Abstract
The Arctic seasonal snowpack can extend at times over a third of the Earth’s land surface. This chemically dynamic environment interacts constantly with different environmental compartments such as atmosphere, soil and meltwater, and thus, strongly influences the entire biosphere. However, the microbial community associated with this habitat remains poorly understood. Our objective was to investigate the functional capacities, diversity and dynamics of the microorganisms in snow and to test the hypothesis that their functional signature reflects the snow environment. We applied a metagenomic approach to nine snow samples taken over 2 months during the spring season. Fungi, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were predominant in metagenomic datasets and changes in community structure were apparent throughout the field season. Functional data that strongly correlated with chemical parameters like mercury or nitrogen species supported that this variation could be explained by fluctuations in environmental conditions. Through inter-environmental comparisons we examined potential drivers of snowpack microbial community functioning. Known cold adaptations were detected in all compared environments without any apparent differences in their relative abundance, implying that adaptive mechanisms related to environmental factors other than temperature may play a role in defining the snow microbial community. Photochemical reactions and oxidative stress seem to be decisive parameters in structuring microbial communities inside Arctic snowpacks.
INTRODUCTION
The cryosphere is defined as the portion of Earth where the water is in solid form (). It includes sea ice, freshwater ice, glaciers, ice sheets, permafrost, and snow cover. Snow, which can cover over one third of the terrestrial surface (), influences global energy and moisture budget and, thereby, influences climate (). Snow is also an interface between different biosphere compartments such as soil, aquifers, sea ice, and the atmosphere (Pomeroy and Brun, 2001; ; Schimel et al., 2004; Schmidt and Lipson, 2004). While the snowpack appears to be a critical component of the cryosphere, it is disappearing. The snow cover was estimated to be reduced by 17.8% in the Northern Hemisphere from 1979 to 2011 () and this reduction has influenced climate regulation and snow-covered ecosystems. However, the concept of the snowpack as an ecosystem itself remains largely unexplored and its ecological role has probably been underestimated ().
Snowpack is formed by the accumulation of deposited ice crystals that encountered post-depositional modifications (). In this cold porous media, microorganisms are subjected to environment-specific physical and chemical conditions, such as low nutrient concentrations, desiccation, freeze-thaw cycles, solar irradiation and therefore highly reactive photochemistry during summer and darkness during winter, in addition to low temperatures. Therefore, snow was not considered suitable to support life but only to trap microorganisms in a vegetative state before releasing them to other environments upon melting (), but this view is being challenged. Arctic snow microorganisms have been partially characterized using various culture dependent and independent approaches. Recent molecular approaches were based on the extraction of DNA from snow samples and the identification of specific functional genes, such as ribosomal genes (coding16S rRNA), and genes involved in mercury (Hg) resistance or nitrogen cycling (, ; ). Some potential active members of the microbial community were identified in Antarctic snow by sequencing cDNA retrotranscribed from extracted 16S rRNA (). These studies demonstrated that diverse microorganisms are present and potentially active in the snow with variable cell density and may be involved in various biological processes. However, details concerning activity and metabolic capabilities of snow microbial community remain limited.
If the Arctic snowpack is a functional ecosystem, then the microbial community inhabiting it should have functional genomic signatures related to their adaptation to the specific conditions specific of this environment. Several physiological adaptations have been described for microorganisms surviving under cold conditions based on psychrophilic microbial isolates (; ; ; ). Although the described increased membrane fluidity and synthesis of cold adapted enzymes are critical to life in the cold, other physical and chemical parameters might be equally critical in the Arctic snowpack. For example, photon-induced radiation is also a recognized cause of extreme conditions (Rothschild and Mancinelli, 2001). These photochemical reactions and the associated oxidative capacity have been described as playing a major role in snowpack chemistry (), but the impact on snow microbial community remains unknown. Our objective was to investigate the functional capacities, diversity and dynamics of the microorganisms in snow and to test the hypothesis that their functional signature reflects the snow environment. Our approach was to compare the annotated functional DNA sequences in the microbial community to other communities and to known gene families associated with different stresses such as oxidative stress in relation to high UV irradiance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
Sampling site and procedure is illustrated in Figure 1. Samples were taken during a 2008 springtime field campaign in Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard, Norway, 78°56′N, 11°52′E). Shallow pits (total snow pack depth of 45 cm at the beginning of the field season, snow melt from mid-May) were dug between April and June at the same sampling site with a 50 m2 perimeter with restricted access located along the south coast of the Kongsfjorden (please consult for a complete description of the samples). Surface (3 first cm) and basal snow samples (10 cm above the ground) were collected in three 3 L sterile sampling bags using a sterilized Teflon shovel. To avoid contaminating the snow, Tyvex® body suits and latex gloves were worn during sampling and gloves were worn during all subsequent sample handling. The nine samples chosen in this study for metagenomic analyses were representative of eight distinct groups defined by chemical and taxonomical analysis (). Snow chemistry was analyzed as described previously (). Briefly, total Hg was measured with a Tekran Model 2600 using USEPA method 1631 revision E and bioavailable Hg was determined using a mer-lux biosensor at the field laboratory. Samples for methylmercury and chemical analysis were shipped frozen to the laboratory in France where methylmercury was analyzed by purge and cryotrapping gas chromatography and inorganic ions and organic acids were measured by suppressed ion chromatography using a Dionex ICS 300. Chemical data are provided in Table 1.
