Abstract
Shiga toxin (Stx), encoded by stx genes located in prophage sequences, is the major agent responsible for the pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and is closely associated with the development of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Although numerous Stx prophage sequences have been reported as part of STEC bacterial genomes, the information about the genomic characterization of Stx-converting bacteriophages induced from STEC strains is relatively scarce. The objectives of this study were to genomically characterize two Stx-converting phages induced from environmental STEC strains and to evaluate their correlations with published Stx-converting phages and STEC strains of different origins. The Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and the Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw were induced from E. coli O103:H11 (RM8385) and E. coli O157:H7 (RM19259), respectively. Whole-genome sequencing of these phages was conducted on a MiSeq sequencer for genomic characterization. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative genomics were performed to determine the correlations between these two Stx-converting phages, 13 reference Stx-converting phages, and 10 reference STEC genomes carrying closely related Stx prophages. Both Stx-converting phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw had double-stranded DNA, with genome sizes of 50,953 and 61,072 bp, respectively. Approximately 40% of the annotated coding DNA sequences with the predicted functions were likely associated with the fitness for both phages and their bacterial hosts. The whole-genome–based phylogenetic analysis of these two Stx-converting phages and 13 reference Stx-converting phages revealed that the 15 Stx-converting phages were divided into three distinct clusters, and those from E. coli O157:H7, in particular, were distributed in each cluster, demonstrating the high genomic diversity of these Stx-converting phages. The genomes of Stx-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw shared a high-nucleotide similarity with the prophage sequences of the selected STEC isolates from the clinical and environmental origin. The findings demonstrate the genomic diversity of Stx-converting phages induced from different STEC strains and provide valuable insights into the dissemination of stx genes among E. coli population via the lysogenization of Stx-converting phages.
Introduction
Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are notorious foodborne pathogens that cause several human diseases, such as diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) (; White et al., 2016). The gastrointestinal tract of ruminant animals has been reported to be the primary reservoir of STEC, likely causing the contamination of products of animal origin and the surrounding environment, such as cross-contamination on produce farms (Sharma et al., 2019). Aside from E. coli O157:H7, certain non-O157 STEC strains are also frequently associated with foodborne outbreaks in recent years (; ; Valilis et al., 2018). For example, several outbreaks caused by E. coli O157:H7 have been reported in the United States between 2013 and 2020 and have been related to the contamination of leafy greens, beef products, and butter (, , ; USDA, 2020). Additionally, four foodborne outbreaks were caused by some of the most frequently occurring non-O157 STEC serogroups in the United States—including O26, O121, and O103—from 2019 to 2020, and STEC O103, in particular, was attributed to three foodborne outbreaks associated with contaminated Northfork bison, ground beef, and clover sprouts, causing 50 hospitalization and two patients with HUS (, ).
Shiga toxin (Stx), encoded by stx genes, is one of the primary virulence factors of STEC strains and can exhibit cytotoxicity to various target cells, such as endothelial cells (). Stx1 and stx2 genes are categorized into three subtypes (stx1a, stx1c, stx1d) and seven subtypes (stx2a through stx2g), respectively, based on nucleotide sequences (). Recently, more stx gene subtypes were identified along with the development of whole-genome sequencing technology and the subsequent sequencing of various STEC strains. For instance, Bai et al. found a novel stx2 subtype, classified as stx2h, from a pathogenic E. coli strain isolated from wild Himalayan marmot (). Previous studies have found that STEC strains harboring the stx2a subtype were the strains that are most frequently associated with the development of HUS in patients relative to the other subtypes (; ; ). Moreover, stx genes were confirmed to be located on Stx prophage sequences within the bacterial chromosome (; Tyler et al., 2004; Tóth et al., 2016). Thus, the characterization of Stx prophage facilitates understanding of the pathogenicity of STEC strains. Cooper et al. found two outbreak E. coli O145:H28 strains originally shared a close evolutionary relationship with E. coli O157:H7 strains, such as E. coli Sakai and EDL933, but were subsequently evolved to lineage-independent pathogenicity by acquiring additional virulence factors, including a Stx2a prophage and a large virulence plasmid (). Forde et al. evaluated two STEC O111:H- strains isolated from HUS patients related to a foodborne outbreak in Australia and found that one STEC O111 strain containing a total of four Stx prophages was more virulent than the other strain that harbored two Stx prophages ().
Stx prophages can be induced from STEC strains by different external stresses and subsequently released in the environment as Stx-converting phages, which are capable of infecting other susceptible strains and pose a risk of virulence gene transfer. Bacteriophage 933W, a well-studied Stx-converting phage, can self-induce from E. coli O157:H7 EDL933 strain and subsequently infect other susceptible E. coli strains to form a new lysogen (). Stx-converting phages are also highly associated with the evolution of pathogens and result in the increased pathogenicity of these pathogens. During the 2011 German outbreak of contaminated sprouts, a new pathogenic E. coli O104:H4 strain was isolated and identified to harbor major virulence factors from both enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), causing 54 deaths (). The enteroaggregative hemorrhagic E. coli (EAHEC) O104:H4 outbreak strain was demonstrated to evolve from EAEC through the acquisition of a Stx2a-converting phage (). Furthermore, Bai et al. found that several clinical isolates from diarrheal patients were STEC/enterotoxigenic E. coli hybrids, which were also related to the acquisition of Stx-converting phages (). These findings suggest that the emergence and the evolution of STEC strains are closely associated with the transduction of Stx-converting phages.
Although numerous Stx prophages have been studied and shown to be one of the key elements of various complete STEC genome sequences, little is known about the genomic characterization of the Stx-converting phages induced from STEC strains (; Smith et al., 2012; ; ). Here, we aimed to genomically characterize induced Stx1-converting phages Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw and to evaluate their genetic correlation with known Stx-converting phages and STEC pathogens from different sources via comparative genomics.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Bacteriophages
Two STEC strains—E. coli O103:H11 strain RM8385 and E. coli O157:H7 strain RM19259—were initially isolated from cattle feces and river samples, respectively, and stored at the culture collections of the Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit in the US Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Center. Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw were induced from RM8385 and RM19259 strains, respectively, by use of mitomycin C (0.5 μg/mL), followed by single-plaque purification and phage morphology observation via transmission electron microscopy as previously described (Supplementary Figure S1; Zhang et al., 2020). An E. coli strain ATCC700078 (WG5) was used to propagate Stx-converting phages. All bacterial strains used in this study were stored at −80°C and grown in 10 mL Luria-Bertani (LB, Difco, Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) at 37°C with shaking at 175 rpm prior to use.
