ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 08 February 2016

Sec. Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology

Volume 7 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00093

From Farm to Table: Follow-Up of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Throughout the Pork Production Chain in Argentina

  • Laboratorio de InmunoquĂ­mica y BiotecnologĂ­a, Centro de InvestigaciĂłn Veterinaria de Tandil – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas – ComisiĂłn de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires Tandil, Argentina

Abstract

Pigs are important reservoirs of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). The entrance of these strains into the food chain implies a risk to consumers because of the severity of hemolytic uremic syndrome. This study reports the prevalence and characterization of STEC throughout the pork production chain. From 764 samples, 31 (4.05%) were stx positive by PCR screening. At farms, 2.86% of samples were stx positive; at slaughter, 4.08% of carcasses were stx positive and at boning rooms, 6% of samples were stx positive. These percentages decreased in pork meat ready for sale at sales markets (4.59%). From positive samples, 50 isolates could be characterized. At farms 37.5% of the isolates carried stx1/stx2 genes, 37.5% possessed stx2e and 25%, carried only stx2. At slaughter we detected 50% of isolates positive for stx2, 33% for stx2e, and 16% for stx1/stx2. At boning rooms 59% of the isolates carried stx1/stx2, 14% stx2e, and 5% stx1/stx2/stx2e. At retail markets 66% of isolates were positive for stx2, 17% stx2e, and 17% stx1/stx2. For the other virulence factors, ehxA and saa were not detected and eae gene was detected in 12% of the isolates. Concerning putative adhesins, agn43 was detected in 72%, ehaA in 26%, aida in 8%, and iha in 6% of isolates. The strains were typed into 14 E. coli O groups (O1, O2, O8, O15, O20, O35, O69, O78, O91, O121, O138, O142, O157, O180) and 10 H groups (H9, H10, H16, H21, H26, H29, H30, H32, H45, H46). This study reports the prevalence and characterization of STEC strains through the chain pork suggesting the vertical transmission. STEC contamination originates in the farms and is transferred from pigs to carcasses in the slaughter process and increase in meat pork at boning rooms and sales markets. These results highlight the need to implement an integrated STEC control system based on good management practices on the farm and critical control point systems in the food chain.

Introduction

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are important foodborne pathogens that can cause severe disease, including a life-threatening complication such as bloody diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS; Paton and Paton, 1998). HUS is one of the most common etiologies for acute kidney injury and an important cause of acquired chronic kidney disease in children (Grisaru, 2014). This damage is produced by the action of cytotoxins Stx1 and Stx2, being Stx2 and their subtypes associated more frequently with HUS (Beutin et al., 2007). The ability to adhere to epithelial cells is an important virulence trait, because adherence presumably enables to deliver toxins efficiently to host organs (Tarr et al., 2000). Intimin, encoded by eae gene, is required for intimate bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells inducing a characteristic histopathological lesion defined as “attaching and effacing” (A/E) and has been considered as a risk factor for disease in human (Ethelberg et al., 2004). However, the presence of eae would not be essential for pathogenesis, considering that some eae negative STEC have been associated with severe disease in human (Paton et al., 2001). Some studies reported adherence factors other than intimin, such as Saa (Paton et al., 2001), AIDA and Agn43 (Restieri et al., 2007), EhaA (Wu et al., 2010), Iha (Tarr et al., 2000; Szalo et al., 2002). AIDA was identified in diffusely adhering diarrheagenic E. coli strain and is associated with edema disease and diarrhea in pigs (Niewerth et al., 2001), contributing to bacterial intercellular aggregation and biofilm formation (Restieri et al., 2007); iha encode for an outer membrane protein identified as a bacterial adherence conferring iron regulated gene (Tarr et al., 2000) and Agn43 and EhaA are autotransporter proteins of O157:H7 involved in adhesion and biofilm formation (Wells et al., 2008). Other factors are also involved in human pathogenicity such as a plasmid that encoded enterohemolysin (EhxA), among others (Feng and Reddy, 2013).

