Abstract
Deinococcus radiodurans known for its extraordinary resistance to ionizing radiation contains bacterial phytochrome (BphP), a member of the family of red/far-red light-sensing proteins. In this study, we constructed a bphP mutant strain (ΔbphP) to investigate the role of D. radiodurans BphP (DrBphP) in the DNA damage response. When cells were incubated under light and dark conditions following exposure to DNA damaging agents, such as γ- and UV-radiation and mitomycin C (MMC), no significant difference in cell survival was observed between the wild-type D. radiodurans strain (WT) and ΔbphP. However, when continuously exposed to MMC under light conditions, the WT strain notably exhibited increased survival compared to cells grown in the dark. The increased survival was not observed in the ΔbphP strain. These results are indicative of the protective role of light-activated DrBphP in the presence of MMC. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the conserved amino acids Cys-24 and His-532 involved in chromophore binding and signal transduction, respectively, were essential for the protective function of DrBphP. Inactivation of the cognate response regulator (RR; DrBphR) of DrBphP increased MMC resistance in the dark. In trans complementation of the bphP bphR double mutant strain (ΔbphPR) with DrBphR decreased MMC resistance. Considering that DrBphP acts as a light-activated phosphatase that dephosphorylates DrBphR, it appears that phosphorylated DrBphR exerts a negative effect on cell survival in the presence of MMC. DrBphP overexpression resulted in an increase in MMC resistance of ΔbphPR, implying that other RRs might be involved in the DrBphP-mediated signaling pathway. A mutant lacking the dr_0781 gene (Δdr_0781) demonstrated the same MMC phenotype as ΔbphR. Survival was further increased in the bphR dr_0781 double mutant strain compared to each single mutant ΔbphR or Δdr_0781, suggesting that DR_0781 is also involved in the DrBphP-dependent MMC sensitivity. This study uncovered a previously unknown phenomenon of red/far-red light-dependent DNA damage survival mediated by BphP by identifying the conditions under which DrBphP exhibits a fitness advantage.
Introduction
Deinococcus radiodurans, a small, red-pigmented, tetrad-forming Gram-positive bacterium, is noted for its extreme resistance to a variety of DNA-damaging agents, including γ-radiation, UV radiation, desiccation, mitomycin C (MMC), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; ). The extreme resistance of D. radiodurans has been attributed to its highly efficient DNA repair systems (). Deinococcus radiodurans possesses an extended synthesis-dependent strand annealing (ESDSA) system, in which RecFOR proteins play essential roles in DNA double-strand break repair (). Plentiful antioxidant systems, including common reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging enzymes (e.g., catalase and superoxide dismutase) and a variety of non-enzymatic antioxidants (e.g., carotenoids and manganese species), also contribute to the protection of D. radiodurans from DNA-damaging agents (). Since the genome of D. radiodurans was sequenced in 1999 (), proteins involved in both the DNA repair and antioxidant systems have been investigated (; ; ).
Phytochromes are red/far-red reversible photoreceptors that regulate a wide array of light-dependent processes in plants and microorganisms (). Plant phytochromes act as light-regulated master switches in various photomorphogenic processes, such as seed germination, de-etiolation, stem growth, pigmentation, and flowering (). The bacterial phytochrome, BphP, from D. radiodurans was the first BphP to be discovered in non-photosynthetic bacteria and was evaluated and described in detail in 1999 (). Classical phytochromes are homodimeric complexes with each subunit containing an N-terminal photosensory module (PSM) that covalently binds a bilin chromophore and a C-terminal module, often a histidine kinase (HK), responding to the light signal (; ). The most common PSM architecture involves three domains, Period/Arnt/Single-Minded (PAS), cGMP phosphodiesterase/adenylyl cyclase/FhlA (GAF), and phytochrome region (PHY; ; ). Deinococcus radiodurans BphP (DrBphP) contains the PSM (PAS-GAF-PHY) linked to the C-terminal HK module (Figure 1A; ).