Phage Propagation and DNA Extraction
Both Stx-converting phages—Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw—were enriched in 400 mL no-salt, soft top (NS-ST) broth (10 g bacto-tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 10 mM MgSO4/L) with the host strain E. coli WG5 at 37°C with shaking at 100 rpm overnight for phage propagation. The propagated phages were filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane syringe filter, followed by concentration using 50K Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter columns (Merck Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany). After CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation at 131,300 × g for 24 h, the CsCl-treated phages were washed and resuspended in SM buffer using 50K Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter columns (Merck Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany). DNase I (100 U/mL) was added to the phage lysates, and samples were incubated at 37°C for 60 min to remove residual bacteria DNA. Phage DNA was extracted by Norgen phage DNA extraction kit (Norgen Biotek, Ontario, Canada) and purified using DNeasy PowerClean Pro Cleanup Kit (QIAGEN Sciences, Germantown, United States) per the manufacturer’s instruction.
Phage Whole-Genome Sequencing
Phage DNA libraries were constructed as previously described (Zhang et al., 2019). Briefly, Nanodrop 8000 and Qubit 2.0 were used to determine the quality and concentration of phage DNA samples, respectively. Two hundred nanograms of DNA was fragmented to 550 bp with an M220 Focused Ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, United States) and used for DNA library construction with a TruSeq® Nano DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) per the manufacturer’s instructions. An Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform with MiSeq reagent kit v2 (500-cycle) was used for loading the libraries and sequencing, generating approximately 5 million and 3.8 million paired-end (2 × 250 bp) sequence reads for phage Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw, respectively.
Phage Genome Assembly and Annotation
Assembly and annotation of the phage sequences were performed as previously described (Zhang et al., 2019). Briefly, quality control of the raw sequence reads was performed using FASTQC and Trimmomatic (), with a trimming quality threshold of Q30. De novo assembly of the remaining quality reads was performed using SPAdes version 3.13.0 on the Kbase Server with a contig length set to >10,000 bp (; ), and three resulting contigs for Lys8385Vzw and two resulting contigs for Lys19259Vzw were obtained. The resulting contigs of each phage were subjected to blastn against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database1. Subsequently, the final two contigs from each phage, sharing high nucleotide sequence similarity with the reference Stx-converting phages/Stx prophages obtained from the NCBI database, were identified as Stx-converting phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw, respectively. The genome annotation was conducted using both Prokka (Seemann, 2014) and the RAST Server (). The annotation was confirmed and curated using Uniprot (), open reading frame finder (Geneious version 11.0.4), and BLASTP2. tRNA was predicted using tRNAscan-SE web server (). ResFinder (version 3.0) and VirulenceFinder (version 2.0) were used to screen for antibiotic resistance genes and virulence genes (Zankari et al., 2012; ). The phage packaging mechanisms of Stx-converting phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw were analyzed via PhageTerm with the default setting ().
Phylogenetic Analysis of 15 Stx-Converting Phages From Different Origins
Thirteen complete genome sequences of Stx-converting phages, including two Shigella phages, induced from the bacterial strains rather than the Stx prophage sequences extracted from bacterial genome sequences, were downloaded from the NCBI database and used to compare with the Stx-converting phages isolated in this study by phylogenetic analysis. Multiple sequence alignments were performed on the whole-genome sequences of Stx-converting phages with the MAFFT algorithm using Geneious (version 11.1.5). The phylogenetic tree was performed using MEGA-X with the maximum likelihood method and further visualized using the ITOL web server (; ). GenBank accession numbers of all reference phages are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Comparative Analysis of Stx-Converting Phages, Stx Prophages, and STEC Strains
Based on the phylogenetic analysis, the four most closely related phages, including Lys8385Vzw, Stx-converting phage 1717, Lys19259Vzw, and bacteriophage 933W, were selected for further comparison of genomic characteristics. Comparative genomic analysis was performed using Artemis 18.0.3 and Easyfig_2.2.3, with a minimum nucleotide sequence identity of 70% (; Sullivan et al., 2011).
Additionally, sequences between Stx-converting phage and the Stx prophage from their corresponding bacterial genomes were compared to evaluate genomic alterations during prophage induction from their bacterial hosts. Stx prophage sequences were predicted from the complete bacterial genomes of E. coli O103:H11 (RM8385) and E. coli O157:H7 (RM19259) using PHASTER, Prophage Hunter and Vibrant, and manually curated to avoid misprediction (; Song et al., 2019; ). The resulting Stx prophage sequences were further used to compare with the Stx-converting phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw induced from the same host strains. The comparative genomics was visualized using Easyfig_2.2.3 with a minimum nucleotide sequence identity set to 70% (Sullivan et al., 2011; ; ).
Both complete genome sequences of phage Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw were subjected to blastn searches against the NCBI database3. As a result, 10 different STEC reference genomes were obtained based on the high nucleotide sequence identity of their Stx prophage sequences to either genome of phage Lys8385Vzw (n = 5) or Lys19259Vzw (n = 5). Subsequently, the sequences of each Stx-converting phage (Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw) and its five corresponding STEC reference genomes, which contained similar Stx prophage sequences, were compared and visualized with specific sequence segments of high similarity using BRIG with default settings (). The accession numbers of STEC strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers
The complete genome sequences of Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers of MT225100 and MT225101, respectively.
Results
General Genomic Features of Stx1-Converting Phage Lys8385Vzw
Phage Lys8385Vzw had double-stranded DNA with a genome size of 50,953 bp and an average G + C content of 51.6% (Figure 1A). A total of 68 coding DNA sequences (CDSs) were annotated, including 24 with unknown functions (hypothetical proteins) and 44 with predicted functions (Supplementary Table S3). A total of 17 CDSs encoded putative proteins that were associated with phage morphogenesis, including capsid protein, structural proteins, tail assembly protein, portal proteins, and tail proteins. Two CDSs with the predicted lysis protein in the phage Lys8385Vzw genome shared a high nucleotide sequence similarity with the CDSs annotated with spainin and holin in Escherichia phage BP-4795 (88.2% identity) and phage ArgO145 (100% identity), respectively, and the both CDSs were related to the lysis of bacterial cells and the release of phage progenies (Young, 2014). Additionally, two putative terminases were identified to be associated with the phage DNA packaging of bacteriophage (). Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw also contained a CDS annotated with the predicted function of integrase, which was previously determined to assist with the integration of the phage genome into the bacterial chromosome (). Additionally, six CDSs in phage Lys8385Vzw were predicted as the genetic regulatory functions, such as repressor, regulator, and antitermination protein Q, in particular, which were associated with the regulation of phage late-gene expression (). Most importantly, phage Lys8385Vzw also contained the annotated CDS with regard to the type III secretion system effector NleG7 in addition to the virulence factor of stx1a. No antibiotic-resistant gene was found in the genome of phage Lys8385Vzw.
