Abstract
During their lifecycle, from free-living soil bacteria to endosymbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteroids of legumes, rhizobia must colonize, and cope with environments where nutrient concentrations and compositions vary greatly. Bacterial colonization of legume rhizospheres and of root surfaces is subject to a fierce competition for plant exudates. By contrast root nodules offer to rhizobia sheltered nutrient-rich environments within which the cells that successfully propagated via infection threads can rapidly multiply. To explore the effects on symbiosis of a slower rhizobia growth and metabolism, we deleted one or two copies of the three functional rRNA operons of the promiscuous Sinorhizobium fredii strain NGR234 and examined the impact of these mutations on free-living and symbiotic lifestyles. Strains with two functional rRNA operons (NGRΔrRNA1 and NGRΔrRNA3) grew almost as rapidly as NGR234, and NGRΔrRNA1 was as proficient as the parent strain on all of the five legume species tested. By contrast, the NGRΔrRNA1,3 double mutant, which carried a single rRNA operon and grew significantly slower than NGR234, had a reduced symbiotic proficiency on Cajanus cajan, Macroptilium atropurpureum, Tephrosia vogelii, and Vigna unguiculata. In addition, while NGRΔrRNA1 and NGR234 equally competed for nodulation of V. unguiculata, strain NGRΔrRNA1,3 was clearly outcompeted by wild-type. Surprisingly, on Leucaena leucocephala, NGRΔrRNA1,3 was the most proficient strain and competed equally NGR234 for nodule occupation. Together, these results indicate that for strains with otherwise identical repertoires of symbiotic genes, a faster growth on roots and/or inside plant tissues may contribute to secure access to nodules of some hosts. By contrast, other legumes such as L. leucocephala appear as less selective and capable of providing symbiotic environments susceptible to accommodate strains with a broader spectrum of competences.
Introduction
Nitrogen-fixing symbioses between legumes and soil bacteria, commonly known as rhizobia, are responsible for introducing a large fraction of fixed N into terrestrial ecosystems. These beneficial plant-microbe associations come in many forms and shapes (; ), yet all involve the intracellular colonization by soil rhizobia of legume cells grouped into nodules: Specialized root (or more rarely stem) organs within which endosymbiotic rhizobia reduce atmospheric nitrogen (N2). Although alternative mechanisms exist in diverse legume species, infection of root tissues is often mediated by infection threads (ITs) that guide dividing rhizobia through several cortical cell layers and toward the developing nodule primordia (). In most legume crops, establishment of symbiosis is triggered and coordinated by molecular signals exchanged between legumes and rhizobia, beginning with the secretion of plant flavonoids to which compatible rhizobia respond with the synthesis and secretion of nodulation (Nod-) factors (NF). In turn, NF provoke the curling of root hairs onto which rhizobia are attached, the division of cortical cells that will eventually form nodule primordia, and permit the entry of rhizobia into root hairs (; ).
In Medicago truncatula, initiation of ITs begins once root hairs are fully curled and have entrapped, in most cases, a single rhizobia cell at the origin of an enclosed micro-colony. ITs begin to form 10–20 h after infection chambers are sealed (), and extend by 4–5 μm per hour with alternating phases of rapid or slower elongation depending on the intracellular dynamics of infected root hairs (). Successive cell divisions allow rhizobia to progress within developing ITs and microscopy studies showed that generation time of rhizobia within ITs was close to that observed in vitro using standard growth media (). Thus, growth conditions within developing ITs must be favorable to rhizobia with enough nutrients to sustain a rapid bacterial division when needed. It is unknown whether some legumes, at one stage of the infection process, favor strains with either faster or slower generation times, however. In any event, bacterial surface components and secreted proteins play important roles in modulating the infection process (). Once released from ITs, rhizobia multiply within the cytoplasm of nodule cells and eventually differentiate into N2-fixing bacteroids. Reduced nitrogen is assimilated by host plants in exchange for amino acids and carbon sources derived from photosynthesis that fuel the intense bacteroid metabolism ().
Nodule morphology and characteristics vary considerably between legume species (). Major legume crops make either one of two nodule types that can be distinguished according to their ontogeny and development, however (). Nodules of indeterminate growth possess a persistent distal meristem that, in Medicago species, derives from middle cortical cells with inner cortical and pericycle cells also contributing to nodule growth (). Mature indeterminate nodules (IDN) are elongated and characterized by a longitudinal gradient of plant and rhizobia cells at different stages of differentiation. Inside IDN of M. truncatula and other legumes of the Inverted Repeat-Lacking Clade (IRLC) (), nodule-specific cysteine-rich plant peptides provoke a profound and irreversible differentiation of bacteroids making them incapable of resuming free-living growth (). Yet, inside IDN of the non-galegoid species Mimosa pudica (mimosoid clade of Caesalpinioideae), bacteroids were reported to resemble free-living cells in many aspects indicating that terminal bacteroid differentiation was not a general feature of IDN making legumes (). By contrast, determinate nodules (DN) are spherical in shape, and reported to originate with external cortical cells and to have a transient meristematic activity, resulting in a differentiation of plant and rhizobia cells that is more synchronous throughout the nodule. As bacteroids of DN are not terminally differentiated, most rhizobia can resume a free-living growth in soils once nodules senesce and disaggregate. Recently, plants of the Indigofera and Tephrosia genera that were initially thought to form IDN, were reported to make nodules that carry secondary clusters of dividing cells instead of a persistent meristem (). Yet, regardless of the strain or type of nodule considered, rhizobia must first efficiently colonize the plant rhizosphere, multiply within growing ITs, circumvent or withstand plant defenses, colonize and establish persistent colonies inside nodules cells, before becoming proficient symbionts. As a single rhizobia cell suffices to make a functional nodule containing up to 108 to 109 bacteroids (), numerous cell divisions and intense bacterial metabolism are needed to secure establishment of a proficient symbiosis.
Amongst the many rhizobia strains studied worldwide, Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii strain NGR234 has the broadest host-range described so far (). Capable of nodulating plants of >120 legume genera, NGR234 fixes nitrogen inside nodules of determinate and indeterminate types. Such unsurpassed symbiotic promiscuity, raised the question of the molecular mechanisms used by NGR234 to elicit root nodule formation, successfully infect nodule cells and fix nitrogen on/in so many hosts (; ). Many studies confirmed that the 536 kb plasmid called pNGR234a carries most of the symbiotic genes [including (; ; )], albeit the NGR234 3.9 Mb chromosome and 2.4 Mb megaplasmid pNGR234b were also shown to contribute to symbiosis (; ). Strain NGR234 is not necessarily the most infective or proficient microsymbiont, however. For example, the slower growing Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain G49 outcompeted NGR234 on Vigna unguiculata (), even though cowpea is considered a promiscuous legume (). Similarly, the slow-growing B. japonicum strain E109 also outcompeted the faster-growing S. fredii strain SMH12 on several soybean cultivars (). Although many factors contribute to make strains more competitive than others for nodulation (), a slower growth rate apparently does not reduce competitiveness of bradyrhizobia.
Fast-growing rhizobia (e.g., sinorhizobia, mesorhizobia, etc.) have generation times of 2–5 h, whereas slower growing strains such as bradyrhizobia may divide every 6–13 h (). Various genetic and environmental factors influence growth rates, yet bacteria with fewer ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operons tend to grow slower than those with many rRNA gene copies (), with the number of rRNA operons ranging from 1 to 15 copies per genome (). In general, rRNA operons code for 5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA subunits and one or several tRNA genes. NGR234 has three such rRNA operons (), and was shown to divide every 2.5 h on a minimal medium supplemented with succinate as a sole carbon source (). Some rhizobia have more than three rRNA operon copies, including the fast growing strains Cupriavidus taiwanensis LMG19424T (two chromosomes and 5 rRNA operons) (), Methylobacterium nodulans ORS2060T (one chromosome and 7 rRNA operons) () and Paraburkholderia phymatum strain STM815T (two chromosomes and 6 rRNA operons) (), which take two to three days to form visible colonies on synthetic media. By contrast, a single rRNA operon containing strain such as Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T divides every 9.6 h (), while the extremely slow-growing Bradyrhizobium liaoningense isolates have generation times of up to 40 h (). Studies on Escherichia coli showed that cells with deletions in one to two of the seven rRNA operon copies present in this species could grow at nearly maximal rate and remained viable even with as little as a single rRNA operon (; ). Yet, in competition experiments wild-type cells rapidly outgrew mutants deleted for one or two rRNA operons, indicating that the seven operons architecture was favored to secure a rapid adaptation to “feast and famine” conditions encountered by E. coli through its life-history (). Experiments on Bacillus subtilis confirmed that mutants with only one out of ten rRNA operons grew poorly but nonetheless retained the ability to sporulate, albeit at lower frequencies than the wild type (). While these findings confirmed that bacteria remained viable even with a number of rRNA operons considerably reduced, complex cell processes (such as division and sporulation) were affected making rRNA-mutants less fit than parent strains.
Changes in nutrient availability have been shown to shape bacterial communities, with strains having fewer rRNA operons dominating older successional communities with scarcer resources (), and with rRNA operon numbers becoming predictors of bacterial reproductive strategies (). During their lifecycle, rhizobia must operate and compete in environments where resources and cell densities vary greatly, including in nutrient poor and thinly populated soils, rich but highly colonized root surfaces, to the particularly sheltered nutrient-abundant but highly specialized nodule cells. Given these markedly different environments within which rhizobia must operate, either as free-living or as endosymbiotic cells, we asked whether deletion of rRNA operons would significantly alter symbiotic proficiency of a promiscuous rhizobia strain. Accordingly, NGR234 was deleted of one and two of its three functional copies of rRNA operons and the effects of these deletions on growth, nodulation of several legume species, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and competition for nodulation were examined.
Materials and Methods
Microbiological Techniques
Plasmids and bacterial strains used in this study are described in Supplementary Table S1. NGR234 and derivative strains were grown at 27°C in/on rhizobia minimal medium supplemented with succinate (RMS) () or tryptone yeast (TY) medium (). E. coli was grown at 37°C in/on LB. Antibiotics kanamycin, rifampicin, and spectinomycin were used at final concentrations of 50 μg ml-1. To compare growth of NGR234 and derivative mutants, 108 cells from overnight pre-cultures at OD600 comprised between 0.3 and 0.5 were transferred to 50 ml fresh RMS cultures that were incubated for 3 days at 27°C and 190 rpm. For each strain, three replicate cultures were followed in parallel and OD600 was measured at regular intervals. Generation time was estimated during the exponential phase of growth, using as standard the NGR234 growth curve established by Broughton and Fellay (unpublished). Development of colonies formed by NGR234 and rRNA-deleted mutants was followed on TY and RMS plates using serial cell dilutions to obtain plates with ca. 10, 100, and 1000 colonies. After 5 and 7 days of incubation at 27°C for TY and RMS, respectively, the diameter of at least 30 isolated colonies per strain was measured using the Fiji image processing software ().