Figure 1
Phytochromes exist in two states that absorb red light (Pr state) and far-red light (Pfr state; ). DrBphP undergoes rapid inter-conversion between the Pr and Pfr states upon absorption of the appropriate wavelength as follows: Pr is converted to Pfr following red light (700 nm) exposure, and Pfr is converted to Pr by far-red light (760 nm; Figure 1B; ). Based on the observation that red light increased pigmentation in D. radiodurans, but far-red light did not, it was suggested that DrBphP is more active in its Pfr form (; ). Also, it has been reported that DrBphP helps to protect the bacterium from visible light: colony growth of DrBphP-deficient strain was reduced compared to wild type when grown under intense light conditions (). Many BphPs containing HK domains function as typical sensor kinases of two-component signaling systems (TCSs). Following autophosphorylation, a HK transfers the phosphoryl group to a response regulator (RR), which then regulates gene expression or other processes, thus facilitating adaption to environmental changes (). In D. radiodurans, the bphP gene immediately precedes the bphR gene, which encodes a putative cognate RR of DrBphP, named DrBphR (Figure 1A). However, a recent study showed that DrBphP lacks autokinase or phosphotransfer activities in both the Pr and Pfr states; thus it does not produce phosphorylated DrBphR (phospho-DrBphR; ). Instead, DrBphP functions exclusively as a light-activated phosphatase. DrBphP can dephosphorylate phospho-DrBphR, which is phosphorylated using a non-enzymatic mechanism or by other HKs ().
Despite intensive physicochemical and biochemical analysis of DrBphP, the DrBphP functional roles in DNA damage resistance have not been investigated. In this study, we constructed a bphP mutant strain to investigate whether DrBphP contributes to the D. radiodurans resistance to DNA-damaging agents. Our results revealed that light-activated DrBphP contributes to bacterial resistance to genotoxic stress caused by MMC, an alkylating agent that induces DNA inter-strand cross-links (ICLs) inhibiting DNA synthesis.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
Deinococcus radiodurans R1 (ATCC 13939) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Deinococcus wulumuqiensis (KACC 16755; DSM 28115), Deinococcus maricopensis (KACC 11804; DSM 21211), and Deinococcus proteolyticus (KACC 12249; ATCC 35074) were obtained from the Korea Agricultural Culture Collection (KACC). Deinococcus cells were grown at 30°C in TGY (0.5% tryptone, 0.3% yeast extract, and 0.1% glucose) broth or on TGY plates supplemented with 1.5% Bacto-agar. Escherichia coli DH5α was used for routine cloning experiments. Escherichia coli strains were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium or on LB plates solidified with agar. Transformed E. coli cells were selected using ampicillin (100 μg/ml) or kanamycin (50 μg/ml), as necessary.
Construction of Mutant Strains
A mutant strain lacking bphP was constructed using fusion PCR, as previously described (). The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Each up and downstream region of bphP was amplified using the upstream (bphP-Up) and downstream (bphP-Dn) primer pairs, respectively. These two PCR fragments were mixed and amplified by PCR using their outer primers, i.e., the bphP-Up forward and bphP-Dn reverse primers, to produce a single amplicon. The fusion PCR product was then cloned into a pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, United States), digested with NruI, and ligated to a 975 bp HincII fragment (kan cassette) from pKatAPH3 (). The mutant strains lacking bphP were constructed by transforming wild-type D. radiodurans strain with the PCR products amplified from the recombinant plasmid. A bphR mutant strain was constructed as described above using the bphR-Up and bphR-Dn primer sets. To construct a bphPR double mutant strain, the DNA fragment containing bphP and bphR was amplified using bphPR forward and reverse primers and then cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector. Because the bphR and bphP genes have internal SmaI and StuI sites, respectively, the recombinant pGEM-T plasmid was ligated to the kan cassette from pKatAPH3 following enzyme digestion. Other D. radiodurans RR mutant strains were constructed using the deletion mutagenesis technique, as previously described (). Briefly, the up and downstream regions (approximately 1 kb) of each of the target genes were amplified using the appropriate primer pairs (Supplementary Table S1). The amplified PCR fragments were digested with XhoI (or KpnI)/EcoRV to produce the upstream fragments and XbaI/PstI to produce the downstream fragments, respectively, and then cloned into the corresponding sites of pKatAPH3. The final selection of the transformed D. radiodurans cells was completed using kanamycin (8 μg/ml) supplementation. For the construction of dr_0781 bphR and dr_0781 bphR, double mutant strains pKatCAT5 with a chloramphenicol-resistance gene cassette was used (). The up and downstream regions of dr_0781 were amplified using the primer pairs dr0781-Up-Cam and dr0781-Dn-Cam, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). The PCR-amplified up and downstream regions were digested with XhoI/EcoRV and BamHI/PstI, respectively, and then cloned into the corresponding sites of pKatCAT5. The resulting plasmid was transformed into the bphR or bphP mutant strain, and the cells were incubated on TGY plates supplemented with chloramphenicol (3.8 μg/ml). Gene replacement was confirmed by PCR and nucleotide sequencing.
