Abstract
Introduction:
Rice false smut caused by Ustilaginoidea virens, is a destructive fungal disease encountered in many rice-producing areas worldwide. To determine the process by which U. virens infects rice spikelets in the field.
Methods:
The green fluorescent protein-labeled U. virens was used as an inoculum to conduct artificial inoculation on rice at the booting stage via non-destructive panicle sheath instillation inoculation.
Results:
The results showed that the conidia of U. virens germinated on the surface of rice glumes and produced hyphae, which clustered at the mouth of rice glumes and entered the glumes through the gap between the palea and lemma. The conidia of U. virens colonized in rice floral organs, which led to pollen abortion of rice. U. virens wrapped the whole rice floral organ, and the floral organ-hyphae complex gradually expanded to open the glumes to form a rice false smut ball, which was two to three times larger than that observed in normal rice.
Discussion:
Panicle sheath instillation inoculation was shown to be a non-destructive inoculation method that could simulate the natural infection of U. virens in the field. The entire infection process of U. virens was visualized, providing a theoretical reference for formulating strategies to control rice false smut in the field.
1. Introduction
Rice false smut is a fungal disease prevalent in rice-producing regions worldwide, and is caused by Ustilaginoidea virens that infects the rice panicles (; ; ). In recent years, due to the large-scale promotion of high-yield hybrid varieties, excessive application of chemical fertilizers, and impact of climate change, rice false smut has transitioned from a minor disease to a major disease affecting current rice production (). Rice false smut not only seriously decreases the yield and quality of rice, but also produces ustiloxin toxins which is toxic to human beings and animals, thus affecting the rice safety (; ; ; ; ). This fungus also produces ustilaginoidins, a class of bis-naphthol-γ-pyrrolone compounds with inhibitory effects on radicle elongation cells of rice seeds (). Since the mycelial growth of U. virens is slow under artificial culture conditions and the occurrence of rice false smut is greatly affected by the environmental conditions, artificial inoculation of U. virens is not satisfactory (; ). At present, injection inoculation is the widely used to determine the pathogenicity of U. virens and evaluate the resistance level of rice to rice false smut (; ). In this method, a mixture of mycelia and conidia of U. virens is injected into the panicle sheath of rice at the booting stage to induce rice false smut (). The rate of diseased panicles of rice at the late booting stage was found to be higher than that other times. The inoculation temperature and humidity have great influence on the success rate of diseased panicles. The rate of diseased panicles upon inoculation at 20°C is significantly lower than that upon inoculation at 28°C (). In addition, appropriate low temperature stimulation and moisture treatment can promote infection by U. virens (). Nevertheless, injection inoculation damages the panicle sheath of rice that acts as a physical barrier. Therefore, it is difficult to explain how U. virens enters the panicle bud of rice in the field conditions by injection inoculation (). Establishing an efficient and stable inoculation method to simulate the natural infection process of U. virens would be conducive to studying the behavior of U. virens in the field (; ).
To achieve targeted prevention and control, it is essential to determine the natural infection process of U. virens in the field. In our previous studies, panicle sheath instillation did not destroy the structure of rice and successfully produced rice false smut balls, indicating that it is a nondestructive inoculation technique (). Comparison between panicle sheath instillation and injection showed that the rice false balls formed via panicle sheath instillation and natural infection were mainly distributed in the middle and lower parts of the rice panicle, whereas those formed via injection were mainly distributed in the middle and upper parts of the rice panicle (). Thus, panicle sheath instillation was considered as the inoculation technique to simulate the natural infection of U. virens, and it is speculated that U. virens in the field can enter the panicle sheath through the gap in the panicle sheath to complete infection (). However, the infection process of U. virens inoculated using the panicle sheath drip method remains unclear. To visualize the entire infection process of U. virens, the rice panicle was inoculated with U. virens labeled with green fluorescent protein at the booting stage using panicle sheath instillation. This study will provide a theoretical reference for formulating strategies to control rice false smut.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Strains of U. virens
The wild-type U. virens UV-PD11 strain and the green fluorescent protein-labeled U. virens gfp-z1, gfp-z2, and gfp-z3 strains were stored at the Institute of Crop Protection, Guizhou University.