Sequence Verification and Deletion of the NGR234 rRNA Operons
To confirm sequence polymorphisms in promoter and terminator regions as well as in the 16S rRNA genes, overlapping clones of an ordered cosmid library () were used as templates to amplify each of the three rRNA operons independently: pXB123 and pXB487 were selected for amplifying the rRNA1 operon, pXB375 and pXB684 covered the rRNA2 locus, pXB72 and pXB942 carried the rRNA3 operon. End sequences of the inserts carried by these cosmids were obtained during the sequencing of the NGR234 genome (), allowing for a precise mapping onto the chromosome replicon (see Supplementary Table S1). Promoter and terminator regions were amplified and sequenced using combinations of primers listed in Supplementary Table S2 and which positions are shown in Figure 1. 16S rRNA genes were amplified and sequenced using the 16S-For3 and 16S-Rev3 primers (). To obtain the NGRΔrRNA3 mutant, regions flanking the rRNA3 operon were amplified using C3D-For/C3D-Rev and C3G-For/C3G-Rev primers (Supplementary Table S2) and NGR234 genomic DNA as template. The C3G-For/C3G-Rev and C3D-For/C3D-Rev amplicons were restricted by, respectively, SpeI and BamHI or XhoI and BamHI, and the resulting 1,391 and 979 bp fragments cloned into pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene) restricted by SpeI and XhoI, yielding construct pBSC3. The spectinomycin resistant (SpR) Ω cassette of pHP45 () was cloned into the unique BamHI site of pBSC3 to generate pBSC3Sp, which 4.4 kb SpeI-XhoI insert was further subcloned into pJQ200SK (). The resulting pJQC3Sp clone was then mobilized into NGR234 by triparental mating using pRK2013 as helper (). Eventually, mutants with the rRNA3 operon replaced by the Ω (SpR) interposon were selected onto RMS plates containing spectinomycin (50 μg/ml) and 5% (w/v) sucrose. Candidate colonies for marker exchange were purified and genotyped by PCR using combinations of primers matching sequences outside of (C3D-Rev2 and C3G-For2) or within the deleted rRNA3 operon (C3D-For2 and C3G-Rev2), as well as within the Ω cassette (primer Omega) (see Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 1). A similar strategy was used to delete the rRNA1 operon and yield the NGRΔrRNA1 mutant, except that flanking sequences were amplified with the C1D-For/C1D-Rev and C1G-For/C1G-Rev primer pairs and were directly cloned into pJQ200SK using SpeI, BamHI, and PstI as restriction enzymes, yielding the pJQC1 intermediate construct (Supplementary Table S1). pJQC1Km was obtained by cloning the kanamycin resistant (KmR) Ω cassette into the unique BamHI site of pJQC1. Following tri-parental mating and selection of candidate KmR NGRΔrRNA1 mutants on sucrose-containing media, deletion of the rRNA1 operon was confirmed by PCR using combinations of the following primers: C1D-Rev2, C1G-For3, C1D-For2, C1G-Rev3, and Omega. Inserts cloned into pBSC3 and pJQC1 were verified by DNA sequencing. The mutant of NGR234 lacking both rRNA1 and rRNA3 operons (strain NGRΔrRNA1,3) was obtained by deleting the rRNA1 copy in the selected NGRΔrRNA3 mutant, using a similar procedure as described above. Genotype of NGRΔrRNA1,3 candidate mutants was verified by PCR, using primer sets designed to confirm deletion of the rRNA1 copy.
FIGURE 1
Plant Assays
Nodulation assays were conducted as in
Results
Structure and Organization of the NGR234 rRNA Operons
The rRNA operons flank both sides of the chromosomal replication origin with genes oriented as the replication forks (Figure 1A). All three rRNA operons have identical structures: One 16S rRNA gene at the 5′-end, followed by tRNAIle and tRNAAla copies, 23S and 5S rRNA genes and, at the 3′-end of the operon a copy of tRNAMet (Figure 1B). According to published genome data (
Construction of rRNA-Deletion Mutants and Phenotypes on Free-Living Growth
Because its promoter, 5S rRNA and tRNAMet intergenic as well as terminator regions differed most from the other two copies, the rRNA3 operon was deemed as less likely to be essential for cellular processes and thus, was selected as the first target for mutagenesis. Accordingly, the complete rRNA3 operon was replaced by a spectinomycin-resistant version of the omega interposon (
FIGURE 2

Growth curves for NGR234 and the rRNA-deletion mutants. Evolution of the growth of NGR234 (O), NGRΔrRNA1 (Δ), NGRΔrRNA3 (□), and NGRΔrRNA1,3 (●) strains in liquid RMS cultures at 27°C and with orbital shaking. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean, with three independent cultures grown in parallel for each strain.
Effect of rRNA Deletion on Symbiosis With Legumes
To test the effect of deleting rRNA operons on nodulation and nitrogen fixation, the symbiotic proficiency of NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1, and NGRΔrRNA1,3 was examined on five legume species that formed nodules of either determinate (M. atropurpureum and V. unguiculata), indeterminate (L. leucocephala) or determinate with secondary clusters of dividing cells (T. vogelii and by analogy C. cajan as well) types. Phenotype of each inoculum was examined using nodule number (NN), total nodule fresh weight (NFW), and shoot dry weight (SDW) of inoculated plants as markers for symbiotic activity. As shown in Table 1, both of the NGRΔrRNA1 and NGRΔrRNA1,3 mutants still formed nodules (Nod+ phenotype) and reduced atmospheric nitrogen (Fix+ phenotype) on all of the hosts. SDW and NFW of plants inoculated with NGRΔrRNA1 or NGR234 were similar and only the NN of NGRΔrRNA1 showed a statistically significant decrease when inoculated onto V. unguiculata. By contrast, symbiotic proficiency of NGRΔrRNA1,3 was impaired on four out of the five legume species tested with NN, NFW, and/or SDW being significantly reduced (P < 0.05) when compared to plants inoculated with NGR234. Interestingly, when L. leucocephala plants were harvested at 49 dpi, NGRΔrRNA1,3 showed symbiotic efficacies similar to those of NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1, however.
