Abstract
Tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins constitute a versatile family of E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate key signaling pathways governing innate and adaptive immune responses. Their ability to modify receptor-proximal adaptors, transcription factors, and pattern recognition receptors positions them as central modulators of antiviral defense, cytokine production, and immune homeostasis. Dysregulated TRIM expression or activity contributes to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, including SLE, Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and type I diabetes. This review summarizes the role of TRIM proteins in innate and adaptive immunity and their signaling axis linked to autoimmune and immune-related pathologies. It also focuses on the emerging therapeutic potential, targets and clinical strategies for targeting TRIM proteins.
1 Introduction
Innate immunity functions as the initial line of defense against microbial pathogens. A diverse group of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) present on immune cells detects a wide spectrum of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), including lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins (1). Among the various PRR families, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), Nod-like receptors (NLRs), and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) are the most extensively studied (2, 3). Activation of these receptors starts signaling cascades that involve nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and interferon regulatory factor (IRF) families, thereby regulating the synthesis of pro-inflammatory mediators and the expression of co-stimulatory molecules, ultimately initiating adaptive immune responses (4, 5). The evidence shows that TRIM proteins interact with PRR pathways, modulating the signaling cascades triggered by PRRs to influence immune responses. These interactions suggest a regulatory function of TRIM proteins in immune signaling and the maintenance of immune homeostasis. Conversely, the adaptive immune system produces a more specialized response supported by T and B lymphocytes, which employ highly specific antigen-recognizing receptors, T cell receptors (TCRs) and B cell receptors (BCRs), accordingly. Aberrant cytokine production and dysregulated PRR signaling pathways are strongly associated with the development of autoimmune diseases (6, 7). During these pathological conditions, numerous immune cells invade significant tissues and discharge inflammatory mediators into the peripheral circulation, thereby promoting the onset and progression of autoimmune disorders (8–10).
Tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins represent a predominant family of E3 ubiquitin ligases, consisting of over 70 members in humans. These proteins feature a conserved N-terminal tripartite “RBCC” motif, comprising a RING finger domain, one or two B-box domains, and a coiled-coil domain (Figure 1) (11). Ubiquitination represents a vital post-translational modification mechanism in eukaryotic cells, regulating vital biological processes including DNA damage repair, cell cycle progression, and signal transduction (12). The proliferation of the TRIM multigene family closely aligns with the evolution of innate and adaptive immunity, suggesting that TRIM proteins are crucial in modulating complex immune functions (13).
Figure 1
Accumulating evidence indicates that the expression of TRIM proteins is significantly influenced by diverse stimuli, including interferons (IFNs), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and viral components (14, 15). Recent studies further highlight the significance of TRIM proteins in regulating host immune responses and the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases (16). TRIMs have demonstrated an impact on key immunological processes, including the production of type I interferons (IFN-1) and pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (17, 18). A defining feature of TRIM proteins is their context-dependent capacity to function as either positive or negative regulators of immune signaling, depending on cellular state, stimulus and temporal dynamics. In this review, we comprehensively evaluate the immunoregulatory roles of TRIM family proteins and their mechanistic involvement in modulating innate and adaptive immune signaling pathways. Furthermore, we examine current evidence linking dysregulated TRIM activity to autoimmune and immune-mediated disorders, and discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting TRIM proteins, along with possible targeting strategies for future clinical interventions.
2 Structural organization of TRIM proteins
TRIM proteins are structurally defined by a conserved N-terminal RBCC motif, comprising a RING finger domain, BBox domains, and a CC region, followed by a varied C-terminal domain (Figure 1) (19). This modular arrangement constitutes the structural foundation for their diverse biological functions. These roles encompass immunological regulation, apoptosis, and transcriptional control.
The Really Interesting New Gene (RING) finger domain, generally composed of 40-60 amino acid residues (20), serves as the catalytic core of TRIM proteins. As a zinc-binding motif, it enables the transfer of ubiquitin from E2 conjugating enzymes to designated substrate proteins, thus establishing E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. The RING domain structurally aligns two zinc ions in a crossed-brace conformation, which is essential for maintaining its enzymatic function (21). Adjacent to the RING domain are one or two B-box domains, each consisting of approximately 32-42 amino acid residues (20). These domains are zinc-binding motifs that facilitate protein-protein interactions, mediating the homo- or hetero-oligomerization of TRIM proteins. While the exact molecular mechanisms of B-box areas remain less well understood compared to the RING domain, mutations within B-box regions have been associated with autoimmune pathological diseases, underscoring their functional relevance (22). The B-box domains are also thought to affect the stability and oligomerization of TRIM proteins, therefore influencing their structural integrity and regulatory potential (23).
The coiled-coil region serves as a crucial region for the oligomerization of TRIM proteins, facilitating the formation of higher-order complexes. This domain promotes the assembly of functional complexes, which enhance the concentration of enzymatic components and offer a scaffolding framework for interacting partners. Consequently, the coiled-coil region is vital for determining the specificity, efficiency, and amplification of intracellular signaling cascades. Following the coiled-coil region, the C-terminal domain of TRIM proteins has considerable structural variability, which dictates their functional diversity. TRIM proteins are categorized into 11 subfamilies (C-I to C-XI) based on their composition of this particular region. The most predominant C-terminal module is the SPRY (also known as B30.2) domain, although other domains such as PRY/SPRY, MATH, PHD, and NHL are also represented (22). The PRY/SPRY domain is a key determinant of innate immune function in several TRIM proteins. It supports viral protein recognition and subcellular targeting (24). This domain in TRIM25 mediates RNA binding and is essential for its ubiquitination activity. TRIM23 modulates innate immune signaling through its ARF-like C-terminal domain, which possesses intrinsic GTPase activity. This domain supports TRIM23-mediated, K27-linked ubiquitination of TBK1 and promotes type I IFN responses. Another common C-terminal domain is the COS domain, which mediates association with microtubules and contributes to antiviral activity. The FN3 domain supports interactions with DNA and heparin. The PHD domain is predominantly found in nuclear TRIM proteins and has been linked to chromatin-associated transcriptional control. These domains mediate selective substrate recognition, subcellular localization, and pathway activation, thus providing the structural basis for the remarkable functional diversity observed among members of the TRIM family. This heterogeneity allows TRIM proteins to engage in a wide range of molecular interactions, thereby influencing multiple signaling pathways and expanding their functional versatility (Figure 2) (22, 25). Among the extensive TRIM family, many members have been characterized for their crucial involvement in immune regulation, particularly within innate immune responses to viral infections.
Figure 2
3 Mechanistic framework and functional diversity of TRIM proteins in immune regulation
Mechanistically, many TRIM proteins function as E3 ubiquitin ligases, facilitating the transfer of ubiquitin molecules to specific substrates, thus modulating their stability, activity, and trafficking in immunological signaling (21). TRIM-mediated ubiquitination includes both canonical K48-linked polyubiquitin chains that direct substrates for proteasomal degradation, and non-degradative linkages like K63 and K27-linked chains promote signal propagation through scaffold formation and adaptor recruitment (26). Through these ubiquitination-dependent and ubiquitin-like modifications, TRIM proteins integrate structural features with ubiquitin linkage diversity, regulate signaling hubs and multiprotein complexes across innate and adaptive immunity (Table 1) (71).
Table 1
| TRIM protein | Target molecule | Biochemical action | Effect on signaling | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIM4 | RIG-I (CARDs) | Mediates K63-linked polyubiquitination of RIG-I CARDs to enhance receptor activation. | Positive regulator that enhances IRF3 & NF-κB activation and promotes IFN-β transcription. | (27) |
| TRIM5α | TAK1 (via free/unanchored K63 ubiquitin chains) | Generates free K63-linked polyubiquitin chains that acts as scaffolds to recruit & activate the TAK1 complex. | Positive regulator that promotes TAK1 activation & downstream AP-1/NF-κB signaling. | (28, 29) |
| TRIM9 | β-TrCP | Interacts with β-TrCP and stabilizes IκBα and p100 | Negative regulator of canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways through stabilization of inhibitory components. | (30) |
| TRIM9s | TBK1 | Undergoes self-K63-linked autoubiquitination recruiting GSK3β to TBK1 & facilitating TBK1 phosphorylation. | Positive modulator of TBK1 activation and downstream IRF3 signaling. | (31) |
| TRIM11 | TBK1 | Physically associates with TBK1 and inhibits its phosphorylation and activation. | Negative regulator that dampens TBK1-mediated IFN induction. | (32) |
| TRIM12c (mouse) | TRAF6 | Interacts with TRAF6 and induces TRAF6 ubiquitination. | Positive regulator in mouse models; stimulates IFN & NF-κB pathways (Trim12c is a Trim5 family member). | (33) |
| TRIM13 | TRAF6 | Induces TRAF6 ubiquitination; specific ubiquitin linkage type was defined in follow-up studies. | Positive modulator of TLR2-mediated NF-κB activation; enhances cytokine production. | (34) |
| TRIM13 | MDA5 | Interacts with MDA5 & attenuates its downstream signaling; precise ubiquitin linkage not detailed. | Negative regulator of MDA5-mediated IFN-I production. | (35) |
| TRIM14 | MAVS | Serves as a scaffold linking MAVS and NEMO to assemble the signaling complex; lacks catalytic RING domain. | Positive modulator that strengthens MAVS-mediated NF-κB and IRF3 activation. | (36) |
| TRIM14 | cGAS | Recruits deubiquitinase USP15 to prevent K48-linked degradation of cGAS. | Positive regulator that stabilizes cGAS and promotes cGAS-mediated IFN responses. | (37) |
| TRIM19 IV (PML-IV) | Pin1 (and IRF3 interactions) | Regulates the cellular distribution of Pin1 and associates with activated IRF3 in a context-dependent manner. | Modulatory function influencing IRF3 stability & localization, thereby adjusting IFN output. | (38, 39) |
| TRIM19 (PML) | RelA/p65 | Physical interacts with RelA/p65 & modulates transcriptional activity. | Regulatory function limiting NF-κB transcriptional output by preventing RelA/p65 binding to target genes. | (40) |
| TRIM20 (Pyrin/MEFV) | IκBα and p65 (NF-κB axis) | PYD domain interacts with IκBα and p65 to promote IκBα degradation & p65 nuclear translocation; functionally linked to inflammasome activity. | Context-dependent regulator that can enhance NF-κB activation and is associated with autoinflammatory disease (FMF) when mutated. | (41) |
| TRIM21 (Ro52/SS-A) | IRF7/IRF3 | Ubiquitinates IRF7 and IRF3 causing proteasomal degradation; also mediates autophagic degradation of IRF3. | Negative feedback regulator of IFN-I production; prevents excessive antiviral signaling. | (42, 43) |
| TRIM21 | TAK1 | Generates free K63-linked polyubiquitin chains that activate TAK1. | Context-dependent positive regulator promoting TAK1 activation and downstream NF-κB & MAPK signaling. | (44) |
| TRIM21 | IKKβ | Catalyzes monoubiquitination of IKKβ which targets IKKβ to autophagolysosome for degradation. | Negative regulator of NF-κB signaling through reduction of IKKβ levels. | (45) |
| TRIM21 | DDX41 | Catalyzes K48-linked polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of DDX41. | Negative regulator that suppresses DDX41-dependent DNA-sensing & IFN-I production. | (46) |
| TRIM22 | TAB2 | Targets TAB2 for degradation, thereby limiting TRAF6/TAB2-dependent signaling. | Negative regulator of NF-κB activation. | (47) |
| TRIM23 | NEMO; TRAF6 | Mediates K27-linked ubiquitination of NEMO & promotes TRAF6 autoubiquitination | Positive modulator of NF-κB and IFN signaling supporting TLR3 & RLR responses. | (48, 49) |
| TRIM25 | RIG-I (CARDs)/MAVS | Catalyzes K63-linked polyubiquitination of RIG-I CARDs (notably K172)leading to activation of RIG-I; also ubiquitinates MAVS to facilitate signal release. | Positive regulator that promotes RIG-I -MAVS interaction and induces robust IFN-I production. | (50, 51) |
| TRIM26 | NEMO/IRF3 | Bridges TBK1 to NEMO (positive) but also promotes K48-linked ubiquitination & degradation of IRF3 (negative). | Context-dependent regulator that can both promote and suppress TBK1-IRF3 axis depending on conditions. | (52, 53) |
| TRIM27 (RFP) | IKKs (IKKα/IKKβ/IKKϵ) | Physically interacts with canonical & noncanonical IKK family members. | Generally negative regulator of IFN and NF-κB signaling; silencing enhances ISRE & NF-κB activity. | (54) |
| TRIM28 (KAP1) | IRF7 | Promotes SUMOylation of IRF7 (E3-like activity in the modification process). | Negative regulator of IRF7 transactivation resulting in suppression of IFN transcription. | (55) |
| TRIM29 | NEMO | Mediates K48-linked polyubiquitination of NEMO leading to proteasomal degradation. | Negative regulator of NF-κB and antiviral responses; suppresses IFN & cytokine production. | (56) |
| TRIM30α (mouse) | TAB2/TAB3 (TAK1 complex) | Interacts with TAK1 complex and promotes TAB2 & TAB3 degradation through a non-proteasomal mechanism. | Negative regulator of LPS-induced NF-κB signaling by limiting TAK1 activation. | (57) |
| TRIM30α (mouse) | STING | Promotes K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of STING. | Negative regulator that attenuates STING-mediated type I IFN induction. | (58) |
| TRIM31 | MAVS | Mediates K63-linked polyubiquitination at MAVS Lys 10, 311, and 461 driving prion-like MAVS aggregation. | Positive regulator that promotes MAVS aggregation and amplifies signaling. | (59) |
| TRIM32 | STING | Induces K63-linked polyubiquitination of STING promoting TBK1 association. | Positive regulator that strengthens STING signaling. | (60) |
| TRIM38 | TRIF | Catalizes K48-linked polyubiquitination of TRIF (targets TRIF K228)leading to proteasomal degradation. | Negative regulator of TLR3/TLR4 TRIF-dependent IFN-I and inflammatory responses; limits cytokine & IFN production. | (61) |
| TRIM38 | TRAF6 | Induces K48-linked ubiquitination of TRAF6 resulting in proteasomal degradation. | Negative regulator of MyD88-dependent NF-κB activation; attenuates proinflammatory signaling. | (62) |
| TRIM38 | cGAS/STING | Mediates SUMOylation of cGAS and STING early during infection, protecting them from degradation; SUMO is removed later to terminate signaling. | Temporal positive regulator that stabilizes cGAS & STING in early infection stages and limits them later. | (63) |
| TRIM40 | NEMO | Mediates neddylation of NEMO (modification with NEDD8) that alters NEMO function. | Negative modulator of NF-κB signaling; suppresses activation via altered NEMO modification. | (64) |
| TRIM44 | MAVS | Binds MAVS & prevents its ubiquitination and degradation, stabilizing the adaptor. | Positive regulator that stabilizes MAVS and enhances antiviral signaling. | (65) |
| TRIM56 | TRIF (TLR3) | Physically interacts & forms a scaffold with TRIF; E3 activity is dispensable for TRIF complex formation. | Positive regulator that promotes TLR3 signaling and type I IFN production. | (66) |
| TRIM56 | STING | Catalyzes K63-linked polyubiquitination of STING to enhance TBK1 recruitment. | Positive regulator and amplifies STING-dependent IFN-I responses. | (67, 68) |
| TRIM65 | MDA5 (helicase domain) | Catalyzes K63-linked polyubiquitination of MDA5 (K743)promoting MDA5 oligomerization and activation. | Positive regulator which facilitates MDA5-driven antiviral IFN-I responses. | (69) |
| TRIM68 | TFG | Targets TFG for lysosomal degradation, reducing availability of adaptor proteins for IFN signaling. | Negative regulator which suppresses IFN-β production. | (70) |
TRIM proteins mediated regulatory functions in immune responses.
Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed by innate immune cells act as key sensors of molecular patterns associated with pathogens (PAMPs) derived from microbes and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) released during cellular stress or tissue damage (72). Through this detection function, PRRs initiate innate immune responses. Numerous TRIM proteins regulate innate immune signaling by modulating the activity of essential PRRs, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), and cytosolic DNA sensors (CDSs). Ligand engagement of these PRRs triggers their activation, which involves the recruitment of adaptor proteins and the initiation of downstream signaling cascades involving transcription factors such as NF-κB and IRF. These pathways lead to the production of type I IFNs, chemokines, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (73). These signaling pathways enable rapid transcriptional responses that are essential for pathogen control and coordination of adaptive immunity. TRIM proteins tune these pathways at multiple nodes. For example, TRIM25 promotes RIG-I ubiquitination through its SPRY domain-mediated substrate recognition, which mediates interaction with the RIG-I CARD domains, enabling K63-linked ubiquitination via its RING domain. This facilitates its activation and amplifies antiviral responses, thereby improving RIG-I-mediated antiviral signaling (74). In contrast, TRIM8 negatively regulates TLR3/TLR4 signaling by PRY/SPRY domain-dependent targeting with the adaptor protein TRIF. This interaction promotes RING-dependent polyubiquitination of TRIF and disrupts formation of the TRIF-TBK1 signaling complex. As a result, downstream type I interferon and inflammatory signaling are reduced (75). Beyond innate immunity, TRIM proteins also influence adaptive immunological responses by influencing T cell development and activation, along with B cell differentiation and antibody synthesis (73).
The functional scope of TRIM proteins further extends to the regulation of autophagy, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression. Structural features provide the basis for this functional diversity. The conserved RBCC core confers E3 ubiquitin ligase activity while variable C-terminal domains determine substrate specificity and pathway selection (21). SPRY domains mediate selective substrate recognition and enable TRIM proteins such as TRIM25 and TRIM21 to engage immune sensors and adaptors (74, 76). TRIM21 displays functional specialization through its C-terminal PRY/SPRY domain, which mediates high-affinity binding to the Fc region of antibodies associated with intracellular pathogens. This mode of substrate recognition enables TRIM21 to function as a cytosolic antibody receptor. It couples pathogen sensing to RING-mediated ubiquitination and the activation of innate immune signaling (76). The immunomodulatory and antiviral functions of TRIM32 are mediated through its C-terminal NHL repeat domain. This domain supports selective interactions with viral proteins and host RNA-associated factors. Such substrate recognition links RING-dependent ubiquitination to post-transcriptional regulation of immune responses and promotes antiviral restriction and immune homeostasis (22). ARF-domains possess GTPase activity and direct K27-linked ubiquitination of TBK1, as demonstrated by TRIM23, which promotes antiviral signaling (22, 76). Additionally, TRIM proteins are integral to the regulation of inflammasome activation, underscoring their essential role in maintaining immune homeostasis and coordinating responses to cellular stress (76).
Ubiquitin linkage diversity further encodes regulatory outcomes. The ability of TRIM proteins to modulate multiple signaling pathways establishes them as central regulators of immune function. They are essential in both the activation and control of inflammatory responses, as well as in maintaining immunological tolerance. K63 chains amplify signaling through scaffold formation while K48 chains terminate responses by proteasomal degradation (26, 71). TRIM38 illustrates temporal control by stabilizing cGAS STING via SUMOylation early and later promoting K48-linked degradation to resolve signaling (77). Similar context-dependence is observed for TRIM21, which functions as a cytosolic Fc receptor to activate innate signaling yet limits IFN responses through targeted degradation of IRF proteins (76). These examples establish context-dependent regulation as a defining feature of TRIM biology. Dysregulation of TRIM protein activity or ubiquitination-proteasome system has been involved in various immune-mediated conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis, emphasizing their potential as promising therapeutic targets (78).
The combination of structural complexity, ubiquitin linkage diversity, and context-dependent regulation enables TRIM proteins to act as either positive or negative regulators of immune signaling. This functional plasticity enables immune homeostasis but also represents a major challenge for therapeutic targeting because indiscriminate modulation may disrupt the balance between protective immunity and immunopathology. These aspects are further explored in subsequent sections of this review.
4 TRIM proteins in innate immune regulation
4.1 TRIM-mediated regulation of TLR pathways in immune response
The Toll-like receptor (TLR) family comprises of more than ten members, among which TLR2 and TLR4 have been most extensively investigated. Members of the TLR family are expressed by a wide range of immune cell types, including dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, B cells and other innate and adaptive immune cells. TLRs recognize extracellular and endosomal PAMPs, initiating signaling through Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing adaptor proteins (79). These receptors activate two primary adaptor-dependent signaling cascades: the myeloid differentiation gene response 88 (MyD88)-dependent pathway, utilized by all TLRs except TLR3, and the TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β (TRIF)-dependent pathway, employed by TLR3 and, through the TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM), by TLR4 (80) (Figure 3). TRIM proteins regulate both the MyD88 and TRIF-dependent signaling branches at many stages, ranging from receptor-proximal adaptor molecules to downstream kinases and transcriptional regulators. They exert TLR signaling outputs through both ubiquitin-dependent and ubiquitin-independent mechanisms, either potentiate or suppress immune activation. These signaling cascades ultimately govern the expression of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and type I interferons (IFNs). Understanding the regulatory involvement of TRIM proteins in these pathways is therefore crucial for clarifying the molecular mechanisms that link TLR signaling to trained immunity and immune homeostasis. TLR ligands have been shown to induce long-term functional reprogramming of innate immune cells through metabolic and epigenetic mechanism (81).
Figure 3
4.1.1 TRIF signaling in TLR pathways and regulation by TRIM proteins
After TLR4 is endocytosed, the adaptor protein TRAM (TICAM-2) translocates to the endosomal compartment. This aligns with the TIRAP-MyD88 complex dissociating from the plasma membrane (82). Within the endosome, TLR3 and internalized TLR4 bind the TRAM-TRIF complex, which forms a core scaffold for signal relay. TRIF works with different TNF receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) to trigger two main signaling pathways (83). In one pathway, TRIF associates with TRAF6, leading to the recruitment and activation of the TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) complex. Activated TAK1 subsequently stimulates the IκB (inhibitor of NF-κB)-kinase (IKK) complex, which comprises the NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO/IKKγ) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways (84). TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-12 are pro-inflammatory cytokines that are produced when these cascades result in the nuclear translocation of the transcription factors NF-κB and activator protein-1 (AP-1) (85). In the alternative branch, TRIF binds TRAF3, which in turn activates the IκB kinase inducible gene (IKKi) and TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1). This signaling axis promotes the phosphorylation and dimerization of interferon regulatory proteins IRF3 and IRF7, which subsequently translocate to the nucleus to initiate transcription of type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-β), essential for antiviral defense (86).
Several TRIM proteins have been identified as essential modulators of TRIF-dependent signaling. TRIM8 exhibits context-dependent regulatory function in innate signaling. Through PRY/SPRY domain-mediated interaction, this pathway is negatively regulated by disrupting the TRIF-TBK1 interaction, thus reducing IRF3 activation and limiting type I IFN production. In contrast, TRIM8 can also enhance K63-linked polyubiquitination of TAK1 and promote NF-κB activation (87). Similarly, TRIM32 functions as a negative regulator of TLR3/4 mediated signaling by enhancing the binding of TRIF to the adaptor TAX1BP1, which facilitates its selective autophagic degradation and attenuates immune responses (88). TRIM38 mediates the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of TRIF and other adaptor molecules like TRAF6 and NAP1, acting as an inducible inhibitory regulator of TLR signaling. Through K48-linked ubiquitination, TRIM38 targets these adaptors for proteasomal or lysosomal degradation, therefore downregulating the IRF3/TBK1 and NF-κB pathways, a classical feedback mechanism that prevents excessive cytokine or IFN production (61). Conversely, certain TRIMs enhance TRIF-dependent antiviral responses. TRIM56, an E3 ligase, augments TLR3-mediated IFN production by interacting with TRIF and promoting the activation of downstream signaling components (66). TRIM14, though lacking a conventional RING domain, serves as a scaffold that stabilizes nucleic acid sensors and facilitates TBK1 recruitment, thereby supporting TRIF-linked antiviral signaling in both DNA and RNA sensing contexts (89). The regulatory impact of TRIM proteins on TRIF signaling is highly context-dependent. Early positive regulators, such as TRIM56 and TRIM14 enhance type I IFN production to promote effective pathogen elimination, whereas inducible negative regulators on TRIF signaling like TRIM38 and TRIM8 act at later stages to terminate signaling and prevent immunopathology. Disruption in this context-dependent balance mechanism can lead to uncontrolled inflammation, contributing to the development of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in both experimental and clinical studies.
4.1.2 MyD88-mediated TLR pathways and regulation by TRIM proteins
The majority of TLRs, including TLR2, TLR5, TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9, activate the MyD88-dependent signaling cascade as their primary pathway. This pathway mediates the rapid induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines that are critical for early immune defense (90). The adaptor protein MyD88 is drawn to the TIR domain of TLRs upon ligand recognition at the plasma membrane, starting the formation of the Myddosome, a higher-order signaling complex. This complex consists of MyD88 and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinases (IRAK1 and IRAK4), which are subsequently activated and interact with TRAF6, a key E3 ubiquitin ligase. TRAF6 catalyzes K63-linked polyubiquitination processes that attract and activate the TAK1- TAB complex. Activated TAK1 subsequently triggers the MAPK pathways and the IκB kinase (IKK) complex, which includes IKKα, IKKβ, and NEMO (IKKγ). These signaling cascades result in the nuclear translocation of transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1, which promote the transcription of inflammatory substances, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and other chemokines essential for host defense (85, 91, 92).
