Abstract
Keratinases belong to a class of proteases that are able to degrade keratins into amino acids. Microbial keratinases play important roles in turning keratin-containing wastes into value-added products by participating in the degradation of keratin. Keratin is found in human and animal hard tissues, and its complicated structures make it resistant to degradation by common proteases. Although breaking disulfide bonds are involved in keratin degradation, keratinase is responsible for the cleavage of peptides, making it attractive in pharmaceutical and feather industries. Keratinase can serve as an important tool to convert keratin-rich wastes such as feathers from poultry industry into diverse products applicable to many fields. Despite of some progress made in isolating keratinase-producing microorganisms, structural studies of keratinases, and biochemical characterization of these enzymes, effort is still required to expand the biotechnological application of keratinase in diverse fields by identifying more keratinases, understanding the mechanism of action and constructing more active enzymes through molecular biology and protein engineering. Herein, this review covers structures, applications, biochemistry of microbial keratinases, and strategies to improve its efficiency in keratin degradation.
Introduction
Keratin is an important structural protein in some hard tissues in which it plays a protective role by forming a barrier between the organ and its environment. Keratin is a fibrous protein that is insoluble in water and other solvents. Due to the structure of keratin stabilized by disulfide bonds and hydrogen bonds, keratin is resistant to degradation by common proteases such as trypsin and pepsin. Keratin is one of the ubiquitous proteins in nature and found in many organs such as feather of birds, hair, wools, and nails of mammals (; ). Keratin is among the most abundant renewable organic polymers in nature after cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and chitin (; ). Keratin-containing wastes such as feathers from poultry industry represent an attractive resource for carbon, sulfur, and nitrogen that can be converted into other products ().
Keratinous wastes are rich in amino acids (Qiu et al., 2020) and could affect the atmosphere, water sources, and soil if they are not treated properly (). On the other hand, this type of wastes serves as a low-cost resource for amino acids or can be converted into animal feeds and fertilizers (Pettett and Ipek, 2004; ). Compared with other natural polymers such as cellulose, starch, and collagen, extraction of keratin is a challenging process. Quite a few strategies such as physical, chemical, and biological methods are applied in keratin extraction. Although chemical and physical treatments are efficient strategies to treat keratinous wastes, a large amount of energy is needed and amino acids were destroyed during treatment. As keratin does not accumulate in nature, microorganisms are playing the major role in its degradation and recycling. Therefore, keratinous wastes threatening the environment can be converted into value-added products by using microbial treatment (; ). Extensive studies have been carried out to search suitable microorganisms and obtain optimized processes to make full use of keratinous wastes (; Sangali and Brandelli, 2000; ; Rai and Mukherjee, 2011). It has been shown that wastes such as feathers can be degraded by bacteria and fungi to produce other important products such as amino acids or proteins with added values (; Shanmugasundaram et al., 2018; ; Tamreihao et al., 2019; ). Therefore, conversion of the wastes using microorganisms is the most environmentally friendly method while more studies are still needed to improve the degradation efficiency of keratins. As the amount of keratin-containing wastes is increasing rapidly due to various reasons, keratin derived from the wastes should be fully utilized by serving as a source of proteins, amino acids, and a low-cost resource for producing other products.
The structure of keratin explains their relatively stable existence and resistance to chemicals. Keratin can be classified as α-keratin and β-keratin according to the composition of amino acids and the secondary structure of polypeptide chains (, ; ). It is shown that α-keratin is mainly present in mammals and β-keratin is in avian and reptilian tissues. The polypeptide chains are packed into the final structure through disulfide bonds formed by cysteine residues, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions (Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018). Cysteine residues play a key role in the structural stability of keratin by forming intra- or intermolecular disulfide bonds (). Keratin is also classified as hard keratin and soft keratin based on the content of cysteine (). As basic units of keratin are polypeptides, keratinases play a major role in keratin degradation by breaking the disulfide bonds and peptidic bonds (; ; ). One of the features of keratinases is that they are able to cleave a sequence with hydrophobic residues at the P1 position (). Most keratinases were reported to degrade keratins in the presence of disulfide reducers or reducing agents while such reducing environment should not be required for a true keratinase (Qiu et al., 2020). Currently, the identified keratinases produced by microorganisms can be classified into at least 14 protease families (Qiu et al., 2020). In addition to journal publications, quite a few patent literatures reported preparation, extraction, and recombinant production of keratinases. The related patents can be obtained from different resources (Yahaya et al., 2021). Over 20,000 records can be obtained in google patent when keratinase was used as a searching keyword1. In this review, the structure and function of keratinases from bacteria and fungi are discussed. With accumulated knowledge in understanding microbial degradation of keratin, keratin-rich wastes are considered as a valuable and low-cost resource that can be converted into diverse products such as feed and fertilizers.
Mechanism of Action for Keratinase
Keratinases can be understood as a class of proteases that are able to degrade keratin by cleaving the peptide bonds (; Sahni et al., 2015). Although the identified keratinases are serine and metalloproteases that are able to break the peptide bond in peptide chains, they recognize hydrophobic substrates and affect the disulfide bonds. Most keratinases require other enzymes to break the disulfide, and two steps, namely, keratin peptide releasing and peptide degradation are included in keratin degradation. Reduction reaction can be catalyzed by disulfide reductases or reducing agents (Sangali and Brandelli, 2000; Rahayu et al., 2012; ). Microbial keratinases are usually secreted into the medium when the microorganism was cultivated in a keratin-containing medium (; ; ). This is not surprising as keratins are not soluble and not able to be transported into cells. Studies have shown that diverse keratinases with different molecular weights, optimal pH values, and optimal temperatures are produced by microorganisms. Most microbial keratinases are secreted into the extracellular matrix in the presence of keratin or keratin-containing substrates (Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018; ). Some microorganisms are able to produce extracellular and intracellular keratinases simultaneously. Cell-bound keratinases are also identified, and this type of enzymes might be of great interest for industrial application as well, which is due to the fact that they are immobilized on the cell surface and can be easily used in waste treatment. With the development of molecular biology and accumulation of genome sequences of microorganisms, microbial keratinases and their mechanism of keratin degradation can be predicted through bioinformatics (; Song et al., 2018; Pinski et al., 2020; Zolfaghari Emameh et al., 2021). A recent report showing a careful and detail classification of current keratinases provides a clear view to understand their mechanism of action and explains the requirement of multiple enzymes to achieve complete degradation of keratin or keratinous wastes (Qiu et al., 2020).
Keratinase-Producing Microorganisms
Keratinase-producing microorganisms are widely distributed in nature, and they can be readily isolated from the environment (Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018). Bacteria, fungi, and actinobacteria are able to produce keratinases and use keratin as the carbon and nitrogen sources in the minimal medium. To isolate a keratinase-producing microorganism, keratins or keratin-containing wastes such as feathers are usually present in the cultural medium, implying that microbial keratinase production is an inducible process (). To isolate keratinase-producing microorganisms, the following steps including sample collection, assay development, strain identification, and characterization are usually applied (Figure 1). First, samples need to be collected from the environment. The samples can be soils, keratin-containing wastes, or water that was contaminated with wastes (; ). Feathers are one of the most commonly used substrates in screening, and degradation of feathers can be readily monitored by observing the changes in shapes and releasing of proteins into the solution. It has been noted that several factors such as location, water content, keratin composition, and weather of the local environment need to be considered to make sure that a collection of microorganisms can be obtained. Second, a medium for the microorganism growth needs to be set up. As the media for enriching bacteria or fungi are different, a suitable medium is important in the screening (; ; ; Parrado et al., 2014; ). In addition, other parameters such as cultural time and temperature should be considered based on the experimental objectives. For example, if a team plans to isolate a thermally stable keratinase, a higher temperature in screening might enhance the rate of success (Wu et al., 2017). In the case of isolating microbial consortia, the enrichment step might not be important as it might reduce the content of certain microorganisms. Third, an assay for measuring protease activity should be set up for ranking keratin degradation efficiencies caused by different keratinases (). It will be useful to monitor both changes in the shape of keratin substrate and the composition of the proteins secreted by the microorganisms. Last, a reliable method for microorganism identification is needed (). In addition to identifying the amino acid sequence of the enzyme through analyzing the MS data carefully, knowing the genome of the screened microorganisms will provide more information to understand mechanism of action for the identified keratinase and a strategy to express certain types of enzymes (Sittipol et al., 2021).
FIGURE 1
Bacillus stains are the predominate bacteria that are able to produce keratinases. The species include Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus lichenifomis, and Bacillus cereus (Zaraî Jaouadi et al., 2015; ; ). Some other bacteria are able to degrade feathers with a high efficiency (; Zaraî Jaouadi et al., 2015; ; ; ). Keratin-degrading fungi can be isolated from some tissues of human and animals as the produced keratinase might be important for the fungal infection (; ; Zhang et al., 2019). It was shown that fungi such as Chrysosporium (; ) and Trichophyton (Zhang et al., 2019) were able to degrade keratins through their produced keratinases (Shadzi et al., 2002; ). Due to the function of keratins, keratinases in some pathogenic fungi might be essential for the invasion by breaking the barrier between the tissue and the environment. Streptomyces is the predominant actinobacterium that is able to produce keratinases (). Quite a few reports have shown that keratinolytic actinobacteria can be isolated from different environment. Some actinobacteria are able to produce thermally stable keratinases which have great potential to be widely used in industry (). The detail introduction of keratinase-producing microorganisms have been described in several reviews (Papadopoulos, 1989; Onifade et al., 1998; ; ; Sahni et al., 2015; ; Pahua-Ramos et al., 2017; Verma et al., 2017; ; ; Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018; ; ; ; Qiu et al., 2020; Yahaya et al., 2021).
Although many keratinase producers have been isolated and identified (; ; ; Nnolim et al., 2020b; Reis et al., 2020), the isolation and characterization of keratinase-producing microorganisms are still an important task. The keratin degradation efficiency can be improved when more keratinases are applied (Peng et al., 2019). Therefore, a mixture of microorganism-microbial consortia might have great potential in converting keratin-rich waste into valuable products (; ). It is challenging to have a microbial consortium because the amount of the organism in the system will be affected under different conditions. It is also possible to set up a microbial consortium to improve keratin degradation by mixing several microorganisms which have been well characterized. This is a feasible method in industrial applications.
Keratin Degradation by Keratinases
Several mechanisms have been proposed based on the accumulated studies (; ). The challenge in keratin degradation is due to the presence of high content of disulfide bonds (). As most keratinases are proteases responsible for breaking peptide bonds, other enzymes or chemicals are needed to affect the disulfide bonds and reduce the forces for keratin packing to make proteins accessible to the proteases (). Therefore, at least two steps including disulfide bond breakage and proteolysis are involved in keratin degradation (Figure 2). It has been noted that fungi and bacteria use similar ways to degrade keratins with a slight difference as mechanical destruction is also playing a role in degradation by fungi (). It was shown that mechanical destruction, production of inorganic sulfite, and involvement of disulfide reductase can contribute to the step of disulfide bond breakage (). In the protein degradation step, keratinases are able to break polypeptides into amino acids. There are several protease families responsible for keratin degradation (Qiu et al., 2020). To convert keratin into amino acids completely, multiple keratinases are required as different enzymes prefer to different cleavage sites. The diversity and classification of keratinase based on the amino acid sequence and conserved domains in MEROPS have been described in detail in a recent review (Qiu et al., 2020). Some disulfide reductases involved in keratin degradation were shown (; ; Table 1). The roles of these enzymes in keratin degradation have been described in other literatures, which will not be described here (; ; ; ).
FIGURE 2
TABLE 1
| Organism | Remarks | References |
| Bacillus halodurans PPKS-2 | This strain produces multiple enzymes such as keratinases and disulfide reductase. | Prakash et al., 2010b |
| Stenotrophomonas sp. D-1 | Cooperative action of a protease and a reductase was observed. | Yamamura et al., 2002 |
| Arthroderma benhamiae | Sulfite can be produced from cysteine by cysteine dioxygenase Cdo1. | |
| Bacillus licheniformis RG1 | Multiple enzymes are shown to be important for keratin degradation. | Ramnani et al., 2005 |
| Trichophyton mentagrophytes | Cysteine dioxygenase expression was studied. | , |
| Trichophyton mentagrophytes | A gene for expressing cysteine dioxygenase was obtained. | |
| Bacillus sp. MTS | Cysteine reductase improved keratin degradation. | Rahayu et al., 2012 |
| Keratin-degrading fungi | A study showed the classification of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases. | |
| Streptomyces pactum | Keratinases and reduction of disulfide bonds are important for feather degradation. |
Some studies on other enzymes important for keratin degradation are listed.
Accumulated studies have shown that the crude microbial culture exhibited higher keratin degradation efficiency than the purified enzymes. A keratinase-degrading system can be developed by carefully analyzing the components or enzymes that are critical for keratin degradation. The crude culture of a microorganism is a mixture of enzymes which can be used in keratin treatment. Therefore, a mixture of enzymes can be readily obtained by exploring the effects of cultural conditions on keratin degradation. Two important elements are important in this strategy. One is to have a good strain to work with and the other is to have an optimized fermentation condition to produce an enzymatic system for keratin degradation.
Structure of Keratinase
Keratinases are serine and metalloproteases, and their active sites are formed by several conserved residues. Crystal structures of several keratinases demonstrate the structural basis for their activity and provide insights into designing more stable and efficient enzymes for industrial applications (; ). These structures can also be utilized as a template to obtain homology models of other keratinases ().
The crystal structure of a serine protease from family S8 produced by Tritirachium album was obtained (Figure 3; ). Crystal structures of other two members, namely, Fervidolysin from Fervidobacterium pennivorans () and rMtaKer from Meiothermus taiwanensis WR-220 (Wu et al., 2017) in S8 family were also determined (Figure 3). Proteases in this family contain both α and β structures. Despite their difference in overall folding, these proteases contain a conserved catalytic triad formed by Asp, His, and Ser residues which are critical for the cleavage of peptide bonds (Figure 3). In addition to determining the folding of the active site in this type of proteases, the structure of rMtaKer provides the molecular basis for substrate and protease interactions (Wu et al., 2017). The molecular interaction between P1–P4 residues and the protease was well resolved, which paved a way to design a suitable substrate for enzymatic assays (Wu et al., 2017; Figure 4). In addition, the structures of these proteases also provide insights into the structural basis for the thermal stability of the enzyme, which is useful for improving the stability of keratinases through site-directed mutagenesis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
A crystal structure of keratin-degrading enzyme from Paenarthrobacter nicotinovorans was determined (Figure 3; Teruo et al., 2015). This protease consists of mainly β-sheets to form two β-barrels. The active site with the catalytic triad formed by His43, Asp92, and Ser171 is located between these two barrels (Teruo et al., 2015). The catalytic mechanism of these serine proteases has been well described. The following steps are critical for substrate degradation. The substrate needs to bind to the active site, followed by the peptide cleavage and release of the shorter segments. Proteases from M32 family have different secondary structures. A crystal structure of FisCP from Fervidobacterium islandicum AW-1 showed that the protease contained main helical structures with a short β-sheet close to the active site. The active site contains several amino acids (His253, Glue254, His257, and Glue283) and a Co2+ atom which is important for coordination of the substrate (Figure 3).
Biochemistry of Keratinases
Based on the identified enzymes and the sequences deposited in databases, the molecular weights of keratinase range from 20 to 130 kDa (; Sharma and Devi, 2018; Pinski et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2020). The optimal conditions for enzymatic activity are diverse as different enzymes prefer different pH values, temperatures, and substrates (Tatineni et al., 2007; Tiwary and Gupta, 2010b; Rai and Mukherjee, 2011; ; ; ). The classification of keratinases based on the amino acid sequence provides a unique and clear view toward the function and mechanism of keratinases (Qiu et al., 2020), which suggests that obtaining the amino acid sequence of the newly identified keratinases is an important task. Although the effect of keratinase producers on breaking disulfide bonds should be measured (), most studies explored the capabilities of breaking peptide bonds by keratinases (; ; ; Omrane Benmrad et al., 2019). To validate the capability to degrade keratin, several substrates were adopted in the enzymatic assay (; ; Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Substrate | Assay | References |
| Azo-keratin | Measuring absorbance at 450 nm | ; |
| Keratin azure | Tork et al., 2013, 2016 | |
| Feather | Measuring absorbance at 280 nm | |
| Feather powder | ; Qu et al., 2018 | |
| Cow horn | ||
| Wool top | ||
| Recombinant feather keratin | ||
| Human hair | Measuring absorbance at 280 nm or using other reagents | ; |
| Azocasein | Measuring absorbance at 366 nm | Tork et al., 2013, 2016 |
| Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA | Mearing absorbance at 405 nm | ; ; |
| Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Leu-pNA | ||
| Bz-Arg-pNA | ||
| Bz-Phe-Val-Arg-pNa | Rozs et al., 2001 | |
| Bz-Ile-Gly-Glu-Arg-pNA | ||
| Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Try-AMC (tetrapeptide) | Fluorescence assay | |
| Leu-AMC | ; Silveira et al., 2009; | |
| Short peptides | Reversed-phase chromatography | |
| Casein | Absorbance at 660 nm |
Substrates used for analyzing keratinase activity.
Two types of the substrate were frequently used in the assays (Table 2). One type is the natural keratin such as feathers, wool, and pig bristles or the substrate derived from keratin-rich materials (; ). As the solubility of the natural keratin is low, it is challenging to compare the enzymatic activities of keratinases obtained from different studies. Azo-keratin is frequently used as a substrate of keratinase and can be prepared using keratin derived from different sources (; ). Azo-keratin is not a commercial product and is prepared by coupling keratins with a diazotized aryl amide to result in a deep red-orange compound (Riffel et al., 2003). The activity of keratinase is obtained by measuring changes of absorbance at 450 nm. Azo-keratin derived from different keratin-containing materials will be different and might not be an ideal substrate to compare enzymatic activities obtained from different laboratories (Riffel et al., 2003; Qiu et al., 2020). Keratin azure is another frequently used substrate in keratinase assay (; ; Tork et al., 2016). The enzymatic activity was defined according to the changes of the absorbance at 450 nm after mixing substrate with enzyme for a certain time (; Tork et al., 2016). Keratin azure is commercially available and very suitable for characterization of keratinases with a preference to degrade α-keratins. Keratin-containing materials such as feathers are also frequently utilized in biochemical assays in which feather degradation can be detected through observing the release of amino acids, the shape changes of feathers, and reduction of feather mass (; ; ; Wu et al., 2017; ; Peng et al., 2019). The advantage of using natural keratin is that the keratin-degrading capability of keratinases can be evaluated directly (; Thankaswamy et al., 2018). The disadvantage is that the substrate degradation requires collaborative effort of different types of enzymes. The native substrate might not reflect the biochemical parameters of a single enzyme. A recent study applied recombinant feather protein in the protease assay. The recombinant protein was soluble in solution, giving rise to accurate analysis of the keratinase (). Therefore, purified enzymes and modified substrates are critical for characterizing the enzymes.
The other type of substrates soluble in solution was applied in the enzymatic assay (). Azocasein was utilized in several studies to determine whether a protein harbors protease activity (Tork et al., 2013, 2016). It is a non-specific protease substrate and its hydrolysis results in releases of the azo dye which can be detected by monitoring the absorbance at 366 nm (Tork et al., 2013, 2016). Synthetic peptides were also useful in the protease assays. As the sequence of the peptidic substrates can be modified easily, this type of assay can be utilized to explore the most suitable substrate for a keratinase (). The cleavage of peptides are able to be monitored using reversed-phase chromatography while this method is not a robust assay (). Peptidic substrates containing p-nitroanilide (pNA) were used to study the preference for P1 and P2 residues (; ; Zaraî Jaouadi et al., 2015; ). As the release of pNA can be detected by measuring the absorbance at 405 nm, pNA derivatives are very suitable to explore the effect of environmental conditions and other chemicals on the activity of keratinases (Rozs et al., 2001). Several keratinases produced by Bacillus sp. have been characterized using this type of substrates (). Fluorogenic substrates containing amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) have been widely utilized in the enzymatic assays of serine proteases (; Silveira et al., 2009). The substrate cleavage can be confirmed with fluorescence spectroscopy. This method is very sensitive and provides an accurate way to characterize proteases. Effect of ions on keratinase activity was explored using AMC-derived substrates (). Based on accumulated studies, it is a good strategy to adopt multiple protease assays to characterize keratinases obtained from different microorganisms, which will provide an insightful view to these enzymes. The biochemical features of keratinases can be obtained from several reviews (Onifade et al., 1998; ; Sahni et al., 2015; ; Pahua-Ramos et al., 2017; Sharma and Devi, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019; ; Qiu et al., 2020). The crystal structure of rMtaKer provides useful information for the molecular interaction between the enzyme and a peptide sequence from the C-terminal of this enzyme (Figure 4; Wu et al., 2017). This structure will be useful for designing a suitable substrate for enzymatic assays.
In summary, a sensitive biochemical assay needs to be set up as different keratinases may prefer different substrates. In addition, effects of different additives such as reducing reagents on keratin degradation could provide useful insights into understanding keratin degradation and expanding the application of these enzymes.
Microbial Production of Keratinases
Application of keratinases in industry requires a large amount of enzymes. Therefore, fermentation is essential to produce these enzymes in a large scale to meet the demands from industry (Zaghloul et al., 2011). Fermentation parameters such as carbon source, nitrogen source, temperature, and others need to be optimized as these parameters have an impact on the production of the keratinase. Wastes from industries such as feathers can be added into the cultural medium (). In addition, other wastes such as wheat and soy beans can be used as a substrate for producing keratinases (Syed et al., 2009; Prakash et al., 2010a). Interestingly, a study showed that glucose and ammonium nitrate are not good sources for growing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to degrade feathers (Qu et al., 2018). Accumulated studies suggest that different microorganisms require various fermentation conditions for large-scale production, indicating that careful exploratory studies are necessary prior to the large-scale production of the enzymes (; ; ; Sharma and Kango, 2021). It was demonstrated that the solid-state fermentation increased keratinase production compared with the commonly used submerged fermentation (). In addition to feathers and human hair used in solid-state fermentation, other low-cost resources from agriculture can be considered in fermentation ().
Recombinant techniques are applied to the production of keratinases (; ; ; Yong et al., 2020; Yahaya et al., 2021). This method is particularly meaningful for keratinases that are produced by pathogenic microorganisms () and the mutants with an improved enzymatic activity and stability (Zhang et al., 2020). The recombinant production of keratinases does not require the application of keratin as the carbon and nitrogen sources. It is possible to purify the recombinant enzymes in a fast way when an affinity purification tag is introduced. Several studies demonstrate that it is feasible to produce recombinant keratinases. Keratinases from bacteria can be produced in Escherichia coli (Tiwary and Gupta, 2010a). It has been shown that the gene kerA encoding a keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis was expressed in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis while the yield was lower than that of the wild type. An improved yield was observed by integration of multiple copies of kerA into the chromosome (Wang et al., 2004). Therefore, producing keratinases using recombinant techniques is of great interest while extensive studies are still needed to obtain the recombinant keratinase with an improved activity.
The purification of keratinases is important for enzymatic characterization and other application (). In waste treatment, the enzyme purification is not needed for reducing cost and improving efficiency. To obtain a keratinase with a high purity, several strategies can be utilized. Ammonium sulfate precipitation, gel filtration chromatography, and ion-exchange chromatography are commonly used methods in the purification (). For recombinant proteins, the affinity chromatography can be used in purification based on the affinity tag that is incorporated into the target protein. Keratinases from different bacteria have been purified for biochemical characterization. Techniques such as the aqueous two-phase system are applicable to obtain a large amount of enzymes (; Sala et al., 2014). A carefully experimental design is vital when a large quantity of pure enzymes is needed as the purification could be an expensive step.
It has been noted that recombinant techniques are still needed for producing keratinases with a high purity, keratinases with mutations, and keratinases originated from a pathogenic microorganism (). Recombinant protein expression systems and host and gene cloning strategies need to be explored (). As the recombinant protein is critical for exploring the function of keratinases, it is useful in studying the function and activity of the enzymes.
Application of Keratinases
Keratin exists widely in nature and is a valuable source of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur which can be converted into diverse products (; Wang et al., 2016). Keratinases have extensive industrial and biotechnological applications due to their ability to degrade keratins (Onifade et al., 1998; ; Rai et al., 2009; Syed et al., 2009; ; Sahni et al., 2015; ; ; Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018). Their applications are summarized (Figure 5) and have been described in several literatures (; ; Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018; ; ).
FIGURE 5
Improvement of Keratinases
To improve the activity and thermal stability of keratinases, mutagenesis was applied (; Wang et al., 2015; ; Su et al., 2019). The mutagenesis studies were carried out by treating whole cells with reagents and modifying genes using molecular biology. In a study, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) was used to treat the whole cells of Bacillus subtilis LFB-FIOCRUZ 1266, and the resulting mutant strains exhibited higher feather hydrolysis compared with the wild-type strain (). Treatment of feather-degrading Deinococcus ficus with UV resulted in mutants with an improved and decreased keratinolytic activity (Zeng et al., 2011). Other chemical reagents such as ethidium bromide (EtBr) and N-methy-N’-nitro-N-nitroso-guanidine (MNG) were also able to cause mutations in the genes, which affected the keratinase activity (; Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018).
Protein engineering was also applied to cause an augmentation of the keratinase activity (). When the amino acid sequence and structure of a keratinase are available, the rational protein design can play a role in improving the activity and thermal stability of a keratinase. When amino acids essential for the protease activity, metal binding, and thermal stability are identified, computer-based methods will enable researchers to design proteins with improved enzymatic activities and thermal stabilities. This strategy has been successfully applied to the keratinase of Bacillus licheniformis BBE11 (). Four amino acid substitutions (N122Y, N217S, A193P, N160C) were designed, and the corresponding genes were expressed in Bacillus subtilis WB60. A mutant keratinase with the N122Y substitution exhibited an approximately 5.6-fold increase in catalytic efficiency, suggesting that this is an efficient strategy in improving activity and stability (). Other methods such as PCR-based methods and direct evolution will play a role in obtaining more potent keratinases (Vidmar and Vodovnik, 2018). When the regulatory mechanism of a keratinase is understood, the modification on other regions of the keratinase can also improve its activity and stability (; Peng et al., 2021). In a study, the N- and C-terminal regions of KerSMD were replaced with those regions of a homogenous keratinase. Replacing the N-terminal region resulted in a mutant exhibiting more than a twofold catalytic activity toward casein catalytic efficiency. Replacing the C-terminal region improved keratinases activity using succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide as a substrate in a biochemical assay. Replacing both N- and C-terminal regions resulted in a mutant with an improved thermal stability ().
It is important to improve the enzymatic characteristics of the keratinase while caution has to be taken when the whole-cell-based mutagenesis is used. All the mutant strains should meet the safety requirement from certain authorities. Compared with random mutagenesis, structure-guided protein engineering is of great interest as the mutation is well managed. To carry out such studies efficiently, the amino acid sequence and structures need to be known. Recombinant protein production is therefore a strategy to play an important role in this process. Researchers have to make sure that the strains with modified genes are acceptable in industrial applications.
Conclusion
Keratin is a rich resource in nature, and the amount of keratin-rich wastes is increasing annually. Keratinases play important roles in keratin recycle and have diverse applications in different fields. Studies need to be carried out to obtain active enzymes and enlarge their applications. Microbiology, molecular biology, structural biology, computation and biochemistry will play important roles in the research field of keratinases.
Statements
Author contributions
QL drafted and revised the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by funds from the “Hundred-Talent Program” (Grant Nos. 2020GDASYL-20200102010 and 2020GDASYL-20200102009), Guangdong Academy of Sciences, China.
Acknowledgments
QL appreciates the support from Institute of Bioengineering, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, China.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
References
1
Abdel-NabyM. A.El-RefaiH. A.IbrahimM. H. A. (2017). Structural characterization, catalytic, kinetic and thermodynamic properties of Keratinase from Bacillus pumilus FH9.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.105973–980. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.118
2
AnbuP.HildaA.SurH.-W.HurB.-K.JayanthiS. (2008). Extracellular keratinase from Trichophyton sp. HA-2 isolated from feather dumping soil.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation62287–292. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.07.017
3
ArokiyarajS.VargheseR.Ali AhmedB.DuraipandiyanV.Al-DhabiN. A. (2019). Optimizing the fermentation conditions and enhanced production of keratinase from Bacillus cereus isolated from halophilic environment.Saudi J. Biol. Sci.26378–381. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.10.011
4
AwadG. E. A.EsawyM. A.SalamW. A.SalamaB. M.AbdelkaderA. F.El-diwanyA. (2011). Keratinase production by Bacillus pumilus GHD in solid-state fermentation using sugar cane bagasse: optimisation of culture conditions using a Box-Behnken experimental design.Ann. Microbiol.61663–672. 10.1007/s13213-010-0187-0
5
BachE.Sant’AnnaV.DaroitD. J.CorrêaA. P. F.SegalinJ.BrandelliA. (2012). Production, one-step purification, and characterization of a keratinolytic protease from Serratia marcescens P3.Process Biochem.472455–2462. 10.1016/j.procbio.2012.10.007
6
BakhtiarS.EstiveiraR. J.Hatti-KaulR. (2005). Substrate specificity of alkaline protease from alkaliphilic feather-degrading Nesterenkonia sp. AL20.Enzyme Microb. Technol.37534–540. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.04.003
7
BaroneJ. R.SchmidtW. F.LiebnerC. F. E. (2005). Thermally processed keratin films.J. Appl. Polymer Sci.971644–1651. 10.1002/app.21901
8
BealerE. J.Onissema-KarimuS.Rivera-GallettiA.FrancisM.WilkowskiJ.Salas-de la CruzD.et al (2020). Protein–Polysaccharide composite materials: fabrication and applications.Polymers12:464.
9
Ben ElhoulM.Zaraî JaouadiN.RekikH.Omrane BenmradM.MechriS.MoujehedE.et al (2016). Biochemical and molecular characterization of new keratinoytic protease from Actinomadura viridilutea DZ50.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.92299–315. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.009
10
BenkiarA.NadiaZ. J.BadisA.RebzaniF.SorayaB. T.RekikH.et al (2013). Biochemical and molecular characterization of a thermo- and detergent-stable alkaline serine keratinolytic protease from Bacillus circulans strain DZ100 for detergent formulations and feather-biodegradation process.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation83129–138. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.05.014
11
BetzelC.GourinathS.KumarP.KaurP.PerbandtM.EschenburgS.et al (2001). Structure of a serine protease proteinase K from Tritirachium album limber at 0.98 Å resolution.Biochemistry403080–3088. 10.1021/bi002538n
12
BhariR.KaurM.Sarup SinghR. (2021). Chicken feather waste hydrolysate as a superior biofertilizer in agroindustry.Curr. Microbiol.782212–2230. 10.1007/s00284-021-02491-z
13
BhariR.KaurM.SinghR. S.PandeyA.LarrocheC. (2018). Bioconversion of chicken feathers by Bacillus aerius NSMk2: a potential approach in poultry waste management.Bioresour. Technol. Rep.3224–230. 10.1016/j.biteb.2018.07.015
14
BöckleB.GalunskyB.MüllerR. (1995). Characterization of a keratinolytic serine proteinase from Streptomyces pactum DSM 40530.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.613705–3710.
15
BockleB.MullerR. (1997). Reduction of disulfide bonds by Streptomyces pactum during growth on chicken feathers.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63790–792.
16
BohaczJ. (2016). Biodegradation of feather waste keratin by a keratinolytic soil fungus of the genus Chrysosporium and statistical optimization of feather mass loss.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.33:13. 10.1007/s11274-016-2177-2
17
BohaczJ. (2019). Changes in mineral forms of nitrogen and sulfur and enzymatic activities during composting of lignocellulosic waste and chicken feathers.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.2610333–10342. 10.1007/s11356-019-04453-2
18
BohaczJ.Korniłłowicz-KowalskaT. (2019). Fungal diversity and keratinolytic activity of fungi from lignocellulosic composts with chicken feathers.Process Biochem.80119–128. 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.02.012
19
BouacemK.Bouanane-DarenfedA.Zaraî JaouadiN.JosephM.HaceneH.OllivierB.et al (2016). Novel serine keratinase from Caldicoprobacter algeriensis exhibiting outstanding hide dehairing abilities.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.86321–328. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.074
20
BrandelliA.DaroitD. J.RiffelA. (2010). Biochemical features of microbial keratinases and their production and applications.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.851735–1750. 10.1007/s00253-009-2398-5
21
BrandelliA.SalaL.KalilS. J. (2015). Microbial enzymes for bioconversion of poultry waste into added-value products.Food Res. Int.733–12. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.01.015
22
BuskP. K.LangeL. (2015). Classification of fungal and bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases.BMC Genomics16:368. 10.1186/s12864-015-1601-6
23
CaiC.-G.LouB.-G.ZhengX.-D. (2008). Keratinase production and keratin degradation by a mutant strain of Bacillus subtilis.J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B960–67. 10.1631/jzus.B061620
24
CãlinM.Constantinescu-AruxandeiD.AlexandrescuE.RãutI.DoniM. B.ArseneM.-L.et al (2017). Degradation of keratin substrates by keratinolytic fungi.Electron. J. Biotechnol.28101–112. 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.05.007
25
CallegaroK.WelterN.DaroitD. J. (2018). Feathers as bioresource: microbial conversion into bioactive protein hydrolysates.Process Biochem.751–9. 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.09.002
26
CavelloI.UrbietaM. S.CavalittoS.DonatiE. (2020). Bacillus cytotoxicus isolated from a pristine natural geothermal area reveals high keratinolytic activity.Microorganisms8:796.
