SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders : Autoimmune Disorders
Safety and Efficacy of Oral Icotrokinra for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Retaj S AlJuma 1
Sayed Hashim 2
Malak Ahmed Alshamali 2
Shouq Alkhatlan 3
Danah Jamil Hammadi 4
Abdullah M Alharran 1
1. College of Medicine and Medical Science, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
2. Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, Safat, Kuwait
3. Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
4. RCSI Bahrain, Adliya, Bahrain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Background: Biologic therapies targeting inflammatory cytokines have transformed the management of plaque psoriasis; however, their use is limited by high cost, parenteral administration, and monitoring requirements. Icotrokinra (JNJ-77242113) is a first-in-class oral peptide that selectively inhibits the interleukin-23 (IL-23) receptor and represents a potential oral alternative. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral icotrokinra in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to November 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adolescents or adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with oral icotrokinra (200 mg once daily) versus placebo. A random-effects model was applied, and dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using ROB-2, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to evaluate the conclusiveness of evidence. Results: Five RCTs comprising 1,951 participants were included. At week 16, icotrokinra significantly improved Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 (RR = 7.27, 95% CI 5.62–9.40) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 responses (RR = 6.70, 95% CI 5.20–8.62) compared with placebo (both p < 0.001). Higher levels of skin clearance were also achieved, including PASI 90 (RR = 13.82, 95% CI 8.75–21.84) and PASI 100 (RR = 31.65, 95% CI 12.56–79.76). Significant benefits were observed in scalp-specific disease (ss-IGA; RR = 4.27) and patient-reported outcomes, including complete symptom resolution on the Psoriasis Symptom Scale Diary (RR = 9.76). Adverse event rates did not differ significantly between icotrokinra and placebo, and heterogeneity across outcomes was minimal. TSA indicated that current evidence remains insufficient to confirm definitive conclusions. Conclusion: Oral icotrokinra demonstrates potential efficacy across multiple clinical and patient-reported endpoints with a safety profile comparable to placebo in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, TSA indicates that the required information size has not been reached. Therefore, current evidence remains insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Future RCTs with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings.
Summary
Keywords
Icotrokinra, Investigator's Global Assessment, Oral Icotrokinra, Plaque psoriasis, psoriasis area and severity index
Received
15 December 2025
Accepted
19 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 AlJuma, Hashim, Alshamali, Alkhatlan, Hammadi and Alharran. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Abdullah M Alharran
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.