Composition of the alfalfa pathobiome in commercial fields

Abstract

Through the recent advances of modern high-throughput sequencing technologies, the “one microbe, one disease” dogma is being gradually replaced with the principle of the “pathobiome”. Pathobiome is a comprehensive biotic environment that not only includes a diverse community of all disease-causing organisms within the plant but also defines their mutual interactions and resultant effect on plant health. To date, the concept of pathobiome as a major component in plant health and sustainable production of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), the most extensively cultivated forage legume in the world, is non-existent. Here, we approached this subject by characterizing the biodiversity of the alfalfa pathobiome using high-throughput sequencing technology. Our metagenomic study revealed a remarkable abundance of different pathogenic communities associated with alfalfa in the natural ecosystem. Profiling the alfalfa pathobiome is a starting point to assess known and identify new and emerging stress challenges in the context of plant disease management. In addition, it allows us to address the complexity of microbial interactions within the plant host and their impact on the development and evolution of pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

The productivity of alfalfa, the most extensively cultivated forage legume in the world and the third most widely grown crop in the United States, has often been affected and limited by different diseases, insect pests, and abiotic stress factors (Monteros and Bouton, 2009). Over 70 diseases caused by more than 130 species of different infectious agents, including fungi, Ooymycetes, bacteria, viruses, phytoplasmas, nematodes, and parasitic plants, are described in the latest edition of the Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases and Pests (Samac et al., 2015). In the United States alone, diseases and nematodes of alfalfa cause at least US$400 million and arthropods US$260 million in economic losses annually (Summers, 1998).

Through the recent advances of modern high-throughput sequencing technologies, the “one microbe, one disease” dogma is shifting toward the principle of the “pathobiome”, a diverse community of pathogenic microbes within the biotic environment of the plant host (Vayssier-Taussat et al., 2014; Bass et al., 2019; Mannaa and Seo, 2021). While numerous individual pathogens and diseases they cause in alfalfa have been described, to date, the conception of the alfalfa pathobiome as a major component in plant health and sustainable production is non-existent, and its detailed characterization has not been carried out. Meanwhile, the importance of an organism's pathobiome and understanding of pathogenicity as a final product of complex interactions involving the host, diverse pathogenic communities, and all organismal microbiota is rapidly emerging both in plant and animal health (Bass et al., 2019; Trivedi et al., 2020). One of the primary research aims and a starting point leading in this direction is to describe the structural biodiversity of the relevant pathobiomes and to identify potential threats or novel, unsuspected species (Vayssier-Taussat et al., 2014). This will provide an understanding of how the pathobiome promotes disease, creates an environment for synergisms between microbial pathogens, and contributes to the origination and distribution of novel pathogens.

During the process of identifying novel and emerging viruses infecting alfalfa via high-throughput sequencing (HTS) approaches, we noticed that individual field samples were coinfected with dozens of different pathogens, including bacteria and fungi (Bejerman et al., 2020; Nemchinov et al., 2022). We proposed that this sophisticated multi-pathogenic habitat can affect the behavior of all co-infecting organisms, their accumulation in the host, and, possibly, their transmission rates. In this study, we continued to explore the complexity of alfalfa's microbial environment with an emphasis on the composition of the crop's pathobiome, focusing on bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. We also attempted to estimate the host reaction to a consortium of pathogenic microorganisms by profiling gene expression patterns shaped by the plant pathobiome in the field environment.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant materials

Alfalfa samples were collected from 10 commercial fields in Grant County, WA. Specific collection site details were intentionally omitted to protect producers' privacy. Field sampling was done in a zigzag or “W” pattern to include representative samples across the entire field. Two or three plants (the upper 10–15 cm of stems with leaves) were collected from each of the 50 sublocations (five sublocations per field). The symptomatic plants from each sublocation displayed various symptoms shown in Figure 1, including chlorosis, leaf distortions, and leaf spots. These symptoms are often associated with viral and fungal plant pathogens. Since all the commercial fields are in the same geographic area, the symptomatology of the plants across all fields was rather common. The sampling was done on a single day, 6 October 2021, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. The age of the fields varied from one to several years of establishment of this perennial crop and would have been late in the harvest season following approximately four cutting/swathing events.

Figure 1

2.2. Nucleic acid extraction

Total RNA was extracted from five leaves pooled from the plants in each of the 50 sublocations using the Promega Maxwell^® RSC Plant RNA Kit (Promega Corp., Fitchburg, WI, United States) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total DNA was extracted using the Wizard^® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega Corp., Fitchburg, WI, United States).