27
ChaturvediV.BhangeK.BhattR.VermaP. (2014). Production of kertinases using chicken feathers as substrate by a novel multifunctional strain of Pseudomonas stutzeri and its dehairing application.Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.3167–174. 10.1016/j.bcab.2013.08.005
28
ChaudharyL.SiddiquiM. H.VimalA.BhargavaP. (2021). Biological degradation of keratin by microbial keratinase for effective waste management and potent industrial applications.Curr. Protein Pept. Sci.22:CPPS-EPUB-114223. 10.2174/1389203722666210215151952
29
ChilakamarryC. R.MahmoodS.SaffeS. N. B. M.ArifinM. A. B.GuptaA.SikkandarM. Y.et al (2021). Extraction and application of keratin from natural resources: a review.3 Biotech11:220. 10.1007/s13205-021-02734-7
30
De AzeredoL. A. I.De LimaM. B.CoelhoR. R. R.FreireD. M. G. (2006). Thermophilic protease production by Streptomyces sp. 594 in submerged and solid-state fermentations using feather meal.J. Appl. Microbiol.100641–647. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02791.x
31
de MenezesC. L. A.SantosR. D. C.SantosM. V.BoscoloM.da SilvaR.GomesE.et al (2021). Industrial sustainability of microbial keratinases: production and potential applications.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.37:86. 10.1007/s11274-021-03052-z
32
de PaivaD. P.de OliveiraS. S. A.MazottoA. M.VermelhoA. B.de OliveiraS. S. (2018). Keratinolytic activity of Bacillus subtilis LFB-FIOCRUZ 1266 enhanced by whole-cell mutagenesis.3 Biotech9:2. 10.1007/s13205-018-1527-1
33
DemirkanE.KutD.SevgiT.DoganM.BayginE. (2020). Investigation of effects of protease enzyme produced by Bacillus subtilis 168 E6-5 and commercial enzyme on physical properties of woolen fabric.J. Textile Inst.11126–35. 10.1080/00405000.2019.1624069
34
DenizI.DemirT.OncelS. S.HamesE. E.Vardar-SukanF. (2021). Effect of agitation and aeration on keratinase production in bioreactors using bioprocess engineering aspects.Protein J.10.1007/s10930-021-09978-5
35
DescampsF.BroutaF.VermoutS.MonodM.LossonB.MignonB. (2003). Recombinant expression and antigenic properties of a 31.5-kDa keratinolytic subtilisin-like serine protease from Microsporum canis.FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.3829–34. 10.1016/s0928-8244(03)00101-9
36
DozieI. N. S.OkekeC. N.UnaezeN. C. (1994). A thermostable, alkaline-active, keratinolytic proteinase from chrysosporium keratinophilum.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.10563–567. 10.1007/BF00367668
37
FakhfakhN.KtariN.HaddarA.MnifI. H.DahmenI.NasriM. (2011). Total solubilisation of the chicken feathers by fermentation with a keratinolytic bacterium, Bacillus pumilus A1, and the production of protein hydrolysate with high antioxidative activity.Process Biochem.461731–1737. 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.05.023
38
FangN.ZhongC.-Q.LiangX.TangX.-F.TangB. (2010). Improvement of extracellular production of a thermophilic subtilase expressed in Escherichia coli by random mutagenesis of its N-terminal propeptide.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.851473–1481. 10.1007/s00253-009-2183-5
39
FangZ.ShaC.PengZ.ZhangJ.DuG. (2019). Protein engineering to enhance keratinolytic protease activity and excretion in Escherichia coli and its scale-up fermentation for high extracellular yield.Enzyme Microb. Technol.12137–44. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.11.003
40
FangZ.ZhangJ.DuG.ChenJ. (2016a). Improved catalytic efficiency, thermophilicity, anti-salt and detergent tolerance of keratinase KerSMD by partially truncation of PPC domain.Sci. Rep.6:27953. 10.1038/srep27953
41
FangZ.ZhangJ.LiuB.DuG.ChenJ. (2013). Biochemical characterization of three keratinolytic enzymes from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BBE11-1 for biodegrading keratin wastes.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation82166–172. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.03.008
42
FangZ.ZhangJ.LiuB.DuG.ChenJ. (2016b). Enhancement of the catalytic efficiency and thermostability of Stenotrophomonas sp. keratinase KerSMD by domain exchange with KerSMF.Microb. Biotechnol.935–46. 10.1111/1751-7915.12300
43
FangZ.ZhangJ.LiuB.JiangL.DuG.ChenJ. (2014). Cloning, heterologous expression and characterization of two keratinases from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BBE11-1.Process Biochem.49647–654. 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.01.009
44
FlückgerS.IgaretaN. V.SeebeckF. P. (2020). Convergent evolution of fungal cysteine dioxygenases.ChemBioChem213082–3086. 10.1002/cbic.202000317
45
FraserR. D. B.ParryD. A. D. (2008). Molecular packing in the feather keratin filament.J. Struct. Biol.1621–13. 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.01.011
46
FraserR. D. B.ParryD. A. D. (2011). The structural basis of the filament-matrix texture in the avian/reptilian group of hard β-keratins.J. Struct. Biol.173391–405. 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.09.020
47
FriedrichJ.GradišarH.MandinD.ChaumontJ. P. (1999). Screening fungi for synthesis of keratinolytic enzymes.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.28127–130. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00485.x
48
GegeckasA.GudiukaitëR.CitaviciusD. (2014). Keratinolytic proteinase from Bacillus thuringiensis AD-12.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.6946–51. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.05.024
49
GegeckasA.ŠimkutëA.GudiukaitëR.ČitavičiusD. J. (2018). Characterization and application of keratinolytic paptidases from Bacillus spp.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.1131206–1213. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.046
50
GongJ.-S.YeJ.-P.TaoL.-Y.SuC.QinJ.ZhangY.-Y.et al (2020). Efficient keratinase expression via promoter engineering strategies for degradation of feather wastes.Enzyme Microb. Technol.137:109550. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109550
51
GonzaloM.EspersenR.Al-SoudW. A.Cristiano FalcoF.HägglundP.SørensenS. J.et al (2020). Azo dying of α-keratin material improves microbial keratinase screening and standardization.Microb. Biotechnol.13984–996. 10.1111/1751-7915.13541
52
GradišarH.KernS.FriedrichJ. (2000). Keratinase of Doratomyces microsporus.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.53196–200. 10.1007/s002530050008
53
GrumbtM.MonodM.YamadaT.HertweckC.KunertJ.StaibP. (2013). Keratin degradation by dermatophytes relies on cysteine dioxygenase and a sulfite efflux pump.J. Invest. Dermatol.1331550–1555. 10.1038/jid.2013.41
54
GuptaR.RamnaniP. (2006). Microbial keratinases and their prospective applications: an overview.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.70:21. 10.1007/s00253-005-0239-8
55
GuptaS.TewatiaP.MisriJ.SinghR. (2017). Molecular modeling of cloned Bacillus subtilis keratinase and its insinuation in psoriasis treatment using docking studies.Indian J. Microbiol.57485–491. 10.1007/s12088-017-0677-x
56
GuravR. G.JadhavJ. P. (2013). A novel source of biofertilizer from feather biomass for banana cultivation.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.204532–4539. 10.1007/s11356-012-1405-z
57
GurungS. K.AdhikariM.KimS. W.BazieS.KimH. S.LeeH. G.et al (2018). Discovery of two Chrysosporium species with keratinolytic activity from field soil in Korea.Mycobiology46260–268. 10.1080/12298093.2018.1514732
58
HamicheS.MechriS.KhelouiaL.AnnaneR.El HattabM.BadisA.et al (2019). Purification and biochemical characterization of two keratinases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S13 isolated from marine brown alga Zonaria tournefortii with potential keratin-biodegradation and hide-unhairing activities.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.122758–769. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.174
59
HassanM. A.Abol-FotouhD.OmerA. M.TamerT. M.AbbasE. (2020). Comprehensive insights into microbial keratinases and their implication in various biotechnological and industrial sectors: a review.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.154567–583. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.116
60
HerzogB.OveryD. P.HaltliB.KerrR. G. (2016). Discovery of keratinases using bacteria isolated from marine environments.Syst. Appl. Microbiol.3949–57. 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.10.004
61
IglesiasM. S.SequeirosC.GarcíaS.OliveraN. L. (2017). Newly isolated Bacillus sp. G51 from Patagonian wool produces an enzyme combination suitable for felt-resist treatments of organic wool.Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.40833–842. 10.1007/s00449-017-1748-4
62
InácioF. D.MartinsA. F.ContatoA. G.BrugnariT.PeraltaR. M.SouzaC. G. M. D. (2018). Biodegradation of human keratin by protease from the basidiomycete Pleurotus pulmonarius.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation127124–129. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.11.010
63
JagadeesanY.MeenakshisundaramS.SaravananV.BalaiahA. (2020). Sustainable production, biochemical and molecular characterization of thermo-and-solvent stable alkaline serine keratinase from novel Bacillus pumilus AR57 for promising poultry solid waste management.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.163135–146. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.219
64
JaouadiB.AbdelmalekB.FodilD.FerradjiF. Z.RekikH.ZaraîN.et al (2010). Purification and characterization of a thermostable keratinolytic serine alkaline proteinase from Streptomyces sp. strain AB1 with high stability in organic solvents.Bioresour. Technol.1018361–8369. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.066
65
JaouadiN. Z.RekikH.BadisA.TrabelsiS.BelhoulM.YahiaouiA. B.et al (2013). Biochemical and molecular characterization of a serine keratinase from Brevibacillus brevis US575 with promising keratin-biodegradation and hide-dehairing activities.PLoS One8:e76722. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076722
66
JayalakshmiT.KrishnamoorthyP. K. P.KumarG. R.SivamaniP. S. P. (2010). Isolation and screening of a feather-degrading keratinolytic actinomycetes from Actinomyces sp.J. Am. Sci.645–48.