Plasmid Construction
The bphP and bphR gene expression plasmids pBP and pBR were constructed as previously described (). The pRADgro plasmid, which contains the groESL promoter for constitutive gene expression, was used as a backbone plasmid (). The forward and reverse primers for bphP and bphR amplification were designed to include ApaI and HindIII sites, respectively, to facilitate the ligation of the PCR products (Supplementary Table S1). Single amino acid substitutions were introduced into DrBphP using complementary primer pairs, BphP-C24A and BphP-H532A, which contain the C24A and H53A mutations, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out under the following conditions: 50 ng of pBphP plasmid, 1 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1 U of nPfu-Forte polymerase, and 10× nPfu-Forte buffer (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Korea) were mixed in a final volume of 50 μl and then amplified using the following cycling parameters: cycling protocols were 2 min at 95°C followed by 18 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, 7 min at 68°C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The amplified plasmids, which were designated as pBPC and pBPH, respectively, were digested with DpnI and transformed into E. coli DH5α. Nucleotide sequences of the target genes inserted into pRADgro were verified by sequencing. The transformed D. radiodurans cells were selected using chloramphenicol (3.4 μg/ml) supplementation.
Acute Exposure Assays
Deinococcus radiodurans cultures grown to log phase (OD600 ≈ 1.0) were adjusted to ~107 CFU/ml in TGY medium and exposed to different DNA-damaging agents. Cells were treated as described below, serially diluted 10-fold in 0.85% NaCl, and spotted on TGY plates. The plates were then incubated in the dark or under red light (700 nm) and far-red light (760 nm) for 2 days (LED light incubator DS210-SF, Daewon Science, Korea). Dimensions of an experimental chamber were 500 mm wide × 500 mm high × 500 mm deep, with a surface area of 0.250 m2. The chamber contained 16 LED strips, eight for each light, 700 nm and 760 nm, in its ceiling, and samples were placed at a distance of 10 mm from the ceiling. Each LED strip was manufactured with 36 LEDs (5,050 SMD LED, 0.3 lumen). Resistance to MMC or H2O2 was determined by adding different concentrations of MMC or H2O2 to D. radiodurans cultures grown in TGY. The cultures were incubated for 1 h in the presence of MMC or H2O2 with shaking at 30°C and then evaluated for viability. The γ-radiation treatment was completed by irradiating the bacterial cells at room temperature using a 60Co-gamma irradiator (AECL, IR-79; MDS Nordion International Co. Ltd., Ottawa, Canada) at the Advanced Radiation Technology Institute in the Republic of Korea. The dose rate was 6 kGy/h. UV-stress survival was evaluated by exposing plates, on which cells were spotted, to UVC light in a UVC ultraviolet crosslinker (CX-2000, UVP LLC, Upland, CA, United States) at 20 J/m2/s for different time intervals.
Chronic Exposure Assays
The cells were grown to log phase (OD600 ≈ 1.0), adjusted to ~107 CFU/ml, and then serially diluted 10-fold in fresh TGY medium from 107 to 102 CFU/ml. Then, 10-μl (105–100 CFU) of each dilution was spotted on TGY plates supplemented with various concentrations of MMC, H2O2, methyl methanesulfonate, or toluidine blue, and then incubated for 2 days under different light conditions as described in the “Acute Exposure Assays” section.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
A 5 ml culture was grown to the early log phase (OD600 ≈ 1.0) under red light and dark conditions and then used in RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis as previously described (). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on a CFX Connect real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). PCR reactions were performed as follows: one cycle of 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s. The housekeeping gene, dr1343, encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, was used as an internal control. The primers used in these assays are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.
Results
bphP Mutation Abolishes Light-Dependent MMC Resistance in D. radiodurans
To investigate whether DrBphP contributes to cell survival, first, we treated D. radiodurans wild-type (WT) and bphP mutant (ΔbphP) strains with DNA-damaging agents and then incubated the strains under red light (700 nm) and no light (dark) conditions. A 12 kGy dose of γ-radiation resulted in an approximately 1-log reduction in ∆bphP survival relative to WT, but this reduction was observed under both light and dark conditions (Supplementary Figure S1). When treated with MMC and UV-C radiation, the survival of WT and ΔbphP was dose-dependently reduced, but there was no difference in survival between the two strains (Supplementary Figure S2). Next, we evaluated their abilities to withstand DNA-damaging agents in the light. To this end, cells were dotted onto plates supplemented with MMC and incubated under red or far-red light (760 nm) and in the dark. Compared to the acute exposure method, D. radiodurans cells were shown to be highly sensitive to MMC in this chronic assay. WT survival was reduced by approximately 3 log units in the dark when cells were exposed to 300 nM (≈ 100 ng/ml) of MMC (Figure 2A), which was equivalent to the survival rate of WT treated with 30 μM of MMC for 1 h in the acute assay (Supplementary Figure S2). The increased sensitivity is likely attributable to the continuous challenge with MMC over a 2-day incubation period, thus, even relatively low levels of MMC can exert significant detrimental effects on cellular survival.
Figure 2
The WT strain grown in the dark showed a significant reduction in survival at 300 nM MMC when compared to WT grown under light conditions (Figure 2A), while there was no difference in the survival of ΔbphP grown under all conditions tested (Figure 2B). Interestingly, the survivability of ∆bphP was similar to that of WT grown in the dark. When exposed to H2O2 or methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), another DNA alkylating agent, in the same way described above ΔbphP exhibited the same degree of resistance to these agents as the WT (Supplementary Figure S3). We constructed an expression plasmid producing DrBphP and used this construct to complement the ΔbphP strain. Complementation by plasmid-borne bphP in trans fully restored the growth-defective phenotype of ΔbphP (Figure 3). This clearly demonstrates that the decreased MMC resistance in ΔbphP can be attributed to the lack of DrBphP. Taken together, our results show that DrBphP is specifically required for resistance to continuous MMC exposure and that photoactivation of DrBphP by illumination is a prerequisite for its protective function.
Figure 3
Cys-24 and His-532 Are Critical to DrBphP Function
Deinococcus radiodurans BphPs use BV as a chromophore, which is synthesized by the oxidative degradation of heme by heme oxygenase (HO; ). Deinococcus radiodurans possesses a bphO gene encoding its own HO, which is located upstream of bphP (Figure 1A). DrBphP binds BV via a conserved cysteine (Cys-24) upstream of the PAS domain (). The DrBphP histidine residue, His-532, is one of the three central DrBphP residues that interact with DrBphR (). We constructed DrBphP derivatives using alanine substitution at amino acids Cys-24 and His-532. When the engineered proteins harboring C24A and H532A were provided in trans, both C24A and H532A mutants failed to restore the survival of ΔbphP to the WT levels under light conditions (Figure 3). These results suggest that the BV-binding Cys24 and DrBphR interacting His532 are crucial for the protective role of DrBphP against MMC in light.
Deinoxanthin-Deficient Strain Is Not Sensitive to Continuous MMC Exposure
Mitomycin C is a quinone-containing alkylating agent, and bio-reductive activation of MMC is responsible for its cytotoxic properties. Enzymatic reduction of the quinone moiety in MMC results in the production of various ROS, including superoxide anion and H2O2 (). It has been reported that DrBphP is involved in the biosynthesis of a unique carotenoid, deinoxanthin (). Because deinoxanthin has ROS-scavenging activity (), we investigated the resistance of the crtI mutant strain (∆crtI), which lacks the phytoene desaturase necessary for deinoxanthin production (), to determine whether a defect in deinoxanthin could introduce the same phenotype as ∆bphP. There was no significant difference in MMC resistance between WT and ∆crtI, suggesting that a change in deinoxanthin availability cannot explain the decreased MMC resistance of ∆bphP (Figure 4A). Red light induces photodynamic stress by increasing the levels of ROS in the presence of oxygen and photosensitizers (). Thus, we examined the growth of WT and ∆bphP using toluidine blue (TB) as a photosensitizer. Although the survival fractions were reduced in the presence of TB when cells were grown under red light conditions, the difference between the WT and ∆bphP strains was marginal (Figure 4B), which was consistent with the results of the H2O2 survival test (Supplementary Figure S3). Taken together, these results imply that ROS neutralization is not directly associated with the MMC-specific protective function of DrBphP.
Figure 4
bphR Mutation Increases MMC Resistance in D. radiodurans
Deinococcus radiodurans BphP dephosphorylates its cognate response regulator (RR), DrBphR (). To identify the role of DrBphR in MMC resistance, we constructed a mutant bphR (∆bphR) strain and subjected this to the same survival assays as described above. The viability of ∆bphR was similar to that of WT under red and far-red light conditions (Figure 5A). Notably, the surviving fraction of ∆bphR did not decrease in the dark, which resulted in a clear difference between the ∆bphR and WT strains (Figure 5A). The enhanced MMC-resistance phenotype of ∆bphR was partially complemented by the expression of a plasmid-encoded bphR gene, especially in the dark (Figure 5A). The bphP bphR double mutant strain (∆bphPR) was shown to be sensitive to continuous exposure of MMC, similar to the ∆bphP strain (Figure 5B). Interestingly, trans-complementation of the bphP gene fully restored the MMC resistance of ΔbphPR to the wild-type level, while the expression of bphR decreased the MMC resistance of ΔbphPR (Figure 5B). Considering the opposite effects of the bphP and bphR mutations, we conclude that DrBphP counteracts the effects of DrBphR in the light, presumably via de-phosphorylation.
Figure 5
DR_0781 Is an Additional RR Affecting MMC Sensitivity
Photoactivated DrBphP increases MMC resistance in cells lacking DrBphR (Figure 5B), suggesting that there might be other RRs involved in DrBphP-mediated regulation. We found 26 putative RRs in D. radiodurans, which possess a RR receiver domain, in the Microbial Signal Transduction database (): DR_0408, DR_0432, DR_0731, DR_0743, DR_0781, DR_0891, DR_0987, DR_1175, DR_1418, DR_1558, DR_1605, DR_2245, DR_2556, DR_2327, DR_2415, DR_2418, DR_2420, DR_A0010, DR_A0350, DR_A0357, DR_A0139, DR_A0204, DR_B0028, DR_B0029, DR_B0081, and DR_B0091. We were able to inactivate 11 of these genes, and 12 mutant strains, including the previously constructed drtR (dr_2415) mutant strain (), were evaluated using an MMC survival assay (Supplementary Figure S4). There were no strains whose survival fraction decreased as much as ΔbphP under red light conditions, but Δdr_0781 survival was not reduced in the dark like ΔbphR (Supplementary Figure S4). We constructed a dr_0781 bphR double mutant strain (Δdr_0781/bphR) and evaluated its ability to withstand MMC. Δdr_0781/bphR exhibited an enhanced MMC resistance under all conditions tested compared to each single mutant Δdr_0781 or ΔbphR (Figure 6A), suggesting that DR_0781 and DrBphR attenuate MMC resistance via independent pathways.
Figure 6
In D. radiodurans, repair of MMC-induced ICLs involves multiple DNA repair pathways such as nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination, in which UvrABC, UvsE, and RecA act cooperatively (). Deinococcus-specific regulatory protein PprI, also called IrrE, is required for the induced expression of uvrA and recA (). We compared expression of the pprI, recA, uvrA1, and uvsE genes between WT and mutants. Neither gene mutations nor light illumination affected the pprI expression significantly (Figure 6B). Interestingly, recA expression was induced by light illumination in WT and Δdr_0781, but not in ΔbphR (Figure 6B). Light also enhanced uvrA1 expression in WT, but not in ΔbphR and Δdr_0781, and uvrA1 and uvsE were downregulated in ΔbphR (Figure 6B). When the bphR mutation was complemented in trans, the gene expression pattern was restored to that of WT (Supplementary Figure S5). The different gene expression profiles of ΔbphR and Δdr_0781 are consistent with our conclusions that DrBphR and DR_0781 function independent of each other.
The Protective Role of BphP Is Observed in Other Deinococcus Species
In D. radiodurans, bphO, bphP, and bphR constitute the bph operon (Figure 1A). We analyzed the distribution of BphP in 27 Deinococcus genomes and found 13 BphP homologs in 12 Deinococcus species (Figure 7A). The sequence identity between DrBphP and the other BphPs ranged from 35% (BphP of Deinococcus sp. UR1) to 64% (BphP of Deinococcus sp. YIM77859; Figure 7A). The same genetic structure (bphO-bphP-bphR) was observed in nine of the 13 bph operons reported here (Figure 7B). Deinococcus wulumuqiensis, which is the closest relative of D. radiodurans (), does not encode any bph genes (Figure 7A). To test if the light-dependent increase in survival under chronic MMC exposure is conserved among the Deinococcus species, we tested representative species that contain bphP, D. maricopensis, or lack bphP, D. wulumuqiensis, and D. proteolyticus (Figure 7). Deinococcus maricopensis showed a more than 1-log increase in survival in the light, compared to the dark (Figure 8), similar to D. radiodurans. In contrast, no difference in survival was observed for D. wulumuqiensis and D. proteolyticus (Figure 8). These results show that the protective function of BphP upon chronic exposure to MMC in the light is conserved among the Deinococcus species.
Figure 7
Figure 8
Discussion
In this study, we found that DrBphP playa protective role against chronic MMC exposure in the presence of light (Figure 2). The light-dependent protective role is conserved among several Deinococcus spp. possessing DrBphP homologs (Figures 7, 8).
The photoconversion of BphPs between Pr and Pfr differentially affects the biological activity of BphPs. DrBphP acts as a phosphatase, with higher activity in the Pfr state than in the Pr state (). In this study, however, DrBphP enhanced MMC resistance in cells grown under both red and far-red light but not affect in those grown in the dark (Figure 2). The contradiction between the enzyme activity in vitro and physiological function in vivo is also observed in PsBphP1, one of the two BphPs encoded in the non-photosynthetic plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. PsBphP1 exhibits approximately 20-fold more efficient autophosphorylation in the Pfr form (). However, PsBphP1 suppresses the swarming motility of P. syringae under both red and far-red light conditions and does not exert its effect in the dark (). The conversion of Pfr to the Pr state can occur either by light absorption or by a light-independent thermal relaxation process, referred to as thermal or dark reversion. Although thermal reversion has been demonstrated in vitro for several phytochromes from different microbial species, its impacts on phytochrome signaling and physiological responses in these organisms remains unknown () and warrants further investigation.
Bacterial phytochromes act via various downstream partners. The purple nonsulfur bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris encodes six BphPs (RpBphP1–RpBphP6) of which only RpBphP2 and RpBphP3 display the typical BphP architecture (). RpBphP2 and RpBphP3 and three RRs encoded in the same operon sense light quality and upregulate the synthesis of the photosynthetic apparatus, light-harvesting complex 4 (). In this study, two RRs, DrBphR and DR_0781, were found to be associated with DrBphP-dependent MMC resistance (Figures 5, 6). DrBphR had a negative effect on survival in the light during chronic MMC exposure (Figure 5). Since DrBphR is a substrate for the phosphatase DrBphP (), it is likely that the light-activated DrBphP dephosphorylates DrBphR; this counteracts the negative effect of DrBphR, thereby protecting cells against MMC. In a typical TCS, the genes encoding HK and its cognate RR are organized in pairs. However, there also exist unpaired HKs and orphan RRs, i.e., an RR gene is not adjacent to a gene encoding HK, and vice versa. Despite obvious linearity in TCSs, functional coupling can occur between an orphan RR and a noncognate HK protein (; ). Considering that DR_0781 is an orphan and also has a negative effect on cell survival similar to DrBphR (Figure 6), it is possible that DR_0781 is another substrate for DrBphP. It is worth investigating whether DR_0781 is dephosphorylated by DrBphP in vitro.
