Abstract
Neutrophils are innate immune cells that play an essential role during the clearance of pathogens that can release chromatin structures coated by several cytoplasmatic and granular antibacterial proteins, called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). These supra-molecular structures are produced to kill or immobilize several types of microorganisms, including bacteria and viruses. The contribution of the NET release process (or NETosis) to acute inflammation or the prevention of pathogen spreading depends on the specific microorganism involved in triggering this response. Furthermore, studies highlight the role of innate cells different from neutrophils in triggering the release of extracellular traps during bacterial infection. This review summarizes the contribution of NETs during bacterial and viral infections, explaining the molecular mechanisms involved in their formation and the relationship with different components of such pathogens.
Introduction
Neutrophils, a type of polymorphonuclear cell, are one of the most abundant immune cells in the blood of humans, which increase upon infection with various microbial agents. Neutrophil precursors derived from the bone marrow enter the circulation and are recruited to the infected tissue, where they become fully activated. Activated neutrophils display multi-lobulated nuclei and produce many antimicrobial proteins, different types of granules and reactive chemical species. In addition, these cells present a wide variety of receptors as Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that recognize an array of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). These interactions would enable the recognition of extracellular or intracellular pathogens to trigger responses to clear them (Segal, 2005; Thomas and Schroder, 2013). Furthermore, neutrophils have different mechanisms to develop an efficient bacterial killing, such as phagocytosis, NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS), degranulation of cytotoxic components, and antimicrobial peptides (Segal, 2005; Teng et al., 2017). Neutrophils can also release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) during microbial infection, a standard mechanism to prevent pathogen spreading during infectious diseases. This review summarizes the current knowledge relative to the mechanism of NET formation during bacterial and viral infections. Furthermore, we also discuss the role of extracellular traps released by other cells, different from neutrophils, which are produced during bacterial infections.
Neutrophils Extracellular Traps and Netosis
Initial observations described that activated neutrophils were able to generate prominent extracellular structures composed of nuclear chromatin, histones, granular proteins such as neutrophil elastase (NE), myeloperoxidase (MPO), or cathepsin-G, and cytoplasmic proteins such as glycolytic enzymes and catalase, among others (; Urban et al., 2009). Further studies supported the role of NETs as elements able to capture, entrap and kill pathogenic microorganisms (; Papayannopoulos and Zychlinsky, 2009; Pilsczek et al., 2010; Kenny et al., 2017). Roughly, the NETs process begins with the recognition of the microorganism, which activates the NET pathway and allows the disruption of the nuclear and granular membrane, as well as the release of decondensed nuclear DNA into the cytoplasm. This decondensed chromatin mixes with nuclear, granular, and cytoplasmic content and the process ends with the disruption of the plasma membrane and the release of the lattice structure (Fuchs et al., 2007). The cell death process generated by the release of NETs has been denominated NETosis, which is different from other cell death processes described so far. For instance, it is different from apoptosis because it is caspase-independent and no DNA fragmentation is observed, which are hallmarks of the apoptotic process (Fuchs et al., 2007). It is also different from necrosis, because NETosis results in the fragmentation of the nuclear envelopment, which allows the formation of multiple vesicles that mix with the cytoplasm content, a process that does not happen during necrosis (Fuchs et al., 2007). Therefore, NETosis seems to be an innate immune mechanism used to control pathogen spreading by entrapping microorganisms and placing them in direct contact with a high amount of cell-derived antimicrobial molecules (Papayannopoulos and Zychlinsky, 2009). Initially, the release of NETs was thought to be related to the size of the pathogen, because one study shown that small microorganisms, such as single bacteria and unicellular yeast, do not induce NETosis and that the phagocytosis of these unicellular microbes inhibits the release of NETs by sequestering NE (). However, now it is known that NETs release takes place against fungus (Urban et al., 2005), protozoan (Guimarães-Costa et al., 2009), viruses (Souza et al., 2018), and bacteria (; ). Furthermore, NETs release could be triggered by extracellular or intracellular pathogens () and, in some cases, the pathogen can generate a vital NETs release, in which the cell continues engulfing the microorganism (Yipp et al., 2012).
Although the function of NETs during microbial infection has a relevant role in pathogen control, it has been described that the overproduction of NETs is also related to tissue damage in several diseases, as such arthritis (Khandpur et al., 2013; Sur Chowdhury et al., 2014), allergies (; Hu et al., 2016; Toussaint et al., 2017), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (Kessenbrock et al., 2009; Knight et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015), and cancer (; Razak et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021). In the case of inflammatory diseases, it is possible that deficiencies in the mechanisms that prevent excessive tissue damage caused by NETs release are involved in their onset and progression. One of these regulatory mechanisms has been described in M1 macrophages, which degrade DNA in a caspase-activated dependent manner within 24 h post-activation (Nakazawa et al., 2016). Also, it has been described that monocytes-derived macrophages engulf the NETs, a process facilitated by DNase I and opsonization by C1q, without the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines after the ingestion (Farrera and Fadeel, 2013).
Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Induction and Signaling
Neutrophil extracellular traps release was described initially in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (; Hakkim et al., 2011). However, further studies have shown that diverse stimuli trigger NETs, such as platelet expressing TLR4 (; ), PAMPs recognition by toll-like receptors (TLR), such as TLR2 (), TLR4 (Funchal et al., 2015), TLR7 (Hiroki et al., 2019), and TLR8 (Lood et al., 2017); calcium ionophores (Pilsczek et al., 2010; Douda et al., 2015), uric acid (), high levels of glucose (Wong et al., 2015; Stoikou et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018), autoantibodies (Kessenbrock et al., 2009), and interferon (IFN) (Martinelli et al., 2004).
The classical (or suicidal) NETs release, which is activated primarily by PMA, occurs after 3–4 h of stimulation, with the accompanying death of the cell (lytic NETosis). In physiological conditions, the process begins with the recognition of PAMPs or DAMPs by TLR, by receptors of complement system, by Fc-receptors (FcγRIIa and FcγRIIIb) () or by cytokines (; Garcia-Romo et al., 2011). Then, the Protein Kinase C (PKC) is activated, allowing the activation of the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway and the phosphorylation of a subunit of the NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2) (Hakkim et al., 2011). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NOX2 act on the azurophilic granules to release the NE to the cytosol, in a process that requires the function of MPO (Metzler et al., 2014). ROS are also involved in the translocation of NE to the nucleus, promoting the decondensation of chromatin (Papayannopoulos et al., 2010; Metzler et al., 2014). This effect occurs in conjunction with the action of the Peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), an enzyme that citrullinate the histone H3 (Li et al., 2010) and allows NETs release in a process known as NOX2-dependent NETosis (Li et al., 2010). Further, the activity of PAD4 on NETs release is essential for an efficient DNA decondensation, the rupture of the NE granule, the nuclear DNA release into the cytoplasm, and the extracellular NETs release (Thiam et al., 2020).
There is also a NOX2-independent type of NETs release, also known as vital NETosis. This process could be triggered by recognition of LPS by PRRs as TLRs (Pilsczek et al., 2010; Yipp et al., 2012). As soon as 10 min after activation, the extrusion of vesicles loaded with nuclear DNA occurs, without breaking the plasma membrane, with minimal cell lysis and no ROS production (Pilsczek et al., 2010; ). The anuclear granulocytes generated -either cytoplasts or motile cytokineplasts- due to vital NETosis retain antimicrobial mechanisms as phagocytosis, transmigration, and chemotaxis (Malawista et al., 1989, 2006). Furthermore, the anuclear neutrophils derived from this process, which are close to 10% of total neutrophils undergoing NETosis, contain intracellular bacteria due to intact plasma membrane and maintain an active phagolysosome, implying that NETs release and phagocytosis can work simultaneously and independently (Yipp et al., 2012). The importance of vital NETs release is that the cell still contributes to the antibacterial mechanisms (Pilsczek et al., 2010; Yipp et al., 2012). However, it is still unknown how long last and how functional these anuclear cells are. Another type of NETs release that retains the survival of the cell is described in neutrophils primed with GM-CSF and stimulated with LPS or with complement components such as C5a, which induce mitochondrial DNA release, a rapid process that depend on ROS (Yousefi et al., 2009; McIlroy et al., 2014). This type of NETs release by viable neutrophils requires glycolytic ATP production for rearrangements of the microtubule network and F-actin ().
Also, NETs release is induced by calcium ionophore or ionomycin, which induce a faster NETs release than the classical NOX2-dependent NETs release and independent of ERK activation (Douda et al., 2015). However, this pathway requires the calcium-activated potassium channel of small conductance 3 (SK channel), which activates mitochondrial ROS production (Douda et al., 2015). In consequence, this process induces the opening of the non-selective mitochondrial permeability transition pore, which results in the accumulation of mitochondrial ROS that causes the activation of NOX2 (Vorobjeva, 2020). Using human neutrophils from healthy controls or from patients with the chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), which lacks NADPH Oxidase, it was demonstrated that NET release can indeed be induced by mitochondrial ROS production (Vorobjeva, 2020).
The last NETs release induction pathway identified so far is mediated by cytosolic LPS derived from intracellular Gram-negative pathogens, such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (). This stimulus activates the non-canonical inflammasome, which is a caspase-11-dependent pathway, and triggers the neutrophil gasdermin-D (GSDM-D)-dependent death (). In this case, the action of ROS or PAD4 is not required, because GSDM-D can directly generate pores in the nuclear and plasma membranes ().
It is essential to mention that not all stimuli activate the specific proteins discussed above. Although five different stimuli induce NETs production, killed bacteria and degraded proteins activate different pathways as compared to NOX2-dependent NETosis (Kenny et al., 2017). For instance, Candida albicans and group B of Streptococcus (GBS) induce NETs independently of histone citrullination mediated by PAD4 (Kenny et al., 2017; Guiducci et al., 2018). In another study, Leishmania amazonensis induced both types of NETs release: the classical NOX2-dependent NETosis (which is dependent on the action of PAD4, but independent of MPO) and the early/rapid NETosis (which is ROS and NE-independent, but dependent on the activity of PAD4) (Rochael et al., 2015). All these studies suggest that the NETosis process is not activated just by one or two pathways but depends on the nature of the stimulus and can be very diverse in terms of activation.
It has been described that other factors produced due to the host immune response activation can also induce NETs during a bacterial infection. As an example, it has been described that platelets can recognize Gram-negative and -positive bacteria and other stimuli through TLR-4, inducing the adhesion to neutrophil and NETs release (). Accordingly, elimination of platelets or the inhibition of TLR4 expressed by platelets substantially reduces NETs release (). The importance of platelets is observed when the bacteria induce virulence factors that promote apoptosis of these cells, causing thrombocytopenia and generating a more severe infection that affects the immune response of the neutrophils (Kraemer et al., 2012). Other factors produced during immune response activation that cause NETs release in a ROS- dependent manner are of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-1β, or IL-8 (Keshari et al., 2012) and macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) secreted by red blood cells during Plasmodium infection, which induce NETosis in a C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) dependent manner (Rodrigues et al., 2020).
Other Immune Cells That Produce Extracellular Traps
Although NETs are the most studied Extracellular Traps (ET), other immune cells are also able to produce this kind of structures, such as eosinophils (Ueki et al., 2013), basophils (Yousefi et al., 2015), macrophages (), and mast cells (Naqvi et al., 2017).
Eosinophils Extracellular Traps
Eosinophils extracellular traps (EETs) are released similarly to NETs. They are triggered due to activation by bacteria (Yousefi et al., 2008; Gevaert et al., 2017), fungi (Muniz et al., 2018; Omokawa et al., 2018), and by PMA and calcium ionophore stimulation (Ueki et al., 2013, 2016). In addition, it has been described that EETs contain entire eosinophil granules and granule-derived proteins (Mukherjee et al., 2018). Furthermore, mitochondrial DNA-derived EETs has also been reported in response to LPS stimulation on previously primed cells in in vitro experiments, which did not involve cell death (Yousefi et al., 2008). However, other studies have shown that EETs can also be produced by nuclear DNA, and ROS production dependent on NOX activation, in a similar pathway to the lytic NETosis (Ueki et al., 2013). The presence of EETs has been reported during allergies (Dworski et al., 2011), respiratory tract disease (; Ueki et al., 2016; Echevarría et al., 2017), and skin disease (Simon et al., 2011; Morshed et al., 2012).