FIGURE 1
General Genomic Features of Stx2-Converting Phage Lys19259Vzw
Phage Lys19259Vzw contained double-stranded DNA 61,072 bp in length, with an average G + C content of 49.2% (Figure 1B). Eighty-five CDSs were annotated in the genome of Lys19259Vzw, and 38 of which were with the predicted functions (Supplementary Table S4). The CDSs related to phage morphogenesis, such as phage capsid proteins and tail fiber proteins, were also predicted in the phage genome. Additionally, phage Lys19259Vzw carried the CDSs with the putative functions associated with cell lysis, including holin and lysis protein (Young, 2014). Furthermore, the lambda red recombineering system-coding sequences, including phage exonuclease Exo, phage recombination protein Bet, and regulator host-nuclease inhibitor protein Gam that were associated with phage DNA recombination, were annotated in the phage genome (). Lys19259Vzw also contained the CDS annotated with the predicted function of integrase. A total of 10 CDSs with the predicted regulatory functions were found in phage Lys19259Vzw genome, including antitermination protein Q, Cro, CI, CII, CIII, and N, which were related to lysogenic conversion (). Phage Lys19259Vzw carried stx2a as the virulent factor and three tRNAs, including two tRNAs-Arg and one tRNA-Met, around the stx2a gene. No antibiotic-resistant genes were found in the phage genome.
Phylogenetic Tree Reveals the Diversity of Stx-Converting Phages
Fifteen Stx-converting phage sequences, consisting of 13 reference phage genomes obtained from NCBI, phage Lys8385Vzw, and phage Lys19259Vzw, were used to determine the evolutionary relationships. The results showed that these 15 Stx-converting phages were categorized into three distinct clusters: cluster 1, cluster 2, and cluster 3 (Figure 2). Cluster 1 was the main cluster and was composed of 12 Stx-converting phages, including Lys19259Vzw, 933W, and two Shigella phages. Cluster 2 contained only Stx1-converting phage AU5s, which was isolated from a clinical E. coli O157 strain in Australia, and cluster 3 included Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage 1717. The phylogenetic result coincided with the classification of phage morphology: all of the phages classified in cluster 1 and cluster 2 belonged to the Podoviridae family, and the phages classified in cluster 3 belonged to the Siphoviridae family. Moreover, cluster 1 was further divided into three different clades: clade 1, clade 2, and clade 3. Clade 1 contained two Shigella phages, Ss-VASD and 75/02 Stx, and two Escherichia phages, including phi191 and Lys12581Vzw. Furthermore, Lys12581Vzw, isolated from an outbreak STEC O145 strain, shared high sequence similarity (84% coverage and 98% identity) to Shigella phages Ss-VASD, suggesting that Stx-converting phage had potentially infected different bacterial species. All of the Stx-converting phages, including Lys19259Vzw, in clade 2 and clade 3 were from various STEC O157 strains isolated from different sources, such as river and clinical samples; the results likely indicated the diversity of Stx-converting phages from diverse STEC O157 strains.
FIGURE 2
Comparative genomics of Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage 1717 showed that the two phages had approximately an 11 kb difference in the length (Figure 3A), which primarily contained several different regulatory genes, including Cro, CI, CII, CIII, and N, related to the lytic-lysogenic switch in the phage 1717 genome; these findings likely differentiate the lifecycle of these two Stx-converting phages. Phage Lys8385Vzw and 1717 also contained the CDSs found in most siphophages, which were annotated with the predicted functions associated with phage packaging, assembly, and infection, such as terminase, major capsid proteins, tail proteins, tail measure proteins, and portal proteins. However, comparative genomics for phages Lys19259Vzw and 933W indicated that most CDSs coding for proteins with known functions in Lys19259Vzw shared a high identity to their counterparts in bacteriophage 933W (Figure 3B). However, low nucleotide sequence similarity (<70%) between these two phages was observed in several CDSs encoding the proteins, such as a few hypothetical proteins, integrase intA, and two phage anti-repressor protein Ant. Moreover, phage Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw contained the stx2 gene and the regulatory genes associated with the production of Stx in bacteria, which were 100% identical in nucleotide sequence to their respective counterparts in the phage 933W, suggesting that Lys19259Vzw might have similar capabilities as the well-characterized phage 933W in contributing to the development of bacterial pathogenicity ().
FIGURE 3
Genomic Differences Between the Stx Prophages Predicted and the Stx-Converting Phages Induced From the Same Bacterial Hosts
To determine the change in nucleotide sequences that occurred during the prophage induction process, two Stx prophage sequences predicted from the genomes of E. coli O103:H11 (RM8385) and E. coli O157:H7 (RM19259), one prophage of each bacterial strain, were used to compare with Stx-converting phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw, respectively (Figure 4). According to the blastn results, the genomic structure of Stx-converting phage Lys8385Vzw was rearranged into two parts compared with the corresponding Stx prophage sequence, and the CDSs located in the first part encoded the proteins primarily related to infection, assembly, and packaging mechanisms; those in the second part were associated with virulence, regulation, cell lysis, and phage replication (Figure 4A). Additionally, the packaging mechanisms of Lys8385Vzw belonged to the cos phage with the 3′ cohesive ends, and the cos site (CGCCCCCCCT) was identified at the end of Lys8385Vzw genome (sequence position, base pairs 50,977– 50,953). In contrast, the blastn results showed that Stx-converting phage Lys19259Vzw shared 100% nucleotide sequence identity of the corresponding Stx prophage sequence (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the packaging mechanism of phage Lys19259Vzw was identified as Mu-like class via PhageTerm in that the phage DNA termini corresponded to fragments of the host DNA (). Furthermore, the predicted Stx2 prophage within RM19259 contained seven more CDSs than that in the Lys19259Vzw genome. Two CDSs coding for IS3 family transposase ISEc25 and IS3 family transposase IS1203 were annotated in the middle of the prophage sequence (chromosome position of RM19259: base pairs 299,519–300,709) but were absent in phage Lys19259Vzw genome. The phenomenon likely indicated the occurrence of transposition during the prophage induction process. The other five CDSs located at the 3′ end of the prophage genome (chromosome position of RM19259: base pairs 338,419–343,278) were predicted to encode integrase, putative prophage DNA injection protein, DNA transfer protein, DUF2824 family protein, and phage_tail_NK domain-containing protein.
FIGURE 4
Genome Comparison Between Stx-Converting Phages and Stx Prophages Predicted From STEC Strains From Different Sources
Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw were compared with five selected reference STEC genomes to evaluate their correlations. Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw shared more than 95% nucleotide identity over 71–100% coverage of the Stx prophage sequences within the five STEC strains, including E. coli O103:H11 (2013C-4225), E. coli O165:H25 (88-3001), E. coli O165:H25 (2012C-4227), E. coli O165:H25 (2013C-4830), and E. coli O172:H25 (2013C-3492). Lys8385Vzw shared the highest nucleotide sequence identity (99.86% identity and 100% coverage) to the Stx1 prophage from the STEC O103:H11 strain (2013C-4225) (Figure 5A). Additionally, the Stx2a prophage within E. coli O165:H25 strain (88-3001) shared 95.58% identity over 83% coverage of the nucleotide sequence of Stx-converting phage Lys8385Vzw but lacked some regulation-related genes, such as those coding for LexA family transcriptional repressor, and antitermination protein Q. Furthermore, Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw shared both 99.99% nucleotide sequence identity and 99.99% coverage to the Stx prophage sequences obtained from five reference genomes of the STEC O157:H7 strains, including TW14359, EC4115, 2010C-3142, JEONG-1266, and 147 (Figure 5B). The results indicated the potential lysogenization of Stx-converting phages among various E. coli strains isolated from different samples, such as clinical specimens and environmental materials.