Table 1
| Host | Inoculum | Plants | mNN | mNFW (mg) | mSDW (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. cajan (42 dpi) | NGR234 | 12 | 25.1 (±6.7) | 839.9 (±202.0) | 1428.9 (±240.6) |
| NGRΔrRNA1 | 12 | 24.3 (±6.6) | 879.1 (±92.6) | 1595.8 (±250.6) | |
| NGRΔrRNA1,3 | 12 | 20.4(±5.2) | 658.7 (±182.6)* | 1181.3 (±223.0)* | |
| Non-inoculated | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.5 (±22.2) | |
| M. atropurpureum (42 dpi) | NGR234 | 10 | 60.6 (±12.6) | 487.0 (±151.9) | 783.6 (±182.3) |
| NGRΔrRNA1 | 10 | 65.6 (±15.4) | 498.8 (±87.9) | 725.1 (±175.4) | |
| NGRΔrRNA1,3 | 12 | 49.3 (±11.2)* | 431.7 (±159.1) | 514.5 (±165.1)* | |
| Non-inoculated | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 42.8 (±16.5) | |
| L. leucocephala (49 dpi) | NGR234 | 11 | 20.9 (±5.1) | 168.0 (±38.4) | 400.1 (±76.4) |
| NGRΔrRNA1 | 11 | 20.4 (±5.1) | 164.6 (±34.5) | 399.2 (±89.8) | |
| NGRΔrRNA1,3 | 12 | 25.3 (±7.4) | 148.4 (±28.8) | 429.8 (±56.9) | |
| Non-inoculated | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 129.8 (±29.8) | |
| L. leucocephala (70 dpi) | NGR234 | 12 | 40.4 (±11.1) | 335.2 (±97.5) | 647.6 (±136.1) |
| NGRΔrRNA1,3 | 14 | 43.7 (±11.3) | 489.3 (±150.2)* | 1,001.1 (±290.5)* | |
| Non-inoculated | 6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 102.2 (±29.5) | |
| T. vogelii (42 dpi) | NGR234 | 10 | 17.0 (±6.6) | 596.0 (±171) | 689.6 (±168.9) |
| NGRΔrRNA1 | 11 | 16.0 (±5.5) | 587.7 (±159.2) | 683.0 (±175.5) | |
| NGRΔrRNA1,3 | 11 | 7.5 (±3.9)* | 432.2 (±103.9)* | 581.4 (±132.0) | |
| Non-inoculated | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 136.5 (±34.2) | |
| V. unguiculata (36 dpi) | NGR234 | 10 | 111.0 (±26.8) | 978.7 (±171.5) | 1978.8 (±390.2) |
| NGRΔrRNA1 | 11 | 89.4 (±13.5)* | 893.4 (±224) | 1730.4 (±369.7) | |
| NGRΔrRNA1,3 | 10 | 103.1 (±21.1) | 646.7 (±99.5)* | 1273.5 (±261.1)* | |
| Non-inoculated | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 193.3 (±79.4) |
Symbiotic proficiency of NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1, and NGRΔrRNA1,3 on five legume species.
Phenotype of each strain is reported as the mean nodule number (mNN), nodule fresh weight (mNFW), and shoot dry weight (mSDW) per plant, with standard deviation shown in parenthesis. Except for non-inoculated controls, results are the means of 10–12 plants per treatment, with each plant being inoculated with 200 μl of 2 × 108 freshly grown bacteria. Depending on the host, plants were harvested at 36, 42, 49, or 70 days post-inoculation (dpi). Values that differed significantly between mutants and parent NGR234 (level α = 5%) are marked with an asterisk.
Kinetics of Nodulation of Parent and rRNA-Mutant Strains on V. unguiculata
Since deletion of one or two copies of the three rRNA operons of NGR234 did not block nodule formation or symbiotic nitrogen fixation, we examined whether kinetics of nodulation was altered. To this effect, V. unguiculata seedlings were inoculated with either NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1, NGRΔrRNA3, or NGRΔrRNA1,3 strains and parameters such as the average NN, NFW, and SDW for 12 plants per treatment were recorded at 12, 24, and 36 days post-inoculation (dpi). In addition, the relative chlorophyll content of the first and second trifoliate leaves was monitored every third day since 12 dpi, using a SPAD chlorophyll meter. At 12 dpi all inoculated plants already carried nodules (see Figure 3A and Supplementary Figure S5). Throughout the experiment, the NGRΔrRNA1 and NGRΔrRNA3 mutants formed slightly fewer nodules than NGR234, yet SDW of plants was similar indicating that symbiotic nitrogen fixation was not significantly impaired by deletion of a single rRNA operon (Figure 3C). Symbiotic proficiency of the NGRΔrRNA1 and NGRΔrRNA3 mutants at nearly wild type levels was also confirmed by SPAD readings, as relative chlorophyll contents of plants inoculated with NGR234 or mutants deleted of one rRNA operon were similar at all time points (Figure 3D). By contrast, at 12, 24, and 36 dpi the number of nodules formed by NGRΔrRNA1,3 (respectively, of 6.3, 25.0, and 76.8 nodules) was considerably reduced as compared to NGR234 (19.7, 36.4, and 102.3 nodules), suggesting nodule formation was significantly delayed (Figure 3A). Overall symbiotic activity of NGRΔrRNA1,3 was clearly impaired as shown in Figure 3C,D, with SPAD readings of inoculated plants that plateaued at 47.9 at 33 dpi whereas those inoculated with NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1, or NGRΔrRNA3 mutants reached higher values comprised between 52.2 and 52.8 (Figure 3D). To check for leghemoglobin expression, several nodules formed at 12, 24, and 36 dpi were sectioned and photographed. At 12 dpi, nodules formed by NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1, and NGRΔrRNA3 already contained leghemoglobin whereas most of the fewer nodules formed by NGRΔrRNA1,3 were still white or faintly pink (see Supplementary Figure S5). At 24 dpi, all of the nodules elicited by NGRΔrRNA1,3 had turned pink, indicating nitrogen fixation had started as confirmed by the increased SPAD values. At 36 dpi and regardless of the inoculum, nodules formed by all mutant or parent strains expressed leghemoglobins.
FIGURE 3

Kinetics of nodulation for NGR234 and rRNA-deletion mutants. Plants of V. unguiculata were harvested at 12, 24, and 36 days post-inoculation (dpi). For each time point, the nodule number (A), nodule fresh weight (B), and shoot dry weight (C) was averaged for 10–12 plants inoculated with either NGR234 (O), NGRΔrRNA1 (Δ), NGRΔrRNA3 (□), and NGRΔrRNA1,3 (●) strains. For non-inoculated control plants (X) that did not carry nodules, only the SDW and SPAD values are shown. Relative chlorophyll contents that are expressed as mean SPAD values for eight plants per treatment (D), were measured every 3 days, starting at 12 dpi. Standard deviations are shown as bars above and below each data point.