Argentina, where the HUS is endemic, hold the highest record worldwide of this syndrome with an incidence of 17/100,000 children less than 5 years old (Rivas et al., 2010). Although STEC O157:H7 is recognized as the most important serotype associated with human infection, there are more than 400 non-O157 serotypes that have been involved in human disease and isolated from different reservoirs including cattle, pigs, goats, sheep, cats, and dogs (Parma et al., 2000; Padola et al., 2004; Amézquita-López et al., 2014). STEC usually do not produce disease in animals, however, the Stx2e subtype is involved in edema disease in pigs, a peracute toxemia characterized by vascular necrosis, edema, neurological signs and that in some cases can be fatal (Niewerth et al., 2001). STEC strains have been isolated from pork products and have been associated with human infections as diarrhea and HUS, including strains harboring stx2e subtype (Sonntag et al., 2005; Kaufmann et al., 2006; Trotz-Williams et al., 2012); however, it is unknown if the contamination of pork- derivate food occurs during the processing or by cross contamination (Tseng et al., 2014).

There is an increase in worldwide demand for fast-growing species with efficient feed conversion rates, such as pigs, because they represent a major share in the growth in the livestock subsector (Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO], 2014). Because of the limited epidemiologic data of STEC in pork and the increasing role of non-O157 STEC in human illnesses, it is very important to study the role of pigs as reservoirs of STEC and the transmission to the swine production chain (Ercoli et al., 2015). Taking into account the data mentioned above, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and to characterize STEC throughout the pork production chain in Argentina.

Materials and Methods

Management of Farms and Animals

The study was conducted in two pig production farm systems. Both farms are intensively organized in total confinement. The production stages are: gestation, farrowing, weaning, and growing/finishing (fattening), which are geographically separated from each other within the same farm. The usual group size varies between 10 and 30 pigs. Pigs and employees move from one building to others by corridors that are isolated from external traffic.

Management of Carcasses Until Retails Markets

Pigs at finishing stage are transported to the slaughterhouses. After slaughtered, the pork carcasses are chilled during 24 to 48 h and sent to boning rooms in refrigerated trucks.

At the boning rooms the carcasses were boning to products such as meat and minced meat. Finally, the products are transferred to the retails markets.

Collection of Samples

Seven hundred and sixty four samples were collected from May, 2012 to November, 2014 from two pig production systems.

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Animal Welfare Committee from the Veterinary Science Faculty, UNCPBA, Resolution 087/02.

Samples at Farms

Three hundred and forty eight samples were taken at farms. From these, 277 corresponded to rectal swabs, and 71 come from the environment obtained from water drink, feed and feces on the floor by swabbing.

Samples at Slaughterhouses

One hundred and forty seven samples were by swabbing. Off these, 22 were from rectal swabs after slaughter, 85 from carcasses, and 40 from the slaughterhouses environment (pre-washing, scalding, deharing, dressing, cooling, and knives).

Carcasses swabs were taken in concordance with circular No 3496/02 of Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASA, 2002). Five quarters areas of 100 cm2 each one were taken and processed separately, they are named heads (H), external rectum (ER), internal rectum (IR), external thoracic (ET), and internal thoracic (IT; Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Samples at Boning Rooms

One hundred and eighty one samples were taken. From these, 94 come from carcasses, 24 from meat, 23 from minced meat, and 40 from environmental samples (refrigerated trucks and meat contact surfaces such as meat tables, knives, meat mincing machine, and vertical band saw machine).

Sampling at Retail Markets

Eighty seven samples were taken from retail markets (43 samples come from meat, 13 from minced meat, and 31 from the environment). The environmental samples were obtained from meat tables, knives, vertical band saw machine, and refrigerators.

Sample Preparation and Isolation of STEC

Swabs were processed according to Etcheverría et al. (2010). Briefly, the swabs were cultured in Luria Bertani broth (LB) with shaking at 37°C for 18 h, and then an aliquot was grown on MacConkey agar plates by incubating at 37°C for 24 h.

Ten to fifty individual colonies were processed for amplification of Shiga toxin genes (stx1, stx2, and stx2e; Table 1). Each positive colony for either stx was tested for the presence of the eae, ehxA, and saa by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Paton and Paton, 2002). Genes encoding adhesins (ehaA, agn43, iha, aida) were amplified using monoplex PCR. STEC strains used as positive control were E. coli O157:H7 EDL933 (stx1, stx2, eae, ehxA, ehaA, agn43, iha), E. coli O8 (stx2e), E. coli O91:H21 (stx1, stx2, ehxA, saa), and E. coli O157:H19 (aida).

