Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus invasion of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network (OLCN) is a novel mechanism of bacterial persistence and immune evasion in chronic osteomyelitis. Previous work highlighted S. aureus cell wall transpeptidase, penicillin binding protein 4 (PBP4), and surface adhesin, S. aureus surface protein C (SasC), as critical factors for bacterial deformation and propagation through nanopores in vitro, representative of the confined canaliculi in vivo. Given these findings, we hypothesized that cell wall synthesis machinery and surface adhesins enable durotaxis- and haptotaxis-guided invasion of the OLCN, respectively. Here, we investigated select S. aureus cell wall synthesis mutants (Δpbp3, Δatl, and ΔmreC) and surface adhesin mutants (ΔclfA and ΔsasC) for nanopore propagation in vitro and osteomyelitis pathogenesis in vivo. In vitro evaluation in the microfluidic silicon membrane-canalicular array (μSiM-CA) showed pbp3, atl, clfA, and sasC deletion reduced nanopore propagation. Using a murine model for implant-associated osteomyelitis, S. aureus cell wall synthesis proteins were found to be key modulators of S. aureus osteomyelitis pathogenesis, while surface adhesins had minimal effects. Specifically, deletion of pbp3 and atl decreased septic implant loosening and S. aureus abscess formation in the medullary cavity, while deletion of surface adhesins showed no significant differences. Further, peri-implant osteolysis, osteoclast activity, and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) production were decreased following pbp3 deletion. Most notably, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging of infected bone showed that pbp3 was the only gene herein associated with decreased submicron invasion of canaliculi in vivo. Together, these results demonstrate that S. aureus cell wall synthesis enzymes are critical for OLCN invasion and osteomyelitis pathogenesis in vivo.
Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous organism of the human microbiota colonizing the nares of approximately 30% of individuals (). Despite its ability to asymptomatically colonize a large percentage of the population, S. aureus can also cause severe disease as an opportunistic pathogen (). In the setting of implant-associated bone infection, S. aureus has evolved to express various virulence mechanisms that enhance its survival and ability to evade host immunity.
While many pathogens have been reported to cause prosthetic joint infections (), clinically S. aureus remains the most important infectious pathogen to date. It is not only the most prevalent pathogen in implant-associated osteomyelitis (; ) but also the most destructive. Moreover, S. aureus infection of the bone is considered very difficult to cure (; ), due to specific mechanisms that enable bacterial survival within the implant and bone microenvironment following revision surgery and antibiotic therapy [reviewed in and ].
Our discovery of S. aureus invasion of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network (OLCN) of the cortical bone, initially described in murine models for implant-associated osteomyelitis () and later validated in human diabetic foot infections (), has become a prominent area of active research. In order to invade the submicron-sized canaliculi of the OLCN, S. aureus must deform from a 1-μm cocci to an elongated “rod-shaped” cell, measuring as small as 0.2 μm in diameter (). This submicron-scale invasion of bone permits S. aureus long-term survival and evasion of immune cell attack. Despite the challenges associated with identifying S. aureus bacterial cells deep within the infected bone, like finding a needle in a haystack, additional studies in models of fracture-related infection and implant-associated infection have been able to corroborate this novel mode of persistence (; ).
Toward elucidation of druggable targets to effectively treat chronic osteomyelitis, recent studies aimed to determine the genetic mechanism of S. aureus deformation and propagation through the OLCN. Previous work developed an in vitro model called the microfluidic silicon membrane-canalicular array (μSiM-CA) to mimic the physiologic dimensions of canaliculi to screen a library of S. aureus transposon insertion mutants (, ). These studies showed that deletion of pbp4, encoding the cell wall transpeptidase penicillin binding protein 4 (PBP4), significantly reduced S. aureus propagation through nanopores in vitro and eliminated S. aureus invasion of the OLCN while also decreasing the extent of pathogenic bone loss at the infection site in a murine model of implant-associated osteomyelitis (). However, the mechanism of PBP4 involvement in OLCN invasion, as well as modulation of pathogenic bone loss, remains unclear. In addition, expression of S. aureus surface protein C (SasC) was critical for S. aureus deformation and propagation through nanopores () in vitro but has not yet been validated for OLCN in vivo.
We hypothesize that S. aureus invades the OLCN via the guidance of durotaxis and haptotaxis cues, which are defined as motility guided by substrate stiffness (; ) and three-dimensional (3D) extracellular matrix (ECM) organization (; ), respectively. Therefore, the current study aims to build upon previous work by investigating the role of select S. aureus genes across different functional groups in osteomyelitis pathogenesis to improve our understanding of S. aureus OLCN invasion. Specifically, this work investigates cell wall biosynthesis proteins: penicillin binding protein 3 (PBP3), autolysin (Atl), and cell shape-determining protein MreC (MreC), hypothesized to mediated durotaxis; and surface adhesin proteins: clumping factor A (ClfA) and SasC, hypothesized to mediate haptotaxis (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
The bacterial cell wall is primarily composed of peptidoglycan, whose synthesis is catalyzed by PBPs. S. aureus has four genome-encoded PBPs (1–4), where PBP1 and PBP2 are essential proteins for cell wall synthesis (
In addition to cell wall synthesis machinery, S. aureus surface adhesins were investigated for their role in OLCN invasion. S. aureus has a broad range of cell wall-anchored surface adhesin proteins, which are important for bacterial virulence and survival (
This study applied in vitro and in vivo methods to investigate the role of S. aureus cell wall synthesis machinery and surface adhesins in OLCN invasion. Here, we observe similarities between infection phenotypes of S. aureus pbp4 and pbp3 deletion mutants, including hindered OLCN invasion. Deletion of cell wall synthesis genes pbp4, pbp3, and atl showed modulated infection pathogenesis with altered abscess formation and decreased pathogenic bone loss, while mreC expression did not have a role in S. aureus implant-associated osteomyelitis. In contrast, deletion of surface adhesin genes clfA and sasC had marginal effects on infection pathogenesis in implant-associated osteomyelitis, leading to the conclusion that durotaxis may be the primary mechanism for S. aureus OLCN invasion and propagation.
