Abstract
Thymineless death (TLD) in bacteria has been a focus of research for decades. Nevertheless, the advances in the last 5 years, with Escherichia coli as the model organism, have been outstanding. Independent research groups have presented compelling results that establish that the initiation of chromosome replication under thymine starvation is a key element in the scenario of TLD. Here we review the experimental results linking the initiation of replication to the lethality under thymine starvation and the proposed mechanisms by which TLD occurs. The concept of this relationship was ‘in the air,’ but approaches were not sufficiently developed to demonstrate the crucial role of DNA initiation in TLD. Genome-wide marker frequency analysis and Two Dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis have been critical methods employed to reveal that initiation events and the degradation of the oriC region occur during thymine starvation. The relationships between these events and TLD have established them to be the main underlying causes of the lethality under thymine starvation. Furthermore, we summarize additional important findings from the study of different mutant strains, which support the idea that the initiation of chromosomal replication and TLD are connected.
Introduction
Thymineless death (TLD) is defined by the loss of viability that occurs in a culture of a thyA defective mutant strain when deprived of thymine (Figure 1A). It was first reported by Barner and Cohen 60 years ago (). In the ensuing 60 years a number of other laboratory groups have studied this phenomenon and have attempted to elucidate its mechanism. Throughout the years, TLD has been associated with DNA damage and DNA recombination structures, as well as their outcomes: SOS induction, filamentation, mutagenesis, loss of plasmids, or induction of suicide modules and prophages, among others (). However, the relative contribution of these factors, individually or in combination, to TLD remains unknown. A novel and critical aspect has emerged in the last 5 years: the initiation of chromosomal replication. Abortive events in attempted initiation during thymine starvation may be associated with the observed degradation of the oriC DNA sequence that eventually leads to TLD.
FIGURE 1
The goal of this minireview is to detail the experiments and various approaches that establish the initiation of replication as a key element in the continuously evolving story of TLD.
The Unbalanced Growth Model
The first general model to explain TLD was the recognition of unbalanced growth generated under thymine starvation (). Certainly, DNA replication eventually stops in thymine-starved cells, while the processes of DNA recombination and repair may continue (), and neither RNA nor protein synthesis are greatly affected (; ; ). Nevertheless, the notion of unbalanced growth was too vague, and it was shown that it cannot be the sole cause of TLD. Various experimental conditions suppressed TLD while maintaining an imbalance between DNA and protein synthesis. Examples of these conditions include the starvation of thymine in the presence of chloramphenicol () during which RNA synthesis remains active, or the heat inactivation of the proteins required for chromosomal initiation, DnaA or DnaC, () during which RNA and protein synthesis are not affected. None of these conditions would predict the suppression of TLD according to the unbalanced growth model.
TLD is Related to DNA Replication
Thymine is exclusively incorporated into DNA during the replication process; therefore, TLD has been associated for many years with DNA replication. Early observations described conditions under which TLD was suppressed in cells that had completed replication rounds (). Additionally, TLD has been shown to be affected differently under inactivation of several replication proteins (; ). Thus, a direct involvement of the chromosomal replication process in TLD is apparent.
TLD Correlates with the Number of Replication Forks, but they are Not Required to be Fully Active
A relationship between the magnitude of the lethality under thymine starvation and the number of replication forks has been well established. Both parameters were determined in the strain MG1693 thyA175 grown under various conditions to achieve different numbers of replication rounds per chromosome, n, (). Survival after thymine starvation (Figure 1A) was found to inversely correlate with n and the number of forks per cell, N, before thymine starvation (Figure 1B; ; ). However, it is not clear whether the activity of the replication forks is required for the lethality. TLD is not suppressed when thymine starvation is accomplished under conditions of DNA inhibition, such as the addition of hydroxyurea (; ; ; Figure 1A) or the incubation of a dnaBts mutant at 42°C (). Controversy has arisen because the two approaches used to inactivate the replication forks do not show a clear-cut inhibition of DNA synthesis (, ). Nevertheless, the complete absence of effect on TLD either after hydroxyurea addition or incubation of dnaBts at 42°C suggests that TLD is not dependent on the level of activity of the replication forks. Furthermore, the observation that the addition of hydroxyurea 10 min before thymine starvation does not change the kinetics of TLD supports this idea (Figure 1A; ; ).