2.3. High-throughput sequencing

Library preparation was performed with Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA with Ribo-Zero kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States), and the sequencing platform used was HiseqX10 (PE150) (Omega Biosciences, Norcross, GA, United States). The 16S and ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer) library preparation for ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing to 50K, PE300, 25K in each direction, was carried out by Omega Biosciences (Norcross, GA). To discriminate from chloroplast DNA, primers targeted amplification of the DNA encoding V5-V7 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene: 799F, 5′ AACMGGATTAGATACCCKG 3′ and 1193R, 5′ ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC 3′, with Illumina adapters. Primers applied for amplification of the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region were ITS1F (F) 5′ CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA 3′ and ITS2R (R) 5′ GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC 3′.

2.4. Bioinformatics analysis

HTS reads were checked for quality using FastQC 0.11.5 (Andrews, 2010). They were next trimmed of adapters and for quality using Trimmomatic 0.39 (Bolger et al., 2014). The reads were screened against the TruSeq3-PE.fa:2:30:10 adaptors, removing low quality (3) or N bases at the leading and trailing-end of the sequence, scanned with a 4-base sliding window cutting off the quality per base at 15, and reads below 36 were discarded. Trimmed data were assembled by SPAdes (Meleshko et al., 2019) and by QIAGEN CLC Genomics version 21 (QIAGEN, Redwood City, CA, United States). The resulting contigs were screened using BLASTx search against a custom database containing refseq viral protein sequences (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/) and proteomes of Arabidopsis thaliana (Uniprot UP000006548) and Arabidopsis lyrata (Uniprot UP000008694). The cutoffs for BLASTx were a max target of 50 hits with an expect value of 1. Values > 1e-10 were filtered out. BLASTx was performed on the resulting viral hits against the NCBI nr database for verification. Sequences were further manually screened and filtered for false positives to ensure accuracy. Sequencing coverage depth was calculated by mapping the trimmed reads back to the viral contigs using BBMap 39.01 (Bushnell, 2014). The 16S and ITS sequencing data analyses for bacteria and fungi identification were performed by Omega Biosciences (Norcross, GA) using Illumina BaseSpace 16S Metagenomics Labs app (Version 1.0.0) and RefSeq RDP 16S v3 May 2018 DADA2 and UNITE Fungal ITS Database v7.2.

For metagenomic analysis, adapters were removed, and reads were filtered using bbduck (BBMap; Bushnell, 2014). GNU Parallel 20220222 was used to process the data when possible (Tange, 2018; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6213471). Trimmed reads were mapped to alfalfa genome (ZhongmuNo.1; Chen et al., 2020) and mitochondria genome of Medicago truncatula (KT971339.1). Unmapped reads were merged and submitted to MEGAHIT (Li et al., 2015) for assembly or assembled with SPAdes (Meleshko et al., 2019). Sequences were also screened using MEGAN Huson et al. (2016). For gene expression analysis, the gene subsets of Gene Ontology (GO) terms “response to stress” (GO:0006950) and “photosynthesis” (GO:0015979) were identified from the source data (Chen et al., 2020). To measure the transcript expression levels in the field samples and to eliminate biases related to gene length and sequencing depth, RPKM (reads per kilobase of transcript per million reads mapped) normalization method was used for the calculation of photosynthesis and stress-related genes (Dillies et al., 2013).

2.5. Pathogen identification

In addition to the bioinformatics-based analysis of the HTS data, pathogenic species we manually curated using a known list of alfalfa disease-causing organisms (Samac et al., 2015) and based on numerous literature reports from other plant species.

3. Results

3.1. Snapshot of the microbial community

The results of RNA sequencing based on the transcripts' expression showed that the dominant constituents of the alfalfa pathobiome are viruses and fungi, while the occurrence of bacterial pathogens was substantially lower (Figure 2). These findings concur with the reports on relatively few bacterial plant pathogens affecting alfalfa, although their impact on the crop is substantial (Getachew et al., 2015).

Figure 2

3.2. Alfalfa virome

Viral communities were identified based on results of RNA sequencing. Confirmative with our previous results (Nemchinov et al., 2022), we found that each of the alfalfa samples from commercial fields was coinfected with many different viruses, averaging 10 per sample (Figure 3, Supplementary File 1). Nearly ubiquitous were pathogenic alfalfa mosaic virus, and amalga/partitiviruses that are not commonly recognized to cause disease symptoms in their hosts, although their roles are poorly understood. Several other known viral plant pathogens of alfalfa were found, including lucerne transient streak virus (LTSV), pea streak virus (PeSV), alfalfa latent virus, a strain of PeSV (Nemchinov et al., 2015), and bean leafroll virus (BLRV). Recently discovered, persistent and vertically transmitted Snake River alfalfa virus (SRAV) (Dahan et al., 2022; Postnikova et al., 2023) was detected in all 50 samples. Reads of previously reported three rhabdoviruses (Nemchinov et al., 2022), alfalfa cytorhabdoviruses 1 and 2 (ACRV1&2), and alfalfa nucleorhabdovirus 1 (ANRV1), were identified in majority of the tested samples, indicating that they are widespread in alfalfa, or at least in the surveyed area. In addition, sequencing reads of the following potentially novel viruses or viral strains were revealed:

Figure 3

Blackberry chlorotic ringspot virus (BRSV, estimated 100% identity). The known host range of BRSV, an ilarvirus originally isolated from blackberry (Rubus spp.) plants showing diffuse chlorotic spotting and ringspots, does not include M. sativa (Jones et al., 2006; Poudel et al., 2014). Notably, there are many feral blackberry plants near the area where alfalfa samples were collected.

Pear chlorotic leaf spot-associated virus (PCLSaV, estimated 34% identity), a novel emaravirus associated with a severe disease of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) trees in China and not identified in alfalfa prior to this work (Liu et al., 2020).

Chili pepper mild mottle virus (CPMMoV, estimated 100% identity), a tobamovirus recently discovered in pepper (Capsicum spp.) plants displaying mild mottle and mosaic symptoms (Vélez-Olmedo et al., 2021).

Rudbeckia flower distortion virus (RuFDV, Caulimoviridae, estimated 60% identity), a causal agent of severe flower deformation in Rudbeckia hirta (Lockhart et al., 2017).

Apple virus E, (AVE, estimated 65–98% identity), an unclassified tombus-like virus isolated from apple (Malus domestica), (GenBank: MT892660.1).

Unclassified deltaflexivirus (98–100% identity), (GenBank MN627486), and Phaseolus vulgaris endornavirus 1 (PvEV1, estimated 97% identity), originally isolated from the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) (Okada et al., 2013) and not reported in alfalfa.

Teucrium fruticans sobemo-like virus (92% identity), originally identified in Jiangsu Province, China (Yang B. et al., 2022; Yang S. et al., 2022).

Some of these viruses, previously unreported in alfalfa, occurred sporadically, in one or two samples (BRSV, PCLSaV, CPMMoV, and RuFDV), while others were identified more frequently (AVE and deltaflexivirus). In total, 24 viruses were identified in all tested samples.

3.3. Bacterial communities

Bacterial communities were identified based on the results from the 16S amplicons. Plant pathogenic bacteria belonging to the following genera were found in the analyzed alfalfa samples: Burkholderia, Erwinia, Clavibacter, Dickeya, Pantoea, Pectobacterium, Pseudomonas, Ralstonia, Streptomyces, Xanthomonas, and Xylella (Figure 4, Supplementary File 2). Bacterial species of all these genera, except Ralstonia, have been well-documented in alfalfa. It is known, however, that the model legume plant Medicago truncatula, a close relative of alfalfa, is susceptible to R. solanacearum (Vailleau et al., 2007). Importantly, the very few sequencing reads of Ralstonia spp. found in this study, may not necessarily represent an authentic infection (Supplementary Table 2). The same is true for Dickeya and Xylella.

Figure 4

Some bacterial pathogens were found at the species level, including Clavibacter michiganensis, Erwinia billingiae, Erwinia oleae, Erwinia tasmaniensis, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas flavescens, Pseudomonas graminis, and Pseudomonas viridiflava. C. michiganensis is a cause of bacterial wilt in alfalfa, occurring throughout alfalfa-growing regions (Ophel-Keller, 2015). It was found in 31 of 50 tested samples. Pseudomonas viridiflava was reported to cause bacterial stem blight (Lipps et al., 2019) and root rot disease in alfalfa (Heydari et al., 2012). Sequencing reads mapped to this species were found in six samples. The ubiquitous gram-negative Pantoea agglomerans, also known as Erwinia herbicola, is abundant in plant and animal products and can cause sprout rot in alfalfa (Moline and Kulik, 1997). It was present in all tested samples. The remaining species are not known to cause diseases in alfalfa, although they may be pathogenic in other plant hosts (Hildebrand et al., 1994; Vidaurre-Barahona et al., 2021) or recognized for their biocontrol activities.