Basophils Extracellular Traps
The release of basophils extracellular traps (BETs) has not been deeply studied. However, it has been observed in activated cells in response to Gram-positive (Morshed et al., 2014) and -negative bacteria (Yousefi et al., 2015). It has been described that ETs derived from mice or human basophils have the capacity to entrap Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (Yousefi et al., 2015), equivalent to NETs (). Another in vitro study performed in basophils derived from mice and humans reported that BETs are released in a mitochondrial ROS-dependent manner, without activation of NOX, and are also composed of mitochondrial DNA (Yousefi et al., 2015). This process can take place as rapidly as 5 min post-stimulation (Yousefi et al., 2008) with the concomitant cell survival of human and mouse primed basophils (Morshed et al., 2014). Lastly, BETs release was reported in vivo studies during N. brasiliensis infection in mice and inflammatory skin diseases in the human epidermis (Morshed et al., 2014).
Macrophages and Monocytes Extracellular Traps
Macrophages and monocyte extracellular traps (METs) have been studied in different types of cells, such as RAW264.7, human alveolar macrophage, murine peritoneal macrophages, and bovine monocytes (; ). Experiments performed in in vitro and in vivo models have described that TNF-α is an inducer of ETs in RAW264.7 macrophages. The concomitant presence of citrullinated histones suggests that ETosis in macrophages is mediated by PAD-2 (Mohanan et al., 2013). Various distinct stimuli can induce METs, including Gram-negative (Webster et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2014) and -positive bacteria (; Hellenbrand et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2016), parasites (Muñoz-Caro et al., 2014; Reichel et al., 2015), fungi (Liu et al., 2014; Halder et al., 2017; Loureiro et al., 2019), PMA (), and TNF-α (Mohanan et al., 2013), leading to cell death. Monocyte-derived macrophages from human peripheral blood have also been described to release METs after the stimulation with IFN-γ during infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Wong and Jacobs, 2013). Escherichia coli also induces the release of METs, composed of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, histones, MPO, and lysozyme (Liu et al., 2014), independently of ROS production by NOX (Liu et al., 2014). Like NETs, METs can be produced by different molecular pathways, dependent or independent of ROS and caspase-1, in human monocytes derived from peripheral blood when infected with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae infection (Webster et al., 2010). METs have been also observed in bone marrow-derived macrophage and J774A.1 macrophages infected with a mutant strain of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, showing that METs can kill and entrap at least 10% of the initial inoculum (Mónaco et al., 2021). However, more studies are necessary to determine the different pathways that induce METs release and to identify similarities between NETs and METs, because the ETs from macrophages depends on the specie, the state of differentiation, microenvironment, and state polarization ().
Mast Cells Extracellular Traps
The release of mast cells extracellular traps (MCETs) was first described in response to PMA, with ROS production by NOX (Von Köckritz-Blickwede et al., 2008; ). MCETs are composed of nuclear DNA, histones, and granular proteins, such as tryptase and cathelicidin AMP LL-37 (), which suggest that MCETs and NETs are produced in a similar manner (Von Köckritz-Blickwede et al., 2008). It has been shown that although mast cells cannot phagocytose Streptococcus pyogenes, the release of MCETs allows the growth inhibition of the bacteria (Von Köckritz-Blickwede et al., 2008). Furthermore, heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis can induce the release of MCETs after 2 h of stimulation; however, the live pathogen can modulate the release of these ETs (). MCETs are released in a ROS-dependent manner in the case of Listeria monocytogenes ().
Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap During Bacterial Infection
The contribution of NETs during bacterial infection is not completely clear. It was initially thought that it promoted the clearance of bacteria by facilitating the entrapping and killing of these pathogens (Riyapa et al., 2012). However, NETs release has a bacteriostatic rather than a bactericidal effect because it mainly affects the growth of the bacteria and eventually could aid the killing (Menegazzi et al., 2012). Nevertheless, the DNA exerts antimicrobial properties by cation chelation and the disruption of the cell membrane (Halverson et al., 2015). Furthermore, experiments in primary human neutrophils showed that NETs could entrap bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), without killing them but affecting the ability of the complement to kill them (). Also, the condition in which the NETs are produced affects the antimicrobial properties, observing that NETs in static conditions present fewer killing abilities than the NETs released in dynamic conditions ().
On the other hand, NETs release could result in collateral effects due to the production of antimicrobial components that can lead to exacerbated inflammation, causing tissue damage (Xu et al., 2009). However, it has been described that the granular proteins with bactericidal activities released within the NET act mainly as a regulator of inflammation due to the action on different cytokines, rather than as a bactericidal mechanisms ().
Notably, while almost all bacteria can induce ETs, several microorganisms have evolved molecular strategies to inhibit this host mechanism of defense to promote microbial proliferation and dissemination (Malachowa et al., 2013; Seper et al., 2013; Storisteanu et al., 2017). Evasion strategies can be due to the inhibition of NET release by down-regulating host inflammatory responses, the degradation of NETs using pathogen-derived DNases, and/or by the resistance to the microbicidal components of NETs (Halverson et al., 2015; Storisteanu et al., 2017; Figure 1). In this section, we will review some examples of virulence factors that induce the NETs, which can favor or not the clearance, and some evasion strategies used to avoid the antimicrobial mechanisms and, in some cases, take advantage of this immune response. These evasion mechanisms have been summarized in Table 1.
FIGURE 1
TABLE 1
| NET inhibition | Type of inhibition of NET function | References | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Dnase (eddB), phosphatase (eddA) | 2 | Rada et al., 2013; Wilton et al., 2018 |
| Biofilm formation | 3 | Thanabalasuriar et al., 2019 | |
| Pyocyanin | 1 | Rada et al., 2013 | |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Probably the level of lipids of it envelops | 3 | Liu et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020 |
| ESAT-6 protein by the ESX-1 type | 1 | Francis et al., 2014 | |
| Staphylococcus aureus | Biofilm formation | 3 | Malachowa et al., 2013; |
| Eap, DNA binding protein, Nuc, adenosin synthase | 2 | ; Thammavongsa et al., 2013; Eisenbeis et al., 2018 | |
| Leukotoxin GH | 1 | Malachowa et al., 2013 | |
| Bordetella spp. | ACT and CyaA | 1 | Eby et al., 2014; Gorgojo et al., 2017 |
| Streptococcus spp. | Sda1 | 3 | Lauth et al., 2009; ; Moon et al., 2016 |
| SpnA | 3 | ||
| endA | 3 | ; Zhu et al., 2013 | |
| Capsule | 3 | Wartha et al., 2007 | |
| dlt operon | 3 | Wartha et al., 2007 | |
| Streptolysin O | 1 | Uchiyama et al., 2015 | |
| M1 toxin | 1 | Lauth et al., 2009 | |
| Yersinia enterocolitica | Nuclease | 2 | Möllerherm et al., 2015 |
| Vibrio cholerae | Dns and Xds | 2 | Seper et al., 2013 |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | Mpn491 | 2 | Yamamoto et al., 2017 |
| Neisseria meningitidis | Nuc | 2 | Lappann et al., 2013 |
| Phosphoethanolamine transferase | 3 | Lappann et al., 2013 | |
| ZnuD | 2 | Lappann et al., 2013 | |
| SOMVs | 3 | Lappann et al., 2013 | |
| Burkholderia pseudomallei | TTSS and capsule polysaccharide I | 1 | Riyapa et al., 2012 |
Virulence factors that interfere with NET function during bacterial infection.
Inhibition of NET release by down regulating the host inflammatory response1; Degradation of NETs using pathogen derived DNases2; Bacterial virulence factors that evade NETs3.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an encapsulated, Gram-negative bacterium associated with severe illnesses in healthy and individuals with comorbidities and an important cause of nosocomial infection in cystic fibrosis patients (). Pyocyanin, a redox-active pigment secreted to the airways by the biofilm, is associated with an increase in oxidative stress and the inflammation generated during the disease (Rada et al., 2013). Also, this virulence factors increases the induction of NETs by the NOX2-dependent pathway (Rada et al., 2013). However, NETs extrusion does not have any effect in entrapping or killing the bacteria but in decreasing the functionality of the lungs and increasing the inflammatory conditions found in patients with cystic fibrosis (Rada et al., 2013).
The sputum of cystic fibrosis patients presents a large amount of DNA because neutrophils is one of the main types of immune cells recruited to the airways and the NETs release by these cells allow the characteristic sputum’s mucus structure (Manzenreiter, 2012). In this sense, it has been observed that the concentration of extracellular DNA in the sputum generate the lysis of the bacteria (Halverson et al., 2015). However, P. aeruginosa contains virulence factors that allow the degradation of the NETs structure, which involves an operon encoding two DNA-modifying type II secreted enzymes: a DNase (eddB) and a phosphatase (eddA) (Wilton et al., 2018). These two enzymes work together at degrading the extracellular DNA: the phosphatase acts on the phosphodiester backbone of the DNA, removing the phosphates and altering the function, but no the structure of the DNA (neutralizes its cation-chelating, antimicrobial activity), while the DNase disassembles the NETs and promotes bacterial survival (Wilton et al., 2018). This allows the bacteria to tolerate the ETs produced by the neutrophils, in addition to the formation of the biofilms that avoid the NETs antimicrobial function. This role of the NETs in the consistency of the sputum has led to the evaluation of rhDNases used as treatment (Guichard et al., 2018).
In cystic fibrosis patients, P. aeruginosa can produce keratitis caused by a biofilm formed in the outer eye surface (Saraswathi and Beuerman, 2015; Naimie et al., 2016). In a mice model of keratitis caused by P. aeruginosa, it was observed that the Type Three Secretion System (TTSS) and the bacterial Psl exopolysaccharide contribute to biofilm formation (Jabalameli et al., 2012; Naimie et al., 2016) and the release of NETs (Thanabalasuriar et al., 2019). In this model, NETs production allows the maturation of the biofilm formation and the inhibition of the dissemination to the brain. However, NETs formation generates a severe local ulcer in the eye without killing the pathogen (Thanabalasuriar et al., 2019).
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the causative agent of tuberculosis, a chronic infectious lung disease that affects over one-third of the global population and causes 8 million new cases per year (Theodor, 2013; Ramazanzadeh et al., 2015). Mtb secrete the protein ESAT-6 by the ESX-1 type VII secretion system, increasing Ca2 + influx inside the cell, activating calpain, a cysteine protease, which finally allows the release of NETs structures through a pathway similar to the activation produced by ionomycin (Francis et al., 2014). This mechanism contributes to lung pathology and generates an environment more permissive to infection (Francis et al., 2014). Furthermore, in neutrophils obtained from human alveolar lining fluid, ETs structures fail to kill Mtb but contribute to reducing the bacterial dissemination ().
It is also known that the bacteria Mycobacterium bovis or Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG), which is currently used as a vaccine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, can trigger NET formation (Liu et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020). This bacterium is currently used to induce protection against heterologous antigens as well (; ; Goulart et al., 2017; Soto et al., 2018; ) and is also used as a immunotherapy in different diseases in humans. The NETs pathway activated by BCG depends mainly on ROS production (Liu et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020). Furthermore, it was also shown that NETs entrap but do not kill bacteria, which may be due to the high lipid levels of the mycobacterial envelope that impair NET-mediated killing (Liu et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020).
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium usually part of the normal microbiota (Krismer et al., 2017). However, this bacterium can act as an opportunistic pathogen and eventually be the causative agent of significant systemic disease due to the activity of several virulence factors. It was observed in human neutrophils that S. aureus induces NETs due to a leukotoxin GH (LukGH), which generates NETs release and entrap but does not kill the bacteria (Malachowa et al., 2013). In a porcine chronic burn model, S. aureus biofilms -in opposite to single-cell populations- promote the formation of NETs through the combined action of leukocidins Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) and γ-hemolysin AB () without the avoidance of bacterial dissemination (Malachowa et al., 2013). Through this response, S. aureus persisted because the antimicrobial activity of NETs was ineffective at eliminating the bacteria associated with the biofilm (; Speziale and Pietrocola, 2021).
