You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol.

Sec. Alloimmunity and Transplantation

Advances in Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Monitoring for Solid Organ Transplantation

  • 1. Devyser AB, 823384, Stockholm, Sweden

  • 2. Karolinska Institutet Institutionen for medicin Huddinge, Huddinge, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive biomarker of allograft injury following solid organ transplantation. However, its clinical performance and interpretability depend strongly on how dd-cfDNA is measured, reported, and integrated into existing care pathways. This narrative review outlines the biological rationale for dd-cfDNA monitoring and explores the key preanalytical and analytical factors affecting test performance, with an emphasis on comparing measurement technologies and commonly used diagnostic systems. We examine major assay strategies, including next-generation sequencing approaches and PCR-based methods, including digital PCR, and discuss how assay design influences the need for donor/recipient genotyping, analytical sensitivity, susceptibility to clinical confounders (e.g., early post-operative injury, infection, leukopenia, and multi-organ DNA sources), turnaround time, batching, and quality control requirements in centralized versus decentralized testing models. We synthesize evidence for clinical validity and utility across transplanted organs, focusing on use cases such as early detection of injury, risk stratification, and supporting biopsy decisions, while highlighting ongoing challenges like threshold harmonization, inter-platform comparability, and imperfect specificity for distinguishing rejection from non-rejection injury. Overall, dd-cfDNA serves as a valuable adjunct for graft surveillance, but broader clinical applications will require standardized guidance for assay performance and reporting, platform-aware interpretation frameworks, and prospective outcome-focused studies to define optimal testing intervals and decision thresholds.

Summary

Keywords

allograft rejection, Assay standardization, biomarker, digital PCR, donor-derived cell-free DNA, Next-generationsequencing, Transplantation

Received

16 December 2025

Accepted

17 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Sairafi, Foord, Pettersson and Uhlin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Darius Sairafi

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics