In bacteria and archaea, genome size and guanine–cytosine (GC) content are correlated (Bentley and Parkhill, 2004; Musto et al., 2006; Mitchell, 2007; Suzuki et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2009). These parameters show greater correlation in bacteria (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.46) than in archaea (r = 0.195) (Nishida, 2012a). The GC content in bacteria varies widely from 13.5% in “Candidatus Zinderia insecticola” (McCutcheon and Moran, 2010) to 74.9% in Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans (Thomas et al., 2008). Although the GC content is similar among closely related bacteria, sometimes, the GC content is similar in phylogenetically distant bacteria. The distribution of GC content in bacterial genomes differs from a Gaussian distribution with multiple peaks.
Bacterial chromosome organization is mediated by nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) (Wang et al., 2011). The specificity of NAP–DNA binding is determined by the differences in the GC content in specific regions of the DNA (Lucchini et al., 2006; Navarre et al., 2006; Castang et al., 2008; Smits and Grossman, 2010; Yun et al., 2010; Gordon et al., 2011). For example, the Salmonella NAP specifically binds to DNA regions with low GC content and inhibits expression of the genes present in these regions (Lucchini et al., 2006; Navarre et al., 2006). NAPs vary among bacteria (Ali et al., 2012). In addition, the NAP genes are located in the plasmid as well as in the chromosome, suggesting that these genes have been distributed via plasmids (Takeda et al., 2011). I hypothesize that the GC content distribution may be related to the variation in bacterial NAPs (Nishida, 2012b, 2013). However, the correlation between the genome size and GC content in bacteria is poorly understood.
The obligate host-associated bacteria contain short genomes with low GC content (Mira et al., 2002; Moran, 2002; McCutcheon and Moran, 2012). Insertion sequence elements play an important role in the genome reduction of the host-associated bacteria (Song et al., 2010), whose small population size and asexual mode of reproduction lead to reduction of the genome size. In addition, deletion of the genes involved in DNA repair may contribute to a GC-poor genome (Moran et al., 2008). However, genome size reduction is not limited to the obligate host-associated bacteria (Nilsson et al., 2005). Generally, bacteria show a bias toward genomic deletions than insertions (Mira et al., 2001). Thus, bacteria must acquire additional genes to adapt to different environments.
Some bacterial lineages, for example, Actinobacteria, have maintained long genomes with high GC content. Plasmids (and viruses) have played an important role in additional gene uptake into chromosomes (Davison, 1999; Sørensen et al., 2005; Harrison and Brockhurst, 2012). Occasionally, the plasmid DNA gets integrated into the host chromosomal DNA (Harrison and Brockhurst, 2012). In addition, viral DNA occasionally remains in the chromosome as a prophage. Horizontally transferred DNA, plasmid DNA, and virus DNA have lower GC content than host chromosome DNAs (Rocha and Danchin, 2002). In a previous study, I compared the GC content across 953 pairs of bacterial chromosomes and plasmids. Among the 953 pairs, 746 (78.3%) pairs showed <10% difference in the GC content of the plasmid DNA and the host chromosomal DNA (Nishida, 2012a). Probably, most bacteria are unable to maintain and regulate plasmids that show very different GC content from their own. However, why most bacteria have not acquired DNAs with GC content higher than that of their own chromosome, but have acquired DNAs with lower GC content is not clear.
During evolution, DNA base mutations occurred intracellulaly and not in extracellular environments. The DNA polymerase components that are involved in DNA replication directly influence the base composition of the genome (Zhao et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2012). Variations in the bacterial genome DNA sequences cannot be fully explained on the basis of neutral mutations alone (Sueoka, 1988). In bacterial genomes, mutations from GC to adenosine–thymine (AT) are more common than mutations from AT to GC (Lind and Andersson, 2008; Hershberg and Petrov, 2010; Hildebrand et al., 2010; Rocha and Feil, 2010). I hypothesize that plasmids (and viruses) have been generated from the chromosome (Frontiers Research Topics, “Evolution and function of bacterial and archaeal genome sequences”). The host bacterial genome DNA has undergone a series of changes during evolution to become AT rich. On the other hand, the GC content in a plasmid that is in an extracellular environment would not change. Such a plasmid will not be accepted by the original host bacterium because most bacteria appear unable to acquire DNAs with GC content higher than that in their own chromosome. Such plasmids are transferred to bacteria that contain genomes with GC content higher than that in the plasmid (Figure 1). This natural system may be effective for obtaining useful genetic information (DNA fragments) from phylogenetically distant bacteria. I propose that the genome size and GC content in bacteria are correlated because genetic information has been transferred from AT-rich chromosomes to GC-rich chromosomes during evolution. If most bacteria could acquire DNAs with GC content higher than that in their own chromosome in addition to the lower GC content DNAs, then the flow of DNA fragments would not be biased and the genome size and GC content would not show a correlation. The results of previous studies indicate that bacteria contain a system (or systems) to generate and maintain GC content differences in the chromosomal DNA (e.g., Lawrence and Ochman, 1997). In order to maintain GC content, bacteria should estimate the DNA base composition of the transferred DNA fragments.
Figure 1
References
1
AliS. S.XiaB.LiuJ.NavarreW. W. (2012). Silencing of foreign DNA in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15, 175–181. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.12.014
2
BentleyS. D.ParkhillJ. (2004). Comparative genomic structure of prokaryotes. Ann. Rev. Genet. 38, 771–792. 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.094318
3
CastangS.McManusH. R.TurnerK. H.DoveS. L. (2008). H-NS family members function coordinately in an opportunistic pathogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 18947–18952. 10.1073/pnas.0808215105
4
DavisonJ. (1999). Genetic exchange between bacteria in the environment. Plasmid42, 73–91. 10.1006/plas.1999.1421
5
GordonB. R. G.LiY.CoteA.WeirauchM. T.DingP.HughesT. R.et al. (2011). Structural basis for recognition of AT-rich DNA by unrelated exnogeneic silencing proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 10690–10695. 10.1073/pnas.1102544108
6
GuoF. B.LinH.HuangJ. (2009). A plot of G + C content against sequence length of 640 bacterial chromosomes shows the points are widely scattered in the upper triangular area. Chromosome Res. 17, 359–364. 10.1007/s10577-009-9024-3
7
HarrisonE.BrockhurstM. A. (2012). Plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer is a coevolutionary process. Trends Microbiol. 20, 262–267. 10.1016/j.tim.2012.04.003
8
HershbergR.PetrovD. A. (2010). Evidence that mutation is universally biased towards AT in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001115. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001115
9
HildebrandF.MeyerA.Eyre-WalkerA. (2010). Evidence of selection upon genomic GC-content in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001107. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001107
10
LawrenceJ. G.OchmanH. (1997). Amelioration of bacterial genomes: rates of change and exchange. J. Mol. Evol. 44, 383–397. 10.1007/PL00006158
11
LindP. A.AnderssonD. I. (2008). Whole-genome mutational biases in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 17878–17883. 10.1073/pnas.0804445105
12
LucchiniS.RowleyG.GoldbergM. D.HurdD.HarrisonM.HintonJ. C. (2006). H-NS mediates the silencing of laterally acquired genes in bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 2:e81. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020081
13
McCutcheonJ. P.MoranN. A. (2010). Functional convergence in reduced genomes of bacterial symbionts spanning 200 My of evolution. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 708–718. 10.1093/gbe/evq055
14
McCutcheonJ. P.MoranN. A. (2012). Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 13–26. 10.1038/nrmicro2670
15
MiraA.KlassonL.AnderssonS. G. (2002). Microbial genome evolution: sources of variability. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5, 506–512. 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00358-2
16
MiraA.OchmanH.MoranN. A. (2001). Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes. Trends Genet. 17, 589–596. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02447-7
17
MitchellD. (2007). GC content and genome length in Chargaff compliant genomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 353, 207–210. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.008
18
MoranN. A. (2002). Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell108, 583–586. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00665-7
19
MoranN. A.McCutcheonJ. P.NakabachiA. (2008). Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 165–190. 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119
20
MustoH.NayaH.ZavalaA.RomeroH.Alvarez-ValínF.BernardiG. (2006). Genomic GC level, optimal growth temperature, and genome size in prokaryotes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 347, 1–3. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.008
21
NavarreW. W.PorwollikS.WangY.McClellandM.RosenH.LibbyS. J.et al. (2006). Selective silencing of foreign DNA with low GC content by the H-NS protein in Salmonella. Science313, 236–238. 10.1126/science.1128794
22
NilssonA. I.KoskiniemiS.ErikssonS.KugelbergE.HintonJ. C. D.AnderssonD. I. (2005). Bacterial genome size reduction by experimental evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 12112–12116. 10.1073/pnas.0503654102
23
NishidaH. (2012a). Comparative analyses of base composition, DNA sizes, and dinucleotide frequency profiles in archaeal and bacterial chromosomes and plasmids. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2012, 342482. 10.1155/2012/342482
24
NishidaH. (2012b). Nucleosome positioning. ISRN Mol. Biol. 2012, 245706.
25
NishidaH. (2013). Genome DNA sequence variation, evolution, and function in bacteria and archaea. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 15, 19–24.
26
RochaE. P.DanchinA. (2002). Base composition bias might result from competition for metabolic resources. Trends Genet. 18, 291–294. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02690-2
27
RochaE. P.FeilE. J. (2010). Mutational patterns cannot explain genome composition: are there any neutral sites in the genomes of bacteria?PLoS Genet. 6:e1001104. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001104
28
SmitsW. K.GrossmanA. D. (2010). The transcriptional regulator Rok binds A+T-rich DNA and is involved in repression of a mobile genetic element in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001207. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001207
29
SongH.HwangJ.YiH.UlrichR. L.YuY.NiermanW. C.et al. (2010). The early stage of bacterial genome-reductive evolution in the host. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1000922. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000922
30
SørensenS. J.BaileyM.HansenL. H.KroerN.WuertzS. (2005). Studying plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: a critical review. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 700–710. 10.1038/nrmicro1232
31
SueokaN. (1988). Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 2653–2657.
32
SuzukiH.SotaM.BrownC. J.TopE. M. (2008). Using Mahalanobis distance to compare genomic signatures between bacterial plasmids and chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e147. 10.1093/nar/gkn753
33
TakedaT.YunC.-S.ShintaniM.YamaneH.NojiriH. (2011). Distribution of genes encoding nucleoid-associated protein homologs in plasmids. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 685015. 10.4061/2011/685015
34
ThomasS. H.WagnerR. D.ArakakiA. K.SkolnickJ.KirbyJ. R.ShimketsL. J.et al. (2008). The mosaic genome of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans strain 2CP-C suggests an aerobic common ancestor to the delta-Proteobacteria. PLoS ONE3:e2103. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002103
35
WangW.LiG.-W.ChenC.XieX. S.ZhuangX. (2011). Chromosome organization by a nucleoid-associated protein in live bacteria. Science333, 1445–1449. 10.1126/science.1204697
36
WuH.ZhangZ.HuS.YuJ. (2012). On the molecular mechanism of GC content variation among eubacterial genomes. Biol. Direct7, 2. 10.1186/1745-6150-7-2
37
YunC. S.SuzukiC.NaitoK.TakedaT.TakahashiY.SaiF.et al. (2010). Pmr, a histone-like protein H1 (H-NS) family protein encoded by the lncP-7 plasmid pCAR1, is a key global regulator that alters host function. J. Bacteriol. 192, 4720–4731. 10.1128/JB.00591-10
38
ZhaoX.ZhangZ.YanJ.YuJ. (2007). GC content variability of eubacteria is governed by the pol III alpha subunit. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 356, 20–25. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.02.109
Summary
Keywords
Bacterial genome size, Base Composition, Plasmids, Viruses, Mutation bias
Citation
Nishida H (2012) Evolution of genome base composition and genome size in bacteria. Front. Microbio. 3:420. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00420
Received
19 October 2012
Accepted
21 November 2012
Published
06 December 2012
Volume
3 - 2012
Edited by
Patrick S. G. Chain, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
Reviewed by
Patrick S. G. Chain, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
Copyright
© 2012 Nishida.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: ahn@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology, a specialty of Frontiers in Microbiology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.