Several TRIM proteins have been shown to regulate MyD88-mediated signaling, either by enhancing or restraining specific steps in the cascade. TRIM13 catalyzes K29-linked polyubiquitination of TRAF6, which positively promotes downstream signaling and NF-κB activation in TLR2-associated immunological responses (62). Conversely, TRIM38 act as a negative regulator by promoting TRAF6 to be ubiquitinated by K48, which results in its proteasomal breakdown and in turn, the suppression of NF-κB activation in macrophages (62). Similarly, TRIM32 suppresses TLR-mediated signaling through the targeted degradation of key signaling intermediates, contributing to the negative feedback control of inflammatory responses (93). These regulatory loops collectively act to fine-tune cytokine production and prevent excessive tissue-damaging inflammation. Collectively, these demonstrate that distinct TRIM proteins selectively modify the shared adaptor protein through different ubiquitin linkages, thereby exerting opposing regulatory effects on MyD88-dependent TLR signaling and NF-κB activation (see Table 1).
In contrast, certain TRIMs act as positive modulators. TRIM5 enhances MyD88-dependent signaling by generating free K63-linked polyubiquitin chains via its E3 ubiquitin ligase function. In cooperation with the E2 conjugating enzymes UEV1A and UBC13, TRIM5 scaffolds the recruitment of the TAK1 complex, resulting in the activation of TAK1 and subsequent transcription factors, including AP-1 and NF-κB (94). Similarly, TRIM8 positively promotes K63-linked polyubiquitination of TAK1, thereby amplifying NF-κB activation triggered by TNFα- and IL-1β under certain stimulatory conditions (95). Collectively, these findings illustrate that TRIM proteins serve as both activators and repressors within MyD88-dependent TLR signaling, providing a dynamic regulatory balance that ensures effective immune defense while preventing excessive autoimmunity responses.
4.2 TRIM proteins and RLR signaling pathways in immune response
The three main members of the RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) family are laboratory of genetics and physiology 2 (LGP2), retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I), and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) (96). Except for LGP2, RLRs have two N-terminal caspase recruitment domains (CARDs), a C-terminal regulatory domain (RD) and a central DExD/H-box helicase domain. RLRs identify viral RNA molecules by their unique DExD/H-box RNA helicase, thereby triggering antiviral immune responses. Upon recognition and binding of PAMPs, RIG-I and MDA5 change their conformation, exposing their CARD domains and allowing them to engage with the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS). This interaction subsequently triggers downstream activation of the NF-κB and IFN pathway of signaling (97, 98). Although LGP2 lacks CARD domains necessary for direct signaling, it is a positive regulator of antiviral responses mediated by RIG-I and MDA5. LPG2 enhances the sensitivity of RIG-I and MDA5 to viral infection by facilitating viral RNA recognition through its ATPase domain. Both RIG-I and MDA5 are extremely regulated by post-translational changes, ensuring their rapid activation upon viral detection while preventing excessive immune responses (99, 100).
Recent studies have established that TRIM proteins are essential in modulating RLR-dependent antiviral signaling. TRIM25, one of the most well-characterized E3 ubiquitin ligases in this context, promotes RIG-I oligomerization and its interaction with MAVS, leading to efficient downstream signal transduction (50). The ubiquitin-specific peptidase 15 (USP15) enhances TRIM25 stability by inhibiting its K48-associated ubiquitination, thus positively modulating the TRIM25-RIG-I signaling axis (51). Structural analyses of TRIM25 have identified a potential binding pocket within its SPRY domain that mediates interaction with RIG-I. This discovery suggests that small-molecule compounds targeting this domain could serve as therapeutic agents to inhibit aberrant RIG-I activation in autoimmune or hypersensitivity disorders (101).
Other TRIM proteins also contribute to the regulation of RLR signaling. TRIM35 acts as a positive regulator by catalyzing K63-dependent polyubiquitination of TRAF3, which leads to the formation of the TRAF3-MAVS-TBK1 signaling complex and facilitates activation of IRF3/7 (102). Similarly, TRIM14, a mitochondria-associated adaptor, recruits the IKKγ/NEMO adaptor to MAVS, thereby enhancing RIG-I-dependent activation of IRF3 and NF-κB pathways (36). In addition, several other TRIM family members, including TRIM4 (27), TRIM65 (69), TRIM31 (59), TRIM13 (103), and TRIM44 (65), have been reported to regulate RLR signaling through direct ubiquitination of RLRs or MAVS. Depending on the cellular context and target lysine residues, these TRIMs can catalyze activating (K63-linked) or inhibitory (K48-linked) ubiquitin chains. Some also control MAVS turnover or aggregate clearance, influencing the duration and magnitude of interferon responses (see Table 1). Dysregulated TRIM-RLR interactions can modify host susceptibility to RNA viruses and lead to chronic interferonopathies when negative feedback mechanisms fail. Given that RLR signaling is central to antiviral defense, TRIM proteins that potentiate this pathway represent promising candidates for antiviral enhancement, whereas those that suppress it may serve as potential therapeutic targets in interferon-mediated autoimmune diseases.
4.3 TRIM proteins in the cGAS-STING pathway in immune response
Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), an enzyme that is triggered by double-stranded DNA and acts as a pattern recognition receptor for aberrant or pathogen-derived DNA in the cytoplasm, is the main detector of cytosolic DNA (104). A conformational shift in cGAS upon attachment to double-stranded DNA catalyzes the synthesis of cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), a secondary messenger. cGAMP subsequently interacts with the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, triggering STING oligomerization and its translocation to the Golgi apparatus. Activated STING provides a platform for the recruitment of kinases TBK1 and IKKi, which phosphorylate the interferon regulatory factors IRF3 and IRF7. Phosphorylated IRF3/7 dimerize and translocate to the nucleus, initiating transcription of IFN-α/β and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), thereby establishing an antiviral state. In parallel, STING activation induces NF-κB-dependent transcription, promoting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and coordinating a comprehensive innate immune response (105, 106).
TRIM family proteins serve as critical modulators of the cGAS–STING pathway, providing either positive or negative regulation to maintain immune balance. TRIM56 enhances cGAS activity through monoubiquitination, increasing cGAMP production and promoting downstream STING activation. Both TRIM56 and TRIM32 have been reported to promote K63-linked polyubiquitination of STING in response to cytosolic DNA stimulation, facilitating antiviral signaling. However, more recent studies suggest that instead of directly ubiquitinating STING, these TRIMs may generate unanchored polyubiquitin chains that activate NEMO, which, in cooperation with IKKβ and TBK1, drives IRF3 and NF-κB activation (60, 67, 68). Conversely, TRIM30α (58) and TRIM29 (56) mediate K48-dependent ubiquitination of STING, leading to its proteasomal destruction. The negative regulation of STING-dependent signaling in macrophages and DCs during herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection attenuates the antiviral response. TRIM14 stabilizes cGAS by preventing its K48-linked polyubiquitination and recruiting deubiquitinases such as USP14, thereby sustaining type I IFN signaling and enhancing antiviral innate immunity (37). Similarly, TRIM38 also displays context-dependent regulatory role and negatively regulates TLR and RIG-I-like receptor pathways (61). Under basal conditions, TRIM38 stabilizes these signaling by promoting SUMOylation of cGAS, protecting it from ubiquitination and degradation, which preserves both cGAS and STING function (63) (Table 1). TRIM proteins act as crucial checkpoints in the cGAS-STING pathway. Their dual regulatory roles underscore their significance in innate immune homeostasis and highlight their potential as therapeutic targets in immune-mediated diseases.
These highlight context-dependent regulation as a fundamental property of TRIM proteins. Table 1 also summarizes and highlights the TRIMs context-dependent regulatory role in the immune system. Individual TRIMs can function as signal amplifiers or terminators depending on the receptor engaged, ubiquitin linkage type, cellular compartment and stage of immune activation. This duality enables fine-tuned immune control but also represents a major challenge for therapeutic targeting, as indiscriminate inhibition or activation may disrupt immune homeostasis.
5 TRIM proteins in adaptive immunity
5.1 TRIM proteins in T-cell activation
Although TRIM proteins are extensively characterized for their roles in innate immune regulation, they also exert critical and multifaceted functions in adaptive immunity, particularly in the activation of T-cells, their differentiation, and maintaining the state of tolerance. Through ubiquitination-dependent mechanisms, TRIMs regulate essential signaling intermediates, transcriptional regulators, and receptor complexes, establishing a balanced immune activation while preventing autoimmunity. Compared with innate immunity, mechanistic studies of TRIM proteins in adaptive immune cells remain limited, and most available evidence is derived from a small number of well-characterized TRIM family members.
Several TRIM family members act as E3 ubiquitin ligases that conjugate distinct ubiquitin chain linkages. K63-linked chains promote signaling complex formation and K48-linked chains mediate proteasomal degradation at early steps of T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Certain TRIMs stabilize TCR complexes by interacting with the TCR ζ-chain, enhancing receptor surface expression and calcium mobilization, thereby enhancing T-cell activation (107). Upon TCR engagement, kinases such as Lck (Src-family) and ZAP-70 (Syk-family) are activated, triggering downstream pathways including PI3K–Akt, MAPK, NF-κB, and AP-1, which collectively promote IL-2 transcription, T-cell proliferation, and survival (107–109). TRIM proteins also play key roles in T-cell lineage differentiation, influencing the balance between effector subsets such as Th2 cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Certain TRIMs promote Th2 differentiation associated with allergic inflammation, whereas others negatively regulate Th2-driven immune responses (110). Conversely, specific TRIMs can suppress Treg differentiation in CD4+ T cells, thereby predisposing to autoimmune disease development (111). Beyond activation and differentiation, TRIMs modulate peripheral T-cell tolerance by regulating activation thresholds, managing effector functions, and preventing intense proliferation (112).
TRIM27 acts as a negative modulator of TCR signaling by mediating ubiquitin-dependent degradation of proximal signaling molecules and limiting PI3K/Ca²+ flux, thereby suppressing CD4+ T-cell proliferation and cytokine release (113). TRIM21 (also known as Ro52) is a well-studied TRIM that is involved in innate as well as adaptive immunity, and functions as a modulator of the IL-23/Th17 axis negatively (114). TRIM21 has a role in T-cell activation since the overexpression of TRIM21 in Jurkat cells increases IL-2 synthesis after CD28 stimulation, while TRIM21 knockdown in Jurkat cells show decreased IL-2 induction (115). TRIM21 deficiency in mice results in excessive proliferation of T-cells and increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-17, summarizing features of systemic lupus erythematosus through the IL-23-Th17 pathways (116). Mechanistically, TRIM21 may influence the IRF4/IRF5 axis, thereby promoting differentiation of antibody-secreting plasma cells (117).
TRIM30α negatively regulates T-cell signaling by promoting lysosomal degradation of TAK1-binding protein 2 (TAB2) and TAB3, leading to inhibition of the TAK1–NF-κB axis and reduced T-cell activation (57). In mice, TRIM30 deficiency alters CD4/CD8 T-cell ratios, enhances T-cell proliferation in some settings, but can diminish IL-2 production by downstream NF-κB, suggesting a context-dependent role in maintaining homeostatic activation thresholds (118). In contrast, TRIM28 functions as a positive modulator of CD8+ T-cell activation through epigenetic mechanisms. It orchestrates chromatin remodeling and three-dimensional chromatin looping at crucial activation-associated genes, such as Ifng, Gzmb, Tbx21, and IL2, thereby promoting transcriptional activation during cytotoxic responses (119). TRIM28 also regulates T helper 17 (Th17) and Treg differentiation, influencing the balance between immune tolerance and autoimmunity (120). In human T cells, TRIM28 interacts with Foxp3 through the TRIM28–FIK–Foxp3 complex, which is essential for the suppressive function of Tregs. Disruption of this complex revokes Treg suppressive capacity and leads to dysregulated Foxp3 target gene expression, a mechanism implicated in autoimmune pathogenesis (121).
In signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) signaling, TRIM24 acts as a negative regulator. It interacts with nuclear receptors, including retinoic acid and estrogen receptors, along with chromatin-associated factors, thereby inhibiting STAT1-mediated transcriptional activity (122). TRIM24 expression is elevated in Th2 cells, where it contributes to allergic asthma pathogenesis by dampening IL-1-induced gene expression and mitigating IL-1β-driven bronchial inflammation (123). Furthermore, TRIM32 deficiency enhances Th2 cell differentiation and cytokine production, exacerbating atopic dermatitis, suggesting that TRIM32 functions as a negative regulator of Th2-mediated allergic responses (124).