3.4. Fungal communities

Fungal communities were identified based on the results from the ITS amplicons. Fungal species from 18 genera were identified, including agriculturally important plant pathogens and those not previously reported in alfalfa (Figure 5, Supplementary Table 3). The first group contained several Alternaria spp., among which was A. alternata, recently found to cause blight symptoms in alfalfa in Canada and also identified in the U.S. alfalfa (Abbasi et al., 2018; Nemchinov et al., 2022); Pseudopeziza medicaginis, a causal agent of common leaf spot in alfalfa (Samac et al., 2015); Verticillium alfalfa and closely related fungus V. dahliae, causing Verticillium wilt in alfalfa (Stuteville and Erwin, 1990; Huang, 2015); Stemphylium vesicarium, a causal agent of Stemphylium leaf spot in alfalfa (Smith, 2015); Ascochyta medicaginicola, infecting alfalfa and its close relative M. truncatula (Chen et al., 2015); Leptosphaeria weimeri, the teleomorph of Stagnospora melioti causing Stagnospora leaf spot and root rot disease (Irwin and Armour, 2015); Alternaria arborescens that was recently identified by HTS in the U.S. alfalfa samples from the same growing region (Postnikova et al., 2023).

Figure 5

The second group contained Mycosphaerella tassiana, found in Canabis sativa and rye (Secale cereale L.) and pathogenic in >35 species other than alfalfa (https://species.nbnatlas.org/species/NBNSYS0000016449); Epicoccum nigrum, a widespread fungus, an opportunistic pathogen, and a known biocontrol agent (Bruton et al., 1993; Ogórek et al., 2020); Fusarium denticulatum, which is known to occur only on sweet potatoes (Nirenberg and O'Donnell, 1998) and was not, to the best of our knowledge, reported in alfalfa; Botrytis caroliniana that was recently isolated from blackberry fruits symptomatic for gray mold (Li et al., 2012); A. rosae, A. infectoria, and A. terricola environmental fungi that could also be pathogenic in certain hosts (Woudenberg et al., 2013; Moslemi et al., 2017) but were not, to the best of our knowledge, reported in alfalfa prior to this study; Pseudopithomyces chartarum, pathogenic in wheat (Tóth et al., 2007); Microidium phyllanthi, a cause of Phyllanthus powdery mildew on Phyllanthus reticulatus black-honey shrub and other Phyllanthus species (Pan et al., 2020), that was not, to the best of our knowledge, described in alfalfa.

Notably, similarly to viruses and bacteria identified by HTS, sequencing reads mapped to some fungal species were relatively abundant in all analyzed samples (M. phyllanthi, A. alternata, Stemphylium spp., and M. tassiana), while others were sparse (F. denticulatum, B. caroliniana, and L. weimeri) and thus may not represent authentic infections.

3.5. Pathobiome of the selected samples

On average, each of the alfalfa samples contained 20–30 different pathogens, emphasizing the importance of the complex microbial interactions in affecting plant health. To demonstrate the diversity of microorganisms constituting the pathobiome in individual alfalfa plants, we have chosen three representative samples based on their large and heterogeneous pathogenic communities (Table 1). Some of these alfalfa plant samples displayed diverse, occasionally acute symptomatology (Figure 6). The number of different pathogens in these samples were 37 (A1-1), 25 (A2-1), and 28 (B1-6). According to the RNA-seq estimate, the prevalent pathogens in the samples A1-1 and B6-1 were viruses, mostly AMV and PeSV, while in the sample A2-1, those were viruses (mostly PeSV) and fungi (primarily Microidium phyllanthi) (Figure 2, Supplementary Files 1–3).

Figure 6

3.6. Field pathobiome and host genomics

Comparatively to the field pathogenomics strategy that was introduced to provide insight into the population structure of emerging plant pathogens in the field (Hubbard et al., 2015), we used a similar approach except for a survey of host GE patterns shaped by the plant pathobiome in the field environment. Since all plants in commercial alfalfa fields are to some degree impacted by various organisms, it is not possible to obtain de facto uninfected control samples for differential GE analysis. For that reason, we assessed the expression of the selected groups of genes quantitatively by mapping sequencing reads to the genome of M. sativa (Chen et al., 2020). The selected categories were stress-and photosynthesis-related genes, annotated by their respective Gene Ontology (GO) IDs (Chen et al., 2020). The expression of both groups of genes was notably fluctuating between different samples, although no definite correlation was established with the presence of specific pathogens (Figures 7, 8).

Figure 7

Figure 8

Among stress-related genes, dehydrins (MsG0380018013.01, MsG0780041307.01, MsG0680035598.01, and MsG0680035588.01) were the most prominently expressed in all samples (Figure 7), particularly in fields 8 and 10, reaching over 50,000 reads in sample 8-2. While the response of plant dehydrins of the LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) protein family to abiotic stress is largely documented (Liu et al., 2017), their pleotropic effect, including on biotic stress tolerance, has also been reported (Brini et al., 2011). Besides dehydrins, expression levels of genes encoding heat shock proteins (MsG0580030003.01), critical for plant defense responses (Lee et al., 2012), varied substantially. The variability in expression of other genes regulating resistance mechanisms to biotic and abiotic stresses was notable as well (calmodulin, MsG0480023900.01, and universal stress protein, MsG0680030415.01).

Among the photosynthesis-related genes (Figure 8), transcripts mapped to the genes encoding photosystem II (PSII) D2 protein (MsG0380014032.01), which forms the reaction core of PSII; reaction center protein H (MsG0380013999.0), required for stability and assembly of the core complex of PSII; PSII reaction center PsbK protein (MsG0380013927.01), a component of PSII; and photosystem I (PSI) PsaA/PsaB proteins (MsG0380013957.01), central to the electron transfer from plastocyanin to ferredoxin (Paysan-Lafosse et al., 2023), were among the most abundant and variable. The sensitivity of photosynthetic processes to pathogen infection is well-known (Yang and Luo, 2021).

4. Discussion

In this study, we have attempted to characterize by HTS technologies a community of pathogenic organisms, or a pathobiome, of alfalfa, a widely cultivated legume forage crop in many countries around the world. The primary focus of this initial research was on viral, bacterial, and fungal infections. We have also evaluated the variability of gene expression in alfalfa field samples to predict the potential impact of the pathobiome on host fitness and its role as a selective agent in plant evolution. There are several important conclusions that can be drawn from the results of this study:

In field conditions, alfalfa plants are coinfected with a diverse mix of known disease-causing organisms as well as novel, potentially pathogenic agents. It is therefore objectionable to describe field alfalfa diseases strictly based on the “one pathogen, one disease” dogma. Even though a single pathogen could be implicated in the development of a characteristic disease symptomatology in laboratory conditions, a highly diverse, interacting community of microorganisms inhabiting alfalfa plants in the field unquestionably contributes to the health status of the crop.

Plant viruses signify a ubiquitous community of the alfalfa pathobiome, essentially contributing to its diversity and likely to all aspects of complex interactions between coinfecting pathogens and the host. Many of these viruses are known to cause diseases in alfalfa, while the pathogenicity of others has not been established yet and requires further investigation. Importantly, alfalfa may potentially acquire viruses from non-legume hosts and serve as a reservoir for their dissemination, as could happen in the case of BRSV and other viruses found in this study.

The occurrence of the bacterial pathogens in the examined alfalfa samples was not extensive, although sequencing reads from some of the major pathogenic genera were identified, including C. michiganensis, a cause of bacterial wilt throughout the alfalfa-growing regions and a serious problem for the U.S. alfalfa (Ophel-Keller, 2015). It is known that relatively few bacterial pathogens, as compared to viral and fungal infections, affect alfalfa in field conditions (Getachew et al., 2015).

Fungal infections, along with viruses, were dominant components of the alfalfa pathobiome in the examined alfalfa plants and included known agriculturally important pathogens as well as those not previously reported in alfalfa. Similar to the bacterial and viral agents with undefined pathogenic status in alfalfa, the latter group must be investigated experimentally to establish its pathogenic potential.

