Abstract
Identifying the enzymes involved in lignin degradation by bacteria is important in studying lignin valorization to produce renewable chemical products. In this paper, the catalytic oxidation of lignin by a novel multi-copper polyphenol oxidoreductase (OhLac) from the lignin degrader Ochrobactrum sp. J10 was explored. Following its expression, reconstitution, and purification, a recombinant enzyme OhLac was obtained. The OhLac enzyme was characterized kinetically against a range of substrates, including ABTS, guaiacol, and 2,6-DMP. Moreover, the effects of pH, temperature, and Cu2+ on OhLac activity and stability were determined. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) results indicated that the β-aryl ether lignin model compound guaiacylglycerol-β-guaiacyl ether (GGE) was oxidized by OhLac to generate guaiacol and vanillic acid. Molecular docking analysis of GGE and OhLac was then used to examine the significant amino residues and hydrogen bonding sites in the substrate–enzyme interaction. Altogether, we were able to investigate the mechanisms involved in lignin degradation. The breakdown of the lignocellulose materials wheat straw, corn stalk, and switchgrass by the recombinant OhLac was observed over 3 days, and the degradation results revealed that OhLac plays a key role in lignin degradation.
Introduction
The natural constituents of plant biomass are cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and so on. Among these, the aromatic heteropolymer lignin, which forms a natural physical barrier to the hydrolysis of cellulose, poses a great challenge in the utilization of lignocellulosic biomass (Yang and Lü, 2021). Many commercial chemical and physical methods aimed at lignin degradation are non-specific, energy consuming, and harmful to the environment. Biological methods involving microbial enzymes to oxidize and break down lignin structures have been studied extensively. Ligninolytic enzymes such as lignin peroxidases, manganese-dependent peroxidases, laccases, and dye-decolorizing peroxidases are effective in lignin degradation (Zhu et al., 2020; Kuppuraj et al., 2021).
The multi-copper oxidase group forming part of a large class of enzymes (Janusz et al., 2017), especially laccases (benzenediol: oxygen oxidoreducutases; EC 1.10.3.2), are known as one of the important enzymes of wood-destroying microorganisms. Notably, these enzymes can oxidize substrates by four redox-active copper ions as the cofactors and produce only water as a by-product; therefore, they are termed “green enzymes” (Riva, 2006). Laccases from fungi, bacteria, plants, and insects vary greatly in structure, molecular weight, or oligomeric state (Mayer and Staples, 2002; Navaneetha et al., 2011; Mate and Alcalde, 2015). Most characterization of fungi laccases has been conducted in Trametes versicolor and Pycnoporus cinnabarinus, where they have been shown to play important roles in lignin degradation (Youn et al., 1995; Eggert et al., 1997). Moreover, laccases have been shown to be abundant in bacteria, such as Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus licheniformis, and Escherichia coli, in which they are active against a wide range of substrates (Hullo et al., 2001; Xu et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2014). Traditional laccases were previously reported to consist of three structural domains and contained four copper ions in the active site: T1 Cu was responsible for the characteristic blue color and caused oxidation of substrate molecules by one-electron abstraction (Jones and Solomon, 2015); T2 Cu and a pair of T3 Cu formed a trinuclear cluster in which molecular oxygen was reduced to water (Mate and Alcalde, 2015).
Recently, laccases from bacteria that lack one of the three structural domains were identified and designated as “small laccases” because of their sequence similarity but smaller size compared with traditional laccases (Machczynski et al., 2004; Majumdar et al., 2014). Small laccases, such as SLAC from Streptomyces coelicolor and Ssl1 from Streptomyces sviceus, were extensively characterized and reported to be effective lignin-degrading enzymes (Gunne et al., 2014; Majumdar et al., 2014). Furthermore, these enzymes were demonstrated to have high oxidizing ability, thermal stability, and pH versatility. A novel polyphenol oxidase, P-PPO, with a lower molecular weight (33.4 kDa) was found and amplified from Paenibacillus sp., but unfortunately no activity was found with all the substrates tested against this enzyme (Granjatravez et al., 2018). Therefore, polyphenol oxidases from different kinds of bacteria require further investigation. In addition, detailed information about the lignin-degrading mechanism of these enzymes has rarely been studied using lignin model compounds and raw lignocellulosic biomass as substrates.
In the present study, a novel multi-copper polyphenol oxidoreductase, OhLac, was amplified and identified from the lignin-degrading bacteria Ochrobactrum sp. J10, which was isolated from rotten wood in Qinling, China, and reported in our previous study (Yang et al., 2017). The enzyme activity and biochemical characterization of OhLac were studied using a broad range of substrates. Furthermore, the lignin cleavage mechanism of OhLac was explored and assessed in the context of its lignin-degrading abilities.
Materials and Methods
Strains, Plasmids, and Reagents
The lignin-degrading bacteria Ochrobactrum sp. J10 (KX822680), which provided a source of lignin peroxidase, were isolated previously from rotten wood in Qinling Mountain, China (Yang et al., 2017). E. coli DH5α, BL21(DE3; TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd), and the plasmid pET-28a(+) (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) were used for cloning and expression experiments. The genomic DNA was extracted using an Ezup column bacteria genomic DNA purification kit (Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.). The Ni-NTA His Bind resin column (Novagen, Germany) was used to purify the enzyme. 2,2’-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; ABTS), guaiacol, 2,6-dimethoxyphenol (2,6-DMP), and [N,O-bis (trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide and (trimethylchlorosilane)] (BSTFA+TMCS) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). Guaiacylglycerol-β-guaiacyl ether (GGE; Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.), as the lignin model compound, was used to study the degradation mechanism of the enzyme.
Cloning, Overexpression, and Purification of Recombinant OhLac
The genomic DNA of Ochrobactrum sp. J10 was extracted using a genomic DNA purification kit after the cells were cultured and centrifuged. The gene encoding multi-copper polyphenol oxidoreductase from Ochrobactrum sp. J10 (OhLac) was amplified using primers, which were designed according to the gene sequence of the hypothetical laccase: ML11-F: 5′-CATGCCATGGGCATGAATACATATCACCCATTCAGTCTT-3′, ML11-R: 5′-AACGCTCGAGTGCCTCCTTCATTCCGATAA AG-3′ (the restriction sites NcoI and XhoI were underlined). The OhLac gene was cloned into an expression vector pET28a(+) and a recombinant engineered bacteria containing OhLac was constructed. Then, the recombinant enzyme was expressed with an N-terminal His6 fusion protein in E. coli BL21(DE3) after induction with 0.2 mM IPTG (Camarero et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2017). After cell collection and disruption, the cell lysates were loaded onto a Ni-NTA His Bind resin column and the recombinant OhLac protein was eluted with elution buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, and 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). SDS-PAGE was then performed to analyze the OhLac protein. Purified OhLac was dialyzed against 20 mM Tris–HCl at pH 8.0. The protein concentration was determined using the BCA method with bovine serum albumin as the standard (Ye et al., 2012; Bu et al., 2013).
Enzymatic Assays
All enzyme assays were carried out using a microplate reader (Victor X3, PerkinElmer, United States). The oxidation of ABTS, guaiacol, and 2,6-DMP was performed at 420 nm (ε420 = 36,000 M–1 cm–1), 470 nm (ε470 = 26,600 M–1 cm–1), and 468 nm (ε468 = 49,600 M–1 cm–1), respectively. One unit of enzyme activity (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 μmol of substrate per minute.
Effect of pH, Temperature, and Cu2+ on OhLac Activity and Stability
The optimum pH for OhLac activity was determined using ABTS, guaiacol, and 2,6-DMP as the substrates at different pH (2.0–12.0) at 30°C. Purified OhLac was incubated in 100 mM citric acid-disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 2.0–7.0), 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0–9.0), and 100 mM glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 10.0–12.0) to oxidize the substrates. The effect of temperature was determined by performing assays at temperatures ranging from 20 to 90°C at the optimum pH determined previously, ABTS (pH 3.0), guaiacol (pH 5.0), and 2,6-DMP (pH 5.0). The relative activity for each substrate was calculated considering the pH and temperature of maximum activity as 100%. To determine the enzyme stability at different pH values and temperatures, OhLac was incubated at every pH and temperature condition for 1 h, then the residual activity was measured. The enzyme activity at 0 h was defined as 100%. The effect of Cu2+ on OhLac activity was assayed by adding different concentrations of CuSO4 (0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.50, 5.00, 7.50, and 10.00 mM) into various substrate systems at the optimum pH and temperature (ABTS: pH 3.0, 50°C; guaiacol: pH 5.0, 40°C; 2,6-DMP: pH 5.0, 30°C).
Steady-State Kinetic Assays of OhLac
Steady-state kinetic parameters were measured by non-linear curve fitting to the obtained enzyme activities (using GraphPad Prism 5 software) and were fit according to the Michaelis–Menten equation (Rahmanpour and Bugg, 2015; Brissos et al., 2017; Sugawara et al., 2017). The catalytic constants (Vmax, Km, kcat, and kcat/Km) were determined by incubating OhLac with various concentrations of substrates, including ABTS (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 10.0, 15.0, and 20.0 mM), guaiacol (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.0 mM), and 2,6-DMP (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 mM). OhLac activity comparison was made with the commercial fungal laccase from T. versicolor (TvL; CAS: 80498-15-3) purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). The steady-state kinetic parameters were determined and calculated using ABTS, guaiacol, and 2,6-DMP as substrates at the optimum pH, temperature, and Cu2+ concentration (ABTS: pH 3.0, 50°C, Cu2+ 0.25 mM; guaiacol: pH 5.0, 40°C. Cu2+ 0.50 mM; 2,6-DMP: pH 5.0, 30°C, Cu2+ 5.00 mM).
Degradation of β-aryl Ether Lignin Model Compound by OhLac
The β-aryl ether dimer GGE was used as the lignin model compound to study the lignin-degrading mechanism of OhLac. The GGE was dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 10 mM. The enzymatic reaction systems consisted of 2 mM GGE, 0.1 mg/ml OhLac, 0.25 mM CuSO4, 1 mM ABTS, and 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer. The reactions were carried out at 40°C for 4 h. Then, the products of GGE degradation were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GCMS)-QP2010 Ultra (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). After extraction by ethyl acetate and derivatization by BSTFA+TMCS, the samples were injected into a GC-MS system to separate and analyze the compounds. The sample treatment method and operating parameters used were similar to those defined in our previous description (Yang et al., 2018).
Molecular Docking of the Protein Ligand
To provide deep insight into the binding of the enzyme OhLac and the substrate GGE, AutoDock 4.2, AutoGrid 4.2, and PyMOL were used to perform and set up docking calculations. The 3D structure of OhLac was predicted by I-TASSER. The structure file of GGE was prepared using ZINC database1 and AutoDock Tools. Polar hydrogen atoms were added, and the formats of the protein receptor and ligand were converted from PDB to PDBQT using AutoDock Tools. The docking of OhLac-GGE was carried out by AutoDock 4.2 with a Local Search Parameters algorithm method to define the docking site on protein target. The center of the docking box was set as the putative catalytic active center (75 × 56 × 61) in a grid with 40-Å spacing. The other parameters were set to the default values. The best conformation according to the scoring function was chosen as that with the lowest Gibbs energy after the docking search was completed. Each docking experiment was performed for 50 runs in per ligand structure; then, the best pose was saved. In addition, the interactions of OhLac-GGE, such as hydrogen bonds, were explored using PyMOL software (Lu et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2019).
Lignin Degradation of the Native Lignocellulose Material by OhLac
Three kinds of raw lignocellulosic materials (wheat straw, corn stalk, and switchgrass) were selected as the substrates for OhLac to degrade. After being crushed and passed through a 40-mesh sieve, the three materials were added at the ratio of 15% (w/v) to the enzymatic reactions, which consisted of 0.25 mM CuSO4, 1.0 mM ABTS, 1.0 mM H2O2, and 20 mg/ml OhLac (pH 6.0), respectively. The resulting solutions were incubated at 40°C for 3 days. The lignin degradation ratio was determined using the Klason lignin method described previously (Yang et al., 2018).
Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data analysis was performed by ANOVA and Duncan test using SPSS 16.0. In all analysis, p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Bioinformatic Analysis of OhLac in Ochrobactrum sp. J10
Ochrobactrum sp. J10 was revealed to exhibit potentially high lignin-degrading activity in our previous study (Yang et al., 2017). Following an NCBI search and PCR amplification, the gene OhLac, encoding the OhLac enzyme in Ochrobactrum sp. J10, was amplified from chromosomal DNA. Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of OhLac showed that it contained a single open reading frame of 837 bp, which encoded a protein monomer of 279 amino acids with a deduced theoretical pI of 5.98. The cloned enzyme was found to be a Multi-copper Polyphenol Oxidoreductase (IPR003730) after analysis of protein domain databases. The sequence of OhLac (Supplementary Figure 1) was used to perform a BLAST search in UniProt2, and the result showed that it was similar to the putative polyphenol oxidase YlmD (ID O31726) in Bacillus subtilis 168, with 98.92% sequence identity; however, there was no report of YlmD having lignin-degrading potential. The 3D structure of OhLac was modeled using Swiss-Model according to the obtained sequences (Figure 1). The structure of OhLac was identified with 48.33% identity with the template protein (PDB ID 1t8h.1.A) from Geobacillus stearothermophilus, including the central β-sheets and peripheral α-helices.
FIGURE 1
The transformation of OhLac was carried out successfully, and the expression of the OhLac enzyme followed induction by IPTG, which was added to the culture medium. The recombinant protein was purified using a Ni-NTA column, and the molecular weight of purified OhLac is shown in Figure 2. The protein content of crude extract was 281.90 mg/L. After purification, the protein content of purified OhLac was 76.20 mg/L. The OhLac had a specific activity of 177.03 U/mg when ABTS is used as the substrate. The recovery rate was 35.27% (in Supplementary Table 1).
FIGURE 2
Effects of pH, Temperature, and Cu2+ on OhLac Activity and Stability
The effects of pH, temperature, and Cu2+ on OhLac activity and stability were examined with different substrates, including ABTS, guaiacol, and 2,6-DMP.
As shown in Figure 3A, the enzyme activity of OhLac was determined at pH values ranging from 2.0 to 12.0 and these values were shown to have a great influence on the enzyme activity of the recombinant OhLac enzyme. Overall, the optimal pH range for OhLac activity was 3.0–5.0, which were acidic conditions. When the pH was greater than 7.0, the enzyme activity against all substrates reduced, and the optimal pH for enzyme activity was affected by the different substrates. With ABTS as the substrate, the optimum pH was 3.0. However, when the pH was 2.0, there was almost no enzyme activity with ABTS, whereas, when the pH was 4.0, the relative enzyme activity was reduced by half. The optimal pH was shown to be 5.0 using guaiacol and 2,6-DMP, both aromatic compounds, as substrates. According to the results of an enzyme activity assay at different pH values, the relative enzyme activity remained at 53.4% at pH 3.0 after 1 h with ABTS. However, the enzyme activity stability of OhLac when using guaiacol and 2,6-DMP (22.85 and 23.47%, respectively) was lower. The optimal pH of bacterial laccase has been reported to range from 3.0 to 9.0 (Prins et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020), varying according to the strains and substrates, while most fungal laccases are suitable for catalyzing under acidic conditions (Baldrian, 2006). The laccase OcCueO from Ochrobactrum sp., with a molecular weight of 55.1 kDa, exhibited maximum enzyme activity at pH 4.0 and 8.0 using ABTS as the substrate (Granjatravez et al., 2018).
FIGURE 3
Raising the reaction temperature is beneficial to increasing enzyme activity, but too high a temperature may cause the enzyme protein to denature and even lose activity. So, the effect of temperature on OhLac activity was studied, and the results are shown in Figure 3B. The enzyme activity of OhLac was shown to increase at first and then decrease with increasing temperature. Using the three substrates, the relative enzyme activity was higher at 30–60°C. When the temperature exceeded 70°C, the enzyme activity dropped sharply or activity was lost. According to reports, most laccases operate under an optimum catalytic temperature of 40–70°C. However, some laccases from thermophilic microorganisms (such as Thermus thermophilus and Trametes pubescens) can withstand a temperature of 90°C (Singh et al., 2009; Zheng et al., 2012; Jing et al., 2013).
Different concentrations of Cu2+ were added to detect the impact of Cu2+ on the enzyme activity of OhLac. As shown in Figure 3C, with an increasing Cu2+ concentration, the relative enzyme activity increased first and then decreased. Interestingly, it was found that there was a certain amount of enzyme activity observed when CuSO4 was not added (0.00 mM), which indicated that the recombinant enzyme OhLac was not Cu2+-dependent. Similarly, it was reported that OcCueO, a laccase from Ochrobactrum sp., showed enzyme activity without the addition of Cu2+ (Granjatravez et al., 2018). In this study, compared with the control sample without Cu2+, the samples containing significant concentrations of Cu2+ showed higher activity. For example, OhLac activity increased by about 10% with the addition of 0.25 mM CuSO4 using ABTS as the substrate, but when the concentration of CuSO4 was more than 0.25 mM, the enzyme activity decreased by about 40%, which was significant. It was therefore suggested that the excess Cu2+ might inhibit the enzyme activity of OhLac. Similarly, when guaiacol and 2,6-DMP were used as the substrates, the optimum concentrations of CuSO4 added were 0.50 and 5.00 mM, respectively.
Kinetic Characterization of OhLac
To characterize the catalytic specificity of recombinant OhLac, three substrates were tested, including ABTS, guaiacol, and 2,6-DMP, using UV-visible spectrophotometric assays. The results showed (in Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 2) that OhLac was active with all substrates. The steady-state kinetic parameters of other multi-copper polyphenol oxidoreductases reported are summarized in Table 2. In comparison, the Vmax value of OhLac was about 60 U/mg, which was much higher than that of other similar enzymes. Moreover, OhLac exhibited kcat values of 20–35 s–1 for three substrates, but a lower Km of (523.18 ± 9.20) μM for guaiacol, giving a kcat/Km value of 6.47 × 104 M–1 s–1 for this substrate. Interestingly, the kcat/Km value of OhLac was lower than that of CotAs with higher Mw (about 65 kDa) from Bacillus sp. (Koschorreck et al., 2008; Li et al., 2018), but the specificity of OhLac was much higher than most other multi-copper oxidoreductases, especially a smaller laccase with a similar Mw (about 32 kDa) from Streptomyces sp. In addition, the activity of OhLac was compared with that of the commercially available fungal laccase from Trametes versicolor (TvL). As shown in Figure 4, the specific activity of OhLac toward ABTS was 76.61% of that measured for TvL. However, the specific activity of OhLac was three- to eight-fold higher than that of TvL when the aromatic compounds, guaiacol and 2,6-DMP, were used as substrates.
TABLE 1
| Substrates | Vmax (U/mg) | Km (μM) | kcat (s–1) | kcat/Km (M–1 s–1) |
| ABTS | 68.49 ± 6.85 | 1,061.64 ± 9.78 | 35.02 ± 3.26 | 3.30 × 104 |
| Guaiacol | 66.23 ± 5.76 | 523.18 ± 9.20 | 33.86 ± 5.59 | 6.47 × 104 |
| 2,6-DMP | 41.67 ± 5.41 | 1,125.01 ± 5.12 | 21.30 ± 3.11 | 1.89 × 104 |
The kinetic parameters of recombinant OhLac.
The data were presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
TABLE 2
| Enzyme | Species | Mw (kDa) | ABTS | 2,6-DMP | References | |||||||
| Vmax (U/mg) | Km (μM) | kcat (s–1) | kcat/Km (M–1 s–1) | Vmax (U/mg) | Km (μM) | kcat (s–1) | kcat/Km (M–1 s–1) | |||||
| OhLac | Ochrobactrum sp. J10 | 31 | 68.49 ± 6.85 | 1,061.64 ± 9.78 | 35.02 ± 3.26 | 3.30 × 104 | 41.67 ± 5.41 | 1,125.01 ± 5.12 | 21.30 ± 3.11 | 1.89 × 104 | This paper | |
| CcCueO | Ochrobactrum sp. | 55.1 | 1 | 1,463 | 0.93 | 635.80 | 0.90 | 0.31 | 0.90 | 2,929.90 | Granjatravez et al., 2018 | |
| CotA | Bacillus subtilis | 65 | – | 104 ± 5 | 26.80 ± 2.00 | 2.60 × 105 | – | – | – | – | Li et al., 2018 | |
| CotA | Bacillus altitudinis SYBC hb4 | 58.9 | 51.45 | 88 | 50.30 | 5.70 × 105 | – | – | – | – | Zhang et al., 2016 | |
| CotA | Bacillus licheniformis | 65 | – | 6.50 ± 0.20 | 83 | – | – | 56.70 ± 1.00 | 28 | – | Koschorreck et al., 2008 | |
| LMCOs | Bacillus coagulans | 59.7 | – | 31 | 69 ± 3.10 | – | – | 0.63 | 17 ± 0.80 | – | Ihssen et al., 2015 | |
| LMCOs | Bacillus clausii | 58.4 | – | 132 | 90 ± 2.30 | – | – | 8.54 | 65 ± 15.20 | – | Ihssen et al., 2015 | |
| LCC3 | Trametes trogii BAFC 463 | 58 | – | 250 ± 9 | 399 ± 20 seg–1 | – | – | 2,095 ± 63 | 329 ± 32 seg–1 | – | Campos et al., 2016 | |
| Lac21 | Ahrensia sp. R2A130 | 50 | NA | NA | NA | NA | – | 216 | 17.83 | 8.25 × 104 | Fang et al., 2012 | |
| P-PPO | Paenibacillus sp. | 33.4 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Granjatravez et al., 2018 | |
| TtSLAC | Thermus thermophilus HJ6 | 26.3 | – | 490 | 1.48 | 3.02 × 103 | – | 110 | 2.93 | 2.66 × 104 | Kim et al., 2015 | |
| Ssl1 | Streptomyces sviceus | 35.8 | – | – | – | – | – | 890 | 0.32 | 361.42 | Gunne et al., 2014 | |
| SLAC | Streptomyces coelicolor (SCO6712) | 32.7 | – | (0.80 ± 0.10) × 103 | 7.70 ± 0.30 | (10 ± 1) × 103 | – | – | (1.10 ± 0.20) × 103 | 4.00 ± 0.20 | (3.50 ± 0.60) × 103 | Sherif et al., 2013 |
| SLAC | Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) | 35.5 | 3.10 ± 0.03 | (5.89 ± 1.69) × 103 | 9.50 ± 1.43 | (1.61 ± 0.44) × 103 | 7.07 ± 0.32 | (5.09 ± 1.34) × 103 | 8.22 ± 1.03 | (1.62 ± 0.39) × 103 | Prins et al., 2015 | |
| SLAC | Streptomyces coelicolor | 37.7 | – | – | – | – | – | 2,850 | 0.87 | 3.05 × 102 | Toscano et al., 2013 | |
| Ssl1 | Streptomyces sviceus | 32.5 | – | 360 | 7.38 | 2.05 × 104 | – | 890 | 0.32 | – | Gunne and Urlacher, 2012 | |
| SvSL | Streptomyces viridochromogenes | 39 | – | (0.30 ± 0.01) × 103 | 8.00 ± 0.15 | 2.66 × 104 | – | (4.50 ± 0.30) × 103 | 1.90 ± 0.12 | 420 | Trubitsina et al., 2015 | |
The review of steady-state kinetic parameters of multi-copper polyphenol oxidoreductases.