5.2 TRIM proteins and B-cell function
TRIM proteins function predominantly as E3 ubiquitin ligases or scaffold adaptors, modulating B-cell responses at multiple levels. They influence B-cell receptor (BCR) and TLR signaling intermediates through K63 or K48-linked ubiquitination, either enhancing or terminating downstream signaling. Additionally, TRIMs recruit deubiquitinases or autophagy receptors to stabilize or remove signaling complexes and regulate chromatin accessibility and transcription factor activity, establishing long-term functional programs in B cells (73). Through these mechanisms, TRIM proteins exert broad control over adaptive immunity, modification B-cell activation, antigen processing, nucleic acid sensing, and transcriptional programs that dictate activation thresholds, class-switch recombination, and immune tolerance. Beyond direct B-cell effects, TRIMs also modulate T-cell functions and differentiation, contributing to the overall regulation of immune homeostasis, as discussed in the previous section.
Abnormal B-cell differentiation or apoptosis can lead to autoimmune disorders. For example, in a recent study, Trim21 deletion enhances B-cell proliferation and production of antibodies, primarily due to defects in B-cell rather than effects caused by T cells or DCs. TRIM21 is also a known autoantigen that binds anti-SS-A antibodies, commonly identified in the sera of individuals with autoimmune disorders (46, 117). TRIM proteins further regulate B-cell function via the noncanonical NF-κB pathway. TRIM55 mediates the ubiquitination of p100, facilitating its processing into the transcription factor p52. In mice with B-cell specific loss of Trim55, germinal center development and antibody synthesis were markedly reduced, suggesting TRIM55 is a possible therapeutic target in autoimmune disorders (125).
TRIM33 is another key regulator that governs the homeostasis and function of multiple immune cell types, including DCs, which serve as sentinels of the immune system (126). It is found in Trim33fl/fl Cre-ERT2 mice that TRIM33 deletion impaired DCs differentiation from hematopoietic progenitors across developmental stages. This deficiency also downregulated essential genes such as Irf8 and Bcl2l11 for DCs differentiation, maintenance and survival. TRIM33 thereby highlights its role as a critical regulator of both innate and adaptive immunity (127). Available evidence from mechanistic studies in adaptive immunity is limited but indicates that TRIM proteins regulate B-cell biology, shape humoral immunity, maintain immune tolerance, and influence autoimmune disease susceptibility.
6 TRIM dysregulation in autoimmune and immune-related disorders
6.1 Systemic lupus erythematosus
A classic autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by the generation of autoantibodies, dysregulated type I IFN signaling, and multi-organ involvement. A hallmark of SLE is the presence of elevated autoantibodies against TRIM21 (Ro52), which can impair its E3 ligase activity. Another characteristic is the disruption of the negative mediation of type I IFN signaling, and alters the differentiation of B-cell. This contributes to a self-amplifying inflammatory loop that exacerbates disease activity (128). TRIM21 mediates ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of critical substrates, including STING, thereby restricting type I IFN production. In Trim21 deficient mice, lupus-like pathology emerges, characterized by expansion of Th17 cells and elevated anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (129).
Furthermore, TRIM5 has been associated with SLE pathogenesis. In peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from individuals with SLE, it is strongly expressed and correlates with the expression of antiviral genes. Elevated TRIM5 levels are associated with reduced naive CD4+ T cells and an increased proportion of M2 macrophages, which modulate immune responses in SLE. TRIM5 can inadvertently activate innate pathways of NF-κB and type I IFN production, thereby amplifying inflammatory responses and contributing to disease progression (130). Inhibition of IFN has become a new treatment for SLE patients and these observations position TRIM21 and TRIM5 as potential therapeutic targets to restore immune homeostasis and limit tissue damage in SLE.
6.2 Sjögren’s syndrome
Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) is an autoimmune disease that mostly affects exocrine glands, especially the salivary and lacrimal glands. It causes lymphocytic infiltration and glandular dysfunction. TRIM21/Ro52 and corresponding autoantibodies (anti-TRIM21/Ro52) are well-recognized autoantigens in SS and other autoimmune diseases, including SLE (131). Detection of anti-TRIM21 antibodies is a key diagnostic marker for SS.
Under physiological conditions, TRIM21 inhibits type I IFN signaling by ubiquitin-mediated degradation of IRF3/5. In SS patients, PBMC analyses reveal elevated TRIM21 transcript levels, coupled with persistently high IRF3 and IRF5 protein expression. TRIM21/Ro52 transcription is upregulated by IRF1/2 and suppressed by IRF4/8, consistent with its overexpression in SS. Autoantibodies against TRIM21 impair its ability to degrade IRFs, resulting in dysregulated IFN production and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, subsequently high TRIM21/Ro52 expression (132, 133). In vitro studies demonstrate that anti-TRIM21 antibodies can sterically hinder the interaction between TRIM21 and its E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, hence preventing normal autoubiquitination and degradation of substrates (128). This dysregulation amplifies autoimmunity in SS and highlights it as a potential therapeutic target by either restoring TRIM21 function or alleviating the effects of anti-TRIM21 antibodies.
6.3 Inflammatory bowel disease and Crohn’s disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is defined by chronic relapsing intestinal inflammation, impaired epithelial barrier function, dysregulated immune responses, and genetic predisposition. TRIM proteins contribute to both susceptibility and progression of IBD through their modulation of immunological signaling and maintenance of gut homeostasis.
One prominent TRIM member associated with the susceptibility of IBD is TRIM20, which is encoded by the MEFV gene (134). TRIM21 suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokines in the gut and inhibits differentiation of CD4+ T cells into Th1 and Th17 inflammatory subsets (135). TRIM22 has been identified as a signaling modulator of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2), essential for microbial recognition and inflammatory responses. Variants in the SPRY domain of TRIM22 impair its K63-linked ubiquitination of NOD2, consequently weakening NOD2-dependent muramyl dipeptide (MDP) signaling and promoting Crohn’s disease-associated inflammation (136).
TRIM27 increases gut inflammation by promoting the STAT3 and JAK1 interaction, leading to the activation of STAT3 and the amplification of pro-inflammatory signaling in the colon. Knockout studies in mice demonstrate resistance to dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis, supporting the pro-inflammatory role of TRIM27 protein (137). TRIM27 also stabilizes β-catenin, thereby activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling to promote the self-renewal of intestinal stem cells. Knockout of Trim27 impairs organoid formation, a process that can be restored by reintroducing either TRIM27 or β-catenin. This underscores the therapeutic potential of addressing the TRIM27/Wnt/β-catenin pathway in IBD (138). TRIM31 regulates intestinal inflammation by promoting ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of NLRP3, a critical component of the inflammasome that facilitates IL-1β secretion. By attenuating inflammasome activity, TRIM31 protects against excessive intestinal inflammation (139). Dysregulated TRIM activity in the gut compromises barrier integrity, alters T-cell differentiation, and disrupts the balance between pro-inflammatory and regulatory T-cell subsets, which further drives the inflammatory cascade associated with IBD.
6.4 Familial mediterranean fever
Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autoinflammatory condition marked by repeated episodes of fever, serositis, and systemic inflammation. This disorder is primarily caused by changes in the MEFV gene, which makes the TRIM20 (pyrin). These mutations disrupt TRIM20-mediated ubiquitination and the regulated degradation of inflammatory mediators, resulting in persistent activation of inflammatory-related pathways and increased release of IL-1β, a central hallmark of FMF pathogenesis (140). The sustained IL-1β signaling drives systemic inflammatory responses and, in some cases, contributes to intestinal inflammation resembling IBD.
6.5 Psoriasis
Psoriasis is a persistent inflammatory dermatological condition marked by keratinocyte proliferation, aberrant immune activation, and the formation of scaly skin plaques. Multiple TRIM proteins play essential roles in modulating inflammatory responses within keratinocytes.
Increased expression of TRIM21 has been noted in psoriatic epidermal cells, and its suppression in human keratinocytes significantly reduces the synthesis of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (141). The E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2L3 regulates TRIM21 activity, and its overexpression decreases STAT3 pathway activation and IL-1β levels. In a mouse model of psoriasis induced by imiquimod (IMQ), reduced UBE2L3 expression was associated with caspase-1 activation in the epidermis. Overexpression of UBE2L3, in turn improved psoriasis-like lesions and reduced levels of both pro-IL-1β and mature IL-1β (142). Similarly, silencing of TRIM21 decreased the release of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in cells stimulated by LPS (143). Furthermore, TRIM33 is markedly upregulated in psoriatic lesions and acts as a positive modulator of inflammation in keratinocytes. TRIM33 promotes the ubiquitination of Annexin A2 (Anxa2), hence promoting its interaction with NF-κB subunits p50 and p65, which enhances transcription of downstream pro-inflammatory genes such as IL-6, IL-1β, and NLRP3 (144). The elevated epidermal expression of TRIM33 in psoriasis underscores its contribution to disease pathology, emphasizing the therapeutic potential of targeting TRIM-mediated signaling pathways to mitigate psoriatic inflammation.
6.6 Type 1 diabetes
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder in which the immune system destroys pancreatic β-cells. Both genetic and functional evidence suggest that TRIM27 mutations correlate with increased susceptibility to T1D. TRIM27 exerts a protective role in pancreatic tissue by suppressing TNF-α-induced β-cell death. In Trim27-deficient mice, exposure to streptozotocin (STZ) induces severe diabetes, reflecting enhanced β-cell apoptosis. Mechanistically, TRIM27 regulates the deubiquitination of receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1), preventing caspase-3 activation and β-cell apoptosis (Table 2). Loss of TRIM27 leads to decreased β-cell mass and an increase of cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-1β (153). TRIM72 is known as Mitsugumin 53 (MG53), functions as an E3 ligase that modulates insulin signaling and membrane repair in β-cells. Dysregulation of TRIM72 leads to insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction through ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), thereby disrupting glucose and lipid metabolism (154, 155). Further functions of the TRIM72 protein in insulin signaling and its potential as a therapeutic target in human insulin resistance and type 1 diabetes require more research.
Table 2
| Autoimmune disease | TRIM proteins | Mechanistic evidence |
|---|---|---|
| SLE | TRIM21(Ro52), TRIM5, TRIM68 | TRIM21 autoantigen; regulates IFN pathway and T-cell activation (39, 128). TRIM5 & TRIM68 linked via expression and autoantibody reactivity (130, 145). |
| SS | TRIM21(Ro52), TRIM68 | TRIM21 is a clinical autoantigen, associated with disease severity (128, 131). TRIM68 identified as autoantigen (145). |
| RA | TRIM38, TRIM3, TRIM72, TRIM33 | TRIM38 regulates TRAF6/NF-κB signaling (146). TRIM3 & TRIM72 participate in synoviocyte function (147, 148). TRIM33 affects inflammation and autoantibody responses (149). |
| MS | TRIM21, TRIM30α, TRIM32 | TRIM21 & TRIM32 involved in neuroprotection and anti-inflammatory responses (150, 151). TRIM30α modulates TLR/NF-κB signaling (103). |
| Psoriasis | TRIM21, TRIM33 | TRIM21 associations with skin autoantibodies and inflammation (142, 143). TRIM33 enhances keratinocyte inflammation (144). |
| IBD/CD | TRIM22, TRIM21, TRIM28 | TRIM22 regulates NOD2 signaling (136). TRIM21 influences Th1/Th17 cell differentiation (135).TRIM28 mediates epigenetic regulation (152). |
| FMF | TRIM20 (MEFV/Pyrin), | TRIM20 (Pyrin) is the classical gene, regulating inflammasome and IL-1 signaling by interacting with NALP3 and caspase-1 (140). |
| T1D | TRIM27, TRIM72 | TRIM27 gene variants associated with β-cell immunity (153). TRIM72 mediates IRS‐1 degradation and inhibit the constrain signaling (154, 155). |
Reported mechanistic evidence for TRIM proteins in autoimmune diseases.
6.7 Multiple sclerosis
It is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by demyelination, neuroinflammation, and persistent neurological impairment (156). In an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model, TRIM21 was found to interact with pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), facilitating its nuclear translocation and promoting phosphorylation of STAT3 and NF-κB, as well as interaction with c-Myc. This process enhances astrocyte glycolysis and proliferation, contributing to neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) (150). Targeting the TRIM2-PKM2 axis may provide a promising therapeutic approach for MS. Additionally, mutations in TRIM32 have been associated with neuronal damage and demyelination, as reported in a clinical case by Marchuk et al. (2021) (151). Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of MS by triggering immune and inflammatory responses and disrupting neuronal signaling (157, 158). TRIM proteins such as TRIM5α and TRIM22 regulate antiviral immunity by recognizing retroviral capsids and shaping immune responses to HERVs. Aberrant activation of these pathways can lead to sustained type I IFN and NF-κB signaling and promote the activation of autoreactive T and B cells. This process linking antiviral immune dysregulation drives loss of self-tolerance and contributes to demyelination and neurodegeneration. Aberrant regulation of these TRIM proteins may contribute to immune activation and disease progression in MS (158).
6.8 Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that primarily affects synovial joints, leading to persistent inflammation, synovial hyperplasia, and cartilage destruction. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of RA by promoting the production of TNF-α and IL-1β, thereby propagating inflammation (159).
The TRIM38-NLRP6 axis (nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 6) has been found to negatively affect the canonical NF-κB pathway in RA-FLS through an inflammasome-independent mechanism. TRIM38 interacts with NLRP6 and TAB2/3, inducing their lysosome-dependent degradation. This inhibits NF-κB activation and decreases cytokine production in FLS (146). A recent study has also linked ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of programmed cell death driven by lipid peroxidation, to the pathogenesis of RA. Inducing ferroptosis in RA-FLS can alleviate disease progression (160).TRIM16 expression is downregulated in RA, while its overexpression suppresses disease severity in mouse models. TRIM16 promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of the transcription factor Snail family zinc finger 1 (Snai1), which normally inhibits ferroptosis. The TRIM16-Snai1 axis enhances ferroptosis and exerts anti-inflammatory effects by counteracting TNF-α, identifying a novel immunoregulatory mechanism and therapeutic target to control prognosis in RA (161).
Additionally, TRIM3 has been shown to suppress FLS proliferation and reduce inflammatory cytokine secretion via the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Low TRIM3 expression is observed in RA synovial tissue relative to healthy controls, while its overexpression increases p53 and p21expression, leading to cell cycle arrest and decreased production of TNF-α and IL-6 (147). TRIM33 is also downregulated in RA synovial fibroblasts (RASFs). KLF9 is a transcription factor related to proliferation, apoptosis and is widely involved in B and T-cell differentiation. The transcription factor KLF9 positively modulates the expression of TRIM33, which in turn suppresses TNF-α-induced proliferation of RASF and the release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8. Activation of the KLF9-TRIM33 axis thus restrains abnormal fibroblast proliferation and inflammatory responses, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target that can intervene and reverse RA progression (149).
7 Considerable strategies for TRIM proteins as therapeutic targets
The therapeutic targeting of TRIM proteins involves several interconnected strategies. A detailed understanding of both the molecular structure and functional dynamics of TRIM proteins has enabled the development of innovative approaches to modulate their activity.
7.1 Pharmacological modulation strategies
TRIM proteins contain diverse functional domains that enable them to regulate multiple cellular processes, with the RING domain serving as a key determinant of E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Although ubiquitination represents a central mechanism of action, several TRIM family members also exert ubiquitin-independent functions (15). Effective therapeutic targeting cannot rely solely on direct inhibition of catalytic activity. Instead, successful modulation of TRIM proteins requires a detailed understanding of their multi-domain architecture and adapter-like properties to achieve selective and context-appropriate intervention. These features highlight the need for alternative therapeutic strategies that extend beyond catalytic inhibition, including targeted protein degradation and domain-selective modulation.
Therapeutic modulation of TRIM proteins can be broadly divided into direct and indirect approaches. Direct strategies aim to alter the catalytic or scaffolding functions of TRIM by targeting its RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase domain or substrate-binding (PRY/SPRY) domains (162, 163). The shallow and extended protein-protein interaction (PPI) interfaces of TRIMs complicate conventional small-molecule inhibition. Recent structure-guided designs and fragment-based screening methods have begun to identify druggable allosteric sites. Complementary indirect strategies exploit the broader ubiquitin-proteasome and deubiquitinase networks that regulate TRIM turnover or substrate fate. Inhibitors of deubiquitinases and E2-E3 interface modulators can fine-tune TRIM activity without directly blocking the ligase function (Figure 4) (164, 165).
Figure 4
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) and molecular glues (MGs) are being developed to selectively degrade or stabilize pathogenic TRIM variants. These approaches offer a precision strategy for autoimmune and interferon-driven diseases (166–168). Parallel research efforts also focus on targeting downstream pathways influenced by TRIM proteins, such as cGAS-STING, NF-κB, or TBK1-IRF3. Small-molecule agonists or antagonists may restore balance in dysregulated immune signaling (169, 170). Although no therapeutic drugs currently exist that directly target TRIM proteins at the experimental or clinical stage, their extensive involvement in immunological regulation makes them promising candidates for future drug development. These emerging pharmacological frameworks enable pathway-specific modulation of immune responses and position TRIM proteins as tractable nodes within the ubiquitin landscape, despite historical challenges in targeting E3 ligases.
7.2 TRIM-based biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis
TRIM proteins are increasingly recognized as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers across autoimmune-related diseases. Among them, anti-Ro52/TRIM21 autoantibodies are well-established serological markers in systemic autoimmune disorders such as SLE and Sjögren’s syndrome. Their expression levels are correlated with disease severity, IFN signatures, and distinct clinical phenotypes (171, 172). The structural domains of TRIM proteins, such as the C-terminal substrate-binding domains (PRY/SPRY, PHD-BRD, NHL), are essential for their molecular interactions or functions and may be exploited for diagnostic targeting (166, 173, 174).
Beyond autoantibodies, altered transcriptional and protein expression of several TRIMs, including TRIM19, TRIM21, TRIM24, TRIM28, and TRIM33, has been associated with disease progression, treatment response, and oncogenic transformation. This demonstrates their effectiveness as molecular classifiers and outcome predictors. The integration of quantitative TRIMs expression assays with high-throughput genomic and proteomic platforms facilitates patient stratification based on immune activation states or TRIMs pathway activity, aiding personalized therapeutic decisions (175–177). Despite their potential, the clinical translation of TRIM proteins as biomarkers remains in its early stages. Large multicenter validation studies are still required to confirm their diagnostic and prognostic significance and to establish standardized assay thresholds for routine clinical use.
7.3 Gene therapy, small molecules, and targeted degradation
Recent advancements in gene and protein-level modulation technologies have opened new therapeutic avenues for targeting TRIM proteins. Gene therapy approaches such as RNA interference (RNAi), antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), and CRISPR-based regulation offer the potential to silence pathogenic TRIM isoforms or restore deficient TRIM expression in a cell type-specific manner, thereby reestablishing immune homeostasis. In parallel, strategically designed small molecules that modulate TRIM E3 ligase or substrate-binding activities are being complemented by breakthroughs in targeted protein degradation technologies, particularly PROTACs and MGs (178–181). These strategies utilize the cellular ubiquitin system to selectively degrade aberrant TRIMs or their downstream effectors. Proof-of-concept studies, such as TRIM24-directed PROTACs, have shown tumor suppression in preclinical cancer models, validating the feasibility of pharmacologically manipulating TRIM protein stability (182). PROTAC technologies can be designed to engage different E3 ligases, enabling the selective degradation of disease-associated or “undruggable” proteins (183, 184). The integration of gene editing, chemical biology, and proteomics-guided screening is producing a comprehensive therapeutic toolkit for modulating TRIM protein activity in immune-related diseases. Delivery specificity and off-target effects continue to pose substantial translational challenges.
7.4 Challenges and translational barriers
A major translational barrier in targeting TRIM proteins is their high structural conservation, particularly within the RING domain, which complicates selective inhibition and increases the risk of off-target effects across the TRIM family. Many TRIMs share identical catalytic architectures, making it difficult to achieve specificity using conventional small-molecule inhibitors. In addition, TRIM proteins often exhibit stimulus and cell-type-specific dual functions, acting as either pro-positive or anti-negative regulators of immune signaling. This context-dependent functional plasticity raises the risk that indiscriminate inhibition may disrupt immune homeostasis and exacerbate disease.
Despite encouraging progress, various challenges persist in obstructing the translation of TRIM-targeted therapeutics. Many TRIM proteins do not possess clearly defined ligandable sites, and their complex protein-protein interaction interfaces complicate pharmacological targeting. Their opposing functions in distinct cellular contexts further complicate therapeutic intervention, as targeting a TRIM protein may yield opposing outcomes depending on disease stage, tissue, or immune context. Emerging strategies such as PROTACs and MGs offer opportunities to overcome these challenges by enabling domain-specific targeting and conditional degradation of pathogenic TRIM activities while preserving physiological functions.In this context, PROTAC-based strategies may offer a route to enhanced selectivity by exploiting tissue-based E3 ligase recruiters, engaging TRIM-specific ligandable features outside the highly conserved RING domain, and limiting systemic exposure through localized or targeted delivery approaches such as nanoparticle formulations.
Specificity and safety remain major concerns, as systemic modulation of ubiquitin signaling could interfere with proteostasis and trigger unintended immune responses. Pharmacokinetic and delivery issues, including the stability and bioavailability of PROTACs or small-molecule inhibitors, also present key challenges for in vivo applications. Furthermore, species-specific differences in TRIM repertoires and incomplete validation of long-term safety hinder the extrapolation of preclinical findings to humans (22, 185, 186). The lack of selective chemical probes, ligand maps, and validated E3 ligase recruiters further limits experimental precision.
Robust biomarker qualification and patient stratification frameworks are essential for identifying individuals who may benefit from TRIM protein activation versus inhibition strategies. Addressing these gaps through integrated efforts in structural biology, probe development, and translational immunology will be essential to fully realize the therapeutic potential of TRIM proteins in autoimmune and immune-mediated disorders.
8 Conclusions
This review summarizes multiple studies highlighting the diverse roles of TRIM family proteins in various immunological disorders, presenting potential pathways for targeted therapies and improving the management of autoimmune diseases associated with TRIM protein dysregulation. The emergence and progression of immune responses are closely entangled with the multifaceted functions of TRIM proteins, which act as key regulatory molecules in both innate and adaptive immunity (Table 2) (6, 7, 13). These proteins influence the activity of PRR signaling pathways, modulate the expression of downstream cytokines, and orchestrate complex immune networks that determine the magnitude and nature of immune activation. Importantly, TRIM-mediated regulation of PRR signaling is stimulus-dependent and cell type-specific, underscoring their dynamic and context-dependent roles in immune modulation (26, 71, 109). Many TRIM proteins act cooperatively or in a coordinated manner to regulate immune homeostasis, highlighting their dual potential to either activate or suppress immune responses. This balance is essential for preventing excessive inflammation and maintaining tolerance, thereby reducing the risk of autoimmune pathology.
Despite growing evidence of their immunoregulatory importance, the rational design of TRIM-targeted inhibitors or modulators remains in its beginnings. Approximately one-third of TRIM genes generate alternatively spliced transcripts that encode variants lacking conserved domains. This complexity has limited the functional roles of individual TRIM isoforms and remains poorly explored for most TRIM family members. TRIM19 has seven reported isoforms that display distinct functions. Among these, only TRIM19 isoform 4 enhances IRF3 stability and signaling by promoting proteasomal degradation of the negative regulator PIN1 (13, 38).The lack of detailed structural and functional characterization, combined with the absence of known active compounds and the inherent multidomain, multifunctional nature of TRIM proteins, presents significant challenges for drug discovery. The review also outlined emerging therapeutic strategies for targeting TRIM proteins, emphasizing their potential as novel molecular nodes for precision immunomodulation. However, species-specific variations continue to complicate preclinical validation and translational extrapolation to human systems. Moving forward, comprehensive investigations are required to deepen our understanding of TRIM biology and identify efficient, isoform-specific targeting strategies. Future research should define isoform-dependent mechanisms, interaction networks, and post-translational modifications that govern the functions of TRIM proteins across distinct immune cell subsets. Advancements in structural biology, proteomics, and single-cell transcriptomics will be instrumental in uncovering actionable molecular targets and guiding the development of next-generation therapies. Such progress will not only enhance our understanding of TRIM-mediated immune regulation but also pave the way for precision therapeutic interventions in autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases.
Statements
Author contributions
BJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. RK: Writing – review & editing. SZ: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. FG: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. JEE: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. AI: Validation, Writing – review & editing. SM: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Funding acquisition, Supervision. MB: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Validation. ET: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by grants from the G. d’Annunzio University, Chieti (ex. 60% from Ateneo G. d’Annunzio) and from the Miulli general Hospital [Organoid Project (PNRR contributions)].
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this work, the authors used Generative AI and AI-assisted tools solely to improve the language, grammar, and readability of the manuscript. No AI tools were used for generating substantive content, data analysis, interpretation of results, or drawing scientific conclusions. All intellectual contributions, study design, data collection, analysis, and final interpretations were conceived and executed by the authors. The authors reviewed and verified the accuracy and appropriateness of all AI-assisted edits and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
HayashiTNakamuraTTakaokaA. Pattern recognition receptors. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi. (2011) 34:329–45. doi: 10.2177/jsci.34.329
2
KawaiTAkiraS. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:373–84. doi: 10.1038/ni.1863
3
ThompsonMRKaminskiJJKurt-JonesEAFitzgeraldKA. Pattern recognition receptors and the innate immune response to viral infection. Viruses. (2011) 3:920. doi: 10.3390/v3060920
4
ZhaoQWangQWangTXuJLiTLiuQet al. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) in macrophages possess prognosis and immunotherapy potential for melanoma. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:765615. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.765615
5
ZhuGXuYCenXNandakumarKSLiuSChengK. Targeting pattern-recognition receptors to discover new small molecule immune modulators. Eur J Med Chem. (2018) 144:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.12.026
6
BarreraMJAguileraSCastroICarvajalPJaraDMolinaCet al. Dysfunctional mitochondria as critical players in the inflammation of autoimmune diseases: Potential role in Sjögren’s syndrome. Autoimmun Rev. (2021) 20:102867. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102867
7
ChenLCaoSQLinZMHeSJZuoJP. NOD-like receptors in autoimmune diseases. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2021) 42:1742–56. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-00603-2
8
DeerhakeMEBiswasDDBarclayWEShinoharaML. Pattern recognition receptors in multiple sclerosis and its animal models. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2644. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02644
9
McKernanDP. Pattern recognition receptors as potential drug targets in inflammatory disorders. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. (2020) 119:65–109. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.09.001
10
XuZKombe KombeAJDengSZhangHWuSRuanJet al. NLRP inflammasomes in health and disease. Mol Biomed. (2024) 5:14. doi: 10.1186/s43556-024-00179-x
11
SayyadZAcharyaDGackMU. TRIM proteins: key regulators of immunity to herpesvirus infection. Viruses. (2024) 16:1738. doi: 10.3390/v16111738
12
WirthMSchickMKellerUKrönkeJ. Ubiquitination and ubiquitin-like modifications in multiple myeloma: biology and therapy. Cancers. (2020) 12:3764. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123764
13
VersteegGABenkeSGarcía-SastreARajsbaumR. InTRIMsic immunity: Positive and negative regulation of immune signaling by tripartite motif proteins. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2014) 25:563–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.08.001
14
GiraldoMIHageAvan TolSRajsbaumR. TRIM proteins in host defense and viral pathogenesis. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. (2020) 7:101–14. doi: 10.1007/s40588-020-00150-8
15
VunjakMVersteegGA. TRIM proteins. Curr Biol. (2019) 29:R42–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.026
16
YuCRaoDWangTSongJZhangLHuangW. Emerging roles of TRIM27 in cancer and other human diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2022) 10:1004429. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1004429
17
WangLNingS. TRIMming type I interferon-mediated innate immune response in antiviral and antitumor defense. Viruses. (2021) 13:279. doi: 10.3390/v13020279
18
O’BrienBAArcherNSSimpsonAMTorpyFRNassifNT. Association of SLC11A1 promoter polymorphisms with the incidence of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: a meta-analysis. J Autoimmun. (2008) 31:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2008.02.002
19
PatrickBLoYCSuWC. Insights into the protein domains of C-VI TRIM subfamily in viral infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2025) 15:1573422. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1573422
20
GushChinaLVKwiatkowskiTABhattacharyaSWeislederNL. Conserved structural and functional aspects of the tripartite motif gene family point towards therapeutic applications in multiple diseases. Pharmacol Ther. (2018) 185:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.10.020
21
CadenaCAhmadSXavierAWillemsenJParkSParkJWet al. Ubiquitin-dependent and -independent roles of E3 ligase RIPLET in innate immunity. Cell. (2019) 177:1187–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.017
22
EspositoDKoliopoulosMGRittingerK. Structural determinants of TRIM protein function. Biochem Soc Trans. (2017) 45:183–91. doi: 10.1042/BST20160325
23
ChenQYangP. Coiled-coil-domain-mediated TRIM E3 protein condensation modulates enzymatic activity and functional specificity. Cell Rep. (2025) 44. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115766
24
D’CruzAABabonJJNortonRSNicolaNANicholsonSE. Structure and function of the SPRY/B30.2 domain proteins involved in innate immunity. Protein Sci. (2013) 22:1–10. doi: 10.1002/pro.2185
25
PatilGLiS. Tripartite motif proteins: An emerging antiviral protein family. Future virol. (2019) 14:107–22. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2018-0161
26
ChoudhuryNRHeikelGMichlewskiG. TRIM25 and its emerging RNA-binding roles in antiviral defense. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. (2020) 11:e1588. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1588
27
YanJLiQMaoAPHuMMShuHB. TRIM4 modulates type I interferon induction and cellular antiviral response by targeting RIG-I for K63-linked ubiquitination. J Mol Cell Biol. (2014) 6:154–63. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mju005
28
TareenSUEmermanM. Trim5 TAKes on pattern recognition. Cell Host Microbe. (2011) 9:349–50. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.003
29
PertelTHausmannSMorgerDZugerSGuerraJLascanoJet al. TRIM5 is an innate immune sensor for the retrovirus capsid lattice. Nature. (2011) 472:361–5. doi: 10.1038/nature09976
30
ShiMChoHInnKSYangAZhaoZLiangQet al. Negative regulation of NF-κB activity by brain-specific tripartite motif protein 9. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:4820. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5820
31
QinYLiuQTianSXieWCuiJWangRF. TRIM9 short isoform preferentially promotes DNA and RNA virus-induced production of type I interferon by recruiting GSK3β to TBK1. Cell Res. (2016) 26:613–28. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.27
32
LeeYSongBParkCKwonKS. TRIM11 negatively regulates IFNβ production and antiviral activity by targeting TBK1. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e63255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063255
33
ChangTHYoshimiROzatoK. Tripartite motif (TRIM) 12c, a mouse homolog of TRIM5, is a ubiquitin ligase that stimulates type I IFN and NF-κB pathways along with TNFR-associated factor 6. J Immunol. (2015) 195:5367–79. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402064
34
HuangBBaekSH. Trim13 potentiates Toll-like receptor 2–mediated nuclear factor κb activation via K29-linked polyubiquitination of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6. Mol Pharmacol. (2017) 91:307–16. doi: 10.1124/mol.116.106716
35
NarayanKWaggonerLPhamSTHendricksGLWaggonerSNConlonJ. TRIM13 is a negative regulator of MDA5-mediated type I interferon production. J Virol. (2014) 88:10748–57. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02593-13
36
ZhouZJiaXXueQDouZMaYZhaoZet al. TRIM14 is a mitochondrial adaptor that facilitates retinoic acid–inducible gene-I–like receptor-mediated innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2014) 111:E245–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316941111
37
ChenMMengQQinYLiangPTanPHeLet al. TRIM14 inhibits cGAS degradation mediated by selective autophagy receptor p62 to promote innate immune responses. Mol Cell. (2016) 64:105–19. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.025
38
El AsmiFMarouiMADutrieuxJBlondelDNisoleSChelbi-AlixMK. Implication of PMLIV in both intrinsic and innate immunity. PLoS Pathog. (2014) 10:e1003975. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003975
39
SaitohTTun-KyiARyoAYamamotoMFinnGFujitaTet al. Negative regulation of interferon-regulatory factor 3-dependent innate antiviral response by the prolyl isomerase Pin1. Nat Immunol. (2006) 7:598–605. doi: 10.1038/ni1347
40
WuWSXuZXHittelmanWNSalomoniPPandolfiPPChangKS. Promyelocytic leukemia protein sensitizes tumor necrosis factor α-induced apoptosis by inhibiting the NF-κB survival pathway. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:12294–304. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211849200
41
ChaeJJWoodGRichardKJaffeHColburnNTMastersSL. The familial Mediterranean fever protein, pyrin, is cleaved by caspase-1 and activates NF-κB through its N-terminal fragment. Blood. (2008) 112:1794–803. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134932
42
HiggsRLazzariEWynneCNi GabhannJEspinosaAWahren-HerleniusMet al. Self-protection from antiviral responses: Ro52 promotes degradation of the transcription factor IRF7 downstream of the viral Toll-like receptors. PLoS One. (2010) 5:e11776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011776
43
HiggsRNi GabhannJBen LarbiNBreenEPFitzgeraldKAJefferiesCAet al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Ro52 negatively regulates IFN-β production post-pathogen recognition by polyubiquitin-mediated degradation of IRF3. J Immunol. (2008) 181:1780–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.1780
44
McEwanWATamJCWatkinsonREBidgoodSRMalleryDLJamesLC. Intracellular antibody-bound pathogens stimulate immune signaling via the Fc receptor TRIM21. Nat Immunol. (2013) 14:327–36. doi: 10.1038/ni.2548
45
WadaKNiidaMTanakaMKamitaniT. Ro52-mediated monoubiquitination of IKKβ down-regulates NF-κB signaling. J Biochem. (2009) 146:821–32. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvp127
46
ZhangZBaoMLuNWengLYuanBLiuYJ. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM21 negatively regulates the innate immune response to intracellular double-stranded DNA. Nat Immunol. (2013) 14:172–8. doi: 10.1038/ni.2492
47
QiuHHuangFXiaoHSunBYangR. TRIM22 inhibits the TRAF6-stimulated NF-κB pathway by targeting TAB2 for degradation. Virol Sin. (2013) 28:209–15. doi: 10.1007/s12250-013-3343-4
48
ArimotoKIFunamiKSaekiYTanakaKOkawaKTakeuchiOet al. Polyubiquitin conjugation to NEMO by triparite motif protein 23 (TRIM23) is critical in antiviral defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:15856–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004621107
49
PooleEGrovesIMacdonaldAPangYAlcamiASinclairJ. Identification of TRIM23 as a cofactor involved in the regulation of NF-κB by human cytomegalovirus. J Virol. (2009) 83:3581–90. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02072-08
50
ZengWSunLJiangXChenXHouFAdhikariAet al. Reconstitution of the RIG-I pathway reveals a signaling role of unanchored polyubiquitin chains in innate immunity. Cell. (2010) 141:315–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.029
51
PauliEKChanYKDavisMEGableskeSWangMKFeisterKFet al. The ubiquitin-specific protease USP15 promotes RIG-I–mediated antiviral signaling by deubiquitylating TRIM25. Sci Signal. (2014) 7:ra3. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004577
52
RanYZhangJLiuLLPanZYNieYZhangHY. Autoubiquitination of TRIM26 links TBK1 to NEMO in RLR-mediated innate antiviral immune response. J Mol Cell Biol. (2016) 8:31–43. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjv068
53
WangPZhaoWZhaoKZhangLGaoC. TRIM26 negatively regulates interferon-β production and antiviral response through polyubiquitination and degradation of nuclear IRF3. PLoS Pathog. (2015) 11:e1004726. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004726
54
ZhaJHanKJXuLGHeWZhouQChenDet al. The Ret finger protein inhibits signaling mediated by the noncanonical and canonical IκB kinase family members. J Immunol. (2006) 176:1072–80. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.1072
55
LiangQDengHLiXWuXTangQChangTHet al. Tripartite motif-containing protein 28 is a small ubiquitin-related modifier E3 ligase and negative regulator of IFN regulatory factor 7. J Immunol. (2011) 187:4754–63. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101704
56
LiQLinLTongYLiuYMouJWangXet al. TRIM29 negatively controls antiviral immune response through targeting STING for degradation. Cell Discov. (2018) 4:13. doi: 10.1038/s41421-018-0010-9