FIGURE 1
Table 1
| Sample Number | SVN7 | SVN8 | SVN18 | SVN35 | SVN40 | SVN48 | SVN56 | SVN64 | SVN65 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.4 | 4.9 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| Mercury (ng L-1) | 40.7 | 1.9 | 58.5 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 7.7 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 3.3 |
| MeHg (pg L-1) | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | 0.5 | BDL | 0.2 |
| BioHg (ng L-1) | 6.7 | 1.6 | 7.3 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | NA | NA |
| MSA (μmol L-1) | BDL | BDL | BDL | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.6 | BDL | 0.6 |
| Chloride (μmol L-1) | 21456.5 | 156.1 | 623.3 | 107.8 | 30.7 | 37.4 | 51.4 | 54.9 | 1456.7 |
| Natrium (μmol L-1) | 19410.9 | 141.8 | 545.1 | 92.5 | 30.4 | 28.6 | 42 | 50.2 | 1258.2 |
| Bromide (μmol L-1) | 47.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 4.0 |
| Sulfate (μmol L-1) | 2105.6 | 11.6 | 64.2 | 9.6 | 38.8 | 13.7 | 11.4 | 0.5 | 76.4 |
| Ammonium (μmol L-1) | 50.7 | 1.3 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 6.9 | 4.3 | 7.2 | 1.4 | 14.2 |
| Potassium (μmol L-1) | 394.5 | 2.5 | 11.7 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 24.0 |
| Magnesium (μmol L-1) | 4341.5 | 32.0 | 129.5 | 20.5 | 6.8 | 5.5 | 11.2 | 3.5 | 276.1 |
| Calcium (μmol L-1) | 828.5 | 7.1 | 45.9 | 13.4 | 9.8 | 10.4 | 7.7 | 6.5 | 88.6 |
| Nitrate (μmol L-1) | 13.3 | 2.2 | 4 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 6.2 | 8.4 | BDL | 1.9 |
| Nitrite (μmol L-1) | BDL | 0.2 | 0.3 | BDL | BDL | BDL | 0.2 | BDL | BDL |
| AGly (μmol L-1) | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.6 |
Snow samples chemistry.
MeHG, methyl mercury; BioHG, bioavailable mercury (Schroeder et al., 1998); MSA, methyl sulfonic acid; Agly, acetate-glycolate; NA, not available; BDL, below detection limit).
MICROBIAL SAMPLE PROCESSING
Samples were processed immediately after collection in the field laboratory. Samples were left to melt at room temperature prior to being filtered onto sterile 0.22 μM 47 mm filters (Merck Millipore, Germany) using a sterile filtration unit (Nalge Nunc International Corporation, USA) and filters were stored in sterile bead-beating tubes at -20°C until further analysis. Procedural blanks were carried out by filtering Nanopure water (Siemens, Germany) using the same procedure.