DrBphR is a single-domain RR comprising a receiver domain with no obvious regulatory domain, whereas DR_0781 is a two-domain RR containing a DNA-binding output domain (; ). Therefore, although how these RRs attenuate cell survival remains unclear, it can be inferred that the mechanisms underlying the negative effects of DrBphR and DR_0781 on survival are different. Notably, the genes encoding DNA repair proteins RecA, UvrA1, and UvsE were downregulated in ΔbphR and not in Δdr_0781, and recA expression was enhanced by red light illumination in Δdr_0781 (Figure 6B). However, both ΔbphR and Δdr_0781 exhibited increased survival compared with WT, and a further increase in survival was observed in the dr_0781 bphR double mutant strain compared with ΔbphR or Δdr_0781 (Figure 6A). These results suggest that DrBphR and DR_0781 work independently of each other and affect different target genes or proteins, including DNA repair proteins, in response to light. Our future work will focus on identifying and investigating the roles of DNA repair proteins participating in the DrBphP-mediated increase in MMC resistance and their regulatory pathways.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
J-HJ performed the experiments and wrote a first draft. SJ validated the experimental results. SI and M-KK constructed the mutants and plasmids. HS guided the experiments and interpreted the results. SL conceived the study, revised the first draft, and was in charge of overall direction and planning. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was supported by the Nuclear R&D program funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MIST), Republic of Korea.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.659233/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AgrawalR.SahooB. K.SainiD. K. (2016). Cross-talk and specificity in two-component signal transduction pathways. Future Microbiol.11, 685–697. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0001
2
AuldridgeM. C.ForestK. T. (2011). Bacterial phytochromes: more than meets the light. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.46, 67–88. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2010.546389
3
BakerA. W.SatyshurK. A.MoralesN. M.ForestK. T. (2016). Arm-in-arm response regulator dimers promote intermolecular signal transduction. J. Bacteriol.198, 1218–1229. doi: 10.1128/JB.00872-15
4
BentchikouE.ServantP.CosteG.SommerS. (2010). A major role of the RecFOR pathway in DNA double-strand-break repair through ESDSA in Deinococcus radiodurans. PLoS Genet.6:e1000774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000774
5
BhooS. H.DavisS. J.WalkerJ.KarniolB.VierstraR. D. (2001). Bacteriophytochromes are photochromic histidine kinases using a biliverdin chromophore. Nature414, 776–779. doi: 10.1038/414776a
6
BurgieE. S.VierstraR. D. (2014). Phytochromes: an atomic perspective on photoactivation and signaling. Plant Cell26, 4568–4583. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.131623
7
CoxM. M.BattistaJ. R. (2005). Deinococcus radiodurans the consummate survivor. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.3, 882–892. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1264
8
DavisS. J.VenerA. V.VierstraR. D. (1999). Bacteriophytochromes: phytochrome-like photoreceptors from nonphotosynthetic eubacteria. Science286, 2517–2520. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2517
9
FixenK. R.OdaY.HarwoodC. S. (2019). Redox regulation of a light-harvesting antenna complex in an anoxygenic phototroph. MBio10, e02838–e02819. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02838-19
10
GalperinM. Y. (2010). Diversity of structure and function of response regulator output domains. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.13, 150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.005
11
GumerovV. M.OrtegaD. R.AdebaliO.UlrichL. E.ZhulinI. B. (2020). MiST 3.0: an updated microbial signal transduction database with an emphasis on chemosensory systems. Nucleic Acids Res.48, D459–D464. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz988
12
HongS.FarranceC. E.RussellA.YiH. (2015). Reclassification of Deinococcus xibeiensis Wang et al. 2010 as a heterotypic synonym of Deinococcus wulumuqiensis Wang, et al. 2010. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.65, 1083–1085. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000058
13
ImS.JoeM.KimD.ParkD.-H.LimS. (2013a). Transcriptome analysis of salt-stressed Deinococcus radiodurans and characterization of salt-sensitive mutants. Res. Microbiol.164, 923–932. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.07.005
14
ImS.SongD.JoeM.KimD.ParkD. H.LimS. (2013b). Comparative survival analysis of 12 histidine kinase mutants of Deinococcus radiodurans after exposure to DNA-damaging agents. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.36, 781–789. doi: 10.1007/s00449-013-0904-8
15
JeongS. W.SeoH. S.KimM. K.ChoiJ. I.LimH. M.LimS. (2016). PprM is necessary for up-regulation of katE1, encoding the major catalase of Deinococcus radiodurans, under unstressed culture conditions. J. Microbiol.54, 426–431. doi: 10.1007/s12275-016-6175-8