Table 1

GenePrimers sequences (5′-3 ′)Size of amplified product (bp)Reference
stx1stx1F-ATAAATCGCCATTCGTTGACTA180Paton and Paton, 1998
stx1R-AGAACGCCCACTGAGATCATC
stx2stx2F-GGCACTGTCTGAAACTGCTCC255Paton and Paton, 1998
stx2R-TCGCCAGTTATCTGACATTCTG
stx2evt23F- CCGTCAGGACTGTCTGAAAC663Woodward et al., 1992
vt24R- GGACGCGATAATTAAACCG
eaeeaeF-GACCCGGCACAAGCATAAGC384Paton and Paton, 1998
eaeR-CCACCTGCAGCAACA-AGAGG
ehxAhlyAF-GCATCATCAAGCGTACGTTCC534Paton and Paton, 1998
hlyAR-AATGAGCCAAGCTGGTTAAGCT
saasaaDF-CGTGATGAACAGGCTATTGC-119Paton and Paton, 1998
saaDR-ATGGACATGCCTGTGGCAAC
agn43agn43F-CTGGAAACCGGTCTGCCCTT433Restieri et al., 2007
agn43R-CCTGAACGCCCAGGGTGATA
aidaaida1FACAGTATCATATGGAGCCACTC587Restieri et al., 2007
aida1R-TGTGCGCCAGAACTATTAATGG
ehaAehaAF-AGGCATGAGACACGATC500Wu et al., 2010
ehaAR-d AAGTCGTGCCATTGAGC
ihaihaF-CAAATGGCTCTCTTCCGTCAATGC925Szalo et al., 2002
ihaR-CAGGTCGGGGTTACCAAGT

Genes, primers sequences, and size of amplified product of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC).

Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel containing 0.8 ÎĽg/ml of ethidium bromide in running buffer and were visualized by UV transillumination.

Determination of Serotype

O and H types were determined by microagglutination technique in plates and tubes as described by Guinée et al. (1981) and modified by Blanco et al. (1996) using all available O (O1–O175) antisera plus six putative new O antigens (OX176 through OX181) and H (H1–H56) antisera (Pradel et al., 2000).

Results

The results indicate that STEC occurrence is widespread throughout pork production chain. Among the 764 samples, 31 (4.05%) were positive for stx. In rectal swabs from the different pig categories, 2.86% were STEC positive, distributed 5.88% at fattening, 4.3% at growing, 2.38% at gestation and 1.51% at farrowing. STEC were not detected in feed, water, and fecal samples taken from farms. At slaughter, 4.08% of carcasses sampled were stx positive. The distribution in the different quarters of the carcasses was: 50% from ER, 16.6% from ET, 16.6% from IT, 16.6 % from heads. At boning rooms, 6% of samples were STEC positive, belonging 82% to carcasses, and 18% to pork meat. The distribution in the different quarters of the carcasses was: 33.3% from ER, 22.2% from IR, 22.2% from IT, 11.2% from ET and 11% from head. At sale markets 4.59% of STEC positive samples were detected in pork meat ready for sale.

Characterization of STEC

From positive samples, 50 isolates could be characterized by PCR. In samples from farms 6/16 (37.5%) of the isolates carried stx1/stx2, 6/16 (37.5%) possessed stx2e, and 4/16 (25%) carried stx2. At slaughter 3/6 (50%) of isolates were positive for stx2, 2/6 (33%) for stx2e, and 1/6 (16%) for stx1/stx2. At boning rooms 13/22 (59%) of the isolates carried stx1/stx2, 3/22 (14%) stx2e, and 1/22 (5%) stx1/stx2/stx2e. At retail markets 4/6 (66%) of isolates were positive for stx2, 1/6 (17%) for stx2e, and 1/6 (17%) for stx1/stx2. Other virulence factors such as ehxA and saa were not detected and eae was detected in 6/50 (12%) of samples. Concerning putatives adhesins, agn43 was detected in 36/50 (72%), ehaA in 13/50 (26%), aida in 4/50 (8%), and iha in 3/50 (6%) of isolates. The most frequent virulence profiles found were stx1, stx2, or stx2e combined with agn43 in 36 (72%) strains. The 50 isolates were typed into 14 E. coli O groups (O1, O2, O8, O15, O20, O35, O69, O78, O91, O121, O138, O142, O157, O180) and 15 were considered O non-typable (NT). Ten H antigens (H9, H10, H16, H21, H26, H29, H30, H32, H45, H46) were distributed among the 50 strains, while one isolate were non-motile (H–). Table 2 indicates the relationships between virulence profiles, sites of samples and serotypes in isolated STEC strains.

