4, 41). CKD predisposes patients to diverse CVD subtypes, including IHD (42), MI (43), and stroke (44), driven by a pathophysiological triad of chronic inflammation, malnutrition, and immune dysfunction that synergistically accelerates CVD progression (45). Central to this process is low-grade microinflammation, characterized by elevated CRP-a hepatic acute-phase reactant upregulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 (46). In CKD, uremic toxin accumulation, oxidative stress, and gut dysbiosis perpetuate inflammatory pathway activation (47), increasing circulating CRP and IL-6. These mediators exacerbate endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerotic plaque instability (48, 49), and ultimately, thrombotic events such as MI and stroke (50, 51). Concurrently, lymphopenia, a marker of immunosuppression, reflects immunosenescence and malnutrition (52). Emerging therapies like finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), mitigate inflammation and renal injury while preserving potassium homeostasis, yet may inadvertently modulate T-cell function via the IL-17/IL-23 axis (53). Similarly, systemic immune-inflammation (e.g., elevated SII) exacerbates renal fibrosis by suppressing the anti-aging protein α-Klotho (54), further compounding CVD risk. Hypoalbuminemia, prevalent in CKD, reflecting both protein-energy wasting and inflammatory catabolism. Depleted albumin impairs antioxidant, anticoagulant, and endothelial protective functions, promoting coronary stenosis and thrombosis (55). Given the complex pathophysiology of CVD, reliance on a single biomarker is likely insufficient to comprehensively capture multidimensional health risk of patients. Instead, integrated indices like the CALLY index, combining CRP (inflammation), albumin (nutrition), and lymphocytes (immunity) (36, 56), offer a holistic assessment of this pathogenic triad (37, 49), thereby overcoming the limitations of conventional single-parameter biomarkers. Higher CALLY values signify optimal inflammatory control and immune-nutritional homeostasis, supporting its utility in risk stratification and personalized CVD prevention.

In the present study, the RCS analyses revealed significant nonlinear, L-shaped associations between the CALLY index and all examined clinical endpoints (CVD incidence, all-cause mortality, and CVD-specific mortality). This nonlinear pattern indicates a saturation effect, where excessively low CALLY index values are associated with increased risk of CVD events, while intermediate and high levels confer optimal protection. Previous studies have also reported similar L-shaped associations between the CALLY index and various health outcomes, including all-cause mortality in rheumatoid arthritis patients (57), stroke (58), and angina pectoris risk (59). The observed L-shaped relationships may be attributed to the role of CALLY index as an integrative biomarker of inflammation, nutrition, and immune homeostasis. At low CALLY levels, the concomitant presence of chronic inflammation, malnutrition, and immune dysregulation likely synergistically promotes the CVD pathogenesis. As the CALLY index increases, the mitigation of these pathological processes may explain the plateau in risk reduction at intermediate-to-high levels, where further increments no longer confer additional benefits (59). This saturation effect may align with biological thresholds beyond which inflammation is adequately controlled, nutritional reserves are sufficient, and immune responses reach equilibrium. Notably, the consistency of L-shaped associations across diverse endpoints and populations underscores the broad utility of CALLY index in risk stratification, while its non-linearity highlights the need for targeted interventions in individuals with critically low values. The inflection point of this curve provides a practical threshold for risk stratification. The primary clinical utility of this index lies in risk stratification. Moreover, compared with traditional risk scores based on demographic and metabolic parameters, the CALLY index offers a direct and complementary measure that reflects the pathological interplay of inflammation, nutrition, and immunity relevant to CKD. Future research should focus on prospectively validating this specific threshold in independent cohorts and exploring whether integrating the CALLY index with established risk models enhances prognostic accuracy for CKD patients.

Our study has several strengths. Firstly, the inclusion of participants from the UK Biobank based on a nationally-representative population provided a relatively large sample size and extended follow-up period, ensuring robust statistical power for detecting clinically meaningful associations and mitigating risks of selection bias. Secondly, we comprehensively adjusted for key confounders including sociodemographic characteristics, detailed lifestyle factors, dietary, anthropometric measures, and complete medical history, which substantially reduces potential confounding effects. Thirdly, to examine the robustness of our findings, we comprehensively conducted sensitivity and subgroup analyses and found that the results were largely unchanged. Moreover, our study employed RCS analysis to comprehensively characterize the complex dose-response relationships between the CALLY index and incidence of CVD and all-cause and CVD-specific mortality, and identified precise inflection points where CALLY index values demonstrated maximum protective effects against outcomes through further application of two-segmented Cox proportional hazard models. This methodological innovation may contribute to determining clinically meaningful threshold values that may inform future risk stratification protocols.