DNA EXTRACTION
DNA was extracted using the protocol outlined in
PYROSEQUENCING
DNA extracted from environmental samples were sequenced by GATC (Constanz, Germany) using a Roche 454 Titanium pyrosequencer. Since the required DNA yield for pyrosequencing was 2 μg/50 μL, which could represent up to 1200 L of snow (DNA yield between 1.6 and 16 ng per L of snow), the DNA extracted from each sample was amplified using multiple displacement amplification with the illustraTM GenomiPhiTM HS DNA Amplification Kit (GE Healthcare, USA). Amplification was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions and purified by addition of 3.5 volumes of both RA1 and 70% ethanol followed by centrifugation on Nucleospin Tissue XS columns. Further washing was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Nucleospin, Machery-Nagel, Germany). No amplification was obtained using extractions carried out on field blanks.
SEQUENCE ANALYSIS
The fasta sequences obtained were filtered for errors using cd-hit, blasted against the NCBI-NR database using the BLASTX default settings (
RESULTS
SNOW METAGENOMES CHARACTERISTICS
Snow metagenomic datasets harbored on average 27,000 sequences with a length of 330 nucleotides. The smallest and the biggest datasets were obtained from the samples SVN65 (12,181 sequences) and SVN7 (42,989 sequences), respectively. Taxonomic annotation efficiency at a broad taxonomic level (phylum/classes) was high; with a proportion of unannotated reads varying between 5 and 12% of the total sequences. However, functional annotation efficiency was low; the percentage of reads with no occurrence with genes with known functions in the database varied between 60 and 88% (for SVN8 and SVN40, respectively). Detailed relative abundances of each functional or taxonomical group are directly available on MG-RAST software under the accession number indicated in Table S2. The raw metagenomic dataset can be also downloaded from the MG-RAST website.
FUNCTIONAL AND TAXONOMICAL DYNAMIC OF SNOWPACK MICROBIAL COMMUNITY
Fungi represented the taxon with highest amount of annotated sequence reads, followed by Bacteria with major phyla Bacteriodetes/Chlorobi (37%) and Proteobacteria (34%) (Figure 2). Cyanobacteria (Nostocales, Chroococcales) represented approximately 10% of the classes, except for in one surface snow sample from May 20th (SVN48). Archaea domain had the least amount of annotated reads and was only detected in the early season snow samples (SVN7, SVN8, SVN18). Some reads were similar to genomic sequences of species characterized as psychrophile or psychrotolerant with their highest relative abundance in basal samples and during late spring (sample SVN65). We observed variability in community structure from samples throughout the field season. Reads related to Fungi were dominant in surface snow metagenomes sampled between the 25th of April (SVN18) and the 27th of May (SVN56) and reached up to 70% of annotated reads in the sequenced sample from the 13th of May (SVN40). We also observed differences in community composition between surface and basal snow (SVN8 and SVN65), where reads annotated to bacteria from Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi, and Cyanobacteria were dominant relative to Fungi that were in relatively low annotated read abundance.
FIGURE 2

Comparison of the major phyla/classes (NCBI-Taxonomy in MEGAN) in all snow samples. Data is plotted as the percentage of sequence reads annotated to genomes within each phyla/class. The legend is classified in decreasing order of read numbers.
Sequence reads from the snow metagenomes were classified into metabolic functions using the SEED database Of the annotated reads, most were classified as carbohydrate metabolism genes (10–19%), followed by virulence, amino acid, protein, DNA, cell wall, cofactors, and respiration. The functional profile varied among snow samples. For example, the proportions of reads associated with virulence varied between 8.72% for the surface snow sample svn35 to up to 18.10% for the surface snow sample svn56 sampled 3 weeks later. Among virulence associated reads, the majority corresponded to antibiotic and toxic compound resistance, and pollutant biodegradation and reach up to 91% of the annotated reads in sequences from sample svn56. The chemical parameters measured in snow samples also varied between samples; surface versus basal samples and during the Spring season (Table 1). Detailed analyses of these abiotic data have been published in a previous article (
FIGURE 3

Heatmap from Pearson correlations between chemical data and the first 50 (in abundance) subsystems at the second level of seed classification. Functional subsystems are ordered from the most to the least abundant.
FUNCTIONAL SIGNATURE OF SNOWPACK MICROBIAL COMMUNITY
The relative abundance of annotated reads of functional subsystems was compared among different ecosystem metagenomic datasets referenced in Table S2: snowpack, polar microbial mats for samples corresponding to the cryosphere and soil (forest and grassland) together with oceans (coastal and open oceans) for mesophilic environments. All of the snow samples grouped together in the PCA of the functional read distributions and were separated from the other ecosystems (Figure 4). However, different snow samples from the same sampling site in Svalbard and from the same sampling season were more dispersed than samples collected for other environmental groups even those that included sequences from different sampling sites, time periods, extraction protocols, and sequencing technologies.