2.2. Preparation of culture medium
Potato sucrose agar medium (PSA) and potato sucrose medium (PSB) were prepared. A total of 200 g of fresh potatoes were cut into thin slices, boiled for 30 min, filtered with three layers of gauze, and supplemented with 20 g of sucrose and 20 g of agar powder in a beaker with 1,000 ml of purified water. The medium were sterilized using a high-pressure steam sterilization pot (Shanghai ShenAn Medical Equipment Factory, Shanghai, China) at 121°C for 30 min. The procedure for preparing PSB medium was the same as that for preparing PSA medium, except that agar powder was not added.
2.3. Colony morphology and growth rate
The UV-PD11, gfp-z1, gfp-z2, and gfp-z3 strains were each inoculated into PSA medium. After 10 days, the colony diameter was recorded and the average growth rate was calculated using the following Equation 1.
2.4. Rice cultivation
The seeds of the indica rice variety ‘Jinyou 785’ (Guizhou Jinnong Technology Co., Ltd., Guizhou, China) were disinfected with 75% ethanol (Shandong Chituma Medical Treatment Technology Co., Ltd., Shandong, China) and rinsed thoroughly with sterile water. Field management was carried out according to conventional rice cultivation measures, and fungicides were not used in the experimental area.
2.5. Nondestructive artificial inoculation method
The panicle sheath instillation was performed as follows: 5 cm PSA medium of U. virens was inoculated into 100 ml of PSB medium and cultured under shaking at 28°C and 130 rpm for 6 days. The mycelium of U. virens was ground and filtered with three layers of gauze to obtain hypha spore suspension. The filtrate was diluted with PSB medium to a final concentration of 1 × 106 spores/ml hypha spore suspension as the inoculum. Inoculation was performed at stages 6–8 of young panicle differentiation of rice, with each inoculum having a volume of 3 ml. The filtrate was dripped into the panicle sheath of rice at a rate of 40 drops per minute. The rice panicle sheath was wrapped with a plastic film for heat and moisture preservation, which was removed after 3 days.
2.6. Visualization of the infection process of U. virens
The rice variety ‘Jinyou 785’ was inoculated with the hypha spore suspension of the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, gfp-z3, and UV-PD11 using panicle sheath instillation. The samples were taken at 3, 6, 8, 12, 15, and 18 days, and the spikelets on the rice panicles were cut. A single spikelet was cut with a double-edged blade and observed under a fluorescence microscope. The fluorescence light source of the microscope was turned on, and the excitation block was turned to the blue light source (wavelength 450–480 nm) to observe the colonization and expansion of U. virens in the rice floral organs (filament, stigma, style, and ovary). Each treatment included 7 rice plants and 3 replicates, with a total of 21 plants. The average rate of diseased panicles was calculated using Equation 2, and the significance was analyzed.
Pd, diseased panicle rate; Nd, number of diseased panicles; Nt, total number of panicles.
2.7. Reisolation and fluorescence detection of U. virens
The bright green fluorescence of the rice false smut balls could be detected under a fluorescence microscope (Ningbo Yongxin Optical Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China), which was selected as the isolation material. The rice false smut balls were clamped with sterile tweezers, and the chlamydospore powder was knocked down to the surface of the rifampicin-containing PSA medium by tapping the tweezers. The culture medium was cultured in the dark at a constant temperature (28°C) for 3–4 days, and then white-spot colonies were observed on the surface of the PSA culture medium. These colonies were picked out and placed in fresh PSA medium after 12 days. The morphology of the colonies was observed, and the fluorescence intensity was detected under a fluorescence microscope. The labeled hyphae of U. virens were picked out with a sterile inoculation needle and gently applied to the center of the groove of the glass slide. After the cover glass was covered, water around the cover glass was removed with absorbent paper and observed under a fluorescence microscope. A high-pressure mercury lamp was turned on and preheated for 15 min before performing the observations. U. virens was observed under a low-power bright field and with the bright-field light source turned off. The fluorescent light source of the fluorescence microscope was then turned on and the blue light source (wavelength 450–480 nm) was selected using the excitation block dial.
2.8. Statistical analysis
DPS software was used to analyze the variance of the experimental results. Here, p < 0.05 was considered to reflect a significant difference, whereas p < 0.01 was considered to reflect a very significant difference.
3. Results
3.1. Colony morphology of U. virens
The morphological characteristics and growth rates of the wild-type strain UV-PD11 and green fluorescent protein-labeled strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, and gfp-z3 were measured to determine whether there were differences in the biological characteristics. The colony of UV-PD11 was generally round in shape with dense white hyphae, a raised center resembling a hat, and bright yellow color at the back, which turned dark green at the late stage of culture. The colonies of the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, and gfp-z3 were round overall and the hyphae were dense. The colony back of the green fluorescent protein-labeled strains was bright yellow, which were similar to those of the U. virens strain UV-PD11. There were no significant difference in the growth rate among the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, gfp-z3, and UV-PD11, indicating that there was no significant differences in morphology and growth rate between strains labeled with green fluorescent protein and wild-type strains (Supplementary Figure 1).
3.2. Mycelial morphology of U. virens
The growth of the apical hyphae of the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, gfp-z3, and UV-PD11 was compared to determine the morphological differences between the obtained transformants and the wild-type strain UV-PD11. The results showed that the hyphae of the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, gfp-z3, and UV-PD11 were pale yellow. There was no significant difference in hyphal thickness and diaphragm number of U. virens, and many branches were bifurcated (Supplementary Figure 2). Therefore, there was no significant difference in hyphal morphology between the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, and gfp-z3 and the wild-type strain UV-PD11.
3.3. Pathogenicity difference in U. virens
To explore the changes in the pathogenicity of U. virens, the rice variety ‘Jinyou 785’ was inoculated with the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, gfp-z3, and UV-PD11 using panicle sheath instillation. The average rate of diseased panicles was determined, and the significance of its differences among the strains was analyzed. The average rates of infected panicles of the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, gfp-z3, and UV-PD11 were 90.48, 80.95, 85.71, and 90.48%, respectively. There was no significant difference in pathogenicity among the strains gfp-z1, gfp-z2, gfp-z3, and UV-PD11 (Supplementary Figure 3).
3.4. Visualization of the infection process of U. virens
3.4.1. Colonization of U. virens on the rice glumes
The rice was inoculated with gfp-z1 strain after 12 h, which were sampled and observed. It was difficult to observe the conidia of U. virens on the surface of the glumes under bright-field conditions (Figure 1). However, the conidia of U. virens could be observed in the dark field observation, and some conidia began to germinate and form hyphae under the excitation of blue light from the fluorescence microscope.
FIGURE 1
3.4.2. Clustering of U. virens between the palea and lemma
Three days after inoculation with gfp-z1 strain, the glume samples of rice were observed under an upright fluorescence microscope (Ningbo Yongxin Optical Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China) (Figure 2). It was found that a large number of conidia of U. virens on the surface of glume began to germinate, spread, and extend. Meanwhile, the gap between palea and lemma in rice and the awn around the spikelet shell emitted bright fluorescence, which indicated that numerous hyphae of U. virens had clustered there. This might have been due to the special structure of the gap between the palea and lemma, which was conducive to the attachment and colonization of U. virens. U. virens might enter the glume through the space between the palea and lemma of rice.