An evident variability of gene expression was found in alfalfa plants infected with different groups of microorganisms in the field environment. To the best of our knowledge, this “field host genomics” approach to survey host GE responses to cumulative pathogens in the field through high-throughput transcriptomics is a novel undertaking that can offer genomic insights into resistance to multi-pathogenic infections for acceleration of breeding programs. It is therefore likely that a field pathobiome can be a powerful selective agent in plant evolution, affecting host fitness and agricultural traits (Kover and Schaal, 2002). However, distinct criteria for shaping host genomic responses to the collective pathobiome in the field must be developed, including comparability of the data with uninfected controls and an accurate relationship between different components of the pathobiome and patterns of host gene expression.

References

• 1

  AbbasiP. A.AliS.RenderosW.NaeemH. A.PapadopoulosY. (2018). First report of Alternaria alternata causing leaf spot and blight symptoms on alfalfa in Canada. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 40, 451–455. 10.1080/07060661.2018.1470111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AndrewsS. (2010). FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed March 27, 2023).

  • Google Scholar

• 3

  BassD.StentifordG. D.WangH. C.KoskellaB.TylerC. R. (2019). The pathobiome in animal and plant diseases. Rev. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 996–1008. 10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  BejermanN.RoumagnacP.NemchinovL. G. (2020). High-throughput sequencing for deciphering the virome of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Front. Microbiol. 11, 553109. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.553109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BolgerA. M.LohseM.UsadelB. (2014).Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  BriniF.YamamotoA.JlaielL.TakedaS.HoboT.Huy Q DinhH. Q.et al. (2011). Pleiotropic effects of the wheat dehydrin DHN-5 on stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 676–688. 10.1093/pcp/pcr030

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BrutonB. D.RedlinS. C.CollinsJ. K.SamsC. E. (1993). Postharvest decay of cantaloupe caused by Epicoccum nigrum. Plant Dis. 77, 1060–1062. 10.1094/PD-77-1060

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BushnellB. (2014). “BBMap: A fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner,” in 9th Annual Genomics of Energy & Environment Meeting, Walnut Creek, CA, USA. Available online at: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1241166 (accessed March 27, 2023).

  • Google Scholar

• 9

  ChenH.ZengY.YangY.HuangL.TangB.ZZhangH.et al. (2020). Allele-aware chromosome-level genome assembly and efficient transgene-free genome editing for the autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa. Nat. Commun. 11, 2494. 10.1038/s41467-020-16338-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  ChenQ.JiangJ. R.ZhangG. Z.CaiL.CrousP. W. (2015). Resolving the Phoma enigma. Stud. Mycol. 82,137–217. 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.10.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  DahanJ.WolfY. I.OrellanaG. E.WenningerE. J.KooninE. V.KarasevA. V. (2022). A novel flavi-like virus in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) crops along the Snake River Valley. Viruses. 14,1320. 10.3390/v14061320

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  DilliesM. A.RauA.AubertJ.Cennequet-AntierC.JeanmouginM.ServantN.et al. (2013). A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief. Bioinformat.14, 671–683. 10.1093/bib/bbs046

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  GetachewM. A.GurrG. M.PilkingtonL. J. (2015). “Bacterial and mollicute diseases,” in Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases and Pests, Samac, D. A., Rhodes, L. H., and Lamp, W. O. (eds.). St. Paul, MN: The American Phythopathological Society Press, 58–59.

  • Google Scholar

• 14

  HeydariA.KhodakaramianG.ZafariD. (2012). Characterization of Pseudomonas viridiflava causing alfalfa root rot disease in Hamedan province of Iran. Plant Pathol. Microb. 3, 5. 10.4172/2157-7471.1000135

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  HildebrandD. C.PalleroniN. J.HendsonM.TothJ.JohnsonJ. L. (1994). Pseudomonas flavescens sp. nov., isolated from walnut blight cankers. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44, 410–415. 10.1099/00207713-44-3-410

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  HuangH. C. (2015). “Verticillium Wilt,” in Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases and Pests, Samac, D. A., Rhodes, L. H., and Lamp, W. O. (eds.). St. Paul, MN: The American Phythopathological Society Press, 50–52.

  • Google Scholar

• 17

  HubbardA.LewisC. M.YoshidaK.Ramirez-GonzalezR. H.de Vallavieille-PopeC.ThomasJ.et al. (2015). Field pathogenomics reveals the emergence of a diverse wheat yellow rust population. Genome Biol. 25, 16–23. 10.1186/s13059-015-0590-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  HusonD.BeierS.FladeI.GorskaA.El-HadidiM.MitraS.et al. (2016). MEGAN Community Edition - Interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput. Biol.12, e1004957. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004957

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  IrwinJ. A. G.ArmourD. J. (2015). “Stagnospora leaf spot and root rot,” in Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases and Pests, Samac, D. A., Rhodes, L. H., and Lamp, W. O. St. Paul, MN: The American Phythopathological Society Press, 48–50.