FIGURE 4

PCA based on the relative distribution of annotated sequences (E-value < 10-5) classified in different functional subsystems by MG-Rast software. Distributions were normalized as a function of the number of annotated sequences for each metagenome. The snow samples were compared to metagenomes from different ecosystems. PMM, polar microbial mats Arctic and Antarctic (Varin et al., 2012a,b); Roth, Rothamsted soil (
Several functional subsystems were more represented in terms of normalized read numbers in the snowpack than in sequences from other environments. All subsystems at the second level of seed classification that were more abundant in snow samples are listed in Table S2. As an example, we focused on four different subsystems, illustrated in Figure 5. For NAD/NADP metabolism, the proportion of reads represents on average 0.8% of annotated sequences and was significantly higher in snow samples (p-value 1.72 × 10-3). Proportions of reads associated with biosynthesis of galactoglycans and associated polysaccharides were also globally more elevated in early spring snow samples (up to 1.2%). In addition, the percentage of reads related to cyanobacterial circadian clock were significantly different among environments (p-value 1.05 × 10-3) with a greater representation in polar microbial mat and snow samples (0.13% of sequences on average for both). Bacterial hemoglobin associated reads also seem to be more represented in most snow samples despite the non-significant p-value 0.056 which is likely explained by snow sample heterogeneity. Among all functional subsystems, we also focused on those associated to cold-resistance mechanisms, whose distributions in the different environments are provided in Table S3. Although the associated genes were found in our snow samples, most of them were not statistically more represented in cryospheric environments (both snow and polar microbial mat) than in other environments. However, genes related to fatty acid desaturases and biosynthesis of galactoglycans that are involved in cold resistance were relatively more dominant in our snow samples and polar mats than in other ecosystems.
FIGURE 5

Relative distribution (in percentage of annotated sequences) of different functional subsystems (annotation with MG-Rast software). Distributions between different ecosystems were compared using multiple group analyses (ANOVA, Tukey–Kramer) in STAMP. PMM, polar microbial mats Arctic and Antarctic (Varin et al., 2012a,b), Roth, Rothamsted soil (
DISCUSSION
Snow is increasingly considered to be a diverse and active ecosystem, but the microbial community inhabiting this environment remains poorly understood (
Bacterial community composition of our snow samples had been analyzed in detail previously using a 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic microarray (
The relative abundance of functionally unannotated reads was very high in our snow metagenomes, illustrating the lack of environmental representatives in databases, especially from largely unexplored environments such as snowpacks. However, our preliminary data indicate that the Arctic snowpack harbors a specific functional signature based on gene annotation of sequenced DNA and that this functional potential is correlated to the varying environmental conditions during the spring season and with depth in the snowpack. We observed a correlation between specific functional gene abundance and chemical parameters. For example, Hg and bio-Hg were correlated to the subsystem tetrapyrroles in which most of the reads are associated with heme and siroheme biosynthesis and cobalamin and coenzyme B12 biosynthesis. Cobalamin has been shown to be involved in Hg methylation in sulfate-reducing bacteria (
CONCLUSION
This study explored the microbial community functional genes in the Arctic snowpack. This microbial community, including representative members associated with cold environments, underwent major changes during the Spring season. Functional data that correlated with chemical parameters supported the hypothesis that this variation in microbial community structure and function could be explained by fluctuations in environmental conditions. Moreover, in this study, we tested the occurrence of a specific functional signature from the snowpack microbial community. Intense UV-light irradiation might be a critical factor in defining the microbial ecology of the Arctic snowpack ecosystem. Further sampling during the dark period as well as metatranscriptomic and atmosphere comparison studies year round would help establish how microorganisms are selected in snowpack and the role of light as a major driver of snowpack microbial community structure and function.