However, several limitations warrant consideration when interpreting our results. Firstly, the single measurement of CRP, albumin, and lymphocyte may not adequately capture their dynamic biological variations. Future longitudinal studies incorporating repeated assessments would be valuable to better characterize the temporal trajectory of the CALLY index and its association with cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with CKD, thereby improving causal inference. Secondly, as an observational study, our findings demonstrate associations but cannot establish causality. Despite extensive covariate adjustment, potential confounding by unmeasured factors such as environmental exposures, genetic predispositions, or medication use (e.g., statins, anti-inflammatory agents, dialysis therapy) remain possible. Thirdly, and importantly, the predominantly White European ancestry of UK Biobank participants significantly limits the generalizability of our findings. Differences in genetic background, lifestyle, comorbidities, and the prevalence and etiology of CKD across ethnic groups may influence the association between the CALLY index and cardiovascular outcomes. Therefore, our results require explicit validation in more ethnically and geographically diverse populations, before they can be considered broadly applicable. Future studies should elucidate associations between the CALLY index and underlying pathophysiological pathways of CVD in CKD models, while designing and implementing CALLY-directed precision intervention trials (nutritional/anti-inflammatory regimens) to develop prognostic risk reduction strategies for CVD in CKD populations.

5 Conclusions

In this large prospective cohort study of patients with CKD, we demonstrated that a moderate-to-high CALLY index was significantly associated with a reduced risk of CVD events-including IHD, MI, and stroke, as well as lower all-cause and CVD-specific mortality. In addition, our findings suggest that the CALLY index shows a stronger association with cardiovascular risk than conventional inflammatory biomarkers, independent of traditional risk factors. Importantly, our results highlight the clinical utility of the CALLY index as an objective and integrative tool for early CVD risk stratification in CKD patients.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

CJ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. QZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. JF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. SL: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. MF: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. HB: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. SJL: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. LC: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1100604). The Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2023J05199); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024M751832).

Acknowledgments

The author’s work on this manuscript was supported by their institution.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1729647/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Drawz P and Rahman M. Chronic kidney disease. Ann Internal Med. (2015) 162:Itc1–16. doi: 10.7326/AITC201506020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ferro CJ, Wanner C, Luyckx V, Fontana M, Gallego D, Vanholder R, et al. A call for urgent action on chronic kidney disease across Europe. Lancet regional Health Europe. (2025) 54:101347. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101347

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lou-Meda R and Pérez JB. Reducing the burden of chronic kidney disease in the world. Lancet (London England). (2025) 405:1810. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00548-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Matsushita K, Ballew SH, Wang AY, Kalyesubula R, Schaeffner E, and Agarwal R. Epidemiology and risk of cardiovascular disease in populations with chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrology. (2022) 18:696–707. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00616-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Speer T, Dimmeler S, Schunk SJ, Fliser D, and Ridker PM. Targeting innate immunity-driven inflammation in CKD and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Nephrology. (2022) 18:762–78. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00621-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Graterol Torres F, Molina M, Soler-Majoral J, Romero-González G, Rodríguez Chitiva N, Troya-Saborido M, et al. Evolving concepts on inflammatory biomarkers and malnutrition in chronic kidney disease. Nutrients. (2022) 14:4297. doi: 10.3390/nu14204297

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Frostegard J. Immunity, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. BMC Med. (2013) 11:117. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Casas R, Castro-Barquero S, Estruch R, and Sacanella E. Nutrition and cardiovascular health. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) 19:3988. doi: 10.3390/ijms19123988

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Phillips A, Shaper AG, and Whincup PH. Association between serum albumin and mortality from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other causes. Lancet (London England). (1989) 2:1434–6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92042-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ilatovskaya DV, Halade GV, and DeLeon-Pennell KY. Adaptive immunity-driven inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circulatory Physiol. (2019) 317:H1254–H1257. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00642.2019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Iida H, Tani M, Komeda K, Nomi T, Matsushima H, Tanaka S, et al. Superiority of CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index (CALLY index) as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB: Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc. (2022) 24:101–15. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Melnikov I, Kozlov S, Saburova O, Avtaeva Y, Guria K, and Gabbasov Z. Monomeric C-reactive protein in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: advances and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:2079. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032079

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Gao J, Wang A, Li X, Li J, Zhao H, Zhang J, et al. The cumulative exposure to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts the risk of chronic kidney diseases. Kidney Blood Pressure Res. (2020) 45:84–94. doi: 10.1159/000504251

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mukai H, Villafuerte H, Qureshi AR, Lindholm B, and Stenvinkel P. Serum albumin, inflammation, and nutrition in end-stage renal disease: C-reactive protein is needed for optimal assessment. Semin dialysis. (2018) 31:435–9. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12731

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Benson MD. Acute-phase reactants. Curr Opin Rheumatol. (1989) 1:209–14. doi: 10.1097/00002281-198901020-00014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Gao W, Wang X, Zou Y, Wang S, Dou J, and Qian S. Progress in the application of novel inflammatory indicators in chronic kidney disease. Front Med. (2025) 12:1500166. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1500166

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Huang J, Hao J, Luo H, Chen L, Luo H, Liu H, et al. Construction of a C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index-based prediction model for all-cause mortality in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Renal failure. (2025) 47:2444396. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2444396

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Xu Z, Tang J, Xin C, Jin Y, Zhang H, and Liang R. Associations of C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index with cardiorenal syndrome: Insights from a population-based study. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e37197. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37197

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Müller L, Hahn F, Mähringer-Kunz A, Stoehr F, Gairing SJ, Michel M, et al. Immunonutritive scoring for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization: evaluation of the CALLY index. Cancers. (2021) 13:5018. doi: 10.3390/cancers13195018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wu Z, Fu L, Liu X, Gong C, Wu Q, Li W, et al. The relationship between C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index and peripheral artery disease. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:24380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09898-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hu W, Yuan Q, Hu J, Li M, Xi Y, and Luo L. The association between C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index and depression in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study from NHANES. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2025) 176:107442. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2025.107442

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Fan X, Qing D, Zhao J, Luo Y, Li X, Tan W, et al. The relationship between CALLY index and stroke in hypertensive patients: insights from NHANES. Front Nutr. (2025) 12:1592641. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1592641

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Yang M, Lin SQ, Liu XY, Tang M, Hu CL, Wang ZW, et al. Association between C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer: From the investigation on nutrition status and clinical outcome of common cancers study. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1131496. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1131496

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Pan Y, Wu TT, Deng CJ, Jiang ZH, Yang Y, Hou XG, et al. Association between the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index and adverse clinical outcomes in CAD patients after PCI: findings of a real-world study. Rev Cardiovasc Med. (2024) 25:111. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504111

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PloS Med. (2015) 12:e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Allen NE, Lacey B, Lawlor DA, Pell JP, Gallacher J, Smeeth L, et al. Prospective study design and data analysis in UK Biobank. Sci Trans Med. (2024) 16:eadf4428. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adf4428

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhao S, Chen X, Wan Z, Geng T, Lu Q, Yu H, et al. Associations of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms with risks of cardiovascular disease and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. (2024) 119:1397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.04.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Said MA, Verweij N, and van der Harst P. Associations of combined genetic and lifestyle risks with incident cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the UK biobank study. JAMA Cardiol. (2018) 3:693–702. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1717

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr., Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci sports Exercise. (2011) 43:1575–81. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chudasama YV, Khunti K, Gillies CL, Dhalwani NN, Davies MJ, Yates T, et al. Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy in people with multimorbidity in the UK Biobank: A longitudinal cohort study. PloS Med. (2020) 17:e1003332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003332

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Thompson AS, Gaggl M, Bondonno NP, Jennings A, O’Neill JK, Hill C, et al. Adherence to a healthful plant-based diet and risk of mortality among individuals with chronic kidney disease: A prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh Scotland). (2024) 43:2448–57. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Jaddoe VW, de Jonge LL, Hofman A, Franco OH, Steegers EA, and Gaillard R. First trimester fetal growth restriction and cardiovascular risk factors in school age children: population based cohort study. BMJ (Clinical Res ed). (2014) 348:g14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g14

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Li P, Chen F, Li L, and Wu J. The association between the C-reactive protein-to-albumin-to-lymphocyte index and retinopathy: insights from a population-based study. Front Nutr. (2025) 12:1552020. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1552020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Geng M and Zhang K. CRP-Albumin-Lymphocyte index (CALLYI) as a risk-predicting biomarker in association with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. (2025) 27:57. doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03530-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ding Y, Liu Y, Yu J, Cai C, Fu L, Zhu J, et al. The association between the CALLY index and all-cause mortality in patients with COPD: results from the cohort study of NHANES 2007-2010. Int J chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. (2025) 20:159–69. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S485036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Pan Y, Liu Z, Tu R, Feng X, Yu F, Wei M, et al. The value of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index (CALLY index) as a prognostic biomarker in acute ischemic stroke. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:13672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97538-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Han D, Wu L, Zhou H, Xue Y, He S, Ma Z, et al. Associations of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with cardiovascular disease: evidence from the NHANES 2001-2010. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2025) 25:144. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04596-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhang J, Zhao Q, Liu S, Yuan N, and Hu Z. Clinical predictive value of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index for prognosis of critically ill patients with sepsis in intensive care unit: a retrospective single-center observational study. Front Public Health. (2024) 12:1395134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zhang H, Shi J, Xie H, Liu X, Ruan G, Lin S, et al. Superiority of CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index as a prognostic biomarker for patients with gastric cancer. Nutr (Burbank Los Angeles County Calif). (2023) 116:112191. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Meng P, Gu T, Xu J, Huang H, Jin H, Wang Y, et al. Pretreatment CALLY index as promising novel biomarker in the prediction of surgical and oncological outcomes in esophageal cancer: a multi-center retrospective cohort study. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1605067. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1605067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Marx-Schütt K, Cherney DZI, Jankowski J, Matsushita K, Nardone M, and Marx N. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. Eur Heart J. (2025) 46:2148–60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf167

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Hutcheson JD and Goettsch C. Cardiovascular calcification heterogeneity in chronic kidney disease. Circ Res. (2023) 132:993–1012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.321760

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lidgard B, Zelnick LR, O’Brien KD, and Bansal N. Patient-reported symptoms and subsequent risk of myocardial infarction in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrology: CJASN. (2022) 17:487–95. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12080921

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Abramson JL, Jurkovitz CT, Vaccarino V, Weintraub WS, and McClellan W. Chronic kidney disease, anemia, and incident stroke in a middle-aged, community-based population: the ARIC Study. Kidney Int. (2003) 64:610–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00109.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Mullins AP and Arjmandi BH. Health benefits of plant-based nutrition: focus on beans in cardiometabolic diseases. Nutrients. (2021) 13:519. doi: 10.3390/nu13020519

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Hou FF, Ren H, Owen WF Jr., Guo ZJ, Chen PY, Schmidt AM, et al. Enhanced expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. (2004) 15:1889–96. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000131526.99506.f7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Akchurin OM and Kaskel F. Update on inflammation in chronic kidney disease. Blood purification. (2015) 39:84–92. doi: 10.1159/000368940

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Drüeke TB and Massy ZA. Atherosclerosis in CKD: differences from the general population. Nat Rev Nephrology. (2010) 6:723–35. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.143

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Luo L, Li M, Xi Y, Hu J, and Hu W. C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index as a feasible nutrition-immunity-inflammation marker of the outcome of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly. Clin Nutr ESPEN. (2024) 63:346–53. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.06.054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Burger PM, Koudstaal S, Mosterd A, Fiolet ATL, Teraa M, van der Meer MG, et al. C-reactive protein and risk of incident heart failure in patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2023) 82:414–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Kuppa A, Tripathi H, Al-Darraji A, Tarhuni WM, and Abdel-Latif A. C-reactive protein levels and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A two-sample bidirectional mendelian randomization study. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:9129. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119129

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Xydonas S, Parissis J, Lioni L, Kapsimali V, Psarra E, Farmakis D, et al. Immunosenescence in patients with chronic systolic heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown Md). (2016) 17:624–30. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000372

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Wang QR and Yang Y. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists promote renal immunosenescence. Int Urol Nephrol. (2025) 57:3299–3306. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04530-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Wen Z, Liu X, and Zhang T. L-shaped association of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) with serum soluble α-Klotho in the prospective cohort study from the NHANES database. . Sci Rep. (2024) 14:13189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64050-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Zhang Y, Wu M, and Mao C. Risk factors and their association with mortality in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis or/and kidney transplant patients or late-stage chronic kidney disease: A single center, prospective observational study. Medicine. (2024) 103:e36805. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036805

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Zhao H, Yin B, Li XR, Liu XY, Bu ZT, and Shi HP. The CRP-albumin-lymphocyte index provides enhanced prognostic value in liver cancer compared to the TNM staging system. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:20090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03985-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Zhang J, Lin Y, Zeng J, Luo G, Liao P, Chen Q, et al. The C-reactive protein (CRP)-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index exhibits an L-shaped association with all-cause mortality in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Rheumatol. (2025) 9:47. doi: 10.1186/s41927-025-00499-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Chen Y, Liu M, Zhang Y, Yang X, Yue M, Chen X, et al. Association between C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index and stroke: an NHANES analysis (1999-2010). Front neurology. (2025) 16:1548666. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1548666

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ye J, Chen L, Xu D, Li R, Lan R, Chen S, et al. Inverse association between CALLY index and angina pectoris in US adults: a population-based study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2025) 25:94. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04544-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, C-reactive protein-to-albumin-to-lymphocyte index, nonlinear, UK Biobank

Citation: Jiang C, Zhou Q, Feng J, Liu S, Fan M, Bai H, Lin S and Chen L (2026) Association between the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index and cardiovascular incidence and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective study. Front. Immunol. 17:1729647. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1729647

Received: 21 October 2025; Accepted: 22 January 2026; Revised: 29 December 2025;
Published: 06 February 2026.

Edited by:

Yongbo Kang, Shanxi Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Yinghong Zhai, Tongji University, China
Chenglin Ye, People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

Copyright © 2026 Jiang, Zhou, Feng, Liu, Fan, Bai, Lin and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Liyong Chen, Y2hlbmxlNzNAc2luYS5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.