67
Jeevana LakshmiP.Kumari ChitturiC. M.LakshmiV. V. (2013). Efficient degradation of feather by keratinase producing Bacillus sp.Int. J. Microbiol.2013:7. 10.1155/2013/608321
68
JinH.-S.ParkS. Y.KimK.LeeY.-J.NamG.-W.KangN. J.et al (2017). Development of a keratinase activity assay using recombinant chicken feather keratin substrates.PLoS One12:e0172712. 10.1371/journal.pone.0172712
69
KangD.JacquiodS.HerschendJ.WeiS.NesmeJ.SørensenS. J. (2020). Construction of simplified microbial consortia to degrade recalcitrant materials based on enrichment and dilution-to-extinction cultures.Front. Microbiol.10:3010. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03010
70
KanoksilapathamW.IntagunW. (2017). A review: biodegradation and applications of keratin degrading microorganisms and keratinolytic enzymes, focusing on thermophiles and thermostable serine proteases.Am. J. Appl. Sci.141016–1023. 10.3844/ajassp.2017.1016.1023
71
KasperovaA.CahlikovaR.KunertJ.SebelaM.NovakZ.RaskaM. (2014). Exposition of dermatophyte Trichophyton mentagrophytes to L-cystine induces expression and activation of cysteine dioxygenase.Mycoses57672–678. 10.1111/myc.12220
72
KasperovaA.KunertJ.HorynovaM.WeiglE.SebelaM.LenobelR.et al (2011). Isolation of recombinant cysteine dioxygenase protein from Trichophyton mentagrophytes.Mycoses54e456–e462. 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01948.x
73
KasperovaA.KunertJ.RaskaM. (2013). The possible role of dermatophyte cysteine dioxygenase in keratin degradation.Med. Mycol.51449–454. 10.3109/13693786.2013.794310
74
KhodayariS.KafilzadehF. (2018). Separating keratinase producer bacteria from the soil of poultry farms and optimization of the conditions for maximum enzyme production.Eur. J. Exp. Biol.8:35. 10.21767/2248-9215.100076
75
KimJ. M.LimW. J.SuhH. J. (2001). Feather-degrading Bacillus species from poultry waste.Process Biochem.37287–291. 10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00206-0
76
KimJ. M. K. U.ChoiY. M. S. C.SuhH. J. K. U. (2005). Preparation of feather digests as fertilizer with Bacillus pumilis KHS-1.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.15427–476.
77
KimJ.-S.KluskensL. D.de VosW. M.HuberR.van der OostJ. (2004). Crystal structure of fervidolysin from Fervidobacterium pennivorans, a keratinolytic enzyme related to subtilisin.J. Mol. Biol.335787–797. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.006
78
KluskensL. D.VoorhorstW. G.SiezenR. J.SchwerdtfegerR. M.AntranikianG.van der OostJ.et al (2002). Molecular characterization of fervidolysin, a subtilisin-like serine protease from the thermophilic bacterium Fervidobacterium pennivorans.Extremophiles6185–194. 10.1007/s007920100239
79
KorkmazH.HurH.DincerS. (2004). Characterization of alkaline keratinase of Bacillus licheniformis strain HK-1 from poultry waste.Ann. Microbiol.54201–211.
80
Korniłłowicz-KowalskaT.BohaczJ. (2011). Biodegradation of keratin waste: theory and practical aspects.Waste Manag.311689–1701. 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.024
81
KowalczykP.Mahdi-OraibiS.MisiewiczA.GabzdylN.MiskiewiczA.SzpareckiG. (2018). Feather-Degrading bacteria: their biochemical and genetic characteristics.Arab. J. Sci. Eng.4333–41. 10.1007/s13369-017-2700-2
82
KumarA. (2020). Aspergillus nidulans: a potential resource of the production of the native and heterologous enzymes for industrial applications.Int. J. Microbiol.2020:8894215. 10.1155/2020/8894215
83
LabaW.RodziewiczA. (2014). Biodegradation of hard keratins by two Bacillus Strains.Jundishapur. J. Microbiol.7:e8896. 10.5812/jjm.8896
84
LangeL.HuangY.BuskP. K. (2016). Microbial decomposition of keratin in nature-a new hypothesis of industrial relevance.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1002083–2096. 10.1007/s00253-015-7262-1
85
LeeY.-J.DhanasinghI.AhnJ.-S.JinH.-S.ChoiJ. M.LeeS. H.et al (2015). Biochemical and structural characterization of a keratin-degrading M32 carboxypeptidase from Fervidobacterium islandicum AW-1.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.468927–933. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.058
86
LiF.WangY.LiC.Marquez-LagoT. T.LeierA.RawlingsN. D.et al (2018). Twenty years of bioinformatics research for protease-specific substrate and cleavage site prediction: a comprehensive revisit and benchmarking of existing methods.Brief. Bioinform.202150–2166. 10.1093/bib/bby077
87
LiQ. (2019). Progress in microbial degradation of feather waste.Front. Microbiol.10:2717. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02717
88
LiZ.-W.LiangS.KeY.DengJ.-J.ZhangM.-S.LuD.-L.et al (2020). The feather degradation mechanisms of a new Streptomyces sp. isolate SCUT-3.Commun. Biol.3:191. 10.1038/s42003-020-0918-0
89
LinX.LeeC.-G.CasaleE. S.ShihJ. C. H. (1992). Purification and characterization of a keratinase from a feather-degrading Bacillus licheniformis Strain.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.583271–3275.
90
LiuB.ZhangJ.FangZ.GuL.LiaoX.DuG.et al (2013a). Enhanced thermostability of keratinase by computational design and empirical mutation.J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.40697–704. 10.1007/s10295-013-1268-4
91
LiuB.ZhangJ.GuL.DuG.ChenJ.LiaoX. (2014). Comparative analysis of bacterial expression systems for keratinase production.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.1731222–1235. 10.1007/s12010-014-0925-z
92
LiuB.ZhangJ.LiB.LiaoX.DuG.ChenJ. (2013b). Expression and characterization of extreme alkaline, oxidation-resistant keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis in recombinant Bacillus subtilis WB600 expression system and its application in wool fiber processing.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.29825–832. 10.1007/s11274-012-1237-5
93
LowryO. H.RosebroughN. J.FarrA. L.RandallR. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent.J. Biol. Chem.193265–275.
94
MacedoA. J. J.SilvaW. O. D. S. O. B.TermignoniC. (2008). Properties of a non collagen-degrading Bacillus subtilis keratinase.Can. J. Microbiol.54180–188.
95
MäkinenP. L.MäkinenK. K.SyedS. A. (1994). An endo-acting proline-specific oligopeptidase from Treponema denticola ATCC 35405: evidence of hydrolysis of human bioactive peptides.Infect. Immun.624938–4947.
96
MazottoA. M.CouriS.DamasoM. C. T.VermelhoA. B. (2013). Degradation of feather waste by Aspergillus niger keratinases: comparison of submerged and solid-state fermentation.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation85189–195. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.07.003
97
McKittrickJ.ChenP. Y.BoddeS. G.YangW.NovitskayaE. E.MeyersM. A. (2012). The structure, functions, and mechanical properties of keratin.JOM64449–468. 10.1007/s11837-012-0302-8
98
MercerD. K.StewartC. S. (2018). Keratin hydrolysis by dermatophytes.Med. Mycol.5713–22. 10.1093/mmy/myx160
99
MitsuikiS.IchikawaM.OkaT.SakaiM.MoriyamaY.SameshimaY.et al (2004). Molecular characterization of a keratinolytic enzyme from an alkaliphilic Nocardiopsis sp. TOA-1.Enzyme Microb. Technol.34482–489. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.12.011
100
MonodM. (2008). Secreted proteases from dermatophytes.Mycopathologia166:285. 10.1007/s11046-008-9105-4
101
MonodM.LéchenneB.JoussonO.GrandD.ZauggC.StöcklinR.et al (2005). Aminopeptidases and dipeptidyl-peptidases secreted by the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum.Microbiology151145–155. 10.1099/mic.0.27484-0
102
MoridshahiR.BahreiniM.SharifmoghaddamM.AsoodehA. (2020). Biochemical characterization of an alkaline surfactant-stable keratinase from a new keratinase producer, Bacillus zhangzhouensis.Extremophiles24693–704. 10.1007/s00792-020-01187-9
103
MuhammedN. S.HussinN.LimA. S.JonetM. A.MohamadS. E.JamaluddinH. (2021). Recombinant production and characterization of an extracellular subtilisin-like serine protease from Acinetobacter baumannii of fermented food origin.Protein J.1–17. 10.1007/s10930-021-09986-5
104
NasipuriP.HerschendJ.BrejnrodA. D.MadsenJ. S.EspersenR.SvenssonB.et al (2020). Community-intrinsic properties enhance keratin degradation from bacterial consortia.PLoS One15:e0228108. 10.1371/journal.pone.0228108
105
NavoneL.SpeightR. (2018). Understanding the dynamics of keratin weakening and hydrolysis by proteases.PLoS One13:e0202608. 10.1371/journal.pone.0202608
106
NnolimN. E.MpakaL.OkohA. I.NwodoU. U. (2020a). Biochemical and molecular characterization of a thermostable alkaline metallo-keratinase from Bacillus sp. Nnolim-K1.Microorganisms8:1304.
107
NnolimN. E.NwodoU. U. (2021). Microbial keratinase and the bio-economy: a three-decade meta-analysis of research exploit.AMB Express11:12. 10.1186/s13568-020-01155-8
108
NnolimN. E.OkohA. I.NwodoU. U. (2020b). Proteolytic bacteria isolated from agro-waste dumpsites produced keratinolytic enzymes.Biotechnol. Rep.27:e00483. 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00483
109
Omrane BenmradM.MechriS.Zaraî JaouadiN.Ben ElhoulM.RekikH.SayadiS.et al (2019). Purification and biochemical characterization of a novel thermostable protease from the oyster mushroom Pleurotus sajor-caju strain CTM10057 with industrial interest.BMC Biotechnol.19:43. 10.1186/s12896-019-0536-4
110
OnifadeA. A.Al-SaneN. A.Al-MusallamA. A.Al-ZarbanS. (1998). A review: potentials for biotechnological applications of keratin-degrading microorganisms and their enzymes for nutritional improvement of feathers and other keratins as livestock feed resources.Bioresour. Technol.661–11. 10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00033-9
111
Pahua-RamosM. E.Hernández-MelchorD. J.Camacho-PérezB.Quezada-CruzM. (2017). Degradation of chicken feathers: a review.Biotechnol. Ind. J.13658–666.
112
PapadopoulosM. C. (1989). Effect of processing on high-protein feedstuffs: a review.Biol. Wastes29123–138. 10.1016/0269-7483(89)90092-X
113
ParradoJ.Rodriguez-MorgadoB.TejadaM.HernandezT.GarciaC. (2014). Proteomic analysis of enzyme production by Bacillus licheniformis using different feather wastes as the sole fermentation media.Enzyme Microb. Technol.571–7. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.01.001
114
PengZ.MaoX.ZhangJ.DuG.ChenJ. (2019). Effective biodegradation of chicken feather waste by co-cultivation of keratinase producing strains.Microb. Cell Fact.18:84. 10.1186/s12934-019-1134-9
115
PengZ.ZhangJ.SongY.GuoR.DuG.ChenJ. (2021). Engineered pro-peptide enhances the catalytic activity of keratinase to improve the conversion ability of feather waste.Biotechnol. Bioeng.10.1002/bit.27771
116
PettettL. M.IpekK. (2004). Development of an environmentally friendly biofertilizer with keratin degrading and antibiotic producing actinomycetes.Actinomycetologica1834–42. 10.3209/saj.18_34
117
PinskiA.ZurJ.HasterokR.Hupert-KocurekK. (2020). Comparative genomics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Stenotrophomonas rhizophila revealed characteristic features of both species.Int. J. Mol. Sci.21:4922.
118
PrakashP.JayalakshmiS. K.SreeramuluK. (2010a). Production of keratinase by free and immobilized cells of Bacillus halodurans strain PPKS-2: partial characterization and its application in feather degradation and dehairing of the goat skin.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.1601909–1920. 10.1007/s12010-009-8702-0
119
PrakashP.JayalakshmiS. K.SreeramuluK. (2010b). Purification and characterization of extreme alkaline, thermostable keratinase, and keratin disulfide reductase produced by Bacillus halodurans PPKS-2.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.87625–633. 10.1007/s00253-010-2499-1
120
QiuJ.WilkensC.BarrettK.MeyerA. S. (2020). Microbial enzymes catalyzing keratin degradation: classification, structure, function.Biotechnol. Adv.44:107607. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107607
121
QuF.ChenQ.DingY.LiuZ.ZhaoY.ZhangX.et al (2018). Isolation of a feather-degrading strain of bacterium from spider gut and the purification and identification of its three key enzymes.Mol. Biol. Rep.451681–1689. 10.1007/s11033-018-4311-8
122
RahayuS.SyahD.Thenawidjaja SuhartonoM. (2012). Degradation of keratin by keratinase and disulfide reductase from Bacillus sp. MTS of Indonesian origin.Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.1152–158. 10.1016/j.bcab.2012.02.001
123
RaiS. K.KonwarhR.MukherjeeA. K. (2009). Purification, characterization and biotechnological application of an alkaline β-keratinase produced by Bacillus subtilis RM-01 in solid-state fermentation using chicken-feather as substrate.Biochem. Eng. J.45218–225. 10.1016/j.bej.2009.04.001
124
RaiS. K.MukherjeeA. K. (2011). Optimization of production of an oxidant and detergent-stable alkaline β-keratinase from Brevibacillus sp. strain AS-S10-II: application of enzyme in laundry detergent formulations and in leather industry.Biochem. Eng. J.5447–56. 10.1016/j.bej.2011.01.007
125
RamnaniP.SinghR.GuptaR. (2005). Keratinolytic potential of Bacillus licheniformis RG1: structural and biochemical mechanism of feather degradation.Can. J. Microbiol.51191–196. 10.1139/w04-123
126
ReisS. V. D.Beys-da-SilvaW. O.TirloniL.SantiL.SeixasA.TermignoniC.et al (2020). The extremophile Anoxybacillus sp. PC2 isolated from Brazilian semiarid region (Caatinga) produces a thermostable keratinase.J. Basic Microbiol.60809–815. 10.1002/jobm.202000186
127
RiffelA.LucasF.HeebP.BrandelliA. (2003). Characterization of a new keratinolytic bacterium that completely degrades native feather keratin.Arch. Microbiol.179258–265. 10.1007/s00203-003-0525-8
128
RozsM.ManczingerL.VágvölgyiC.KeveiF. (2001). Secretion of a trypsin-like thiol protease by a new keratinolytic strain of Bacillus licheniformis.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.205221–224. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10951.x
129
SahniN.SahotaP. P.GuptaP. U. (2015). Bacterial keratinases and their prospective applications: a review.Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci.4768–783.
130
SalaL.GautérioG. V.YounanF. F.BrandelliA.MoraesC. C.KalilS. J. (2014). Integration of ultrafiltration into an aqueous two-phase system in the keratinase purification.Process Biochem.492016–2024. 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.07.013
131
SangaliS.BrandelliA. (2000). Isolation and characterization of a novel feather-degrading bacterial strain.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.8717–24.
132
ShadziS.ChadeganipourM.AlimoradiM. (2002). Isolation of keratinophilic fungi from elementary schools and public parks in Isfahan, Iran.Mycoses45496–499. 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2002.00798.x
133
ShanmugasundaramO. L.Syed Zameer AhmedK.SujathaK.PonnmuruganP.SrivastavaA.RameshR.et al (2018). Fabrication and characterization of chicken feather keratin/polysaccharides blended polymer coated nonwoven dressing materials for wound healing applications.Mat. Sci. Eng. C9226–33. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.020
134
SharmaI.KangoN. (2021). Production and characterization of keratinase by Ochrobactrum intermedium for feather keratin utilization.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.1661046–1056. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.260
135
SharmaR.DeviS. (2018). Versatility and commercial status of microbial keratinases: a review.Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio Technol.1719–45. 10.1007/s11157-017-9454-x
136
SharmaS.GuptaA. (2016). Sustainable management of keratin waste biomass: applications and future perspectives.Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol.591–14.
137
SilveiraS. T.JaegerM. K.BrandelliA. (2009). Kinetic data and substrate specificity of a keratinase from Chryseobacterium sp. strain kr6.J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.84361–366. 10.1002/jctb.2048
138
SittipolD.RodpanS.AjingiY. S.LohnooT.LerksuthiratT.KumsangY.et al (2021). Identification, overexpression, purification, and biochemical characterization of a novel hyperthermostable keratinase from Geoglobus acetivorans.3 Biotech11:2. 10.1007/s13205-020-02538-1
139
SongJ.WangY.LiF.AkutsuT.RawlingsN. D.WebbG. I.et al (2018). iProt-Sub: a comprehensive package for accurately mapping and predicting protease-specific substrates and cleavage sites.Brief. Bioinform.20638–658. 10.1093/bib/bby028
140
SuC.GongJ.-S.SunY.-X.QinJ.ZhaiS.LiH.et al (2019). Combining pro-peptide engineering and multisite saturation mutagenesis to improve the catalytic potential of keratinase.ACS Synth. Biol.8425–433. 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00442x1
141
SyedD. G.LeeJ. C.LiW.-J.KimC.-J.AgasarD. (2009). Production, characterization and application of keratinase from Streptomyces gulbargensis.Bioresour. Technol.1001868–1871. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.047
142
TamreihaoK.MukherjeeS.KhunjamayumR.DeviL. J.AsemR. S.NingthoujamD. S. (2019). Feather degradation by keratinolytic bacteria and biofertilizing potential for sustainable agricultural production.J. Basic Microbiol.594–13. 10.1002/jobm.201800434
143
TatineniR.DoddapaneniK. K.PotumarthiR. C.MangamooriL. N. (2007). Optimization of keratinase production and enzyme activity using response surface methodology with streptomyces sp7.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.141:187. 10.1007/bf02729061
144
TeruoS.YumikoH.AkiK.ToyoyukiO.MegumiT.AyumiA.et al (2015). Structural characterization reveals the keratinolytic activity of an arthrobacter nicotinovorans protease.Protein Pept. Lett.2263–72. 10.2174/0929866521666140919100851
145
ThankaswamyS. R.SundaramoorthyS.PalanivelS.RamuduK. N. (2018). Improved microbial degradation of animal hair waste from leather industry using Brevibacterium luteolum (MTCC 5982).J. Clean. Prod.189701–708. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.095
146
TiwaryE.GuptaR. (2010a). Extracellular expression of keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis ER-15 in Escherichia coli.J. Agric. Food Chem.588380–8385. 10.1021/jf100803g
147
TiwaryE.GuptaR. (2010b). Medium optimization for a novel 58kDa dimeric keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis ER-15: biochemical characterization and application in feather degradation and dehairing of hides.Bioresour. Technol.1016103–6110. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.090
148
TorkS. E.ShaheinY. E.El-HakimA. E.Abdel-AtyA. M.AlyM. M. (2013). Production and characterization of thermostable metallo-keratinase from newly isolated Bacillus subtilis NRC 3.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.55169–175. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.01.002
149
TorkS. E.ShaheinY. E.El-HakimA. E.Abdel-AtyA. M.AlyM. M. (2016). Purification and partial characterization of serine-metallokeratinase from a newly isolated Bacillus pumilus NRC21.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.86189–196. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.060
150
VermaA.SinghH.AnwarS.ChattopadhyayA.TiwariK. K.KaurS.et al (2017). Microbial keratinases: industrial enzymes with waste management potential.Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.37476–491. 10.1080/07388551.2016.1185388
151
VidmarB.VodovnikM. (2018). Microbial keratinases: enzymes with promising biotechnological applications.Food Technol. Biotechnol.56312–328. 10.17113/ftb.56.03.18.5658
152
WangB.YangW.McKittrickJ.MeyersM. A. (2016). Keratin: structure, mechanical properties, occurrence in biological organisms, and efforts at bioinspiration.Progress Mater. Sci.76229–318. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.001
153
WangJ.-J.RojanatavornK.ShihJ. C. H. (2004). Increased production of Bacillus keratinase by chromosomal integration of multiple copies of the kerA gene.Biotechnol. Bioeng.87459–464. 10.1002/bit.20145
154
WangX. C.ZhaoH. Y.LiuG.ChengX. J.FengH. (2015). Improving production of extracellular proteases by random mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of a serine protease in Bacillus subtilis S1-4.Genet. Mol. Res.15:gmr.15027831. 10.4238/gmr.15027831
155
WuW.-L.ChenM.-Y.TuI. F.LinY.-C.EswarKumarN.ChenM.-Y.et al (2017). The discovery of novel heat-stable keratinases from Meiothermus taiwanensis WR-220 and other extremophiles.Sci. Rep.7:4658. 10.1038/s41598-017-04723-4
156
YahayaR. S. R.NormiY. M.PhangL. Y.AhmadS. A.AbdullahJ. O.SabriS. (2021). Molecular strategies to increase keratinase production in heterologous expression systems for industrial applications.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1053955–3969. 10.1007/s00253-021-11321-y
157
YamamuraS.MoritaY.HasanQ.YokoyamaK.TamiyaE. (2002). Keratin degradation: a cooperative action of two enzymes from Stenotrophomonas sp.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.2941138–1143. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00580-6
158
YongB.FeiX.ShaoH.XuP.HuY.NiW.et al (2020). Recombinant expression and biochemical characterization of a novel keratinase BsKER71 from feather degrading bacterium Bacillus subtilis S1-4.AMB Express10:9. 10.1186/s13568-019-0939-6
159
ZaghloulT. I.EmbabyA. M.ElmahdyA. R. (2011). Biodegradation of chicken feathers waste directed by Bacillus subtilis recombinant cells: scaling up in a laboratory scale fermentor.Bioresour. Technol.1022387–2393. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.106
160
Zaraî JaouadiN.RekikH.Ben ElhoulM.Zohra RahemF.Gorgi HilaC.Slimene Ben AichaH.et al (2015). A novel keratinase from Bacillus tequilensis strain Q7 with promising potential for the leather bating process.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.79952–964. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.038
161
ZengY.-H.ShenF.-T.TanC.-C.HuangC.-C.YoungC.-C. (2011). The flexibility of UV-inducible mutation in Deinococcus ficus as evidenced by the existence of the imuB–dnaE2 gene cassette and generation of superior feather degrading bacteria.Microbiol. Res.16740–47. 10.1016/j.micres.2011.02.008
162
ZhangM.JiangL.LiF.XuY.LvS.WangB. (2019). Simultaneous dermatophytosis and keratomycosis caused by Trichophyton interdigitale infection: a case report and literature review.BMC Infect. Dis.19:983. 10.1186/s12879-019-4612-0
163
ZhangR.-X.GongJ.-S.SuC.QinJ.LiH.LiH.et al (2020). Recombinant expression and molecular engineering of the keratinase from Brevibacillus parabrevis for dehairing performance.J. Biotechnol.32057–65. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.06.016
164
Zolfaghari EmamehR.KazokaiteJ.YakhchaliB. (2021). Bioinformatics analysis of extracellular subtilisin E from Bacillus subtilis.J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.1–8. 10.1080/07391102.2021.1894979
Summary
Keywords
keratinase, waste treatment, keratin, microorganisms, structure, protease
Citation
Li Q (2021) Structure, Application, and Biochemistry of Microbial Keratinases. Front. Microbiol. 12:674345. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.674345
Received
01 March 2021
Accepted
17 May 2021
Published
23 June 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Kian Mau Goh, University of Technology Malaysia, Malaysia
Reviewed by
Arun Gupta, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia; Bassem Jaouadi, Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Tunisia; Suman Kumar Halder, Vidyasagar University, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Qingxin Li, qingxin_li@outlook.com
This article was submitted to Microbiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.