FIGURE 5
Discussion
Various prophages are present in bacterial genomes containing some critical genes associated with bacterial pathogenesis and are considered as mobile genetic elements that play important roles in bacterial evolution (). Stx prophages embedded in bacterial genomes are highly related to the human pathogenicity of STEC strains, resulting in HUS with severe complications after infection (). Because of the advancement of whole-genome sequencing technology, several studies have revealed the genomic evidence indicating that acquisition of additional Stx prophages is attributed to the enhanced pathogenicity of many outbreak-associated STEC strains (; ). However, the accuracy of the prophage screening and prediction, such as for Stx prophages, may vary based on the use of different computational tools. The results may also affect the downstream analyses regarding the phage-associated bacterial pathogenicity (; ; Song et al., 2019). Previous studies have confirmed that Stx-converting phages, as free phages released from the STEC strains through Stx prophage induction, posed a risk of infecting susceptible E. coli strains and transferring stx genes to form new lysogens (; Smith et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2020). Therefore, the study of induced phages, such as Stx-converting phages, is important for understanding the phage-mediated bacterial pathogenicity and the emergence of new STEC pathogens. However, the information regarding the number of genomically characterized Stx-converting phages in the public database is scarce. In this study, two Stx-converting phages—Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw—induced from E. coli O103:H11 (RM8385) and E. coli O157:H7 (RM19259) strains, respectively, were subjected to whole-genome sequencing and genomic characterization to understand the role of these Stx-converting phages associated with different STEC strains.
The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) provides recommendations for classifying phages based on morphology and nucleotide sequences (). In this study, the phylogenetic results aligned with the morphologies of the 15 selected Stx-converting phages. Additionally, the results of comparative genomics among these phages demonstrated the high homologies of the genes encoding phage assembly and infection-associated proteins, such as major capsid proteins, portal proteins, structural proteins, and tail proteins. Several studies have also confirmed that the genes encoding structural proteins, such as major capsid and tail fiber proteins, were the primary conservative genes in the phage genomes (; ). A multilocus sequence typing for the genome of 70 Stx-converting phages, induced from STEC isolates, found that approximately 70% short-tailed phages shared a highly conserved tail fiber gene (Smith et al., 2007b). Furthermore, tail fiber proteins were related to the recognition of bacterial receptor proteins on the bacterial membrane for successful phage infection (Yosef et al., 2017; ; Yehl et al., 2019). Another study conducted by Smith et al. (2007a) observed that short-tailed Stx-converting phages, such as Stx2-converting phage vB_EcoP_24B (also known as Φ24B), could recognize the same bacterial outer membrane YaeT (currently called BamA) via the phage tail fiber proteins. The phylogenetic analysis of this study also showed that all the short-tailed Stx-converting phages contained tail fiber genes sharing a high nucleotide identity to that in phage Φ24B (Supplementary Figure S2A). Although siphophage Lys8385Vzw genome did not contain the similar tail fiber genes, the gene with the predicted function of host specificity J protein, involved in the phage attachment of the host receptor and the induction of phage DNA ejection, was identified in the Lys8385Vzw, sharing 88% nucleotide sequence identity over 100% coverage with the counterpart in phage 1717 (data not shown) (). Thus, the results indicated that the long-tailed Stx-converting phages—belonging to the Siphoviridae family—had different functional tail proteins to recognize the host receptors. These findings suggest a strong correlation between phage conservative tail proteins and the phage adsorption capability, subsequently resulting in successful Stx-converting phage lysogenization.
The integrase gene plays an important part in the lysogenic cycle of lysogenic phage (). Phage integrase is an enzyme associated with integrating a phage genome into the bacterial chromosomes at certain attachment sites (attP and attB) through a site-specific recombination process (; ). A previous study indicates that the genetic diversity of the integrase-coding genes among various Stx prophages was related to the different insertion sites of these prophages within the bacterial chromosome (Smith et al., 2007b). The results in this study showed that the predicted Stx1a prophage was integrated into the dusA site, encoding tRNA dihydroxyuridine synthase A, within the genome of RM8385 strain, whereas the predicted Stx2a prophage was integrated into the tRNA-Arg site in the bacterial genome of RM19259 strain. The results of the phylogenetic analysis showed that Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw had a unique integrase gene as compared to other Stx-converting phages in this study (Supplementary Figure S2B). The same insertion site dusA was also found in novel Stx2k prophages embedded in three STEC strains isolated from patients and raw beef in China (Yang et al., 2020). Furthermore, a correlation between integrase sequences and phage insertion sites within the bacterial host chromosome was studied (Steyert et al., 2012; Yin et al., 2015). A previous study demonstrated that the phage insertions were governed by the phage integrases among Stx prophages in the locus of enterocyte effacement–negative STEC strains, because these Stx prophages carried the identical integrases utilizing the same insertion site (Steyert et al., 2012). Another study showed that distinct phage sequence types (PSTs)—PST1, PST2, and PST3—were correlated with different insertion sites (Yin et al., 2015). The authors found the phages in PST1 cluster all inserted in the wrbA site, encoding a TrpR binding protein, whereas those in both PST2 and PST3 clusters, containing the identical int sequences, were inserted in the tRNA-argW site. These findings are consistent with the present results that the Stx prophages similar to phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw could use the same insertion site (dusA and tRNA-Arg) in their corresponding bacterial strains of different origins. Specifically, Stx1 prophage of E. coli strain 2013C-4225 that shared identical integrase-coding sequence with Lys8385Vzw was also inserted in dusA gene, whereas the five Stx2 prophages that shared the identical integrase with phage Lys19259vzw were inserted into the tRNA-Arg site (data not shown). Importantly, contrary to the λ superinfection immunity model, previous studies have demonstrated that a number of STEC strains carried two or more Stx prophages within different insertion sites (; ; Serra-Moreno et al., 2007). Together, these findings reveal an important role of integrase in the lysogenic cycle, which is linked to the lysogenization of Stx-converting phages in the bacterial genomes, subsequently resulting in the evolution of STEC strains.