16
JoeM. H.LeeK. H.LimS. Y.ImS. H.SongH. P.LeeI. S.et al. (2012). Pigment-based whole-cell biosensor system for cadmium detection using genetically engineered Deinococcus radiodurans. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.35, 265–272. doi: 10.1007/s00449-011-0610-3
17
KloseC.NagyF.SchäferE. (2020). Thermal reversion of plant phytochromes. Mol. Plant13, 386–397. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.12.004
18
LaubM. T.GoulianM. (2007). Specificity in two-component signal transduction pathways. Annu. Rev. Genet.41, 121–145. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.170548
19
LimS.JungJ.-H.BlanchardL.de GrootA. (2019). Conservation and diversity of radiation and oxidative stress resistance mechanisms in Deinococcus species. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.43, 19–52. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy037
20
MakarovaK. S.AravindL.WolfY. I.TatusovR. L.MintonK. W.KooninE. V.et al. (2001). Genome of the extremely radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans viewed from the perspective of comparative genomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.65, 44–79. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.44-79.2001
21
MultamäkiE.NanekarR.MorozovD.LievonenT.GolonkaD.WahlgrenW. Y.et al. (2020). Illuminating a phytochrome paradigm−a light-activated phosphatase in two-component signaling uncovered. bioRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.26.173310
22
QiH. Z.WangW. Z.HeJ. Y.MaY.XiaoF. Z.HeS. Y. (2020). Antioxidative system of Deinococcus radiodurans. Res. Microbiol.171, 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2019.11.002
23
SatohK.TuZ.OhbaH.NarumiI. (2009). Development of versatile shuttle vectors for Deinococcus grandis. Plasmid62, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2009.01.005
24
SladeD.RadmanM. (2011). Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.75, 133–191. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-10
25
SperandioF. F.HuangY.-Y.HamblinM. R. (2013). Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to kill gram-negative bacteria. Recent Pat. Antiinfect. Drug Discov.8, 108–120. doi: 10.2174/1574891x113089990012
26
TakalaH.BjörlingA.LinnaM.WestenhoffS.IhalainenJ. A. (2015). Light-induced changes in the dimerization interface of bacteriophytochromes. J. Biol. Chem.290, 16383–16392. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.650127
27
TianB.WuY.ShengD.ZhengZ.GaoG.HuaY. (2004). Chemiluminescence assay for reactive oxygen species scavenging activities and inhibition on oxidative damage of DNA in Deinococcus radiodurans. Luminescence19, 78–84. doi: 10.1002/bio.761
28
VierstraR. D.ZhangJ. (2011). Phytochrome signaling: solving the Gordian knot with microbial relatives. Trends Plant Sci.16, 417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.05.011
29
WagnerJ. R.BrunzelleJ. S.ForestK. T.VierstraR. D. (2005). A light-sensing knot revealed by the structure of the chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome. Nature438, 325–331. doi: 10.1038/nature04118
30
WangY.GrayJ. P.MishinV.HeckE. E.LaskinD. L.LaskinJ. D. (2010). Distinct roles of cytochrome P450 reductase in mitomycin C redox cycling and cytotoxicity. Mol. Cancer Ther.9, 1852–1863. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-1098
31
WangW.ShuD.ChenL.JiangW.LuY. (2009). Cross-talk between an orphan response regulator and a noncognate histidine kinase in Streptomyces coelicolor. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.294, 150–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01563.x
32
WhiteO.EisenJ. A.HeidelbergJ. F.HickeyE. K.PetersonJ. D.DodsonR. J.et al. (1999). Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Science286, 1571–1577. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5444.1571
33
WuL.McGraneR. S.BeattieG. A. (2013). Light regulation of swarming motility in Pseudomonas syringae integrates signaling pathways mediated by a bacteriophytochrome and a LOV protein. MBio3, e00334–e00313. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00334-13
Summary
Keywords
Deinococcus radiodurans, bacteriophytochrome, BphP, BphR, light illumination, mitomycin C resistance
Citation
Jung J-H, Jeong S, Im S, Kim M-K, Seo HS and Lim S (2021) Lack of the Bacterial Phytochrome Protein Decreases Deinococcus radiodurans Resistance to Mitomycin C. Front. Microbiol. 12:659233. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.659233
Received
27 January 2021
Accepted
12 July 2021
Published
30 July 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Marie-Joelle Virolle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France
Reviewed by
Mark Gomelsky, University of Wyoming, United States; Masayoshi Nakasako, Keio University, Japan; John R. Battista, Louisiana State University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Jung, Jeong, Im, Kim, Seo and Lim.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sangyong Lim, saylim@kaeri.re.kr
This article was submitted to Microbial Physiology and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.