ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
This article is part of the Research TopicMulti-Omics Interrogation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages: Paving the Way for Next-Generation Cancer ImmunotherapiesView all 11 articles
Occupational Silica Exposure Drives Systemic Immune Dysregulation and Tumor Microenvironment Susceptibility: Evidence from a Real-World Study
Provisionally accepted- 1North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
- 2Children‘s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 3Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China
- 4Chongqing Jiulongpo District People's Hospital, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background Occupational exposure to carcinogenic dusts such as silica is a well-established risk factor for cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms linking early exposure to tumor-promoting microenvironmental changes remain poorly defined. Emerging evidence suggests that chronic immune dysregulation and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment (TME) may serve as critical intermediates. Methods We analyzed occupational health data from 5,482 industrial workers in Anhui Province, China. Explainable machine learning models were constructed using exposure profiles and hematological immune parameters to predict carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) positivity, with feature contributions interpreted via SHAP values. Experimental validation involved silica-stimulated THP-1 monocytes and colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines to assess inflammatory activation and paracrine regulation of CEA. Silica-and CRC-associated genes were integrated from public databases to construct protein–protein interaction networks, identify hub genes, and evaluate prognostic significance using TCGA and GSE39582 datasets. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis was used to resolve cell type–specific expression patterns. Results Among 14 algorithms tested, CatBoost exhibited the highest predictive performance for CEA positivity. SHAP analysis highlighted the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and silica exposure as dominant contributors. Mediation analysis confirmed that systemic inflammation partially mediated the silica–CEA association. In vitro, silica activated NF-κB–dependent IL-6 secretion in THP-1 cells, and conditioned media dose-dependently upregulated CEA expression in CRC cells—an effect attenuated by NF-κB inhibition or IL-6 neutralization. Multi-omics analysis identified overlapping genes linking silica exposure to CRC, with enrichment in cytokine signaling, adhesion, and matrix remodeling pathways. A hub gene–based risk score was significantly associated with overall survival. scRNA-seq analysis revealed elevated expression of inflammation-and adhesion-related genes in tumor-associated macrophages. Conclusions Occupational silica exposure induces macrophage-driven inflammatory signaling that promotes early CEA elevation and TME remodeling. Integrating machine learning with experimental and multi-omics validation provides a translational framework for identifying exposure-responsive biomarkers and immune-related cancer risk in occupational settings.
Keywords: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Occupational Exposure, Silica dust, Tumor Microenvironment, Tumor-associated macrophages
Received: 25 Dec 2025; Accepted: 13 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Gao, Zhang, Qiang, Zhao and Baishan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Liu Baishan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