In the present study, Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw and Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw contained different numbers of tRNAs and regulatory protein-coding genes. Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw contained three tRNA (two tRNAs-Arg and one tRNA-Met) in the phage genome. Interestingly, this study also found that tRNA-Arg was the most frequently found tRNA in the bacterial genome of RM19259 (data not shown). Previous studies indicated that tRNAs within the phage genome could compensate for differences in codon and/or amino acid usage between viruses and hosts to favor an efficient protein synthesis (; ). Thus, tRNAs carried by lysogenic phages likely showed a codon usage bias close to the hosts, contributing to the protein synthesis of prophages and the trait acquisition of the hosts (). Additionally, five regulatory protein-coding sequences, including phage repressor CI, antirepressor Cro, regulatory CII, antirepressor CIII, and early gene regulator N, were present in Stx2-converting phage Lys19259Vzw but absent in Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw. The presence of these regulatory genes in both Stx1- and Stx2-converting phages was highly associated with regulation of Stx prophage induction process, triggering a lytic cycle of Stx prophages to lyse bacterial host and release Stx-converting phages in the environment (Smith et al., 2012; Steyert et al., 2012; ). These findings are consistent with our previous study that Lys19259Vzw had a higher induction efficiency than Lys8385Vzw regardless of the type of inducing factors likely due to a higher number of lytic-lysogenic switch genes in phage Lys19259Vzw than Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw (Zhang et al., 2020).
The correlation between Stx prophage induction and Stx production, the primary virulence factors of STEC causing severe human disease, has been demonstrated in several studies (Zhang et al., 2000; ; ). It has been showed that the expression of stx genes was regulated by the transcription of antiterminator Q and the late promoter pR, both located downstream of stx genes (). In the current study, the phylogenetic results showed that the antitermination Q gene in Lys19259Vzw shared a high nucleotide identity with the counterfeit, also known as Q933, in phage 933W; the phage antitermination Q gene in phage Lys8385Vzw was different from other Stx-converting phages (Supplementary Figure S2C). A previous study reported that Certain STEC strains carrying the antiterminator Q933 gene within the Stx prophage sequence could produce higher levels of Stx than those harboring other types of antiterminator Q genes, such as Q21, within the Stx prophage sequence (; ). These findings infer that lysogenization of phage Lys19259Vzw, which carried the Q933 gene, may contribute to the high pathogenicity of the lysogen via producing a high level of Stx. However, the effects of the lysogenization of Stx-converting phage Lys8385Vzw on promoting Stx production from the new lysogen should be further investigated.
Because of the lysogenic capability of Stx-converting phages, the phages serve as mobile genetic elements contributing to the change of biological characteristics in bacteria; thus, understanding the functions of different genes present in the phage genome is important. In this study, among the genes predicted in the Stx-converting phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw, there were 11 types of functions identified as previously described (Song et al., 2019). These two Stx-converting phages contained genes coding for the functional proteins related to phage survival, such as lysis protein, terminase, and DNA-binding protein. These genes are commonly found in the genomes of most lytic and lysogenic phages and associated with phage DNA replication and packaging, lysis of bacterial cell membrane, and the release of phage progenies (; ; ; Xu, 2015; ). Specifically, both Stx-converting phages in this study contain the genes encoding lysis protein, which is significantly expressed and accumulated in the bacterial cytoplasm at the end of the phage induction process (; , ). The gene coding for phage N-6-adenine-methyltransferase was identified in both phages Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw, and the protein was highly involved in the process of phage infection to defend the bacterial restriction-modification system (). Additionally, Stx1-converting phage Lys8385Vzw had the gene encoding the HD family hydrolase, which could bind to specific sites of the host bacterial cell membrane and subsequently disrupt the structure of the bacterial cell wall to facilitate the injection of phage DNA into the infected bacteria (). Furthermore, both Stx-converting phages also carry some genes encoding proteins that are beneficial to their STEC hosts, including transcriptional repressors associated with the virulence gene expression, and the enhancement of STEC colonization in the gastrointestinal tract (; ; ). A previous study found that some lysogenic phages carried additional cargo genes associated with the difference of bacterial phenotype or bacterial fitness characteristics, such as colonization capability, rather than with the biological features of the phages (). These findings, along with those from the current study, indicate that Stx-converting phages contain two primary groups of genes: one group is associated with phage replication and the other group is related to the regulation of their bacterial hosts, particularly for bacterial pathogenicity.
Overall, this study provides the next-generation sequencing and genomic characterization of Stx1-converting and Stx2-converting phages, both induced from environmental STEC strains. The comparative genomics shows the genetic evidence regarding the potential dissemination of stx genes among the bacterial population via phage lysogenization. These findings provide additional information on the diversity of Stx-converting phages and contribute valuable insights into the role of Stx-converting phage in the evolution of bacterial pathogenicity through lysogenization in STEC strains. Additional studies are needed to confirm the predicted protein functions of the Stx-converting phages and the coevolution of Stx-converting phages with their STEC hosts.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, MT225100; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, MT225101.
Author contributions
YZ performed phage induction and isolation, whole-genome sequencing, and genomic analysis and authored the manuscript. Y-TL performed genomic analyses and authored the manuscript. AS performed whole-genome sequencing. VW conceived and supervised the study, designed experiments, and reviewed drafts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the USDA-ARS CRIS projects 2030-42000-050-00D.
Acknowledgments
We thank Angeline L. Hsu and Leslie A. Harden for their assistance in phage induction, isolation, and purification experiments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.587696/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1Morphology of Stx-converting phages observed by transmission electron microscopy. (A) Phage Lys8385Vzw has a long and non-contractile tail. (B) Phage Lys19259Vzw has a short tail, composed of six short subterminal fibers.
Supplementary Figure 2Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of two Stx-converting phages, Lys8385Vzw and Lys19259Vzw (highlighted with blue font), and 13 reference Stx-converting phages from the NCBI database. (A) Tail fiber, (B) integrase, (C) antitermination Q. No predicted gene coding for tail fiber was found in the genome of phage Lys8385Vzw. The scale bar represents the percent divergence.
