ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research TopicCombination Cancer Therapies and Systems ImmunologyView all 6 articles
Integration of MRI Radiomics with Immune Profiling to Predict Response to CDK6 inhibitors in High-Grade Glioma
Provisionally accepted- 1The Fifth People's Hospital of Datong, Datong, China
- 2Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
- 3First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: We hypothesized that an integrated Radiomics–Immune Score (R/I-Score), combining MRI-derived tumor heterogeneity with peripheral immune profiling, would predict progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from CDK6 inhibitor–containing therapy (CDK6i). Methods: We conducted a two-center, retrospective cohort study. The final study population comprised 116 adult patients who had undergone baseline MRI within 21 days prior to treatment initiation. To ensure methodological rigor and internal consistency, we adopted a two-stage study design. In the first stage (Biological Modeling), the total cohort (N=116) was partitioned into a training set (n=81) and an independent testing set (n=35) to develop and validate the R/I-Score. In the second stage (Clinical Validation), we addressed the selection bias inherent in observational data by performing 1:2 Propensity Score Matching (PSM). This yielded a balanced analytical cohort of 108 patients (36 treated with CDK6i and 72 concurrent controls). The primary endpoint was the treatment-by-biomarker interaction for progression-free survival (PFS), specifically assessing the R/I-Score's ability to stratify therapeutic responders. Results: In the overall matched cohort (N=108), patients treated with CDK6i exhibited numerical but statistically non-significant trends toward improved efficacy compared to concurrent controls in terms of median PFS (4.8 vs. 3.5 months; HR 0.72, P=0.091), objective response rate (19.4% vs. 9.7%; P=0.180), and disease control rate (44.4% vs. 30.6%; P=0.165). The Combined R/I-Clinical Model demonstrated exceptional diagnostic performance in the independent testing cohort (N=108), achieving a Treatment-Effect AUC of 0.97 and excellent calibration. In the PSM efficacy analysis, the R/I-Score successfully identified a distinct responder subpopulation: patients with a High R/I-Score derived significant survival benefit from CDK6i compared to concurrent controls (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.25–0.91; P=0.008), whereas those with a Low R/I-Score did not (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.58–1.92). The interaction between the R/I-Score and treatment was statistically significant (Pinteraction=0.012). Furthermore, High R/I-Score patients achieved superior objective response rates (33.3% vs. 5.6%) and sustained treatment duration (median 6 vs. 3 cycles) without increased toxicity (Grade ≥3 AEs: P>0.05). Biological interpretability analysis revealed that the score was driven by tumor morphological complexity and NK/CD8+ T-cell infiltration. Conclusions: The multi-modal R/I-Score serves as a robust, non-invasive predictive biomarker for CDK6i therapy in GBM.
Keywords: CDK6 inhibitor, high-grade glioma, immuno-profiling, precision oncology, predictive biomarker, Progression-free survival, Radiomics
Received: 29 Oct 2025; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Wang, Li, Li, She, Liu, Miao, Liu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jianfang Wang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