  • Google Scholar

• 20

  JonesA. T.McGavinW. J.GeppV.ZimmermanM. T.ScottS. W. (2006). Purification and properties of blackberry chlorotic ringspot, a new virus species in subgroup 1 of the genus Ilarvirus found naturally infecting blackberry in the UK. Ann. Appl. Biol. 149, 125–135. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00078.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  KoverP. X.SchaalB. A. (2002). Genetic variation for disease resistance and tolerance among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 99,11270–11274. 10.1073/pnas.102288999

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  LeeJ. H.YunH. S.Chian KwonC. (2012). Molecular communications between plant heat shock responses and disease resistance. Mol. Cells. 34, 109–116. 10.1007/s10059-012-0121-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  LiD.LiuC.-M.LuoR.SadakaneK.LamT.-W. (2015). MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics31, 1674–1676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  LiX.KerriganJ.ChaiW.SchnabelG. (2012). Botrytis caroliniana, a new species isolated from blackberry in South Carolina. Mycologia104, 650–658. 10.3852/11-218

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  LippsS. M.LenzP.SamacD. A. (2019). First report of bacterial stem blight of alfalfa caused by Pseudomonas viridiflava in California and Utah.Plant Dis.103, 12. 10.1094/PDIS-05-19-1044-PDN

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  LiuH.WangG.YangZ.WangY.ZhangZ.LiL.et al. (2020). Identification and characterization of a pear chlorotic leaf spot-associated virus, a novel emaravirus associated with a severe disease of pear trees in China. Plant Dis. 104, 2786–2798. 10.1094/PDIS-01-20-0040-RE

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  LiuY.SongQ.LiD.YangX.LiD. (2017). Multifunctional roles of plant dehydrins in response to environmental stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1018. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  LockhartB.MollovD.OlszewskiN.GoldsmithN. (2017). Identification, transmission and genomic characterization of a new member of the family Caulimoviridae causing a flower distortion disease of Rudbeckia hirta. Virus Res. 241, 62–67. 10.1016/j.virusres.2017.05.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  MannaaM.SeoY.-S. (2021). Plants under the attack of allies: Moving towards the plant pathobiome paradigm. Plants (Basel).10:125. 10.3390/plants10010125

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  MeleshkoD.MohimaniH.TracannaV.HajirasoulihaI.MedemaM. H.KorobeynikovA.et al. (2019). BiosyntheticSPAdes: reconstructing biosynthetic gene clusters from assembly graphs. Genome Res. 29,1352–1362. 10.1101/gr.243477.118

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  MolineH. E.KulikM. M. (1997). Contamination and deterioration of alfalfa sprouts caused by a seedborne isolate of Erwinia herbicola. J. Food Qual.20, 53–60. 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1997.tb00451.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  MonterosM. J.BoutonJ. H. (2009). “The future of alfalfa and forage crops,” in Proceedings, Western Alfalfa & Forage Conference, December 2-4, 2009, (Reno, NV).

  • Google Scholar

• 33

  MoslemiA.AdesP. K.GroomT.NicolasM. E.TaylorP. W. J. (2017). Alternaria infectoria and Stemphylium herbarum, two new pathogens of pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium) in Australia Australasian Plant. Pathology46, 91–101. 10.1007/s13313-016-0463-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  NemchinovL. G.IrishB.GrinsteadS.ShaoJ.VieiraP. (2022). Diversity of the virome associated with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Sci. Rep. 12, 8726. 10.1038/s41598-022-12802-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  NemchinovL. G.ShaoJ.PostnikovaO. A. (2015). Complete Genome Sequence of the Alfalfa latent virus. Genome Announc. 2015, 3. 10.1128/genomeA.00250-15

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  NirenbergH. I.O'DonnellK. (1998). New Fusarium species and combinations within the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia90, 434–458. 10.1080/00275514.1998.12026929

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  OgórekR.PrzywaraK.PiecuchA.CalM.LejmanA.MatkowskiK. (2020). Plant–fungal interactions: a case study of Epicoccoum nigrum Link. Plants (Basel) (2020) 9:1691. 10.3390/plants9121691

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  OkadaR.CongC. K.ValverdeR. A.SabanadzovicS.AokiN.Shunsuke HotateS.et al. (2013). Molecular characterization of two evolutionarily distinct endornaviruses co-infecting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Gen. Virol.94, 220–229. 10.1099/vir.0.044487-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  Ophel-KellerK. M. (2015). “Bacterial Wilt,” in Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases and Pests, Samac, D.A., Rhodes, L.H., and Lamp, W.O. (eds). St. Paul, MN: The American Phythopathological Society Press, 62–63.

