Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mech. Eng.

Sec. Mechatronics

This article is part of the Research TopicNavigating Perceived Crime Risks in Autonomous Urban TransportView all articles

Safety and Security Perception in Shared Autonomous Shuttles: A User-Centred Evaluation of Interface Design and Passenger Behaviour

Provisionally accepted
  • 1CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Fundacion Tecnalia Research & Innovation, San Sebastián, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Understanding how passengers interpret information in shared autonomous shuttles requires Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs) that support trust, safety, and privacy across both routine and non-routine situations. This study presents an integrated evaluation of an audio-visual HMI through an online survey (N = 66) and a preliminary real-world field study (N = 12). Across both contexts, passengers preferred concise, context-dependent communication, with brief multimodal cues judged most effective for conveying upcoming manoeuvres, degraded modes, and emergency events. Transparency in vehicle-to-passenger communication, such as timely indications of system state and manoeuvre intent, was generally well received. In contrast, transparency in passenger-to-passenger visibility, such as displaying other passengers’ entry or exit locations, was rejected by both genders, although women showed stronger privacy sensitivity and greater perceived vulnerability to such exposure. Women also expressed a higher preference for discreet, non-confrontational security features. These findings demonstrate that effective HMI design for shared autonomous mobility must distinguish between system transparency and interpersonal information exposure, supporting controlled information asymmetry and privacy-protective security mechanisms. The study provides empirically grounded directions for developing inclusive and trustworthy HMIs for future autonomous public transport.

Keywords: HMI (Human Machine Interface), Autonomous shuttle, Online survey, Real-world testing, Safety, security, Gender difference

Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bolzmacher, Panëels, Louison, Hidalgo, Marcano, DIAZ and Anastassova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Christian Bolzmacher

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.