Footnotes
1.^https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=Nucleotides
2.^https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=Proteins
3.^https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=Nucleotides
References
1
AdriaenssensE. M.KrupovicM.KnezevicP.AckermannH. W.BarylskiJ.BristerJ. R.et al (2017). Taxonomy of prokaryotic viruses: 2016 update from the ICTV bacterial and archaeal viruses subcommittee.Arch. Virol.1621153–1157. 10.1007/s00705-016-3173-4
2
AhmadA.ZurekL. (2006). Evaluation of the anti-terminator Q933 gene as a marker for Escherichia coli O157:H7 with high Shiga toxin production.Curr. Microbiol.53324–328. 10.1007/s00284-006-0089-3
3
AkhterS.AzizR. K.EdwardsR. A. (2012). PhiSpy: a novel algorithm for finding prophages in bacterial genomes that combines similarity-and composition-based strategies.Nucleic Acids Res.40:e126. 10.1093/nar/gks406
4
AlikhanN. F.PettyN. K.Ben ZakourN. L.BeatsonS. A. (2011). BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons.BMC Genomics12:402. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402
5
AllisonH. E.SergeantM. J.JamesC. E.SaundersJ. R.SmithD. L.SharpR. J.et al (2003). Immunity profiles of wild-type and recombinant shiga-like toxin-encoding bacteriophages and characterization of novel double lysogens.Infect. Immun.713409–3418. 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3409-3418.2003
6
ArkinA. P.CottinghamR. W.HenryC. S.HarrisN. L.StevensR. L.MaslovS.et al (2018). KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase.Nat. Biotechnol.36566–569. 10.1038/nbt.4163
7
ArndtD.GrantJ. R.MarcuA.SajedT.PonA.LiangY.et al (2016). PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool.Nucleic Acids Res.44W16–W21. 10.1093/nar/gkw387
8
ArndtD.MarcuA.LiangY.WishartD. S. (2017). Phast, phaster and phastest: tools for finding prophage in bacterial genomes.Brief. Bioinform.201560–1567. 10.1093/bib/bbx121
9
AzizR. K.BartelsD.BestA.DeJonghM.DiszT.EdwardsR. A.et al (2008). The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.BMC Genomics.9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
10
BaiX.FuS.ZhangJ.FanR.XuY.SunH.et al (2018). Identification and pathogenomic analysis of an Escherichia coli strain producing a novel Shiga toxin 2 subtype.Sci. Rep.8:6756. 10.1038/s41598-018-25233-x
11
BaiX.ZhangJ.AmbikanA.JernbergC.EhrichtR.ScheutzF.et al (2019). Molecular characterization and comparative genomics of clinical hybrid shiga toxin-producing and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC/ETEC) strains in sweden.Sci. Rep.9:5619. 10.1038/s41598-019-42122-z
12
Bailly-BechetM.VergassolaM.RochaE. (2007). Causes for the intriguing presence of tRNAs in phages.Genome Res.171486–1495. 10.1101/gr.6649807
13
BaldingC.BromleyS. A.PickupR. W.SaundersJ. R. (2005). Diversity of phage integrases in Enterobacteriaceae: development of markers for environmental analysis of temperate phages.Environ. Microbiol.71558–1567. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00845.x
14
BatemanA.MartinM. J.O’DonovanC.MagraneM.ApweilerR.AlpiE.et al (2015). UniProt: a hub for protein information.Nucleic Acids Res.43D204–D212. 10.1093/nar/gku989
15
BernhardtT. G.RoofW. D.YoungR. (2000). Genetic evidence that the bacteriophage φX174 lysis protein inhibits cell wall synthesis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.974297–4302. 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4297
16
BeutinL.MartinA. (2012). Outbreak of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O104: H4 infection in Germany causes a paradigm shift with regard to human pathogenicity of STEC strains.J. Food Prot.75408–418. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-452
17
BolgerA. M.LohseM.UsadelB. (2014). trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.Bioinformatics302114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
18
BreschkinA. M.MosigG. (1977). Multiple interactions of a DNA-binding protein in vivo. I. Gene 32 mutations of phage T4 inactivate different steps in DNA replication and recombination.J. Mol. Biol.112279–294. 10.1016/S0022-2836(77)80144-7
19
BrooksJ. E.RobertsR. J. (1982). Modification profiles of bacterial genomes.Nucleic Acids Res.10913–934. 10.1093/nar/10.3.913
20
BrussowH.CanchayaC.HardtW.-D. (2004). Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.68560–602. 10.1128/mmbr.68.3.560-602.2004
21
BullwinkleT. J.SamorodnitskyD.RosatiR. C.KoudelkaG. B. (2012). Determinants of bacteriophage 933W repressor DNA binding specificity.PLoS One7:e34563. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034563
22
CaldwellB. J.BellC. E. (2019). Structure and mechanism of the Red recombination system of bacteriophage λ.Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.14733–46. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.03.005
23
CarverT. J.RutherfordK. M.BerrimanM.RajandreamM. A.BarrellB. G.ParkhillJ. (2005). ACT: the artemis comparison tool.Bioinformatics213422–3423. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti553
24
CasjensS. R.HendrixR. W. (2015). Bacteriophage lambda: early pioneer and still relevant.Virology479310–330. 10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.010
25
CastilloD.KauffmanK.HussainF.KalatzisP.RørboN.PolzM. F.et al (2018). Widespread distribution of prophage-encoded virulence factors in marine Vibrio communities.Sci. Rep.8:9973. 10.1038/s41598-018-28326-9
26
CatalanoC. E. (2000). The terminase enzyme from bacteriophage lambda: a DNA-packaging machine.Cell. Mol. Life Sci.57128–148. 10.1007/s000180050503
27
CDC (2014). E. coli (Escherichia coli).Atlanta, GA: CDC.
28
CDC (2017). National Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) Surveillance.Atlanta, GA: CDC.
29
CDC (2018). Multistate Outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infections Linked to Leafy Greens (Final Update).Atlanta, GA: CDC.
30
CDC (2019). Reports of Selected E. coli Outbreak Investigations.Atlanta, GA: CDC.
31
CDC (2020). Outbreak of E. coli Infections Linked to Clover Sprouts∗. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2020/o103h2-02-20/index.html(accessed April 18, 2020).
