Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mech. Eng.

Sec. Digital Manufacturing

Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmech.2025.1666571

A Hybrid FAHP–Entropy–TOPSIS Model for Selecting the Facility Layout in Small-Scale Manufacturing

Provisionally accepted
Parveen  SharmaParveen Sharma1Kashmir  Singh GhatorhaKashmir Singh Ghatorha1Lenka  CepovaLenka Cepova2Nillohit  Mitra RayNillohit Mitra Ray1Ajay  KumarAjay Kumar3*Saneh  Lata YadavSaneh Lata Yadav4Vladimira  SchindlerovaVladimira Schindlerova2Rakesh Kumar  PhandenRakesh Kumar Phanden5
  • 1Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India
  • 2Vysoka skola banska-Technicka univerzita Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia
  • 3Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India
  • 4K R Mangalam University, Gurugram, India
  • 5Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The strategic layout of a facility is crucial for achieving optimal productivity, operational efficiency, and ergonomic functionality in manufacturing systems. The availability of resources on the shop floor has a direct impact on how effectively each industry performs its tasks. The current study proposes a combined approach for selecting the optimal layout design from several options for a specific small-scale manufacturing industry. To achieve this, authors employed the FAHP to make decisions in the presence of uncertainty, the Entropy method to assign objective weights to different criteria, and the TOPSIS method to rank design options based on their proximity to the ideal solution. Five different facility layout designs were evaluated, with three qualitative factors examined: layout flexibility, shop floor utilisation, and ergonomics. The method is designed for use in a car parts manufacturing company that has experienced operational bottlenecks and poor shop floor layout for years. The people in charge, as well as the industry management, were unsatisfied with the setup. The results show that Layout 5 is superior to the others because it can be modified and outperforms all the other criteria used to evaluate it. The current study provides a comprehensive model to help small-scale industries, which are often at the bottom of the industrial hierarchy, transition from simple methods to more advanced ones in making decisions about layout design.

Keywords: Manufacturing optimisation, Multi-criteria decision-making, Facility layout planning, TOPSIS, FAHP Entropy weighting, Layout flexibility, ergonomics

Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sharma, Singh Ghatorha, Cepova, Ray, Kumar, Yadav, Schindlerova and Phanden. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ajay Kumar, ajay.kumar30886@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.