Materials and Methods
Strains and Growth Conditions
Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and derivative mutant strains and primers used in this work are described in Supplementary Tables 1, 2, respectively. S. aureus strains were grown on tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates or in tryptic soy broth (TSB) at 37°C. S. aureus USA300 pbp4-null (Δpbp4), pbp3-null (Δpbp3), atl-null (Δatl), clfA-null (ΔclfA), sasC-null (ΔsasC), and mreC-null (ΔmreC) strains were constructed by allelic replacement using Escherichia coli–S. aureus shuttle vector pWedge, as previously described (
Growth Rate Measurements
Staphylococcus aureus cultures were prepared by growing overnight, and then subcultured the following day. Each strain of S. aureus was grown in a 96-well plate at 37°C with shaking in a spectrophotometer, and growth rate was evaluated by measuring optical density at 600 nm every hour from 0 to 24 h.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize bacterial cell morphology and μSiM-CA bacterial propagation as previously described (
Microfluidic Silicon Membrane-Canalicular Array Propagation Experiments
Microfluidic silicon membrane-canalicular array devices were constructed as previously described (
The μSiM-CA device was loaded by adding 10 μl of sterile TSB to the basal chamber of the device via the side inlet channels, and 80 μl of pure bacterial subcultures to the apical chamber above the nanoporous membrane. S. aureus strains were incubated in the top chamber of the μSiM-CA at 37°C for 6 h. Following incubation in the μSiM-CA, apical (input) and basal (output) media were aspirated and outgrown overnight to expand the resultant bacterial populations and confirm or deny bacterial propagation by positive or negative culture.
Murine Model for Implant-Associated Infection
All animal studies were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the University Committee on Animal Resources at the University of Rochester Medical Center and in accordance with the Animal Welfare Act. Surgeries were performed as previously described (
Colony-Forming Unit Quantification
Tissue and implant CFUs were quantified as previously described (
Histologic Analysis
Histologic staining of infected and sterile tibiae was performed as previously described (
Slides were deparaffinized and stained with Brown–Brenn modified Gram stain to visualize gram-positive bacteria. Brown–Brenn stain results in gram-positive organisms stained dark purple, cell nuclei stained pink, and connective tissue stained yellow. Slides were digitized using a VS120 Virtual Slide Microscope (Olympus, Waltham, MA, United States). The number of staphylococcal abscess communities (SACs) were quantified and averaged across three histological levels, for four biological replicates by manually counting in Olympus OlyVIA software. The area of SACs/tibia area was quantified using a custom Analysis Protocol Package (APP) in Visiopharm (v.2019.07; Hoersholm, Denmark). The APP utilizes colorimetric histomorphometry to detect gram-positive bacteria (dark purple) to accurately quantify SAC area.
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was performed to visualize TRAP+ osteoclasts. TRAP stain results in TRAP+ osteoclasts stained red/purple with a blue/green tissue background. Slides were digitized using a VS120 Virtual Slide Microscope (Olympus, Waltham, MA, United States). % TRAP area was quantified using a custom APP in Visiopharm (v.2019.07; Hoersholm, Denmark) within the whole tibia. The APP utilizes colorimetric histomorphometry to detect TRAP staining (red/purple), fast green counterstain (blue/green), and background (white) in order to accurately segment TRAP+ area for quantification. TRAP quantification was blinded.
Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging and Analysis
Infected tibias were fixed in 10% NBF for 3 days at room temperature with associated soft tissue and implant left intact, then rinsed in PBS and distilled water before soft tissue was dissected, and implant was removed. Infected tibias were imaged ex vivo by μCT in a VivaCT 40 (Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) with a 10.5-μm isotropic voxel size, using an integration time of 300 ms, energy of 55 kV, and intensity of 145 μA. Resultant DICOM files were used to create a 3D reconstruction of bone tissue using Amira software (FEI Visualization Sciences Group, Burlington, MA, United States). Bone tissue was first binarized and reconstructed by thresholding. Medial hole and lateral hole volume quantification was performed by manual segmentation of the void area and interpolating through the depth of the tibial cortex, as previously described (
Transmission Electron Microscopy “Pop-Off”
Regions of interest within serially sectioned paraffin blocks of infected tibia samples, adjacent to Brown–Brenn–stained sections, were processed for TEM using the “pop-off” technique, as previously described (
Quantification of Local Cytokines
As mentioned, bone tissue was harvested at day 14 post-infection and homogenized on ice in 3 ml of sterile PBS. Bone homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C to pellet bone tissue. Supernatant was aspirated and frozen in several aliquots to reduce freeze–thaw cycles and maintain cytokine stability. The dilution factor of bone homogenate supernatant was optimized for each cytokine sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Cytokines investigated include receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Dilutions used for RANKL, IL-1β, and IL-6 were 1:5, 1:25, and no dilution, respectively. ELISA protocols were performed as per the manufacturer’s recommendations (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, United States, catalog #: MTR00, MLB00C, and M6000B). Briefly, diluted bone homogenate supernatant was incubated in capture-antibody-coated wells for 2 h at room temperature. Next, wells were washed, and then incubated with secondary conjugated antibody for 2 h. Wells were washed again and incubated with substrate solution for 30 min. Finally, stop solution was added, and absorbance was read at 450 nm with wavelength correction at 570 nm. Additionally, cytokine levels were normalized to total protein measured by a Pierce Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States) and reported as ng cytokine/mg total protein to account for variability in tibia-to-tibia size.