FIGURE 2
3.4.3. Entry of U. virens into the rice glume
In a few rice stigmas, fluorescence could be detected on the sixth day after inoculation, which indicated that the conidia of U. virens had entered the glume from the outside. Some rice stigmas emitted bright green fluorescence under the blue light excitation of the fluorescence microscope, indicating that the rice stigmas were wrapped by the hyphae of U. virens (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3
3.4.4. Wrapping of rice floral organs with U. virens
On the eighth day after inoculation with gfp-z1 strain, the surface of stamen and pistil of rice flowers were covered by a large number of white hyphae, forming a flower hyphae complex. The strong fluorescence was observed under the fluorescence microscope, which indicated that the hyphae of U. virens had mainly gathered in the middle and lower parts of the stamens and had continuously extended to the top of the anthers. The development of rice floral organs was affected by U. virens, the anthers were shriveled, and the elongation of filaments was inhibited, which led to the failure of normal rice flowering (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4
3.4.5. Fluorescence was detected on rice false smut balls
The rice anthers had seriously withered 12 days after inoculation with gfp-z1 strain, and a large number of hyphae of U. virens clustered in the lower part of the anthers, whereas only a few hyphae clustered in the upper part. After 15 days, rice false smut balls were clearly visible to the naked eye. Bright green fluorescence could be detected in the whole rice false smut balls excited by blue light, whereas the control group rice inoculated with unlabeled U. virens exhibited no fluorescence (Figure 5).
FIGURE 5
3.5. Anatomical observation of rice false smut balls
In the horizontal and vertical sections of the rice false smut balls, the anthers and stigma of rice were clearly visible. The anthers were butterfly-shaped and the stigma was radial, all of which were tightly embedded by the white hyphae of U. virens. Under the fluorescence microscope, strong fluorescence could be detected in the infected area. The stigma and anther were tightly wound by U. virens, and the stigma was brown when the rice false smut ball was transected (Figure 6).
FIGURE 6
3.6. Formation process of rice false smut balls
U. virens inoculated rice spikelets and uninoculated rice spikelets were sampled, observed under a stereoscope, and photographed to record the formation process of rice false smut balls. The entire floral organ of rice was wrapped by U. virens, which led to an inability of the rice to bloom normally. A massive structure (floral organ – U. virens complex) was observed under the stereoscope, which gradually expanded and finally opened the glumes, forming rice false smut balls that were two to three times larger than those observed in normal uninfected rice. The rice false smut ball was bright yellow at the early stage, which then turned into yellow-green and dark green at the later stage. Meanwhile, the chlamydospore on the surface of the rice false smut balls changed from a nondormant to a dormant state. The floral organs of normal rice grains were scattered, the anthers, filaments, and stigma were clearly visible under a stereomicroscope. At the later stage, the filaments stretched, the glume expanded and then extended outward, the anthers burst, and the pollen fell off and scattered randomly on floral organs, such as rice stigma and filaments. After pollination, the glume closed and the successfully pollinated ovary gradually expanded and filled (Figure 7).
FIGURE 7
3.7. Reisolation of the strain gfp-R1
The rice false smut balls with green fluorescence were isolated to obtain a strain of U. virens. As shown in Figure 8, the colonies of the obtained U. virens were white at the early stage and pale yellow at the late stage. The back of the colony was orange and the center of the colony was dark green, which were the typical characteristics of U. virens at the late stage. Observation of the strain under a fluorescence microscope revealed that the colony, conidia, and hyphae of the strain gfp-R1 emitted bright fluorescence. The obtained gene encoding green fluorescent protein was stably inherited and expressed in U. virens. This indicated that rice false smut produced via inoculation with the strain labeled by green fluorescent protein could be preserved, so that the U. virens with strong pathogenicity and expressing gfp could still be obtained at the later stage.
FIGURE 8
3.8. The infection process of U. virens
Rice false smut could be produced through inoculation of rice via panicle sheath instillation at stages 6–8 of rice young panicle differentiation (as shown in Figure 9), which could potentially explain the natural infection pathway of U. virens in the field. Based on findings in this study, a schematic of the process of U. virens infection was constructed (Figure 9). The conidia of U. virens were produced from sclerotia or chlamydospore, which became an important infection source. In the field, during the sixth to eighth stages of rice young panicle differentiation, the conidia of U. virens could enter the panicle bracts through the panicle sheath gap via rain or dew. The conidia of U. virens germinated on the surface of rice hulls to produce hyphae, which entered the glumes through the gap between the palea and lemma. U. virens randomly attached to the surface of the floral organs, causing pollen abortion, and absorbed nutrients from the rice floral organs to form rice false smut balls.
FIGURE 9
4. Discussion
In recent years, many reports on rice false smut caused by U. virens in rice-growing areas worldwide have been published (). Nevertheless, when and how the conidia of U. virens enter the rice spikelets in the field remains unclear (). To characterize the natural infection process of U. virens, green fluorescent protein-labeled U. virens was used as the inoculum to inoculate rice via the nondestructive panicle sheath drip irrigation method, so that the entire infection process of U. virens could be clearly visualized. The results showed that U. virens germinated on the glume surface of rice and entered the rice via the gap between the palea and lemma. The pathogen colonized the floral organ, hijacked the nutrients of the rice, and formed rice false smut balls, which were two to three times larger than those observed in normal uninfected rice. The results of this study provide a reference for the formulation of strategies to control rice false smut in the field.
The panicle sheath of rice is relatively sealed and plays an important role in preserving heat and retaining moisture, while facilitating the germination and colonization of U. virens on the surface of the rice glume (, ). Therefore, the natural process of U. virens infection might occur before the breakage of rice young panicle. After 3 days of inoculation with U. virens, bright fluorescence appeared between the palea and lemma of rice, indicating that a large number of hyphae of U. virens had clustered there, which promoted the attachment and colonization of U. virens due to the special structure of the palea and lemma. Observation of the sections of rice glume showed no fluorescence in the outer skin cells, which indicated that it was difficult for U. virens to directly penetrate the glume epidermis into the glume. Meanwhile, studies have shown that U. virens colonizes rice roots and mainly grows in intercellular spaces but has difficulty directly penetrating cell walls, which is consistent with the results obtained in the present study (; ). After 6 days of inoculation with U. virens, fluorescence was detected in a few stigmas, indicating that U. virens had successfully entered the rice glume. In addition, the hyphae of U. virens mainly clustered in the middle and lower stamens and continuously extended to the top of the anthers, which affected anther development. Inhibition of the elongation of filaments led to the failure of normal flowering of rice. Researchers found that U. virens mainly colonized the base of rice filaments, because the gap between filament cells was large, which aided the propagation and infection of pathogens (; ). It is worth noting that the hyphae of U. virens extend along the intercellular space of the filaments instead of penetrating the cell wall of rice (). To identify the source of nutrients used for the formation of rice false smut balls, researchers found that the balls could be divided into three layers from interior to exterior. The innermost layer is composed of white hyphae, the middle orange-colored layer is composed of hyphae and chlamydospores, and the outermost layer is composed of chlamydospores (). The pistils and stamens of rice were embedded by the hyphae of U. virens. The ovary was full and emerald green at the early stage and dry and dark brown at the late stage. Therefore, it was speculated that the rice ovary may be the main source of nutrients for the formation of rice false smut balls (). In this study, bright fluorescence was observed around the floral organ, which indicated that the ovary, filament, and anther of rice were wrapped by the hyphae of U. virens. There was no fluorescence in the anther, pollen, and stigma, which provides new evidence that U. virens cannot penetrate the floral organs.
