SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research TopicPredictive Biomarkers to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung CancerView all 14 articles
Controlling nutritional status score predicts clinical outcome in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou, China
- 2Suqian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suqian, China
- 3Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, Nanjing, China
- 4Suqian First Hospital, Suqian, China
- 5Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: To investigate the association between pretreatment controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and clinical outcomes for cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Medline and Embase from inception of the databases to November 2025 to identify eligible studies concerning the relationship between pretreatment CONUT and survival outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICIs. Published data were extracted and risk ratio (RR) for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), progressive-free survival (PFS), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Data were analyzed using Stata14.0 software. Results: Ten studies involving 747 participants were included in this study. Patients were divided into low CONUT group and high CONUT group according to the cut-off value of CONUT score. Patients in high CONUT group had worse ORR and DCR than those in low CONUT group (RR 1.39, 95%CI 1.04-1.86;RR 1.64, 95%CI 1.32-2.03). Patients in high CONUT group had shorter PFS and OS than those in low CONUT group (1.71, 95%CI 1.21-2.42; 1.95, 95%CI 1.21-3.14). Subgroup analysis of cut-off value showed that PFS and OS of patients in high CONUT group were significantly shorter with a cut-off value of 3, and PFS of patients in high CONUT group were also worse than those of patients in the low CONUT group. Subgroup analysis of country indicated that both patients from Japan in high CONUT group had worse PFS and OS than those in low CONUT group, the OS of patients from China in high CONUT group was shorter than those in low CONUT group. Conclusion: The CONUT score has potential value as an effective biomarker for the efficacy and prognosis of cancer patients treated with ICIs. In the future, large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to determine the optimal cut-off value of CONUT, and to explore whether early and proactive nutritional and anti-inflammatory support based on CONUT score can reverse the adverse prognosis.
Keywords: Cancer, Controlling nutritional status, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Immunonutrition, Meta-analysis, prognosis
Received: 21 Nov 2025; Accepted: 02 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Zhang, Zhang, Ling and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tao Ling
Lingli Huang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
