Abstract
Multidrug efflux pumps are inner membrane transporters that export multiple antibiotics from the inside to the outside of bacterial cells, contributing to bacterial multidrug resistance (MDR). Postgenomic analysis has demonstrated that numerous multidrug efflux pumps exist in bacteria. Also, the co-crystal structural analysis of multidrug efflux pumps revealed the drug recognition and export mechanisms, and the inhibitory mechanisms of the pumps. A single multidrug efflux pump can export multiple antibiotics; hence, developing efflux pump inhibitors is crucial in overcoming infectious diseases caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. This review article describes the role of multidrug efflux pumps in MDR, and their physiological functions and inhibitory mechanisms.
Introduction
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a serious problem in cancer chemotherapy and the treatment of bacterial infections. Drug resistance is often associated with drug efflux pumps decreasing cellular drug accumulation (; ). Drug efflux pumps are membrane proteins conserved in many living organisms, including bacterial and human cells. Specifically, drug efflux pumps that recognize multiple drugs are called multidrug efflux pumps, and they cause MDR in bacteria and cancer cells. Some representative multidrug efflux pumps include AcrB in Escherichia coli, MexB in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and P-glycoprotein (multidrug resistance protein 1; MDR1) in mammals. Regarding mammalian cells, research was published in 1976 on a glycoprotein that contributed to drug susceptibility in Chinese hamster ovary cells. This glycoprotein exhibited resistance to multiple drugs, and the protein found responsible was named P-glycoprotein (). Later, in 1986, a study describing the gene coding for P-glycoprotein, mdr1, was reported. Then in 1987, the gene was cloned from multidrug-resistant human cancer cells (). As for bacteria, in 1968, Nakamura determined the chromosomal region involved in resistance to acriflavine, other dyes, and SDS, and this region was named as acrA, to describe resistance to acriflavine (). Later, in 1993, a gene downstream of acrA, called acrB, was cloned; AcrB was proposed as a drug efflux pump containing 12 transmembrane regions (). Also, in 1992, the gene emrAB, which codes for a pump involved in MDR in E. coli, was also identified ().
After the genome sequence of Haemophilus influenza was reported in 1995, other microorganisms’ sequences were published. Genomic analysis revealed that bacteria have many genes predicted to code for drug efflux pumps (). Experimental studies on these predicted genes showed that at least 20 drug efflux pump genes are present in E. coli, and ten in Salmonella enterica (; ; ). Also, X-ray crystallography and electron-microscopy imaging of multidrug efflux pumps have been used to determine the pump structures. As a result, the antibiotic recognition, transport mechanisms, and inhibitor-binding site are being better understood (, ; , ). This review article describes the role of multidrug efflux pumps in drug resistance, their physiological function, and inhibition mechanisms, mainly for Gram-negative bacteria.
The Role of Drug Efflux Pumps in Bacterial Drug Resistance
Mechanisms of bacterial antibiotic resistance include: (1) antibiotics inactivation via enzymatic modification or degradation, (2) changes in drug target to alter the antibiotic’s affinity, (3) changes in drug permeability through changes affecting the bacterial cell surface (e.g., by changes in the expression of outer membrane proteins), and (4) active efflux of drugs from the bacterial cells. In many cases, bacterial MDR is caused by a combination of multiple mechanisms; however, active efflux alone can achieve MDR. Multidrug efflux pumps can recognize various antibiotics with different classes of action. Due to this wide range of substrate recognition, many drugs with different molecular structures that flow into bacteria through the periplasmic space or cell membrane are prevented from reaching at their target locations, as they are actively exported from the bacterial cell by the pumps. Multidrug efflux pumps contribute to both natural and acquired drug resistance in bacteria. Analyses of clinically isolated multidrug-resistant strains show that many resistant bacteria have increased gene expression that code for multidrug efflux pumps. Thus, multidrug efflux pumps are an attractive target to be studied, with the goal of creating novel drugs [both antibiotics and efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs)] that can overcome the global threat of bacterial MDR ().
Families of Drug Efflux Pumps and Their Substrates
Drug efflux pumps can be classified into six different families based on the differences in their structures and coupling energies (; ; ; ). They include ABC (ATP-binding cassette), MF (major facilitator), RND (resistance-nodulation-division), MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion), SMR (small multidrug resistance), and the relatively new family, PACE (proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux) (). Each family has a characteristic, conserved amino acid sequence. The ABC family of transporters uses the free energy released by ATP hydrolysis to ADP to facilitate the transport of its substrates across a lipid membrane in or out of the cell (). MF is the largest and most diverse superfamily of secondary transporters known to date (). It shows a variable number of transmembrane segments, with some members having 12 and others 14 transmembrane regions (). RND efflux complexes are composed of an outer membrane protein (OMP), an inner membrane protein (RND), and a periplasmic adapter protein (PAP, also known as the membrane fusion protein or MFP) that connects the OMP to the RND. The RND protein of the complex is responsible for the efflux using proton motive force (). NorM from Vibrio parahaemolyticus was initially thought to be a part of the MFS family. However, due to the lack of sequence homology to any member within the MFS family, these two proteins became the first members of the MATE family of efflux pumps (). Bacterial MATE transporters have been found to efflux cationic drugs in exchange for H+ or Na+ molecules (). SMR family of efflux pumps is composed of small proteins with four transmembrane α-helical domains (). Members of the PACE family are commonly found encoded within the core genome of a species, suggesting that these efflux pumps are perhaps involved in more than the efflux of biocides ().
Homology search can estimate the number of drug efflux pump genes present in the bacterial genomes. For example, there are 37 estimated drug efflux pump genes in E. coli. Analysis with strains that express each efflux pump showed that at least 20 drug efflux pumps contribute to drug resistance in E. coli (). Additionally, Salmonella, a pathogenic bacterium, has at least ten drug efflux pumps (Figure 1; ; ). These efflux pumps recognize antibiotics and many other compounds with unrelated structures, such as dyes, detergents, macrolides, β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and quinolones (Figure 2; ). In Gram-negative bacteria, efflux pump systems belonging to the RND family are of clinical significance. One of the most-studied multidrug efflux systems is AcrAB-TolC in E. coli, a tripartite complex comprising AcrB (an inner membrane RND-type protein), TolC (an OMP), and AcrA (a periplasmic protein), spanning the periplasm of bacterial cells (). Pumps that show homology with E. coli AcrB are MexB in P. aeruginosa, CmeB in Campylobacter, AdeB in Acinetobacter, and MtrD in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. All these pumps are involved in MDR (). Constitutively expressed pumps contribute to intrinsic bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Also, the increased expression of pump genes contributes to acquired resistance.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
The Role of Drug Efflux Pumps in Bacterial Pathogenicity
Drug efflux pumps are often studied as factors in bacterial MDR. However, studies have shown that they are for antibiotic resistance and have physiological functions. For example, previous research demonstrated by mouse infection experiments, using Salmonella drug efflux pump deletion mutants, showed that drug efflux pumps contribute to the bacterial pathogenicity (, ; ). Results showed that mice orally administered wild-type (WT) Salmonella died approximately within 6–9 days. However, the lethality by Salmonella that lacked nine drug efflux pumps was attenuated (Figure 3). The pump that contributed most to the pathogenicity was the MacAB drug efflux system, an ABC-type transporter. MacAB is thought to be an efflux system that specifically recognizes macrolide antibiotics (, ). However, the mice experimental results indicate that this system transports physiological substrates involved in bacterial pathogenicity or toxicity. Additionally, MacAB is regulated by PhoPQ, a two-component signal transduction system (TCS), that controls the pathogenicity of Salmonella; it also regulates the expression in macrophages (; , ). Furthermore, a recent study showed that linearized siderophore products secreted via MacAB efflux pump protect Salmonella from oxidative stress ().
FIGURE 3
In E. coli, acr was initially determined as the chromosomal region involved in acriflavine resistance (). In S. enterica, acrB was identified as the gene responsible for resistance to biliary salts, detergents, and murine infection (). Also, TolC of S. enterica is essential for the colonization of chicks (), and TolC of S. enteritidis is required for virulence in BALB/c mice (). The AcrAB-TolC efflux system of S. enterica plays a role in pathogenesis (), and the AcrB D408A mutant of this organism is attenuated in mice and Galleria mellonella models, showing significantly reduced invasion into intestinal epithelial cells and macrophages (). AcrAB-TolC is also involved in the resistance, fitness, and virulence of Enterobacter cloacae ().
found that the mutant of P. aeruginosa lacking mexAB-oprM is compromised in its capacity to invade or transmigrate across Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, and cannot kill mice. Additionally, reported that MdsABC, Salmonella-specific tripartite efflux pump (), showed expression-dependent alterations in the degree of resistance to extracellular oxidative stress and macrophage-mediated killing. Thin-layer chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry analyses revealed that overexpression of MdsABC led to increased secretion of 1-palmitoyl-2-stearoyl-phosphatidylserine (PSPS), affecting the ability of the bacteria to invade and survive in host cells ().
There is a large, growing body of research that demonstrates the importance of efflux pumps for bacterial colonization or infection of eukaryotic hosts (; ; ; ; ). Accumulating evidence that drug efflux pumps are involved in bacterial virulence indicates that these pumps are more clinically important than usually thought, and clarifying the physiological functions of these pumps is a crucial issue.
The Role of Drug Efflux Pumps in Bacterial Iron Metabolism
Iron is essential for many biological processes, such as amino acid and nucleotide synthesis, electron transport, and peroxide reduction (). Many bacterial species excrete iron-chelating compounds called siderophores to grow under iron-limited conditions. For example, E. coli can produce the catecholate siderophore enterobactin (also called enterochelin), which is a cyclic triester of 2,3-dihydroxybenzoylserine (DHBS) (; ). The systems responsible for enterobactin synthesis and uptake are well characterized. In contrast, the enterobactin export system is not fully understood. Additionally, drug efflux pumps, which were previously thought to be involved in drug resistance, are now known to be involved in enterobactin efflux.
RND-type AcrD and MdtABC are drug efflux pumps that can export antibiotics, including β-lactam, resulting in bacterial antimicrobial resistance (; ). In E. coli, it is known that siderophores are transported from the cytoplasm to the periplasm by EntS, an inner membrane protein (). Analysis showed that AcrD and MdtABC cooperate with AcrB to excrete a siderophore named enterobactin from the periplasm to the outside of the cell (Figure 4; ). Iron is necessary for pathogenic bacteria in order to establish pathogenicity. As bacteria aquire iron from their hosts, they have retained systems to prevent bacterial infection by inhibiting bacterial growth by controlling the bacterial iron uptake. Therefore, siderophore secretion via drug efflux pumps is necessary for the bacteria to acquire iron from a hostile environment, indicating that this mechanism contributes to the pathogenicity.
FIGURE 4
The operon encoding the drug efflux system MexAB-OprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa was initially found to be upregulated in the siderophore deficient mutant that can grow on an iron-deficient medium (). In this report, Poole et al. showed that this operon is involved in the secretion of the siderophore pioverdin as well as in drug sensitivity of this organism (). Furthermore, recently reported that MacAB, which is related to Salmonella virulence, transports linearized enterobactin trimers, and its purpose may be to detoxify extracellular reactive oxygen species. Additionally, it has been reported that in Vibrio cholerae, the mutant lacking the RND efflux system VexGH has impaired the secretion of the catechol siderophore, vibriobactin (). These results highlight the native physiological function of drug efflux pumps and provide the possibility that more drug efflux pumps may be involved in siderophore efflux and iron metabolism in multiple bacterial species.