Table 2

Sample siteSerotypesNo. of strainsVirulence profile
Farms (pigs)
GestationO1:HNM1stx1
GestationO1:HNM1stx1,stx2, agn43, ehaA
FatteringO2:H323stx2, agn43
Growing and FarrowingO8:H94stx2e, agn43
FatteringO20:H91stx2, agn43
FatteringO142:H261stx2
FatteringONT:H161stx2e, agn43, iha
FatteringONT:H261stx1,stx2, agn43
FatteringONT:H321stx2e, agn43, ehaA
GrowingONT:HNM1stx2e, agn43
FatteringONT:HNM1stx1,stx2, agn43
Slaugtherhouse
HO1:H91st2xe, ehaA
ERO91:H211stx1, agn43, ehaA, iha
ERONT:H291stx1,stx2
ERONT:HNM1stx2
ET and ITO8:HNM2stx2e, ehaA
Boning rooms
ETO8:HNM1stx2
ERO15:H452stx1,stx2,ehaA
IRO35:H101stx1,stx2, agn43
ETO69:HNM1stx1,stx2, agn43
HO78:H453stx1,stx2, agn43
HO78:HNM2stx1,stx2,agn43
ETO121:H211stx2e
ETO138:H301stx2e
IT and meatO157:H214stx2, eae, aida, agn43, ehaA
ETO180:H211stx1,stx2
ETONT:H211stx1,stx2
MeatONT:H212stx2e, agn43
IRONT:H321stx1,stx2, agn43
ITONT:HNM1stx2, stx2e, eae, agn43
Sale markets
MeatO9:H211stx2, agn43
MeatO9:HNM2stx2, agn43
MeatONT:H211stx2e, agn43
MeatONT:HNM1stx2, sxt2e, agn43
meatONT:HNM1stx2, stx2e, eae, agn43

Relationships between virulence profiles, sites of samples, and serotypes in STEC strains.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first that reports the prevalence and characterization of STEC strains through the chain pork suggesting the vertical transmission of these pathogens. However, there are studies that demonstrate the prevalence in farms, finishing pigs, slaughter, and pork meat in sales markets, separately. The prevalence of STEC in pigs, carcasses, and pork meat at different stage of production from other countries is variable and it is necessary to take caution when comparing prevalence since the variation may be due to several factors, such as sampling method, samples processing, and season in which the study was performed. Different prevalence of STEC in pigs was reported previously, ranged from 2 to 31%, in agreement with our results (Parma et al., 2000; Kaufmann et al., 2006; Meng et al., 2014). In carcasses at slaughter and boning rooms, the prevalence found is in concordance with other studies whose prevalence ranged from 0.2 to 26% (Leung et al., 2001; Bouvet et al., 2002; Bohaychuk et al., 2011; Koláčková et al., 2014).

At slaughter some operations such as skinning, evisceration and handling are more likely than others to contaminate carcass and meat (Koohmaraie et al., 2005; EtcheverrĂ­a et al., 2010). For this, some areas of carcasses are more prone than others to be exposure to potential or cross contamination, thus the suggestion of sampling at three or four sites on carcass, because contamination appears to vary considerably among different sites (Roberts et al., 1984). In addition, the ER is the area that involves a particular risk of contamination during early stages of dressing as our result in that the ER was the more contaminated area, in concordance with Bouvet et al. (2002). However, other areas sampled as IT and IR shown more contamination probably due to handling at the boning room.

In our study, the prevalence at sale market was less than that informed by Magwedere et al. (2013) in USA (50%), Martin and Beutin (2011) in Germany (14%) and Lee et al. (2009) Korea (15%). This could be due because these studies were performed in sale markets where meat from different origins were sold and cross contamination during handling can occur. In the present study the samples were obtained from sale markets where only meat pork was sold.