Statements
Acknowledgments
Lorrie Maccario was supported in part by Region Rhone-Alpes. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial and logistic support provided by the Institut Polaire Emile Victor (IPEV). We also would like to thank Aurélien Dommergue from the glaciology laboratory (Grenoble – France) for the chemical analyses, Emmanuel Prestat and Sebastien Cécillon (Laboratoire Ampère Ecole Centrale de Lyon) for their help in bioinformatics analyses.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00413/abstract
REFERENCES
1
AltschulS. F.GishW.MillerW.MyersE. W.LipmanD. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool.J. Mol. Biol.215403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
2
Alvarez-MartinezC. E.LourençoR. F.BaldiniR. L.LaubM. T.GomesS. L. (2007). The ECF sigma factor sigma(T) is involved in osmotic and oxidative stress responses in Caulobacter crescentus.Mol. Microbiol.661240–1255. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06005.x
3
AmatoP.HennebelleR.MagandO.SancelmeM.DelortA.-M.BarbanteC.et al (2007). Bacterial characterization of the snow cover at Spitzberg, Svalbard.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.59255–264. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00198.x
4
BensonD. A.Karsch-MizrachiI.LipmanD. J.OstellJ.WheelerD. L. (2005). GenBank.Nucleic Acids Res.33D34–D38. 10.1093/nar/gki063
5
BonnerF. T.HughesM. N.PooleR. K.ScottR. I. (1991). Kinetics of the reactions of trioxodinitrate and nitrite ions with cytochrome d in Escherichia coli.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1056133–138. 10.1016/S0005-2728(05)80279-8
6
BowersR. M.LauberC. L.WiedinmyerC.HamadyM.HallarA. G.FallR.et al (2009). Characterization of airborne microbial communities at a high-elevation site and their potential to act as atmospheric ice nuclei.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.755121–5130. 10.1128/AEM.00447-09
7
CabiscolE.TamaritJ.RosJ. (2000). Oxidative stress in bacteria and protein damage by reactive oxygen species.Int. Microbiol.33–8.
8
CarpenterE. J.LinS.CaponeD. G. (2000). Bacterial activity in South Pole snow.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.664514–4517. 10.1128/AEM.66.10.4514-4517.2000
9
CasanuevaA.TuffinM.CaryC.CowanD. A. (2010). Molecular adaptations to psychrophily: the impact of “omic” technologies.Trends Microbiol.18374–381. 10.1016/j.tim.2010.05.002
10
ChoiS. C.ChaseT.BarthaR. (1994). Enzymatic catalysis of mercury methylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.601342–1346.
11
CloutierJ.PrévostD.NadeauP.AntounH. (1992). Heat and cold shock protein synthesis in arctic and temperate strains of rhizobia.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.582846–2853.
12
CowanD. A.TowL. A. (2004). Endangered antarctic environments.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.58649–690. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090811
13
DeAngelisK. M.AllgaierM.ChavarriaY.FortneyJ. L.HugenholtzP.SimmonsB.et al (2011). Characterization of trapped lignin-degrading microbes in tropical forest soil.PLoS ONE6:e19306. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019306
14
DeAngelisK. M.GladdenJ. M.AllgaierM.D’HaeseleerP.FortneyJ. L.ReddyA.et al (2010). Strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of metagenomic-based enzyme discovery in lignocellulolytic microbial communities.BioEnergy Res.3146–158. 10.1007/s12155-010-9089-z
15
DelmontT. O.MalandainC.PrestatE.LaroseC.MonierJ.-M.SimonetP.et al (2011a). Metagenomic mining for microbiologists.ISME J.51837–1843. 10.1038/ismej.2011.61
16
DelmontT. O.RobeP.ClarkI.SimonetP.VogelT. M. (2011b). Metagenomic comparison of direct and indirect soil DNA extraction approaches.J. Microbiol. Methods86397–400. 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.06.013
17
DelortA.-M.VaïtilingomM.AmatoP.SancelmeM.ParazolsM.MailhotG.et al (2010). A short overview of the microbial population in clouds: potential roles in atmospheric chemistry and nucleation processes.Atmos. Res.98249–260. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.07.004
18
DemingJ. W. (2002). Psychrophiles and polar regions.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.5301–309. 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00329-6
19
DerksenC.BrownR. (2013). Snow [in Arctic Report Card 2013].Available at: http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard
20
DinsdaleE. A.EdwardsR. A.HallD.AnglyF.BreitbartM.BrulcJ. M.et al (2008). Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes.Nature452629–632. 10.1038/nature06810
21
DomineF.AlbertM.HuthwelkerT.JacobiH.-W.KokhanovskyA. A.LehningM.et al (2008). Snow physics as relevant to snow photochemistry.Atmos. Chem. Phys.8171–208. 10.5194/acp-8-171-2008
22
DominéF.ShepsonP. B. (2002). Air-snow interactions and atmospheric chemistry.Science2971506–1510. 10.1126/science.1074610
23
FerreiraA.O’ByrneC. P.BoorK. J. (2001). Role of sigma(B) in heat, ethanol, acid, and oxidative stress resistance and during carbon starvation in Listeria monocytogenes.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.674454–4457. 10.1128/AEM.67.10.4454-4457.2001
24
FreyA. D.FarrésJ.BollingerC. J.KallioP. T. (2002). Bacterial hemoglobins and flavohemoglobins for alleviation of nitrosative stress in Escherichia coli.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.684835–4840. 10.1128/AEM.68.10.4835
25
GilbertJ. A.DaviesP. L.Laybourn-ParryJ. (2005). A hyperactive, Ca2+-dependent antifreeze protein in an Antarctic bacterium.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.24567–72. 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.022
26
GoretskiJ.ZafiriouO. C.HollocherT. C. (1990). Steady-state nitric oxide concentrations during denitrification.J. Biol. Chem.26511535–11538.
27
GrannasA. M.JonesA. E.DibbJ.AmmannM.AnastasioC.BeineH. J.et al (2007). An overview of snow photochemistry: evidence, mechanisms and impacts.Atmos. Chem. Phys.74329–4373. 10.5194/acp-7-4329-2007
28
GroudievaT.KambourovaM.YusefH.RoyterM.GroteR.TrinksH.et al (2004). Diversity and cold-active hydrolytic enzymes of culturable bacteria associated with Arctic sea ice, Spitzbergen.Extremophiles8475–488. 10.1007/s00792-004-0409-0
29
Gunde-CimermanN.SonjakS.ZalarP.FrisvadJ. C.DiderichsenB.PlemenitašA. (2003). Extremophilic fungi in arctic ice: a relationship between adaptation to low temperature and water activity.Phys. Chem. Earth281273–1278. 10.1016/j.pce.2003.08.056
30
HardingT.JungblutA. D.LovejoyC.VincentW. F. (2011). Microbes in high arctic snow and implications for the cold biosphere.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.773234–3243. 10.1128/AEM.02611-10
31
HinklerJ.HansenB. U.TamstorfM. P.SigsgaardC.PetersenD. (2008). Snow and snow-cover in central Northeast Greenland.Advan. Ecol. Res.40175–195. 10.1016/S0065-2504(07)00008-6
32
HusonD. H.AuchA. F.QiJ.SchusterS. C. (2007). MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data.Genome Res.17377–86. 10.1101/gr.5969107
33
HusonD. H.MitraS.RuscheweyhH.-J.WeberN.SchusterS. C. (2011). Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4.Genome Res.211552–1560. 10.1101/gr.120618.111
34
IhakaR.GentlemanR. (1996). R: a language for data analysis and graphics.J. Comput. Graph. Stat.5299–314. 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713
35
KondoT.StrayerC. A.KulkarniR. D.TaylorW.IshiuraM.GoldenS. S.et al (1993). Circadian rhythms in prokaryotes: luciferase as a reporter of circadian gene expression in cyanobacteria.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.905672–5676. 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5672
36
KrappA. R.HumbertM. V.CarrilloN. (2011). The soxRS response of Escherichia coli can be induced in the absence of oxidative stress and oxygen by modulation of NADPH content.Microbiology157957–965. 10.1099/mic.0.039461-0
37
KumarG. S.JagannadhamM. V.RayM. K. (2002). Low-temperature-induced changes in composition and fluidity of lipopolysaccharides in the antarctic psychrotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.J. Bacteriol.1846746–6749. 10.1128/JB.184.23.6746-6749.2002
38
LaroseC.BergerS.FerrariC.NavarroE.DommergueA.SchneiderD.et al (2010a). Microbial sequences retrieved from environmental samples from seasonal arctic snow and meltwater from Svalbard, Norway.Extremophiles14205–212. 10.1007/s00792-009-0299-2
39
LaroseC.DommergueA.De AngelisM.CossaD.AvertyB.MarusczakN.et al (2010b). Springtime changes in snow chemistry lead to new insights into mercury methylation in the Arctic.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta746263–6275. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.043
40
LaroseC.DommergueA.VogelT. (2013a). The dynamic arctic snow pack: an unexplored environment for microbial diversity and activity.Biology (Basel)2317–330. 10.3390/biology2010317
41
LaroseC.DommergueA.VogelT. M. (2013b). Microbial nitrogen cycling in Arctic snowpacks.Environ. Res. Lett.8:035004. 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035004
42
LaroseC.PrestatE.CecillonS.BergerS.MalandainC.LyonD.et al (2013c). Interactions between snow chemistry, mercury inputs and microbial population dynamics in an Arctic snowpack.PLoS ONE8:e79972. 10.1371/journal.pone.0079972
43
LionardM.PéquinB.LovejoyC.VincentW. F. (2012). Benthic cyanobacterial mats in the high arctic: multi-layer structure and fluorescence responses to osmotic stress.Front. Microbiol.3:140. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00140
44
LopatinaA.KrylenkovV.SeverinovK. (2013). Activity and bacterial diversity of snow around Russian Antarctic stations.Res. Microbiol.164949–958. 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.08.005
45
LundB. O.MillerD. M.WoodsJ. S. (1993). Studies on Hg(II)-induced H2O2 formation and oxidative stress in vivo and in vitro in rat kidney mitochondria.Biochem. Pharmacol.452017–2024. 10.1016/0006-2952(93)90012-L
46
MeyerF.PaarmannD.D’SouzaM.OlsonR.GlassE. M.KubalM.et al (2008). The metagenomics RAST server – a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes.BMC Bioinformatics9:386. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386
47
MitevaV. (2008). “Bacteria in snow and glacier ice,” inPsychrophiles: from Biodiversity to BiotechnologyedsMargesinR.SchinnerF.MarxJ.-C.GerdayC.(Berlin Heidelberg:Springer)31–50. 10.1007/978-3-540-74335-4_3
48
MøllerA. K.BarkayT.Abu Al-SoudW.SørensenS. J.SkovH.KroerN. (2011). Diversity and characterization of mercury-resistant bacteria in snow, freshwater and sea-ice brine from the High Arctic.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.75390–401. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01016.x
49
MøllerA. K.SøborgD. A.Abu Al-SoudW.SørensenS. J.KroerN. (2013). Bacterial community structure in High-Arctic snow and freshwater as revealed by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes and cultivation.Polar Res.32:17390. 10.3402/polar.v32i0.17390
50
MuellerD. R.VincentW. F.BonillaS.LaurionI. (2005). Extremotrophs, extremophiles and broadband pigmentation strategies in a high arctic ice shelf ecosystem.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.5373–87. 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.11.001
51
OverbeekR.BegleyT.ButlerR. M.ChoudhuriJ. V.ChuangH.-Y.CohoonM.et al (2005). The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes.Nucleic Acids Res.335691–5702. 10.1093/nar/gki866
52
PagetM. S.KangJ. G.RoeJ. H.ButtnerM. J. (1998). sigmaR, an RNA polymerase sigma factor that modulates expression of the thioredoxin system in response to oxidative stress in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).EMBO J.175776–5782. 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5776
53
ParksD. H.BeikoR. G. (2010). Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities.Bioinformatics26715–721. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq041
54
ParksJ. M.JohsA.PodarM.BridouR.HurtR. A.SmithS. D.et al (2013). The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation.Science3391332–1335. 10.1126/science.1230667
55
PolzM. F.AlmE. J.HanageW. P. (2013). Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of bacterial and archaeal population structure.Trends Genet.29170–175. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.12.006
56
PomeroyJ. W.BrunE. (2001). “Physical properties of snow,” inSnow Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Examination of Snow-Covered EcosystemsedsJonesH. G.PomeroyJ. W.WalkerD. A.HohamR. W.(New York, NY:Cambridge University Press)45–126.
57
PriscuJ. C.ChristnerB. C. (2004). “Earth’s icy biosphere,” inMicrobial Diversity and Bioprospectinged.BullA. T.(Washington, DC:American Society for Microbiology)130–145. 10.1128/9781555817770.ch13
58
RodriguesD. F.TiedjeJ. M. (2008). Coping with our cold planet.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.741677–1686. 10.1128/AEM.02000-07
59
RoosJ. C.VincentW. F. (1998). Temperature dependence of UV radiation effects on Antarctic cyanobacteria.J. Phycol.34118–125. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340118.x
60
RothschildL. J.MancinelliR. L. (2001). Life in extreme environments.Nature4091092–101. 10.1038/35059215
61
SchimelJ. P.BilbroughC.WelkerJ. M. (2004). Increased snow depth affects microbial activity and nitrogen mineralization in two arctic tundra communities.Soil Biol. Biochem.36217–227. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.09.008
62
SchmidtS. K.LipsonD. A. (2004). Microbial growth under the snow: implications for nutrient and allelochemical availability in temperate soils.Plant Soil2591–7. 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020933.32473.7e
63
SchmitzO. (2000). CikA, a bacteriophytochrome that resets the cyanobacterial circadian clock.Science289765–768. 10.1126/science.289.5480.765
64
SchroederW. H.AnlaufK. G.BarrieL. A.LuJ. Y.SteffenA.SchneebergerD. R.et al (1998). Arctic springtime depletion of mercury.Nature394331–332. 10.1038/28530
65
SegawaT.MiyamotoK.UshidaK.AgataK.OkadaN.KohshimaS. (2005). Seasonal change in bacterial flora and biomass in mountain snow from the Tateyama Mountains, Japan, analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and real-time PCR.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.71123–130. 10.1128/AEM.71.1.123
66
SimonC.DanielR. (2011). Metagenomic analyses: past and future trends.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.771153–1161. 10.1128/AEM.02345-10.
67
SimonC.WiezerA.StrittmatterA. W.DanielR. (2009). Phylogenetic diversity and metabolic potential revealed in a glacier ice metagenome.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.757519–7526. 10.1128/AEM.00946-09
68
SmithT.PittsK.McGarveyJ. A.SummersA. O. (1998). Bacterial oxidation of mercury metal vapor, Hg(0).Appl. Environ. Microbiol.641328–1332.
69
VaïtilingomM.DeguillaumeL.VinatierV.SancelmeM.AmatoP.ChaumerliacN.et al (2013). Potential impact of microbial activity on the oxidant capacity and organic carbon budget in clouds.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110559–564. 10.1073/pnas.1205743110
70
VarinT.LovejoyC.JungblutA. D.VincentW. F.CorbeilJ. (2012a). Metagenomic analysis of stress genes in microbial mat communities from Antarctica and the High Arctic.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78549–559. 10.1128/AEM.06354-11
71
VarinT.LovejoyC.JungblutA. D.VincentW. F.CorbeilJ. (2012b). Metagenomic analysis of stress genes in microbial mat communities from Antarctica and the High Arctic.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78549–559. 10.1128/AEM.06354-11
72
VölkerU.MaulB.HeckerM. (1999). Expression of the sigmaB-dependent general stress regulon confers multiple stress resistance in Bacillus subtilis.J. Bacteriol.1813942–3948.
73
WangG.MaierR. J. (2004). An NADPH quinone reductase of Helicobacter pylori plays an important role in oxidative stress resistance and host colonization.Infect. Immun.721391–1396. 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1391-1396.2004
Summary
Keywords
Arctic, snowpack, cryosphere, metagenomic, microbial adaptation
Citation
Maccario L, Vogel TM and Larose C (2014) Potential drivers of microbial community structure and function in Arctic spring snow. Front. Microbiol. 5:413. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00413
Received
20 May 2014
Accepted
21 July 2014
Published
07 August 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Brian D. Lanoil, University of Alberta, Canada
Reviewed by
Brent C. Christner, Louisiana State University, USA; Christine M. Foreman, Montana State University, USA
Copyright
© 2014 Maccario, Vogel and Larose.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Catherine Larose, CNRS UMR 5005, Environmental Microbial Genomics, Laboratoire Ampère, École Centrale de Lyon, Université de Lyon, 36 Avenue Guy de Collongue, 69134 Ecully, France e-mail: catherine.larose@ec-lyon.fr; website: www.GenomEnviron.org
This article was submitted to Extreme Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.