32
ChanY. S.NgT. B. (2016). Shiga toxins: from structure and mechanism to applications.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1001597–1610. 10.1007/s00253-015-7236-3
33
ColavecchioA.D’SouzaY.TompkinsE.JeukensJ.FreschiL.Emond-RheaultJ. G.et al (2017). Prophage integrase typing is a useful indicator of genomic diversity in Salmonella enterica.Front. Microbiol.8:1283. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01283
34
CooperK. K.MandrellR. E.LouieJ. W.KorlachJ.ClarkT. A.ParkerC. T.et al (2014). Complete genome sequences of two Escherichia coli O145: H28 outbreak strains of food origin.Genome Announc.22e482–e414. 10.1128/genomeA.00482-14
35
Del CoglianoM. E.PintoA.GoldsteinJ.ZottaE.OchoaF.Fernández-BrandoR. J.et al (2018). Relevance of bacteriophage 933W in the development of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).Front. Microbiol.9:3104. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03104
36
DuanM.HunterS. S.MinnichS. A.FagnanM. W.NewD. D.HovdeC. J.et al (2018). Complete genome sequence of broadhost- range Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophage SH2026Stx1, isolated from Escherichia coli O157:H7.Genome Announc.6:e490-18. 10.1128/genomeA.00490-18
37
EthelbergS.OlsenK. E. P.ScheutzF.JensenC.SchiellerupP.EngbergJ.et al (2004). virulence factors for hemolytic uremic syndrome, Denmark.Emerg. Infect. Dis.10:842. 10.3201/eid1005.030576
38
FoggP. C. M.GossageS. M.SmithD. L.SaundersJ. R.McCarthyA. J.AllisonH. E. (2007). Identification of multiple integration sites for Stx-phage Φ24B in the Escherichia coli genome, description of a novel integrase and evidence for a functional anti-repressor.Microbiology1534098–4110. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011205-0
39
FordeB. M.McAllisterL. J.PatonJ. C.PatonA. W.BeatsonS. A. (2019). SMRT sequencing reveals differential patterns of methylation in two O111:H- STEC isolates from a hemolytic uremic syndrome outbreak in Australia.Sci. Rep.9:9436. 10.1038/s41598-019-45760-5
40
FrankC.WerberD.CramerJ. P.AskarM.FaberM.An Der HeidenM.et al (2011). Epidemic profile of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak in Germany.N. Engl. J. Med.3651771–1780. 10.1056/NEJMoa1106483
41
FriedrichA. W.BielaszewskaM.ZhangW.PulzM.KucziusT.AmmonA.et al (2002). Escherichia coli harboring shiga toxin 2 gene variants: frequency and association with clinical symptoms.J. Infect. Dis.18574–84. 10.1086/338115
42
GarneauJ. R.DepardieuF.FortierL. C.BikardD.MonotM. (2017). PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data.Sci. Rep.7:8292. 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5
43
GrandeL.MichelacciV.TozzoliR.RanieriP.MauglianiA.CaprioliA.et al (2014). Whole genome sequence comparison of vtx2-converting phages from enteroaggregative haemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains.BMC Genomics14:610. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-574
44
GrothA. C.CalosM. P. (2004). Phage integrases: biology and applications.J. Mol. Biol.335667–678. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.082
45
HeimanK. E.ModyR. K.JohnsonS. D.GriffinP. M.Hannah GouldL. (2015). Escherichia coli O157 outbreaks in the United States, 2003–2012.Emerg. Infect. Dis.21:1293. 10.3201/eid2108.141364
46
JenkinsC.DallmanT. J.LaundersN.WillisC.ByrneL.JorgensenF.et al (2015). Public health investigation of two outbreaks of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 associated with consumption of watercress.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.813946–3952. 10.1128/AEM.04188-14
47
JoensenK. G.ScheutzF.LundO.HasmanH.KaasR. S.NielsenE. M.et al (2014). Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli.J. Clin. Microbiol.521501–1510. 10.1128/JCM.03617-13
48
KieftK.ZhouZ.AnantharamanK. (2020). VIBRANT: automated recovery, annotation and curation of microbial viruses, and evaluation of viral community function from genomic sequences.Microbiome.8:90. 10.1186/s40168-020-00867-0
49
KrügerA.BurgánJ.FriedrichA. W.RossenJ. W. A.LucchesiP. M. A. (2018). ArgO145, a Stx2a prophage of a bovine O145: H-STEC strain, is closely related to phages of virulent human strains.Infect. Genet. Evol.60126–132. 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.02.024
50
KrügerA.LucchesiP. M. A. (2015). Shiga toxins and stx phages: highly diverse entities.Microbiol.161(Pt 3), 451–462. 10.1099/mic.0.000003
51
KumarS.StecherG.LiM.KnyazC.TamuraK. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms.Mol. Biol. Evol.351547–1549. 10.1093/molbev/msy096
52
LefkowitzE. J.DempseyD. M.HendricksonR. C.OrtonR. J.SiddellS. G.SmithD. B. (2018). Virus taxonomy: the database of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses (ICTV).Nucleic Acids Res.46D708–D717. 10.1093/nar/gkx932
53
LeJeuneJ. T.AbedonS. T.TakemuraK.ChristieN. P.SreevatsanS. (2004). Human Escherichia coli O157:H7 genetic marker in isolates of bovine origin.Emerg. Infect. Dis.10:1482. 10.3201/eid1008.030784
54
LetunicI.BorkP. (2019). Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments.Nucleic Acids Res.47W256–W259. 10.1093/nar/gkz239
55
LoweT. M.ChanP. P. (2016). tRNAscan-SE on-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes.Nucleic Acids Res.44W54–W57. 10.1093/nar/gkw413
56
Melton-CelsaA. R. (2014). Shiga toxin (Stx) classification, structure, and function.Microbiol. Spectr.2EHEC–0024–2013. 10.1128/microbiolspec.ehec-0024-2013
57
MoakM.MolineuxI. J. (2004). Peptidoglycan hydrolytic activities associated with bacteriophage virions.Mol. Microbiol.511169–1183. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03894.x
58
MorgadoS.VicenteA. C. (2019). Global in-silico scenario of tRNA genes and their organization in virus genomes.Viruses11:180. 10.3390/v11020180
59
MuniesaM.BlancoJ. E.De SimónM.Serra-MorenoR.BlanchA. R.et al (2004). Diversity of stx2 converting bacteriophages induced from Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from cattle.Microbiology1502959–2971. 10.1099/mic.0.27188-0
60
NüblingS.EiseleT.StöberH.FunkJ.PolzinS.FischerL.et al (2014). Bacteriophage 933W encodes a functional esterase downstream of the Shiga toxin 2a operon.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.304269–274. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.10.008
61
NurkS.BankevichA.AntipovD.GurevichA. A.KorobeynikovA.LapidusA.et al (2013). Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products.J. Comput. Biol.20714–737. 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084
62
PengQ.YuanY. (2018). Characterization of a newly isolated phage infecting pathogenic Escherichia coli and analysis of its mosaic structural genes.Sci. Rep.8:8086. 10.1038/s41598-018-26004-4
63
PerssonS.OlsenK. E. P.EthelbergS.ScheutzF. (2007). Subtyping method for Escherichia coli Shiga toxin (Verocytotoxin) 2 variants and correlations to clinical manifestations.J. Clin. Microbiol.452020–2024. 10.1128/JCM.02591-06
64
PlunkettG.RoseD. J.DurfeeT. J.BlattnerF. R. (1999). Sequence of Shiga toxin 2 phage 933W from Escherichia coli O157:H7: Shiga toxin as a phage late-gene product.J. Bacteriol.1811767–1778. 10.1128/JB.181.6.1767-1778.1999
65
PreveligeP. E.CortinesJ. R. (2018). Phage assembly and the special role of the portal protein.Curr. Opin. Virol.3166–73. 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.09.004
66