Roles of Multidrug Efflux Pumps in Exporting a Toxic Compound During Anaerobic Respiration
The E. coli genome contains approximately 20 drug efflux system genes (). However, the expression of most of these is usually suppressed under aerobic conditions, except for the tripartite system AcrAB-TolC. E. coli cells survive in the gut, an environment with a low oxygen concentration. However, the oxygen concentration was not previously known to affect the expression of drug efflux systems. For E. coli, we showed that the MdtEF drug efflux system expression is significantly induced under anaerobic conditions, and the accompanying rise in drug efflux activity leads to MDR (). Gene expression in E. coli under anaerobic and aerobic conditions is regulated by the ArcAB (anaerobic respiration control) two-component signal transduction system (TCS). The ArcA regulator recognizes a sequence upstream of the MdtEF genes. Quantitative analysis has shown that the induction of MdtEF expression under anaerobic conditions depends on ArcAB. Therefore, the expression of the MdtEF drug efflux system is regulated not by antibiotics, but by oxygen concentration changes, suggesting that this efflux system plays a physiological role in anaerobic environments. There is no difference in growth rate between the wild-type strain and an mdtEF-deletion strain under aerobic condition. However, under anaerobic condition, the mdtEF-deletion strain grew slower than the wild-type strain. Under anaerobic respiration, bacteria produce ATP using nitrate (NO3–) as the terminal electron acceptor instead of oxygen. In nitrate respiration, indole, an E. coli metabolite, is nitrosylated. As a result, indole derivatives such as indole red, with high toxicity, are produced during anaerobic respiration. Furthermore, we found that the expression of TnaA, an enzyme involved in indole synthesis from tryptophan, is promoted under anaerobic conditions. This causes a rise in cytosolic indole concentration compared with its production levels under aerobic growth conditions. In other words, in E. coli cells, anaerobic respiration results in the production of indole red, a highly toxic molecule, and consequently, the bacteria protect themselves from these toxic compounds by expressing MdtEF (Figure 5; ). Through that research, we elucidated the mechanisms of multidrug efflux pump expression induction and their physiological functions during anaerobic respiration.
FIGURE 5
Induction Mechanism of Multidrug Efflux Pumps by Antibiotics and Bile Acids
Many of multidrug efflux pumps have been identified. However, the signals which induce their expression are relatively less studied. During infection, Salmonella cells live under various toxic environmental conditions. In the gut, where Salmonella infections occur, indole (produced by intestinal bacteria) and bile acids (produced by the host) act as environmental signals. Additionally, antibiotics used for infection treatments impact bacterial survival. Therefore, it is important to understand how multidrug efflux pumps are used in bacteria and how drug resistance and pathogenicity are controlled. Thus, we investigated how Salmonella multidrug efflux pump expression is affected by antibiotics and metabolites present in the host environment. The results showed that compounds, such as antibiotics and bile acid, reduced the DNA-binding activity of the repressor RamR, and increased the activator RamA expression. This effect contributed to the induction of the expression of the efflux pump system genes acrAB (Figure 6; ; , ; , ). We solved the crystal structure of the RamR repressor, and used surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis to show that cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids (two of the main components of primary bile acids) bind to RamR, in addition to positively charged aromatic compounds with antimicrobial activity (such as dequalinium, berberine, crystal violet, ethidium bromide, and rhodamine 6G). We also determined the co-crystal structure of RamR with these compounds (Figures 7, 8; , ). We found that the various toxic compounds are recognized through multisite binding, by a combination of different amino acids in RamR. One common residue-interaction was the π–π interaction between Phe155 in RamR and the bonds in the aromatic rings in the positively charged compounds. This interaction plays a crucial role in recognizing of these compounds. However, Phe155, needed to recognize the five aromatic antibiotics, does not recognize cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid. Instead, hydrogen bonding with four amino acid residues (Try59, Thr85, Ser137, and Asp152) in RamR is crucial ().
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
These results showed us that Salmonella, an intestinal bacteria, senses bile acid components via the RamR protein, and increases RamA expression, which induces the expression of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump system. As AcrAB-TolC can expel bile acid from the cell, and the presence of bile acids controls its expression through bile-sensing regulator proteins, this mechanism is thought to be used in bile acid-rich environments, to which the cells have adapted. Also, E. coli expresses AcrAB-TolC to actively pump toxic compounds, including bile salts, from its environment. Furthermore, we have shown that non-intestinal bacteria, Haemophilus influenzae, intrinsically expresses an efflux pump (AcrAB-Hi), which could, besides exporting the same antibiotics as E. coli AcrAB, export bile salts only weakly (). Phylogenetic analysis showed that this pump is a relatively ancient efflux pump (Figure 9). These results further imply the adaptation of intestinal bacteria to bile-rich environments.
FIGURE 9
Regulatory Networks of Multidrug Efflux Pumps
Bacteria are known to respond to different environments via a two-component signal transduction system. This two-component system consists of an environmental sensor (histidine kinase) and an intracellular control factor (response regulator) (). The sensors detect any specific environmental signals, and the specific histidine residue is self-phosphorylated. This phosphate group is then transferred to the specific aspartic acid in the response regulator. The regulator mostly acts as a transcriptional regulator to control the expression of genes that have various activities regarding biological reactions (; ). Genome analysis revealed the existence of 30 varieties of two-component signal transduction systems encoded in the chromosomes of E. coli (). cloned all of the regulators of the two-component system in E. coli; then, the effects of the regulators on drug sensitivities of E. coli were tested. Results showed that 15 of the regulators were detected to be involved in the drug resistance (). Three two-component signal transduction systems, EvgSA, BaeSR, and CpxAR, are capable of inducing efflux pump expression, resulting in increased MDR. The EvgSA system induces the expression of the MdtEF pump and increasing the level of MDR (,). The BaeSR signal transduction system is activated through indole, copper or zinc, resulting in the induction of the two pumps, MdtABC and AcrD, making bacteria multidrug- and metal-resistant (; , ). The CpxAR system is a two-component signal transduction system that responds to membrane stress, and causes MDR. We found the overproduction of NlpE, an outer membrane lipoprotein functioning during envelope stress responses, increases multidrug and copper resistance by activating the genes encoding the AcrD and MdtABC multidrug efflux pumps ().