Staphylococcus aureus also produce different enzymes to interfere with the antimicrobial property of the extracellular DNA, such as a DNA binding protein, the extracellular adherence protein (Eap) (), and a nuclease (Nuc). These enzymes allow the escape from the NETs structure, delay the bacteria clearance and increase the mortality caused by the infection. Also, this nuclease is related to the persistence of the bacteria in cystic fibrosis patients (; Herzog et al., 2019). Eap binds to linearized extracellular DNA, aggregates this structure, and interferes with the antimicrobial and trapping function of NETs structure in human-derived neutrophils (; Eisenbeis et al., 2018). On the other side, the adenosine synthase (Thammavongsa et al., 2013) in conjunction with a nuclease Nuc are required to generate deoxyadenosine (dAdo) from dsDNA derived from the NETs release in human-derived neutrophils, inducing caspase-3-mediated death on macrophages that are recruited to the site of infection (Figure 1; Thammavongsa et al., 2013).
Bordetella spp.
Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) is a Gram-negative bacterium and the causative agent of whooping cough, causing approximately 151,000 cases globally in 2018, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). This bacterium expresses several virulence factors as pertussis and adenylate cyclase toxins (Ladant and Ullmann, 1999; Mooi et al., 2009). The adenylate cyclase toxin (ACT) prolongs the life span of human-derived neutrophils and inhibits the release of NETs by increasing cAMP levels and inhibiting intracellular ROS production (Eby et al., 2014). Bordetella parapertussis also generates whooping cough (Watanabe and Nagai, 2004; ) and produce an adenylate cyclase enzyme, CyaA, that is released to the extracellular medium and inhibits the ROS production generated by NOX (Gorgojo et al., 2017), inhibiting the NET induction in human-derived neutrophils (Figure 1). However, NETs induced by these bacteria can trap and kill bacteria because they fail to express other virulence factors to dismantle the structure (Gorgojo et al., 2017).
Streptococcus spp.
Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a group of Gram-positive, β-hemolytic bacteria, part of the normal microbiota that can generate between 10,649 to13,434 cases of invasive GAS infections that occur in the United States annually (Stevens, 1992; ; Nelson et al., 2016). In human neutrophils, GAS expresses the M1 exotoxin, a virulence factor, which induces ETs in neutrophils and mast cells by associating with fibrinogen and forming a complex that stimulates neutrophils (Lauth et al., 2009). However, these ETs do not kill the pathogen because the M1 exotoxin allows the pathogen’s survival in the presence of cathelicidin and antimicrobial peptides (Lauth et al., 2009). Besides this, GAS expresses a DNase Sda1, which promotes the degradation of the NETs (; Moon et al., 2016). Streptococcus pyogenes is the main species that belongs to GAS. Besides Sda1 (), it produces another nuclease, SpnA, that is not secreted but is anchored to the cell wall and allows bacteria survival in human blood and resist NETs killing (). Also streptolysin O, a pore-forming toxin, induces eukaryotic cell lysis (Uchiyama et al., 2015) due to a decrease in the oxidative burst and, consequently, inhibits the release of NETs and the extracellular killing (Uchiyama et al., 2015) allowing bacteria survival in the bloodstream.
Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) is an alpha-hemolytic bacterium and the leading cause of pneumonia worldwide, mainly in children, that caused 294,000 deaths during 2015 (Wahl et al., 2018). It has been described that the induction of NETs in this disease has been correlated with an adverse outcome in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (Gray, 2018). However, in a mice model of infection, it was observed that although NETs can entrap S. pneumoniae (Figure 1), it fails to kill this pathogen due to the expression of endA, a bacterial cell-bound DNase. EndA destroys the NETs and promotes the spreading of bacteria from the upper airways to the lungs and bloodstream, promoting a more invasive disease (; Zhu et al., 2013). The S. pneumoniae capsule also contributes to avoiding the bacterial entrapping by NETs (Wartha et al., 2007). Due to the operon dlt that produces the modification of lipoteichoic acids, which introduce positive charge into alanine amino acid residues, which then caused electrochemical repulsion of antimicrobial proteins present in NETs (Wartha et al., 2007). This molecular mechanism contributes to bacterial resistance to the killing by NETs (Wartha et al., 2007). Importantly, it has been described that IL-10 production by neutrophils in C57BL/6 mice can modulate the lung injury induced by S. pneumoniae infection (González et al., 2021). It has been described that IL-10 can inhibit the TLR7/8 activation pathway, which prevents the generation of ROS and the translocation of NE to the nucleus, decreasing the NETs release (Saitoh et al., 2012), but it is unknown whether IL-10 producing neutrophils are still able to produce NETs.
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is a Gram-negative bacteria found in the nasopharynx and the intestinal tract. It is the most relevant species for humans of the genus Klebsiella spp. and a significant cause of nosocomial infection, responsible for severe diseases such as septicemia, pneumonia and urinary tract infections (Podschun and Ullmann, 1998). In the United States, the infection caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) produce up to 2.93 cases per 100,000 people (Guh et al., 2015). CRE sequence type 258 (CRKP-ST258) is a multidrug-resistant strain that has spread worldwide, which evades the neutrophil immune response, preventing intracellular killing and NETs release in neutrophils derived from human () and mice (Peñaloza et al., 2020). In human neutrophils, it was described that inhibition of NETs release was due to the avoidance of ROS production, produced to in part to the polysaccharide of the LPS (). In mouse neutrophils, no differences in ROS or MPO was observed when compared to a non-pathogenic K. pneumoniae, but differences in the acidification of the phagolysosome was described, which affects the functionality of MPO (Peñaloza et al., 2020). Another in vitro study performed in human-derived neutrophils showed that K. pneumoniae carbapenem-resistant affects the release of NETs due to the mobilization of primary granules due to a non-soluble virulence factor ().
Other Gram-Negative Bacteria
Yersinia enterocolitica is the causative agent of yersiniosis auto-limited gastroenteritis (Marks et al., 2018), producing 9.7 cases each 100,000 people per year, being children between 6 and 11 months the most affected (Yagüe-Muñoz et al., 2019). Three different serotypes (O:3, O:8, and O:9) were tested for induction of NETs release in human-derived neutrophils and all of them induce and degrade NETs by the action of Ca2+/Mg2+-dependent NET-degrading nuclease (Figure 1; Möllerherm et al., 2015). Secretory diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of a previously considered non-inflammatory disease, has recently been shown to recruit a high number of neutrophils (Queen and Satchell, 2012). Human-derived neutrophils in direct contact with Vibrio release NETs in an oxidative burst-dependent fashion and can kill the bacteria (Seper et al., 2013). Nevertheless, at the same time, bacteria induce two extracellular nucleases: Dns and Xds, which enhance pathogen dissemination (Figure 1; Seper et al., 2013). Mycoplasma pneumoniae causes atypical pneumonia and produces an extracellular nuclease, Mpn491, that requires Mg2+ to degrade the NETs structure in in vitro and in vivo models (Yamamoto et al., 2017).
Neisseria meningitidis (meningococci) is a Gram-negative bacterium that can cause severe septicemia in children and is a restricted human pathogen. Neisseria also presents a putatively secreted thermonuclease denominated Nuc, which induces and degrades NETs from human-derived blood, contributing to the escape and the avoidance of the killing of the pathogen (Lappann et al., 2013). Meningococcus display at least three different mechanisms to avoid NETs killing: (1) the lipid A modification of LPS with a phosphoethanolamine transferase is crucial for the survival of Neisseria meningitidis in the presence of NETs in vitro, due to this modification, bacteria are protected from the action of the cathepsin-G antimicrobial peptide; (2) it produces an outer membrane receptor ZnuD, which is crucial to uptake the Zn2+ and promote the nutritional resistance in the environment induced by the NETs; (3) it secrete small vesicles from the outer membrane into the environment (SOMVs), which have been identified as the inducers of NETs release and also bind to the NETs structure to reduce its bacteriostatic effect (Lappann et al., 2013; Figure 1).
Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative bacterium and the causative agent of melioidosis, a zoonotic infection leading to lung, localized or systemic infection. It is a critical pathogen in diabetic patients, and it is estimated that exist 165,000 human melioidosis cases per year, of which 89,000 people die with a case fatality rate of more than 50% (; Limmathurotsakul et al., 2010; ). This bacterium triggers the induction of NOX2-dependent NETs released in human- and mouse-derived neutrophils, and in addition to entrapping bacteria, NETs can significantly reduce the initial inoculum (Riyapa et al., 2012). However, the TTSS and capsular polysaccharide-1 expressed by these bacteria can regulate the proportion of NETs released, possibly by regulating the oxidative burst (Riyapa et al., 2012).
Leptospira spp. is an important cause of zoonotic infection, which can generate rapid bloodstream dissemination and affect mainly the kidney function, and in this manner, the carrier disseminates the infection (Scharrig et al., 2015). It was shown that Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhagen strain Fiocruz L1-130 (LIC) induces NETs released by human- and mouse-derived neutrophils, which entraps and kills bacteria, decreasing the CFU content. However, some pathogenic strains can degrade the dsDNA structure, implying that the NETs function depends on the infecting bacterial strain (Scharrig et al., 2015).
Contribution of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap to Viral Infections
In addition to the widely described role of bacteria in triggering NETs release, increasing evidence indicates that viruses can also promote NET formation (Jenne et al., 2013; Souza et al., 2018). Current data suggest that PRRs expressed on the surface or internal compartments of neutrophils, such as endosomes, play a crucial role in triggering NETs release (Saitoh et al., 2012). Other studies suggest that, as observed for bacteria, viruses may counteract the mechanisms involved in triggering NETs release during infection (Martinez et al., 1996). It is also documented that mechanisms underlying NET release induced by viruses may differ mechanistically depending on the specific pathogen involved (Muraro et al., 2018; ). Along these lines, it has been described that NET release may either promote or prevent the viral-induced pathology (Jenne et al., 2013; ).
In the case of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1), it has been documented that NETs promote pathogen clearance through the concerted action of MPO, α-defensin, and histones (Saitoh et al., 2012). In this work, cultivated neutrophils were exposed to HIV and the results suggest that NETs release induced by infection occurs through the engagement of endosome-expressed TLR7 and TLR8, which induce ROS-dependent NET formation (Figure 2). Therefore, in this case, NET formation benefits the infected host to prevent pathogen spreading (Saitoh et al., 2012). Remarkably, HIV-1 counteracts this response by inducing the production of IL-10 by DCs, which suppresses the ROS-dependent response that results in an impaired NET-dependent HIV-1 elimination.
FIGURE 2
Another example of a protective role of NETs during viral infection is the case of the myxoma virus (MYXV) (Jenne et al., 2013). This oncolytic virus is characterized by its ability to infect rabbits and kill human and murine cancer cells (Lun et al., 2005). Therefore, it has been proposed as a viral-based therapy for cancer (Rahman and McFadden, 2020). In the mice model, intravenous infection with MYVX induces massive recruitment of neutrophils and platelets to the liver vasculature (Jenne et al., 2013). At this site, the interaction of both subsets of cells promotes the release of NETs that can protect host cells from MYVX infection, and this protective effect was reversed by DNase treatment (Jenne et al., 2013). These results highlight the role of extracellular DNA in preventing viral dissemination (Jenne et al., 2013). According to this notion, it has also been shown that viral proteins with DNase activity derived from Herpesviruses can also degrade NETs, thereby preventing the formation of NETs and promoting viral spreading (Martinez et al., 1996).
Influenza is another respiratory virus that circulates worldwide and can trigger NETs release (; Zhu et al., 2018; ). Annual influenza cases lead to extensive mortality, especially in people older than 65 years. According to a recent study, it was estimated that influenza infection accounts for 4.0–8.8 deaths per 100,000 individuals annually (Iuliano et al., 2018). Sudden onset of fever, headache, sore throat, and a runny nose develops upon infection. Illnesses range from mild to severe and can lead to the death of infected individuals (Ryu and Cowling, 2020). Patients with severe influenza showed elevated plasma NET release, measured as the level of cell-free DNA and DNA-MPO complexes (Zhu et al., 2018). In addition, isolated neutrophils from these subjects released higher amounts of MPO-DNA complex in response to IL-8 or LPS (Zhu et al., 2018). Interestingly NETs from H7N9 and H1N1 patients increased the permeability of alveolar epithelial cells, and, consequently, NET production was positively correlated with acute inflammation (Zhu et al., 2018). Together, this data indicates that high levels of NETs correlate with influenza severity. Thus, evaluation of NETs in plasma could be an excellent strategy to predict the prognosis of IAV patients (Zhu et al., 2018).
Histones present in the lungs of IAV infected mice have been shown to induce cytotoxicity on cultured human lung epithelial cells (). Furthermore, histones also bind to platelets within thrombi in infected mouse lungs (). Nasal aspirates from influenza-infected patients also have elevated levels of extracellular histones, which may serve as a clinical marker of pulmonary injury (). In vitro studies showed that histones inhibited influenza growth. However, in the mice model, in vivo treatment with histones did not yield antiviral effects and instead increased lung illness (). The blockade of histones with anti-histone antibodies caused a significant reduction of lung pathology in lethal influenza–challenged mice and enhanced protection when co-administered with the antiviral oseltamivir (). These data highlight the pathogenic effects of extracellular histones in pulmonary injury during influenza infection. These findings suggest that targeting histones represents a novel therapeutic strategy for treating influenza pneumonia ().
Another study described that NETs release is triggered only by some IAV specific strains (). For example, it is indicated that the H5N1 strain fails to stimulate NETs release, whereas H1N1 infection stimulates NET production by isolated human neutrophils (). Furthermore, it is also thought that infection with H5N1 caused a more severe disease than H1N1 infection (), which opens the question of whether there are other innate immune responses rather than NETs release that can account for more severe disease (). The same study suggested that NET production induced by H1N1 is not dependent on the NOX-produced ROS (). Consistent with this notion is the observation that neutrophils exposed to the NOX inhibitor diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) were able to produce NETs in response to an H1N1 challenge (). Thus, as observed for some bacteria, such as S. aureus, the possibility that NET release occurs independently of ROS production is also described for viruses ().
Human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) represents one of the most important causes of acute lower respiratory tract infection in young children and the elderly (; ; Rey-Jurado and Kalergis, 2017; ). Regarding the neutrophil role during hRSV infection, it was shown that hRSV triggers NET release in human-derived neutrophils (Funchal et al., 2015; ; Muraro et al., 2018). Furthermore, NETs were observed in the airways and lungs of children with severe lower respiratory tract disease caused by hRSV (LRTD) (). Furthermore, the extensive NET formation was associated with occluded airways of hRSV-infected calves, which may or not colocalize with viral antigens (). These data suggest that NETs may or not trap viral particles, but their exacerbated formation during hRSV infection contributes to airway obstruction (). Regarding the mechanism involved in such neutrophil response, it was shown that RSV induced the classical ROS-dependent NETosis in which viral particles are entrapped by DNA frameworks coated with MPO and NE. Furthermore, RSV-induced NETosis is also mediated by PAD-4-dependent histone citrullination and signaling through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (Muraro et al., 2018).
It was recently shown that during SARS-CoV-2 infection, the quantity of NETs release, measured as DNA-MPO complex, was increased in plasma, tracheal aspirate, and lung autopsies tissues from COVID-19 patients (Veras et al., 2020). Interestingly, this study also showed that infective SARS-CoV-2 but not the inactivated virus increased the release of NETs by neutrophils in an MOI-dependent manner (Veras et al., 2020). Notably, the release of NET after the SARS-CoV-2 challenge was abrogated when isolated neutrophils were pre-treated with a neutralizing anti-hACE2 antibody (αACE2) (Veras et al., 2020). Furthermore, the NET release was also prevented if neutrophils were pre-treated with the drug camostat, an inhibitor of the serine protease TMPRSS2 that blocks early interactions of SARS-CoV-2 S protein with the ACE2 receptor (Hoffmann et al., 2020). Furthermore, drugs also appear to inhibit viral replication as the viral load of neutrophils exposed to SARS-CoV-2 was reduced after αACE2 or camostat treatment (Veras et al., 2020).
This study also highlights the contribution of viral replication to the release of NETs upon the interaction of neutrophils with SARS-CoV-2. Incubation of neutrophils with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), an RNA polymerase inhibitor (), reduced the release of NETs in neutrophils derived from healthy donors exposed to SARS-CoV-2. In addition, co-culture of SARS-CoV-2–activated neutrophils with epithelial cells promotes cell death in vitro, and this effect was prevented if DNAse was added in the culture medium (Veras et al., 2020). These data suggest an essential role for the extracellular DNA in promoting the cytotoxic effects of NETs. Together, these results underscore a possible detrimental role of NETs in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. Therefore, therapies targeted to inhibit the formation of NETs or promote the degradation of neutrophil extracellular DNA could be evaluated for a potential therapeutic benefit for COVID-19 (Veras et al., 2020).
Another study showed that high serum NETs, measured as cell-free DNA, DNA-MPO complex and citrullinated histones H3, are present in several hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (Zuo et al., 2020). The authors measure three different markers to assess the presence of NETs in blood corresponding to cell-free DNA, MPO-DNA, and Citrullinated Histone 3. Interestingly, sera from COVID-19 patients were a potent stimulator of NETs release when added to resting neutrophils, suggesting that a component present in serum may generate a pro-NETotic state on COVID-19 patients (Zuo et al., 2020).
It has also been described that those levels of plasma MPO-DNA complexes increased in intubated and dead COVID-19 patients (Middleton et al., 2020). The severity of the disease correlated directly with plasma MPO-DNA complexes. Soluble and cellular factors triggering NETs were significantly increased in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, pulmonary autopsies showed NET-containing microthrombi with infiltrating neutrophils and platelets. Finally, neutrophils from COVID-19 patients displayed excessive NETs at baseline, and COVID-19 plasma triggered NET formation, blocked by neonatal NET-inhibitory factor (nNIF) (Middleton et al., 2020). Considering the prothrombotic clinical presentations of COVID-19 and the role of NETs in triggering such response points to targeting NETs as a novel therapeutic intervention for COVID-19 (Middleton et al., 2020).
Regarding additional pathways that regulate the generation of NETs during COVID-19, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β has been described as a critical inductor of NETs, both in vivo and in vitro assays (Meher et al., 2018). Furthermore, current evidence also suggests that NETs may promote the production of IL-1β precursors by macrophages that are used to amplify further the production of NETs (Hu et al., 2017). Under this scenario of excessive NET formation, alveolar and pulmonary endothelium becomes damaged, leading to the release of the von Willebrand factor (vWF), which activates blood platelets and neutrophils (Fernández-Pérez et al., 2021). Subsequently, activated platelets also stimulate neutrophils to produce NETs and clots, promoting airway obstruction impairing an efficient gaseous exchange (Pujhari et al., 2020).
IgA is another factor that can modulate NET formation during SARS-CoV-2 infection (Stacey et al., 2021). IgA is the second most abundant antibody present in the circulation and is enriched at mucosal surfaces. Therefore, this antibody plays a crucial role in protecting against mucosal pathogens, including viruses. IgA can also stimulate effector functions via the engagement of Fc alpha receptors (Fc-αRI) expressed on the surface of neutrophils (Stacey et al., 2021). In recent work, it was shown that IgA–virus immune complexes potentiate NETs release. This experiment used purified SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped lentivirus, which were then opsonized with polyclonal IgA isolated from a convalescent COVID-19 donor serum. Interestingly virus opsonization increases the NET formation and potentiates a suicidal NETs release pathway. This process was independent of TLR signaling but required a functional NADPH oxidase complex. Therefore, targeting the NADPH oxidase complex may be a suitable strategy to decrease SARS-CoV-2 triggered NETs release (Stacey et al., 2021).
Concluding Remarks
The mechanisms underlying NETs formation and their contribution to bacterial and viral infections have been studied as a primary function. However, during recent years, the role of NETs has changed, being an important matter when it comes to complications in several diseases. The different roles of NETs are in line with the fact that there is no specific pathway or stimuli to induce NETs release and that not all the stimuli are as good inducers of NETs as PMA or Gram-negative or -positive bacteria are. It is possible that the time of incubation and the dosing generates differences in the results obtained among the studies (Hoppenbrouwers et al., 2017). Also, as mentioned above, the antimicrobial properties of the granular enzymes of the NETs have been evaluated and, in some cases, do not generate a good antimicrobial capacity and probably have other immunomodulatory properties. Even more, the bactericidal capacities of NETs have been questioned because several studies have not evidenced a significant reduction of the initial inoculum in in vitro experiments (bactericidal effect). Further, the lysis (bacteriolytic effect) and the entrap of the bacteria (bacteriostatic effect) has not been consistently reproduced. In line with this, the citrullination of the DNA is also controversial because there are at least two more mechanisms, different from NETs release, that induce the citrullination: the leukotoxic hypercitrullination (LTH) which is not antimicrobial and can be induced by some virulence factors as toxins from S. aureus and Streptococcus spp., and the release of mitochondrial DNA due to a defect in mitophagy in neutrophils. Both processes are highly relevant in autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, respectively (Konig and Andrade, 2016).
It is possible that the different types of NETs are induced at different time points during an infection, being possible that the first type of NETs release upon stimulation is composed of mitochondrial DNA, which still allows the survival of the cell. In this manner, the cell continues engulfing and performing antimicrobial properties. In addition, the release of mitochondrial DNA induces the secretion of type I interferon by plasmacytoid cells, generating a better immune response. Also, it is possible that NETs release composes of nuclear DNA occurs after the release of mitochondrial DNA, as an inflammatory consequence of the mitochondrial NETs release, inducing the NETosis process due to the nuclear NETs release. As example of this, the fibers that entrap the microorganisms are generated in vital NETs release, in opposite to the suicidal NETosis, were a cloud of DNA is generated, which not necessarily present antimicrobial properties (Yousefi and Simon, 2016).
It is currently studied that bacteria and viruses induce different pathways of NETs release, depending on the receptor activated by the microorganism. In this sense, bacteria have developed various mechanisms to evade the NETs release, generating a state of inflammation that allows pathogen spreading or the generation of a niche of infection—being the most common virulence factor among bacteria, the enzymes that degraded the NETs structure (Table 1). It is essential to mention that as NETs release, an inflammatory environment exists, and regulating this process is extremely necessary. One regulation occurs during the elimination of the NETs structure by the action of DNases, or C1q, allowing the recognition by the M1 macrophages (Farrera and Fadeel, 2013). Finally, it is crucial to find a proper definition of NETs due to the several aspects discussed above, which recognize if some pathogens induce or not the structure with antimicrobial properties or induce a structure that allows a higher inflammatory environment. Along these lines, this antimicrobial response will open targets for therapeutic intervention to treat diseases caused by bacteria and viruses, for example, the treatment of cystic fibrosis with DNases to liquify the sputum properly.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
SB and BS: visualization. BS and OA: writing – origi nal draft. AK and SB: writing – review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was supported by grants “Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Chile” (FONDECYT) (# 1190830 and # 11706964), the Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, ANID – Millennium Science Initiative Program ICN09_016 (former P09/016-F), and the Regional Government of Antofagasta through the Innovation Fund for Competitiveness FIC-R 2017 (BIP Code: 30488811-0).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Al-AnaziK. A.Al-AnaziW. K.Al-JasserA. M. (2020). Neutrophils, NETs, NETosis and their paradoxical roles in COVID-19.J. Stem Cell Ther. Transplant.4003–010. 10.29328/journal.jsctt.1001020
2
AminiP.StojkovD.FelserA.JacksonC. B.CourageC.SchallerA.et al (2018). Neutrophil extracellular trap formation requires OPA1-dependent glycolytic ATP production.Nat. Commun.9:2958. 10.1038/s41467-018-05387-y
3
AraiY.NishinakaY.AraiT.MoritaM.MizugishiK.AdachiS.et al (2014). Uric acid induces NADPH oxidase-independent neutrophil extracellular trap formation.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.443556–561. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.007
4
ArcosJ.DiangeloL. E.ScordoJ. M.SasindranS. J.MolivaJ. I.TurnerJ.et al (2015). Lung mucosa lining fluid modification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to reprogram human neutrophil killing mechanisms.J. Infect. Dis.212948–958. 10.1093/infdis/jiv146
5
AsharH. K.MuellerN. C.RuddJ. M.SniderT. A.AchantaM.PrasanthiM.et al (2018). The role of extracellular histones in influenza virus pathogenesis.Am. J. Pathol.188135–148. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.09.014
6
AulikN. A.HellenbrandK. M.CzuprynskiC. J. (2012). Mannheimia haemolytica and its leukotoxin cause macrophage extracellular trap formation by bovine macrophages.Infect. Immun.801923–1933. 10.1128/IAI.06120-11
7
AzzouzL.CherryA.RiedlM.KhanM.PlutheroF. G.KahrW. H. A.et al (2018). Relative antibacterial functions of complement and NETs: NETs trap and complement effectively kills bacteria.Mol. Immunol.9771–81. 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.02.019
8
BeiterK.WarthaF.AlbigerB.NormarkS.ZychlinskyA.Henriques-NormarkB. (2006). An endonuclease allows Streptococcus pneumoniae to escape from neutrophil extracellular traps.Curr. Biol.16401–407. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.056
9
BerendsE. T. M.HorswillA. R.HasteN. M.MonestierM.NizetV.Von Köckritz-BlickwedeM. (2010). Nuclease expression by Staphylococcus aureus facilitates escape from neutrophil extracellular traps.J. Innate Immun.2576–586. 10.1159/000319909
10
BhattacharyaM.BerendsE. T. M.ChanR.SchwabE.RoyS.SenC. K.et al (2018). Staphylococcus aureus biofilms release leukocidins to elicit extracellular trap formation and evade neutrophil-mediated killing.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1157416–7421. 10.1073/pnas.1721949115
11
Birnberg-WeissF.CastilloL. A.PittalugaJ. R.Martire-GrecoD.GómezS. A.LandoniV. I.et al (2021). Modulation of neutrophil extracellular traps release by Klebsiella pneumoniae.J. Leukoc. Biol.109245–256. 10.1002/JLB.4MA0620-099R
12
BirnieE.VirkH. S.SavelkoelJ.SpijkerR.BertheratE.DanceD. A. B.et al (2019). Global burden of melioidosis in 2015: a systematic review and data synthesis.Lancet Infect. Dis.19892–902. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30157-4
13
BohmwaldK.EspinozaJ. A.Rey-JuradoE.GómezR. S.GonzálezP. A.BuenoS. M.et al (2016). Human respiratory syncytial virus: infection and pathology.Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med.37522–537.
14
BouabeH.LiuY.MoserM.BöslM. R.HeesemannJ. (2011). Novel highly sensitive IL-10-b-lactamase reporter mouse reveals cells of the innate immune system as a substantial source of IL-10 in vivo.J. Immunol.1873165–3176. 10.4049/jimmunol.1101477
15
BouchezV.GuisoN. (2015). Bordetella pertussis, B. parapertussis, vaccines and cycles of whooping cough.Pathog. Dis.73:ftv055. 10.1093/femspd/ftv055
16
BranzkN.LubojemskaA.HardisonS. E.WangQ.GutierrezM. G.BrownG. D.et al (2014). Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens.Nat. Immunol.151017–1025. 10.1038/ni.2987
17
BrinkmannV.ReichardU.GoosmannC.FaulerB.UhlemannY.WeissD. S.et al (2004). Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria.Science3031532–1535.
18
BrownG. T.McIntyreT. M. (2011). Lipopolysaccharide signaling without a nucleus: kinase cascades stimulate platelet shedding of proinflammatory IL-1β-rich microparticles.J. Immunol.1865489–5496. 10.4049/jimmunol.1001623
19
BuchananJ. T.SimpsonA. J.AzizR. K.LiuG. Y.KristianS. A.KotbM.et al (2006). DNase expression allows the pathogen group A Streptococcus to escape killing in neutrophil extracellular traps.Curr. Biol.16396–400. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.039
20
CacciottoC.CubedduT.AddisM. F.AnfossiA. G.TeddeV.ToreG.et al (2016). Mycoplasma lipoproteins are major determinants of neutrophil extracellular trap formation.Cell. Microbiol.181751–1762. 10.1111/cmi.12613
21
Campillo-NavarroM.Leyva-ParedesK.Donis-MaturanoL.González-JiménezM.Paredes-VivasY.Cerbulo-VázquezA.et al (2017). Listeria monocytogenes induces mast cell extracellular traps.Immunobiology222432–439. 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.08.006
22
Campillo-NavarroM.Leyva-ParedesK.Donis-MaturanoL.Rodríguez-LópezG. M.Soria-CastroR.García-PérezB. E.et al (2018). Mycobacterium tuberculosis catalase inhibits the formation of mast cell extracellular traps.Front. Immunol.9:1161. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01161
23
Canedo-MarroquínG.Acevedo-AcevedoO.Rey-JuradoE.SaavedraJ. M.LayM. K.BuenoS. M.et al (2017). Modulation of host immunity by human respiratory syncytial virus virulence factors: a synergic inhibition of both innate and adaptive immunity.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.7:367. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00367
24
CarvajalJ. J.AvellanedaA. M.Salazar-ArdilesC.MayaJ. E.KalergisA. M.LayM. K. (2019). Host components contributing to respiratory syncytial virus pathogenesis.Front. Immunol.10:2152. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02152
25
CastilloL. A.Birnberg-WeissF.Rodriguez-RodriguesN.Martire-GrecoD.BigiF.LandoniV. I.et al (2019). Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 negatively regulates the oxidative burst in human neutrophils.Front. Immunol.10:929. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00929
26
CéspedesP. F.Rey-JuradoE.EspinozaJ. A.RiveraC. A.Canedo-MarroquínG.BuenoS. M.et al (2017). A single, low dose of a cGMP recombinant BCG vaccine elicits protective T cell immunity against the human respiratory syncytial virus infection and prevents lung pathology in mice.Vaccine35757–766. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.048
27
ChanL. L. Y.NichollsJ. M.PeirisJ. S. M.LauY. L.ChanM. C. W.ChanR. W. Y. (2020). Host DNA released by NETosis in neutrophils exposed to seasonal H1N1 and highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses.Respir. Res.21:160. 10.1186/s12931-020-01425-w
28
ChanchamroenS.KewcharoenwongC.SusaengratW.AtoM.LertmemongkolchaiG. (2009). Human polymorphonuclear neutrophil responses to Burkholderia pseudomallei in healthy and diabetic subjects.Infect. Immun.77456–463. 10.1128/IAI.00503-08
29
ChangA.KhemlaniA.KangH.ProftT. (2011). Functional analysis of Streptococcus pyogenes nuclease A (SpnA), a novel group A streptococcal virulence factor.Mol. Microbiol. 79, 1629–1642. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07550.x
30
ChavakisT.WiechmannK.PreissnerK. T.HerrmannM. (2005). Staphylococcus aureus interactions with the endothelium: the role of bacterial “secretable expanded repertoire adhesive molecules” (SERAM) in disturbing host defense systems.Thromb. Haemost.94278–285. 10.1160/TH05-05-0306
31
ChenK.NishiH.TraversR.TsuboiN.MartinodK.WagnerD. D.et al (2012). Endocytosis of soluble immune complexes leads to their clearance by FcγRIIIB but induces neutrophil extracellular traps via FcγRIIA in vivo.Blood1204421–4431.
32
ChenK. W.MonteleoneM.BoucherD.SollbergerG.RamnathD.CondonN. D.et al (2018). Noncanonical inflammasome signaling elicits gasdermin D–dependent neutrophil extracellular traps.Sci. Immunol.3:6676. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6676
33
ChowO. A.Von Köckritz-BlickwedeM.BrightA. T.HenslerM. E.ZinkernagelA. S.CogenA. L.et al (2010). Statins enhance formation of phagocyte extracellular traps.Cell Host Microbe8445–454. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.10.005
34
ClancyD. M. (2018). Extracellular neutrophil proteases are efficient regulators of IL-1, IL-33, and IL-36 cytokine activity but poor effectors of microbial killing.Cell Rep.222937–2950. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.062
35
ClarkS. R.MaA. C.TavenerS. A.McDonaldB.GoodarziZ.KellyM. M.et al (2007). Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood.Nat. Med.13463–469. 10.1038/nm1565
36
ClaudiaR.RodrigoD.PabloC.SusanB.AlexisK. (2015). A recombinant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine promotes protective humoral immunity against the human respiratory syncytial virus.Front. Immunol.6:177. 10.3389/conf.fimmu.2015.05.00177
37
ClososkiG. C.SoldiR. A.da SilvaR. M.GuaratiniT.LopesJ. N. C.PereiraP. R. R.et al (2020). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: new chemical developments and encouraging in vitro biological results for SARS-CoV-2.J. Braz. Chem. Soc.311552–1556.
38
Cools-LartigueJ.SpicerJ.NajmehS.FerriL. (2014). Neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer progression.Cell. Mol. Life Sci.714179–4194.
39
CortjensB.de BoerO. J.de JongR.AntonisA. F.Sabogal PiñerosY. S.LutterR.et al (2016). Neutrophil extracellular traps cause airway obstruction during respiratory syncytial virus disease.J. Pathol.238401–411. 10.1002/path.4660
40
CoviánC.Fernández-FierroA.Retamal-DíazA.DíazF. E.VasquezA. E.LayM. K.et al (2019). BCG-induced cross-protection and development of trained immunity: implication for vaccine design.Front. Immunol.10:2806. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02806
41
CunhaA. A.PortoB. N.NuñezN. K.SouzaR. G.VargasM. H. M.SilveiraJ. S.et al (2014). Extracellular DNA traps in bronchoalveolar fluid from a murine eosinophilic pulmonary response.Allergy691696–1700. 10.1111/all.12507
42
DaviesJ. C. (2002). Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: pathogenesis and persistence.Paediatr. Respir. Rev.3128–134. 10.1016/s1526-0550(02)00003-3
43
de JongH. K.KohG. C.AchouitiA.van der MeerA. J.BulderI.StephanF.et al (2014). Neutrophil extracellular traps in the host defense against sepsis induced by Burkholderia pseudomallei (melioidosis).Intensive Care Med. Exp.2:21. 10.1186/s40635-014-0021-2
44
DeutscherM.LewisM.ZellE. R.TaylorT. H.Jr.Van BenedenC.SchragS. (2011). Incidence and severity of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae, Group A Streptococcus, and Group BS treptococcus infections among pregnant and postpartum women.Clin. Infect. Dis.53114–123. 10.1093/cid/cir325
45
DosterR. S.RogersL. M.GaddyJ. A.AronoffD. M. (2018). Macrophage extracellular traps: a scoping review.J. Innate Immun.103–13. 10.1159/000480373
46
DoudaD. N.KhanM. A.GrasemannH.PalaniyarN. (2015). SK3 channel and mitochondrial ROS mediate NADPH oxidase-independent NETosis induced by calcium influx.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1122817–2822. 10.1073/pnas.1414055112
47
DworskiR.SimonH. U.HoskinsA.YousefiS. (2011). Eosinophil and neutrophil extracellular DNA traps in human allergic asthmatic airways.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.1271260–1266. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1103
48
EbyJ. C.GrayM. C.HewlettE. L. (2014). Cyclic AMP-mediated suppression of neutrophil extracellular trap formation and apoptosis by the Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase toxin.Infect. Immun. 82, 5256–5269. 10.1128/IAI.02487-14
49
EchevarríaL. U.LeimgruberC.GonzálezJ. G.NevadoA.ÁlvarezR.GarcíaL. N.et al (2017). Evidence of eosinophil extracellular trap cell death in copd: does it represent the trigger that switches on the disease?Int. J. COPD12885–896. 10.2147/COPD.S115969
50
EisenbeisJ.SaffarzadehM.PeiskerH.JungP.ThewesN.PreissnerK. T.et al (2018). The Staphylococcus aureus extracellular adherence protein Eap Is a DNA binding protein capable of blocking neutrophil extracellular trap formation.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.8:235. 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00235
51
FarreraC.FadeelB. (2013). Macrophage clearance of neutrophil extracellular traps is a silent process.J. Immunol.1912647–2656. 10.4049/jimmunol.1300436
52
Fernández-PérezM. P.ÁguilaS.Reguilón-GallegoL.Los Reyes-GarcíaA. M.MiñanoA.Bravo-PérezC.et al (2021). Neutrophil extracellular traps and von Willebrand factor are allies that negatively influence COVID-19 outcomes.Clin. Transl. Med.11:e268. 10.1002/ctm2.268
53
FrancisR. J.ButlerR. E.StewartG. R. (2014). Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT-6 is a leukocidin causing Ca2+ influx, necrosis and neutrophil extracellular trap formation.Cell Death Dis.5:e1474. 10.1038/cddis.2014.394
54
FuchsT. A.AbedU.GoosmannC.HurwitzR.SchulzeI.WahnV.et al (2007). Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps.J. Cell Biol.176231–241. 10.1083/jcb.200606027
55
FunchalG. A.JaegerN.CzepielewskiR. S.MachadoM. S.MuraroS. P.SteinR. T.et al (2015). Respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein promotes TLR-4-dependent neutrophil extracellular trap formation by human neutrophils.PLoS One10:e0124082. 10.1371/journal.pone.0124082
56
Garcia-RomoG. S.CaielliS.VegaB.ConnollyJ.AllantazF.XuZ.et al (2011). Netting neutrophils are major inducers of type I IFN production in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus.Sci. Transl. Med.3:73ra20. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001201
57
GevaertE.ZhangN.KryskoO.LanF.HoltappelsG.De RuyckN.et al (2017). Extracellular eosinophilic traps in association with Staphylococcus aureus at the site of epithelial barrier defects in patients with severe airway inflammation.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.1391849.e6–1860.e6. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.019
58
GonzálezL. A.Melo-GonzálezF.SebastiánV. P.VallejosO. P.NogueraL. P.SuazoI. D.et al (2021). Characterization of the anti-inflammatory capacity of IL-10-producing neutrophils in response to infection.Front. Immunol.12:638917. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.638917
59
GorgojoJ.ScharrigE.GómezR. M.HarvillE. T.RodríguezM. E. (2017). Bordetella parapertussis circumvents neutrophil extracellular bactericidal mechanisms.PLoS One12:e0169936. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169936
60
GoulartC.RodriguezD.KannoA. I.LuY.-J.MalleyR.LeiteL. C. C. (2017). Recombinant BCG expressing a PspA-PdT fusion protein protects mice against pneumococcal lethal challenge in a prime-boost strategy.Vaccine351683–1691. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.029
61
GrayR. D. (2018). NETs in pneumonia: is just enough the right amount?Eur. Respir. J.51:1800619. 10.1183/13993003.00619-2018
62
GuhA. Y.BulensS. N.MuY.JacobJ. T.RenoJ.ScottJ.et al (2015). Epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in 7 US Communities, 2012-2013.JAMA3141479–1487.
63
GuichardM.-J.KinooD.AubriotA.-S.BauwensN.GouguéJ.VermeulenF.et al (2018). Impact of PEGylation on the mucolytic activity of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I in cystic fibrosis sputum.Clin. Sci.1321439–1452. 10.1042/CS20180315
64
GuiducciE.LembergC.KüngN.SchranerE.TheocharidesA. P. A.LeibundGut-LandmannS. (2018). Candida albicans-induced NETosis is independent of peptidylarginine deiminase 4.Front. Immunol.9:1573. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01573
65
Guimarães-CostaA. B.NascimentoM. T. C.FromentG. S.SoaresR. P. P.MorgadoF. N.Conceição-SilvaF.et al (2009). Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes induce and are killed by neutrophil extracellular traps.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1066748–6753. 10.1073/pnas.0900226106
66
HakkimA.FuchsT. A.MartinezN. E.HessS.PrinzH.ZychlinskyA.et al (2011). Activation of the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation.Nat. Chem. Biol.775–77. 10.1038/nchembio.496
67
HalderL. D.AbdelfatahM. A.JoE. A. H.JacobsenI. D.WestermannM.BeyersdorfN.et al (2017). Factor H binds to extracellular DNA traps released from human blood monocytes in response to Candida albicans.Front. Immunol.7:671. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00671
68
HalversonT. W. R.WiltonM.PoonK. K. H.PetriB.LewenzaS. (2015). DNA is an antimicrobial component of neutrophil extracellular traps.PLoS Pathog.11:e1004593. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004593
69
HellenbrandK. M.ForsytheK. M.Rivera-RivasJ. J.CzuprynskiC. J.AulikN. A. (2013). Histophilus somni causes extracellular trap formation by bovine neutrophils and macrophages.Microb. Pathog.5467–75. 10.1016/j.micpath.2012.09.007
70
HerzogS.DachF.de BuhrN.NiemannS.SchlagowskiJ.Chaves-MorenoD.et al (2019). High nuclease activity of long persisting Staphylococcus aureus isolates within the airways of cystic fibrosis patients protects against NET-mediated killing.Front. Immunol.10:2552. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02552
71
HirokiC. H.Toller-KawahisaJ. E.FumagalliM. J.ColonD. F.FigueiredoL. T. M.FonsecaB. A. L. D.et al (2019). Neutrophil extracellular traps effectively control acute chikungunya virus infection.Front. Immunol.10:3108. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03108
72
HoffmannM.Hofmann-WinklerH.SmithJ. C.KrügerN.SørensenL. K.SøgaardO. S.et al (2020). Camostat mesylate inhibits SARS-CoV-2 activation by TMPRSS2-related proteases and its metabolite GBPA exerts antiviral activity.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.08.05.237651
73
HoppenbrouwersT.AutarA. S. A.SultanA. R.AbrahamT. E.van CappellenW. A.HoutsmullerA. B.et al (2017). In vitro induction of NETosis: comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review.PLoS One12:e0176472. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176472
74
HuS. C. S.YuH. S.YenF. L.LinC. L.ChenG. S.LanC. C. E. (2016). Neutrophil extracellular trap formation is increased in psoriasis and induces human β-defensin-2 production in epidermal keratinocytes.Sci. Rep.61–14. 10.1038/srep31119
75
HuZ.MurakamiT.TamuraH.ReichJ.Kuwahara-AraiK.IbaT.et al (2017). Neutrophil extracellular traps induce IL-1β production by macrophages in combination with lipopolysaccharide.Int. J. Mol. Med.39549–558. 10.3892/ijmm.2017.2870
76
IulianoA. D.RoguskiK. M.ChangH. H.MuscatelloD. J.PalekarR.TempiaS.et al (2018). Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: a modelling study.Lancet3911285–1300. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33293-2
77
JabalameliF.MirsalehianA.KhoramianB.AligholiM.KhoramroozS. S.AsadollahiP.et al (2012). Evaluation of biofilm production and characterization of genes encoding type III secretion system among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients.Burns381192–1197. 10.1016/j.burns.2012.07.030
78
JenneC. N.WongC. H. Y.ZempF. J.McDonaldB.RahmanM. M.ForsythP. A.et al (2013). Neutrophils recruited to sites of infection protect from virus challenge by releasing neutrophil extracellular traps.Cell Host Microbe13169–180. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.01.005
79
KennyE. F.HerzigA.KrügerR.MuthA.MondalS.ThompsonP. R.et al (2017). Diverse stimuli engage different neutrophil extracellular trap pathways.eLife6:e24437. 10.7554/eLife.24437
80
KeshariR. S.JyotiA.DubeyM.KothariN.KohliM.BograJ.et al (2012). Cytokines induced neutrophil extracellular traps formation: implication for the inflammatory disease condition.PLoS One7:e48111. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048111
81
KessenbrockK.KrumbholzM.SchönermarckU.BackW.GrossW. L.WerbZ.et al (2009). Netting neutrophils in autoimmune small-vessel vasculitis.Nat. Med.15623–625. 10.1038/nm.1959
82
KhandpurR.Carmona-RiveraC.Vivekanandan-GiriA.GizinskiA.YalavarthiS.KnightJ. S.et al (2013). NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis.Sci. Transl. Med.5:178ra40. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005580
83
KnightJ. S.Carmona-RiveraC.KaplanM. J. (2012). Proteins derived from neutrophil extracellular traps may serve as self-antigens and mediate organ damage in autoimmune diseases.Front. Immunol.3:380. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00380
84
KonigM. F.AndradeF. (2016). A critical reappraisal of neutrophil extracellular traps and NETosis mimics based on differential requirements for protein citrullination.Front. Immunol.7:461. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00461
85
KraemerB. F.CampbellR. A.SchwertzH.FranksZ. G.Vieira de AbreuA.GrundlerK.et al (2012). Bacteria differentially induce degradation of Bcl-xL, a survival protein, by human platelets.Blood1205014–5020. 10.1182/blood-2012-04-420661
86
KrismerB.WeidenmaierC.ZippererA.PeschelA. (2017). The commensal lifestyle of Staphylococcus aureus and its interactions with the nasal microbiota.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.15675–687. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.104
87
LadantD.UllmannA. (1999). Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase: a toxin with multiple talents.Trends Microbiol.7172–176. 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80849-2
88
LappannM.DanhofS.GuentherF.Olivares-FlorezS.MordhorstI. L.VogelU. (2013). In vitro resistance mechanisms of Neisseria meningitidis against neutrophil extracellular traps.Mol. Microbiol.89433–449.
89
LauthX.Von Köckritz-BlickwedeM.McNamaraC. W.MyskowskiS.ZinkernagelA. S.BeallB.et al (2009). M1 protein allows group a streptococcal survival in phagocyte extracellular traps through cathelicidin inhibition.J. Innate Immun.1202–214. 10.1159/000203645
90
LiP.LiM.LindbergM. R.KennettM. J.XiongN.WangY. (2010). PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps.J. Exp. Med.2071853–1862. 10.1084/jem.20100239
91
LimmathurotsakulD.WongratanacheewinS.TeerawattanasookN.WongsuvanG.ChaisuksantS.ChetchotisakdP.et al (2010). Increasing incidence of human melioidosis in Northeast Thailand.Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.821113–1117. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0038
92
LiuK.SunE.LeiM.LiL.GaoJ.NianX.et al (2019). BCG-induced formation of neutrophil extracellular traps play an important role in bladder cancer treatment.Clin. Immunol.2014–14. 10.1016/j.clim.2019.02.005
93
LiuP.WuX.LiaoC.LiuX.DuJ.ShiH.et al (2014). Escherichia coli and Candida albicans induced macrophage extracellular trap-like structures with limited microbicidal activity.PLoS One9:e0090042. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090042
94
LoodC.ArveS.LedbetterJ.ElkonK. B. (2017). TLR7/8 activation in neutrophils impairs immune complex phagocytosis through shedding of FcgRIIA.J. Exp. Med.2142103–2119. 10.1084/jem.20161512
95
LoureiroA.PaisC.SampaioP. (2019). Relevance of macrophage extracellular traps in C. albicans killing.Front. Immunol.10:2767. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02767
96
LunX.YangW.AlainT.ShiZ.-Q.MuzikH.BarrettJ. W.et al (2005). Myxoma virus is a novel oncolytic virus with significant antitumor activity against experimental human gliomas.Cancer Res.659982–9990. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1201
97
MalachowaN.KobayashiS. D.FreedmanB.DorwardD. W.DeLeoF. R. (2013). Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin GH promotes formation of neutrophil extracellular traps.J. Immunol.1916022–6029. 10.4049/jimmunol.1301821
98
MalawistaS. E.SmithE. O.SeibylJ. P. (2006). Cryopreservable neutrophil surrogates: granule-poor, motile cytoplasts from polymorphonuclear leukocytes home to inflammatory lesions in vivo.Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton63254–257. 10.1002/cm.20120
99
MalawistaS. E.Van BlaricomG.BreitensteinM. G. (1989). Cryopreservable neutrophil surrogates. Stored cytoplasts from human polymorphonuclear leukocytes retain chemotactic, phagocytic, and microbicidal function.J. Clin. Invest.83728–732. 10.1172/JCI113939
100
ManzenreiterR. (2012). Ultrastructural characterization of cystic fibrosis sputum using atomic force and scanning electron microscopy.J. Cyst. Fibros.1184–92. 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.09.008
101
MarksM. I.PaiC. H.LafleurL. (2018). Yersinia enterocolitica gastroenteritis in children and their families.J. Pediatr.9695–104. 10.1201/9781351077804-9
102
MartinelliS.UrosevicM.DaryadelA.OberholzerP. A.BaumannC.FeyM. F.et al (2004). Induction of genes mediating interferon-dependent extracellular trap formation during neutrophil differentiation.J. Biol. Chem.27944123–44132. 10.1074/jbc.M405883200
103
MartinezR.SariskyR. T.WeberP. C.WellerS. K. (1996). Herpes simplex virus type 1 alkaline nuclease is required for efficient processing of viral DNA replication intermediates.J. Virol.702075–2085. 10.1128/JVI.70.4.2075-2085.1996
104
McIlroyD. J.JarnickiA. G.AuG. G.LottN.SmithD. W.HansbroP. M.et al (2014). Mitochondrial DNA neutrophil extracellular traps are formed after trauma and subsequent surgery.J. Crit. Care291133.e1–1133.e5. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.07.013
105
MeherA. K.SpinosaM.DavisJ. P.PopeN.LaubachV. E.SuG.et al (2018). Novel role of IL (Interleukin)-1β in neutrophil extracellular trap formation and abdominal aortic aneurysms.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.38843–853. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309897
106
MenegazziR.DeclevaE.DriP. (2012). Killing by neutrophil extracellular traps: fact or folklore?Blood1191214–1216. 10.1182/blood-2011-07-364604
107
MetzlerK. D.GoosmannC.LubojemskaA.ZychlinskyA.PapayannopoulosV. (2014). Myeloperoxidase-containing complex regulates neutrophil elastase release and actin dynamics during NETosis.Cell Rep.8883–896. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.044
108
MiddletonE. A.HeX.-Y.DenormeF.CampbellR. A.NgD.SalvatoreS. P.et al (2020). Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.Blood1361169–1179. 10.1182/blood.2020007008
109
MohananS.HoribataS.McElweeJ. L.DannenbergA. J.CoonrodS. A. (2013). Identification of macrophage extracellular trap-like structures in mammary gland adipose tissue: a preliminary study.Front. Immunol.4:67. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00067
110
MöllerhermH.NeumannA.SchilcherK.BlodkampS.ZeitouniN. E.DerschP.et al (2015). Yersinia enterocolitica-mediated degradation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs).FEMS Microbiol. Lett.362:fnv192. 10.1093/femsle/fnv192
111
MónacoA.Canales-HuertaN.Jara-WildeJ.HärtelS.ChabalgoityJ. A.MorenoM.et al (2021). Typhimurium triggers extracellular traps release in murine macrophages.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.11:639768. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.639768
112
MooiF. R.van LooI. H. M.van GentM.HeQ.BartM. J.HeuvelmanK. J.et al (2009). Bordetella pertussis strains with increased toxin production associated with pertussis resurgence.Emerg. Infect. Dis.151206–1213. 10.3201/eid1508.081511
113
MoonA. F.KrahnJ. M.LuX.CuneoM. J.PedersenL. C. (2016). Structural characterization of the virulence factor Sda1 nuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes.Nucleic Acids Res.443946–3957. 10.1093/nar/gkw143
114
MorshedM.HlushchukR.SimonD.WallsA. F.Obata-NinomiyaK.KarasuyamaH.et al (2014). NADPH oxidase–independent formation of extracellular DNA traps by basophils.J. Immunol.1925314–5323. 10.4049/jimmunol.1303418
115
MorshedM.YousefiS.StöckleC.SimonH. U.SimonD. (2012). Thymic stromal lymphopoietin stimulates the formation of eosinophil extracellular traps.Allergy671127–1137. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02868.x
116
MukherjeeM.LacyP.UekiS. (2018). Eosinophil extracellular traps and inflammatory pathologies—untangling the web!Front. Immunol.9:2763. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02763
117
MunizV. S.SilvaJ. C.BragaY. A. V.MeloR. C. N.UekiS.TakedaM.et al (2018). Eosinophils release extracellular DNA traps in response to Aspergillus fumigatus.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.141571.e7–585.e7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.048
118
Muñoz-CaroT.SilvaL. M. R.RitterC.TaubertA.HermosillaC. (2014). Besnoitia besnoiti tachyzoites induce monocyte extracellular trap formation.Parasitol. Res.1134189–4197. 10.1007/s00436-014-4094-3
119
MuraroS. P.De SouzaG. F.GalloS. W.Da SilvaB. K.De OliveiraS. D.VinoloM. A. R.et al (2018). Respiratory Syncytial Virus induces the classical ROS-dependent NETosis through PAD-4 and necroptosis pathways activation.Sci. Rep.8:14166. 10.1038/s41598-018-32576-y
120
NaimieA.KellerA. E.StoverC. K.LalithaP. (2016). Association of biofilm formation, Psl exopolysaccharide expression, and clinical outcomes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis: analysis of isolates in the steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial.JAMA Ophthalmol.134383–389. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5956
121
NakazawaD.ShidaH.KusunokiY.MiyoshiA.NishioS.TomaruU.et al (2016). The responses of macrophages in interaction with neutrophils that undergo NETosis.J. Autoimmun.6719–28. 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.08.018
122
NaqviN.AhujaK.SelvapandiyanA.DeyR.NakhasiH.PuriN. (2017). Role of Mast Cells in clearance of Leishmania through extracellular trap formation.Sci. Rep.71–16. 10.1038/s41598-017-12753-1
123
NelsonG. E.PondoT.ToewsK.-A.FarleyM. M.LindegrenM. L.LynfieldR.et al (2016). Epidemiology of invasive group A streptococcal infections in the United States, 2005-2012.Clin. Infect. Dis.63478–486. 10.1093/cid/ciw248
124
OmokawaA.UekiS.KikuchiY.TakedaM.AsanoM.SatoK.et al (2018). Mucus plugging in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: implication of the eosinophil DNA traps.Allergol. Int.67280–282. 10.1016/j.alit.2017.08.002
125
PapayannopoulosV.MetzlerK. D.HakkimA.ZychlinskyA. (2010). Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps.J. Cell Biol.191677–691. 10.1083/jcb.201006052
126
PapayannopoulosV.ZychlinskyA. (2009). NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons.Trends Immunol.30513–521. 10.1016/j.it.2009.07.011
127
PeñalozaH. F.AhnD.SchultzB. M.Piña-IturbeA.GonzálezL. A.BuenoS. M. (2020). L-arginine enhances intracellular killing of carbapenem-resistant ST258 by murine neutrophils.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.10:571771. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.571771
128
PilsczekF. H.SalinaD.PoonK. K. H.FaheyC.YippB. G.SibleyC. D.et al (2010). A novel mechanism of rapid nuclear neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Staphylococcus aureus.J. Immunol.1857413–7425. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000675
129
PodschunR.UllmannU. (1998). Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.11589–603. 10.1128/CMR.11.4.589
130
PujhariS.PaulS.AhluwaliaJ.RasgonJ. L. (2020). Clotting disorder in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.Rev. Med. Virol.31:e2177. 10.1002/rmv.2177
131
QueenJ.SatchellK. J. F. (2012). Neutrophils are essential for containment of Vibrio cholerae to the intestine during the proinflammatory phase of infection.Infect. Immun.802905–2913. 10.1128/IAI.00356-12
132
RadaB.JendrysikM. A.PangL.HayesC. P.YooD.-G.ParkJ. J.et al (2013). Pyocyanin-enhanced neutrophil extracellular trap formation requires the NADPH oxidase.PLoS One8:e54205. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054205
133
RahmanM. M.McFaddenG. (2020). Oncolytic virotherapy with myxoma virus.J. Clin. Med. Res.9:171. 10.3390/jcm9010171
134
RamazanzadehR.RoshaniD.ShakibP.RouhiS. (2015). Prevalence and occurrence rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Haarlem family multi-drug resistant in the worldwide population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Res. Med. Sci.2078–88.
135
RazakN. A.ElaskalaniO.MetharomP. (2017). Pancreatic cancer-induced neutrophil extracellular traps: a potential contributor to cancer-associated thrombosis.Int. J. Mol. Sci.18:487. 10.3390/ijms18030487
136
ReichelM.Muñoz-CaroT.Sanchez ContrerasG.Rubio GarcíaA.MagdowskiG.GärtnerU.et al (2015). Harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) PMN and monocytes release extracellular traps to capture the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii.Dev. Comp. Immunol.50106–115. 10.1016/j.dci.2015.02.002
137
Rey-JuradoE.KalergisA. M. (2017). Immunological features of respiratory syncytial virus-caused pneumonia-implications for vaccine design.Int. J. Mol. Sci.18:556. 10.3390/ijms18030556
138
RiyapaD.BuddhisaS.KorbsrisateS.CuccuiJ.WrenB. W.StevensM. P.et al (2012). Neutrophil extracellular traps exhibit antibacterial activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei and are influenced by bacterial and host factors.Infect. Immun.803921–3929. 10.1128/IAI.00806-12
139
RochaelN. C.Guimarães-CostaA. B.NascimentoM. T. C.Desouza-VieiraT. S.OliveiraM. P.Garciae SouzaL. F.et al (2015). Classical ROS-dependent and early/rapid ROS-independent release of neutrophil extracellular traps triggered by Leishmania parasites.Sci. Rep.51–11. 10.1038/srep18302
140
RodriguesD. A. S.PrestesE. B.GamaA. M. S.de Souza SilvaL.PinheiroA. A. S.RibeiroJ. M. C.et al (2020). CXCR4 and MIF are required for neutrophil extracellular trap release triggered by Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes.PLoS Pathog.16:e1008230. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008230
141
RyuS.CowlingB. J. (2020). Human influenza epidemiology.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.11:a038356. 10.1101/cshperspect.a038356
142
SaitohT.KomanoJ.SaitohY.MisawaT.TakahamaM.KozakiT.et al (2012). Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate a host defense response to human immunodeficiency virus-1.Cell Host Microbe12109–116. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.05.015
143
SaraswathiP.BeuermanR. W. (2015). Corneal biofilms: from planktonic to microcolony formation in an experimental keratitis infection with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa.Ocul. Surf.13331–345. 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.07.001
144
ScharrigE.CarestiaA.FerrerM. F.CédolaM.PretreG.DrutR.et al (2015). Neutrophil extracellular traps are involved in the innate immune response to infection with leptospira.PLoS Negl Trop Dis.9:e0003927. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003927
145
SegalA. W. (2005). How neutrophils kill microbes.Annu. Rev. Immunol.23197–223. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115653
146
SeperA.HosseinzadehA.GorkiewiczG.LichteneggerS.RoierS.LeitnerD. R.et al (2013). Vibrio cholerae evades neutrophil extracellular traps by the activity of two extracellular nucleases.PLoS Pathog.9:e1003614. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003614
147
ShenF.TangX.ChengW.WangY.WangC.ShiX.et al (2016). Fosfomycin enhances phagocyte-mediated killing of Staphylococcus aureus by extracellular traps and reactive oxygen species.Sci. Rep.61–15. 10.1038/srep19262
148
SimonD.HoesliS.RothN.StaedlerS.YousefiS.SimonH. U. (2011). Eosinophil extracellular DNA traps in skin diseases.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.127194–199. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.002
149
SotoJ. A.GálvezN. M. S.RiveraC. A.PalavecinoC. E.CéspedesP. F.Rey-JuradoE.et al (2018). Recombinant BCG vaccines reduce Pneumovirus-caused airway pathology by inducing protective humoral immunity.Front. Immunol.9:2875. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02875
150
SouzaP. S. S.BarbosaL. V.DinizL. F. A.da SilvaG. S.LopesB. R. P.SouzaP. M. R.et al (2018). Neutrophil extracellular traps possess anti-human respiratory syncytial virus activity: possible interaction with the viral F protein.Virus Res.25168–77. 10.1016/j.virusres.2018.04.001
151
SpezialeP.PietrocolaG. (2021). Staphylococcus aureus induces neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and neutralizes their bactericidal potential.Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.193451–3457. 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.012
152
StaceyH. D.GolubevaD.PoscaA.AngJ. C.NovakowskiK. E.ZahoorM. A.et al (2021). IgA potentiates NETosis in response to viral infection.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2021.01.04.424830
153
StevensD. L. (1992). Invasive group A Streptococcus infections.Clin. Infect. Dis.142–11.
154
StoikouM.GrimolizziF.GiaglisS.SchäferG.van BredaS. V.HoesliI. M.et al (2017). Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with altered neutrophil activity. Front. Immunol. 8:702. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00702
155
StoristeanuD. M. L.PocockJ. M.CowburnA. S.JussJ. K.NadesalingamA.NizetV.et al (2017). Evasion of neutrophil extracellular traps by respiratory pathogens.Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.56423–431. 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0193PS
156
SunE.LiuK.LeiM.WangL.NianX.LiL.et al (2020). BCG induced neutrophil extracellular traps formation and its regulatory mechanism.Res. Square[Epub ahead of print]. 10.21203/rs.2.15638/v2
157
Sur ChowdhuryC.GiaglisS.WalkerU. A.BuserA.HahnS.HaslerP. (2014). Enhanced neutrophil extracellular trap generation in rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of underlying signal transduction pathways and potential diagnostic utility. Arthritis Res. Ther. 16:R122. 10.1186/ar4579
158
TengT. S.JiA. L.JiX. Y.LiY. Z. (2017). Neutrophils and immunity: from bactericidal action to being conquered.J. Immunol. Res.2017:9671604. 10.1155/2017/9671604
159
ThammavongsaV.MissiakasD. M.SchneewindO. (2013). Staphylococcus aureus degrades neutrophil extracellular traps to promote immune cell death.Science342863–866. 10.1126/science.1242255
160
ThanabalasuriarA.ScottB. N. V.PeiselerM.WillsonM. E.ZengZ.WarrenerP.et al (2019). Neutrophil extracellular traps confine Pseudomonas aeruginosa ocular biofilms and restrict brain invasion.Cell Host Microbe25526.e4–536.e4. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.007
161
TheodorZ. (2013). The immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in humans.Tuberculosis Curr. Issues Diagn. Manag.12115–123. 10.5772/54986
162
ThiamH. R.WongS. L.QiuR.KittisopikulM.VahabikashiA.GoldmanA. E.et al (2020). NETosis proceeds by cytoskeleton and endomembrane disassembly and PAD4-mediated chromatin decondensation and nuclear envelope rupture.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1177326–7337. 10.1073/pnas.1909546117
163
ThomasC. J.SchroderK. (2013). Pattern recognition receptor function in neutrophils.Trends Immunol.34317–328. 10.1016/j.it.2013.02.008
164
ToussaintM.JacksonD. J.SwiebodaD.GuedánA.TsourouktsoglouT. D.ChingY. M.et al (2017). Host DNA released by NETosis promotes rhinovirus-induced type-2 allergic asthma exacerbation.Nat. Med.23681–691. 10.1038/nm.4332
165
UchiyamaS.DöhrmannS.TimmerA. M.DixitN.GhochaniM.BhandariT.et al (2015). Streptolysin O rapidly impairs neutrophil oxidative burst and antibacterial responses to Group A Streptococcus.Front. Immunol.6:581. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00581
166
UekiS.KonnoY.TakedaM.MoritokiY.HirokawaM.MatsuwakiY.et al (2016). Eosinophil extracellular trap cell death-derived DNA traps: their presence in secretions and functional attributes.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.137258–267. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.041
167
UekiS.MeloR. C. N.GhiranI.SpencerL. A.DvorakA. M.WellerP. F. (2013). Eosinophil extracellular DNA trap cell death mediates lytic release of free secretion-competent eosinophil granules in humans.Blood1212074–2083. 10.1182/blood-2012-05-432088
168
UrbanC.XiongX.SohnK.SchröppelK.BrunnerH.RuppS. (2005). The moonlighting protein Tsa1p is implicated in oxidative stress response and in cell wall biogenesis in Candida albicans.Mol. Microbiol.571318–1341. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04771.x
169
UrbanC. F.ErmertD.SchmidM.Abu-AbedU.GoosmannC.NackenW.et al (2009). Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against Candida albicans.PLoS Pathog.5:e1000639. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000639
170
VerasF. P.PontelliM. C.SilvaC. M.Toller-KawahisaJ. E.de LimaM.NascimentoD. C.et al (2020). SARS-CoV-2-triggered neutrophil extracellular traps mediate COVID-19 pathology.J. Exp. Med.217:e20201129. 10.1084/jem.20201129
171
Von Köckritz-BlickwedeM.GoldmannO.ThulinP.HeinemannK.Norrby-TeglundA.RohdeM.et al (2008). Phagocytosis-independent antimicrobial activity of mast cells by means of extracellular trap formation.Blood1113070–3080. 10.1182/blood-2007-07-104018
172
VorobjevaN. (2020). Mitochondrial permeability transition pore is involved in oxidative burst and NETosis of human neutrophils.Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis.1866:165664. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165664
173
WahlB.O’BrienK. L.GreenbaumA.MajumderA.LiuL.ChuY.et al (2018). Burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in children in the era of conjugate vaccines: global, regional, and national estimates for 2000-15.Lancet Glob. Health6e744–e757. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30247-X
174
WangH.LiT.ChenS.GuY.YeS. (2015). Neutrophil extracellular trap mitochondrial DNA and its autoantibody in systemic lupus erythematosus and a proof-of-concept trial of metformin.Arthr. Rheumatol.673190–3200. 10.1002/art.39296
175
WangH.ZhangH.WangY.BrownZ. J.XiaY.HuangZ.et al (2021). Regulatory T-cell and neutrophil extracellular trap interaction contributes to carcinogenesis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.J. Hepatol.751271–1283. 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.032
176
WangL.ZhouX.YinY.MaiY.WangD.ZhangX. (2018). Hyperglycemia induces neutrophil extracellular traps formation through an NADPH oxidase-dependent pathway in diabetic retinopathy.Front. Immunol.9:3076. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03076
177
WarthaF.BeiterK.AlbigerB.FernebroJ.ZychlinskyA.NormarkS.et al (2007). Capsule and D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids protect Streptococcus pneumoniae against neutrophil extracellular traps.Cell. Microbiol.91162–1171. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00857.x
178
WatanabeM.NagaiM. (2004). Whooping cough due to Bordetella parapertussis: an unresolved problem.Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther.2447–454. 10.1586/14787210.2.3.447
179
WebsterS. J.DaigneaultM.BewleyM. A.PrestonJ. A.MarriottH. M.WalmsleyS. R.et al (2010). Distinct cell death programs in monocytes regulate innate responses following challenge with common causes of invasive bacterial disease.J. Immunol.1852968–2979. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000805
180
WiltonM.HalversonT. W. R.Charron-MazenodL.ParkinsM. D.LewenzaS. (2018). Secreted phosphatase and deoxyribonuclease are required by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to defend against neutrophil extracellular traps.Infect. Immun.86e403–e418. 10.1128/IAI.00403-18
181
WongK. W.JacobsW. R. (2013). Mycobacterium tuberculosis exploits human interferon γ to stimulate macrophage extracellular trap formation and necrosis.J. Infect. Dis.208109–119. 10.1093/infdis/jit097
182
WongS. L.DemersM.MartinodK.GallantM.WangY.GoldfineA. B.et al (2015). Diabetes primes neutrophils to undergo NETosis, which impairs wound healing. Nat. Med. 21, 815–819. 10.1038/nm.3887
183
XuJ.ZhangX.PelayoR.MonestierM.AmmolloC. T.SemeraroF.et al (2009). Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis.Nat. Med.151318–1321. 10.1038/nm.2053
184
Yagüe-MuñozA.Arnedo-PenaA.Herrera-LeónS.Meseguer-FerrerN.Vizcaíno-BatllésA.Romeu-GarcíaM. Àet al (2019). Descriptive epidemiology of Yersinia enterocolitica infection in a high-incidence area over an 8-year period, 2006–2013. EDICS project.Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin.37441–447. 10.1016/j.eimc.2018.11.002
185
YamamotoT.KidaY.SakamotoY.KuwanoK. (2017). Mpn491, a secreted nuclease of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, plays a critical role in evading killing by neutrophil extracellular traps.Cell. Microbiol.19:e12666. 10.1111/cmi.12666
186
YippB. G.PetriB.SalinaD.JenneC. N.ScottB. N. V.ZbytnuikL. D.et al (2012). Infection-induced NETosis is a dynamic process involving neutrophil multitasking in vivo.Nat. Med.181386–1393. 10.1038/nm.2847
187
YousefiS.GoldJ. A.AndinaN.LeeJ. J.KellyA. M.KozlowskiE.et al (2008). Catapult-like release of mitochondrial DNA by eosinophils contributes to antibacterial defense.Nat. Med.14949–953. 10.1038/nm.1855
188
YousefiS.MihalacheC.KozlowskiE.SchmidI.SimonH. U. (2009). Viable neutrophils release mitochondrial DNA to form neutrophil extracellular traps.Cell Death Diff.161438–1444. 10.1038/cdd.2009.96
189
YousefiS.MorshedM.AminiP.StojkovD.SimonD.Von GuntenS.et al (2015). Basophils exhibit antibacterial activity through extracellular trap formation.Allergy701184–1188. 10.1111/all.12662
190
YousefiS.SimonH.-U. (2016). NETosis – does it really represent nature’s “Suicide Bomber”?Front. Immunol.7:328. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00328
191
ZhuL.KuangZ.WilsonB. A.LauG. W. (2013). Competence-independent activity of pneumococcal enda mediates degradation of extracellular DNA and nets and is important for virulence.PLoS One8:e70363. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070363
192
ZhuL.LiuL.ZhangY.PuL.LiuJ.LiX.et al (2018). High level of neutrophil extracellular traps correlates with poor prognosis of severe influenza a infection.J. Infect. Dis.217428–437. 10.1093/infdis/jix475
193
ZuoY.YalavarthiS.ShiH.GockmanK.ZuoM.MadisonJ. A.et al (2020). Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19.JCI Insight5:e138999. 10.1172/jci.insight.138999
Summary
Keywords
neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), virulence factor, bacterial infection, viral infection, extracellular traps (ETs)
Citation
Schultz BM, Acevedo OA, Kalergis AM and Bueno SM (2022) Role of Extracellular Trap Release During Bacterial and Viral Infection. Front. Microbiol. 13:798853. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.798853
Received
20 October 2021
Accepted
04 January 2022
Published
26 January 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Caterina Guzmán-Verri, National University of Costa Rica, Costa Rica
Reviewed by
Marcin Zawrotniak, Jagiellonian University, Poland; Luis A. Castillo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Ronald Anderson, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Stavros Giaglis, University of Basel, Switzerland
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Schultz, Acevedo, Kalergis and Bueno.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Susan M. Bueno, sbueno@bio.puc.cl
This article was submitted to Infectious Agents and Disease, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.