NA: no activity observed.
–: not determined.
FIGURE 4
Oxidation of β-aryl Ether Lignin Model Compound by OhLac
Guaiacylglycerol-β-guaiacyl ether was used to study the action of lignin-oxidizing enzymes. To explore the cleavage of lignin substrates, the reaction products of GGE degraded by OhLac were determined using GC-MS. The ABTS was added as a mediator and the results are shown in Figure 5. Using the NIST library, some of the aromatic compounds, aldehydes, and acids were analyzed according to their ion chromatogram results. In particular, guaiacol (RT = 12.650 min) and vanillic acid (RT = 20.342 min), aromatic monomer compounds, were identified as reaction products.
FIGURE 5
The Analysis of Enzyme–Substrate Interactions and Prediction of Binding Sites
Studies of small-molecule compounds docking in the binding sites of receptors revealing the interactions in the complexes are important to analyzing the catalytic sites of the enzyme–substrates. The results from the analysis of OhLac-GGE docking at the lowest binding energy are shown in Figure 6A. Seven amino residues in OhLac, namely, GLU131, GLY133, THR134, VAL138, ASP185, ASN186, and GLU187, interacted with the substrate GGE directly, which indicated that these seven amino residues could be very significant sites in the catalytic process. Hydrogen bonding between OhLac and GGE was analyzed using PyMOL, and the results are shown in Figure 6B.
FIGURE 6
Oxidation and Degradation of Raw Lignocellulose Materials by OhLac
To verify the oxidation activity of the recombinant OhLac against native lignin, powdered lignocellulose materials, including switchgrass, corn stalk, and wheat straw, were used. Moreover, the visible changes in the native materials were observed. The results of degradation by OhLac for 24 h are shown in Figure 7A. Following treatment, the appearance of the raw materials had changed significantly. For example, the particle size of the lignocellulosic material was reduced, and the surface changed from smooth to fluffy, causing some of the particles to float on the surface of degradation liquid. Simultaneously, compared with that of the control samples, the enzymatic hydrolysate was darkened and yellowish-brown after the degradation. These results might be due to the dissolution of internal substances, such as proteins, pigments, polysaccharides, or others, after the structural depolymerization of the raw materials by OhLac. The above phenomena were confirmed by the determination of the lignin degradation rate and weight loss rate (Figure 7B). After 3 days of degradation, the weight loss rate for the three materials was 10–15%. The lignin degradation rate was highest for switchgrass (∼6.20%), followed by corn stalk (5.2%), and wheat straw was the worst (4.30%). Different kinds of plant biomass exhibit differences in their structural composition and properties, such as the content of β-O-4 bonds, methoxy content, or condensation, which leads to a difference in degradation rates (Mann et al., 2009; Santos et al., 2012).
FIGURE 7
Discussion
The polyphenol oxidoreductase OhLac from Ochrobactrum sp. J10 was demonstrated to be a potential lignin-degrading enzyme. The results of the kinetic characterization indicated that OhLac might show better activity and potential for certain lignin-degrading applications. It was well known that the traditional fungal and bacterial laccases contained three domains and four copper atoms in their active center, whose molecular weights were about 60 kDa, such as CotA (Koschorreck et al., 2008). In addition, another form of the polyphenol oxidoreductase was found with two domains (about 30 kDa) in bacteria or called “small laccases” (Majumdar et al., 2014). The property of small laccases was reported to be markedly different from that of traditional laccases. It had been proved that they had activities against a wide range of phenolic compounds (Prins et al., 2015). Besides, they had the advantages of high oxidizing power, thermal stability, and pH versatility (Lee et al., 2019). However, more detailed biochemical and structural studies of various smaller size laccases should be conducted and explored deeply to promote their application to lignin degradation.
Guaiacylglycerol-β-guaiacyl ether is a typical phenolic model compound containing the β-O-4 bond. It has been reported that the intersubunit content of β-O-4 bonds is more than 50% in lignin (Villaverde et al., 2009). These peaks (guaiacol and vanillic acid) appeared to correspond to the Cα-Cβ oxidative products of GGE when degraded by OhLac. Similarly, OcCueO has been reported to decompose lignosulfonate to form vanillin acid as a product, which indicates cleavage of the Cα-Cβ bond in lignin (Granjatravez et al., 2018). The small laccases from Streptomyces (SCLAC) were studied to investigate the degradation of the phenolic β-O-4 lignin model compound (LM-OH), and vanillin was identified as a degradation product because of Cα-Cβ bond cleavage. SCLAC could oxidize the non-phenolic β-O-4 lignin model compound (LM-OMe) to form the corresponding ketone product (Majumdar et al., 2014). We found that there was a hydrogen bond between the substrate GGE and the amino acid THR134 of OhLac. Specifically, the THR134 residue could form a hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl group attached to the Cα position in GGE, which might offer atoms as hydrogen bond donors and acceptors (Yang et al., 2015). The results indicated that these amino residues were very important putative catalytic sites. The contribution of every active site to enzyme activity will be explored in future work.
The above results from the studies of degradation and docking of lignin model compounds indicated that OhLac was available to oxidize lignin. Therefore, lignin cleavage by some bacteria might be related to the action of multicopper oxidases. Laccase may only be responsible for the radical initiation step, while the downstream Cα-Cβ bond cleavage may be the result of spontaneous reaction (Leonowicz et al., 2001; Majumdar et al., 2014). The oxidation of the lignin model compound by a fungal laccase led to the formation of the corresponding ketone product instead of Cα-Cβ bond cleavage (Li et al., 1999). Laccases catalyze oxidation of lignin, initially producing a phenoxy radical (Perna et al., 2019). It had often been reported that Cα-oxidation, rather than ether bond cleavage, was the main result of laccase-catalyzed lignin degradation system (Heap et al., 2014; Hilgers et al., 2019). A non-phenolic lignin model, veratrylglycerol-β-guaiacyl ether (VBG), was used to explore the degradation of lignin by a laccase/HBT system. The results showed that the Cα-ketone analog of VBG (VBGox) and two ether cleavage products were identified, which indicated Cα-oxidation cleavage (Hilgers et al., 2020). In this study, a mixture of oxidative degradation products was formed, which were not fully characterized. However, the products were identified and characterized as guaiacol and vanillic acid. Therefore, it was supposed that during the oxidation of lignin by OhLac, oxidation of the α-carbon center leads to the formation of the ketone product, and then continued oxidation causes the cleavage of the Cα-Cβ bond of lignin (Figure 8). OhLac is thought to breakdown dimeric lignin GGE by cleaving the Cα-Cβ bond and to produce guaiacol (L2) and vanillic acid (L3).
FIGURE 8
Conclusion
In this paper, a novel bacterial multicopper oxidase, OhLac, from Ochrobactrum sp. J10 was identified and characterized. After heterologous expression and purification, we noted that OhLac differed from other multicopper oxidases reported previously. In particular, it had a lower molecular weight and two structural domains. Notably, the results proved that this small multicopper oxidase has the potential to be useful in the oxidation and degradation of lignin, playing a key role in the process. Moreover, the cleavage of the β-O-4 linkage in lignin was explored and discussed as part of the oxidative process. Improved knowledge of bacterial enzymes and their roles in lignin degradation will have a significant impact on a wide array of biotechnologies focused on lignin degradation.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
CY, LM, XW, and XL conceived and designed the project. CY participated in the majority of experiments, drafted the manuscript and all authors participated in the data analysis and revision of manuscript. LM cloned and expressed the genes. CY and YX completed the purification of recombinant protein. CY, XW, and XL performed the analysis of degradation mechanism. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation and they all read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Starting Foundation Project for High-level Talents of Henan University of Technology (No. 2019BS029) and the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (Grant No. 201503135).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.694166/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
- OhLac
the multi-copper polyphenol oxidoreductase from lignin degrader Ochrobactrum sp. J10
- ABTS
2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
- 2,6-DMP
2,6-dimethoxyphenol
- GGE
guaiacylglycerol- β-guaiacyl ether
- MCOs
multi-copper oxidase
- TvL
fungal laccase from Trametes versicolor
- BSTFA+TMCS
N,O-bis (trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide and (trimethylchlorosilane).
References
1
BaldrianP. (2006). Fungal laccases-occurrence and properties.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.30215–242. 10.1111/j.1574-4976.2005.00010.x
2
BrissosV.TavaresD.SousaA. C.RobaloM. P.MartinsL. O. (2017). Engineering a bacterial dyp-type peroxidase for enhanced oxidation of lignin-related phenolics at alkaline pH.ACS Catal.73454–3465. 10.1021/acscatal.6b03331
3
BuD.ZhouY.TangJ.JingF.ZhangW. (2013). Expression and purification of a novel therapeutic single-chain variable fragment antibody against BNP from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli.Protein Expr. Purif.92203–207. 10.1016/j.pep.2013.10.002
4
CamareroS.IbarraD.MartinezM. J.MartinezA. T. (2005). Lignin-derived compounds as efficient laccase mediators for decolorization of different types of recalcitrant dyes.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.711775–1784. 10.1128/aem.71.4.1775-1784.2005
5
CamposP. A.LevinL. N.WirthS. A. (2016). Heterologous production, characterization and dye decolorization ability of a novel thermostable laccase isoenzyme from Trametes trogii BAFC 463.Process Biochem.51895–903.
6
ChangY. C.ChoiD.TakamizawaK.KikuchiS. (2014). Isolation of Bacillus sp. strains capable of decomposing alkali lignin and their application in combination with lactic acid bacteria for enhancing cellulase performance.Bioresour. Technol.152429–436. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.032
7
EggertC.TempU.ErikssonK. E. (1997). Laccase is essential for lignin degradation by the white-rot fungus Pycnoporus cinnabarinus.FEBS Lett.40789–92. 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00301-3
8
FangZ. M.LiT. L.ChangF.ZhouP.FangW.HongY. Z.et al (2012). A new marine bacterial laccase with chloride-enhancing, alkaline-dependent activity and dye decolorization ability.Bioresour. Technol.11136–41. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.172
9
GranjatravezR. S.WilkinsonR. C.FelixG. P.SquinaF. M.FülöpV.BuggT. (2018). Structural and functional characterisation of multi-copper oxidase CueO from lignin-degrading bacterium Ochrobactrum sp. reveal its activity towards lignin model compounds and lignosulfonate.FEBS J.2851684–1700. 10.1111/febs.14437
10
GunneM.HoppnerA.HagedoornP. L.UrlacherV. B. (2014). Structural and redox properties of the small laccase Ssl1 from Streptomyces sviceus.FEBS J.2814307–4318. 10.1111/febs.12755
11
GunneM.UrlacherV. B. (2012). Characterization of the alkaline laccase Ssl1 from Streptomyces sviceus with unusual properties discovered by genome mining.PloS One.7:e52360–e52368. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052360
12
HeapL.GreenA.BrownD.van DongenB.TurnerN. (2014). Role of laccase as an enzymatic pretreatment method to improve lignocellulosic saccharification.Catal. Sci. Technol.42251–2259. 10.1039/c4cy00046c
13
HilgersR.Twentyman-JonesM.Van DamA.GruppenH.ZuilhofH.KabelM. A.et al (2019). The impact of lignin sulfonation on its reactivity with laccase and laccase/HBT.Catal. Sci. Technol.91535–1542. 10.1039/c9cy00249a
14
HilgersR.Van DamA.ZuilhofH.VinckenJ.-P.KabelM. A. (2020). Controlling the competition: boosting laccase/HBT-catalyzed cleavage of a β-O-4’ linked lignin model.ACS Catal.108650–8659. 10.1021/acscatal.0c02154
15
HulloM.-F.MoszerI.DanchinA.Martin-VerstraeteI. (2001). CotA of Bacillus subtilis is a copper-dependent laccase.J. Bacteriol.1835426–5430. 10.1128/jb.183.18.5426-5430.2001
16
IhssenJ.ReissR.LuchsingerR.Thöny-MeyerL.RichterM. (2015). Biochemical properties and yields of diverse bacterial laccase-like multicopper oxidases expressed in Escherichia coli.Sci. Rep.51–13.
17
JanuszG.PawlikA.SulejJ.Swiderska-BurekU.Jarosz-WilkolazkaA.PaszczynskiA. (2017). Lignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.41941–962.
18
JingS.FengP.CuiB. (2013). Purification, biochemical characterization and dye decolorization capacity of an alkali-resistant and metal-tolerant laccase from Trametes pubescens.Bioresour. Technol.12849–57. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.085
19
JonesS. M.SolomonE. I. (2015). Electron transfer and reaction mechanism of laccases.Cell Mol. Life Sci.72869–883. 10.1007/s00018-014-1826-6
20
KimH. W.LeeS. Y.ParkH.JeonS. J. (2015). Expression, refolding, and characterization of a small laccase from Thermus thermophilus HJ6.Protein Expr. Purif.11437–43. 10.1016/j.pep.2015.06.004
21
KoschorreckK.RichterS. M.EneA. B.RodunerE.SchmidR. D.UrlacherV. B. (2008). Cloning and characterization of a new laccase from Bacillus licheniformis catalyzing dimerization of phenolic acids.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.79217–224. 10.1007/s00253-008-1417-2
22
KuppurajS. P.VenkidasamyB.SelvarajD.RamalingamS. (2021). Comprehensive in silico and gene expression profiles of MnP family genes in Phanerochaete chrysosporium towards lignin biodegradation.Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.157:105143. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105143
23
LeeS.KangM.BaeJ. H.SohnJ. H.SungB. H. (2019). Bacterial valorization of lignin: strains, enzymes, conversion pathways, biosensors, and perspectives.Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.7:209. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00209
24
LeonowiczA.ChoN.LuterekJ.WilkolazkaA.Wojtas-WasilewskaM.MatuszewskaA.et al (2001). Fungal laccase: properties and activity on lignin.J. Basic Microbiol.41185–227.
25
LiK.XuF.ErikssonK. E. L. (1999). Comparison of fungal laccases and redox mediators in oxidation of a nonphenolic lignin model compound.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.652654–2660. 10.1128/aem.65.6.2654-2660.1999
26
LiL.XieT.LiuZ.FengH.WangG. (2018). Activity enhancement of CotA laccase by hydrophilic engineering, histidine tag optimization and static culture.Protein Eng. Des. Sel.311–5. 10.1093/protein/gzx064
27
LiuY.LuoG.NgoH. H.GuoW.ZhangS. (2020). Advances in thermostable laccase and its current application in lignin-first biorefinery: a review.Bioresour. Technol.298:122511. 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122511
28
LuX.WangC.LiX.ZhaoJ.ZhaoX. (2017). Studying nonproductive adsorption ability and binding approach of cellobiohydrolase to lignin during bioconversion of lignocellulose.Energy Fuels3114393–14400. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02427
29
MachczynskiM. C.VijgenboomE.SamynB.CantersG. W. (2004). Characterization of SLAC: a small laccase from Streptomyces coelicolor with unprecedented activity.Protein Sci.132388–2397. 10.1110/ps.04759104
30
MajumdarS.LukkT.SolbiatiJ. O.BauerS.NairS. K.CronanJ. E.et al (2014). Roles of small laccases from Streptomyces in lignin degradation.Biochemistry534047–4058. 10.1021/bi500285t
31
MannD. G. J.LabbéN.SykesR. W.GracomK.KlineL.SwamidossI. M.et al (2009). Rapid assessment of lignin content and structure in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) grown under different environmental conditions.Bioenergy Res.2246–256. 10.1007/s12155-009-9054-x
32
MateD. M.AlcaldeM. (2015). Laccase engineering: from rational design to directed evolution.Biotechnol. Adv.3325–40. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.007
33
MayerA. M.StaplesR. C. (2002). Laccase: new functions for an old enzyme.Phytochemistry60551–565. 10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00171-1
34
NavaneethaS.VivancoJ. M.DeckerS. R.ReardonK. F. (2011). Expression of industrially relevant laccases: prokaryotic style.Trends Biotechnol.29480–489. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.04.005
35
PernaV.MeyerA. S.HolckJ.EltisL. D.EijsinkV. G.Wittrup AggerJ. (2019). Laccase-catalyzed oxidation of lignin induces production of H2O2.ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.8831–841. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04912
36
PrinsA.KleinsmidtL.KhanN.KirbyB.KudangaT.VollmerJ.et al (2015). The effect of mutations near the T1 copper site on the biochemical characteristics of the small laccase from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2).Enzyme Microb. Technol.6823–32. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.10.003
37
RahmanpourR.BuggT. D. (2015). Characterisation of Dyp-type peroxidases from Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5: oxidation of Mn (II) and polymeric lignin by Dyp1B.Arch. Biochem. Biophys.57493–98. 10.1016/j.abb.2014.12.022
38
RivaS. (2006). Laccases: blue enzymes for green chemistry.Trends Biotechnol.24219–226. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.03.006
39
SantosR. B.CapanemaE. A.BalakshinM. Y.ChangH.JameelH. (2012). Lignin structural variation in hardwood species.J. Agric. Food Chem.604923–4930. 10.1021/jf301276a
40
SherifM.WaungD.KorbeciB.MavisakalyanV.FlickR.BrownG.et al (2013). Biochemical studies of the multicopper oxidase (small laccase) from Streptomyces coelicolor using bioactive phytochemicals and site-directed mutagenesis.Microb. Biotechnol.6588–597. 10.1111/1751-7915.12068
41
SinghG.SharmaP.CapalashN. (2009). Performance of an alkalophilic and halotolerant laccase from gamma-proteobacterium JB in the presence of industrial pollutants.J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.55283–289. 10.2323/jgam.55.283
42
SugawaraK.NishihashiY.NariokaT.YoshidaT.MoritaM.SuganoY. (2017). Characterization of a novel DyP-type peroxidase from Streptomyces avermitilis.J. Biosci. Bioeng.123425–430. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.12.001
43
ToscanoM. D.De MariaL.LobedanzS.OstergaardL. H. (2013). Optimization of a small laccase by active-site redesign.Chembiochem141209–1211. 10.1002/cbic.201300256
44
TrubitsinaL. I.TishchenkoS. V.GabdulkhakovA. G.LisovA. V.ZakharovaM. V.LeontievskyA. A. (2015). Structural and functional characterization of two-domain laccase from Streptomyces viridochromogenes.Biochimie112151–159. 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.005
45
VillaverdeJ. J.LiJ.EkM.LigeroP.VegaA. D. (2009). Native lignin structure of miscanthus x giganteus and its changes during acetic and formic acid fractionation.J. Agric. Food Chem.576262–6270. 10.1021/jf900483t
46
XieF.ZhangW.GongS.GuX.LanX.WuJ.et al (2019). Investigating lignin from Canna edulis ker residues induced activation of alpha-amylase: kinetics, interaction, and molecular docking.Food Chem.27162–69. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.153
47
XuL.WeiZ.MinZ.PengX.YuG.TengM.et al (2007). Crystal structures of E. coli laccase CueO at different copper concentrations.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.35421–26. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.116
48
YangC.LüX. (2021). Composition of plant biomass and its impact on pretreatment in Advances in 2nd Generation of Bioethanol Production.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 71–85.
49
YangC.YueF.CuiY.XuY.ShanY.LiuB.et al (2018). Biodegradation of lignin by Pseudomonas sp. Q18 and the characterization of a novel bacterial DyP-type peroxidase.J. Appl. Microbiol.45913–927. 10.1007/s10295-018-2064-y
50
YangC. X.WangT.GaoL. N.YinH. J.LuX. (2017). Isolation, identification and characterization of lignin-degrading bacteria from Qinling.China J. Appl. Microbiol.1231447–1460. 10.1111/jam.13562
51
YangX.GuC.LinY. (2020). A novel fungal laccase from Sordaria macrospora k-hell: expression, characterization, and application for lignin degradation.Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.431133–1139. 10.1007/s00449-020-02309-5
52
YangY.ZhangX.YinQ.FangW.FangZ.WangX.et al (2015). A mechanism of glucose tolerance and stimulation of GH1 β-glucosidases.Sci. Rep.51–12.
53
YeW.LiuJ.WangH.WangJ.WangX. (2012). Cloning, expression, purification, and characterization of a glutamate-specific endopeptidase from Bacillus licheniformis.Protein Expr. Purif.82138–143. 10.1016/j.pep.2011.12.001
54
YounH. D.HahY. C.KangS. O. (1995). Role of laccase in lignin degradation by white-rot fungi.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.132183–188. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07831.x
55
ZhangY.LiX.HaoZ.XiR.CaiY.LiaoX. (2016). Hydrogen peroxide-resistant CotA and YjqC of Bacillus altitudinis spores are a promising biocatalyst for catalyzing reduction of sinapic acid and sinapine in rapeseed meal.PloS One.11:158351. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158351
56
ZhengZ.LiH.LiL.ShaoW. (2012). Biobleaching of wheat straw pulp with recombinant laccase from the hyperthermophilic Thermus thermophilus.Biotechnol. Lett.34541–547. 10.1007/s10529-011-0796-0
57
ZhuD.LiangN.ZhangR.AhmadF.SunJ. (2020). Insight into depolymerization mechanism of bacterial laccase for lignin.ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.812920–12933. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03457
Summary
Keywords
lignin degradation, multi-copper polyphenol oxidoreductase, characterization, enzyme, cleavage mechanism
Citation
Yang C, Ma L, Wang X, Xing Y and Lü X (2021) A Novel Polyphenol Oxidoreductase OhLac from Ochrobactrum sp. J10 for Lignin Degradation. Front. Microbiol. 12:694166. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.694166
Received
12 April 2021
Accepted
26 August 2021
Published
04 October 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Rahul Singh, Genome British Columbia, Canada
Reviewed by
Ram Naresh Bharagava, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India; Valentina Kratasyuk, Siberian Federal University, Russia; Eugene Kuatsjah, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DOE), United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Yang, Ma, Wang, Xing and Lü.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xin Lü, xinlu@nwsuaf.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Microbial Physiology and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.