Although the expression of multidrug efflux pumps is activated by two-component signal transduction systems, they are also controlled by repressors. AcrR and AcrS repress the expression of acrAB (; ) in E. coli. EmrR is reported to be a repressor for the emrAB efflux genes (). CRP also represses the mdtEF genes (). The histone-like protein H-NS is a major component of the bacterial nucleoid and plays a crucial role in the global gene regulation of enteric bacteria (; ). It was found that H-NS represses the drug efflux genes, acrEF, mdtEF, and emrKY of E. coli (), and acrEF of Salmonella (). It was also found that small non-coding DsrA RNA modulates multidrug efflux through activation of genes encoding the MdtEF pump in E. coli (). It was shown that the RNA chaperone Hfq positively regulates the production of the AcrB drug efflux protein in E. coli () and Hfq also plays a role in Salmonella intrinsic acriflavine resistance, and the SmvA efflux pump is involved in this resistance ().
As described above, the AcrAB-TolC efflux system is effective in generating drug resistance and has wide substrate specificity. The expression of acrAB is subject to multiple levels of regulation. It is modulated locally by the repressor AcrR (). At a more global level, it is modulated by stress conditions and by regulators such as MarA, SoxS, and Rob (; ; , ; ; ). A study demonstrated that AcrAB is also positively regulated by SdiA, a protein that regulates cell division genes in a manner dependent upon quorum sensing (). suggested that drugs exported by pumps may resemble communication molecules normally exuded.
Structure of Drug Efflux Pump AcrB and Antibiotic Transport Mechanism
After the crystal structure of AcrAB-TolC component TolC from E. coli was obtained (), published the first crystal structure of and an RND-type transporter AcrB. This structure of AcrB was a symmetrical homotrimer with identical monomer conformations. However, in 2006, the co-crystal structure analysis with small molecular mass drugs, such as minocycline (molecular weight: 457 g mol–1) and doxorubicin (molecular weight: 544 g mol–1), showed these drugs bound to only one of the monomers in the homotrimer (this monomer was called the Binding monomer). These results showed that the three AcrB monomers had different conformations (). According to the structure, the three monomers were named the Access, Binding, and Extrusion monomer, and the cycling between these three states to transport drugs was proposed as the “functionally rotating mechanism” (Figure 10). reported the results of their co-crystal structure analysis of AcrB bound with large molecular mass drugs erythromycin (molecular weight: 734 g mol–1) and rifampicin (molecular weight: 823 g mol–1). Here, the structure of AcrB itself was virtually identical to that reported in 2006. However, there was major difference in the binding locations of the drugs. Minocycline and doxorubicin bound in a phenylalanine-rich pit in the Binding monomer, but rifampicin and erythromycin were bound at a location closer to the entrance of the pump in the Access monomer. These two distinct binding pockets were named the Distal Binding Pocket (DBP) and the Proximal Binding Pocket (PBP), respectively. They were separated by a short loop with Phe617 at its tip that existed between the pockets. We found that this loop swings widely during the transition from the Access to the Binding conformational states. Drugs, such as erythromycin, that bind to the PBP are thought to be transported to the DBP by a series of structural changes, including the swinging of the previously mentioned loop. Additionally, a highly flexible hinge, called the Hoising-loop, changes its conformation significantly during the transition to and from the Extrusion state (from a random coil in the Binding monomer, to an α-helix in the Extrusion monomer, and back to a random coil in the Access monomer) (; ). High molecular mass drugs temporarily bind to the Access monomer and later are transported to the DBP (during the transition to the Binding state). Finally, they are extruded from the exit by the extrusion monomer. We clarified the stepwise mechanism by which drugs are transported from the PBP to the DBP, and then to the exit. This extrusion of antibiotics from the cell has also been described as a peristaltic motion (; Figure 10). Besides the existence of multiple pockets and multisite binding to multiple antibiotics and toxic compounds, we have shown evidence for the existence of multiple entrance channels within the monomer of the AcrB efflux pump which contribute to the recognition of a wide range of structurally different compounds (, ; ; ).
FIGURE 10
Drug Efflux Pump Inhibition Mechanism
The inhibition of efflux pumps appears to be a promising strategy to restore antibacterial potency because active efflux of antibacterial agents plays a significant role in mediating drug resistance in bacteria (). One existing EPI is the pyridopyrimidine derivative ABI-PP. ABI-PP inhibits the function of MexB from P. aeruginosa, but cannot inhibit MexY (). MexY is another clinically relevant RND-type efflux pump known to be expressed in multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Partly because of this, ABI-PP is not clinically usable. Co-crystal structure analysis of ABI-PP with E. coli AcrB and P. aeruginosa MexB showed that, similar to the pump substrates minocycline and doxorubicin, ABI-PP is bound to the DBP in the Binding monomer. However, unlike the substrate drugs, ABI-PP is bound tightly into a narrow hydrophobic region that branches off from the pocket, indicating the existence of an inhibitor-binding pit (Figure 11; ). This phenomenon indicates that ABI-PP suppresses the functional rotational peristaltic motion of the pump by strongly binding to the hydrophobic pit that branches off from the DBP. One phenylalanine residue halfway into the AcrB and MexB inhibitor-binding pit (Phe178) is replaced by tryptophan in MexY (Trp177); an amino acid with a bulky side-chain. Homology modeling analysis showed that this large side-chain causes steric hindrance, implicating the reason ABI-PP is unable to bind to MexY. Using mutant variants suggests that minute steric hindrances determine the specific inhibition of ABI-PP in the binding pit (). These results help to the design of EPIs that will avoid steric hindrance, and develop universal EPIs that can inhibit various multidrug efflux pumps.