Competition for Nodule Occupancy by NGR234 and rRNA-Deleted Strains
To determine whether deletion of rRNA operons influenced the competitiveness of NGR234 to form and occupy nodules, seedlings of V. unguiculata were inoculated with 106 cells of NGR234 and NGRΔrRNA1 at respective ratios of ca. 1:1, 1:4, and 4:1. At 24 dpi, all nodules found on roots of inoculated plants were collected and bacteria isolated from >180 nodules per treatment. Isolated nodule bacteria were then tested for their resistance to kanamycin and/or rifampicin, to differentiate between the NGRΔrRNA1 (KmR and RifR) and NGR234 (RifR) strains. Proportion of wild type versus mutant in each of the inocula was verified at the time of inoculating plants, showing that number of NGRΔrRNA1 cells was always slightly in excess when compared to NGR234 (see Table 2). Yet, regardless of the cell ratios that were inoculated, the most abundant strain always colonized nodules more efficiently, suggesting that deletion of the rRNA1 copy had no significant effect on the ability of NGR234 to nodulate V. unguiculata. However, when a similar experiment was conducted using NGR234 and NGRΔrRNA1,3 as competitors, the parent strain clearly outcompeted NGRΔrRNA1,3 on cowpea. Given the similar symbiotic proficiencies of NGR234 and rRNA-deletion mutants observed 49 dpi on L. leucocephala (Table 1), seedlings were inoculated with NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1,3 or a 1:1 mixed inoculant of NGR234 and NGRΔrRNA1,3. At 28 dpi, L. leucocephala plants challenged with the mixed inoculum were harvested and identity of nodule bacteria determined. As shown in Table 2, NGRΔrRNA1,3 occupied nearly half of the nodules collected at 28 dpi indicating the mutant was apparently as competitive as the wild type for infecting L. leucocephala nodules. Interestingly, when plants treated with single-strain inoculants were harvested at 70 dpi, the dry mass of L. leucocephala shoots inoculated with NGRΔrRNA1,3 was in average significantly higher than when NGR234 was used as inoculum (Table 1). These results confirmed that the effect on symbiosis of deleting rRNA operons of NGR234 varied considerably between host plants.
Table 2
| Inoculated cell ratios | Growing nodule isolates | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competing strains | Aimed | Real | Host plant | Total | KmR | % KmR |
| NGR234 vs. NGRΔrRNA1 | 1:1 | 42:58 | 187 | 133 | 71.1 | |
| 4:1 | 70:30 | V. unguiculata | 241 | 54 | 22.4 | |
| 1:4 | 14:86 | 235 | 208 | 88.5 | ||
| NGR234 vs. NGRΔrRNA1,3 | 1:1 | 43:57 | V. unguiculata | 147 | 5 | 3.4 |
| 1:1 | 45:55 | L. leucocephala | 140 | 69 | 49.3 | |
Competition of NGR234 and rRNA-deletion mutants for nodulation of V. unguiculata and L. leucocephala.
To compare NGR234, NGRΔrRNA1, and NGRΔrRNA1,3 nodulation competitiveness, plants were challenged with mixed inoculants. On V. unguiculata, NGR234 and NGRΔrRNA1 were inoculated at ratios of 1:1, 1:4, and 4:1 for a total of 106 cells per plant. Given its slower growth and poor competitiveness in initial tests on cowpea, the NGRΔrRNA1,3 mutant was inoculated at equal numbers with NGR234. For each inoculum, strain ratio was verified by plating serial dilutions of the inoculum onto TYA plates containing rifampicin or kanamycin, with kanamycin resistant (KmR) colonies or nodule isolates scored as being or containing mutant strains. For these analyses, nodules were collected on a minimum of 10 plants per treatment and at 24 and 28 dpi for V. unguiculata and L. leucocephala, respectively.
Discussion
Previous studies have addressed the impact of modifying the number or sequence of rRNA operons on various cell processes such as response of Synechococcus cyanobacteria to temperature changes (
To minimize any detrimental effect of altered stoichiometry in 5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA molecules on the assembly and functioning of ribosomes, mutants of NGR234 were deleted for whole rRNA1 and/or rRNA3 operons including for the corresponding promoter and terminator regions. As the Omega interposon is flanked by strong transcription terminators (
Nonetheless mutants of NGR234 carrying two or only one rRNA operons were viable. Deletion of a single rRNA operon had little effect on the growth of mutants, with generation times of 25–30 min longer than for the parent NGR234 strain (ca. 2h40). This suggests NGRΔrRNA1 and NGRΔrRNA3 possibly compensated for deletion of one rRNA operon by an increased expression of the remaining intact copies as was reported to occur in E. coli (
Deletion of a single rRNA operon had little impact on the symbiotic proficiency of NGR234 on five different legume species, with NGRΔrRNA1 forming as many nodules as the parent strain. Nitrogen fixation was not impaired either since shoot dry weight of plants inoculated with NGR234 or NGRΔrRNA1 was similar and SPAD values showed V. unguiculata plants did not suffer from nitrogen starvation once nodules were formed and fully active, and as soon as 18 dpi. By contrast, deletion of both rRNA1 and rRNA3 operons significantly impaired but did not abolish proficiency of NGRΔrRNA1,3 on several hosts. The symbiotic defect of NGRΔrRNA1,3 was more pronounced on M. atropurpureum and V. unguiculata with a >30% decrease in SDW, whereas C. cajan and T. vogelii plants only suffered a ca. 15% decrease in SDW. Surprisingly, when plants were harvested 10 weeks post inoculation NGRΔrRNA1,3 was found to be more proficient than NGR234 on L. leucocephala, thus confirming that the impact on symbiosis of deleting rRNA operons is host-specific. M. atropurpureum and V. unguiculata form DN within which the intracellular rhizobia undergo multiple rounds of division inside plant cells that are themselves dividing. Once cell divisions eventually stop, mature nodules with fully differentiated bacteroids are formed (
Differentiation of rhizobia into bacteroids was reported to correlate with a reduction in translation machinery and an overall slowdown of bacteroid metabolism (
Many factors contribute to make rhizobia competitive for nodulation. For examples production of rhizobitoxine by Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA94 strain enhances its competitive nodulation on M. atropurpureum (
Statements
Author contributions
XP and AEC conceived the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. AEC performed the experiments. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
We would like to thank Natalia Giot for her help in many aspects of this work, and the University of Geneva as well as the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants 31003A-146548 and 31003A-173191) for financial support. AEC acknowledges the generous support of a Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship for foreign students.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00154/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AcinasS. G.MarcelinoL. A.Klepac-CerajV.PolzM. F. (2004). Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons.J. Bacteriol.1862629–2635. 10.1128/Jb.186.9.2629-2635.2004
2
AmadouC.PascalG.MangenotS.GlewM.BontempsC.CapelaD.et al (2008). Genome sequence of the β-rhizobium Cupriavidus taiwanensis and comparative genomics of rhizobia.Genome Res.181472–1483. 10.1101/gr.076448.108
3
AsaiT.CondonC.VoulgarisJ.ZaporojetsD.ShenB. H.Al-OmarM.et al (1999). Construction and initial characterization of Escherichia coli strains with few or no intact chromosomal rRNA operons.J. Bacteriol.1813803–3809.