57
ZhangJCaoLLyuLQiWYangWRenRet al. Regulation of TAK–TAB complex activation through ubiquitylation. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). (2024) 29:169. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2905169
58
WangYLianQYangBYanSZhouHHeLet al. TRIM30α is a negative-feedback regulator of the intracellular DNA and DNA virus-triggered response by targeting STING. PLoS Pathog. (2015) 11:e1005012. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005012
59
LiuBZhangMChuHZhangHWuHSongGet al. The ubiquitin E3 ligase TRIM31 promotes aggregation and activation of the signaling adaptor MAVS through Lys63-linked polyubiquitination. Nat Immunol. (2017) 18:214–24. doi: 10.1038/ni.3641
60
ZhangJHuMMWangYYShuHB. TRIM32 protein modulates type I interferon induction and cellular antiviral response by targeting MITA/STING protein for K63-linked ubiquitination. J Biol Chem. (2012) 287:28646–55. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.362608
61
HuMMXieXQYangQLiaoCYYeWLinHet al. TRIM38 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune and inflammatory responses by two sequential and distinct mechanisms. J Immunol. (2015) 195:4415–25. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500859
62
ZhaoWWangLZhangMYuanCGaoC. E3 ubiquitin ligase tripartite motif 38 negatively regulates TLR-mediated immune responses by proteasomal degradation of TNF receptor–associated factor 6 in macrophages. J Immunol. (2012) 188:2567–74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103255
63
HuMMYangQXieXQLiaoCYLinHLiuTTet al. Sumoylation promotes the stability of the DNA sensor cGAS and the adaptor STING to regulate the kinetics of response to DNA virus. Immunity. (2016) 45:555–69. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.014
64
NoguchiKOkumuraFTakahashiNKataokaAKamiyamaTTodoSet al. TRIM40 promotes neddylation of IKKγ and is downregulated in gastrointestinal cancers. Carcinogenesis. (2011) 32:995–1004. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr068
65
YangBWangJWangYZhouHWuXTianZet al. Novel function of Trim44 promotes an antiviral response by stabilizing VISA. J Immunol. (2013) 190:3613–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202507
66
ShenYLiNLWangJLiuBLesterSLiK. TRIM56 is an essential component of the TLR3 antiviral signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. (2012) 287:36404–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.397075
67
SeoGJKimCShinWJSklanEHEohHJungJU. TRIM56-mediated monoubiquitination of cGAS for cytosolic DNA sensing. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02936-3
68
FangRWangCJiangQLvMGaoPYuXet al. NEMO–IKKβ are essential for IRF3 and NF-κB activation in the cGAS–STING pathway. J Immunol. (2017) 199:3222–33. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700699
69
LangXTangTJinTDingCZhouRJiangW. TRIM65-catalyzed ubiquitination is essential for MDA5-mediated antiviral innate immunity. J Exp Med. (2017) 214:459–73. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160592
70
WynneCLazzariESmithSMcCarthyEMNi GabhannJKallalLE. TRIM68 negatively regulates IFN-β production by degrading TRK fused gene, a novel driver of IFN-β downstream of anti-viral detection systems. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e101503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101503
71
BaiXTangJ. TRIM proteins in breast cancer: Function and mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2023) 640:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.11.103
72
BaiLLiWZhengWXuDChenNCuiJ. Promising targets based on pattern recognition receptors for cancer immunotherapy. Pharmacol Res. (2020) 159:105017. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105017
73
JinZZhuZ. The role of TRIM proteins in PRR signaling pathways and immune-related diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. (2021) 98:107813. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107813
74
Martín-VicenteMMedranoLMResinoSGarcía-SastreAMartínezI. TRIM25 in the regulation of the antiviral innate immunity. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1187. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01187
75
YeWHuMMLeiCQZhouQLinHSunMSet al. TRIM8 negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune response by blocking TRIF–TBK1 interaction. J Immunol. (2017) 199:1856–64. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601647
76
AhsanNShariqMSuroliaARajRKhanMFKumarP. Multipronged regulation of autophagy and apoptosis: emerging role of TRIM proteins. Cell Mol Biol Lett. (2024) 29:13. doi: 10.1186/s11658-023-00528-8
77
HuMMShuHB. Multifaceted roles of TRIM38 in innate immune and inflammatory responses. Cell Mol Immunol. (2017) 14:331–8. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2016.66
78
PariharNBhattLK. Deubiquitylating enzymes: potential target in autoimmune diseases. Inflammopharmacology. (2021) 29:1683–99. doi: 10.1007/s10787-021-00890-z
79
KawasakiTKawaiT. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol. (2014) 5:461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461
80
MarongiuLGornatiLArtusoIZanoniIGranucciF. Below the surface: The inner lives of TLR4 and TLR9. J Leukoc Biol. (2019) 106:147–60. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MIR1218-483RR
81
OwenAMFultsJBPatilNKHernandezABohannonJK. TLR agonists as mediators of trained immunity: mechanistic insight and immunotherapeutic potential to combat infection. Front Immunol. (2021) 11:622614. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.622614
82
MukherjeeSPatraRBehzadiPMasottiAPaoliniASarsharM. Toll-like receptor–guided therapeutic intervention of human cancers: molecular and immunological perspectives. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1244345. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1244345
83
DuanTDuYXingCWangHYWangRF. Toll-like receptor signaling and its role in cell-mediated immunity. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:812774. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.812774
84
ShenZWeiLYuZBYaoZYChengJWangYTet al. The roles of TRIMs in antiviral innate immune signaling. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:628275. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.628275
85
KawaiTAkiraS. Regulation of innate immune signalling pathways by the tripartite motif (TRIM) family proteins. EMBO Mol Med. (2011) 3:513–27. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100160
86
UllahMOSweetMJMansellAKellieSKobeB. TRIF-dependent TLR signaling, its functions in host defense and inflammation, and its potential as a therapeutic target. J Leukoc Biol. (2016) 100:27–45. doi: 10.1189/jlb.2RI1115-531R
87
MarzanoFGuerriniLPesoleGSbisàETulloA. Emerging roles of TRIM8 in health and disease. Cells. (2021) 10:561. doi: 10.3390/cells10030561
88
YangQLiuTTLinHZhangMWeiJLuoWWet al. TRIM32-TAX1BP1-dependent selective autophagic degradation of TRIF negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune responses. PloS Pathog. (2017) 13:e1006600. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006600
89
HuangXLiYLiXFanDXinHBFuM. TRIM14 promotes endothelial activation via activating NF-κB signaling pathway. J Mol Cell Biol. (2020) 12:176–89. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz040
90
O’NeillLAGolenbockDBowieAG. The history of Toll-like receptors—redefining innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. (2013) 13:453–60. doi: 10.1038/nri3446
91
KawaiTIkegawaMOriDAkiraS. Decoding Toll-like receptors: recent insights and perspectives in innate immunity. Immunity. (2024) 57:649–73. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.03.004
92
LinSCLoYCWuH. Helical assembly in the MyD88–IRAK4–IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling. Nature. (2010) 465:885–90. doi: 10.1038/nature09121
93
YangLXiaH. TRIM proteins in inflammation: from expression to emerging regulatory mechanisms. Inflammation. (2021) 44:811–20. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01394-8
94
FletcherAJVaysburdMMaslenSZengJSkehelJMTowersGJet al. Trivalent RING assembly on retroviral capsids activates TRIM5 ubiquitination and innate immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe. (2018) 24:761–775.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.10.007
95
LiQYanJMaoAPLiCRanYShuHBet al. Tripartite motif 8 (TRIM8) modulates TNFα- and IL-1β–triggered NF-κB activation by targeting TAK1 for K63-linked polyubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2011) 108:19341–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110946108
96
OnomotoKOnoguchiKYoneyamaM. Regulation of RIG-I-like receptor–mediated signaling: interaction between host and viral factors. Cell Mol Immunol. (2021) 18:539–55. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00602-7
97
KawaiTAkiraS. The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition. Int Immunol. (2009) 21:317–37. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxp017
98
Fornari LaurindoLAparecido DiasJCressoni AraujoATorres PominiKMaChado GalhardiCRucco Penteado DetregiachiCet al. Immunological dimensions of neuroinflammation and microglial activation: exploring innovative immunomodulatory approaches to mitigate neuroinflammatory progression. Front Immunol. (2024) 14:1305933. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1305933
99
SethRBSunLEaCKChenZJ. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-κB and IRF3. Cell. (2005) 122:669–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012
100
YoneyamaMKatoHFujitaT. Physiological functions of RIG-I-like receptors. Immunity. (2024) 57:731–51. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.03.003
101
KatoHFujitaT. RIG-I-like receptors and autoimmune diseases. Curr Opin Immunol. (2015) 37:40–5. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.10.002
102
SunNJiangLYeMWangYWangGWanXet al. TRIM35 mediates protection against influenza infection by activating TRAF3 and degrading viral PB2. Protein Cell. (2020) 11:894–914. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00734-6
103
LiXYuZFangQYangMHuangJLiZet al. The transmembrane endoplasmic reticulum–associated E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM13 restrains the pathogenic-DNA–triggered inflammatory response. Sci Adv. (2022) 8:eabh0496. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abh0496
104
MosallanejadKKaganJC. Control of innate immunity by the cGAS-STING pathway. Immunol Cell Biol. (2022) 100:409–23. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12555
105
HopfnerKPHornungV. Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2020) 21:501–21. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0244-x
106
GaoKMMarshak-RothsteinAFitzgeraldKA. Type-1 interferon-dependent and -independent mechanisms in cyclic GMP–AMP synthase–stimulator of interferon genes-driven auto-inflammation. Curr Opin Immunol. (2023) 80:102280. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2022.102280
107
HuHSunSC. Ubiquitin signaling in immune responses. Cell Res. (2016) 26:457–83. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.40
108
Fernández-AguilarLMVico-BarrancoIArbulo-EchevarriaMMAguadoE. A story of kinases and adaptors: the role of LCK, ZAP-70 and LAT in switch panel governing T-cell development and activation. Biol (Basel). (2023) 12:1163. doi: 10.3390/biology12091163
109
YangWGuZZhangHHuH. To TRIM the immunity: from innate to adaptive immunity. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:2157. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02157
110
LiuYWangZde la TorreRBarlingATsujikawaTHornickNet al. Trim32 deficiency enhances Th2 immunity and predisposes to features of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. (2017) 137:359–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.09.020
111
YuTYangXFuQLiangJWuXShengJet al. TRIM11 attenuates Treg cell differentiation by p62-selective autophagic degradation of AIM2. Cell Rep. (2023) 42:113235. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113231
112
UthirapathySAhmedATJawadMJainVBallalSAl-HettyHRAKet al. Tripartite motif (TRIM) proteins roles in the regulation of immune system responses: focus on autoimmune diseases. Exp Cell Res. (2024) 430:114379. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2024.114379
113
CaiXSrivastavaSSunYLiZWuHZuvela-JelaskaLet al. Tripartite motif containing protein 27 negatively regulates CD4 T cells by ubiquitinating and inhibiting the class II PI3K-C2β. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2011) 108:20072–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111233109
114
FriendSFDeason-TowneFPetersonLKBergerAJDragoneLL. Regulation of T cell receptor complex-mediated signaling by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications. Am J Clin Exp Immunol. (2014) 3:107–23.