QuirósP.MuniesaM. (2017). Contribution of cropland to the spread of Shiga toxin phages and the emergence of new Shiga toxin-producing strains.Sci. Rep.7:7796. 10.1038/s41598-017-08169-6
67
RobertsJ. W.YarnellW.BartlettE.GuoJ.MarrM.KoD. C.et al (1998). Antitermination by bacteriophage λ Q protein.Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.63319–325. 10.1101/sqb.1998.63.319
68
Rodríguez-RubioL.GutiérrezD.DonovanD. M.MartínezB.RodríguezA.GarcíaP. (2016). Phage lytic proteins: biotechnological applications beyond clinical antimicrobials.Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.36542–552. 10.3109/07388551.2014.993587
69
Rodríguez-RubioL.MartínezB.DonovanD. M.RodríguezA.GarcíaP. (2013). Bacteriophage virion-associated peptidoglycan hydrolases: potential new enzybiotics.Crit. Rev. Microbiol.39427–434. 10.3109/1040841X.2012.723675
70
RoessnerC. A.IhlerG. M. (1984). Proteinase sensitivity of bacteriophage lambda tail proteins gpJ and pH in complexes with the lambda receptor.J. Bacteriol.57165–170. 10.1128/jb.157.1.165-170.1984
71
SchmidtH. (2001). Shiga-toxin-converting bacteriophages.Res. Microbiol.152687–695. 10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01249-9
72
SeemannT. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.Bioinformatics302068–2069. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153
73
Serra-MorenoR.JofreJ.MuniesaM. (2007). Insertion site occupancy by stx2 bacteriophages depends on the locus availability of the host strain chromosome.J. Bacteriol.1896645–6654. 10.1128/JB.00466-07
74
SharmaV. K.AkavaramS.SchautR. G.BaylesD. O. (2019). Comparative genomics reveals structural and functional features specific to the genome of a foodborne Escherichia coli O157:H7.BMC Genomics20:196. 10.1186/s12864-019-5568-6
75
SmithD. L.JamesC. E.SergeantM. J.YaxianY.SaundersJ. R.McCarthyA. J.et al (2007a). Short-tailed Stx phages exploit the conserved YaeT protein to disseminate Shiga toxin genes among enterobacteria.J. Bacteriol.1897223–7233. 10.1128/JB.00824-07
76
SmithD. L.WareingB. M.FoggP. C. M.RileyL. M.SpencerM.CoxM. J.et al (2007b). Multilocus characterization scheme for shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophages.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.738032–8040. 10.1128/AEM.01278-07
77
SmithD. L.RooksD. J.FoggP. C. M.DarbyA. C.ThomsonN. R.McCarthyA. J.et al (2012). Comparative genomics of Shiga toxin encoding bacteriophages.BMC Genomics13:311. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-311
78
SongW.SunH.-X.ZhangC.ChengL.PengY.DengZ.et al (2019). Prophage Hunter: an integrative hunting tool for active prophages.Nucleic Acids Res.47W74–W80. 10.1093/nar/gkz380
79
SteyertS. R.SahlJ. W.FraserC. M.TeelL. D.ScheutzF.RaskoD. A. (2012). Comparative genomics and stx phage characterization of LEE-negative Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.2:133. 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00133
80
SullivanM. J.PettyN. K.BeatsonS. A. (2011). Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer.Bioinformatics271009–1010. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039
81
TóthI.SvábD.BálintB.Brown-JaqueM.MarótiG. (2016). Comparative analysis of the Shiga toxin converting bacteriophage first detected in Shigella sonnei.Infect. Genet. Evol.37150–157. 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.11.022
82
TylerJ. S.MillsM. J.FriedmanD. I. (2004). The operator and early promoter region of the Shiga toxin type 2-encoding bacteriophage 933W and control of toxin expression.J. Bacteriol.1867670–7679. 10.1128/JB.186.22.7670-7679.2004
83
USDA (2020). Lakeside Refrigerated Services Recalls Beef Products due to Possible E.coli O157:H7 Contamination.Washington, DC: USDA.
84
ValilisE.RamseyA.SidiqS.DuPontH. L. (2018). Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli—a poorly appreciated enteric pathogen: systematic review.Int. J. Infect. Dis.7682–87. 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.09.002
85
WhiteA.CronquistA.BedrickE. J.ScallanE. (2016). Food source prediction of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli outbreaks using demographic and outbreak characteristics, United States, 1998-2014.Foodborne Pathog. Dis.13527–534. 10.1089/fpd.2016.2140
86
XuS. Y. (2015). Sequence-specific DNA nicking endonucleases.Biomol. Concepts6253–267. 10.1515/bmc-2015-0016
87
YangX.BaiX.ZhangJ.SunH.FuS.FanR.et al (2020). Escherichia coli strains producing a novel Shiga toxin 2 subtype circulate in China.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.310:151377. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2019.151377
88
YehlK.LemireS.YangA. C.AndoH.MimeeM.TorresM. D. T.et al (2019). Engineering phage host-range and suppressing bacterial resistance through phage tail fiber mutagenesis.Cell179459.e9–469.e9. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.015
89
YinS.RusconiB.SanjarF.GoswamiK.XiaoliL.EppingerM.et al (2015). Escherichia coli O157: H7 strains harbor at least three distinct sequence types of Shiga toxin 2a-converting phages.BMC Genomics16:733. 10.1186/s12864-015-1934-1
90
YosefI.GorenM. G.GlobusR.Molshanski-MorS.QimronU. (2017). Extending the host range of bacteriophage particles for DNA transduction.Mol. Cell.66721.e3–728.e3. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.025
91
YoungR. (2014). Phage lysis: three steps, three choices, one outcome.J. Microbiol.56430–481. 10.1007/s12275-014-4087-z
92
ZankariE.HasmanH.CosentinoS.VestergaardM.RasmussenS.LundO.et al (2012). Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.672640–2644. 10.1093/jac/dks261
93
ZhangX.McDanielA. D.WolfL. E.KeuschG. T.WaldorM. K.AchesonD. W. K. (2000). Quinolone antibiotics induce shiga toxin–encoding bacteriophages, toxin production, and death in mice.J. Infect. Dis.181664–670. 10.1086/315239
94
ZhangY.LiaoY.-T.SalvadorA.SunX.WuV. C. H. (2019). Complete genome sequence of a shiga toxin-converting bacteriophage, Escherichia phage Lys12581Vzw, induced from an outbreak shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strain.Microbiol. Resour. Announc.8:e793-19. 10.1128/MRA.00793-19
95
ZhangY.LiaoY.-T.SalvadorA.SunX.WuV. C. H. (2020). Prediction, diversity, and genomic analysis of temperate phages induced from shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains.Front. Microbiol.10:3093. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03093
Summary
Keywords
Stx-converting bacteriophages, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, comparative genomics, genetic diversity, virulence gene transfer
Citation
Zhang Y, Liao Y-T, Salvador A and Wu VCH (2021) Genomic Characterization of Two Shiga Toxin–Converting Bacteriophages Induced From Environmental Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 12:587696. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.587696
Received
27 July 2020
Accepted
13 January 2021
Published
25 February 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Maite Muniesa, University of Barcelona, Spain
Reviewed by
Alejandra Krüger, National University of Central Buenos Aires, Argentina; Heather Elizabeth Allison, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Zhang, Liao, Salvador and Wu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Vivian C. H. Wu, vivian.wu@usda.gov
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Virology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.