4
BakkouN. (2011). Characterization of the Endosymbiotic forms of Sinorhizobium sp. Strain NGR234.Ph.D. thesis, University of GenevaGeneva4286.
5
BarnettM. J.TomanC. J.FisherR. F.LongS. R. (2004). A dual-genome symbiosis chip for coordinate study of signal exchange and development in a prokaryote-host interaction.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10116636–16641. 10.1073/pnas.0407269101
6
BeckerA.BergesH.KrolE.BruandC.RubergS.CapelaD.et al (2004). Global changes in gene expression in Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 under microoxic and symbiotic conditions.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.17292–303. 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.3.292
7
BergK. L.SquiresC.SquiresC. L. (1989). Ribosomal-RNA operon anti-termination. Function of leader and spacer region box-B box-A sequences and their conservation in diverse microorganisms.J. Mol. Biol.209345–358. 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90002-8
8
BeringerJ. E. (1974). R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum.J. Gen. Microbiol.84188–198. 10.1099/00221287-84-1-188
9
BollenbachT.QuanS.ChaitR.KishonyR. (2009). Nonoptimal microbial response to antibiotics underlies suppressive drug interactions.Cell139707–718. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.025
10
BroughtonW. J.DilworthM. J. (1971). Control of leghaemoglobin synthesis in snake beans.Biochem. J.1251075–1080. 10.1042/bj1251075
11
BroughtonW. J.JabbouriS.PerretX. (2000). Keys to symbiotic harmony.J. Bacteriol.1825641–5652. 10.1128/JB.182.20.5641-5652.2000
12
BroughtonW. J.WongC.-H.LewinA.SamreyU.MyintH.Meyerz. A. H.et al (1986). Identification of Rhizobium plasmid sequences involved in recognition of Psophocarpus, Vigna, and other legumes.J. Cell Biol.1021173–1182. 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1173
13
CapelaD.FilipeC.BobikC.BatutJ.BruandC. (2006). Sinorhizobium meliloti differentiation during symbiosis with alfalfa: a transcriptomic dissection.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.19363–372. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0363
14
ChanP. P.LoweT. M. (2016). GtRNAdb 2.0: an expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes.Nucleic Acids Res.44D184–D189. 10.1093/nar/gkv1309
15
CoenyeT.VandammeP. (2003). Intragenomic heterogeneity between multiple 16S ribosomal RNA operons in sequenced bacterial genomes.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.22845–49. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00717-1
16
CondonC.FrenchS.SquiresC.SquiresC. L. (1993). Depletion of functional ribosomal RNA operons in Escherichia coli causes increased expression of the remaining intact copies.EMBO J.124305–4315. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06115.x
17
DingH.YipC. B.GeddesB. A.OresnikI. J.HynesM. F. (2012). Glycerol utilization by Rhizobium leguminosarum requires an ABC transporter and affects competition for nodulation.Microbiology1581369–1378. 10.1099/mic.0.057281-0
18
FarnhamP. J.PlattT. (1981). Rho-independent termination: dyad symmetry in DNA causes RNA-polymerase to pause during transcription in vitro.Nucleic Acids Res.9563–577. 10.1093/nar/9.3.563
19
FellayR.FreyJ.KrischH. (1987). Interposon mutagenesis of soil and water bacteria: a family of DNA fragments designed for in vitro insertional mutagenesis of Gram-negative bacteria.Gene52147–154. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90041-2
20
FergusonB. J.IndrasumunarA.HayashiS.LinM. H.LinY. H.ReidD. E.et al (2010). Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation.J. Integr. Plant Biol.5261–76. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00899.x
21
FigurskiD. H.HelinskiD. R. (1979). Replication of an origin-containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.761648–1652. 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1648
22
FossouR. K.ZieglerD.ZézéA.BarjaF.PerretX. (2016). Two major clades of bradyrhizobia dominate symbiotic interactions with pigeonpea in fields of Côte d’Ivoire.Front. Microbiol.7:1793. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01793
23
FournierJ.TeilletA.ChabaudM.IvanovS.GenreA.LimpensE.et al (2015). Remodeling of the infection chamber before infection thread formation reveals a two-step mechanism for rhizobial entry into the host legume root hair.Plant Physiol.1671233–1242. 10.1104/pp.114.253302
24
FournierJ.TimmersA. C. J.SiebererB. J.JauneauA.ChabaudM.BarkerD. G. (2008). Mechanism of infection thread elongation in root hairs of Medicago truncatula and dynamic interplay with associated rhizobial colonization.Plant Physiol.1481985–1995. 10.1104/pp.108.125674
25
FreibergC.FellayR.BairochA.BroughtonW. J.RosenthalA.PerretX. (1997). Molecular basis of symbiosis between Rhizobium and legumes.Nature387394–401. 10.1038/387394a0
26
FryJ.WoodM.PooleP. S. (2001). Investigation of myo-inositol catabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae and its effect on nodulation competitiveness.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.141016–1025. 10.1094/Mpmi.2001.14.8.1016
27
FumeauxC.BakkouN.KopćinskaJ.GolinowskiW.WestenbergD. J.MüllerP.et al (2011). Functional analysis of the nifQdctA1y4vGHIJ operon of Sinorhizobium fredii strain NGR234 using a transposon with a NifA-dependent read-out promoter.Microbiology1572745–2758. 10.1099/mic.0.049999-0
28
GageD. J. (2002). Analysis of infection thread development using Gfp- and DsRed-expressing Sinorhizobium meliloti.J. Bacteriol.1847042–7046. 10.1128/JB.184.24.7042-7046.2002
29
GageD. J. (2004). Infection and invasion of roots by symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing rhizobia during nodulation of temperate legumes.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.68280–300. 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.280-300.2004
30
GeddesB. A.GonzalezJ. E.OresnikI. J. (2014). Exopolysaccharide production in response to medium acidification is correlated with an increase in competition for nodule occupancy.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.271307–1317. 10.1094/Mpmi-06-14-0168-R
31
GyorfyZ.DraskovitsG.VernyikV.BlattnerF. F.GaalT.PosfaiG. (2015). Engineered ribosomal RNA operon copy-number variants of E. coli reveal the evolutionary trade-offs shaping rRNA operon number.Nucleic Acids Res.431783–1794. 10.1093/nar/gkv040
32
JonesK. M.KobayashiH.DaviesB. W.TagaM. E.WalkerG. C. (2007). How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium-Medicago model.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.5619–633. 10.1038/nrmicro1705
33
KarunakaranR.RamachandranV. K.SeamanJ. C.EastA. K.MouhsineB.MauchlineT. H.et al (2009). Transcriptomic analysis of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae in symbiosis with host plants Pisum sativum and Vicia cracca.J. Bacteriol.1914002–4014. 10.1128/JB.00165-09
34
KeyserH. H.BohloolB. B.HuT. S.WeberD. F. (1982). Fast-growing rhizobia isolated from root nodules of soybean.Science2151631–1632. 10.1126/science.215.4540.1631
35
KiersE. T.RousseauR. A.WestS. A.DenisonR. F. (2003). Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism.Nature42578–81. 10.1038/nature01931
36
KlappenbachJ. A.SaxmanP. R.ColeJ. R.SchmidtT. M. (2001). rrndb: the ribosomal RNA operon copy number database.Nucleic Acids Res.29181–184. 10.1093/nar/29.1.181
37
KohlerP. R. A.ZhengJ. Y.SchoffersE.RossbachS. (2010). Inositol catabolism, a key pathway in Sinorhizobium meliloti for competitive host nodulation.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.767972–7980. 10.1128/Aem.01972-10
38
LagaresA.CaetanoanollesG.NiehausK.LorenzenJ.LjunggrenH. D.PuhlerA.et al (1992). A Rhizobium meliloti lipopolysaccharide mutant altered in competitiveness for nodulation of Alfalfa.J. Bacteriol.1745941–5952. 10.1128/jb.174.18.5941-5952.1992
39
LedermannR.BartschI.MüllerB.WülserJ.FischerH. M. (2018). A functional general stress response of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens is required for early stages of host plant infection.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.31537–547. 10.1094/Mpmi-11-17-0284-R
40
LewinA.RosenbergC.Meyerz. A. H.WongC. H.NelsonL.ManenJ. F.et al (1987). Multiple host-specificity loci of the broad host range Rhizobium sp. NGR234 selected using the widely compatible legume Vigna unguiculata.Plant Mol. Biol.8447–459. 10.1007/BF00017990
41
LiD. M.AlexanderM. (1986). Bacterial growth rates and competition affect nodulation and root colonization by Rhizobium meliloti.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.52807–811.
42
MarchettiM.CatriceO.BatutJ.Masson-BoivinC. (2011). Cupriavidus taiwanensis bacteroids in Mimosa pudica indeterminate nodules are not terminally differentiated.Appl. Environ. Microb.772161–2164. 10.1128/Aem.02358-10
43
MarkwellJ.BlevinsD. (1999). The minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter: an exciting new tool for education in the plant sciences.Am. Biol. Teach.61672–676. 10.2307/4450800
44
MarxC. J.BringelF.ChistoserdovaL.MoulinL.FarhanU.HaqueM.et al (2012). Complete genome sequences of six strains of the genus Methylobacterium.J. Bacteriol.1944746–4748. 10.1128/Jb.01009-12
45
Masson-BoivinC.GiraudE.PerretX.BatutJ. (2009). Establishing nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes: how many rhizobium recipes?Trends Microbiol.17458–466. 10.1016/j.tim.2009.07.004
46
MergaertP.UchiumiT.AlunniB.EvannoG.CheronA.CatriceO.et al (2006). Eukaryotic control on bacterial cell cycle and differentiation in the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1035230–5235. 10.1073/pnas.0600912103
47
MonshupaneeT.Fa-AroonsawatS.ChungjatupornchaiW. (2006). A cyanobacterial strain with all chromosomal rRNA operons inactivated: a single nucleotide mutation of 23S rRNA confers temperature-sensitive phenotypes.Microbiology1521417–1425. 10.1099/mic.0.28691-0
48
MontielJ.DownieJ. A.FarkasA.BihariP.HerczegR.BálintB.et al (2017). Morphotype of bacteroids in different legumes correlates with the number and type of symbiotic NCR peptides.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1145041–5046. 10.1073/pnas.1704217114
49
MoulinL.KlonowskaA.CarolineB.BoothK.VriezenJ. A. C.MelkonianR.et al (2014). Complete genome sequence of Burkholderia phymatum STM815, a broad host range and efficient nitrogen-fixing symbiont of Mimosa species.Stand. Genomic Sci.9763–774. 10.4056/sigs.4861021
50
NanamiyaH.SatoM.MasudaK.SatoM.WadaT.SuzukiS.et al (2010). Bacillus subtilis mutants harbouring a single copy of the rRNA operon exhibit severe defects in growth and sporulation.Microbiology1562944–2952. 10.1099/mic.0.035295-0
51
NemergutD. R.KnelmanJ. E.FerrenbergS.BilinskiT.MelbourneB.JiangL.et al (2016). Decreases in average bacterial community rRNA operon copy number during succession.ISME J.101147–1156. 10.1038/ismej.2015.191
52
OkazakiS.YuhashiK. I.MinamisawaK. (2003). Quantitative and time-course evaluation of nodulation competitiveness of rhizobitoxine-producing Bradyrhizobium elkanii.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.45155–160. 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00132-6
53
OkeV.LongS. R. (1999). Bacteroid formation in the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.2641–646. 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)00035-1
54
OldroydG. E.MurrayJ. D.PooleP. S.DownieJ. A. (2011). The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis.Annu. Rev. Genet.45119–144. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132549
55
PastorinoG.Martinez AlcántaraV.MalbránI.VideiraL.SarinelliJ.BalattiP. A. (2015). Ensifer (Sinorhizobium) fredii interacted more efficiently than Bradyrhizobium japonicum with soybean.J. Agric. Ecol. Res. Int.210–19. 10.9734/JAERI/2015/13163
56
PerretX.BroughtonW. J.BrennerS. (1991). Canonical ordered cosmid library of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium species NGR234.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.881923–1927. 10.1073/pnas.88.5.1923
57
PerretX.KobayashiH.Collado-VidesJ. (2003). Regulation of expression of symbiotic genes in Rhizobium sp. NGR234.Indian J. Exp. Biol.411101–1113.