  • Google Scholar

• 40

  PanY.WuH.DiR. (2020). First report of powdery mildew caused by Microidium phyllanthi on chamber bitter (Phyllanthus urinaria) in China. Plant Dis. 104, 8. 10.1094/PDIS-02-20-0398-PDN

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  Paysan-LafosseT.BlumM.ChuguranskyS.GregoT.PintoB. L.SalazarG. A.et al. (2023). InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res.51:D418–D427. 10.1093/nar/gkac993

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  PostnikovaO. A.IrishB. M.EisenbackJ.NemchinovL. G. (2023). Snake River alfalfa virus, a persistent virus infecting alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Washington State, USA. Virol. J. 20, 32. 10.1186/s12985-023-01991-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  PoudelB.HoT.LaneyA.KhadgiA.TzanetakisI. E. (2014). Epidemiology of Blackberry chlorotic ringspot virus. Plant Dis. 98, 547–550. 10.1094/PDIS-08-13-0866-RE

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  SamacD. A.RhodesL. H.LampW. O. (2015). Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases and Pests, Third Edition. St. Paul, MN: The American Phytopathological Society.

  • Google Scholar

• 45

  SmithM. A. (2015). “Stemphylium leaf spot,” in Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases and Pests, Samac, D. A., Rhodes, L. H., Lamp, W. O. (eds.). St. Paul, MN: The American Phythopathological Society Press, 21–24.

  • Google Scholar

• 46

  StutevilleD. L.ErwinD. C. (1990). Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases, 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: APS Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 47

  SummersC. G. (1998). Integrated pest management in forage alfalfa. Integrated Pest Manage. Rev. 3,127–154. 10.1023/A:1009654901994

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  TangeO. (2018). GNU Parallel 2018, March 2018.

  • Google Scholar

• 49

  TóthB.CsöszM.DijksterhuisJ.FrisvadJ.VargaJ. (2007). Pithomyces chartarum as a pathogen of wheat. J. Plant Pathol. 89, 405–408.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  TrivediP.LeachJ. E.TringeS. GSaT.SinghB. K. (2020). Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621. 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  VailleauF.SartorelE.JardinaudM. F.ChardonF.GeninS.HuguetT.et al. (2007). Characterization of the interaction between the bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and the model legume plant Medicago truncatula. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.20, 159–167. 10.1094/MPMI-20-2-0159

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  Vayssier-TaussatM.AlbinaE.CittiC.CossonJ. F.JacquesM. A.LebrunM. H. (2014). Shifting the paradigm from pathogens to pathobiome: new concepts in the light of meta-omics. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4, 29. 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  Vélez-OlmedoJ. B.FribourgC. E.MeloF. L.NagataT.de OliveiraA. S.ResendeR. O. (2021). Tobamoviruses of two new species trigger resistance in pepper plants harbouring functional L alleles. J. Gen. Virol. 102, 2. 10.1099/jgv.0.001524

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  Vidaurre-BarahonaD.Wang-WongA.Uribe-LoríoL. (2021). Erwinia billingiae causes bacterial canker of mango (Mangifera indica) in Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana32, 306–315. 10.15517/am.v32i1.40965

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  WoudenbergJ. H. C.GroenewaldJ. Z.BinderM.CrousP. W. (2013). Alternaria redefined. Stud. Mycol. 75, 171–212. 10.3114/sim0015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  YangB.ZhaoY.GuoZ. (2022). Research progress and prospect of alfalfa resistance to pathogens and pests. Plants11, 2008. 10.3390/plants11152008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  YangH.LuoP. (2021). Changes in photosynthesis could provide important insight into the interaction between wheat and fungal pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8865. 10.3390/ijms22168865

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  YangS.MaoQ.WangY.HeJ.YangJ.ChenX.et al. (2022). Expanding known viral diversity in plants: virome of 161 species alongside an ancient canal. Environ Microbiome17, 58. 10.1186/s40793-022-00453-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar