Abstract
Cryopeg brines are isolated volumes of hypersaline water in subzero permafrost. The cryopeg system at Utqiaġvik, Alaska, is estimated to date back to 40 ka BP or earlier, a remnant of a late Pleistocene Ocean. Surprisingly, the cryopeg brines contain high concentrations of organic carbon, including extracellular polysaccharides, and high densities of bacteria. How can these physiologically extreme, old, and geologically isolated systems support such an ecosystem? This study addresses this question by examining the energetics of the Utqiaġvik cryopeg brine ecosystem. Using literature-derived assumptions and new measurements on archived borehole materials, we first estimated the quantity of organic carbon when the system formed. We then considered two bacterial growth trajectories to calculate the lower and upper bounds of the cell-specific metabolic rate of these communities. These bounds represent the first community estimates of metabolic rate in a subzero hypersaline environment. To assess the plausibility of the different growth trajectories, we developed a model of the organic carbon cycle and applied it to three borehole scenarios. We also used dissolved inorganic carbon and nitrogen measurements to independently estimate the metabolic rate. The model reconstructs the growth trajectory of the microbial community and predicts the present-day cell density and organic carbon content. Model input included measured rates of the in-situ enzymatic conversion of particulate to dissolved organic carbon under subzero brine conditions. A sensitivity analysis of model parameters was performed, revealing an interplay between growth rate, cell-specific metabolic rate, and extracellular enzyme activity. This approach allowed us to identify plausible growth trajectories consistent with the observed bacterial densities in the cryopeg brines. We found that the cell-specific metabolic rate in this system is relatively high compared to marine sediments. We attribute this finding to the need to invest energy in the production of extracellular enzymes, for generating bioavailable carbon from particulate organic carbon, and the production of extracellular polysaccharides for cryoprotection and osmoprotection. These results may be relevant to other isolated systems in the polar regions of Earth and to possible ice-bound brines on worlds such as Europa, Enceladus, and Mars.
1. Introduction
On Earth, bacteria often encounter energy-limited environments. Their prevalent physiological state is understood to be energy-limited (). For example, the vast subsurface biosphere is energy-limited (), yet sustains abundant microbial life (; ). Understanding the strategies that allow bacteria to survive in such extreme environments prompts the question: what is their minimum metabolic requirement? Here we investigate the energetic needs over time of bacterial communities in cryopeg brine, a subzero hypersaline environment geologically isolated from surface inputs. We seek to answer the question posed by estimating the cell-specific metabolic rates of the bacterial communities residing in these extreme settings.
Cryopeg brines are considered extreme for various reasons, one of which is their assumed energetic isolation. These brines are volumes of hypersaline subzero liquid water found in permafrost well below the surface. The Utqiaġvik system of cryopegs in the high Alaskan Arctic at approximately 8 m below surface has a temperature around −6°C and total salt concentration around 120 ppt (). Carbon-14 (14C) measurements suggest the brines have been enclosed for approximately 40 ka BP (). Two types of cryopeg brines exist within the permafrost here: those encased by a layer of frozen marine sediments and those encased by massive ice. Both types are thought to be isolated hydrologically (). Together, these properties describe an environment that is not only energy-limited, but also energetically costly to inhabit due to challenging conditions. Despite these conditions, cell densities range from 105 to 108 cells mL−1 brine (), comparable to previously sampled cryopeg brines across the Arctic (, ; ). Metagenomic analyses show the presence of overwhelmingly heterotrophic bacterial communities dependent on organic carbon for their source of energy (; ).
Investigations of cryopeg systems are relevant not only to our understanding of Earth-bound ecosystems but, excitingly, can inform our understanding of possible extraterrestrial life. Life within the icy mantles of Europa or Enceladus, and possibly the subsurface of Mars, could be inhabiting similarly extreme, energy-limited environments (; ; ; ). To our knowledge, no estimate of cell-specific metabolic rate in subzero hypersaline environments is available. The objective of this study was to develop such estimates and contribute to our understanding of the habitability of subsurface subzero brines, be they Earth-bound or extraterrestrial.
We considered that the key to understanding the Utqiaġvik cryopeg system was to reconcile high cell densities with potential microbial kinetics and the available energy pool. We hypothesized that the minimum metabolic rate of the brine residents would be relatively high due to the extreme conditions and corresponding need to synthesize protective compounds, making the requirement for organic carbon correspondingly high to account for the observed cell densities. To test this hypothesis, we first made a series of simplifying assumptions to enable a first-order analysis of the system. The objective was to estimate the cell-specific metabolic rate of a resident community, assuming organic carbon as the sole energy source and considering two microbial growth trajectories to provide an upper and lower bound of this rate. This approach required us to measure the quantity of organic carbon in the sediments surrounding the brines. We then constructed a model of the organic carbon cycle within the brine, which allowed us to reconstruct microbial growth trajectories and relate them to available organic carbon. A sensitivity analysis of model parameters was performed to understand their relevance to model results and thus the limitations of our model. These parameters included the enzymatic conversion of particulate organic carbon (POC) to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the brine. POC represents the dominant form of organic carbon in surrounding permafrost yet is not available to bacteria until hydrolyzed to smaller molecular weight compounds (DOC).
Finally, we compared the model predictions to the available observations, which together allowed us to propose the system’s microbial history under energetic isolation. We produced plausible simulations hinging on the precision of key parameters, and thus could identify research areas that would further advance understanding of bacterial energetics in extreme environments.
2. Physical and biological context for the model
To provide context for our model we outline the relevant environmental characteristics of cryopeg brines in this section. The physical characteristics guided the development of the equations governing environmental interactions in the model. Microbial energetics of the bacteria found in the cryopeg brine constrained our analyses and provided an understanding of the biology that the model attempts to resolve. Together, the physics and biology of the cryopeg brine underlie the design of our work, and the thoughts behind the analyses conducted.
2.1. Physical characteristics of cryopeg brines
Cryopeg brines are volumes of hypersaline water that occur in cryopeg, a basal layer in permafrost of unfrozen sediment perennially at subzero temperatures (). The brines studied herein were collected from below the Barrow Permafrost Tunnel at a depth of approximately 8 m below the surface, on the northernmost coast of Alaska. They are thought to have formed from saturated marine sediments in a lagoonal environment (). As sea level fell during glaciation, these sediments would have been exposed to the atmosphere and become desiccated, causing previously dissolved solutes to concentrate and, following entrainment into permafrost, depress the freezing point of water to yield brine (, ; ). This cryoconcentration effect leads to high salinities and possibly to concentrated organic matter. The marine origin of these brines is supported by ionic and microbiological evidence (; ). The temperature of these Alaskan brines perennially falls within a narrow range of −6 to −8°C and is thought to have remained within this range over their lifespan (; ; ; ). The salinity of these brines ranges from 109 to 140‰ salt (). These brines are hydrologically isolated from each other as evidenced by the different pressure heads and equilibrium brine levels (). Moreover, the combination of ice content plugging sediment pores and bacteria attached to surfaces is thought to preclude input of cells into the brine from the surrounding environment (). However, possible input during partial melting at the brine/ice boundary cannot be excluded given slight seasonal temperature oscillations. They may be relevant to the observed microbiological similarities between proximate massive ice and sediment brines ().
The Utqiaġvik cryopeg system presents brines encased by marine sediments, as previously observed in other cryopegs, as well as those newly discovered to be encased by massive ice, respectively called intra-sediment and intra-ice brines (). Intra-ice brines are thought to have migrated along the temperature gradient into the massive ice around 11 ka BP. This migration is suggested by the equal age of organic carbon in the brine and the massive ice surrounding it ().
We considered brines sampled from three distinct cryopeg boreholes in the Barrow Permafrost Tunnel (Figure 1): two intra-sediment brines from boreholes CB1 and CB4, and one intra-ice brine from borehole CBIW. CBIW was sampled twice, in 2017 and 2018. All brines were sampled in May and were at −6°C when sampled, with salinities of 115, 121 and 140‰ salt, respectively (). No in situ oxygen measurements have been made in these or other tunnel boreholes, but anaerobic conditions are expected within the brines ().
Figure 1
Cryopeg brines considered here featured POC concentrations of 2–12 mM and DOC concentrations of 30–102 mM, which are high when compared to the typical micromolar concentrations in seawater (
2.2. Microbial energetics of cryopeg brines
Across the Arctic, cryopeg brines have been found to harbor sizeable microbial communities, ranging between 105 and 108 cells mL−1 (
The dominant bacterium in the brines from CB1 and CBIW, two of the brines we considered in this study, was a novel species of Marinobacter, recently brought into culture (
Organisms reliant upon a range of metabolisms have been detected in cryopeg brines, including heterotrophs, sulfate reducers, acetogens and methanogens (
For a heterotrophic Psychrobacter sp. isolated from Siberian cryopeg,
Constrained habitat volume and high cell density in cryopeg brines lead to higher rates of cell-to-cell (and virus-to-cell) contact than occur in seawater. Increased cell-to-cell contact rates exacerbate resource and space competition. An analysis of cryopeg brine metagenomes found high abundance of cells associated with the type VI secretion system and microcin C, both tools to lyse neighboring competitors (
Moreover, cryopeg brines host abundant viral communities of marine origin that appear to have mediated the exchange of genetic information (
The required production of certain compounds may also increase the energetic cost of life in this system. Subzero brines are relatively viscous (
Although the current genomic data available provide promising insights into the metabolisms supported by cryopeg brines, they do not allow us to determine whether these brines have supported energetically isolated microbial communities for 40,000 years. To understand the energetics of the Utqiaġvik brines, their energetic histories need to be reconstructed. This effort necessarily involves the reconstruction of the microbial growth trajectory over the lifespan of the brine. Figure 2 illustrates several possible growth trajectories. The different fluctuations or constancy in cell densities over time in each case lead to different energetic requirements. Simplistically, a community that spent most of its history at 105 cells mL−1 will not require the same amount of energy as one at 108 cells mL−1. More complex trajectories could also have occurred, such as when a microbial community declines due to insufficient energy, then recovers after an energy input (e.g., when intra-sediment brine is assumed to have migrated into massive ice).
Figure 2

Hypothetical growth trajectories to account for a given endpoint cell density. Four possible cases for growth are illustrated here to describe why endpoint measurements leave open many possible trajectories. The case for rapid initial growth followed by stasis is presented in blue. The case for slow growth leading to the observed cell density is presented in green. In red, an intermediate growth rate, followed by decline due to insufficient energy and then an input of organic carbon (OC), depicts recovery of the community to the given endpoint. The no growth scenario, requiring the starting community to be as dense as the endpoint, is indicated by the dashed purple line. Growth lines are intended to be logarithmic, but all lines are conceptual (not drawn to scale).
3. Materials and methods
Here we indicate the methods used to quantify key variables, such as organic carbon, and show the equations developed to model the different processes involved in microbial energetics. Along with the mathematical outline of our model, we also present fundamental assumptions and limitations. All of the code used to describe and calculate the equations below and plot the results shown is available online on GitHub. The contents of this paper were generated from the most recent commit on the “paper” branch. Python v3.9 and Julia v1.8.2 (
3.1. Organic carbon and nitrogen in sediment and massive ice
To determine the POC content of sediments surrounding the cryopeg brines, we used the method of
To convert our sediment carbon measurements to in-situ concentrations we assumed a dry sediment density of 2.625 g mL−1, the average of the density of kaolinite and sand. This assumption is guided by the fact that nearby sediment is composed of undefined clay minerals and sand (
To determine DOC of porewater in the frozen sediment surrounding the cryopeg brines, subsamples of the sediment and ice were shaved off core sections with a sterile scalpel onto sterile aluminum foil. These subsamples were placed in 50-cc polypropylene tubes, weighed, and allowed to thaw at 4°C for 15 min before centrifuging for 10 min at 2,000 rpm in a benchtop centrifuge (IEC, Model HN-SII IM201) at 2°C. The resulting supernatant was decanted and filtered into a clean EPA vial using a 0.2-μm syringe filter, then frozen until analyzed. The tube of leftover sediment was reweighed for porewater/sediment normalization. DOC was measured using a Shimadzu TOC-VCSH DOC analyzer according to standard protocols in the Marine Chemistry Lab (School of Oceanography, University of Washington). In the case of massive ice, we lacked suitable samples for DOC analysis, so measurements of dEPS (
3.2. Dissolved inorganic carbon
Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) was measured for a sample of CBIW brine taken in 2017 as an auxiliary to the 14C dating procedure (
3.3. Modeling scenarios
We considered three separate scenarios for modeling purposes. Each scenario is based on a unique occurrence of cryopeg brine below the permafrost tunnel. The scenarios are named after the borehole that yielded the brine they describe: CB1, CB4, and CBIW. The following variables define a scenario: brine cell density, brine POC and DOC concentration, surrounding POC and DOC concentration, post-enclosure carbon addition, bacterial growth rate, and carbon content per cell.
The CB1 scenario was chosen to represent the multiple intra-sediment brines in the Utqiaġvik region of common geology and microbial composition. It was paired with organic carbon measurements made on regional permafrost from the nearby Barrow Environmental Observatory (BEO). As the dominant organism in this brine was the newly isolated Marinobacter sp., its growth rate and a literature-informed approximation of its carbon content were used to represent the microbial community.
The CB4 scenario describes an intra-sediment brine that differs from the others in terms of its dominant organism, Psychrobacter sp. The published growth rate and carbon content for Arctic Psychrobacter sp. (
The CBIW scenario represents cryopeg brine encased in massive ice instead of sediment. This brine is thought to have originated as intra-sediment brine, then migrated upwards into massive ice around 11,000 years BP to become surrounded by ice. This 14C-dating provided evidence of a possible mechanism for addition of organic carbon from the ice into the brine (
Specific values for the variables we used to define a model scenario are provided in Table 1. For scenarios CB1 and CBIW, where Marinobacter sp. dominated the brine community, the cell carbon content, was taken from an average value for Arctic sea-ice bacteria from
Table 1
| Variable | Symbol (units) | CB1 scenario (sourcea) | CB4 scenario (sourcea) | CBIW scenario (sourcea) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell density | (cells mL−1) | 5.70 × 106 (CB1; | 1.14 × 107 (CB4; | 1.39 × 108 (CBIW; |
| Sediment POC | (fg C cm−3) | 1.64 × 1013 (BEO; this study) | 1.75 × 1013 (CB4; this study) | 1.64 × 1013 (BEO; this study) |
| Sediment DOC | (fg C cm−3) | 3.41 × 1010 (BEO; this study) | 6.17 × 1011 (CB4; this study) | 3.41 × 1010 (BEO; this study) |
| Brine POC | (fg C mL−1) | 1.49 × 1011 (CB1; | 4.97 × 1010 (CB4; | 2.38 × 1010 (CBIW; |
| Brine DOC | (fg C mL−1) | 1.23 × 1012 (CB1; | 1.02 × 1012 (CB4; | 3.60 × 1011 (CBIW; |
| Added DOCb | (fg C mL−1) | 0 | 0 | 3.88 × 1010 (massive ice; |
| Added POCb | (fg C mL−1) | 0 | 0 | 1.86 × 1010 (massive ice; |
| Cell carbon content | (fg C cell−1) | 15.7 ( | 54.04 ( | 15.7 ( |
| Net growth ratec | (day−1) | 0.06 ( | 0.016 ( | 0.06 ( |
Variables and values used to define each of three cryopeg brine scenarios.
aCB1, CB4, and CBIW indicate boreholes; BEO indicates Barrow Environmental Observatory. CB1 and CBIW were dominated by Marinobacter sp.; CB4, by Psychrobacter sp. bSingle addition at 29,000 years (11,000 years BP) into the 40,000-year trajectory. cNet (community) growth rate was set to the maximum growth rate of the dominant bacterium (see Section 3.7).
3.4. Cell-specific metabolic rate
A primary goal was to develop an equation to estimate the cell-specific metabolic rate of the microbial community, which is described below (Equation 1). The cell-specific metabolic rate term was inspired by
We assumed that the brine upon initial enclosure contained POC and DOC pools equivalent to those present in the continuously frozen material currently surrounding the brines. In the CBIW scenario, we considered the surroundings to have been equal in TOC content to regional frozen sediment at depth in the permafrost (sampled at BEO). We then took the difference between starting TOC and TOC measured in the brines. This calculation accounted for any carbon addition during the 40,000-year period by adding it to the starting TOC quantity. We subtracted from this difference the quantity of organic carbon diverted toward biomass.
To obtain bounds for our approximation we considered two cases of cell growth. The lower bound case requires the available quantity of organic carbon to be divided among as many cells as possible to minimize this per-cell quantity. This case corresponds to one in which no growth occurs (
To calculate the slowest possible rate of exponential growth, we determined the growth rate of a community over the simulation time of 40,000 years by fitting an exponential function between the starting cell density of 105 cells mL−1 and the observed ending cell density. The resulting rate is called the “minimum growth rate.” This approach assumes that the microbial community was growing over the entire lifespan of the enclosed brine, and hence does not allow for death or dormancy. Inherent to Equation 1 is that our system is feasible under the minimum growth rate with either cell-specific metabolic rate bounds.
The cell-specific metabolic rate, is given in femtograms of carbon per cell per day by:
where denotes the quantity of organic carbon content per cell in femtograms of carbon per cell; , the concentration of TOC in femtograms of carbon per milliliter; , the cell density in number of cells per milliliter, and and , the start and end times, respectively, in days. is any organic carbon added at time . Sympy v1.11.1 was used to calculate the integral (
3.5. Extracellular enzyme activity
Measurements of EEA in cryopeg brines are available (
where cell-specific EEA rate, , is given in femtograms of carbon per cell per day, and denotes quantity of POC. We thus considered the difference in POC quantity between the brine and its surroundings, accounting for any additional POC input to the brine, with the resulting quantity divided by cell density over time. The bounding growth trajectories were identical to those used to estimate the cell-specific metabolic rate. Using Equation 2, we could also predict the timespan of the system by replacing with measured EEA rate and solving for . We solved for the timespan using the growth case with the minimum calculated growth rate starting at 105 cells mL−1.
3.6. Model description
To determine the plausibility of the calculated cell-specific metabolic rate value, and to understand the energetic requirements of the system, we developed a model of the organic carbon cycle in Utqiaġvik cryopeg brines. In this section we offer a non-mathematical description and schematic representation (Figure 3) of the model. The central assumptions are presented in the next section.
Figure 3

Graphical representation of processes and quantities modeled for permafrost-enclosed cryopeg brine. Particulate organic carbon (POC) is shown as dark brown circles; dissolved organic carbon (DOC), as yellow semi-circles; and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), as black triangles. Extracellular enzymes (teal-colored shapes) produced and released by bacteria hydrolyze POC to DOC. Bacteria take up DOC, respiring it to dissolved DIC or assimilating it into biomass to grow and reproduce. They release DOC back to the brine upon death, attributed explicitly to starvation in the model.
The model keeps track of four quantities: POC, DOC, DIC, and cell abundance. Five processes structure these quantities: respiration of DOC to DIC by bacteria, cell growth, cell death, hydrolysis of POC to DOC by extracellular enzymes, and organic carbon additions to the system.
Here the rate of respiration, as well as all other utilizations of organic carbon (e.g., cell growth, production and release of extracellular compounds), is encompassed in the cell-specific metabolic rate. Each unit of organic carbon respired is removed from the DOC pool and added to the DIC pool. The quantity of DIC in the model runs presented here are modified solely by this cellular respiration of DOC. Cells grow according to an equation relating their maximum growth rate to substrate concentration (
As used in the CBIW scenario, the model allows for the addition of organic carbon to the system, beyond that available at time zero. A model feature not used here would allow consideration of a punctuated or a constant input of DIC through processes other than respiration, such as carbonate dissolution. Possible chemoautotrophy to remove DIC and generate new biomass (
3.7. Model assumptions and limitations
Due to the sparse data available on cryopeg brines, reconstructing their microbial history requires assumptions to obtain the first-order approximation of their energetics. These assumptions inherently introduce limitations to our results. We address the central assumptions here to contextualize our results.
A key assumption in our analyses is that the cryopeg brines started with an amount of organic carbon equivalent to the quantity observed in their contemporary surroundings. This assumption is required, as obtaining precise information on a cryopeg system at the time of its formation 40,000 years ago is not possible. The assumption is not unreasonable given the hydrological isolation of the brines and the temperatures that have kept their surroundings frozen throughout their lifetimes (
Our model does not account for diffusion of material throughout the brine, which neglects the likelihood of environmental niches (
We assumed that every cell in the system grows at the same rate. Of course, different subpopulations of cells express different phenotypes and levels of activity, including dormancy, at different times in their life histories. This assumption likely leads to an overestimation of the community growth rate and, in turn, an underestimation of the cell-specific metabolic rate. However, as will be seen in our results, the cell-specific metabolic rate compares reasonably well to existing estimations.
We also assumed that every cell in the system has the same carbon content throughout its lifetime. Of course, bacterial communities exhibit a range of cell sizes, with size and potentially content changing as a function of growth conditions, growth phase, starvation conditions, and dormancy. Until distribution data for cryopeg brines are obtained, the use of a uniform distribution of cell size and carbon content in our analyses leaves some uncertainty to our results. As will be seen, our model simulations are not overly sensitive to this parameter.
We have attributed cell death to starvation, but other processes can lead to cell death in these cryopeg brines. In particular, cell lysis following viral infection and “bacterial warfare” may contribute significantly (
We assumed that microbial community kinetics could be represented by those of the dominant bacterium. Many bacterial species exist within the cryopeg brine, each with presumably distinct kinetics. However, overall diversity was low and the dominant species was strongly dominant in each scenario considered, accounting for half or more of the community. Making this assumption allowed a first-order approximation despite the unknown complexities of community kinetics.
We assumed that all POC is inaccessible to the brine community until hydrolyzed enzymatically to DOC, and that all DOC is accessible and labile. An absence of data on the chemical composition and lability of either of these pools of organic carbon limits our analysis, as does the assumption that EEA rate is constant. Bacteria regulate their production of extracellular enzymes in response to environmental substrates, but we lack data to model this kinetic or enzyme lifetime. These assumptions could lead to biased results in EEA rate calculations and final carbon quantities (Supplementary Figure S1).
Finally, we assumed that organic compounds are the only limiting source of carbon, nutrients and energy for cell respiration and growth. Sources of inorganic nutrients are plentiful in cryopeg brines (
3.8. Model equations
The model was solved using the DifferentialEquations.jl package v7.6.0 (
The growth term, is solved with a straightforward Monod equation (
A logistic growth term has been added to cap the growth as the cell density, approaches carrying capacity, . If cell density declined to zero at the time of a carbon addition (e.g., in the CBIW scenario), we set to simulate a viable cell able to respond to the addition.
The death term, , corresponds to deaths by starvation (Equation 4):
This term accounts for the assumption that cells will lyse if they do not have enough substrate to maintain their integrity, i.e., cannot satisfy their metabolic need (). Other death-inducing processes such as viral infection or bacterial warfare are included implicitly in net growth rate (Equation 3). The net change in cell density is the difference between growth and death by starvation (Equation 5):
While the cell-specific EEA rate remains constant throughout our simulations, the absolute EEA rate, , must be lower or equal to the available quantity of substrate, . To satisfy this constraint, we used a minimum function (Equation 6):
where is the quantity of POC, which is given by the sum of two terms. The first term, represents any addition of POC into the system. The second term is the absolute EEA rate, subtracted to remove the quantity of POC hydrolyzed to DOC.
The quantity of DOC in the system is the sum of five terms (Equation 8):
The first term is any addition of organic carbon into the system, , which allows the simulation of single or repeated carbon additions from the surrounding environment into the cryopeg brine. The second term is DOC sequestered or released by biomass, equal to the change in cell abundance multiplied by the quantity of organic carbon per cell, . The third term accounts for the metabolism of the remaining population. The fourth term, is the quantity of POC converted to DOC by EEA. The final term simulates autotrophy in the system by taking a DIC fixation rate, which removes carbon from the DIC pool and adds to the DOC pool. This rate cannot be smaller than the quantity of DIC. In this work, we have set this term to zero, for lack of measurements of in cryopeg brines and expecting the rate to be minor based on metagenomic information (
The equation for change in DIC is constructed similarly, though the EEA term is absent as it need not be considered (Equation 9):
In this equation, is the quantity of DIC per cell. While and are set to zero here, they could be used in a future study to model autotrophy in this system.
3.9. Model inputs and simulations
In addition to the variables defined for each cryopeg brine scenario (Table 1), a set of constants were input to the model (Table 2). For each constant, we used the most accurate estimate we could find. In some cases, the chosen value was less relevant to our unique environment than we had hoped. However, given that we are striving for order of magnitude estimations, we expect these to be adequate, especially when considering the results of our sensitivity analysis (Sections 3.10 and 4.4).
Table 2
| Constant | Symbol (unit) | Value | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying capacity | (cells mL−1) | 109 | Assumed, based on Schmidt et al. (1998) |
| Monod half-velocity constant | (fg C mL−1) | 8.82 × 105 | Estimated from |
| Cell density at | (cells mL−1) | 105 | Assumed, based on density in coastal sea ice ( |
| Extracellular enzyme activity rate | (fg C cell−1 day−1) | 1.22 × 10−2 | Measured in CBIW ( |
| Simulation timespan | (years)a | 40,000 | Measured ( |
Constants used to model cryopeg brine scenarios.
aConverted to days for all calculations.
was derived by taking an average of the values for amino acid uptake rates measured at −1°C in Arctic seawater by Yager and Deming (1999), then taking the dissolved combined amino acids to be 41% carbon (as in
We ran simulations to obtain growth trajectories (changes in cell density over time) for each of the three cryopeg scenarios under different boundary conditions. Each simulation represents one of 8 unique combinations of the lower or upper bound of three variables: , , and . Simulations thus address minimum and maximum growth rate, lower and upper bound cell-specific metabolic rate, and calculated and measured extracellular enzyme activity. They also track POC and DOC during the 40,000-year time span of the resulting growth trajectories.
3.10. Sensitivity analysis
To understand how the accuracy of our estimates affect model results, we conducted a sensitivity analysis of model parameters. Using GlobalSensitivity.jl package v2.1.2 (
Briefly, this variance decomposition method varies each parameter within given bounds and measures the corresponding variance of the output. The resulting first-order Sobol index of a parameter is a measure of how much variance in the output can be attributed to that parameter. The total-effect Sobol index encompasses interactions between the variance of that parameter and the others in the analysis. The bounds passed for each parameter aim to encompass the range of microbiologically plausible values; these can be found in Table 3.
Table 3
| Parameter (units) | Lower bound | Upper bound |
|---|---|---|
| Growth rate (day−1) | 1 × 10−6 | 1 × 102 |
| Cell-specific metabolic rate (fg C cell−1 day−1) | 1 × 10−5 | 5 × 102 |
| Cell carbon content (fg C cell−1) | 1 × 102 | 5 × 102 |
| EEA rate (fg C cell−1 day−1) | 0 | 1 × 102 |
| Monod half-velocity constant (fg C) | 1 × 103 | 1 ×108 |
| Carrying capacity (cells mL−1) | 1 × 108 | 1 × 109 |
| Starting cell density (cells mL−1) | 1 | 1 × 108 |
Parameter bounds of the sensitivity analysis.
The sensitivity analysis was executed on the CB1 scenario, excluding environmental parameters. This choice was made to understand the influence of bacterial parameters, such as carbon content per cell and growth rate, on our results. Furthermore, these constitute the few parameters that future lab work may attempt to quantify, whereas more accurate environmental data is elusive.
4. Results
Here we provide the results of the different measurements made to fill gaps and complement the datasets available in the literature, and thus enable our model simulations. These measurements include sediment carbon and nitrogen content of cryopeg and regional sediments and brine DIC for one borehole sample. Estimates of cell-specific metabolic rate and extracellular enzyme rate are shown for the three different scenarios examined. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of model parameters and the model predictions are presented.
4.1. Sediment carbon and nitrogen measurements
To improve the accuracy of our model, we measured the quantity of organic carbon in sediment permafrost previously sampled at two locations in the BEO. The average value for POC was 0.0232 ± 0.0006 μg C μg sediment−1 at a depth of 367–383 cm (n = 4). The porewater salt concentration was 6‰. The concentration of DOC in this porewater was 51.2 μg C mL−1. The nitrogen content of the sediment was 0.0016 ± 0.00005 μg N μg sediment−1, for a molar C:N ratio of 15.8 mol C mol N−1.
We also measured the concentration of organic carbon in sediment surrounding the CB4 cryopeg brine. For POC, the average value in this sediment layer was 0.0136 ± 0.0012 μg C μg sediment−1 (n = 3). The porewater salt concentration ranged between 22‰ and 30‰. The concentration of DOC in this porewater at 187-cm depth was 1,286 μg C mL−1. The nitrogen content of the sediment was 0.0010 ± 0.00015 μg N μg sediment−1. CB4 sediment thus had a C:N ratio of 15.8 mol C mol N−1.
4.2. Brine dissolved inorganic carbon
The dissolved inorganic carbon content of CBIW brine (in 2017) was measured as 6.93 × 1010 fg C mL−1. The dissolved inorganic carbon content of frozen sediment from CBIW (in 2018) was 4.9 × 1010 fg C mL−1. We do not have DIC measurements for other brines.
4.3. Estimates of cell-specific metabolic rate
The lower and upper bounds of the cell-specific metabolic rate that we estimated for each of the three cryopeg brine scenarios ranged from 0.008 to 0.743 fg C cell−1 day−1 (Table 4). As expected, due to the input of organic carbon, the lowest of these rates was obtained for the CBIW scenario. The calculated minimum growth rate ranged between 2.77 × 10−7 and 4.95 × 10−7 day−1. These extremely low growth rates, which correspond to doubling times on the order of 103 years, are due to the significant age of the system and rely upon our assumption of a starting cell population of 105 cells mL−1.
Table 4
| Parameter (units) | CB1 scenario | CB4 scenario | CBIW scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell-specific metabolic rate (fg C cell−1 day−1) | 0.181–0.743 | 0.099–0.474 | 0.008–0.057 |
| Maximum doubling time (years) | 6,860 | 5,850 | 3,870 |
| Minimum growth rate (day−1) | 2.77 × 10−7 | 3.24 × 10−7 | 4.95 × 10−7 |
Cell-specific metabolic rate bounds and calculated maximum doubling time and minimum growth rate for each cryopeg brine scenario.
4.4. Extracellular enzyme activity rate estimates and predicted timespan
We calculated the EEA rate required to hydrolyze the difference between surrounding sediment POC and brine POC. In the case of the CB1 scenario, the bounds of estimated EEA rates were 0.195 and 0.802 fg C cell−1 day−1. At the measured EEA rate of 0.012 fg C cell−1 day−1, the time required to hydrolyze the POC difference in this scenario would have been 81,200 years. In the CB4 scenario, the estimated bounds of EEA rates were 0.101 and 0.483 fg C cell−1 day−1, with a predicted timespan of 71,000 years. Finally, in the CBIW scenario (that received organic input), the estimated bounds of EEA rates were 0.806 and 0.584, with a predicted timespan of 48,700 years, much closer to the observed age of the cryopeg system. In all cases, this independent estimation of the system’s timespan is near to or less than double the measured timespan, well within the goal of obtaining order of magnitude estimates.
4.5. Model sensitivity analysis
A sensitivity analysis of model parameters revealed the importance of the three parameters at the heart of the Monod growth term (Figure 4): growth rate, cell-specific metabolic rate, and half-velocity constant. These are the only parameters with notable first-order indices. They have a measurable direct impact on model output, whereas cell carbon content and initial cell density do not. The total-effect indices offer more nuance. These indices reflect the added importance of carrying capacity. As a whole, this sensitivity analysis offers insight into which parameters account for much of the variability in the model results.
Figure 4

Sensitivity analysis of microbial parameters used in the organic carbon model. Numerical values represent the first-order (in orange) and total-effect (in blue) Sobol indices of the selected parameters: maximum growth rate (), cell-specific metabolic rate (), cell carbon content (), carrying capacity (), cell specific extracellular enzyme activity (), half-velocity constant for carbon uptake (), and starting cell density (). First-order indices show the sensitivity of the model when varying only the parameter in question. Total-effect indices show the sensitivity of the model when varying the selected parameter in conjunction with the other parameters selected in this analysis. Values shown are rounded at 10−2.
4.6. Model predictions
In two of the eight sets of conditions used for model simulations, our model fully or partially succeeds in explaining the cell densities observed at 40,000 years. With conditions of minimum growth rate paired with low cell-specific metabolic rate and calculated EEA, all three cryopeg brine scenarios reach their observed cell densities (Figure 5A). With measured EEA (Figure 5B), the observed cell density is reached only for the CBIW scenario; CB1 and CB4 scenarios fall short of their densities (Figure 5B). The CBIW scenario succeeds in reaching the observed cell density because it includes an addition of DOC, while the other two depend upon the hydrolysis of existing POC to generate DOC for bacterial growth. Insufficient POC is hydrolyzed toward the end of the trajectory (Supplementary Figure S1) to support these other two communities.
Figure 5

Model predictions of cell density over the lifetime of the system for each cryopeg brine scenario. Measured cell densities at 40,000 years are recreated by the model only under conditions shown in panel A: lower bound net growth rate (), lower bound cell-specific metabolic rate (, and the calculated cell-specific extracellular enzyme activity (); and for CBIW in panel B: lower bound net growth rate (), lower bound cell-specific metabolic rate (, and the measured cell-specific extracellular enzyme activity (). Panels C through H depict cases where the predicted end cell density did not match the observed cell density, regardless of the combination of bounds applied.
By Equation 1, minimum growth rate paired with the upper bound cell-specific metabolic rate should yield the observed cell densities. However, this is not the case. Common to all the minimum growth rate simulations (Figures 5A–D) is a long plateau for the first few thousand years. In those simulations where minimum growth rate and upper bound cell-specific metabolic rate are paired, the populations subsequently grow weakly before declining (Figures 5C,D). Given that abundant POC remains in the system in all cases (Supplementary Figure S1), these results are explained by an EEA rate inferior to the cell-specific metabolic rate requirements. The CBIW population does start to recover due to addition of DOC at 29,000 years, but the growth rate is too low to allow recovery to the observed cell densities before the simulation ends (Figures 5C,D).
When the maximum growth rate is used, the microbial populations rapidly reach the system carrying capacity (Figures 5E–H). Once they consume all available DOC, the populations decline. The time elapsed before the decline is governed by the demand for DOC driven by the cell-specific metabolic rate. Because CBIW sees a punctual addition of DOC at 29,000 years, the high growth rate allows the population to recover for a short time before declining again (Figure 5 panels E-H). However, not enough carbon has been added to sustain the population to the end of this simulation.
5. Discussion
Our overall approach can be considered a bulk energetic analysis. We have made the fundamental assumption that the total energy use of the system corresponds to the difference in organic carbon between the permafrost and the cryopeg brine, assuming these started with equal amounts. This approach mitigates the lack of a secondary metabolic state (i.e., dormancy) in our model. In this way, our cell-specific metabolic rate calculations provide bounds on the average energy requirement of a bacterium in this setting.
Multiple analyses increase our confidence in the mentioned assumption and our model predictions. Using the measured rate of EEA and following our assumption on total energy use in this system, we calculated an expected timespan of the system equal or less than double the measured timespan. We also used the measured C:N ratio of CB4 sediment and the previously measured quantity of ammonia in the brine from
To understand the biological plausibility of our metabolic rate estimates we sought to compare them to existing measurements and estimates of metabolic rates in other remote and energy-limited environments. Assuming an energetic yield of 30 kJ mol C−1 our cell-specific metabolic rate values range on the order of 10−17 to 10−19 W cell−1. This range overlaps at the high end of the range for estimated energy turnover from cold anoxic subsurface marine sediments, the closest analog we can find, on the order of 10−19 W cell−1 and 10−20 W cell−1 (
Thus, the cell-specific metabolic rate values we obtained, being framed by other existing rates, are biologically plausible. Our calculation of the cell-specific metabolic rate implicitly includes every cellular process but growth, including membrane, protein and other adaptations to low temperature and high salinity. The relatively high cell-specific metabolic rate of bacteria in the cryopeg brine system, compared to deep subsurface marine sediments, can be accounted for at least partly by the production of extracellular compounds. Moreover, cell carbon mass in these environments may be larger than cells in deep sediments, which could also account for some of the difference in cell-specific metabolic rate between cryopeg brines and cold (unfrozen) marine sediments.
Extracellular enzyme activity has been documented in cryopeg brines (
We calculated the minimum growth rate of bacteria in this system, making an important assumption on the starting cell concentration of these brines. While we have made an informed assumption in using cell density in sea ice, the value remains at best an educated guess. We have no data on the actual starting cell concentration of these cryopeg brines. Nevertheless, our sensitivity analysis suggests little influence of this parameter on model output. Assuming a starting cell concentration of 105 cells mL−1, we obtain maximum doubling times on the order of 103 years. This result is microbiologically feasible, based on similarly long doubling times (20–2,500 years) calculated for other, related energy-limited environments, particularly marine and deep subsurface sediments (
The sensitivity analysis reflects the importance of the parameters we chose to manipulate in our simulations. Growth rate, cell-specific metabolic rate, and Monod half-velocity constant each have high first-order and total-effect Sobol indices. These high indices reflect an important interplay between the parameters in determining the outcome of the model. The EEA rate also presents a high total-effect index in its role of determining the quantity of DOC in the system. Surprisingly, EEA rate does not exhibit a high first-order index, despite other data suggesting this variable is key to cryopeg brine energetics. In fact, EEA does have a high Sobol index when only considering the end concentration of POC in the system (not shown).
In all but two (of 8) sets of conditions for simulations, the model fails to reconstruct a cell growth trajectory that yields the observed cell densities. In these cases, cell density collapses to zero due to the lack of available DOC to meet community energetic requirements. However, in most cases, plenty of POC, a potential source of energy, remains (Supplementary Figure S1). The extinction of available DOC in these simulations (Supplementary Figure S1) is caused by the cell-specific metabolic rate being higher than the cell-specific EEA rate. In other words, individual cells are consuming DOC faster than their enzymes can convert POC to DOC.
While the half-velocity constant presents high Sobol indices, this result must be nuanced. First, the chosen value is orders of magnitude lower that the quantity of DOC present in the system. Thus, the impact of this term at the beginning of the simulation is low, and growth proceeds unimpeded. A higher value might slow growth, but the timespan here is long enough that the effect would be negligible. When the quantity of DOC in the system is closer to or below the value chosen, the community is typically on a trajectory toward extinction in the model. Hence, the half-velocity constant, while important because it modulates growth, does not alone explain why the model is limited in explaining our observations.
Simulations based on the CBIW scenario provide some insight on model success versus failure in predicting the observations. In this scenario, the lower bound cell-specific metabolic rate is lower than the extracellular enzyme activity rate used, whether the calculated or measured value (Table 4, Section 4.3). Thus, with abundant DOC available, the model can reproduce the observed cell density using the minimum growth rate (Figures 5A,B). Observed cell densities are also obtained for the CB1 and CB4 scenarios if the calculated EEA rate is used (Figure 5A). In contrast, using the maximum growth rate in conjunction with the calculated EEA rate leads to the depletion of the POC pool, unless carrying capacity is reduced by one order of magnitude (not shown).
Clearly, the EEA rate has the potential to make bioavailable a significant energy source in the system: POC. We note that the observed cell-specific rate of EEA used in the simulations is the average of activities measured on only three substrates in CBIW brine. This rate is kept constant throughout every simulation. This simplification does not accurately reflect the number and specificity of enzymes produced in a cryopeg brine, their complex kinetics, the regulation of their production, or their lifetimes under subzero brine conditions. The cell-specific EEA rate surely fluctuated over the lifespan of the brine as a function of cell density, DOC concentration, and extracellular enzyme turnover time. We were thus led to calculate the range of EEA rates that would allow for enough POC to be hydrolyzed to sustain the microbial community. For the CB1 and CB4 scenarios, these calculated rates are an order of magnitude higher than the measured rate used. Conversely, we calculated the amount of time needed for the chosen EEA rate to hydrolyze the required amount of POC. The results point to a longer lifespan for the cryopeg brines than the measured 40,000 years (by carbon dating), as high as 81,200 years in one case. This discrepancy, based on the chosen EEA rates being too low, provides one explanation as to why our model fails in many cases to explain the observed cell densities. A lack of data to account for cell size differences between in vitro and in situ measurements may represent another. Future research on extracellular enzyme production and kinetics at subzero temperatures and high salinities, coupled with cell-size measurements, could allow for an improved understanding of bacterial energetics in cryopeg brines.
Despite being detected (
6. Conclusion
Here we have produced a first estimation of cell-specific metabolic rate in cryopeg brines, ancient, geologically isolated, subzero hypersaline liquids in Arctic permafrost. Comparing our estimates to the few other estimates available on natural microbial systems is difficult, given the use of different approaches and reporting units. Our estimates suggest that cell-specific metabolic rate in a cryopeg system is much higher than in subsurface marine sediments (
To further understand the energetics of the cryopeg system, we developed a model of a simplified organic carbon cycle in subzero cryopeg brines. The results of a selective sensitivity analysis of this model suggest that growth rate, cell-specific metabolic rate and EEA rate are key parameters in determining the fate of the microbial community. Running simulations representative of different energetic bounds for each cryopeg brine improved our understanding of the history of a cryopeg microbial community. In most cases, the energetic requirement is too high and the microbial community collapses. A higher EEA rate would allow the community to take advantage of the energy locked within the high amounts of POC in the system. Where we modeled a punctual addition of DOC into the system, the population was either too slow growing to achieve the observed cell density, or the quantity of DOC was insufficient to sustain it. In cases where the lower bound cell-specific metabolic rate was inferior to the EEA rate, the model was successful in reproducing the observed cell densities after 40,000 years. In calculating the required EEA rate to satisfy the energetic requirements in each of the cryopeg brine scenarios considered, we concluded that the 40,000-year timespan could be reconciled with the measured EEA rate if the energetic requirements of the bacterial community are low enough. The calculated EEA based on our assumption on starting DOC and POC conditions yields an expected system timespan within a factor of two of the measured timespans. This result increases our confidence in the assumptions underlying our energetic analyses.
Although our model unavoidably relies on numerous assumptions, it has produced testable hypotheses for the continued study of cryopeg brines. It also leads us to conclude that the microbial densities observed today in cryopeg brines could well have been reached in energetic isolation over an estimated system lifespan of 40,000 years. In general, the success of these communities would have required a lower growth rate than that observed under in-situ conditions in the lab and higher average rate of EEA. The calculated cell-specific metabolic rate of bacteria in these systems can be met by the assumed available quantity of POC and DOC in the system and appears to be biologically plausible, particularly for bacteria functioning under the extreme conditions of subzero temperature and hypersalinity. Finally, this model could be tuned in its parameters to describe theoretical astrobiologically relevant environments within the icy crusts of Europa or Enceladus.
Funding
This work was initially supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (grant number GBMF5488). GK also received support from a private sponsorship and the Karl M. Banse professorship to JD.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. The code to reproduce the analyses in this study can be found in the GitHub repository of this project at https://github.com/Ge0rges/Cryopeg-Carbon-Model.
Author contributions
GK developed the carbon model, estimated the cell-specific metabolic rate values, performed all calculations, model runs, and lab work, and drafted the manuscript. TH provided the methodological ideas required to estimate cell-specific metabolic rate, crucial feedback on the model, including the suggestion to conduct a sensitivity analysis, and critical revisions to the manuscript. GI provided organic and inorganic carbon data, expansion factors for ice, interpretation of dating measurements, and edits to the manuscript. JD supervised all work, advised GK, administered the grant, provided lab facilities, and revised and edited the manuscript. All authors approved this submission.
Acknowledgments
We thank the many people who provided helpful discussions, data, and encouragement to develop the model and associated calculations: Shelly Carpenter for help in the lab and with the sediment carbon measurements; Hajo Eicken for providing important input that stimulated this effort; Zac Cooper and Josephine Rapp for helpful discussions about brine genomics; Max Showalter for the critical EEA data and helpful modeling discussions; and Jodi Young and Kaitlin Harrison for discussion regarding the potential for chemoautotrophy in cryopeg brines. GK would also like to thank the organizers of the Microenergy Conference 2022 for the opportunity to present and discuss an early version of this work, Scott Martin for helpful mathematical discussion, and Mario Nohra for reviewing and auditing the project’s codebase.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1206641/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AhnS.JungJ.JangI.-A.MadsenE. L.ParkW. (2017). Role of glyoxylate shunt in oxidative stress response. J. Biol. Chem.291, 11928–11938. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m115.708149
2
ArnostiC.JørgensenB. B. (2006). Organic carbon degradation in arctic marine sediments, Svalbard: a comparison of initial and terminal steps. Geomicrobiol J.23, 551–563. doi: 10.1080/01490450600897336
3
BakermansC.Ayala-del-RíoH. L.PonderM. A.VishnivetskayaT.GilichinskyD.ThomashowM. F.et al. (2006). Psychrobacter cryohalolentis sp. nov. and Psychrobacter arcticus sp. nov., isolated from Siberian permafrost. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr.56, 1285–1291. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64043-0
4
BakermansC.NealsonK. H. (2004). Relationship of critical temperature to macromolecular synthesis and growth yield in Psychrobacter cryopegella. J. Bacteriol.186, 2340–2345. doi: 10.1128/jb.186.8.2340-2345.2004
5
BakermansC.TsapinA. I.Souza-EgipsyV.GilichinskyD. A.NealsonK. H. (2003). Reproduction and metabolism at −10°C of bacteria isolated from Siberian permafrost. Environ. Microbiol.5, 321–326. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00419.x
6
BezansonJ.EdelmanA.KarpinskiS.ShahV. B. (2017). Julia: a fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev.59, 65–98. doi: 10.1137/141000671
7
CarilloS.CasilloA.PierettiG.ParrilliE.SanninoF.Bayer-GiraldiM.et al. (2015). A unique capsular polysaccharide structure from the psychrophilic marine bacterium Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H that mimics antifreeze (glyco)proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 179–189. doi: 10.1021/ja5075954
8
CoffinR. B.SmithJ. P.YozaB.BoydT. J.MontgomeryM. T. (2017). Spatial variation in sediment organic carbon distribution across the Alaskan Beaufort Sea shelf. Energies10:1265. doi: 10.3390/en10091265
9
Colangelo-LillisJ.EickenH.CarpenterS. D.DemingJ. W. (2016). Evidence for marine origin and microbial-viral habitability of sub-zero hypersaline aqueous inclusions within permafrost near Barrow, Alaska. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.92:fiw053. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw053
10
CooperZ. S. (2021). Microbial evolution and ecology in subzero hypersaline environments. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
11
CooperZ. S.RappJ. Z.CarpenterS. D.IwahanaG.EickenH.DemingJ. W. (2019). Distinctive microbial communities in subzero hypersaline brines from Arctic coastal sea ice and rarely sampled cryopegs. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.95:fiz166. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz166
12
CooperZ. S.RappJ. Z.ShoemakerA. M. D.AndersonR. E.ZhongZ.-P.DemingJ. W. (2022). Evolutionary divergence of Marinobacter strains in cryopeg brines as revealed by pangenomics. Front. Microbiol.13:879116. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.879116
13
CoxG. F. N.WeeksW. F. (1975). Brine drainage and initial salt entrapment in sodium chloride ice. Hanover, NH: US Army Corps Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.
14
CzajkaJ. J.AbernathyM. H.BenitesV. T.BaidooE. E. K.DemingJ. W.TangY. J. (2018). Model metabolic strategy for heterotrophic bacteria in the cold ocean based on Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115, 12507–12512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807804115
15
DemingJ. W.YoungJ. N. (2017). “The role of exopolysaccharides in microbial adaptation to cold habitats” in Psychrophiles: From biodiversity to biotechnology. ed. MargesinR. (Cham: Springer).
16
GilichinskyD.RivkinaE.BakermansC.ShcherbakovaV.PetrovskayaL.OzerskayaS.et al. (2005). Biodiversity of cryopegs in permafrost. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.53, 117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.02.003
17
GilichinskyD.RivkinaE.ShcherbakovaV.LaurinavichuisK.TiedjeJ. (2003). Supercooled water brines within permafrost: an unknown ecological niche for microorganisms: a model for astrobiology. Astrobiology3, 331–341. doi: 10.1089/153110703769016424
18
Gomez-BuckleyA. C.ShowalterG. M.WongM. L. (2022). Modeling virus and bacteria populations in Europa’s subsurface ocean. Life12:620. doi: 10.3390/life12050620
19
GoñiM. A.JuranekL. W.SiplerR. E.WelchK. A. (2021). Particulate organic matter distributions in the water column of the Chukchi Sea during late summer. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans126:664. doi: 10.1029/2021jc017664
20
HoehlerT. M.JørgensenB. B. (2013). Microbial life under extreme energy limitation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.11, 83–94. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2939
21
HunterJ. D. (2007). Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng.9, 90–95. doi: 10.1109/mcse.2007.55
22
IwahanaG.CooperZ. S.CarpenterS. D.DemingJ. W.EickenH. (2021). Intra-ice and intra-sediment cryopeg brine occurrence in permafrost near Utqiaġvik (Barrow). Permafrost Periglac.32, 427–446. doi: 10.1002/ppp.2101
23
JørgensenB. B.BoetiusA. (2007). Feast and famine — microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.5, 770–781. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1745
24
JørgensenB. B.MarshallI. P. (2016). Slow microbial life in the seabed. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.8, 311–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015535
25
KirchmanD. L.HillV.CottrellM. T.GradingerR.MalmstromR. R.ParkerA. (2009). Standing stocks, production, and respiration of phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria in the western Arctic Ocean. Deep Sea Res Part I Top Stud Oceanogr56, 1237–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.10.018
26
KrembsC.EickenH.DemingJ. W. (2011). Exopolymer alteration of physical properties of sea ice and implications for ice habitability and biogeochemistry in a warmer Arctic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.108, 3653–3658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100701108
27
KrembsC.EickenH.JungeK.DemingJ. W. (2002). High concentrations of exopolymeric substances in Arctic winter sea ice: implications for the polar ocean carbon cycle and cryoprotection of diatoms. Deep Sea Res. Part Oceanogr Res. Pap.49, 2163–2181. doi: 10.1016/s0967-0637(02)00122-x
28
LeverM. A.RogersK. L.LloydK. G.OvermannJ.SchinkB.ThauerR. K.et al. (2015). Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory-and field-based investigations. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.39, 688–728. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv020
29
MaY.DixitV.InnesM. J.GuoX.RackauckasC. (2021). “A comparison of automatic differentiation and continuous sensitivity analysis for derivatives of differential equation solutions,” in 2021 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC), Waltham, MA, USA. 1–9.
30
MarionG. M.FarrenR. E.KomrowskiA. J. (1999). Alternative pathways for seawater freezing. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol.29, 259–266. doi: 10.1016/s0165-232x(99)00033-6
31
MarionG. M.FritsenC. H.EickenH.PayneM. C. (2003). The search for life on Europa: limiting environmental factors, potential habitats, and earth analogues. Astrobiology3, 785–811. doi: 10.1089/153110703322736105
32
MarxJ. G.CarpenterS. D.DemingJ. W. (2009). Production of cryoprotectant extracellular polysaccharide substances (EPS) by the marine psychrophilic bacterium Colwellia psychrerythraea strain 34H under extreme conditions. Can. J. Microbiol.55, 63–72. doi: 10.1139/w08-130
33
MathisJ. T.HansellD. A.BatesN. R. (2005). Strong hydrographic controls on spatial and seasonal variability of dissolved organic carbon in the Chukchi Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part Ii Top Stud. Oceanogr.52, 3245–3258. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2005.10.002
34
MeurerA.SmithC. P.PaprockiM.ČertíkO.KirpichevS. B.RocklinM.et al. (2017). SymPy: symbolic computing in Python. Peerj Comput. Sci.3:e103. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.103
35
MeyerH.SchirrmeisterL.AndreevA.WagnerD.HubbertenH.-W.YoshikawaK.et al. (2010). Lateglacial and Holocene isotopic and environmental history of northern coastal Alaska – results from a buried ice-wedge system at Barrow. Quat. Sci. Rev.29, 3720–3735. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.08.005
36
MonodJ. (1949). The growth of bacterial cultures. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.3, 371–394. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103
37
NguyenD.MarangerR. (2011). Respiration and bacterial carbon dynamics in Arctic Sea ice. Polar Biol.34, 1843–1855. doi: 10.1007/s00300-011-1040-z
38
OsmanM. B.TierneyJ. E.ZhuJ.TardifR.HakimG. J.KingJ.et al. (2021). Globally resolved surface temperatures since the last glacial maximum. Nature599, 239–244. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03984-4
39
PirtS. J. (1982). Maintenance energy: a general model for energy-limited and energy-sufficient growth. Arch. Microbiol.133, 300–302. doi: 10.1007/bf00521294
40
PriceP. B.SowersT. (2004). Temperature dependence of metabolic rates for microbial growth, maintenance, and survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.101, 4631–4636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400522101
41
PriscuJ. C.HandK. P. (2012). Microbial habitability of icy worlds: as our exploration of space begins its sixth decade, we have new tools and techniques to probe questions of planetary habitability. Microbe Mag.7, 167–172. doi: 10.1128/microbe.7.167.1
42
RackauckasC.NieQ. (2016). Differential equations. Jl – a performant and feature-rich ecosystem for solving differential equations in Julia. J. Open Res. Softw.5:15. doi: 10.5334/jors.151
43
RappJ. Z.SullivanM. B.DemingJ. W. (2021). Divergent genomic adaptations in the microbiomes of Arctic subzero sea-ice and cryopeg brines. Front. Microbiol.12:701186. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.701186
44
RosselP. E.BienholdC.HehemannL.DittmarT.BoetiusA. (2020). Molecular composition of dissolved organic matter in sediment porewater of the arctic deep-sea observatory HAUSGARTEN (Fram Strait). Front. Mar. Sci.7:428. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00428
45
RoweG. T.DemingJ. W. (1985). The role of bacteria in the turnover of organic carbon in deep-sea sediments. J. Mar. Res.43, 925–950. doi: 10.1357/002224085788453877
46
SchmidtJ. L.DemingJ. W.JumarsP. A.KeilR. G. (1998). Constancy of bacterial abundance in surficial marine sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr.43, 976–982. doi: 10.4319/lo.1998.43.5.0976
47
ShampineL. F.ReicheltM. W. (1997). The MATLAB ODE suite. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.18, 1–22. doi: 10.1137/s1064827594276424
48
SholesS. F.Krissansen-TottonJ.CatlingD. C. (2019). A maximum subsurface biomass on Mars from untapped free energy: CO and H2 as potential antibiosignatures. Astrobiology19, 655–668. doi: 10.1089/ast.2018.1835
49
ShowalterG. M. (2020). Acquisition, degradation, and cycling of organic matter within sea-ice brines by bacteria and their viruses. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
50
SobolI. M. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math. Comput. Simulat.55, 271–280. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6
51
SobolI. M.TarantolaS.GatelliD.KucherenkoS. S.MauntzW. (2007). Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe.92, 957–960. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.07.001
52
TeskeA. P. (2005). The deep subsurface biosphere is alive and well. Trends Microbiol.13, 402–404. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.07.004
53
TijhuisL.LoosdrechtM. C. M. V.HeijnenJ. J. (1993). A thermodynamically based correlation for maintenance Gibbs energy requirements in aerobic and anaerobic chemotrophic growth. Biotechnol. Bioeng.42, 509–519. doi: 10.1002/bit.260420415
54
Trembath-ReichertE.Shah WalterS. R.OrtizM. A. F.CarterP. D.GirguisP. R.HuberJ. A. (2021). Multiple carbon incorporation strategies support microbial survival in cold subseafloor crustal fluids. Sci. Adv.7:eabg0153. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg0153
55
van EverdingenR.. (2005). Multi-language glossary of permafrost and related ground-ice terms. Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data Center/World Data Center for Glaciology.
56
VerardoD. J.FroelichP. N.McIntyreA. (1990). Determination of organic carbon and nitrogen in marine sediments using the Carlo Erba NA-1500 analyzer. Deep Sea Res. Part Oceanogr. Res. Pap.37, 157–165. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(90)90034-s
57
VetterY. A.DemingJ. W.JumarsP. A.Krieger-BrockettB. B. (1998). A predictive model of bacterial foraging by means of freely released extracellular enzymes. Microbial. Ecol.36, 75–92. doi: 10.1007/s002489900095
58
WaskomM. (2021). Seaborn: statistical data visualization. J. Open Source Softw.6:3021. doi: 10.21105/joss.03021
59
YagerP. L.DemingJ. W. (1999). Pelagic microbial activity in an arctic polynya: testing for temperature and substrate interactions using a kinetic approach. Limnol. Oceanogr.44, 1882–1893. doi: 10.4319/lo.1999.44.8.1882
60
ZhongZ.-P.RappJ. Z.WainainaJ. M.SolonenkoN. E.MaughanH.CarpenterS. D.et al. (2020). Viral ecogenomics of Arctic cryopeg brine and sea ice. Msystems5, e00246–e00220. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00246-20
Summary
Keywords
cryopeg, Arctic, extremophiles, permafrost, maintenance energy
Citation
Kanaan G, Hoehler TM, Iwahana G and Deming JW (2023) Modeled energetics of bacterial communities in ancient subzero brines. Front. Microbiol. 14:1206641. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1206641
Received
16 April 2023
Accepted
06 July 2023
Published
26 July 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
William J. Brazelton, The University of Utah, United States
Reviewed by
Marco J. L. Coolen, Curtin University, Australia; Elizabeth Trembath-Reichert, Arizona State University, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Kanaan, Hoehler, Iwahana and Deming.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Georges Kanaan, gkanaan@uw.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.