In this study, the main infection process of U. virens was revealed through careful observation and recording, thereby providing a theoretical basis for the formulation of strategies to control rice false smut in the field.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
ML, RL, and XH: conceptualization. XH, XW, and JW: investigation. XH, YZ, and JW: methodology. YZ: software. XH and JW: writing—original draft preparation and writing—review and editing. All authors had read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by Qian Jiao Ji [2022]328, Qian Jiao Ji [2022]052, and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32160657 and 32160658).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1228597/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AshizawaT.TakahashiM.MoriwakiJ.HirayaeK. (2011). A refined inoculation method to evaluate false smut resistance in rice.J. Gen. Plant Pathol.7710–16. 10.1007/s10327-010-0279-5
2
ChaoJ.JinJ.WangD.HanR.ZhuR.ZhuY.et al (2017). Cytological and transcriptional dynamics analysis of host plant revealed stage-specific biological processes related to compatible rice-Ustilaginoidea virens interaction.PLoS One9:91391. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091391
3
FanJ.GuoX. Y.LiL.HuangF.SunW. X.LiY.et al (2015). Infection of Ustilaginoidea virens intercepts rice seed formation but activates grain-filling-related genes.J. Integr. Plant Biol.57577–590. 10.1111/jipb.12299
4
FanJ.YangJ.WangY. Q.LiG. B.LiY.HuangF.et al (2016). Current understanding on Villosiclava virens, a unique flower-infecting fungus causing rice false smut disease.Mol. Plant Pathol.171321–1330. 10.1111/mpp.12362
5
FuX.WangX.CuiY.WangA.LaiD.LiuY.et al (2015). A monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of ustiloxin A in rice false smut balls and rice samples.Food Chem.181140–145. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.068
6
GuoX.LiY.FanJ.LiL.HuangF.WangW. (2012). Progress in the study of false smut disease in rice.J. Agr. Sci. Tech.21211–1217.
7
HanY.ZhangK.YangJ.ZhangN.FangA.ZhangY.et al (2015). Differential expression profiling of the early response to Ustilaginoidea virens between false smut resistant and susceptible rice varieties.BMC Genomics16:955. 10.1186/s12864-015-2193-x
8
HeH.SoponeW.YuanJ.YangX.ChenX.WuS.et al (2015). Biology and artificial inoculation of Ustilaginoidea virens (Cooke) Takahashi in rice.Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.9821–830. 10.5897/AJMR2014.6736
9
HuM.LuoL.WangS.LiuY.LiJ. (2014). Infection processes of Ustilaginoidea virens during artificial inoculation of rice panicles.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.13967–77. 10.1007/s10658-013-0364-7
10
HuX.WangJ.LiR.WuX.GaoX.MingL. (2021). Establishment of an artificial inoculation method of Ustilaginoidea virens without damaging the rice panicle sheaths.Plant Dis.106289–296. 10.1094/PDIS-12-20-2746-RE
11
JiaQ.LvB.GuoM.LuoC.ZhengL.HsiangT.et al (2015). Effect of rice growth stage, temperature, relative humidity and wetness duration on infection of rice panicles by Villosiclava virens.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.14115–25. 10.1007/s10658-014-0516-4
12
KoisoY.NatoriM.IwasakiS.SatoS.SonodaR.FujitaY.et al (1992). Ustiloxin: A phytotoxin and a mycotoxin from false smuth balls on rice panicles.Tetrahedron Lett.334157–4160.
13
LiY.WangM.LiuZ.ZhangK.CuiF.SunW. (2019). Towards understanding the biosynthetic pathway for ustilaginoidin mycotoxins in Ustilaginoidea virens.Environ. Microbiol.212629–2643. 10.1111/1462-2920.14572
14
MengJ.SunW.MaoZ.XuD.WangX.LuS.et al (2015). Main ustilaginoidins and their distribution in rice false smut balls.Toxins74023–4034.
15
MiyazakiS.MatsumotoY.UchiharaT.MorimotoK. (2009). High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of Ustiloxin A in forage rice silage.J. Veter. Med. Sci.71239–241. 10.1292/jvms.71.239
16
PrakobsubK.AshizawaT. (2017). Intercellular invasion of rice roots at the seedling stage by the rice false smut pathogen Villosiclava virens.J. Gen. Plant Pathol.83358–361. 10.1007/s10327-017-0734-7
17
QiuJ.MengS.DengY.HuangS.KouY. (2019). Ustilaginoidea virens: A fungus infects rice flower and threats world rice production.Rice Sci.26199–206.
18
ShanT.SunW.LiuH.GaoS.LuS.WangM.et al (2012). Determination and analysis of Ustiloxins A and B by LC-ESI-MS and HPLC in false smut balls of rice.Int. J. Mol. Sci.1311275–11287. 10.3390/ijms130911275
19
SongJ. H.WeiW.LvB.LinY.YinW. X.PengY. L. (2016). Rice false smut fungus hijacks the rice nutrients supply by blocking and mimicking the fertilization of rice ovary.Environ. Microbiol.183840–3849. 10.1111/1462-2920.13343
20
SunW.DongX.XuD.MengJ.FuX.WangX.et al (2016). Preparative separation of main ustilaginoidins from rice false smut balls by high-speed counter-current chromatography.Toxins8:20. 10.3390/toxins8010020
21
SunW.FanJ.FangA.LiY.JaveedM.LiD.et al (2020). Ustilaginoidea virens: Insights into an emerging rice pathogen.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.58363–385. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012908
22
TanakaE.AshizawaT.SonodaR.TanakaC. (2008). Villosiclava virens gen. nov., comb. nov., teleomorph of Ustilaginoidea virens, the causal agent of rice false smut.Mycotaxon106491–501.
23
TanakaE.KumagawaT.ItoN.NakanishiA.OhtaY.SuzukiE.et al (2017). Colonization of the vegetative stage of rice plants by the false smut fungus Villosiclava virens, as revealed by a combination of species-specific detection methods.Plant Pathol.6656–66. 10.1111/ppa.12540
24
TangY. X.JinJ.HuD. W.YongM. L.XuY.HeL. P. (2013). Elucidation of the infection process of Ustilaginoidea virens (teleomorph: Villosiclava virens) rice spikelets.Plant Pathol.621–8. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02629.x
25
WangX.FuX.LinF.SunW.MengJ.WangA.et al (2016). The contents of ustiloxins A and B along with their distribution in rice false smut balls.Toxins8:262. 10.3390/toxins8090262
26
WeiS.WangY.ZhouJ.XiangS.SunW.PengX.et al (2020). The conserved effector UvHrip1 interacts with OsHGW and infection of Ustilaginoidea virens regulates defense and heading date-related signaling pathway.Int. J. Mol. Sci.21:3376.
27
YongM.LiuY.ChenT.FanL. (2018). Cytological studies on the infection of rice root by Ustilaginoidea virens.Microsc. Res. Techniq.81389–396.
28
ZhangY.ZhangK.FangA.HanY. H.YangJ.XueM.et al (2014). Specific adaptation of Ustilaginoidea virens in occupying host florets revealed by comparative and functional genomics.Nat. Commun.5:3849.
29
ZhouY.XieX. W.ZhangF.WangS. E.LiuX. Z.ZhuL.et al (2014). Detection of quantitative resistance loci associated with resistance to rice false smut (Ustilaginoidea virens) using introgression lines.Plant Pathol.63365–372. 10.1111/ppa.12091
Summary
Keywords
Ustilaginoidea virens, rice false smut, infection process, visualization, nondestructive inoculation
Citation
Hu X, Wang J, Zhang Y, Wu X, Li R and Li M (2023) Visualization of the entire process of rice spikelet infection by Ustilaginoidea virens through nondestructive inoculation. Front. Microbiol. 14:1228597. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1228597
Received
25 May 2023
Accepted
25 July 2023
Published
10 August 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Nuria Montes, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Spain
Reviewed by
Yan Meixin, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China; Guotian Li, Huazhong Agricultural University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Hu, Wang, Zhang, Wu, Li and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rongyu Li, lirongyu0328@126.comMing Li, lm21959@163.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.