DNA Fragmentation and Recombinant DNA Intermediates are Not Sufficient to Account for TLD
When considering the idea that the replication forks are targeted during thymine starvation, the primary assumption is that TLD results from DNA damage brought about by thymine starvation on its target. What effects could thymine starvation produce on the replication forks? Different models have suggested two primary sources of TLD that are not mutually exclusive: DNA breakage and DNA recombination intermediates, which have been associated either with RNA synthesis during thymine starvation () or to different recombination pathways such as RecA/RecBCD or RecFOR (; ).
DNA breakage has been observed under thymine starvation; thus, the occurrence of single-strand breaks (SSBs), DNA single-strand gaps (DNA ss-gaps; ), and double strand breaks (DSBs; ; ; ) have been shown to occur during thymineless incubation of bacteria. Furthermore, demonstrated the presence of DNA recombination intermediates, known as “non-migrating DNA” (nmDNA), in thymine-starved cells. Nevertheless, have shown that neither the number of DSBs nor the level of nmDNA correlated with TLD. DSBs appeared in the DNA of thymine-starved cells in the presence of rifampicin, a drug that prevents TLD. Thus, DSBs might be necessary but not sufficient to cause TLD. In addition, DNA recombination intermediates (nmDNA) were not observed under thymine starvation when hydroxyurea was present (). Because death still occurs under thymine starvation in the presence of hydroxyurea (Figure 1A), DNA recombination intermediates may be associated with, but are not essential for, TLD. Thus, what is the critical condition for TLD to occur?
Initiation of Replication is a Key Element in TLD
Although TLD has been associated for many years with replicating cells, and recent results have demonstrated a correlation between TLD and the number of replication forks, two results have suggested that additional components of the replication process are involved in TLD. First, TLD is suppressed by inhibiting RNA or protein synthesis, or both, as is observed in experimental conditions including the presence of rifampicin (; ; ) or chloramphenicol or in amino acid-starved cells (). Second, TLD is avoided by inactivating the DnaA protein (; ; ). The nexus between these three conditions (RNA and protein synthesis and the active form of DnaA protein) is their requirement at the initiation of replication. The inhibition of initiation by any of these treatments does not affect elongating replication forks, which can progress until the replication of the chromosome is completed. Thus, a correlation has been found between initiation of new replication rounds under thymine starvation and TLD. The causative link between DNA initiation and TLD has been established by several lines of evidence detailed below.
New Initiations Occur Under Thymine Starvation
The occurrence of new initiation events after restoring thymine to thymine-starved cells was first reported in the 1960s () and confirmed within the past 5 years (; ). Furthermore, it has been shown by different approaches that initiation events do occur during thymine starvation.
(i) Replication runouts – This approach is based on the ΔG and the ΔG′ values. Briefly, ΔG refers to the relative increase in the amount of DNA after the inhibition of new rounds of chromosome replication, a condition achieved by adding 150 μg ml-1 of rifampicin to an exponentially growing culture (; ). ΔG′ represents the relative increment of DNA in a culture subjected to 10 min of thymine starvation followed by restoration of thymine in the presence of 150 μg ml-1 of rifampicin to inhibit new initiations. Thus, if new initiations occur in the thymine-starved cells, then the ΔG′ value is expected to be higher than the ΔG value (). The results in Figure 2A show that the value of ΔG′ after the addition of thymine to 10-min thymine-starved cultures is higher than ΔG. These results show that new initiations occurred at a number of origins (i) under thymine starvation. Initiation events also occurred in the presence of hydroxyurea, but they were suppressed when the 10-min period of thymine starvation was performed in the presence of rifampicin or chloramphenicol. These results show a correlation between chromosomal initiation and lethality under thymine starvation (; ).
FIGURE 2
Furthermore, it was shown that the number of initiations at oriC increased with the amount of treatment time (Figure 2B), correlating with a loss of colony-forming units on solid medium (Figure 1A). Flow cytometry profiles of the replication runouts after thymine addition to cultures previously exposed to increasing time periods of thymine starvation indicated that only the thymineless-initiations that had occurred during the first 30 min could be repaired to allow complete chromosome replications ().
(ii) Visualization of the oriC replication intermediates under thymine starvation by 2D gels – The analysis of the replication fork progression at one specific position of the chromosome can be resolved by performing two-dimensional DNA gel electrophoresis (2D gels; ; ). The results with 2D gels show the different DNA structures that occur in the oriC region during thymine starvation (Figure 2C). The bubble arcs detected after 40 min indicate initiation events at oriC, while the double-Y structures are most likely produced by two forks encountering each other at oriC. These structures indicate that replication rounds are initiated during thymine starvation in the oriC region, although the possibility of initiations at different locations cannot be excluded. A simple-Y arc, corresponding to accumulated Y-shaped replication intermediates, was clearly detected after 10 min of thymine starvation. This indicates the arrest of replication forks within the oriC region and also strongly suggests that some initiations occur outside of the restriction fragment but still in the vicinity of oriC.
The experiments using the mutant strains confirmed the occurrence of initiation during thymine starvation. Consistent with the suppression of TLD, none of the DNA intermediates observed in wild type strains under TLD conditions were detected by 2D gels when initiations were inhibited by rifampicin or by DnaA inactivation (Figure 2C; ).
(iii) Copy number of oriC sequences increases during first 30 min under thymine starvation – The third approach providing evidence that new initiations occur during thymine starvation has been the quantification of the ori/ter ratio by performing either quantitative PCR () or Marker Frequency Analysis (dot-blot hybridization; ). The frequency of a gene along the chromosome, f(a), follows a function that depends upon the number of replication rounds per chromosome, n, and the position of the gene relative to the origin of replication, x, being f(a) = 2n(1-x) ().
Determination of the ori/ter ratio after 30 min of thymine starvation yielded a value higher than that obtained when the cells were growing exponentially (). The overall results show that thymineless-initiation events do occur. With the passage of time, the number of origins decreases, revealing a progressive loss of DNA in the oriC sequence (; ) as detailed below.
oriC is Degraded Under Thymine Starvation in a Rec-Dependent Manner
Marker Frequency Analysis on the scale of the whole chromosome by gene arrays is becoming the standard method of analyzing the replication pattern in bacteria. The results of the comparative genomic hybridization of chromosomal DNA after 3–4 h of thymine starvation revealed the loss of the oriC region (; ; Figure 2D). Furthermore, this conclusion is supported by the loss of oriC-containing foci during TLD, which was revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; ). An explanation for these observations could rely upon the degradation of the oriC region originated from DSBs nearby. An interesting question arises at this point: why and how is the oriC sequence preferentially degraded? One of the better-known triggers of chromosomal fragmentation is the incorporation of uracil into DNA. This occurs dut mutants, in such a way that the chromosome fragmentation exhibits a gradient that parallels the replication gradient (). Thus, it may be possible that the distinctive degradation of the oriC region is explained by the AT-rich feature of the oriC sequence, which could allow for a very significant incorporation of uracil in the absence of thymine.
Several defective repair/recombination mutant strains have been assayed for DNA damage impacting the oriC region (). These include those affecting enzymes that process and repair single-stranded gaps such a recFOR, recJ, or recQ. All of them are, to some extent, resistant to TLD and contain quantitatively lower origin DNA damage than in wild type strains (Figure 2E), thus connecting the extent of DNA damage at the oriC region to the lethality under thymine starvation. Interestingly, recA defective mutant starved for thymine for 4 h displayed an ori/ter ratio even higher than the initial value before treatment (; Figure 2D). RecA is a protein that plays a central role in homologous DNA recombination and repair. Nevertheless, it has been reported that either it is not required for TLD () or it may partially palliate it (; ). Thus, the reported absence of oriC degradation in a recA mutant during thymine starvation would support the alleviated TLD observed in the recA mutant (), consistent with the idea that TLD would depend on the origin degradation triggered by RecA-promoted recombinational misrepair.
The provocative exception is the feature exhibited by a recBC defective mutant, which has been described to be hypersensitive to TLD, although no oriC degradation is observed in this genetic background (, ). The RecBCD complex has both helicase and exonuclease activities, and it initiates the repair of DSBs by homologous recombination in combination with RecA protein (; ). Because recBC mutant cells do not degrade double-strand DNA ends and cannot repair DSBs, the TLD in this defective mutant likely could be related to its inability to repair DSBs at the original replication forks, even though the oriC region is not degraded (Figure 2D).
The Transcription-Dependent Step of Initiation is the Target for Rifampicin Suppression of TLD
Thymineless death suppression by rifampicin was observed in early studies (), but its mechanism of action has not yet been elucidated. This problem has been analyzed by two different approaches.
(i) The effects of different concentrations of rifampicin – It has been shown that the activity of the RNA polymerase in thymine-starved cells modulates both the initiation of DNA replication under thymine starvation and TLD (). Interestingly, suppression of TLD by rifampicin in a ΔdatA mutant was achieved when treated with 1,000 μg ml-1 of the drug but not with 150 μg ml-1 (). It has been suggested that in a ΔdatA strain, less RNA transcription around oriC would be required for initiation to occur because more DnaA protein would be available to open the oriC sequence during initiation in this mutant (). Accordingly, the ΔdatA strain initiates chromosome replication in the presence of 150 μg ml-1 rifampicin, explaining the observed TLD, while addition at 1,000 μg ml-1 completely inhibits the transcription requirement for initiation, hence suppressing TLD.
(ii) mioC and gid defective mutant strains – The importance of mioC and gid gene transcription for the initiation of chromosomal replication at oriC is widely accepted (; ). Nevertheless, neither the deletion of PmioC112 or Pgid113 promoters, nor the constitutive transcription from the mioCp9 promoter have a large effect on the cell cycle. However, reduction in initiation efficiency has been observed in rich medium (; ; ). Under thymine starvation, altered mioC and gid transcription limited the initiation process and TLD was alleviated (). The relevance of these results relies on the fact that TLD alleviation in these mutants must be related to the alteration of the normal transcription levels around oriC. This effect on TLD, combined with the broad reduction in chromosome initiation intermediates in these mutants (Figure 2C), strongly suggests that the transcription-dependent step of the initiation is the target for rifampicin suppression of TLD, hence being critical for TLD.
Conclusion
Overall, these experimental approaches pinpoint the initiations at the oriC region as the main targets for TLD in wild type strains. Thus, if DNA initiation is allowed under thymine starvation, death occurs likely due to the lethal consequences of the presence of DSBs, DNAss gaps, and DNA recombination intermediates at the origin that eventually result in oriC region degradation. If initiation is inhibited (dnaA46 mutant, rifampicin, chloramphenicol) or impaired (mioC, gid, ΔdatA, sub-inhibitory rifampicin concentrations), TLD is subsequently suppressed or alleviated, respectively. Thus, the observed correlation between TLD and the number of replication forks could reflect not only the importance of the forks as targets, but also the quantitative relationship between TLD, and the number of origins per chromosome, 2n.
Regarding thymineless-initiation events in thyA mutants that are otherwise wild type cells, the observations could be divided into two stages. During the first 30–60 min following thymine starvation the instability of DNA ss-gaps and the resulting DNA degradation behind the replication forks (and/or different source; ), might provide the dNTPs necessary to support new initiations, residual DNA elongation and the repair of the replication forks. According to the results from different authors, initiation events (supposed to occur at the first stage) are required to yield TLD, as lethality has not been observed in thymine-starved cells under conditions inhibiting DNA initiation.
The second stage would proceed after 30–60 min when the new thymineless-initiation events would generate unrepaired DSBs or DNAss gaps together with unresolved DNA recombination intermediaries at the origin, somehow triggering the unique degradation of the oriC region that acts as the major lethal effect of thymine starvation. Supporting this explanation, it also has been shown that the extent of origin degradation (supposed to occur at the second stage) correlates with the magnitude of TLD (). At this point, the role of the recombination/repair enzymes reflects the different sensitivities to thymine starvation described above. Accordingly, several independent pathways accounting for TLD has been proposed (; ; ) and also supported by Rosenberg’s lab (, ; ).
Several questions arise from this tentative model. The first one is whether new DNA initiation is a requisite for origin degradation. Second, what is the mechanism by which the oriC region is selectively degraded? Third, according to this proposal the DSBs located outside the origin region do not seem to be lethal or, alternatively, the inhibition of DNA initiation is counteracting their potentially lethal effect. Therefore, what is the mechanism of that phenomenon?
The advances in knowledge about TLD mechanisms have been impressive in the past 5 years. New technologies and approaches have evolved to provide novel insights, but TLD is still like a black hole – you know how you got into it but you never know where you will end up as time passes.
Statements
Acknowledgments
We wish to specially thank Phil Hanawalt, Arkady Khodursky, Alfonso Jiménez-Sánchez, and the reviewers for critically reading this manuscript, promoting constructive discussion and, especially to Andrei Kuzminov for providing such a wording suggestions. We thank the Servicio de Técnicas Aplicadas a la Biociencia (STAB) of the Universidad de Extremadura and Encarna Ferrera for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants GRU10058 from the Junta de Extremadura and BFU2007-63942 from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia to ECG.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AhmadS. I.KirkS. H.EisenstarkA. (1998). Thymine metabolism and thymineless death in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.52591–625. 10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.591
2
BakerT. A.KornbergA. (1988). Transcriptional activation of initiation of replication from the E. coli chromosomal origin: an RNA-DNA hybrid near oriC.Cell55113–123. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90014-1
3
BarnerH. D.CohenS. S. (1954). The induction of thymine synthesis by T2 infection of a thymine requiring mutant of Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.6880–88.
4
BatesD.BoyeE.AsaiT.KogomaT. (1997). The absence of effect of gid or mioC transcription on the initiation of chromosomal replication in Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9412497–12502. 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12497
5
BouvierF.SicardN. (1975). Interference of dna-ts mutations of Escherichia coli with thymineless death.J. Bacteriol.1241198–1204.
6
BrewerB. J.FangmanW. L. (1987). The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae.Cell51463–471. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90642-8
7
CourcelleJ. (2005). Recs preventing wrecks.Mutant. Res.557217–227. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.03.019
8
DillinghamM. S.KowalczykowskiS. C. (2008). RecBCD enzyme and the repair of Double-Stranded DNA Breaks.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.72642–671. 10.1128/MMBR.00020-08
9
FonvilleN. C.BatesD.HastingsP. J.HanawaltP. C.RosenbergS. M. (2010). Role of RecA and the SOS response in thymineless death in Escherichia coli.PLoS Genet.6:e1000865. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000865
10
FonvilleN.VaksmanZ.DeNapoliJ.HastingsP. J.RosenbergS. M. (2011). Pathways of resistance to thymineless death in Escherichia coli and the function of UvrD.Genetics18923–36. 10.1534/genetics.111.130161
11
GuarinoE.SalgueroI.Jiménez-SánchezA.GuzmánE. C. (2007). Double-strand break generation under deoxyribonucleotide starvation in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1895782–5786. 10.1128/JB.00411-07
12
HamiltonH. MWilsonR.BlytheM.NehringR. B.FonvilleN. C.LouisE. J.et al (2013). Thymineless death is inhibited by CsrA in Escherichia coli lacking the SOS response.DNA Repair (Amst)12993–999. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.08.011
13
HanawaltP. C. (1963). Involvement of synthesis of RNA in thymineless death.Nature198286. 10.1038/198286a0
14
HanawaltP. C.MaaløeO.CummingsD. J.SchaechterM. (1961). The normal DNA replication cycle. II.J. Mol. Biol.3156–165. 10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80042-9
15
Jiménez-SánchezA.GuzmánE. C. (1988). Direct procedure for the determination of the number of replication forks and the reinitiation fraction in bacteria.Comput. Appl. Biosci.4431–433.
16
KouzminovaE. A.KuzminovA. (2008). Patterns of chromosomal fragmentation due to uracil-DNA incorporation reveal a novel mechanism of replication-dependent double-stranded breaks.Mol. Microbiol.68202–215. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06149.x
17
KuongK. J.KuzminovA. (2009). Cyanide, peroxide and nitric oxide formation in solutions of hydroxyurea causes cellular toxicity and may contribute to its therapeutic potency.J. Mol. Biol.390845–862. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.038
18
KuongK. J.KuzminovA. (2010). Stalled replication fork repair and misrepair during thymineless death in Escherichia coli.Genes Cells15619–634. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01405.x
19
KuongK. J.KuzminovA. (2012). Disintegration of nascent replication bubbles during thymine starvation triggers RecA- and RecBCD-dependent replication origin destruction.J. Biol. Chem.28723958–23970. 10.1074/jbc.M112.359687
20
MaaloeO.HanawaltP. C. (1961). Thymine deficiency and the normal DNA replication cycle.I. J. Mol. Biol.3144–155. 10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80041-7
21
MartínC. M. (2014). Role of DNA Replication Initiation on the Lethality Caused by Thymine Starvation.Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de ExtremaduraBadajoz.
22
MartínC. M.GuzmánE. C. (2011). DNA replication initiation as a key element in thymineless death.DNA Repair (Amst.)1094–101. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.10.005
23
MartínC. M.VigueraE.GuzmánE. (2014). Rifampicin suppresses thymineless death by blocking the transcription-dependent step of chromosome initiation.DNA Repair1810–71. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.03.004
24
MesserW. (1972). Initiation of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in Escherichia coli B-r: chronology of events and transcriptional control of initiation.J. Bacteriol.1127–12.
25
MichelB.BoubakriHBaharogluZLeMassonMLestiniR. (2007). Recombination proteins and rescue of arrested replication forks.DNA Repair6967–980. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.016
26
MolinaF.Jiménez-SánchezA.ZyskindJ. W.GuzmánE. C. (1999). Chromosomal insertions localized around oriC affect the cell cycle in Escherichia coli.Biochimie81811–818. 10.1016/S0300-9084(99)00216-3
27
MorganrothP. A.HanawaltP. C. (2006). Role of DNA replication and repair in thymineless death in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1885286–5288. 10.1128/JB.00543-06
28
Morigen MolinaF.SkarstadK. (2005). Deletion of the datA site does not affect once-per-cell-cycle timing but induces rifampin-resistant replication.J. Bacteriol.1873913–3920. 10.1128/JB.187.12.3913-3920.2005
29
NakayamaH. (2005). Escherichia coli RecQ helicase: a player in thymineless death.Mutat. Res.577228–236. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.02.015
30
NakayamaH.HanawaltP. C. (1975). Sedimentation analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid from thymine-starved Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.121537–547.
31
NakayamaH.NakayamaK.NakayamaR.NakayamaY. (1982). Recombination-deficient mutations and thymineless death in Escherichia coli: reciprocal effects of recBC and recF and indifference of recA mutations.Can. J. Microbiol.28425–430. 10.1139/m82-064
32
NakayamaK.KusanoK.IrinoN.NakayamaH. (1994). Thymine starvation-induced structural changes in Escherichia coli DNA. Detection by pulsed field gel electrophoresis and evidence for involvement of homologous recombination.J. Mol. Biol.243611–620. 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90036-1
33
OkagakiH.TsubotaY.SibatainiA. (1960). Unbalanced growth and bacterial death in thymine-deficient and ultraviolet irradiated Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.80762–771.
34
PritchardR. H.LarkK. G. (1964). Induction of replication by thymine starvation at the chromosome origin inEscherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol.9288–307. 10.1016/S0022-2836(64)80208-4
35
SangurdekarD. P.HamannB. L.SmirnovD.SriencF.HanawaltP. C.KhodurskyA. B. (2010). Thymineless death is associated with loss of essential genetic information from the replication origin.Mol. Microbiol.751455–1467. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07072.x
36
SchwartzmanJ. B.Martínez-RoblesM. L.LópezV.HernándezP.KrimerD. B. (2012). 2D gel and their third-dimensional potential.Methods57170–178. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.03.013
37
SueokaN.YoshikawaH. (1965). The chromosome of Bacillus subtilis. I. Theory of marker frequency analysis.Genetics52747–757.
38
Su’etsuguM.EmotoA.FujimitsuK.KeyamuraK.KatayamaT. (2003). Transcriptional control for initiation of chromosomal replication in Escherichia coli: fluctuation of the level of origin transcription ensures timely initiation.Genes Cells8731–745. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00671.x
39
ZaritskyA.PritchardR. (1971). Replication time of the chromosome in thymineles mutants of Escherichia coli.J. Mol. Biol.6065–74. 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90447-5
Summary
Keywords
TLD, replication fork, initiation, oriC, rifampicin, DSBs, 2D gel DNA
Citation
Guzmán EC and Martín CM (2015) Thymineless death, at the origin. Front. Microbiol. 6:499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00499
Received
23 February 2015
Accepted
06 May 2015
Published
19 May 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited by
Arieh Zaritsky, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Reviewed by
Arkady Khodursky, University of Minnesota, USA; David Bates, Baylor College of Medicine, USA; Andrei Kuzminov, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Copyright
© 2015 Guzmán and Martín.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elena C. Guzmán, Departamento de Bioquímica Biología Molecular y Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz 06071, Spain eguzmac@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Microbial Physiology and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.