Statistical Analyses
Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of nominal data to a control group, including evaluation of implant stability. Unpaired t-test was used when two groups were compared, including ΔmreC vs. wild-type (WT) comparisons in Supplementary Material. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s post-hoc for multiple comparisons was used to compare multiple variations such as differences in growth rate. One-way ANOVA, with Dunnett’s post-hoc for multiple comparisons vs. WT was used for data such as cell sizes, CFUs, abscess quantifications, μCT analysis, % TRAP quantification, and cytokine concentrations. CFU data were log transformed to achieve normal distributions for statistical analyses. All statistics were analyzed using GraphPad Prism.
Results
In vitro Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Mutants
To expand our understanding of S. aureus invasion of the OLCN during osteomyelitis, we aimed to characterize the role of S. aureus cell wall synthesis proteins (PBP3, Atl, and MreC) and surface proteins (ClfA and SasC) in vitro and in vivo. Markerless deletion mutants were created in the methicillin-resistant strain of S. aureus, USA300. To eliminate potential confounding factors in downstream studies, mutant strain cell morphology and growth rate were evaluated. SEM imaging showed that all mutant strains have unchanged cell morphology (Figure 2A), with the exception of the atl deletion mutant (Figure 3). As the primary peptidoglycan hydrolase, loss of Atl is expected to cause an aberrant cell wall phenotype. Here, we observed atl deletion mutants having rougher cell wall compared to WT, which has been shown in previous work (
FIGURE 2

Staphylococcus aureus deletion mutant cell morphology and growth rate characterization. Cultures of WT USA300 and Δpbp3, Δatl, ΔmreC, ΔclfA, and ΔsasC were grown on glass coverslips and processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM; n = 3 independent replicates). Representative images are shown to illustrate the absence of gross morphological differences in all mutant stains besides the Δatl mutant strain (A). The Δatl mutant shows characteristic “rough” cell wall, particularly in regions of older peptidoglycan (magnified in Figure 3). Bacterial cell size was quantified as the maximum cell diameter from at least six SEM images (B; average size per image, n > 6) and the data for each bacterium with mean and SD presented (C; by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons vs. WT, n = 100). A Gaussian curve was fit to a histogram of cell sizes to visualize the distribution of cell diameters for each genotype (D). WT and deletion mutants were grown in liquid culture and measured by optical density at 600 nm hourly for 24 h. The Δpbp3 mutant showed significantly reduced growth during stationary phase, and Δatl showed extremely hindered growth through all phases (E). Growth rate was evaluated by via two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc for multiple comparisons vs. WT (n = 3, data presented as mean ± SEM). Strains Δatl and Δpbp3 were significantly different from WT at time points 3–23 and 8–23 h, respectively (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3

Deletion of atl results in aberrant S. aureus cell wall morphology. Cultures of WT USA300 and Δatl were grown on glass coverslips and processed for SEM imaging (n = 3 independent experiments). High-magnification images show the characteristic “rough” cell wall of the Δatl strain compared to the smooth cell wall of WT S. aureus. Red arrows denote regions of “rough” surfaces that are primarily in older regions of the cell wall, while newly separated cells show “smoother” surfaces in regions of newly synthesized cell wall, noted by blue arrows.
Bacterial cell size was quantified by measuring the diameters of 100 cells across at least six SEM images. Mean bacterial cell size across images (Figure 2B) and across all cells (Figures 2C,D) showed atl deletion resulted in ∼6% increase in bacterial cell size. Next, the in vitro growth rate of WT S. aureus and mutant strains was evaluated by optical density at 600 nm measured every hour for 24 h (Figure 2E). While atl deletion resulted in an apparent decrease in growth (significantly different from WT at time points 3–23 h, p < 0.05), this mutant strain is known to form cell aggregates or “megaclusters” (
The μSiM-CA in vitro model was used to determine the mutant strains’ ability to deform and propagate through the 0.5-μm pores of the membrane to the basal chamber of the device (Figure 4A). Note, previous work screened pools of transposon mutants in the μSiM-CA (
FIGURE 4

Evaluating S. aureus deletion mutant deformation and propagation through 0.5-μm pores in the microfluidic silicon membrane-canalicular array (μSiM-CA). Pure cultures of WT USA300, Δpbp3, Δatl, ΔmreC, ΔclfA, and ΔsasC were assayed for their ability to propagate through the 0.5-μm pores of the μSiM-CA device (n = 7 independent experiments) and processed for SEM imaging of the bottom surface of the membrane (n = 3 devices imaged per group). Experimental design is illustrated in panel (A). Representative SEM images are shown at 5,000× (top panel) and 15,000× (bottom panel) for each genotype (B–G), and the fraction of successful propagation to the bottom is indicated. As shown in previous work, WT bacteria readily propagated through the 0.5-μm pores following 6 h of incubation (B). S. aureus lacking mreC expression showed no difference from WT (C). Atl and clfA deletion resulted in “attenuated propagation,” characterized by very few bacterial cells present on the bottom surface of the membrane (D,E). Finally, pbp3 and sasC deletion mutants displayed “null propagation” with zero bacterial cells cultured in the bottom channel or visualized on the bottom surface of the membrane (F,G). Only cellular and media debris were found on the bottom surface of membranes from Δpbp3 studies (F).