FIGURE 11
Conclusion
Bacterial drug efflux pumps are ideal targets for developing inhibitors (EPIs), and the research described in this review may help overcome MDR and help create reusable antibiotics. Furthermore, there are more studies on how multidrug efflux pumps contribute to physiological pathogenicity and biofilm formation. Hence, inhibitors may hold promise in reducing these phenomena as well. PAβN and ABI-PP are two representative inhibitors that have been reported. PAβN is not used clinically due to its toxicity to eukaryotic cells. Also, ABI-PP binds to the DBP and the hydrophobic domain that branches off from the DBP in AcrB in E. coli and MexB in P. aeruginosa. This binding of ABI-PP inhibits the functional rotation of some efflux pump, but cannot inhibit MexY-like pumps, which are highly expressed in multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Thus, this EPI is not clinically effective, either (). Multiple RND-type efflux pumps exist inside Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, it is thought that the development of a compound that can simultaneously inhibit the function of multiple major pumps (a universal inhibitor) is necessary for overcoming MDR. Understanding efflux pump structures and the pump mechanism (including the substrate recognition and drug-extrusion mechanisms) can help us to design more effective EPIs. In addition to PAβN and ABI-PP, there are many reports on EPIs from pharmaceutical companies and research groups (). However, they have not yet been used clinically. Inhibiting drug efflux pumps allows existing antimicrobial agents to accumulate more efficiently in bacterial cells, which is an effective approach to overcome bacterial resistance. However, the pharmacokinetics of the two compounds must be matched to use existing antimicrobial agents with pump inhibitors in treating infectious diseases. Therefore, it will be necessary to modify the compounds to match their pharmacokinetics. Additionally, because there are multiple pumps in a single bacterial cell, it is challenging to combat resistant bacteria by inhibiting only one pump, considering when multiple pumps are expressed simultaneously. Discovering the common point of multiple pumps for their function and developing inhibitors that target this point is necessary to overcome these problems. For example, in the case of the RND efflux system, since it functions by forming a complex, compounds that inhibit the complex formation might effectively inhibit the pump. In addition to the screening of small molecule compounds, it would be worthwhile to try methods, such as screening of peptide inhibitors or methods genetically preventing the expression of efflux pumps. In any case, if it becomes possible to inhibit the pump, bacteria become susceptible to various drugs, and developing more efficient inhibition methods will help overcome drug resistant bacterial infections.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
KN, MZ, and MH-N wrote the manuscript. KN, MZ, RN, and SY prepared the figures. KN edited the manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a research grant from the Takeda Science Foundation, Grants-in-Aid for Challenging Research (Exploratory) (18K19451), for Scientific Research (B) (21H03542), for Early-Career Scientists (20K16242 and 21K16318) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), the Center of Innovation Program (COI), Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) (JPMJCR20H9) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), International Joint Research Promotion Program of Osaka University, Research Program for CORE laboratory, Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices and Dynamic Alliance for Open Innovation Bridging Human, Environment and Materials from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT).
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our heartfelt thanks to all the collaborators.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Alcalde-RicoM.Hernando-AmadoS.BlancoP.MartinezJ. L. (2016). Multidrug Efflux Pumps at the Crossroad between Antibiotic Resistance and Bacterial Virulence.Front. Microbiol.7:1483. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01483
2
AlekshunM. N.LevyS. B. (1997). Regulation of chromosomally mediated multiple antibiotic resistance: the mar regulon.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.412067–2075. 10.1128/aac.41.10.2067
3
BaucheronS.CosteF.CanepaS.MaurelM. C.GiraudE.CulardF.et al (2012). Binding of the RamR repressor to wild-type and mutated promoters of the RamA gene involved in efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.56942–948. 10.1128/AAC.05444-11
4
BaucheronS.MoulineC.PraudK.Chaslus-DanclaE.CloeckaertA. (2005). TolC but not AcrB is essential for multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium colonization of chicks.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.55707–712. 10.1093/jac/dki091
5
BaucheronS.NishinoK.MonchauxI.CanepaS.MaurelM. C.CosteF.et al (2014). Bile-mediated activation of the acrAB and tolC multidrug efflux genes occurs mainly through transcriptional derepression of ramA in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.692400–2406. 10.1093/jac/dku140
6
BlairJ. M.RichmondG. E.PiddockL. J. (2014). Multidrug efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria and their role in antibiotic resistance.Future Microbiol.91165–1177.
7
BlochV.YangY.MargeatE.ChavanieuA.AugeM. T.RobertB.et al (2003). The H-NS dimerization domain defines a new fold contributing to DNA recognition.Nat. Struct. Biol.10212–218. 10.1038/nsb904
8
BogomolnayaL. M.TilvawalaR.ElfenbeinJ. R.CirilloJ. D.Andrews-PolymenisH. L. (2020). Linearized siderophore products secreted via MacAB efflux pump protect Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from oxidative stress.mBio11e528–e520. 10.1128/mBio.00528-20
9
BrownM. H.PaulsenI. T.SkurrayR. A. (1999). The multidrug efflux protein NorM is a prototype of a new family of transporters.Mol. Microbiol.31394–395. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01162.x
10
BuckleyA. M.WebberM. A.CoolesS.RandallL. P.La RagioneR. M.WoodwardM. J.et al (2006). The AcrAB-TolC efflux system of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium plays a role in pathogenesis.Cell Microbiol.8847–856. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00671.x
11
DavidsonA. L.ChenJ. (2004). ATP-binding cassette transporters in bacteria.Annu Rev. Biochem.73241–268.
12
FurrerJ. L.SandersD. N.Hook-BarnardI. G.McintoshM. A. (2002). Export of the siderophore enterobactin in Escherichia coli: involvement of a 43 kDa membrane exporter.Mol. Microbiol.441225–1234. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02885.x
13
GriffithsE. (1991). Iron and bacterial virulence–a brief overview.Biol. Met.47–13. 10.1007/BF01135551
14
HassanK. A.LiuQ.HendersonP. J.PaulsenI. T. (2015). Homologs of the Acinetobacter baumannii AceI transporter represent a new family of bacterial multidrug efflux systems.mBio6e1982–e1914. 10.1128/mBio.01982-14
15
Hayashi-NishinoM.FukushimaA.NishinoK. (2012). Impact of hfq on the intrinsic drug resistance of salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium.Front. Microbiol.3:205. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00205
16
HendersonP. J. F.MaherC.ElbourneL. D. H.EijkelkampB. A.PaulsenI. T.HassanK. A. (2021). Physiological functions of bacterial “Multidrug” efflux pumps.Chem. Rev.1215417–5478.
17
HirakataY.SrikumarR.PooleK.GotohN.SuematsuT.KohnoS.et al (2002). Multidrug efflux systems play an important role in the invasiveness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.J. Exp. Med.196109–118. 10.1084/jem.20020005
18
HirakawaH.NishinoK.HirataT.YamaguchiA. (2003). Comprehensive studies of drug resistance mediated by overexpression of response regulators of two-component signal transduction systems in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1851851–1856. 10.1128/JB.185.6.1851-1856.2003
19
HirakawaH.Takumi-KobayashiA.TheisenU.HirataT.NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2008). AcrS/EnvR represses expression of the acrAB multidrug efflux genes in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1906276–6279. 10.1128/JB.00190-08
20
HochJ. A. (2000). Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.3165–170.
21
HoriyamaT.NishinoK. (2014). AcrB, AcrD, and MdtABC multidrug efflux systems are involved in enterobactin export in Escherichia coli.PLoS One9:e108642. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108642
22
JacquetM.Cukier-KahnR.PlaJ.GrosF. (1971). A thermostable protein factor acting on in vitro DNA transcription.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.451597–1607. 10.1016/0006-291x(71)90204-x
23
JulianoR. L.LingV. (1976). A surface glycoprotein modulating drug permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants.Biochim. Biophys. Acta455152–162. 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90160-7
24
KobayashiN.NishinoK.HirataT.YamaguchiA. (2003). Membrane topology of ABC-type macrolide antibiotic exporter MacB in Escherichia coli.FEBS Lett.546241–246. 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00579-9
25
KobayashiN.NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2001). Novel macrolide-specific ABC-type efflux transporter in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1835639–5644. 10.1128/JB.183.19.5639-5644.2001
26
KornelsenV.KumarA. (2021). Update on multidrug resistance efflux pumps in Acinetobacter spp.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.65:e0051421. 10.1128/AAC.00514-21
27
KoronakisV.SharffA.KoronakisE.LuisiB.HughesC. (2000). Crystal structure of the bacterial membrane protein TolC central to multidrug efflux and protein export.Nature405914–919.
28
KunkleD. E.BinaX. R.BinaJ. E. (2017). The Vibrio cholerae VexGH RND efflux system maintains cellular homeostasis by effluxing vibriobactin.mBio8e126–e117. 10.1128/mBio.00126-17
29
LacroixF. J.CloeckaertA.GrepinetO.PinaultC.PopoffM. Y.WaxinH.et al (1996). Salmonella typhimurium acrB-like gene: identification and role in resistance to biliary salts and detergents and in murine infection.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.135161–167. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb07983.x
30
LawC. J.MaloneyP. C.WangD. N. (2008). Ins and outs of major facilitator superfamily antiporters.Annu Rev. Microbiol.62289–305. 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093329
31
LomovskayaO.LewisK. (1992). Emr, an Escherichia coli locus for multidrug resistance.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A898938–8942. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8938
32
LomovskayaO.LewisK.MatinA. (1995). EmrR is a negative regulator of the Escherichia coli multidrug resistance pump EmrAB.J. Bacteriol.1772328–2334. 10.1128/jb.177.9.2328-2334.1995
33
MaD.AlbertiM.LynchC.NikaidoH.HearstJ. E. (1996). The local repressor AcrR plays a modulating role in the regulation of acrAB genes of Escherichia coli by global stress signals.Mol. Microbiol.19101–112. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.357881.x
34
MaD.CookD. N.AlbertiM.PonN. G.NikaidoH.HearstJ. E. (1993). Molecular cloning and characterization of acrA and acrE genes of Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1756299–6313.
35
MartinR. G.RosnerJ. L. (2002). Genomics of the marA/soxS/rob regulon of Escherichia coli: identification of directly activated promoters by application of molecular genetics and informatics to microarray data.Mol. Microbiol.441611–1624. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02985.x
36
MartinR. G.RosnerJ. L. (2003). Analysis of microarray data for the marA, soxS, and rob regulons of Escherichia coli.Methods Enzymol.370278–280.
37
MizunoT. (1997). Compilation of all genes encoding two-component phosphotransfer signal transducers in the genome of Escherichia coli.DNA Res.4161–168. 10.1093/dnares/4.2.161
38
MurakamiS.NakashimaR.YamashitaE.MatsumotoT.YamaguchiA. (2006). Crystal structures of a multidrug transporter reveal a functionally rotating mechanism.Nature443173–179.
39
MurakamiS.NakashimaR.YamashitaE.YamaguchiA. (2002). Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB.Nature419587–593.
40
NagakuboS.NishinoK.HirataT.YamaguchiA. (2002). The putative response regulator BaeR stimulates multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli via a novel multidrug exporter system.MdtABC. J. Bacteriol.1844161–4167. 10.1128/JB.184.15.4161-4167.2002
41
NakamuraH. (1968). Genetic determination of resistance to acriflavine, phenethyl alcohol, and sodium dodecyl sulfate in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.96987–996. 10.1128/jb.96.4.987-996.1968
42
NakashimaR.SakuraiK.YamasakiS.HayashiK.NagataC.HoshinoK.et al (2013). Structural basis for the inhibition of bacterial multidrug exporters.Nature500102–106.
43
NakashimaR.SakuraiK.YamasakiS.NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2011). Structures of the multidrug exporter AcrB reveal a proximal multisite drug-binding pocket.Nature480565–569. 10.1038/nature10641
44
NikaidoE.YamaguchiA.NishinoK. (2008). AcrAB multidrug efflux pump regulation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by RamA in response to environmental signals.J. Biol. Chem.28324245–24253. 10.1074/jbc.M804544200
45
NikaidoH. (1996). Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria.J. Bacteriol.1785853–5859.
46
NishinoK.HondaT.YamaguchiA. (2005). Genome-wide analyses of Escherichia coli gene expression responsive to the BaeSR two-component regulatory system.J. Bacteriol.1871763–1772. 10.1128/JB.187.5.1763-1772.2005
47
NishinoK.LatifiT.GroismanE. A. (2006b). Virulence and drug resistance roles of multidrug efflux systems of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.Mol. Microbiol.59126–141. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04940.x
48
NishinoK.HsuF. F.TurkJ.CromieM. J.WöstenM. M.GroismanE. A. (2006a). Identification of the lipopolysaccharide modifications controlled by the Salmonella PmrA/PmrB system mediating resistance to Fe(III) and Al(III).Mol. Microbiol.61645–654. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05273.x
49
NishinoK.NikaidoE.YamaguchiA. (2007). Regulation of multidrug efflux systems involved in multidrug and metal resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.J. Bacteriol.1899066–9075. 10.1128/JB.01045-07
50
NishinoK.SendaY.YamaguchiA. (2008). CRP regulator modulates multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli by repressing the mdtEF multidrug efflux genes.J. Antibiot.61120–127. 10.1038/ja.2008.120
51
NishinoK.Hayashi-NishinoM.YamaguchiA. (2009a). H-NS modulates multidrug resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by repressing multidrug efflux genes acrEF.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.533541–3543. 10.1128/AAC.00371-09
52
NishinoK.NikaidoE.YamaguchiA. (2009b). Regulation and physiological function of multidrug efflux pumps in Escherichia coli and Salmonella.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1794834–843. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.02.002
53
NishinoK.YamadaJ.HirakawaH.HirataT.YamaguchiA. (2003). Roles of TolC-dependent multidrug transporters of Escherichia coli in resistance to β-lactams.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.473030–3033. 10.1128/aac.47.9.3030-3033.2003
54
NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2001a). Analysis of a complete library of putative drug transporter genes in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1835803–5812. 10.1128/JB.183.20.5803-5812.2001
55
NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2001b). Overexpression of the response regulator evgA of the two-component signal transduction system modulates multidrug resistance conferred by multidrug resistance transporters.J. Bacteriol.1831455–1458. 10.1128/JB.183.4.1455-1458.2001
56
NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2002). EvgA of the two-component signal transduction system modulates production of the yhiUV multidrug transporter in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1842319–2323. 10.1128/JB.184.8.2319-2323.2002
57
NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2004). Role of histone-like protein H-NS in multidrug resistance of Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1861423–1429. 10.1128/JB.186.5.1423-1429.2004
58
NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2008). Role of xenobiotic transporters in bacterial drug resistance and virulence.IUBMB Life60569–574. 10.1002/iub.90
59
NishinoK.YamasakiS.Hayashi-NishinoM.YamaguchiA. (2010). Effect of NlpE overproduction on multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.542239–2243. 10.1128/AAC.01677-09
60
NishinoK.YamasakiS.Hayashi-NishinoM.YamaguchiA. (2011). Effect of overexpression of small non-coding DsrA RNA on multidrug efflux in Escherichia coli.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.66291–296. 10.1093/jac/dkq420
61
O’BrienI. G.GibsonF. (1970). The structure of enterochelin and related 2,3-dihydroxy-N-benzoylserine conjugates from Escherichia coli.Biochim. Biophys. Acta215393–402. 10.1016/0304-4165(70)90038-3
62
OmoteH.HiasaM.MatsumotoT.OtsukaM.MoriyamaY. (2006). The MATE proteins as fundamental transporters of metabolic and xenobiotic organic cations.Trends Pharmacol. Sci.27587–593. 10.1016/j.tips.2006.09.001
63
PaulsenI. T.NguyenL.SliwinskiM. K.RabusR.SaierM. H.Jr. (2000). Microbial genome analyses: comparative transport capabilities in eighteen prokaryotes.J. Mol. Biol.30175–100. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3961
64
PaulsenI. T.SkurrayR. A.TamR.SaierM. H.Jr.TurnerR. J.WeinerJ. H.et al (1996). The SMR family: a novel family of multidrug efflux proteins involved with the efflux of lipophilic drugs.Mol. Microbiol.191167–1175. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02462.x
65
PerezA.PozaM.FernandezA.Fernandez MdelC.MalloS.MerinoM.et al (2012). Involvement of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump in the resistance, fitness, and virulence of Enterobacter cloacae.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.562084–2090. 10.1128/AAC.05509-11
66
PollackJ. R.NeilandsJ. B. (1970). Enterobactin, an iron transport compound from Salmonella typhimurium.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.38989–992. 10.1016/0006-291x(70)90819-3
67
PooleK.KrebesK.McnallyC.NeshatS. (1993). Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon.J. Bacteriol.1757363–7372. 10.1128/jb.175.22.7363-7372.1993
68
PutmanM.Van VeenH. W.KoningsW. N. (2000). Molecular properties of bacterial multidrug transporters.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.64672–693. 10.1128/mmbr.64.4.672-693.2000
69
RahmatiS.YangS.DavidsonA. L.ZechiedrichE. L. (2002). Control of the AcrAB multidrug efflux pump by quorum-sensing regulator SdiA.Mol. Microbiol.43677–685. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02773.x
70
RandallL. P.WoodwardM. J. (2002). The multiple antibiotic resistance (mar) locus and its significance.Res. Vet. Sci.7287–93. 10.1053/rvsc.2001.0537
71
RosenbergE. Y.BertenthalD.NillesM. L.BertrandK. P.NikaidoH. (2003). Bile salts and fatty acids induce the expression of Escherichia coli AcrAB multidrug efflux pump through their interaction with Rob regulatory protein.Mol. Microbiol.481609–1619. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03531.x
72
SeegerM. A.SchiefnerA.EicherT.VerreyF.DiederichsK.PosK. M. (2006). Structural asymmetry of AcrB trimer suggests a peristaltic pump mechanism.Science3131295–1298. 10.1126/science.1131542
73
SongS.LeeB.YeomJ. H.HwangS.KangI.ChoJ. C.et al (2015). MdsABC-mediated pathway for pathogenicity in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.Infect. Immun.834266–4276. 10.1128/IAI.00653-15
74
StoneB. J.MillerV. L. (1995). Salmonella enteritidis has a homologue of tolC that is required for virulence in BALB/c mice.Mol. Microbiol.17701–712. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17040701.x
75
UedaK.ClarkD. P.ChenC. J.RoninsonI. B.GottesmanM. M.PastanI. (1987). The human multidrug resistance (mdr1) gene. cDNA cloning and transcription initiation.J. Biol. Chem.262505–508.
76
VillagraN. A.HidalgoA. A.SantiviagoC. A.SaavedraC. P.MoraG. C. (2008). SmvA, and not AcrB, is the major efflux pump for acriflavine and related compounds in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.621273–1276. 10.1093/jac/dkn407
77
WangY.VenterH.MaS. (2016). Efflux pump inhibitors: A novel approach to combat efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria.Curr. Drug Targets17702–719. 10.2174/1389450116666151001103948
78
Wang-KanX.BlairJ. M. A.ChirulloB.BettsJ.La RagioneR. M.IvensA.et al (2017). Lack of AcrB efflux function confers loss of virulence on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.mBio8e968–e917. 10.1128/mBio.00968-17
79
WhiteD. G.GoldmanJ. D.DempleB.LevyS. B. (1997). Role of the acrAB locus in organic solvent tolerance mediated by expression of marA, soxS, or robA in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1796122–6126.
80
YamadaJ.YamasakiS.HirakawaH.Hayashi-NishinoM.YamaguchiA.NishinoK. (2010). Impact of the RNA chaperone Hfq on multidrug resistance in Escherichia coli.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.65853–858. 10.1093/jac/dkq067
81
YamasakiS.FujiokaT.HayashiK.YamasakiS.Hayashi-NishinoM.NishinoK. (2016). Phenotype microarray analysis of the drug efflux systems in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.J. Infect. Chemother.22780–784. 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.03.015
82
YamasakiS.NakashimaR.SakuraiK.BaucheronS.GiraudE.DoubletB.et al (2019). Crystal structure of the multidrug resistance regulator RamR complexed with bile acids.Sci. Rep.9:177. 10.1038/s41598-018-36025-8
83
YamasakiS.NikaidoE.NakashimaR.SakuraiK.FujiwaraD.FujiiI.et al (2013). The crystal structure of multidrug-resistance regulator RamR with multiple drugs.Nat. Commun.4:2078.
84
YangS.LopezC. R.ZechiedrichE. L. (2006). Quorum sensing and multidrug transporters in Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A1032386–2391. 10.1073/pnas.0502890102
85
ZgurskayaH. I.NikaidoH. (2000). Multidrug resistance mechanisms: drug efflux across two membranes.Mol. Microbiol.37219–225. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01926.x
86
ZhangY.XiaoM.HoriyamaT.ZhangY.LiX.NishinoK.et al (2011). The multidrug efflux pump MdtEF protects against nitrosative damage during the anaerobic respiration in Escherichia coli.J. Biol. Chem.28626576–26584. 10.1074/jbc.M111.243261
87
ZwamaM.HayashiK.SakuraiK.NakashimaR.KitagawaK.NishinoK.et al (2017). Hoisting-loop in bacterial multidrug exporter AcrB is a highly flexible hinge that enables the large motion of the subdomains.Front. Microbiol.8:2095. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02095
88
ZwamaM.YamaguchiA. (2018). Molecular mechanisms of AcrB-mediated multidrug export.Res. Microbiol.169372–383. 10.1016/j.resmic.2018.05.005
89
ZwamaM.YamaguchiA.NishinoK. (2019). Phylogenetic and functional characterisation of the Haemophilus influenzae multidrug efflux pump AcrB.Commun. Biol.2:340. 10.1038/s42003-019-0564-6
90
ZwamaM.YamasakiS.NakashimaR.SakuraiK.NishinoK.YamaguchiA. (2018). Multiple entry pathways within the efflux transporter AcrB contribute to multidrug recognition.Nat. Commun.9:124. 10.1038/s41467-017-02493-1
91
ZwirI.ShinD.KatoA.NishinoK.LatifiT.SolomonF.et al (2005). Dissecting the PhoP regulatory network of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A1022862–2867. 10.1073/pnas.0408238102
Summary
Keywords
inhibitor, regulation, drug resistance, Gram-negative bacteria, multidrug efflux pumps
Citation
Nishino K, Yamasaki S, Nakashima R, Zwama M and Hayashi-Nishino M (2021) Function and Inhibitory Mechanisms of Multidrug Efflux Pumps. Front. Microbiol. 12:737288. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.737288
Received
06 July 2021
Accepted
14 October 2021
Published
03 December 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Hidetada Hirakawa, Gunma University, Japan
Reviewed by
Aixin Yan, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Sujeet Kumar, The Ohio State University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Nishino, Yamasaki, Nakashima, Zwama and Hayashi-Nishino.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kunihiko Nishino, nishino@sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp
This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.