115
IshiiTOhnumaKMurakamiATakasawaNYamochiTIwataSet al. SS-A/Ro52, an autoantigen involved in CD28-mediated IL-2 production. J Immunol. (2003) 170:3653–61. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3653
116
EspinosaADardalhonVBraunerSAmbrosiAHiggsRQuintanaFJet al. Loss of the lupus autoantigen Ro52/Trim21 induces tissue inflammation and systemic autoimmunity by disregulating the IL-23–Th17 pathway. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:1661–71. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090585
117
KunishitaYYoshimiRKamiyamaRKishimotoDYoshidaKHashimotoEet al. TRIM21 dysfunction enhances aberrant B-cell differentiation in autoimmune pathogenesis. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:98. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00098
118
ChoiUYHurJYLeeMSZhangQChoiWYKimLKet al. Tripartite motif-containing protein 30 modulates TCR-activated proliferation and effector functions in CD4+ T cells. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e95805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095805
119
WeiKLiRZhaoXXieBXieTSunQet al. TRIM28 is an essential regulator of three-dimensional chromatin state underpinning CD8+ T cell activation. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:750. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56029-z
120
JiangYLiuYLuHSunSCJinWWangXet al. Epigenetic activation during T helper 17 cell differentiation is mediated by Tripartite motif containing 28. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03852-2
121
ChikumaSYamanakaSNakagawaSUedaMTHayabuchiHTokifujiYet al. TRIM28 expression on dendritic cells prevents excessive T cell priming by silencing endogenous retrovirus. J Immunol. (2021) 206:1528–39. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001003
122
AndersonKRyanNNedungadiDLamenzaFSwinglerMSiddiquiAet al. STAT1 is regulated by TRIM24 and promotes immunosuppression in head and neck squamous carcinoma cells, but enhances T-cell antitumour immunity in the tumour microenvironment. Br J Cancer. (2022) 127:624–36. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01853-z
123
Perez-LloretJOkoyeISGuidiRKannanYCoomesSMCziesoSet al. T-cell-intrinsic Tif1α/Trim24 regulates IL-1R expression on TH2 cells and TH2 cell-mediated airway allergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2016) 113:E568–76. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522287113
124
WangZYooYJde la TorreRTophamCHanifinJSimpsonEet al. Inverse correlation of TRIM32 and protein kinase C ζ in T helper type 2–biased inflammation. J Invest Dermatol. (2021) 141:1297–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.09.021
125
LinLYuHLiLYangWChenXGongYet al. TRIM55 promotes noncanonical NF-κB signaling and B cell–mediated immune responses by coordinating p100 ubiquitination and processing. Sci Signal. (2023) 16:eabn5410. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.abn5410
126
WangEKawaokaSRoeJSShiJHohmannAFXuYet al. The transcriptional cofactor TRIM33 prevents apoptosis in B lymphoblastic leukemia by deactivating a single enhancer. eLife. (2015) 4:e06377. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06377
127
ShenXLiXWuTGuoTLvJHeZet al. TRIM33 plays a critical role in regulating dendritic cell differentiation and homeostasis by modulating Irf8 and Bcl2l11 transcription. Cell Mol Immunol. (2024) 21:752–69. doi: 10.1038/s41423-024-01179-1
128
JonesELLaidlawSMDustinLB. TRIM21/Ro52—roles in innate immunity and autoimmune disease. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:738473. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.738473
129
KimDSParkYTsokosGCChoMLKwokSK. The ubiquitin E3 ligase TRIM21 suppresses type I interferon signaling via STING degradation and ameliorates systemic autoimmunity. Exp Mol Med. (2025) 57:1555–66. doi: 10.1038/s12276-025-01490-5
130
PanZYangQZhangXXuXSunYZhouFet al. TRIM5 promotes systemic lupus erythematosus through CD4(+) T cells and macrophage. Int J Gen Med. (2023) 16:3567–80. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S416493
131
ShiboskiCHInternational Sjögren’s Syndrome Criteria Working Group. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis. (2017) 69:35. doi: 10.1002/art.39859
132
Amezcua-GuerraLMPérez-GarcíaLFJiménez-RojasVMárquez-VelascoRSilveiraLH. Anti-Ro52/TRIM21 antibodies are associated with aberrant inflammatory circuits in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Gac Med Mex. (2023) 159:56–65. doi: 10.24875/GMM.M22000739
133
KamiyamaRYoshimiRTakenoMIribeYTsukaharaTKishimotoDet al. Dysfunction of TRIM21 in interferon signature of systemic lupus erythematosus. Mod Rheumatol. (2018) 28:993–1003. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1436028
134
ChenRTieYLuJLiLZengZChenMet al. Tripartite motif family proteins in inflammatory bowel disease: Mechanisms and potential for interventions. Cell Prolif. (2022) 55:e13222. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13222
135
ZhouGWuHLinJLinRFengBLiuZ. TRIM21 is decreased in colitis-associated cancer and negatively regulates epithelial carcinogenesis. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2021) 27:458–68. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa229
136
LiQLeeCHPetersLAMastropaoloLAThoeniCElkadriAet al. Variants in TRIM22 that affect NOD2 signaling are associated with very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. (2016) 150:1196–207. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.031
137
ZhangHXXuZSLinHLiMXiaTCuiKet al. TRIM27 mediates STAT3 activation at retromer-positive structures to promote colitis and colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:3441. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05796-z
138
WangJZhaoDLeiZGePLuZChaiQet al. TRIM27 maintains gut homeostasis by promoting intestinal stem cell self-renewal. Cell Mol Immunol. (2023) 20:158–74. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00963-1
139
DengNHTianZZouYJQuanSB. E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM31: A potential therapeutic target. BioMed Pharmacother. (2024) 176:116846. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116846
140
ManukyanGAminovR. Update on pyrin functions and mechanisms of familial Mediterranean fever. Front Microbiol. (2016) 7:456. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00456
141
ZhouXChenYCuiLShiYGuoC. Advances in the pathogenesis of psoriasis: from keratinocyte perspective. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:81. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04523-3
142
ChenXYXuFChenJQLandeckLChenSQZhouYet al. UBE2L3 reduces TRIM21 expression and IL-1β secretion in epidermal keratinocytes and improves psoriasis-like skin. J Invest Dermatol. (2023) 143:822–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.10.016
143
XiaoTWanJQuHLiY. Tripartite-motif protein 21 knockdown extenuates LPS-triggered neurotoxicity by inhibiting microglial M1 polarization via suppressing NF-κB-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Arch Biochem Biophys. (2021) 706:108918. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108918
144
ZhangJZhuJChenXXiaHYangL. E3 ubiquitin ligase Trim33 ubiquitylates Annexin A2 to promote NF-κB induced skin inflammation in psoriasis. J Dermatol Sci. (2022) 107:160–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2022.09.002
145
Billaut-MulotOCocudeCKolesnitchenkoVTruongMJChanEKHachulaEet al. SS-56, a novel cellular target of autoantibody responses in Sjögren syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest. (2001) 108:861–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI200113469
146
LinYLuoZ. NLRP6 facilitates the interaction between TAB2/3 and TRIM38 in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. FEBS Lett. (2017) 591:1141–9. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12622
147
WangMWuJGuoYChangXChengT. The tripartite motif-containing protein 3 on the proliferation and cytokine secretion of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Mol Med Rep. (2017) 15:1607–12. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6164
148
AhmedMQAl-SharifiZARGorialF. Serum levels of tripartite motif-containing protein 72 (TRIM72) in Iraqi rheumatoid arthritis patients and its relevance to the disease activity state. J Adv Med BioMed Res. (2023) 31:602–11. doi: 10.30699/jambs.31.149.602
149
HuangDTaoLDuX. KLF9 positively regulates TRIM33 to inhibit abnormal synovial fibroblast proliferation, migration as well as inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Immun Inflammation Dis. (2022) 10:e696. doi: 10.1002/iid3.696
150
YangLHuCChenXZhangJFengZXiaoYet al. Upregulated expression of ubiquitin ligase TRIM21 promotes PKM2 nuclear translocation and astrocyte activation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. eLife. (2024) 13:RP98181. doi: 10.7554/eLife.98181.3
151
MarchukMDovbonosTMakukhHSemeryakOSharhorodskaY. Sarcotubular myopathy due to novel TRIM32 mutation in association with multiple sclerosis. Brain Sci. (2021) 11:1020. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081020
152
TovoPARibaldoneDGGallianoICavigliaGPDiniMVeglioVet al. Enhanced transcription of human endogenous retroviruses and TRIM28 downregulation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Viruses. (2024) 16:1570. doi: 10.3390/v16101570
153
ZamanMMUShinagawaTIshiiS. Trim27-deficient mice are susceptible to streptozotocin-induced diabetes. FEBS Open Bio. (2014) 4:60–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2013.12.002
154
WuHKZhangYCaoCMHuXFangMYaoYet al. Glucose-sensitive myokine/cardiokine MG53 regulates systemic insulin response and metabolic homeostasis. Circulation. (2019) 139:901–14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037216
155
ChenJFengXZhouXLiY. Role of the tripartite motif-containing (TRIM) family of proteins in insulin resistance and related disorders. Diabetes Obes Metab. (2024) 26:3–15. doi: 10.1111/dom.15294
156
KuhlmannTMocciaMCoetzeeTCohenJACorrealeJGravesJet al. Multiple sclerosis progression: time for a new mechanism-driven framework. Lancet Neurol. (2023) 22:78–88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00289-7
157
BaladaEOrdi-RosJVilardell-TarrésM. Molecular mechanisms mediated by human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) in autoimmunity. Rev Med Virol. (2009) 19:273–86. doi: 10.1002/rmv.622
158
MorrisGMaesMMurdjevaMPuriBK. Do human endogenous retroviruses contribute to multiple sclerosis, and if so, how? Mol Neurobiol. (2019) 56:2590–605. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1255-x
159
JiangQWangXHuangEWangQWenCYangGet al. Inflammasome and its therapeutic targeting in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. (2022) 12:816839. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.816839
160
HeZLiuBXianZGongAJiaX. Ferroptosis in autoimmune diseases: research advances and therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:10449. doi: 10.3390/ijms262110449
161
XuNFuWWuJZhaoSTianC. The protective role of TRIM16 in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms of modulating ferroptosis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2025) 166:115573. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115573
162
MandellMASahaBThompsonTA. The tripartite nexus: autophagy, cancer, and tripartite motif-containing protein family members. Front Pharmacol. (2020) 11:308. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00308
163
MadhukarGHaqueMAKhanSKimJJ. E3 ubiquitin ligases and their therapeutic potential in disease management. Biochem Pharmacol. (2025) 236:116875. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2025.116875
164
Rodríguez-GimenoAGaldeanoC. Drug discovery approaches to target E3 ligases. ChemBioChem. (2025) 26:e202400656. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202400656
165
RenJYuPLiuSLiRNiuXChenYet al. Deubiquitylating enzymes in cancer and immunity. Adv Sci. (2023) 10:2303807. doi: 10.1002/advs.202303807
166
D’AmicoFMukhopadhyayROvaaHMulderMP. Targeting TRIM proteins: a quest towards drugging an emerging protein class. ChemBioChem. (2021) 22:2011–31. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000787
167
SimonettaKRTaygerlyJBoyleKBashamSEPadovaniCLouYet al. Prospective discovery of small molecule enhancers of an E3 ligase-substrate interaction. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:1402. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09358-9
168
PaivaSLCrewsCM. Targeted protein degradation: elements of PROTAC design. Curr Opin Chem Biol. (2019) 50:111–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.02.022
169
LiQWuPDuQHanifUHuHLiK. cGAS–STING, an important signaling pathway in diseases and their therapy. MedComm. (2024) 5:e511. doi: 10.1002/mco2.511
170
DengCChenDYangLZhangYJinCLiYet al. The role of cGAS-STING pathway ubiquitination in innate immunity and multiple diseases. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1522200. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1522200
171
YoshimiRIshigatsuboYOzatoK. Autoantigen TRIM21/Ro52 as a possible target for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheumatol. (2012) 2012:718237. doi: 10.1155/2012/718237
172
HsuCHYuYL. The interconnected roles of TRIM21/Ro52 in systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren’s syndrome, cancers, and cancer metabolism. Cancer Cell Int. (2023) 23:289. doi: 10.1186/s12935-023-03143-x
173
MeroniGDiez-RouxG. TRIM/RBCC, a novel class of ‘single protein RING finger’ E3 ubiquitin ligases. Bioessays. (2005) 27:1147–57. doi: 10.1002/bies.20304
174
KoliopoulosMGEspositoDChristodoulouETaylorIARittingerK. Functional role of TRIM E3 ligase oligomerization and regulation of catalytic activity. EMBO J. (2016) 35:1204–18. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593741
175
HatakeyamaS. TRIM family proteins: roles in autophagy, immunity, and carcinogenesis. Trends Biochem Sci. (2017) 42:297–311. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.01.002
176
Serelli-LeeVItoKKoibuchiATanigawaTUenoTMatsushimaNet al. A state-of-the-art roadmap for biomarker-driven drug development in the era of personalized therapies. J Pers Med. (2022) 12:669. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050669
177
LiuXLiBLinYMaXLiuYMaLet al. Exploring the shared gene signatures and mechanism among three autoimmune diseases by bulk RNA sequencing integrated with single-cell RNA sequencing analysis. Front Mol Biosci. (2025) 11:1520050. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1520050
178
EbadiPStrattonCMOlsenSK. E3 ubiquitin ligases in signaling, disease, and therapeutics. Trends Biochem Sci. (2025) 50:960-76. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2025.07.009
179
LiuMWangYZhangYHuDTangLZhouBet al. Landscape of small nucleic acid therapeutics: moving from the bench to the clinic as next-generation medicines. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2025) 10:73. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02112-8
180
LiJMHuangJLiaoYHuTWangCLZhangWZet al. Gene and RNA editing: revolutionary approaches to treating diseases. MedComm. (2025) 6:e70389. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70389
181
PavlovicKTristán-ManzanoMMaldonado-PérezNCortijo-GutierrezMSánchez-HernándezSJusticia-LirioPet al. Using gene editing approaches to fine-tune the immune system. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:570672. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.570672
182
ShahVVDuncanADJiangSStrattonSAAlltonKLYamCet al. Mammary-specific expression of Trim24 establishes a mouse model of human metaplastic breast cancer. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:5389. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25650-z
183
WangCZhangYDengJLiangBXingD. Developments of PROTACs technology in immune-related diseases. Eur J Med Chem. (2023) 249:115127. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115127
184
BondesonDPCrewsCM. Targeted protein degradation by small molecules. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (2017) 57:107–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010715-103507
185
RajsbaumRAlbrechtRAWangMKMaharajNPVersteegGANistal-VillánEet al. Species-specific inhibition of RIG-I ubiquitination and IFN induction by the influenza A virus NS1 protein. PLoS Pathog. (2012) 8:e1003059. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003059
186
ZhongGChangXXieWZhouX. Targeted protein degradation: advances in drug discovery and clinical practice. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:308. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02004-x
Summary
Keywords
adaptive immunity, autoimmune diseases, immunotherapy targets, innate immunity, pattern recognition receptors, TRIM proteins, ubiquitination
Citation
Jawed B, Kanwal R, Zakir SK, Gaudio F, Esposito JE, Ishaqui AA, Martinotti S, Botteghi M and Toniato E (2026) TRIM proteins as emerging regulators of immune pathways: potential therapeutic targets in immune-related disorders. Front. Immunol. 17:1764253. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1764253
Received
09 December 2025
Revised
22 January 2026
Accepted
26 January 2026
Published
11 February 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Edited by
Mark R Zielinski, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, United States
Reviewed by
Yafeng Qiu, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
Junjie Gu, Sichuan University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Jawed, Kanwal, Zakir, Gaudio, Esposito, Ishaqui, Martinotti, Botteghi and Toniato.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Stefano Martinotti, martinotti@lum.it
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.