From 50 STEC isolates, stx1/stx2 and stx2 occurred more frequently than isolates carrying stx1. Epidemiologically, Stx2-producing strains are more often related with HUS than strains that produce Stx1 (Paton and Paton, 2002).

Regarding stx2e, its prevalence decreased from pigs at farms to pork meat. Although some authors have reported the presence of stx2e in STEC strains in human patients on a few occasions, STEC harboring stx2e are more likely to cause edema disease in pigs causing economic losses in pig production (Kaufmann et al., 2006). It is necessary to determine a rol of these strains in human infection.

The presence of eae detected in isolates that harbor too stx2, stx2e, agn43 from boning rooms and sale markets implies a high risk for human health (Tseng et al., 2014). The most prevalent adhesin identified among all isolates and involved in adhesion and biofilm formation was Agn43, followed by EhaA in agreement with Biscola et al. (2011) and Tseng et al. (2014) which detected them in swine and different sources, respectively. In this study, 8% of strain harbored AIDA, similar to that found in South Africa (Mohlatlole et al., 2013) and China (Zhao et al., 2009). The iha was present in few isolates, but this gene has been detected over 70% of the eae-negative STEC strains associated with human clinical cases examined in studies in Germany (Hauser et al., 2013) and Argentina (Galli et al., 2010). The high prevalence of LEE negative STEC isolated from pigs in our study emphasizes the need of further work to better define the role that the attachment proteins outside the LEE may play in the adherence to both pork and human epithelial cells.

Although many serotypes isolated in this study have been detected with low incidence in human disease and rarely associated with outbreaks (Friedrich et al., 2002), they have been isolated from pigs, sheep, cattle and food in other countries (Beutin et al., 1993; Kaufmann et al., 2006; Beutin et al., 2007). At slaughter and boning rooms serogroups associated with human illnesses such as E. coli O91, O121, and O157 were detected in agreement with other studies that recovered these serogroups from pig fecal samples (Desrosiers et al., 2001; Friedrich et al., 2002; Karmali et al., 2003; Bielaszewska et al., 2009; Trotz-Williams et al., 2012; Yoon et al., 2013; Tseng et al., 2014).

Conclusion

The presented study investigated the tracking of STEC from the farm to table and indicates that the production of meat pork harbored STEC strains. STEC contamination originated in the farms is transferred from pigs to carcasses in the slaughter process and increase in meat pork at boning rooms and sales markets. Besides, the entrance of these strains into the food chain implies a risk to consumers because of severity of the illness they can cause. If STEC is present in any food product, it has the possibility of causing foodborne illness. In addition to public health problem, the presence of strains carrying the stx2e gene is a problem for the pig production because they can cause the edema disease causing important economic losses. In spite of the wealth of data available on this important disease, it is necessary to effectively prevent this contamination by educating employees, retailers and consumers on the appropriate handling and storage of meat. Further studies are needed to provide more systematic data in order to fuel the development of novel approaches for control of STEC in foods, including pork meat.

Statements

Author contributions

RC conceived, designed, analyzed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. MR, MS, and MC did some of the experiments. NP and AE designed some of the experiments, analyzed the data, and revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Guillermo Arroyo for their collaboration during sampling collection, MarĂ­a Rosa Ortiz for her technical assistance. This work was supported by PICT 2010-1655, CIC, and SECAT from Argentina.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    Amézquita-LópezB. A.QuiñonesB.LeeB. G.ChaidezC. (2014). Virulence profiling of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli recovered from domestic farm animals in Northwestern Mexico.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.4:7. 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00007

  • 2

    BeutinL.GeierD.SteinrückH.ZimmermannS.ScheutzF. (1993). Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin)-producing Escherichia coli in seven different species of healthy domestic animals.J. Clin. Microbiol.312483–2488.