TABLE 1
![]() |
In vitro characterization of S. aureus deletion mutants across functional groups.
# Data adapted from,
Evaluating Staphylococcus aureus Pathogenesis in vivo
Following in vitro characterization, WT S. aureus and mutant strains (Δpbp3, Δatl, ΔmreC, ΔclfA, and ΔsasC) were evaluated for pathogenesis and, ultimately, OLCN invasion in vivo using a murine model of implant-associated osteomyelitis (
FIGURE 5

Staphylococcus aureus cell wall synthesis mutants show diminished septic implant loosening and significantly decreased bone marrow abscess formation, while S. aureus surface adhesin mutants show minimal changes in pathogenesis. L-shaped wires contaminated with WT, Δpbp3, Δatl, ΔclfA, and ΔsasC S. aureus were surgically implanted through the tibia of mice as previously described. X-rays were obtained at the time of sacrifice to determine if the implant remained fixed or was dislodged from the tibia as a measure of septic implant loosening, as previously described (
Histopathology of infected tibiae revealed that cell wall synthesis mutants tend to form smaller (Figure 5B) and significantly less SACs (Figure 5C) within the medullary cavity of infected tibiae. On the other hand, surface adhesin mutants showed no change in total abscesses (Figure 5F), and sasC deletion may influence the size of SACs (Figure 5E). Again, mreC deletion did not change abscess formation (Supplementary Figure 3). Representative images of Brown–Brenn–stained histologic sections are summarized in Supplementary Figure 4.
Previous work determined that pbp4 deletion eliminates S. aureus OLCN invasion (
FIGURE 6

Pbp3 deletion eliminates S. aureus OLCN invasion in a murine model of implant-associated osteomyelitis. Brown–Brenn–stained histology sections were used to identify necrotic bone fragments containing gram-positive bacteria (purple) in tibiae infected with Δpbp3, Δatl, ΔclfA, and ΔsasC S. aureus, and adjacent tissue sections (n = 3 tibiae per group) were used for ultrastructural analysis via the TEM “pop-off” method to formally interrogate OLCN invasion. Representative images of Brown–Brenn histologic sections (A,C,E,G) and TEM micrographs are shown for each infection genotype (B,D,F,H). Pbp3 deletion does not eliminate S. aureus colonization of the bone (A,A’). However, Δpbp3 bacteria colonization appears to be limited to microcracks (B) and blood vessel canals (B’) but were not found in submicron canaliculi. On the other hand, deletion of atl, clfA, and sasC does not inhibit S. aureus invasion of canaliculi (C–H). Note the submicron deformation (∅, cell diameters are measured where indicated) and linearized propagation of Δatl, ΔclfA, and ΔsasC cells within bone canaliculi (D’,F’,H). Note the extreme deformation of Δatl S. aureus cells at the leading edge of invasion, measuring at 0.35 μm in diameter and 2.3 μm in length (D’).
TABLE 2
![]() |
Evaluation of S. aureus deletion mutant bone infection phenotypes.
#Data adapted from,
Evaluating the Host Response to Staphylococcus aureus Bone Infection
Next, the host response to infection was characterized by measuring peri-implant osteolysis and local cytokine production. First, μCT analysis was performed to quantify the extent of peri-implant osteolysis through the medial and lateral tibial cortices as previously described (
FIGURE 7

Staphylococcus aureus cell wall biosynthesis mutations reduce osteoclast-mediated peri-implant osteolysis compared to WT, and surface adhesin mutations do not change bone loss. Sterile or S. aureus-infected tibiae were harvested on day 14 postinfection for micro-computed tomography (μCT) analyses. The μCT DICOM scans were reconstructed using AmiraTM, and medial hole volume was identified though the depth of the tibial cortex by manual segmentation and interpolated between slices. Representative 3D reconstructions of the μCT scans for all infection and sterile pin groups are shown from the medial side (A; n = 5–6). Medial hole volumes for each tibia are presented with mean ± SD for each group (B,C,E,F; n = 5–6). Pbp3 deletion resulted in less osteolysis of the medial cortex (B), similar to pbp4 deletion shown in previous work (
Histologic staining for TRAP within tibial cross sections was performed to determine osteoclast activity within sterile and infected tibial cross sections. % TRAP area within the whole tibia was averaged across multiple histologic levels per sample. Again, pbp3 deletion significantly reduced TRAP staining and, by extension, reduced osteoclast activity compared to WT infection (Figure 7C). Tibiae infected with Δpbp3 S. aureus showed statistically similar % TRAP area to sterile pin tibiae. These data support μCT quantification of peri-implant osteolysis.
To expand our understanding of peri-implant osteolysis during infection, the production of osteoclast activating cytokine, RANKL, was quantified by ELISA of infected and contralateral bone tissue homogenate at day 14 post-infection. First, contralateral tibiae showed undetectable levels of RANKL, confirming the response of a local infection versus systemic. Further, serum cytokine levels were undetectable (data not shown). Archived Δpbp4 infected tibiae were also processed for cytokine quantification. Interestingly, pbp4 deletion showed unchanged RANKL levels compared to WT despite an apparent decrease in osteolysis and osteoclast activity, described in previous work (
In addition to RANKL, local levels of presumed proinflammatory and osteoclast-activating cytokines, IL-1β and IL-6, were measured for WT and mutant S. aureus infection groups. Previous work has shown that IL-1β and IL-6 production is increased during osteomyelitis (
FIGURE 8

Staphylococcus aureus cell wall synthesis and surface adhesin mutants show significant changes in host proinflammatory cytokine production at the infection site. Local concentrations of IL-1β (A,B) and IL-6 (C,D) were quantified for each infection genotype as well as within contralateral limbs by measuring via ELISA of bone tissue homogenate. Significance was evaluated by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc for multiple comparisons vs. WT, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n = 4–6.
TABLE 3
![]() |
Host response to infection by S. aureus deletion mutants.
#Data adapted from,
Discussion
This study investigated the role of select S. aureus cell wall synthesis proteins and surface adhesins in bone infection pathogenesis and invasion of the OLCN. We hypothesized that S. aureus cell wall synthesis machinery and surface adhesins enable durotaxis- and haptotaxis-driven bacterial cell invasion of the canalicular network in infected bone.
Previous studies identified PBP4 as a critical factor for S. aureus invasion of the OLCN and pathogenesis in osteomyelitis (
Additionally, we aimed to elucidate the role of major peptidoglycan hydrolase, Atl, during S. aureus bone infection pathogenesis and OLCN invasion, given its opposite function to PBPs. In agreement with previous studies, atl deletion produced slightly larger cells with rough cell surfaces and increased cell aggregation (
In order to maintain constant bacterial cell shape during growth and division, the of activity PBPs must be in balance with the activity of cell wall hydrolases to synthesize and degrade peptidoglycan during growth and division (
In continuation, we hypothesized that the transmembrane protein MreC could be involved in S. aureus deformation from cocci to rod shape during OLCN invasion. In rod-shaped bacteria, actin homolog MreB polymerizes to form cytoskeletal filaments that localize with MreC and PBPs to coordinate peptidoglycan synthesis and cell wall elongation (
Lastly, surface adhesins, ClfA and SasC, were investigated as potential modulators of S. aureus haptotaxis in bone infection and OLCN invasion. ClfA was selected because it showed a modest decrease in μSiM-CA nanopore propagation in previous work and is important in bone infection pathogenesis in obese/type 2 diabetic mice (
Next, we measured pathogenic bone loss by quantifying osteolytic bone volume, relative osteoclast presence, and production of osteoclast-stimulating cytokine, RANKL. Chronic inflammation due to osteomyelitis can cause a sustained release of proinflammatory cytokines from innate and adaptive immune cells, resulting in osteoclast activation and pathogenic bone loss (
To further interrogate these dichotomous observations, we measured the production of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1β and IL-6.
Surprisingly, IL-6 was elevated in infections by clfA, sasC, and atl deletion mutants. IL-6 is often grouped with IL-1β and RANKL as a proinflammatory and osteoclast-activating cytokine (
To conclude, this study showed that cell wall synthesis machinery can modulate S. aureus pathogenesis in osteomyelitis. This is supported by significant changes in OLCN invasion, abscess formation, and pathogenic bone loss with loss of PBP4, PBP3, or Atl. We postulate that S. aureus cell wall composition and peptidoglycan homeostasis are key factors for submicron invasion of canaliculi. Further, S. aureus proteins responsible for adhesin to bone and/or ECM molecules are known to be redundant, and therefore, it is unlikely that the role of haptotaxis can be captured in single gene deletion studies.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the University Committee on Animal Resources at the University of Rochester Medical Center.
Author contributions
EM, GM, and ES conceived the study. EM performed all the experiments and wrote the manuscript. ALG assisted with creation of deletion mutants and experimentation. LH assisted with the experimentation. KDB and CG performed the electron microscopy. JM, HA, SG, and ES supervised the study. All authors contributed to the final version.
Funding
This study was also supported by grants from AO-Trauma, Clinical Priority Program (Davos, Switzerland), NIAMS P50 AR072000 and NIAMS P30 AR069655 awarded to ES.
Conflict of interest
JM is a founder of SiMPore, an early-stage company commercializing ultrathin silicon-based technologies. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.723498/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlderK. D.LeeI.MungerA. M.KwonH. K.MorrisM. T.CahillS. V.et al (2020). Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus in bone and joint infections: a mechanism of disease recurrence, inflammation, and bone and cartilage destruction.Bone141:115568. 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115568
2
AmarasekaraD. S.YuJ.RhoJ. (2015). Bone loss triggered by the cytokine network in inflammatory autoimmune diseases.J. Immunol. Res.2015:832127.
3
AmarasekaraD. S.YunH.KimS.LeeN.KimH.RhoJ. (2018). Regulation of osteoclast differentiation by cytokine networks.Immune Netw.18:e8.
4
AndreevD.LiuM.WeidnerD.KachlerK.FaasM.GrüneboomA.et al (2020). Osteocyte necrosis triggers osteoclast-mediated bone loss through macrophage-inducible C-type lectin.J. Clin. Investig.1304811–4830. 10.1172/jci134214
5
ArciolaC. R.AnY. H.CampocciaD.DonatiM. E.MontanaroL. (2005). Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates.Int. J. Artific. Organs281091–1100. 10.1177/039139880502801106
6
BoseJ. L.LehmanM. K.FeyP. D.BaylesK. W. (2012). Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL murein hydrolase activities in cell division, autolysis, and biofilm formation.PLoS One7:e42244. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042244
7
CanfieldG. S.SchwingelJ. M.FoleyM. H.VoreK. L.BoonanantanasarnK.GillA. L.et al (2013). Evolution in fast forward: a potential role for mutators in accelerating Staphylococcus aureus pathoadaptation.J. Bacteriol.195615–628. 10.1128/jb.00733-12
8
Carballido-LópezR.FormstoneA. (2007). Shape determination in Bacillus subtilis.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.10611–616. 10.1016/j.mib.2007.09.008
9
ChengA. G.DeDentA. C.SchneewindO.MissiakasD. (2011). A play in four acts: Staphylococcus aureus abscess formation.Trends Microbiol.19225–232. 10.1016/j.tim.2011.01.007
10
ClarkeS. R.FosterS. J. (2006). Surface adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus.Adv. Microb. Physiol.51187–224. 10.1016/s0065-2911(06)51004-5
11
DaliaA. B.WeiserJ. N. (2011). Minimization of bacterial size allows for complement evasion and is overcome by the agglutinating effect of antibody.Cell Host Microbe10486–496. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.009
12
de Mesy BentleyK. L.MacDonaldA.SchwarzE. M.OhI. (2018). Chronic osteomyelitis with Staphylococcus aureus deformation in submicron canaliculi of Osteocytes: a case report.JBJS Case Connect.8e8. 10.2106/jbjs.cc.17.00154
13
de Mesy BentleyK. L.TrombettaR.NishitaniK.Bello-IrizarryS. N.NinomiyaM.ZhangL.et al (2017). Evidence of Staphylococcus aureus deformation, proliferation, and migration in canaliculi of live cortical bone in murine models of osteomyelitis.J. Bone Miner. Res.32985–990. 10.1002/jbmr.3055
14
de Mesy JensenK. L.di Sant’AgneseP. A. (1992). Large block embedding and “pop-off” technique for immunoelectron microscopy.Ultrastruct. Pathol.1651–59. 10.3109/01913129209074550
15
DivakaruniA. V.BaidaC.WhiteC. L.GoberJ. W. (2007). The cell shape proteins MreB and MreC control cell morphogenesis by positioning cell wall synthetic complexes.Mol. Microbiol.66174–188. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05910.x
16
DomanskiP. J.PatelP. R.BayerA. S.ZhangL.HallA. E.SyribeysP. J.et al (2005). Characterization of a humanized monoclonal antibody recognizing clumping factor A expressed by Staphylococcus aureus.Infect. Immun.735229–5232. 10.1128/iai.73.8.5229-5232.2005
17
FarnsworthC. W.SchottE. M.JensenS. E.ZukoskiJ.BenvieA. M.RefaaiM. A.et al (2017). Adaptive upregulation of clumping factor A (ClfA) by S. aureus in the obese, type 2 diabetic host mediates increased virulence.Infect. Immun.85:e001005-16.
18
FosterT. J.GeogheganJ. A.GaneshV. K.HöökM. (2014). Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.1249–62. 10.1038/nrmicro3161
19
FosterT. J.HöökM. (1998). Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus.Trends Microbiol.6484–488. 10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01400-0
20
GabayC. (2006). Interleukin-6 and chronic inflammation.Arthr. Res. Ther.8 Suppl. 2(Suppl. 2):S3.
21
GedbjergN.LaRosaR.HunterJ. G.VarroneJ. J.KatesS. L.SchwarzE. M.et al (2013). Anti-glucosaminidase IgG in sera as a biomarker of host immunity against Staphylococcus aureus in orthopaedic surgery patients.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.95:e171. 10.2106/jbjs.l.01654
22
HirschhausenN.SchlesierT.PetersG.HeilmannC. (2012). Characterization of the modular design of the autolysin/adhesin Aaa from Staphylococcus aureus.PLoS One7:e40353. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040353
23
HsuS.ThakarR.LiepmannD.LiS. (2005). Effects of shear stress on endothelial cell haptotaxis on micropatterned surfaces.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.337401–409. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.272
24
KaplanskiG.MarinV.Montero-JulianF.FarnarierC. (2003). IL-6: a regulator of the transition from neutrophil to monocyte recruitment during inflammation.Trends Immunol.2425–29. 10.1016/s1471-4906(02)00013-3
25
KatesS. L.OwenJ. R.BeckC. A.XieC.MuthukrishnanG.DaissJ. L.et al (2020). Lack of humoral immunity against glucosaminidase is associated with postoperative complications in Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.1021842–1848. 10.2106/jbjs.20.00029
26
KishimotoT. (1989). The biology of interleukin-6.Blood741–10.
27
KluytmansJ.Van BelkumA.VerbrughH. (1997). Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.10505–520. 10.1128/cmr.10.3.505
28
KruseT.Bork-JensenJ.GerdesK. (2005). The morphogenetic MreBCD proteins of Escherichia coli form an essential membrane-bound complex.Mol. Microbiol.5578–89. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04367.x
29
KylväjäR.OjalehtoT.KainulainenV.VirkolaR.Westerlund-WikströmB. (2016). Penicillin binding protein 3 of Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 8325-4 binds and activates human plasminogen.BMC Res. Notes9:389. 10.1186/s13104-016-2190-4
30
LiD.GromovK.SøballeK.PuzasJ. E.O’KeefeR. J.AwadH.et al (2008). Quantitative mouse model of implant-associated osteomyelitis and the kinetics of microbial growth, osteolysis, and humoral immunity.J. Orthop. Res.2696–105. 10.1002/jor.20452
31
LoskillP.PereiraP. M.JungP.BischoffM.HerrmannM.PinhoM. G.et al (2014). Reduction of the peptidoglycan crosslinking causes a decrease in stiffness of the Staphylococcus aureus cell envelope.Biophys. J.1071082–1089. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.029
32
LowyF. D. (1998). Staphylococcus aureus infections.N. Engl. J. Med.339520–532.
33
MastersE. A.de Mesy BentleyK. L.GillA. L.HaoS. P.GallowayC. A.SalminenA. T.et al (2020). Identification of penicillin binding protein 4 (PBP4) as a critical factor for Staphylococcus aureus bone invasion during osteomyelitis in mice.PLoS Pathog.16:e1008988. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008988
34
MastersE. A.HaoS. P.KenneyH. M.MoritaY.GallowayC. A.de Mesy BentleyK. L.et al (2021). Distinct vasculotropic versus osteotropic features of S. agalactiae versus S. aureus implant-associated bone infection in mice.J. Orthop. Res.39389–401. 10.1002/jor.24962
35
MastersE. A.SalminenA. T.BegoloS.LukeE. N.BarrettS. C.OverbyC. T.et al (2019a). An in vitro platform for elucidating the molecular genetics of S. aureus invasion of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network during chronic osteomyelitis.Nanomedicine21:102039. 10.1016/j.nano.2019.102039
36
MastersE. A.TrombettaR. P.de Mesy BentleyK. L.BoyceB. F.GillA. L.GillS. R.et al (2019b). Evolving concepts in bone infection: redefining “biofilm”,“acute vs. chronic osteomyelitis”,“the immune proteome” and “local antibiotic therapy”.Bone Res.7:20.
37
McDevittD.FrancoisP.VaudauxP.FosterT. J. (1994). Molecular characterization of the clumping factor (fibrinogen receptor) of Staphylococcus aureus.Mol. Microbiol.11237–248. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00304.x
38
MuthukrishnanG.MastersE. A.DaissJ. L.SchwarzE. M. (2019). Mechanisms of immune evasion and bone tissue colonization that make Staphylococcus aureus the primary pathogen in osteomyelitis.Curr. Osteopor. Rep.17395–404. 10.1007/s11914-019-00548-4
39
NavratnaV.NadigS.SoodV.PrasadK.ArakereG.GopalB. (2010). Molecular basis for the role of Staphylococcus aureus penicillin binding protein 4 in antimicrobial resistance.J. Bacteriol.192134–144. 10.1128/jb.00822-09
40
NegaM.TribelliP. M.HippK.StahlM.GötzF. (2020). New insights in the coordinated amidase and glucosaminidase activity of the major autolysin (Atl) in Staphylococcus aureus.Commun. Biol.3:695.
41
NishitaniK.BeckC. A.RosenbergA. F.KatesS. L.SchwarzE. M.DaissJ. L. (2015). A diagnostic serum antibody test for patients with Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.4732735–2749. 10.1007/s11999-015-4354-2
42
OudinM. J.JonasO.KosciukT.BroyeL. C.GuidoB. C.WyckoffJ.et al (2016). Tumor cell–driven extracellular matrix remodeling drives haptotaxis during metastatic progression.Cancer Discov.6516–531. 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-1183
43
ParviziJ.GhanemE.AzzamK.JaberiF.HozackW. (2008). Periprosthetic infection: are current treatment strategies adequate?Acta Orthop. Belgica74:793.
44
PinhoM. G.de LencastreH.TomaszA. (2000). Cloning, characterization, and inactivation of the gene pbpC, encoding penicillin-binding protein 3 of Staphylococcus aureus.J. Bacteriol.1821074–1079. 10.1128/jb.182.4.1074-1079.2000
45
PollittE. J.SzkutaP. T.BurnsN.FosterS. J. (2018). Staphylococcus aureus infection dynamics.PLoS Pathog.14:e1007112. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007112
46
PulidoL.GhanemE.JoshiA.PurtillJ. J.ParviziJ. (2008). Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors.Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.4661710–1715. 10.1007/s11999-008-0209-4
47
PutnamN. E.FulbrightL. E.CurryJ. M.FordC. A.PetrongloJ. R.HendrixA. S.et al (2019). MyD88 and IL-1R signaling drive antibacterial immunity and osteoclast-driven bone loss during Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.PLoS Pathog.15:e1007744. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007744
48
ReichmannN. T.TavaresA. C.SaraivaB. M.JousselinA.ReedP.PereiraA. R.et al (2019). SEDS–bPBP pairs direct lateral and septal peptidoglycan synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus.Nat. Microbiol.41368–1377. 10.1038/s41564-019-0437-2
49
SauvageE.KerffF.TerrakM.AyalaJ. A.CharlierP. (2008). The penicillin-binding proteins: structure and role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.32234–258. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00105.x
50
ScheffersD.-J.PinhoM. G. (2005). Bacterial cell wall synthesis: new insights from localization studies.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.69585–607. 10.1128/mmbr.69.4.585-607.2005
51
SchindelinJ.Arganda-CarrerasI.FriseE.KaynigV.LongairM.PietzschT.et al (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis.Nat. Methods9676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019
52
SchlesierT.SiegmundA.RescherU.HeilmannC. (2020). Characterization of the Atl-mediated staphylococcal internalization mechanism.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.310:151463. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2020.151463
53
SchroederK.JularicM.HorsburghS. M.HirschhausenN.NeumannC.BertlingA.et al (2009). Molecular characterization of a novel Staphylococcus aureus surface protein (SasC) involved in cell aggregation and biofilm accumulation.PLoS One4:e7567. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007567
54
SteeveK. T.PadrinesM.ThéoleyreS.HeymannD.FortunY. (2004). IL-6, RANKL, TNF-alpha/IL-1: interrelations in bone resorption pathophysiology.Cytok. Growth Fact. Rev.1549–60. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2003.10.005
55
SunyerR.ConteV.EscribanoJ.Elosegui-ArtolaA.LabernadieA.ValonL.et al (2016). Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission.Science3531157–1161. 10.1126/science.aaf7119
56
SunyerR.TrepatX. (2020). Durotaxis.Curr. Biol.30R383–R387.
57
TavaresA. C.FernandesP. B.Carballido-LópezR.PinhoM. G. (2015). MreC and MreD proteins are not required for growth of Staphylococcus aureus.PLoS One10:e0140523. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140523
58
TkaczykC.HamiltonM. M.SadowskaA.ShiY.ChangC. S.ChowdhuryP.et al (2016). Targeting alpha toxin and ClfA with a multimechanistic monoclonal-antibody-based approach for prophylaxis of serious Staphylococcus aureus disease.mBio7:e00528-16.
59
TomizawaT.IshikawaM.Bello-IrizarryS. N.de Mesy BentleyK. L.ItoH.KatesS. L.et al (2020). Biofilm producing Staphylococcus epidermidis (RP62A strain) inhibits osseous integration without osteolysis and histopathology in a murine septic implant model.J. Orthop. Res.38852–860. 10.1002/jor.24512
60
VarroneJ. J.de Mesy BentleyK. L.Bello-IrizarryS. N.NishitaniK.MackS.HunterJ. G.et al (2014). Passive immunization with anti-glucosaminidase monoclonal antibodies protects mice from implant-associated osteomyelitis by mediating opsonophagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus megaclusters.J. Orthop. Res.321389–1396. 10.1002/jor.22672
61
VarroneJ. J.LiD.DaissJ. L.SchwarzE. M. (2011). Anti-glucosaminidase monoclonal antibodies as a passive immunization for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) orthopaedic infections.Bonekey Osteovision8187–194. 10.1138/20110506
62
VermassenA.LeroyS.TalonR.ProvotC.PopowskaM.DesvauxM. (2019). Cell wall hydrolases in bacteria: insight on the diversity of cell wall amidases, glycosidases and peptidases toward peptidoglycan.Front. Microbiol.10:331. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00331
63
VollmerW.JorisB.CharlierP.FosterS. (2008). Bacterial peptidoglycan (murein) hydrolases.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.32259–286. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00099.x
64
WheelerR.TurnerR. D.BaileyR. G.SalamagaB.MesnageS.MesnageS.et al (2015). Bacterial cell enlargement requires control of cell wall stiffness mediated by peptidoglycan hydrolases.mBio6:e00660-15.
65
WykeA. W.WardJ. B.HayesM. V.CurtisN. A. (1981). A role in vivo for penicillin-binding protein-4 of Staphylococcus aureus.Eur. J. Biochem.119389–393. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05620.x
66
XingZ.GauldieJ.CoxG.BaumannH.JordanaM.LeiX. F.et al (1998). IL-6 is an antiinflammatory cytokine required for controlling local or systemic acute inflammatory responses.J. Clin. Investig.101311–320. 10.1172/jci1368
67
YoshidaH.KawaiF.ObayashiE.AkashiS.RoperD. I.TameJ. R.et al (2012). Crystal structures of penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the apo and cefotaxime-bound forms.J. Mol. Biol.423351–364. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.07.012
68
ZhuQ.LiuB.SunB. (2020). SpoVG modulates cell aggregation in Staphylococcus aureus by regulating sasC expression and extracellular DNA release.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.86:e00591-20.
69
ZollerS. D.HegdeV.BurkeZ. D. C.ParkH. Y.IshmaelC. R.BlumsteinG. W.et al (2020). Evading the host response: Staphylococcus “hiding” in cortical bone canalicular system causes increased bacterial burden.Bone Res.8:43.
Summary
Keywords
S. aureus, osteomyelitis, cell wall, PBP 3, autolysin, surface adhesion, osteocyte canaliculi, osteolysis
Citation
Masters EA, Muthukrishnan G, Ho L, Gill AL, de Mesy Bentley KL, Galloway CA, McGrath JL, Awad HA, Gill SR and Schwarz EM (2021) Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall Biosynthesis Modulates Bone Invasion and Osteomyelitis Pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 12:723498. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.723498
Received
10 June 2021
Accepted
15 July 2021
Published
16 August 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Nuno Pereira Mira, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Reviewed by
Lorena Tuchscherr, Jena University Hospital, Germany; Timothy J. Foster, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Masters, Muthukrishnan, Ho, Gill, de Mesy Bentley, Galloway, McGrath, Awad, Gill and Schwarz.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Edward M. Schwarz, Edward_schwarz@urmc.rochester.edu
This article was submitted to Infectious Diseases, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