58
PerretX.StaehelinC.BroughtonW. J. (2000). Molecular basis of symbiotic promiscuity.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.64180–201. 10.1128/MMBR.64.1.180-201.2000
59
PooleP.RamachandranV.TerpolilliJ. (2018). Rhizobia: from saprophytes to endosymbionts.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.16291–303. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.171
60
PrentkiP.KrischH. M. (1984). In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment.Gene29303–313. 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90059-3
61
PueppkeS. G.BroughtonW. J. (1999). Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257 share exceptionally broad, nested host ranges.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.12293–318. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.4.293
62
QuandtJ.HynesM. F. (1993). Versatile suicide vectors which allow direct selection for gene replacement in Gram-negative bacteria.Gene12715–21. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90611-6
63
RenG. (2018). The Evolution of Determinate and Indeterminate Nodules Within the Papilionoideae Subfamily.Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen UniversityWageningen. 10.18174/429101
64
RollerB. R. K.StoddardS. F.SchmidtT. M. (2016). Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies.Nat. Microbiol.1:16160. 10.1038/Nmicrobiol.2016.160
65
RossW.GosinkK. K.SalomonJ.IgarashiK.ZouC.IshihamaA.et al (1993). A third recognition element in bacterial promoters - DNA-binding by the alpha-subunit of RNA-polymerase.Science2621407–1413. 10.1126/science.8248780
66
SaadM. M.MichaletS.FossouR. K.Putnik-DelićM.CrèvecoeurM.MeyerJ.et al (2018). Loss of NifQ leads to accumulation of porphyrins and altered metal-homeostasis in nitrogen-fixing symbioses.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.10.1094/MPMI-07-18-0188-R[Epub ahead of print].
67
SanderP.PrammanananT.BottgerE. C. (1996). Introducing mutations into a chromosomal rRNA gene using a genetically modified eubacterial host with a single rRNA operon.Mol. Microbiol.22841–848. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.01532.x
68
SarosoS.GlennA. R.DilworthM. J. (1984). Carbon utilization by free-living and bacteroid forms of cowpea Rhizobium strain NGR234.J. Gen. Microbiol.1301809–1814. 10.1099/00221287-130-7-1809
69
SchindelinJ.Arganda-CarrerasI.FriseE.KaynigV.LongairM.PietzschT.et al (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.Nat. Methods9676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019
70
SchmeisserC.LiesegangH.KrysciakD.BakkouN.Le QuéréA.WollherrA.et al (2009). Rhizobium sp. NGR234 possesses a remarkable number of secretion systems.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.754035–4045. 10.1128/AEM.00515-09
71
ShresthaP. M.NollM.LiesackW. (2007). Phylogenetic identity, growth-response time and rRNA operon copy number of soil bacteria indicate different stages of community succession.Environ. Microbiol.92464–2474. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01364.x
72
SomaA.IkeuchiY.KanemasaS.KobayashiK.OgasawaraN.OteT.et al (2003). An RNA-modifying enzyme that governs both the codon and amino acid specificities of isoleucine tRNA.Mol. Cell12689–698. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00346-0
73
SprentJ. I.ArdleyJ.JamesE. K. (2017). Biogeography of nodulated legumes and their nitrogen-fixing symbionts.New Phytol.21540–56. 10.1111/nph.14474
74
SprentJ. I.ArdleyJ. K.JamesE. K. (2013). From North to South: a latitudinal look at legume nodulation processes.S. Afr. J. Bot.8931–41. 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.06.011
75
SrivastavaA. K.SchlessingerD. (1990). Mechanism and regulation of bacterial ribosomal-RNA processing.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.44105–129. 10.1146/annurev.mi.44.100190.000541
76
StevensonB. S.SchmidtT. M. (2004). Life history implications of rRNA gene copy number in Escherichia coli.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.706670–6677. 10.1128/Aem.70.11.6670-6677.2004
77
TriplettE. W.SadowskyM. J. (1992). Genetics of competition for nodulation of legumes.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.46399–428. 10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.002151
78
UdvardiM.PooleP. S. (2013). Transport and metabolism in legume-rhizobia symbioses.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.64781–805. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120235
79
VipreyV.RosenthalA.BroughtonW. J.PerretX. (2000). Genetic snapshots of the Rhizobium species NGR234 genome.Genome Biol.1:research0014.1–14.17. 10.1186/gb-2000-1-6-research0014
80
XiaoT. T.SchilderinkS.MolingS.DeinumE. E.KondorosiÉFranssenH.et al (2014). Fate map of Medicago truncatula root nodules.Development1413517–3528. 10.1242/dev.110775
81
XuL. M.GeC.CuiZ.LiJ.FanH. (1995). Bradyrhizobium liaoningense sp. nov., isolated from the root nodules of soybeans.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.45706–711. 10.1099/00207713-45-4-706
82
YanoK.WadaT.SuzukiS.TagamiK.MatsumotoT.ShiwaY.et al (2013). Multiple rRNA operons are essential for efficient cell growth and sporulation as well as outgrowth in Bacillus subtilis.Microbiology1592225–2236. 10.1099/mic.0.067025-0
83
ZieglerD.MariottiA.PflügerV.SaadM.VogelG.TonollaM.et al (2012). In situ identification of plant-invasive bacteria with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.PLoS One7:e37189. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037189
Summary
Keywords
nitrogen fixation, nodulation, competition, rhizosphere, colonization
Citation
Cherni AE and Perret X (2019) Deletion of rRNA Operons of Sinorhizobium fredii Strain NGR234 and Impact on Symbiosis With Legumes. Front. Microbiol. 10:154. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00154
Received
19 October 2018
Accepted
22 January 2019
Published
13 February 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Ana E. Escalante, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico
Reviewed by
Esperanza Martinez-Romero, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico; Julie Ardley, Murdoch University, Australia
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2019 Cherni and Perret.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xavier Perret, xavier.perret@unige.ch
This article was submitted to Microbial Symbioses, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.