  • 3

    BeutinL.MikoA.KrauseG.PriesK.HabyS.SteegeK.et al (2007). Identification of human-pathogenic strains of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from food by a combination of serotyping and molecular typing of Shiga toxin genes.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.734769–4775. 10.1128/AEM.00873-07

  • 4

    BielaszewskaM.StoeweF.FruthA.ZhangW.PragerR.BrockmeyerJ.et al (2009). Shiga toxin, cytolethal distending toxin, and hemolysin repertoires in clinical Escherichia coli O91 isolates.J. Clin. Microbiol.472061–2066. 10.1128/JCM.00201-09

  • 5

    BiscolaF. T.AbeC. M.GuthB. E. C. (2011). Determination of adhesin gene sequences in, and biofilm formation by, O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from different sources.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.772201–2208. 10.1128/AEM.01920-10

  • 6

    BlancoJ. E.BlancoM.BlancoJ.MoraA.BalaguerL.MourinoM.et al (1996). O serogroups, biotypes, and eae genes in Escherichia coli strains isolated from diarrheic and healthy rabbits.J. Clin. Microbiol.343101–3107.

  • 7

    BohaychukV. M.GenslerG. E.BarriosP. R. (2011). Microbiological baseline study of beef and pork carcasses from provincially inspected abattoirs in Alberta. Canada.Can. Vet. J.521095.

  • 8

    BouvetJ.MontetM.RosselR.Le RouxA.BavaiC.Ray-GueniotS.et al (2002). Prevalence of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) and E. coli O157: H7 in French pork.J. Appl. Microbiol.937–14. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01672.x

  • 9

    DesrosiersA.FairbrotherJ. M.JohnsonR. P.DesautelsC.LetellierA.QuessyS. (2001). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli verotoxin-producing isolates from humans and pigs.J. Food Prot.641904–1911.

  • 10

    ErcoliL.FarnetiS.RanucciD.ScuotaS.BranciariR. (2015). Role of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the swine production chain.Ital. J. Food Saf.451–56. 10.4081/ijfs.2015.5156

  • 11

    EtcheverríaA.PadolaN.SanzM.PolifroniR.KrügerA.PassucciJ.et al (2010). Occurrence of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) on carcasses and retail beef cuts in the marketing chain of beef in Argentina.Meat Sci.86418–421. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.027

  • 12

    EthelbergS.OlsenK.ScheutzF.JensenC.SchiellerupP.EnbergJ.et al (2004). Virulence factors for hemolytic uremic syndrome, Denmark.Emerg. Infect. Dis.10842–847. 10.3201/eid1005.030576

  • 13

    FengP. C.ReddyS. (2013). Prevalences of Shiga toxin subtypes and selected other virulence factors among Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from fresh produce.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.796917–6923. 10.1128/AEM.02455-13

  • 14

    Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO] (2014). Pigs and Animal Production [Online]. Available at: http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/pigs/production.html[Accessed December 10 2014]

  • 15

    FriedrichA. W.BielaszewskaM.ZhangW.-L.PulzM.KucziusT.AmmonA.et al (2002). Escherichia coli harboring Shiga toxin 2 gene variants: frequency and association with clinical symptoms.J. Infect. Dis.18574–84. 10.1086/338115

  • 16

    GalliL.MiliwebskyE.IrinoK.LeottaG.RivasM. (2010). Virulence profile comparison between LEE-negative Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains isolated from cattle and humans.Vet. Microbiol.143307–313. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.11.028

  • 17

    GrisaruS. (2014). Management of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children.Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis.7231–239. 10.2147/IJNRD.S41837

  • 18

    GuinéeP.JansenW.WadströmT.SellwoodR. (1981). “Escherichia coli associated with neonatal diarrhoea in piglets and calves,” in Laboratory Diagnosis in Neonatal Calf and Pig DiarrhoeaVol. 13edsde LeeuwP. W.GuinéeP. A. M. (Dordrecht: Springer), 126–162.

  • 19

    HauserE.MellmannA.SemmlerT.StoeberH.WielerL. H.KarchH.et al (2013). Phylogenetic and molecular analysis of food-borne shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.792731–2740. 10.1128/AEM.03552-12

  • 20

    KarmaliM. A.MascarenhasM.ShenS.ZiebellK.JohnsonS.Reid-SmithR.et al (2003). Association of genomic O island 122 of Escherichia coli EDL 933 with verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli seropathotypes that are linked to epidemic and/or serious disease.J. Clin. Microbiol.414930–4940. 10.1128/JCM.41.11.4930-4940.2003

  • 21

    KaufmannM.ZweifelC.BlancoM.BlancoJ.BlancoJ.BeutinL.et al (2006). Escherichia coli O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli in fecal samples of finished pigs at slaughter in Switzerland.J. Food Prot.69260–266. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-579

  • 22

    KoláčkováI.HázováK.SkočkováA.KarpíškováR. (2014). [Occurrence of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli strains in pigs and cattle at slaughterhouses in the Czech Republic in 2013.].Klin. Mikrobiol. Infekc. Lek.2036–39.

  • 23

    KoohmaraieM.ArthurT.BosilevacJ.GueriniM.ShackelfordS.WheelerT. (2005). Post-harvest interventions to reduce/eliminate pathogens in beef.Meat Sci.7179–91. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.012

  • 24

    LeeG. Y.JangH. I.HwangI. G.RheeM. S. (2009). Prevalence and classification of pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from fresh beef, poultry, and pork in Korea.Int. J. Food Microbiol.134196–200. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.06.013

  • 25

    LeungP.YamW.NgW.PeirisJ. (2001). The prevalence and characterization of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and pigs in an abattoir in Hong Kong.Epidemiol. Infect.126173–179. 10.1017/S0950268801005210

  • 26

    MagwedereK.DangH. A.MillsE. W.CutterC. N.RobertsE. L.DebroyC. (2013). Incidence of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli strains in beef, pork, chicken, deer, boar, bison, and rabbit retail meat.J. Vet. Diagn. Invest.25254–258. 10.1177/1040638713477407

  • 27

    MartinA.BeutinL. (2011). Characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from meat and milk products of different origins and association with food producing animals as main contamination sources.Int. J. Food Microbiol.14699–104. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.041

  • 28

    MengQ.BaiX.ZhaoA.LanR.DuH.WangT.et al (2014). Characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from healthy pigs in China.BMC Microbiol.14:5. 10.1186/1471-2180-14-5

  • 29

    MohlatloleR. P.MadorobaE.MuchadeyiF. C.ChimonyoM.KanengoniA. T.DzombaE. F. (2013). Virulence profiles of enterotoxigenic, shiga toxin and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in South African pigs.Trop. Anim. Health Prod.451399–1405. 10.1007/s11250-013-0377-4

  • 30

    NiewerthU.FreyA.VossT.Le BouguénecC.BaljerG.FrankeS.et al (2001). The Aida autotransporter system is associated with F18 and stx2e in Escherichia coli isolates from pigs diagnosed with edema disease and postweaning diarrhea.Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.8143–149.

  • 31

    PadolaN. L.SanzM. E.BlancoJ. E.BlancoM.BlancoJ.EtcheverriaA. A. I.et al (2004). Serotypes and virulence genes of bovine Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) isolated from a feedlot in Argentina.Vet. Microbiol.1003–9. 10.1016/S0378-1135(03)00127-5

  • 32

    ParmaA.SanzM.BlancoJ.BlancoJ.ViñasM.BlancoM.et al (2000). Virulence genotypes and serotypes of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and foods in Argentina.Eur. J. Epidemiol.16757–762. 10.1023/A:1026746016896

  • 33

    PatonA. W.PatonJ. C. (2002). Direct detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli by multiplex PCR for stx1, stx2, eae, ehxA, and saa.J. Clin. Microbiol.40271–274. 10.1128/JCM.40.1.271-274.2002

  • 34

    PatonA. W.SrimanoteP.WoodrowM. C.PatonJ. C. (2001). Characterization of Saa, a novel autoagglutinating adhesin produced by locus of enterocyte effacement-negative Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli strains that are virulent for humans.Infect. Immun.696999–7009. 10.1128/IAI.69.11.6999-7009.2001

  • 35

    PatonJ. C.PatonA. W. (1998). Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.11450–479.

  • 36

    PradelN.LivrelliV.De ChampsC.PalcouxJ.-B.ReynaudA.ScheutzF.et al (2000). Prevalence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle, food, and children during a one-year prospective study in France.J. Clin. Microbiol.381023–1031.

  • 37

    RestieriC.GarrissG.LocasM.-C.DozoisC. M. (2007). Autotransporter-encoding sequences are phylogenetically distributed among Escherichia coli clinical isolates and reference strains.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.731553–1562. 10.1128/AEM.01542-06

  • 38

    RivasM.PadolaN. L.LucchesiP. M.MasanaM.TorresA. (2010). “Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Argentina,” in Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America, ed.TorresA. G. (Oak Park, IL: Bentham Science Publishers), 142–161.

  • 39

    RobertsT.HudsonW.WhelehanO.SimonsenB.OlgaardK.LabotsH.et al (1984). Number and distribution of bacteria on some beef carcasses at selected abattoirs in some member states of the European Communities.Meat Sci.11191–205. 10.1016/0309-1740(84)90037-8

  • 40

    SENASA (2002). “Circular 3496/02” in Animal.Argentina: Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria.

  • 41

    SonntagA.-K.BielaszewskaM.MellmannA.DierksenN.SchierackP.WielerL. H.et al (2005). Shiga toxin 2e-producing Escherichia coli isolates from humans and pigs differ in their virulence profiles and interactions with intestinal epithelial cells.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.718855–8863. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8855-8863.2005

  • 42

    SzaloI. M.GoffauxF.PirsonV.PiérardD.BallH.MainilJ. (2002). Presence in bovine enteropathogenic (EPEC) and enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) Escherichia coli of genes encoding for putative adhesins of human EHEC strains.Res. Microbiol.153653–658. 10.1016/S0923-2508(02)01379-7

  • 43

    TarrP. I.BilgeS. S.VaryJ. C.JelacicS.HabeebR. L.WardT. R.et al (2000). Iha: a novel Escherichia coli O157: H7 adherence-conferring molecule encoded on a recently acquired chromosomal island of conserved structure.Infect. Immun.681400–1407. 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1400-1407.2000

  • 44

    Trotz-WilliamsL. A.MercerN. J.WaltersJ. M.MakiA. M.JohnsonR. P. (2012). Pork implicated in a Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157: H7 outbreak in Ontario, Canada.Can. J. Public Health103e322–e326.

  • 45

    TsengM.FratamicoP. M.BagiL.DelannoyS.FachP.ManningS. D.et al (2014). Diverse virulence gene content of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from finishing swine.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.806395–6402. 10.1128/AEM.01761-14

  • 46

    WellsT. J.SherlockO.RivasL.MahajanA.BeatsonS. A.TorpdahlM.et al (2008). EhaA is a novel autotransporter protein of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7 that contributes to adhesion and biofilm formation.Environ. Microbiol.10589–604. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01479.x

  • 47

    WoodwardM.CarrollP.WrayC. (1992). Detection of entero-and verocyto-toxin genes in Escherichia coli from diarrhoeal disease in animals using the polymerase chain reaction.Vet. Microbiol.31251–261. 10.1016/0378-1135(92)90083-6

  • 48

    WuY.HinenoyaA.TaguchiT.NagitaA.ShimaK.TsukamotoT.et al (2010). Distribution of virulence genes related to adhesions and toxins in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from healthy cattle and diarrheal patients in Japan.J. Vet. Med. Sci.72589–597. 10.1292/jvms.09-0557

  • 49

    YoonS. C.WindhamW. R.LadelyS.HeitschmidtG. W.LawrenceK. C.ParkB.et al (2013). Differentiation of big-six non-O157 Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on spread plates of mixed cultures using hyperspectral imaging.J. Food Meas. Charact.747–59. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-497

  • 50

    ZhaoL.ChenX.XuX.SongG.LiuX. (2009). Analysis of the AIDA-I gene sequence and prevalence in Escherichia coli isolates from pigs with post-weaning diarrhoea and oedema disease.Vet. J.180124–129. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.10.021

Summary

Keywords

STEC, foodborne pathogens, pork production chain, prevalence, characterization

Citation

Colello R, Cáceres ME, Ruiz MJ, Sanz M, Etcheverría AI and Padola NL (2016) From Farm to Table: Follow-Up of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Throughout the Pork Production Chain in Argentina. Front. Microbiol. 7:93. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00093

Received

03 November 2015

Accepted

18 January 2016

Published

08 February 2016

Volume

7 - 2016

Edited by

Pina Fratamico, United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, USA

Reviewed by

James L. Smith, United States Department of Agriculture, USA; Yanhong Liu, European Roma Rights Centre – United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, USA

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: AnalĂ­a I. EtcheverrĂ­a,

This article was submitted to Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics