Abstract
Azole antifungals are abundantly used in the environment and play an important role in managing fungal diseases in clinics. Due to the widespread use, azole resistance is an emerging global problem for all applications in several fungal species, including trans-kingdom pathogens, capable of infecting plants and humans. Azoles used in agriculture and clinics share the mode of action and facilitating cross-resistance development. The extensive use of azoles in the environment, e.g., for plant protection and wood preservation, contributes to the spread of resistant populations and challenges using these antifungals in medical treatments. The target of azoles is the cytochrome p450 lanosterol 14-α demethylase encoded by the CYP51 (called also as ERG11 in the case of yeasts) gene. Resistance mechanisms involve mainly the mutations in the coding region in the CYP51 gene, resulting in the inadequate binding of azoles to the encoded Cyp51 protein, or mutations in the promoter region causing overexpression of the protein. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued the first fungal priority pathogens list (FPPL) to raise awareness of the risk of fungal infections and the increasingly rapid spread of antifungal resistance. Here, we review the main issues about the azole antifungal resistance of trans-kingdom pathogenic fungi with the ability to cause serious human infections and included in the WHO FPPL. Methods for the identification of these species and detection of resistance are summarized, highlighting the importance of these issues to apply the proper treatment.
Introduction
Fungicides are the first line of treatments to control fungal diseases of plants, humans, and animals. Among the different types of antifungals, azoles are the most widely used and this is the only group applied both in medicine and in the environment (Snelders et al., 2012). Fungal infections affect hundreds of millions of people worldwide and cause more than 1.7 million deaths annually (Mota Fernandes et al., 2021). For the most devistating diseases, like invasive aspergillosis, the mortality rate can be as high as 90% (Mota Fernandes et al., 2021) and azole antifungals are the primary treatment options (Meis et al., 2016). Demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides (including azoles) are broadly used to control postharvest diseases, plant pathogenic fungi in agricultural fields, and preservation purposes. Around 2 million tons of agricultural azole fungicides were sold in 2020, and more than two-thirds of them were sold in Europe and Asia, occupying about 16% of the global fungicide volume market (Jørgensen and Heick, 2021). In wood preservation, fungicides are used to increase the durability of wood and inhibit the growth of decay fungi, and about 18% of the fungicides used for wood preservation are azoles (Jørgensen and Heick, 2021).
Azoles inhibit the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway by blocking the cytochrome P450 lanosterol 14-α demethylase encoded by the CYP51 gene (Becher and Wirsel, ), which has three paralogs (see below) in Pezizomycotina (Fungi, Ascomycota; Van Rhijn et al., 2021; Celia-Sanchez et al., ; Figure 1). Blocking the Cyp51 enzymes leads to the alteration of the fungal membrane integrity and the accumulation of deleterious sterols (Becher and Wirsel, ). In agriculture propiconazole, difenoconazole and tebuconazole are the most commonly used azoles (Ishii et al., 2021), while fluconazole (FLC), itraconazole (ITC), posaconazole (POS), and voriconazole (VRC) are the main antifungals during the treatment of humans infected by fungi—besides of amphotericin B (AMB) belonging to the polyene class, and echinocandins (Gisi, 2014). Although the chemical structure of those azoles are different, cross-resistance develops quickly because of the identical mode of action of the agricultural and clinical azoles (Gisi, 2014). For a detailed figure about the molecular structures of azoles and other antifungal compounds see Snelders et al. (2012).
Figure 1
Several species (e.g., Fusarium solani) have so-called intrinsic or primary resistance to one or more members of azole group (or any other antifungals), which is independent of previous exposure to these chemicals (Al-Hatmi et al., ). The secondary or acquired resistance develops when a pathogen has come into contact with antifungals, which can happen in the environment or during medical treatment (Gisi, 2014).
The widespread application contributes to the spread of azole-resistant genotypes of different species, including opportunistic pathogens like Aspergillus fumigatus (Verweij et al., 2013) and so-called trans-kingdom fungal pathogens like the Fusarium oxysporum species complex. The emergence of azole-resistant strains gained more attention during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic because viral pneumonia increases patients' susceptibility to bacterial and fungal superinfections (Koehler et al., 2021). The viral infection leads to immune dysfunction, and the secondary infection by fungicide-resistant species like A. fumigatus (Armstrong-James et al., ) or Rhizopus oryzae (Rao et al., 2021) became an additional contributing factor to mortality (Koehler et al., 2021).
Trans-kingdom fungal pathogens, capable of infecting plants and mammals, belong mainly to Ascomycota and Mucoromycota (Gauthier and Keller, 2013) and a few to Basidiomycota (Hu et al., 2021). These particular pathogens usually affect people with impaired immunity, e.g., those who have undergone organ transplantation (Gauthier and Keller, 2013). For multihost and crossover pathogens, Fusarium oxysporum is an outstanding example. Fusarium species are serious emerging pathogens of both humans and plants with a broad spectrum of antifungal resistance (Al-Hatmi et al., ; World Health Organization, 2022), underlining that the widespread application of azoles in agriculture poses a severe threat to the use of antifungals in the clinics and contributes to the loss of efficiency of these chemicals. The invasive fungal infection by a tomato pathogenic isolate of F. oxysporum and death of the immunodepressed mice were proven in pathogenicity tests, and it was also shown that the same virulence factors play functionally distinct roles in plant and animal pathogenesis (Ortoneda et al., 2004).
The World Health Organization (WHO) has just issued the first fungal priority pathogens list (WHO FPPL) to raise awareness of the risk of fungal infections and the increasingly rapid spread of antifungal resistance, thus strengthening the need for a global response to those problems (World Health Organization, 2022). Three priority groups (critical, high, and medium) of fungal pathogens were assigned based on multicriteria decision analysis. Prioritization criteria included for example, the average case fatality rate, level of acquired or intrinsic resistance to antifungal treatment and availability of diagnostics. The fungal species included in the final priority list cause mainly systemic invasive infections and are associated with high mortality and or morbidity (World Health Organization, 2022).
This review summarizes information about CYP51 paralogs and the key aspects of the azole resistance of those species included in the WHO FPPL (World Health Organization, 2022) which have agricultural connections and are or could be trans-kingdom pathogens. The resistance mechanisms and methods for detecting the fungal species and resistance are discussed, and the possible connection with plant pathology and agriculture as a source of problems for human health is highlighted (Figure 2). Only critical and high priority groups are discussed since the medium group, albeit there are fungi with a saprobic part of their lifecycle, as far we know, does not include species with a strong, direct connection with agriculture.
Figure 2
CYP51 paralogs
Until these days, five major gene family groups of CYP51 have been reported in Fungi: CYP51, CYP51A, CYP51B, CYP51C, and CYP51D (Van Rhijn et al., 2021; Celia-Sanchez et al., ). Basidiomycota, Saccharomycotina, Taphrinomycotina and early-diverging fungi (Blastocladiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Monoblepharidomycota, Zoopagomycota, and Mucormycota) have only CYP51 while the filamentous Ascomycota taxa, fungi in the Pezizomycotina subphylum, have either 1 or 2 or 3 copies of 4 CYP51 paralogs (Van Rhijn et al., 2021; Celia-Sanchez et al., ). It was reported earlier (Caramalho et al., ) that three species from Mucoromycota (Rhizopus arrhizus, R. microsporus, and Mucor circinelloides) have paralogs (CYP51 F1 and CYP51 F5), however, in R. miscrosporus Celia-Sanchez et al. () considered those paralogs as variants of CYP51 (CYP51.1 and CYP51.2).
According to Celia-Sanchez et al. () all filamentous Ascomycota have CYP51B paralog, and only 50% have a CYP51A paralog. A gene duplication event could be the origin of the CYP51A and CYP51B paralogs followed by multiple losses of CYP51A (Hawkins et al., 2014). The presence of CYP51C was described from roughly 10 genera or species and all are pathogens. The sequences of CYP51A, CYP51B, and CYP51C are ~60% identical, and the Cyp51 and Cyp51B proteins have 88% of shared amino acids in motifs (Celia-Sanchez et al., ). Both the Cyp51A and Cyp51B proteins are localized in the perinuclear and peripheral endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in the apical and subapical hyphal compartments and occasionally along the hyphal septa and apical tips (Roundtree et al., 2020).
Functional diversification was described between paralogs in several fungal species (Fan et al., 2013). In the case of the plant pathogen Fusarium graminearum CYP51C is essential in the colonization of the wheat ears and does not encode an enzyme with sterol demethylase activity. CYP51A and CYP51B both encode sterol 14a–demethylase; however the latter is essential for ascospore formation, and the former plays an important role in azole resistance (Fan et al., 2013). It was shown that point mutations in CYP51, considered by the authors as C paralog, can contribute to the reduced azole susceptibility in clinical and plant pathogenic Aspergillus flavus isolates (Hermida-Alava et al., 2021). In other species, like the human pathogen A. fumigatus, the function of CYP51A and CYP51B can be complementary or even synergistic (Chen et al., ; Roundtree et al., 2020; Handelman et al., 2021). Research using deletion mutants of CYP51A and CYP51B showed that the paralogs can exhibit different susceptibility to azoles and differentially bind these fungicides (Chen et al., ; Roundtree et al., 2020).
The CYP51D paralog was recently described by Van Rhijn et al. (2021) from azole-resistant Penicillium and Talaromyces isolates.
The critical priority group from the WHO FPPL
This group includes fungal species that have the highest perceived public health importance, namely: A. fumigatus, Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida auris, and C. albicans.
These fungi are not trans-kingdom pathogens, however the former two species strongly connect with agriculture, wood industry, and soils (Bastos et al., ). The fungi in the “critical group” (World Health Organization, 2022) will be briefly reviewed here because the environmental origin and azole resistance of those pathogens were discussed in detail by Bastos et al. ().
Aspergillus fumigatus is one of the most well-known and devastating causal agents of human mycoses, and the most common species involved in invasive aspergillosis (Verweij et al., 2020). It is also a saprotrophic, soil-born fungus, generally found on decaying plant material, e.g., in compost and flower bulb waste (Schoustra et al., 2019), air and soil samples of sawmills (Jeanvoine et al., 2017), and agricultural fields (Alvarez-Moreno et al., ). The environmental origin of the azole resistance of A. fumigatus has been repeatedly and undoubtedly shown (Verweij et al., 2013; Buil et al., ). This fungus is not a plant pathogen; therefore “agronomically used DMI fungicides are not directly targeted A. fumigatus, resistance selection is an unintended side effect” (Verweij et al., 2020).
Cryptococcus neoformans is a basidiomycetous yeast, besides other, medically less relevant Cryptococcus species, causes infections called cryptococcosis, including life-threatening meningoencephalitis (Idnurm et al., 2005). The occurrence of this soil-born fungus is often associated with animal droppings (Chen et al., ). Cryptococcus neoformans is not a plant pathogen, but it can be frequently isolated from decaying wood material, like hollows of carob trees and eucalyptus (Cogliati et al., ). On the other hand, as a common soil fungi it can be found in agricultural soils, too (Takahashi et al., 2020). Cross-resistance was observed between agricultural azole fungicides and clinical azoles several times in the case of environmental and clinical isolates (Bastos et al., ; Chen et al., ). Moreover, non-azole fungicides, like pyraclostrobin, can induce resistance to clinical azoles through overexpression of efflux pump genes (Bastos et al., ).
Candida species are responsible for many diseases, ranging from superficial mycosis to invasive candidiasis (Pappas et al., 2018). It has been recently shown that human pathogenic species, like C. albicans, survive in the environment for a prolonged time and can also be plant-associated, e.g., with oak trees (Bensasson et al., ; Opulente et al., 2019). It has been suggested as a possibility that the azole resistance in Candida species has environmental origins and it can be a result of the cross-resistance to agricultural fungicides (Morio, 2020; Castelo-Branco et al., ).
The high priority group from the WHO FPPL
Rhizopus arrhizus (syn. R. oryzae)
The order Mucorales is included in the high priority group of the WHO FPPL, of which R. arrhizus, an opportunistic human pathogen, is the most frequent causative agent of mucormycosis, and the leading cause of rhino–orbital–cerebral infections (Walther et al., 2019; Osaigbovo et al., 2023). This fungus causes ~70% of human mucormycoses (Roden et al., 2005) and mortality can be as high as 68–80% (Rabie and Althaqafi, 2012; Jeong et al., 2019; Osaigbovo et al., 2023). Usually the most common sites of infection are the skin, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and paranasal sinus. The latter is the most dangerous because of the rapidly progressing rhinocerebral infections (Wickes, 2013). Rhizopus arrhizus cause deadly infections mainly in immuno-compromised individuals and people suffering from hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus in ketoacidosis, other forms of metabolic acidosis, and other underlying conditions like treatment with corticosteroids, organ or bone marrow transplantation, neutropenia, traumatic disruption of the skin, and deferoxamine therapy in patients receiving hemodialysis (Ribes et al., 2000; Ibrahim et al., 2012; Jeong et al., 2019). In the case of SARS-CoV 2 and mucormycosis co-infection, due to the inappropriate establishment of the diagnosis and therapy, the mortality rate can be extremely high, more than 90%, as it was in India during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic in 2021 (Dam et al., ).
This fungus is characterized by rapid growth rates, aseptate hyphae, and wide distribution often found in soil, dung, and rotting vegetation. Due to its saprobic lifestyle, R. arrhizus produces a wide variety of commercially valuable metabolites (e.g., enzymes, alcohols, and organic acids) and is one of the leading producers of Asian fermented foods, like tempeh (Wickes, 2013). Rhizopus arrhizus (syn. R. oryzae) is also known as a plant pathogen, e.g., the causal agent of root rot (Haddoudi et al., 2021), and postharvest diseases of many species (Khokhar et al., 2019).
Pathogenesis and virulence factors
Infection by R. arrhizus (and other mucoralean species) can happen mainly through inhalation of the sporangiospores and traumatic disruption of the skin (e.g., burned wounds and usage of non-sterile adhesive tapes; Ibrahim et al., 2012; Choudhary et al., ). In the case of rhino- orbital-cerebral infection, penetration into the central nervous system occurs either by hematogenous spread or by direct cranial penetration from the paranasal sinuses (Chikley et al., ). Before the hyphal invasion of the brain tissue and the fatal outcome, a vascular occlusion leads to cerebral infarction and hemorrhagic necrosis in the central nervous system mucormycosis (Chikley et al., ).
During infection by R. arrhizus several virulence factors, which enable the pathogen to invade the host cells, were identified. Such a factor is the elevated levels of free iron in serum supporting the growth of the fungus and assisting in the spread at acidic pH in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (Ibrahim et al., 2012). Patients receiving dialysis or blood transfusions are also highly susceptible to mucormycosis, the former is due to the treatment with the iron chelator deferoxamine, and the latter is because of the high amount of iron from the transfusions (Ibrahim et al., 2012).
Glucose starvation induces the overexpression of the receptor GRP78 (glucose-regulated protein), another virulence factor that facilitates the colonization and damage of endothelial cells (Ibrahim et al., 2012). Bruno et al. () identified species-specific transcriptional antifungal host response pathways during the infection by R. oryzae. They found that the overexpression of GRP78 is connected with the reduced glycolysis and down-regulation of glycolysis genes, which negatively affects the symptoms of patients who have diabetes.
A protein synthesis inhibitor, ricin-like toxin, mucoricin was described as a critical virulence factor for the pathogenesis of mucoralean fungi. This toxin has an N-glycosylase activity, similar to the plant-originated ricin, and inhibiting the protein prevents human cell damage in vitro (Soliman et al., 2021). The CotH, spore surface proteins initiate the infection by interacting with the host endothelial cells, and the copy number influences the virulence of the species. The higher copy number is associated with higher aggressiveness of the mucoralean species; in the absence of these proteins, the species is avirulent (Tahiri et al., 2023).
Cryptic species and taxonomy
Rhizopus arrhizus is a complex of closely related heterothallic species which can be cosmopolitan saprotrophs and pathogens of different organisms (Ghosh and Ray, 2011). Multilocus phylogenetic studies identified two species with outcrossing population structure in this coplex (Gryganskyi et al., 2010). The two varieties, Rhizopus var. arrhizus and var. delemar, form two well-supported clades, but there are no differences in ecology, geographic distribution, and pathogenicity (Dolatabadi et al., 2014). Additionally, the morphological differences between the varieties were slight and quantitative (Zheng et al., 2007). The genome and transcriptome analysis of 30 mucormycosis-causing fungi (including Rhizopus and Mucor species) underlined that there are no alterations in virulence and in the ability of these strains to cause diseases in humans (Chibucos et al., ).
Presence in the environment
Rhizopus arrhizus is one of the most common environmental species of the genus, and it has been found in different locations (e.g., grasslands, forests; Ribes et al., 2000) and different sources, like diseased plant materials (e.g., fava bean; Haddoudi et al., 2021). Infection by Rhizopus species can happen through inhalation of spores or ingesting contaminated food (Ribes et al., 2000). In one case study, a liver transplant recipient was shown to have contracted the pathogen by inhaling spores from compost during gardening (Munckhof et al., 1993).
Rhizopus arrhizus is a well-known but not severe plant pathogen. It causes, among others, root rot of fava bean (Haddoudi et al., 2021) and mulberry (Gnanesh et al., 2021), soft rot of garlic (Zhang et al., 2022), and head rot of sunflower (Zhou et al., 2018). This fungus can also be associated with the postharvest rot of several species, like apple (Khokhar et al., 2019), strawberry (Wang et al., 2015), and mandarin (Moosa et al., 2020).
Recently the prevalence of human-pathogenic species of Mucorales has been assessed in commercially available foodstuffs in France. Based on nrDNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequences, molecular identification revealed that R. arrhizus var. arrhizus, and R. arrhizus var. delemar could frequently be isolated from food products, like spices, herbs, herbal tea, and cereals (Mousavi et al., 2019). This draws attention to earlier findings that ingesting contaminated food can cause gastrointestinal mucormycoses, affecting mainly malnourished infants and children (Richardson, 2009).
Azole fungicide resistance
Voriconazole and fluconazole, two of the main antifungal chemicals, so-called short-tailed azoles, have no activity against Mucorales in vitro (Almyroudis et al., ) nor in vivo (Pagano et al., 2013; Shih et al., 2022). Thus, the recommended first line treatment of mucormycosis is AMB and POS, the long-tailed azoles (Dannaoui et al., ). This selective resistance to antifungals was proven by several studies presenting that POS, ITC, and ravuconazole showed good or low activity, but VRC does not affect mucormycosis causing fungi (Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., ; Vitale et al., 2012; Borman et al., ; Pfaller et al., 2021; Shih et al., 2022).
Cornely et al. () published the global guideline on mucormycosis management considering the regional differences of the world. The recommended first-line treatment is the high-dose liposomal AMB and as salvage treatments, intravenous isavuconazole (ISA) and intravenous or delayed release tablet POS are suggested. This guideline underscores the importance of early diagnosis and the recognition of disease patterns.
Osaigbovo et al. (2023) reviewed mucormycosis cases from Africa from 1960 until 2022, discussing the treatments and overall survival rates. Approximately 82% of the patients received antifungal therapy, in 82.3% of these cases, AMB was used. In 10% of cases, POS was used for the treatment, while VRC and FLC, which were generally considered ineffective, were applied in 5.4 and 2.4% of the cases, respectively. Sixty percent of the patients survived, and ~40% died (Osaigbovo et al., 2023). Probably, the difficult accessibility explains the low use of antifungal agents, as it was presented that in Africa liposomal AMB was available in < 20% and POS in 5% of the institutions (Osaigbovo et al., 2023).
The invasive fungal infection data was summarized, including mucormycosis, from the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program, the longest-running antimicrobial surveillance programs monitoring the resistance patterns of pathogens (Pfaller et al., 2021, 2022). Pfaller et al. (2021) compared the SENTRY data with the susceptibility data of several strains tested with three azoles (VRC, POS, and ISA). They confirmed that VRC is ineffective against mucoralean species, POS was superior (MICs ranging from 0.5 to 4 mg) and the MIC values in the case of ISA were as high as with VRC when R. oryzae was tested (Pfaller et al., 2021). When younger (between 18 and 64 years of age) and older age group was compared based on the distribution of opportunistic invasive fungal infections and antifungal susceptibility data, they found that resistance to triazoles was less common in the older population (Pfaller et al., 2022). The antifungal susceptibility data were consistent with earlier results where POS was the most effective, and all the mucoralean species were resistant to VRC (Pfaller et al., 2022). Analyzation of nationwide, population-based data in Taiwan revealed that treatment with POS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and higher survival probability at 90 days after discharge compared to VRC (Shih et al., 2022). A review of clinical combination therapies against Mucorales showed that some synergistic interactions can be achieved (e.g., echinocandins with either azoles or AMB) and never antagonism. In some cases, 50% synergism was detected when AMB was combined with POS (Schwarz et al., 2019).
Only scarce information is available on the molecular basis of the antifungal resistance mechanism in Mucoralean fungi. Chau et al. () found that two amino acid changes, Y132F and F145M (Figure 1B), substitutions from tyrosine to phenylalanine and phenylalanine to methionine, respectively, impact susceptibility to fluconazole without affecting either posaconazole or itraconazole. Genome sequence analysis of R. oryzae, isolated from a fatal case of mucormycosis, revealed evidence of an ancestral whole-genome duplication and recent gene duplications. This genome expansion affected the genes involved in the cell wall, cell membrane and ergosterol biosynthetic pathway, including ERG11, coding the principal target of azole drugs (Ma et al., 2009). The increased number of copies could contribute to fungicide resistance (Figure 1B), as was shown in plant pathogenic fungi (Jones et al., 2014).
It has been repeatedly shown that the naturally occurring Y129F and the CYP51 gene are exclusively responsible for these susceptibility patterns (Caramalho et al., ; Macedo et al., 2018, 2021). Comparison of the paralogous pair CYP genes (CYP51 F1 and CYP51 F5) in different Rhizopus and Mucor species revealed that the Y129F mutation is conserved in all Mucorales. This substitution may change the structure of the protein resulting in the resistance to short-tailed azoles but it has no impact on binding the long-tailed azoles, like posaconazole (Caramalho et al., ).
Diagnosis of R. arrhizus and fungicide resistance
Identification of Mucorales species can be made with antibody-based techniques, like immunoelectrophoresis, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and immunodiffusion assays, or with visualization using computerized tomography (CT) scan or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT; Ribes et al., 2000) or with detecting Mucorales-specific T cells (Potenza et al., 2016). These methods can be used effectively in the more advanced stages of infection. For more specificity and the rapid diagnosis of the causal agent of mucormycosis, the PCR-based approaches have more potential. For the DNA-based identification Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP; Machouart et al., 2006), semi-nested PCR (Hammond et al., 2011), sequencing of the ITS region (Keisling et al., 2014), and qPCR (Scherer et al., 2018) are the frequently utilized methods. Besides the ITS region, the mucoralean-specific spore coating protein homolog gene, CotH, can be the target for PCR amplification and identification of R. arrhizus and other mucoralean species (Baldin et al., ). A commercially distributed, multiplex qPCR assay, MucorGenius (Pathonostics), can detect clinically relevant species.
The reproducibility and performance of different Mucorales qPCR assays were evaluated in an interlaboratory collaboration recently (Rocchi et al., 2021). The variability between laboratories was minimal and the concordance was excellent, only the observed Cq values varied between different qPCR platforms. Overall the use of qPCR based technics is highly recommended and encouraged for detecting Mucorales DNA, especially from serum (Rocchi et al., 2021). Mendonça et al. (2022) developed a qPCR multiplex method for detecting R. arrhizus and four Aspergillus species. The qPCR is based on SYBR Green and a melting curve analysis. It enables the simultaneous diagnosis of these invasive filamentous fungi either from culture or plasma, even when a small amount of DNA is available (Mendonça et al., 2022).
The detection methods of mucormycoses, including histopathology and direct microscopy were discussed in detail by Skiada et al. (2020).
For the evaluation of the susceptibility for the antifungal drugs Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) reference methods are currently available and recommended (Cornely et al., ; Dannaoui, ). Caramalho et al. () compared the efficacy of these broth microdilution assays, CLSI and EUCAST, with the commercially available Etest®. The former test is easy-to-use and time efficient but they found low levels of agreement of the results gained with Etest® and EUCAST for Mucorales (Caramalho et al., ).
Utilizing the automated BioCell-Tracer® (BCT) system enables the assessment of the effect of different antifungals in different concentrations directly on growing hyphae, even in the emergence stage (Taguchi et al., 1995; Fonseca et al., 2018). Fonseca et al. (2018) found that hyphae are more susceptible than conidia to AMB, itraconazole, and terbinafine based on the patterns using the BCT system.
Fusarium solani species complex
A complex of polyphagous pathogens and cryptic species
The F. solani species complex (FSSC) consists of several plant pathogens, endophytes, decomposers, symbionts of insects, and opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals (Schroers et al., 2016). FSSC is a phylogenetically and biologically complex group that is responsible for approximately two-thirds of all fusarioses cases worldwide (O'Donnell et al., 2008; Guarro, 2013; Batista et al., ; Bupha-Intr et al., ). Fusarioses are relatively rare compared to invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis, but FSSC can cause life-threatening opportunistic infections in immunocompromised and immunosuppressed patients (O'Donnell et al., 2020; Bupha-Intr et al., ). Invasive fusarioses, including bloodstream infections, have a high mortality due to the widespread antifungal resistance and frequently delayed diagnosis (Rajabzadeh et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2023). Nevertheless, FSSC can cause disease either on superficial or traumatized tissues in immunocompetent individuals, like keratitis, often associated with improper contact lens wear (Chang et al., ; Niu et al., 2020) and eumycetoma in patients with diabetes mellitus (Das et al., 2021).
Pathogenesis and virulence factors
The most common route of infection is through the respiratory tract, but could happen also by paronychia infection (onychomycosis) and trauma of the skin and eyes (keratitis; Batista et al., ; Bupha-Intr et al., ). The gastrointestinal tract represents an unlikely but slightly possible gateway to infection i.e., the consumption of food contaminated by Fusarium propagules (Nelson et al., 1994). Skin or nail infection can be the secondary source of inoculum prior to invasive infection, which can involve the bloodstream, bones, joints, etc. and more attention should be paid to it during physical investigations of the patients (Batista et al., ). The central nervous system can rarely be involved, e.g., eye pain, headache, and focal neurologic deficits (Vadhan et al., 2022).
Fusarium species are very effective pathogens due to the capability of dispersing long distances, sporulation in tissue and blood, production of mycotoxins and enzymes, and intrinsic multi-drug resistance (Bupha-Intr et al., ). Mycotoxins, like trichothecenes, inhibit humoral and cellular immunity, and protease enzymes produced by F. solani can cause corneal ulceration and destroy the epithelial cells in keratitis (Niu et al., 2020). Contact lens wearing is one of the risk factors and source of infection for fungal keratitis because Fusarium species can colonize the interior matrix of the lens and degrade the hydrophilic polymer components (Nelson et al., 1994).
Fusarium solani species due to keratinolytic activity are able to invade healthy nails and develop onychomycosis (Khan et al., 2019). In the infected nail tissue, through the adventitious sporulation, yeast-like, thick-walled budding structures are formed (Khan et al., 2019). This also illustrates that the morphology of the pathogen can alter depending on the invaded tissue, which should be considered during the identification of the pathogen (Sokolova et al., 2022).
Taxonomy
The name F. solani is widely used in plant pathology and clinics. Phylogenetic analyses have repeatedly shown that this taxon represents a complex group of cryptic species (Schroers et al., 2016). The F. solani species complex (FSSC) consists of three major evolutionary subgroups, and all clinically relevant species belong to one of those clades (O'Donnell et al., 2008; Geiser et al., 2021). Recently two main concepts conflicted with the phylogenetic position of F. solani species. Sandoval-Denis and Crous (2018) stated that the genus Fusarium is polyphyletic, and many clades are artificially arranged into it. They have suggested a new taxonomic approach based on four loci (nDNA ITS; elongation factor-1 alpha, EF-1α, nuclear Large Subunit rDNA, LSU; and RNA polymerase II 2nd largest subunit, RPB2) and morphological characters and introduced the generic name Neocosmospora for the FSSC complex, including several medically important taxa (Sandoval-Denis and Crous, 2018). On the contrary, O'Donnell et al. (2020) argued that FSSC had to be considered as belonging to the genus Fusarium and emphasized that splitting medically important FSSC species into different genera is unnecessary and misleading. They aware clinicians about the importance of proper identification because Fusarium species show a high level of resistance to several antifungals, and misidentification can cause fatal outcomes (O'Donnell et al., 2020).
Geiser et al. (2021) presented a robust phylogeny based on 19 protein-coding genes derived from whole-genome sequences. The results supported the monophyly of Fusarium, including the FSSC. The FSSC group was further examined based on 3-locus (RPB2, EF-1α, and nDNA ITS) phylogeny and the position within the genus Fusarium was confirmed (Geiser et al., 2021).
Prevalence of FSSC in the environment
The main source of inocula infecting humans are contaminated plant materials, soil, inhalation of polluted air, and as it was mentioned earlier, contaminated contact lens (Al-Hatmi et al., ). Short et al. (2011) found that hospital plumbing systems are also dangerous reservoirs for Fusarium inoculum. Comparing the diversity of clinical and plumbing drain-associated isolates revealed that Fusarium samples sharing the identical multilocus haplotypes are widespread and can be frequently isolated from both sources (Short et al., 2011). The results of another extensive survey of medical institutions also highlighted that the sewerage system and drain outlets can host Fusarium inoculum and droplet-mediated spread is a potential source of invasive fusarioses (Hino et al., 2020).
It has been repeatedly shown that FSSC strains isolated from plant materials are closely related to clinical species. Based on phylogenetic analysis, these strains group into the same clade as species causing human infection. For example, FSSC was responsible for crown rot and stem canker of pistachio (Crespo et al., ), wilt and root rot in both watermelon and melon crops (González et al., 2020), and citrus dry root rot on sour orange rootstock (Kunta et al., 2015). In addition, one of the causal agent of human fusarioses, Neocosmospora keratoplastica (F. keratoplasticum), member of the FSSC, was described for the first time as responsible for wilting and root rotting of Cucurbitaceae (González et al., 2020). They showed that this species is also widespread in agricultural areas, and most likely, its prevalence is underestimated.
Homa et al. (2018) studied clinical (from corneal scrapings) and environmental (from roots and soil) FSSC isolates from South India. The virulence of the strains was compared using Drosophila melanogaster model and they found that the pathogenicity was independent from the origin of the isolates.
James et al. (2022) analyzed 15 clinical (collected from nail, skin, corneal scrapings, and blood) and 15 environmental (including plant materials) FSSC isolates based on TEF1-a (translation elongation factor alpha, also known as EF1-α) and RPB2 Sequences. Three of the five clinical species examined in this work were also isolated from plants among other materials, e.g., F. keratoplasticum was isolated from nails, skin, and grass; F. falciforme was isolated from eyes, soil, tobacco, honeydew and straw compost. Emphasizing even further the possible environmental and agricultural origin of the clinically important species (James et al., 2022).
Mehl and Epstein (2007) were the first to prove the plant pathogenicity of human clinical FSSC isolates. During pathogenicity tests, zucchini fruits were inoculated with FSSC strains isolated from postharvest cucurbit fruits, human clinical, sewage, and hospital environment sources. There were no significant differences in pathogenicity between isolates from different sources. They proved the identity of the clinical and plant pathogenic isolates based on the multilocus phylogeny and sexual compatibility (Mehl and Epstein, 2007).
Meza-Menchaca et al. (2020) provided more details about the plant pathogenic characteristics of clinical Fusarium strains originating from keratitis samples. They performed in vitro assays with detached leaves, seedlings, and small pieces of nails as a human onychomycosis assay. In all experiments, Fusarium conidia germinated, colonized the plant and human tissues, and in the case of in vitro seedlings, deterred the growth. These in vitro experiments showed that F. solani strains, the causative agents of keratitis, are able to reinfect plants and humans (Meza-Menchaca et al., 2020).
Azole antifungal susceptibility and resistance mechanisms
The mortality among patients suffering from fusariosis is undoubtedly high because of the resistance (both intrinsic and secondary resistance) to several antifungals, especially, if the central nervous system is involved (Garcia et al., 2015). Fusarial species show different levels of resistance to different antifungals, e.g., resistance to FLC and ITC is widespread, while VRC and POS show some activity (Al-Hatmi et al., ). Often it is the combination of different antifungals that makes the treatment effective, like a combination of VRC with AMB (Ruíz-Cendoya et al., 2008) or with micafungin (Heyn et al., 2005) or natamycin with terbinafine (Homa et al., 2013).
The recommended antifungal treatment for invasive fusarioses as a first-line therapy is lipid formulation of AMB or VRC (Bupha-Intr et al., ). The combination therapy with VRC and AMB is moderately recommended by Bupha-Intr et al. (). Salvage therapy with POS is also moderately recommended and only when the isolate's susceptibility is determined, and the suitable formulation is available. In the case of endophthalmitis caused by Fusarium species, systemic and intravitreal antifungal agents are needed. Since VRC has a good capability to penetrate the eye, the use of VRC is recommended over AMB (Bupha-Intr et al., ).
Until recently, the exact mechanisms of resistance were not fully understood. The overinduction the CYP51A gene (Figure 1B) was observed after exposure to VRC and other azoles, including the agricultural fungicide, tebuconazole (D'agostino et al., ). James et al. (2021) showed that ABC1 ortholog transporters (Figure 1B) contribute to the azole resistance phenotypes in F. keratoplasticum and F. petroliphilum, the two most frequently isolated members of FSSC in the clinic. The same research group reported (James et al., 2020) a 23 bp length deletion in the CYP51A promoter accompanied by high VRC MIC values. They studied isolates from clinical and environmental samples, the former originated from nail, skin, corneal scraping, and blood, and the latter were collected from soil and plant debris. The existence of promoter deletion and VRC resistance were both found either in clinical or environmental samples. They suggested that this promoter deletion can be used as a molecular marker of VRC resistance (James et al., 2020).
Recently, the possible role of SNPs were studied investigating the mutations in Cyp51 protein sequences in clinical and environmental FSSC strains (Vermeulen et al., 2022). The susceptibility to azoles and MIC values of these strains were determined using the CLSI method. The MIC values were high for all antifungals for all strains but presented a broad range for VRC and isavuconazole. Comparing the protein sequences with the sequences of resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains revealed that the mutations at positions 170, 218, 253, and 422 decrease the susceptibility of these FSSC fungi to azoles. These amino acid changes might influence the protein structure, ligand binding, and locking of the protein against the membrane (Vermeulen et al., 2022).
Another possible mode of fungicide resistance in FSSC, without alteration of the Cyp51 protein, is biofilm formation. Córdova-Alcántara et al. () define biofilms as a complex of surface-associated microbial populations surrounded by a protective extracellular matrix (Córdova-Alcántara et al., ). FSSC biofilm can increase the tolerance to ultraviolet light and decrease the susceptibility to different antifungals, including VRC and AMB. The matrix of biofilms serve as physical barrier against chemical and biological substances and influences the activation of efflux pumps and the sterol content of the membrane (Córdova-Alcántara et al., ).
Diagnostics of FSSC and fungicide resistance
As with other species, accurate species identification is crucial for the selection of appropriate treatments (Al-Hatmi et al., ). The sampling procedure is also critical because coinfection of fusarial species is possible; thus, examination of single strains should not be enough (Guarro, 2013).
In vivo confocal microscopy is an important diagnostic tool for fungal keratitis, which can be used to examine hyphae directly in the cornea (Niu et al., 2020). This method enables the observation and early detection of depth fungal infection and allows for starting appropriate treatment in time (Niu et al., 2020; Sourlis et al., 2022). Besides of the outstanding utility of confocal microscopy, it needs an expensive tool and an experienced user for the operation (Niu et al., 2020).
Identifying the species based on morphological features is challenging because of the overlapping characteristics of different species and members of the same complex (Al-Hatmi et al., ). Therefore, proteomic-, or DNA-based methods should be involved for the reproducibility and reliability. The matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight (MALDI–TOF) analysis, a proteomic-based strategy, is a mass spectral analysis using a database for the identification. The method gives results within 1 h but has the disadvantage that it cannot identify species that are missing from the database (Marinach-Patrice et al., 2009).
Homa et al. (2013) developed a FSSC-specific molecular tool for rapid identification. They found a recognition site of EcoRI enzyme in the EF-1α sequences of members of FSSC. The enzymatic digestion of the PCR products of EF-1α resulted two of ca. 480 and 270 bp long fragments. This pattern was specific for all isolates belonging to FSSC. O'Donnell et al. (2007) developed another rapid method for the identification, a single-well diagnostic assay using flow cytometry and fluorescent microsphere technology. Allele-specific probes were designed based on RPB2 sequences, which allow the simultaneous identification of human pathogenic species and species complexes (O'Donnell et al., 2007).
Sequencing different loci is one of the most widespread and most effective identification methods. The universal fungal barcode, ITS region (Schoch et al., 2012) usually does not give enough information to distinguish Fusarium species. For the thorough identification the elongation factor, RNA polymerase II and beta-tubulin gene sequences are recommended (O'Donnell et al., 2013, 2015).
A broad range of Fusarium species can be detected with a probe-based real-time PCR assay. Springer et al. (2019) designed a 28S-based analysis utilizing a specific hydrolysis probe which can be applied for the diagnosis of fusarioses from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Another PCR-based method employing a special instrument with electrochemical detection system was developed by Zhang et al. (2020) for the identification of 15 fungal pathogens directly from blood cultures. The GenMark Dx ePlex instrument is able to perform all steps from processing the blood samples until the detection of the target DNA (Zhang et al., 2020). This method is suitable for simultaneous analysis of large numbers of samples, easy-to-use, and answers are obtained in a short time (Zhang et al., 2020), although a particular instrument is needed.
To detect fungicid-resistance of FSSC isolates, generally broth microdilution methods are applied (Al-Hatmi et al., ). For a detailed review of susceptibility testing methods applied for Fusarium species, see Al-Hatmi et al. (). To our knowledge, very few DNA-based molecular techniques are available, and only Sanger sequencing of CYP51 gene and its promoter region is used (James et al., 2020).
Mainly CLSI and EUCAST methods and commercially available rapid Etest® method are utilized for the antifungal susceptibility testing of FSSC; and all provide MIC data and are sufficient for optimizing the therapy of individual patients (e.g., Arendrup et al., ). However in some cases, a poor correlation was found between the in vitro susceptibility data and the outcome of the patient's treatment (Al-Hatmi et al., ). In the case of eumycetoma, the FSSC isolates showed high MIC values for several antifungals, like ITC. However, the patients responded well to ITC and recovered from the infection (Al-Hatmi et al., ).
In an MT2 microplate-based assay, the fungal mycelium is suspended in inoculating fluid, and then the MT2 microplate wells are filled with suspension (Frac et al., 2016). The method was tested on clinically and agriculturally (e.g., tebuconazol) used antifungals. Compared to the whole-plate approach, this process is more simple and cost-effective (Frac et al., 2016).
Blaize et al. () determined the antifungal susceptibility of 182 Fusarium isolates to AMB, VRC, POS, ISA, and terbinafine. They used EUCAST standardized methodology for all isolates and gradient concentration strip methods for 77 isolates to test the correlation between the two methods. They found that the correlation changed with the time of growth, e.g., in the case of POS a good correlation was obtained within first 24 h. However, for AMB the best correlation was gained after 72 h of growth. Overall the MIC values gained with the gradient strip method were lower than the EUCAST method. Furthermore, for voriconazole, the correlation coefficients were lower regardless of the growth period (Blaize et al., ).
A malignant keratitis case caused by a highly-resistant F. solani strain highlights the importance of proper detection, identification, and antifungal susceptibility testing (Schrecker et al., 2021). The causal agent was identified by morphology, ITS and TEF sequences as F. tonkinense belonging to the F. solani species complex. The isolate showed high MIC values for several antifungals except for natamycin. The treatment included topical natamycin and polyhexamethylene biguanide, systemic VRC, terbinafine, and intravitreal injections of VRC and AMB. The patient underwent two keratoplasty, and at the end, the vitreous body also became affected, and the endophthalmitis was rapidly progressing. After several months of treatment failure, the eye was enucleated (Schrecker et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the failure could be explained by the biofilm formation by the fungus. The hyphae adhere to laminins, fibronectins and collagens on the cornea and create the biofilm that protects the colony from antifungals. When the removed eye was examined fungal elements were not detectable. The authors hypothesized that the antifungal treatment finally eliminated the causative agent, and the immune response overreaction resulted in acute necrotizing inflammation (Schrecker et al., 2021).
Bloodstream infection represents minority, only the 1% of all Fusarium infections (Thomas et al., 2020), although the high mortality highlights its importance (Rajabzadeh et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2023). Especially in immunocompromised patients, a broad-spectrum antifungal agent and combination therapy with systemic antifungals are recommended (Rajabzadeh et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2023).
Curvularia lunata
A neglected trans-kingdom pathogen
Eumycetoma was declared as a neglected tropical disease by the WHO, present mainly in the tropical and subtropical regions (known also as the “Mycetoma Belt”) and sporadically found in other countries (Zijlstra et al., 2016). Several species are proven as agents of eumycetoma, which are now included in the high priority group on the FPPL. This granulomatous infection affects mainly the skin and subcutaneous tissue, sometimes with bone involvement (Agarwal et al., ). Usually, the lower extremities are involved; patients are typically farmers and people working barefoot on agricultural fields (Zijlstra et al., 2016). Presumably, the gateway of infection is a traumatic injury reaching subcutaneous layers, like a thorn prick (Santona et al., 2021) or the respiratory system (Skovrlj et al., 2014).
Curvularia lunata is one of the eumycetoma causative agents infecting mammals and plants. Besides eumycetoma, it can cause several mycotic diseases like rhinosinusitis with orbital cellulitis (Narula et al., 2020) and keratitis (Niu et al., 2020), and it is one of the most frequent species involved in local and invasive phaeohyphomycoses (Revankar et al., 2017). It is a keratinophilic species, producing keratinases that enable the fungus to colonize the skin (Wang et al., 2023). As other dematiaceous fungi, there is melanin, a well-known virulence factor, in the cell wall of C. lunata to avoid the host immune system (Skovrlj et al., 2014).
As a plant pathogen, C. lunata causes early blight disease of tomato (Abdelfatah et al., ), leaf spot of corn (Manzar et al., 2022), postharvest fruit rot of banana (Khan and Javaid, 2020), rice seedling rot disease (Limtong et al., 2020), and foliar necrotic spots of Andropogon grass (Santos et al., 2018) and Brassica rapa (Wonglom et al., 2018).
Identification and diagnosis
Identification of plant pathogen C. lunata strains is based mainly on ITS (Abdelfatah et al., ), Ras-related (Clg2p) gene (Hou et al., 2013), TEF1 and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase sequences (Garcia-Aroca et al., 2018). Culture characteristics, morphology and conidiation pattern are also frequently used for identification in plant pathology and clinics (Dubey et al., 2019; Khan and Javaid, 2020), and a next generation sequencing based approach has been published recently (Santona et al., 2022). Detailed information on detection of eumycetoma causing agents were published recently (Hao et al., 2022; Husain et al., 2022).
Treatment and antifungal susceptibility
Limited knowledge is available about the susceptibility and resistance of eumycetoma causing agents, and the lack of available CLSI criteria for C. lunata often leads to delayed and prolonged treatment (Dubey et al., 2019; Al-Odaini et al., ). The primary management of eumycetoma are surgical debridement along with systemic antifungals (Agarwal et al., ).
Different antifungal agents have very diverse effects on C. lunata. Based on checkerboard broth microdilution method VRC was the most effective, while terbinafine, AMB, ITC and ketoconazole had moderate activity, and FLC was the least efficient antifungal agent (Al-Odaini et al., ). Agarwal et al. () reported that terbinafine is effective only in combination with ITC; VRC and POS have both good in vitro activity, while echinocandins and AMB have poor in vitro outcome. In an other in vitro study AMP, terbinafine and POS were the superior antifungals, the other azoles had only moderate in vitro activity against C. lunata (Revankar et al., 2017).
Depending on the method used for the evaluation of the in vitro activity of antifungals, different outcome on effectiveness was learned. Zheng et al. (2019) compared the susceptibility of dematiaceous fungi to nine antifungal agents using Sensititre YeastOne® colorimetric antifungal panels and the CLSI M38-A2 reference broth microdilution method. For most common antifungals (e.g., AMB, VRC, ITC, FLC, and POS) the agreement between the two methods was high, while for echinocandins (e.g., caspofungin) was very variable among different species, and for C. lunata there was a 60-fold difference between the MIC values. They concluded that the YeastOne® method has the advantages of simplicity and shortening the test time, but the color changing, which indicates the MIC values, was ambiguous if echinocandins are tested. The same research group (Zheng et al., 2020) tested azoles on 84 clinical isolates of dematiaceous fungi, including C. lunata, and they found that ravuconazole and ISA are the superior antifungals for inhibition of the fungal infection.
Only AMB was given as antifungal treatment to a 69-year-old male heart transplant recipient who had painful skin lesions, multiple deep browns, cutaneous nodules and nodes, and the lesions disseminated to the whole arm (Tessari et al., 2003). One week before the first symptoms he had got a splinter during gardening. Hyperchromic maculopapular skin lesions spread on the whole skin surface and to the oral mucosa soon after the first antifungal treatment. The causal agent was identified as C. lunata. The infection got worse: a disseminated phaeohyphomycosis developed involving the skin, mouth, esophagus and the upper lobe of the right lung. The patient's condition worsened rapidly, and he passed away in a few days. The massive immunosuppression with strong drugs and delay in the diagnosis contributed to the fatal outcome of this case (Tessari et al., 2003).
A 66-year-old diabetic patient performed a rapidly growing lesion on her face soon after harvesting corn (Wang et al., 2023). Interestingly she was not treated with antifungal agents only with surgery combined with photodynamic therapy and 5-aminolevulinic acid. The patient completely recovered within a short time (Wang et al., 2023).
An immunocompetent but heavy cannabis- and alcohol-consuming 33-year-old patient was diagnosed with Curvularia infection in his brainstem. He suffered from headaches, nausea, vomiting, and a recent weight loss (Skovrlj et al., 2014). First, a lesion was found with MRI within the right medulla, and then a CT scan revealed a lesion in the left lung. During an open biopsy, an encapsulated lesion was found tightened to the brainstem. The microbiological examination revealed the Curvularia infection and an antifungal treatment with voriconazole, flucytosine, and liposomal amphotericin B was started. Despite treatment, the patient's condition worsened and he needed another surgery. After the surgical debridement and treatment with voriconazole, the patient recovered from the infection (Skovrlj et al., 2014).
As far, we know there is no information on the antifungal resistance mechanisms in C. lunata.
Conclusions and future remarks
Resistance to azoles is an increasingly serious problem in human medicine and agriculture, where azoles are the first-line fungicides of defense against pathogens (Gisi, 2014). Thus, the proper and accurate identification of the causal agents and detection of resistance are crucial in both fields. The incorrect identification can mislead the treatment in medicine and agriculture, i.e., delay patients' recovery, and it contributes to the spread of resistant pathogens and loss of efficacy of fungicides. Special attention should be given to the relevance of the resistant fungal pathogens in the environment, therefore in agriculture and forestry (e.g., wood preservation) the widespread usage of azoles enhance the abundance of resistant fungal populations. Since these resistant populations pose a threat in the human clinic, proper identification is undoubtedly necessary. Therefore, the development and improvement of molecular methods for identification and diagnostics are increasingly urgent.
For future developments, promising methods can be e.g., LAMP and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) based techniques. The former is rapid and low-cost, with great potential for early diagnosis (Yu et al., 2019). The ddPCR is also a quick method with high selectivity and the ability to quantify the pathogens (Lei et al., 2021).
Developing new and improved antifungal agents can enhance the outcome of human therapy (Mota Fernandes et al., 2021). Novel chemicals and improved azoles are around the corner, like olorofilm, which inhibits the pyrimidine biosynthesis in fungi and alters DNA synthesis, cell growth and division (Georgacopoulos et al., 2021). While luliconazole is a well-known antifungal, the interest toward it has been emerging recently. It is highly lipophilic, but proper nanocarriers can enhance its solubility and permeability that improve the therapeutic effect. In addition, luliconazole has a broad-spectrum antifungal activity making this fungicide a promising future antifungal agent in clinics (Dos Santos Porto et al., 2021).
We believe that the development of molecular methods is a crucial issue, because classical methods, like broth microdilution, may not be enough in all cases and should be complemented by other, DNA-based approaches. There is a need for methods to be used routinely, which are rapid, cost-effective and high-throughput if necessary.
An open question is whether fungi, which are virulent on both plants and humans, and become azole resistant in the clinics are able to infect plant material when released into the environment (Figure 1). Similarly, it is not known, whether there is any kind of transmission of fungal pathogens from human to plants, plant materials. It is generally considered as a one-way process, or only one direction is considered, studying the human infection. However, we should bear in mind, that these fungi are capable for the opposite way of the transmission, nevertheless, these cases might be sporadic compared to those when fungi with agricultural and environmental origin cause human infections. Since resistance to different antifungals is a continously emerging threat in all fields and multidisciplinar approach and collaboration is required across the One Health spectrum (World Health Organization, 2022).
Statements
Author contributions
AP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft. RB: Writing—review & editing. GK: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the grants of National Research, Development and Innovation Office (FK142971, ELTE Institutional Excellence Program 2020 - TKP2020-IKA-05, Diagnostics and Therapy 2) and AP by a scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbdelfatahH. A. S.SallamNMohamedM. S.BagyH. M. (2021). Curvularia lunata as new causal pathogen of tomato early blight disease in Egypt. Mol. Biol. Rep. 48, 3001–3006. 10.1007/s11033-021-06254-8
2
AgarwalP.JagatiA.RathodS. P.KalraK.PatelS.ChaudhariM. (2021). Clinical features of mycetoma and the appropriate treatment options. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 12:173. 10.2147/RRTM.S282266
3
Alastruey-IzquierdoA.CastelliM. V.CuestaI.MonzonA.Cuenca-EstrellaM.Rodriguez-TudelaJ. L. (2009). Activity of posaconazole and other antifungal agents against Mucorales strains identified by sequencing of internal transcribed spacers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 1686–1689. 10.1128/AAC.01467-08
4
Al-HatmiA. M.BonifazA.Tirado-SánchezA.MeisJ. F.De HoogG. S.AhmedS. A. (2017a). Fusarium species causing eumycetoma: report of two cases and comprehensive review of the literature. Mycoses60, 204–212. 10.1111/myc.12590
5
Al-HatmiA. M.Curfs-BreukerI.De HoogG. S.MeisJ. F.VerweijP. E. (2017b). Antifungal susceptibility testing of Fusarium: a practical approach. J. Fungi. 3:19. 10.3390/jof3020019
6
Al-HatmiA. M.MeisJ. F.De HoogG. S. (2016). Fusarium: molecular diversity and intrinsic drug resistance. PLoS Pathog. 12:e1005464. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005464
7
AlmyroudisN. G.SuttonD. A.FothergillA. W.RinaldiM. G.KusneS. (2007). In vitro susceptibilities of 217 clinical isolates of Zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 2587–2590. 10.1128/AAC.00452-07
8
Al-OdainiN.PanK. S.LiaoL. W.MoN. F.JiangZ. W.LiT. T.et al. (2022). Experimental phaeohyphomycosis of Curvularia lunata. J. Clin. Med. 11:5393. 10.3390/jcm11185393
9
Alvarez-MorenoC.LavergneR. A.HagenF.MorioF.MeisJ. F.Le PapeP. (2019). Fungicide-driven alterations in azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus are related to vegetable crops in Colombia, South America. Mycologia111, 217–224. 10.1080/00275514.2018.1557796
10
ArendrupM. C.FribergN.MaresM.KahlmeterG.MeletiadisJ.GuineaJ.et al. (2020). How to interpret MICs of antifungal compounds according to the revised clinical breakpoints v. 10.0 European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 26, 1464–1472. 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.007
11
Armstrong-JamesD.YoungsJ.BicanicT.AbdolrasouliA.DenningD. W.JohnsonE.et al. (2020). Confronting and mitigating the risk of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis. Eur. Respirat. Soc. 56:2554. 10.1183/13993003.02554-2020
12
BaldinC.SolimanS. S.JeonH. H.AlkhazrajiS.GebremariamT.GuY.et al. (2018). PCR-based approach targeting Mucorales-specific gene family for diagnosis of mucormycosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56, e00746–e00718. 10.1128/JCM.00746-18
13
BastosR. W.CarneiroH. C. S.OliveiraL. V. N.RochaK. M.FreitasG. J. C.CostaM. C.et al. (2018). Environmental triazole induces cross-resistance to clinical drugs and affects morphophysiology and virulence of Cryptococcus gattii and C. neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e01179–e01117. 10.1128/AAC.01179-17
14
BastosR. W.FreitasG. J. C.CarneiroH. C. S.OliveiraL. V. N.Gouveia-EufrasioL.SantosA. P. N.et al. (2019). From the environment to the host: how non-azole agrochemical exposure affects the antifungal susceptibility and virulence of Cryptococcus gattii. Sci. Total Environ. 681, 516–523. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.094
15
BastosR. W.RossatoL.GoldmanG. H.SantosD. A. (2021). Fungicide effects on human fungal pathogens: cross-resistance to medical drugs and beyond. PLoS Pathog. 17:e1010073. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010073
16
BatistaB. G.ChavesM. A. D.ReginattoP.SaraivaO. J.FuentefriaA. M. (2020). Human fusariosis: an emerging infection that is difficult to treat. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 53:13. 10.1590/0037-8682-0013-2020
17
BecherR.WirselS. G. (2012). Fungal cytochrome P450 sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) and azole resistance in plant and human pathogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 95, 825–840. 10.1007/s00253-012-4195-9
18
BensassonD.DicksJ.LudwigJ. M.BondC. J.EllistonA.RobertsI. N.et al. (2019). Diverse lineages of Candida albicans live on old oaks. Genetics211, 277–288. 10.1534/genetics.118.301482
19
BlaizeM.NormandA. C.ImbertS.Al-HatmiA. M.ChryssanthouE.CassaingS.et al. (2021). Antifungal susceptibility of 182 Fusarium species isolates from 20 European centers: comparison between EUCAST and gradient concentration strip methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 65:21. 10.1128/AAC.01495-21
20
BormanA. M.FraserM.PattersonZ.PalmerM. D.JohnsonE. M. (2021). In vitro antifungal drug resistance profiles of clinically relevant members of the Mucorales (Mucoromycota) especially with the newer triazoles. J. Fungi. 7:271. 10.3390/jof7040271
21
BrunoM.DewiI. M.MatzarakiV.Ter HorstR.PekmezovicM.RöslerB.et al. (2021). Comparative host transcriptome in response to pathogenic fungi identifies common and species-specific transcriptional antifungal host response pathways. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 647–663. 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.036
22
BuilJ. B.HareR. K.ZwaanB. J.ArendrupM. C.MelchersW. J.VerweijP. E. (2019). The fading boundaries between patient and environmental routes of triazole resistance selection in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 15:e1007858. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007858
23
Bupha-IntrO.ButtersC.ReynoldsG.KennedyK.MeyerW.PatilS.et al. (2021). Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal disease due to moulds other than Aspergillus in the haematology/oncology setting, 2021. Intern. Med. J. 51, 177–219. 10.1111/imj.15592
24
CaramalhoR.MaurerE.BinderU.AraújoR.DolatabadiS.Lass-FlörlC.et al. (2015). Etest cannot be recommended for in vitro susceptibility testing of Mucorales. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 3663–3665. 10.1128/AAC.00004-15
25
CaramalhoR.TyndallJ. D.MonkB. C.LarentisT.Lass-FlörlC.LacknerM. (2017). Intrinsic short-tailed azole resistance in mucormycetes is due to an evolutionary conserved aminoacid substitution of the lanosterol 14α-demethylase. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10. 10.1038/s41598-017-16123-9
26
Castelo-BrancoD.LockhartS. R.ChenY. C.SantosD. A.HagenF.HawkinsN. J.et al. (2022). Collateral consequences of agricultural fungicides on pathogenic yeasts: a One Health perspective to tackle azole resistance. Mycoses65, 303–311. 10.1111/myc.13404
27
Celia-SanchezB. N.MangumB.BrewerM.MomanyM. (2022). Analysis of Cyp51 protein sequences shows 4 major Cyp51 gene family groups across fungi. G312:jkac249. 10.1093/g3journal/jkac249
28
ChangD. C.GrantG. B.O'donnellK.WannemuehlerK. A.Noble-WangJ.RaoC. Y.et al. (2006). Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. J. Am. Med. Assoc.296, 953–963. 10.1001/jama.296.8.953
29
ChauA. S.ChenG.McnicholasP. M.MannP. A. (2006). Molecular basis for enhanced activity of posaconazole against Absidia corymbifera and Rhizopus oryzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 3917–3919. 10.1128/AAC.00747-06
30
ChenM.WangY.LiY.HongN.ZhuX.PanW.et al. (2021). Genotypic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans from the Yangtze River Delta region of East China. Med. Mycol. 59, 653–663. 10.1093/mmy/myaa096
31
ChenS.HuM.SchnabelG.YangD.YanX.YuanH. (2020). Paralogous CYP51 genes of Colletotrichum spp. mediate differential sensitivity to sterol demethylation inhibitors. Phytopathology110, 615–625. 10.1094/PHYTO-10-19-0385-R
32
ChibucosM. C.SolimanS.GebremariamT.LeeH.DaughertyS.OrvisJ.et al. (2016). An integrated genomic and transcriptomic survey of mucormycosis-causing fungi. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–11. 10.1038/ncomms12218
33
ChikleyA.Ben-AmiR.KontoyiannisD. P. (2019). Mucormycosis of the central nervous system. J. Fungi. 5:59. 10.3390/jof5030059
34
ChoudharyN. K.JainA. K.SoniR.GahlotN. (2021). Mucormycosis: a deadly black fungus infection among COVID-19 patients in India. Clin. Epidemiology Glob. Health12:100900. 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100900
35
CogliatiM.D'amicisR.ZaniA.MontagnaM. T.CaggianoG.De GiglioO.et al. (2016). Environmental distribution of Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii around the Mediterranean basin. FEMS Yeast Res. 16, fow045.
36
Córdova-AlcántaraI. M.Venegas-CortésD. L.Martínez-RiveraM. Á.PérezN. O.Rodriguez-TovarA. V. (2019). Biofilm characterization of Fusarium solani keratitis isolate: increased resistance to antifungals and UV light. J. Microbiol. 57, 485–497. 10.1007/s12275-019-8637-2
37
CornelyO.Arikan-AkdagliS.DannaouiE.GrollA.LagrouK.ChakrabartiA.et al. (2014). ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis 2013. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, 5–26. 10.1111/1469-0691.12371
38
CornelyO. A.Alastruey-IzquierdoA.ArenzD.ChenS. C.DannaouiE.HochheggerB.et al. (2019). Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, e405–e421. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30312-3
39
CrespoM.LawrenceD. P.NouriM. T.DollD. A.TrouillasF. P. (2019). Characterization of Fusarium and Neocosmospora species associated with crown rot and stem canker of pistachio rootstocks in California. Plant Dis. 103, 1931–1939. 10.1094/PDIS-11-18-2012-RE
40
D'agostinoM.LemmetT.DufayC.LucA.FrippiatJ. P.MachouartM.et al. (2018). Overinduction of CYP51A gene after exposure to azole antifungals provides a first clue to resistance mechanism in Fusarium solani species complex. Microb. Drug Resist. 24, 768–773. 10.1089/mdr.2017.0311
41
DamP.CardosoM. H.MandalS.FrancoO. L.SagirogluP.PolatO. A.et al. (2023). Surge of mucormycosis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 52:102557. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102557
42
DannaouiE. (2017). Antifungal resistance in mucorales. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents50, 617–621. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.08.010
43
DannaouiE.MeletiadisJ.MoutonJ. W.MeisJ. F.VerweijP. E. (2003). In vitro susceptibilities of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51, 45–52. 10.1093/jac/dkg020
44
DasL.DahiyaD.GuptaK.PrakashM.MalhotraB.RastogiA.et al. (2021). Eumycetoma of the foot due to Fusarium solani in a person with diabetes mellitus: report of a case and review of literature. Mycopathologia186, 277–288. 10.1007/s11046-020-00524-y
45
DolatabadiS.De HoogG. S.MeisJ. F.WaltherG. (2014). Species boundaries and nomenclature of Rhizopus arrhizus (syn. R. oryzae). Mycoses57, 108–127. 10.1111/myc.12228
46
Dos Santos PortoD.BajerskiL.Donadel MalesuikM.Soldateli PaimC. (2021). A review of characteristics, properties, application of nanocarriers and analytical methods of Luliconazole. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2021, 1–8. 10.1080/10408347.2021.1926219
47
DubeyN.CapoorM.HasanA.GuptaA.RameshV.SharmaS.et al. (2019). Epidemiological profile and spectrum of neglected tropical disease eumycetoma from Delhi, North India. Epidemiol. Infect. 147:66. 10.1017/S0950268819001766
48
FanJ.UrbanM.ParkerJ. E.BrewerH. C.KellyS. L.Hammond-KosackK. E.et al. (2013). Characterization of the sterol 14α-demethylases of Fusarium graminearum identifies a novel genus-specific CYP 51 function. New Phytol. 198, 821–835. 10.1111/nph.12193
49
FonsecaA. C. S.Teixeira-LoyolaA. B. A.LyraL.BussoA. F.MuraosaY.TaguchiH.et al. (2018). Rhizopus oryzae retro-orbital abscess: comparison of spores and hyphae antifungal susceptibility and clinical outcome. Open J. Med. Microbiol. 8, 1–11. 10.4236/ojmm.2018.81001
50
FracM.GrytaA.OszustK.KotowiczN. (2016). Fast and accurate microplate method (Biolog MT2) for detection of Fusarium fungicides resistance/sensitivity. Front. Microbiol. 7:489. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00489
51
GarciaR. R.MinZ.NarasimhanS.BhanotN. (2015). Fusarium brain abscess: case report and literature review. Mycoses58, 22–26. 10.1111/myc.12271
52
Garcia-ArocaT.DoyleV.SinghR.PriceT.CollinsK. (2018). First report of Curvularia leaf spot of corn, caused by Curvularia lunata, in the United States. Plant Health Prog. 19, 140–142. 10.1094/PHP-02-18-0008-BR
53
GauthierG. M.KellerN. P. (2013). Crossover fungal pathogens: the biology and pathogenesis of fungi capable of crossing kingdoms to infect plants and humans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 61, 146–157. 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.08.016
54
GeiserD. M.Al-HatmiA. M.AokiT.ArieT.BalmasV.BarnesI.et al. (2021). Phylogenomic analysis of a 55.1-kb 19-gene dataset resolves a monophyletic Fusarium that includes the Fusarium solani species complex. Phytopathology111, 1064–1079. 10.1094/PHYTO-08-20-0330-LE
55
GeorgacopoulosO.NunnallyN. S.RansomE. M.LawD.BirchM.LockhartS. R.et al. (2021). In vitro activity of novel antifungal olorofim against filamentous fungi and comparison to eight other antifungal agents. J. Fungi. 7:378. 10.3390/jof7050378
56
GhoshB.RayR. R. (2011). Current commercial perspective of Rhizopus oryzae: a review. J. Appl. Sci.11, 2470–2486. 10.3923/jas.2011.2470.2486
57
GisiU. (2014). Assessment of selection and resistance risk for demethylation inhibitor fungicides in Aspergillus fumigatus in agriculture and medicine: a critical review. Pest Manag. Sci. 70, 352–364. 10.1002/ps.3664
58
GnaneshB.TejaswiA.ArunakumarG.SupriyaM.ManojkumarH.TewaryP. (2021). Molecular phylogeny, identification and pathogenicity of Rhizopus oryzae associated with root rot of mulberry in India. J. Appl. Microbiol. 131, 360–374. 10.1111/jam.14959
59
GonzálezV.García-MartínezS.Flores-LeónA.RuizJ.PicóBGarcés-ClaverA. (2020). Neocosmospora keratoplastica, a relevant human fusarial pathogen is found to be associated with wilt and root rot of muskmelon and watermelon crops in Spain: epidemiological and molecular evidences. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 156, 1189–1196. 10.1007/s10658-020-01931-z
60
GryganskyiA. P.LeeS. C.LitvintsevaA. P.SmithM. E.BonitoG.PorterT. M.et al. (2010). Structure, function, and phylogeny of the mating locus in the Rhizopus oryzae complex. PLoS ONE5:e15273. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015273
61
GuarroJ. (2013). Fusariosis, a complex infection caused by a high diversity of fungal species refractory to treatment. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 32, 1491–1500. 10.1007/s10096-013-1924-7
62
HaddoudiI.MhadhbiH.GargouriM.BarhoumiF.RomdhaneS. B.MrabetM. (2021). Occurrence of fungal diseases in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under salt and drought stress. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 159, 385–398. 10.1007/s10658-020-02169-5
63
HammondS. P.BialekR.MilnerD. A.PetschniggE. M.BadenL. R.MartyF. M. (2011). Molecular methods to improve diagnosis and identification of mucormycosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, 2151–2153. 10.1128/JCM.00256-11
64
HandelmanM.MeirZ.ScottJ.ShadkchanY.LiuW.Ben-AmiR.et al. (2021). Point mutation or overexpression of Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51B, encoding lanosterol 14a-sterol demethylase, leads to triazole resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.65:e0125221. 10.1128/AAC.01252-21
65
HaoX.CognettiM.Burch-SmithR.MejiaE. O. S.MirkinG. (2022). Mycetoma: development of diagnosis and treatment. J. Fungi. 8:743. 10.3390/jof8070743
66
HawkinsN. J.CoolsH. J.SierotzkiH.ShawM. W.KnoggeW.KellyS. L.et al. (2014). Paralog re-emergence: a novel, historically contingent mechanism in the evolution of antimicrobial resistance. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1793–1802. 10.1093/molbev/msu134
67
Hermida-AlavaK.Brito DevotoT.SautuaF.GordóM.ScandianiM.FormentoN.et al. (2021). Antifungal susceptibility profile and molecular identification of Cyp51C mutations in clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus flavus from Argentina. Mycoses64, 95–101. 10.1111/myc.13193
68
HeynK.TredupA.SalvenmoserS.MüLlerF. M. C. (2005). Effect of voriconazole combined with micafungin against Candida, Aspergillus, and Scedosporium spp. and Fusarium solani. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 5157–5159. 10.1128/AAC.49.12.5157-5159.2005
69
HinoY.MuraosaY.OguchiM.YahiroM.YaritaK.WatanabeA.et al. (2020). Drain outlets in patient rooms as sources for invasive fusariosis: an analysis of patients with haematological disorders. J. Hosp. Infect. 105, 518–526. 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.029
70
HomaM.GalgóczyL.ManikandanP.NarendranV.SinkaR.CserneticsÁ.et al. (2018). South Indian isolates of the Fusarium solani species complex from clinical and environmental samples: identification, antifungal susceptibilities, and virulence. Front. Microbiol. 9:1052. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01052
71
HomaM.ShobanaC. S.SinghY. R.ManikandanP.SelvamK. P.KredicsL.et al. (2013). Fusarium keratitis in South India: causative agents, their antifungal susceptibilities and a rapid identification method for the Fusarium solani species complex. Mycoses56, 501–511. 10.1111/myc.12062
72
HouJ.MaB.ZuoY.GuoL.GaoS.WangY.et al. (2013). Rapid and sensitive detection of Curvularia lunata associated with maize leaf spot based on its Clg2p gene using semi-nested PCR. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 56, 245–250. 10.1111/lam.12040
73
HuF.WangC.WangP.ZhangL.JiangQ.Al-HatmiA. M.et al. (2021). First case of subcutaneous mycoses caused by Dirkmeia churashimaensis and a literature review of human ustilaginales infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11:711768. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.711768
74
HuangL.YuanY.LiaoX.LiQ.LongJ.LinD.et al. (2023). Disseminated Fusarium solani infection in a child with acute lymphocytic leukemia: a case report and literature review. Med. Microecol.18:100093. 10.1016/j.medmic.2023.100093
75
HusainU.VermaP.SuviryaS.PriyadarshiK.GuptaP. (2022). An overview of mycetoma and its diagnostic dilemma: time to move on to advanced techniques. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol.2021, 1–6. 10.25259/IJDVL_615_2021
76
IbrahimA. S.SpellbergB.WalshT. J.KontoyiannisD. P. (2012). Pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54, S16–S22. 10.1093/cid/cir865
77
IdnurmA.BahnY.-S.NielsenK.LinX.FraserJ. A.HeitmanJ. (2005). Deciphering the model pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 753–764. 10.1038/nrmicro1245
78
IshiiH.BrysonP. K.KayamoriM.MiyamotoT.YamaokaY.SchnabelG. (2021). Cross-resistance to the new fungicide mefentrifluconazole in DMI-resistant fungal pathogens. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 171:104737. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104737
79
JamesJ. E.LampingE.SanthanamJ.CannonR. D. (2021). PDR transporter ABC1 Is involved in the innate azole resistance of the human fungal pathogen Fusarium keratoplasticum. Front. Microbiol. 12:1198. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.673206
80
JamesJ. E.LampingE.SanthanamJ.MilneT. J.Abd RazakM. F.ZakariaL.et al. (2020). A 23 bp cyp51A promoter deletion associated with voriconazole resistance in clinical and environmental isolates of Neocosmospora keratoplastica. Front. Microbiol. 11:272. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00272
81
JamesJ. E.SanthanamJ.ZakariaL.Mamat RusliN.Abu BakarM.SuetrongS.et al. (2022). Morphology, phenotype, and molecular identification of clinical and environmental Fusarium solani species complex isolates from Malaysia. J. Fungi. 8:845. 10.3390/jof8080845
82
JeanvoineA.RocchiS.RebouxG.CriniN.CriniG.MillonL. (2017). Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in sawmills of Eastern France. J. Appl. Microbiol. 123, 172–184. 10.1111/jam.13488
83
JeongW.KeighleyC.WolfeR.LeeW. L.SlavinM.KongD.et al. (2019). The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25, 26–34. 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.011
84
JonesL.RiazS.Morales-CruzA.AmrineK. C.McguireB.GublerW. D.et al. (2014). Adaptive genomic structural variation in the grape powdery mildew pathogen, Erysiphe necator. BMC Genom.15, 1–18. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1081
85
JørgensenL. N.HeickT. M. (2021). Azole use in agriculture, horticulture, and wood preservation-is it indispensable?Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 806:730297. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.730297
86
KeislingM. P.SeemungalI. A.MercadoD. I.VothS.MichaelA.GomezB. L.et al. (2014). Rhinocerebral mucormycosis in a patient with pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: PCR identifying Rhizopus oryzae from culture-negative tissue specimens. JMM Case Rep.1:e000984. 10.1099/jmmcr.0.000984
87
KhanI. H.JavaidA. (2020). First report of Curvularia lunata causing postharvest fruit rot of banana in Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 24, 1621–1624. 10.17957/IJAB/15.1603
88
KhanZ.AhmadS.AlfouzanW.JosephL.VargheseS. (2019). Demonstration of adventitious sporulation in Fusarium petroliphilum onychomycosis. Mycopathologia184, 303–308. 10.1007/s11046-019-0318-5
89
KhokharI.MukhtarI.WangJ.JiaY.YanY. (2019). A report of Rhizopus oryzae causing postharvest soft rot of apple fruit in China. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes14, 1–4. 10.1007/s13314-019-0337-6
90
KoehlerP.BassettiM.ChakrabartiA.ChenS. C.ColomboA. L.HoeniglM.et al. (2021). Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, e149–e162. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30847-1
91
KuntaM.SalasB.GonzalesM.Da GraçaJ. V. (2015). First report on citrus dry rot in sour orange rootstock in Texas. J. Citrus Pathol. 2:1027974. 10.5070/C421027974
92
LeiS.ChenS.ZhongQ. (2021). Digital PCR for accurate quantification of pathogens: principles, applications, challenges and future prospects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 184, 750–759. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.132
93
LimtongS.IntoP.AttaratP. (2020). Biocontrol of rice seedling rot disease caused by Curvularia lunata and Helminthosporium oryzae by epiphytic yeasts from plant leaves. Microorganisms8:647. 10.3390/microorganisms8050647
94
MaL.-J.IbrahimA. S.SkoryC.GrabherrM. G.BurgerG.ButlerM.et al. (2009). Genomic analysis of the basal lineage fungus Rhizopus oryzae reveals a whole-genome duplication. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000549. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000549
95
MacedoD.LeonardelliF.CabezaM. S.GamarraS.Garcia-EffronG. (2021). The natural occurring Y129F polymorphism in Rhizopus oryzae (R. arrhizus) Cyp51Ap accounts for its intrinsic voriconazole resistance. Med. Mycol.59, 1202–1209. 10.1093/mmy/myab052
96
MacedoD.LeonardelliF.DudiukC.TheillL.CabezaM. S.GamarraS.et al. (2018). Molecular confirmation of the linkage between the Rhizopus oryzae CYP51A gene coding region and its intrinsic voriconazole and fluconazole resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e00224–e00218. 10.1128/AAC.00224-18
97
MachouartM.LarchéJ.BurtonK.CollombJ.MaurerP.CintratA.et al. (2006). Genetic identification of the main opportunistic Mucorales by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 805–810. 10.1128/JCM.44.3.805-810.2006
98
ManzarN.KashyapA. S.MauryaA.RajawatM. V. S.SharmaP. K.SrivastavaA. K.et al. (2022). Multi-gene phylogenetic approach for identification and diversity analysis of Bipolaris maydis and Curvularia lunata isolates causing foliar blight of Zea mays. J. Fungi. 8:802. 10.3390/jof8080802
99
Marinach-PatriceC.LethuillierA.MarlyA.BrossasJ.-Y.GeneJ.SymoensF.et al. (2009). Use of mass spectrometry to identify clinical Fusarium isolates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15, 634–642. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02758.x
100
MehlH. L.EpsteinL. (2007). Fusarium solani species complex isolates conspecific with Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae race 2 from naturally infected human and plant tissue and environmental sources are equally virulent on plants, grow at 37 C and are interfertile. Environ. Microbiol.9, 2189–2199. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01333.x
101
MeisJ. F.ChowdharyA.RhodesJ. L.FisherM. C.VerweijP. E. (2016). Clinical implications of globally emerging azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 371:20150460. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0460
102
MendonçaA.Carvalho-PereiraJ.Franco-DuarteR.SampaioP. (2022). Optimization of a quantitative PCR methodology for detection of Aspergillus spp. and Rhizopus arrhizus. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 26, 511–525. 10.1007/s40291-022-00595-1
103
Meza-MenchacaT.SinghR. K.Quiroz-ChávezJ.García-PérezL. M.Rodríguez-MoraN.Soto-LunaM.et al. (2020). First demonstration of clinical Fusarium strains causing cross-kingdom infections from humans to plants. Microorganisms8:947. 10.3390/microorganisms8060947
104
MoosaA.FarzandA.SahiS. T.KhanS. A.MalikA. U.GleasonM. L.et al. (2020). First report of post-harvest rot of Citrus reticulata cv. “Kinnow” caused by Rhizopus arrhizus in Pakistan. J. Plant Pathol. 102, 279–280. 10.1007/s42161-019-00414-3
105
MorioF. (2020). Dear medical mycologists, it is time to look outside the box. FEMS Yeast Res. 20:foz080. 10.1093/femsyr/foz080
106
Mota FernandesC.DasilvaD.HaranahalliK.MccarthyJ. B.MallamoJ.OjimaI.et al. (2021). The future of antifungal drug therapy: novel compounds and targets. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 65, e01719–e01720. 10.1128/AAC.01719-20
107
MousaviB.BotterelF.CostaJ.-M.ArnéP.GuillotJ.DannaouiE. (2019). Occurrence and species diversity of human-pathogenic Mucorales in commercial food-stuffs purchased in Paris area. Med. Mycol. 57, 739–744. 10.1093/mmy/myy121
108
MunckhofW.JonesR.TosoliniF.MarzecA.AngusP.GraysonM. (1993). Cure of Rhizopus sinusitis in a liver transplant recipient with liposomal amphotericin B. Clin. Infect. Dis. 16, 183–183. 10.1093/clinids/16.1.183
109
NarulaH.MeenaS.JhaS.KaisthaN.PathaniaM.GuptaP. (2020). Curvularia lunata causing orbital cellulitis in a diabetic patient: an old fungus in a new territory. Curr. Med. Mycol. 6:51. 10.18502/cmm.6.1.2510
110
NelsonP. E.DignaniM. C.AnaissieE. J. (1994). Taxonomy, biology, and clinical aspects of Fusarium species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7, 479–504. 10.1128/CMR.7.4.479
111
NiuL.LiuX.MaZ.YinY.SunL.YangL.et al. (2020). Fungal keratitis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and prevention. Microb. Pathog. 138:103802. 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103802
112
O'DonnellK.Al-HatmiA. M.AokiT.BrankovicsB.Cano-LiraJ. F.ColemanJ. J.et al. (2020). No to Neocosmospora: phylogenomic and practical reasons for continued inclusion of the Fusarium solani species complex in the genus Fusarium. mSphere5, e00810–e00820. 10.1128/mSphere.00810-20
113
O'DonnellK.RooneyA. P.ProctorR. H.BrownD. W.MccormickS. P.WardT. J.et al. (2013). Phylogenetic analyses of RPB1 and RPB2 support a middle Cretaceous origin for a clade comprising all agriculturally and medically important fusaria. Fungal Genet. Biol. 52, 20–31. 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.12.004
114
O'DonnellK.SarverB. A.BrandtM.ChangD. C.Noble-WangJ.ParkB. J.et al. (2007). Phylogenetic diversity and microsphere array-based genotyping of human pathogenic fusaria, including isolates from the multistate contact lens-associated US keratitis outbreaks of 2005 and 2006. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 2235–2248. 10.1128/JCM.00533-07
115
O'DonnellK.SuttonD. A.FothergillA.MccarthyD.RinaldiM. G.BrandtM. E.et al. (2008). Molecular phylogenetic diversity, multilocus haplotype nomenclature, and in vitro antifungal resistance within the Fusarium solani species complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 2477–2490. 10.1128/JCM.02371-07
116
O'DonnellK.WardT. J.RobertV. A.CrousP. W.GeiserD. M.KangS. (2015). DNA sequence-based identification of Fusarium: current status and future directions. Phytoparasitica43, 583–595. 10.1007/s12600-015-0484-z
117
OpulenteD. A.LangdonQ. K.BuhK. V.HaaseM. A.SylvesterK.MoriartyR. V.et al. (2019). Pathogenic budding yeasts isolated outside of clinical settings. FEMS Yeast Res. 19:foz032. 10.1093/femsyr/foz032
118
OrtonedaM.GuarroJ.MadridM. P.CaracuelZ.RonceroM. I. G.MayayoE.et al. (2004). Fusarium oxysporum as a multihost model for the genetic dissection of fungal virulence in plants and mammals. Infect. Immun. 72, 1760–1766. 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1760-1766.2004
119
OsaigbovoI. I.EkengB. E.DaviesA. A.OladeleR. O. (2023). Mucormycosis in Africa: epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Mycoses2023, 13581. 10.1111/myc.13581
120
PaganoL.CornelyO. A.BuscaA.CairaM.CesaroS.GasbarrinoC.et al. (2013). Combined antifungal approach for the treatment of invasive mucormycosis in patients with hematologic diseases: a report from the SEIFEM and FUNGISCOPE registries. Haematologica98:e127. 10.3324/haematol.2012.083063
121
PappasP. G.LionakisM. S.ArendrupM. C.Ostrosky-ZeichnerL.KullbergB. J. (2018). Invasive candidiasis. Nat. Rev. Dis. 4, 1–20. 10.1038/nrdp.2018.26
122
PfallerM. A.CarvalhaesC. G.DevriesS.HubandM. D.CastanheiraM. (2022). Elderly vs. nonelderly patients with invasive fungal infections: species distribution and antifungal resistance, SENTRY antifungal surveillance program 2017–2019. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 102:115627. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115627
123
PfallerM. A.CarvalhaesC. G.RhombergP.MesserS. A.CastanheiraM. (2021). Antifungal susceptibilities of opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens from the Asia and Western Pacific Region: data from the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program (2011–2019). J. Antibiot.74, 519–527. 10.1038/s41429-021-00431-4
124
PotenzaL.ValleriniD.BarozziP.RivaG.GilioliA.ForghieriF.et al. (2016). Mucorales-specific T cells in patients with hematologic malignancies. PLoS ONE11:e0149108. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149108
125
RabieN. B.AlthaqafiA. O. (2012). Rhizopus-associated soft tissue infection in an immunocompetent air-conditioning technician after a road traffic accident: a case report and review of the literature. J. Infect. Public Health. 5, 109–111. 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.10.002
126
RajabzadehA.ShokriD.AboutalebianS.MorovatiH.MohammadiA.SamaniR. E.et al. (2020). A fatal case of bloodstream infection by Fusarium solani in a patient with adrenocortical carcinoma from Isfahan, Iran. Int. J. Cancer Manag.13:98610. 10.5812/ijcm.98610
127
RaoV. U.ArakeriG.MadikeriG.ShahA.OeppenR. S.BrennanP. A. (2021). COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) in India: a formidable challenge. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 59, 1095–1098. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.06.013
128
RevankarS. G.BaddleyJ. W.ChenS. C. A.KauffmanC. A.SlavinM.VazquezJ. A.et al. (2017). “A mycoses study group international prospective study of phaeohyphomycosis: an analysis of 99 proven/probable cases,” in Proceedings of the Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2017 (Oxford: Oxford University Press US), ofx200.
129
RibesJ. A.Vanover-SamsC. L.BakerD. J. (2000). Zygomycetes in human disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13, 236–301. 10.1128/CMR.13.2.236
130
RichardsonM. (2009). The ecology of the Zygomycetes and its impact on environmental exposure. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15, 2–9. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02972.x
131
RocchiS.SchererE.MengoliC.AlanioA.BotterelF.BougnouxM.et al. (2021). Interlaboratory evaluation of Mucorales PCR assays for testing serum specimens: a study by the fungal PCR Initiative and the Modimucor study group. Med. Mycol. 59, 126–138. 10.1093/mmy/myaa036
132
RodenM. M.ZaoutisT. E.BuchananW. L.KnudsenT. A.SarkisovaT. A.SchaufeleR. L.et al. (2005). Epidemiology and outcome of zygomycosis: a review of 929 reported cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41, 634–653. 10.1086/432579
133
RoundtreeM. T.JuvvadiP. R.ShwabE. K.ColeD. C.SteinbachW. J. (2020). Aspergillus fumigatus Cyp51A and Cyp51B proteins are compensatory in function and localize differentially in response to antifungals and cell wall inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.64:20. 10.1128/AAC.00735-20
134
Ruíz-CendoyaM.MarinéMGuarroJ. (2008). Combined therapy in treatment of murine infection by Fusarium solani. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62, 543–546. 10.1093/jac/dkn215
135
Sandoval-DenisM.CrousP. (2018). Removing chaos from confusion: assigning names to common human and animal pathogens in Neocosmospora. Persoonia41, 109–129. 10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.06
136
SantonaA.MhmoudN. A.SiddigE. E.DeligiosM.FiammaM.BakhietS. M.et al. (2021). Metagenomics of black grains: new highlights in the understanding of eumycetoma. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 115, 307–314. 10.1093/trstmh/traa177
137
SantonaA.MhmoudN. A.SiddigE. E.DeligiosM.FiammaM.PagliettiB.et al. (2022). Metagenomic detection of eumycetoma causative agents from households of patients residing in two Sudanese endemic villages in White Nile State. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 16:e0010385. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010385
138
SantosP. R. R. D.LeãoE. U.AguiarR. W. D. S.MeloM. P. D.SantosG. R. D. (2018). Morphological and molecular characterization of Curvularia lunata pathogenic to andropogon grass. Bragantia77, 326–332. 10.1590/1678-4499.2017258
139
SchererE.IriartX.BellangerA. P.DupontD.GuitardJ.GabrielF.et al. (2018). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) detection of Mucorales DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid to diagnose pulmonary mucormycosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56, e00289–e00218. 10.1128/JCM.00289-18
140
SchochC. L.SeifertK. A.HuhndorfS.RobertV.SpougeJ. L.LevesqueC. A.et al. (2012). Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. 109, 6241–6246. 10.1073/pnas.1117018109
141
SchoustraS. E.DebetsA. J.RijsA. J.ZhangJ.SneldersE.LeendertseP. C.et al. (2019). Environmental hotspots for azole resistance selection of Aspergillus fumigatus, the Netherlands. Emerging Infect. Dis. 25:1347. 10.3201/eid2507.181625
142
SchreckerJ.SeitzB.BergerT.DaasL.Behrens-BaumannW.Auw-HädrichC.et al. (2021). Malignant keratitis caused by a highly-resistant strain of Fusarium tonkinense from the Fusarium solani complex. J. Fungi. 7:1093. 10.3390/jof7121093
143
SchroersH.-J.SamuelsG. J.ZhangN.ShortD. P.JubaJ.GeiserD. M. (2016). Epitypification of Fusisporium (Fusarium) solani and its assignment to a common phylogenetic species in the Fusarium solani species complex. Mycologia108, 806–819. 10.3852/15-255
144
SchwarzP.CornelyO. A.DannaouiE. (2019). Antifungal combinations in Mucorales: a microbiological perspective. Mycoses62, 746–760. 10.1111/myc.12909
145
ShihH. I.HuangY. T.WuC. J. (2022). Disease burden and demographic characteristics of mucormycosis: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan, 2006–2017. Mycoses65, 1001–1009. 10.1111/myc.13484
146
ShortD. P.O'donnellK.ZhangN.JubaJ. H.GeiserD. M. (2011). Widespread occurrence of diverse human pathogenic types of the fungus Fusarium detected in plumbing drains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, 4264–4272. 10.1128/JCM.05468-11
147
SkiadaA.PavleasI.Drogari-ApiranthitouM. (2020). Epidemiology and diagnosis of mucormycosis: an update. J. Fungi. 6, 265. 10.3390/jof6040265
148
SkovrljB.HaghighiM.SmethurstM. E.CaridiJ.BedersonJ. B. (2014). Curvularia abscess of the brainstem. World Neurosurg. 82, 241.e9–241.e13. 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.014
149
SneldersE.CampsS. M.KarawajczykA.SchaftenaarG.KemaG. H.Van Der LeeH. A.et al. (2012). Triazole fungicides can induce cross-resistance to medical triazoles in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE7:e31801. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031801
150
SokolovaG.BudynkovN.TselipanovaE.GlinushkinA. (2022). Species diversity in the Fusarium solani (Neocosmospora) complex and their pathogenicity for plants and humans. Proceedings of the Dokl. Biol. Sci.17, 416–427. 10.1134/S0012496622060217
151
SolimanS. S.BaldinC.GuY.SinghS.GebremariamT.SwidergallM.et al. (2021). Mucoricin is a ricin-like toxin that is critical for the pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 313–326. 10.1038/s41564-020-00837-0
152
SourlisC.SeitzB.RothM.HamonL.DaasL. (2022). Outcomes of severe fungal keratitis using in vivo confocal microscopy and early therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. Clin. Ophthalmolo.2022, 2245–2254. 10.2147/OPTH.S358709
153
SpringerJ.WaltherG.RickertsV.HamprechtA.WillingerB.TeschnerD.et al. (2019). Detection of Fusarium species in clinical specimens by probe-based real-time PCR. J. Fungi. 5:105. 10.3390/jof5040105
154
TaguchiH.MiyajiM.NishimuraK.XuM. L. (1995). Studies on the synergistic effect of amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine on the growth rate of single hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus by a biocell-tracer system. Mycoscience36, 341–344. 10.1007/BF02268610
155
TahiriG.LaxC.Cánovas-MárquezJ. T.Carrillo-MarínP.SanchisM.NavarroE.et al. (2023). Mucorales and mucormycosis: recent insights and future prospects. J. Fungi. 9:335. 10.3390/jof9030335
156
TakahashiJ. P. F.FelicianoL. M.SantosD. C. S.RamosS.OliveiraR. A.Attili-AngelisD.et al. (2020). Could fungicides lead to azole drug resistance in a cross-resistance manner among environmental Cryptococcus strains?Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 14, 9–14. 10.1007/s12281-020-00373-8
157
TessariG.ForniA.FerrettoR.SolbiatiM.FaggianG.MazzuccoA.et al. (2003). Lethal systemic dissemination from a cutaneous infection due to Curvularia lunata in a heart transplant recipient. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.17, 440–442. 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2003.00674.x
158
ThomasB.AudonneauN. C.MachouartM.DebourgogneA. (2020). Fusarium infections: epidemiological aspects over 10 years in a university hospital in France. J. Infect. Public Health. 13, 1089–1093. 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.007
159
VadhanJ.MeloA.ShoganJ.SinghV.CarrilloM. (2022). Fast and Fusariosis: a systematic review and case report of a rapidly fatal central nervous system infection. J. Emerg. Crit. Care Med2022, 1–7. 10.21037/jeccm-21-125
160
Van RhijnN.BromleyM.RichardsonM.BowyerP. (2021). CYP51 paralogue structure is associated with intrinsic azole resistance in fungi. mBio12:21. 10.1128/mBio.01945-21
161
VermeulenP.GruezA.BabinA.-L.FrippiatJ.-P.MachouartM.DebourgogneA. (2022). CYP51 mutations in the Fusarium solani species complex: first clue to understand the low susceptibility to azoles of the genus Fusarium. J. Fungi. 8:533. 10.3390/jof8050533
162
VerweijP. E.KemaG. H.ZwaanB.MelchersW. J. (2013). Triazole fungicides and the selection of resistance to medical triazoles in the opportunistic mould Aspergillus fumigatus. Pest Manag. Sci. 69, 165–170. 10.1002/ps.3390
163
VerweijP. E.LucasJ. A.ArendrupM. C.BowyerP.BrinkmannA. J.DenningD. W.et al. (2020). The one health problem of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: current insights and future research agenda. Fungal Biol. Rev. 34, 202–214. 10.1016/j.fbr.2020.10.003
164
VitaleR. G.De HoogG. S.SchwarzP.DannaouiE.DengS.MachouartM.et al. (2012). Antifungal susceptibility and phylogeny of opportunistic members of the order mucorales. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 66–75. 10.1128/JCM.06133-11
165
WaltherG.WagnerL.KurzaiO. (2019). Updates on the taxonomy of Mucorales with an emphasis on clinically important taxa. J. Fungi. 5:106. 10.3390/jof5040106
166
WangX.QuY.YangZ.ZhangT.FengY.LiD.et al. (2023). Surgery plus photodynamic therapy for a diabetic patient with cutaneous infectious granuloma caused by Curvularia lunata. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 41:103253. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103253
167
WangY.JieY. L. X.-C. M.LaiT.-F.ZhouT. (2015). Inhibitory effects of five antifungal substances on development of postharvest pathogen Rhizopus oryzae. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 23, 107–117. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2015.01.012
168
WickesB. L. (2013). Rhizopus oryzae: genetic secrets of an emerging human pathogen. Genom. Soil Plant Assoc. Fungi11, 255–281. 10.1007/978-3-642-39339-6_11
169
WonglomP.ItoS.SunpapaoA. (2018). First report of Curvularia lunata causing leaf spot of Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis in Thailand. New Dis. Rep. 38:15. 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2018.038.015
170
World Health Organization (2022). WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action. Geneva: World Health Organization.
171
YuL. S.Rodriguez-ManzanoJ.Malpartida-CardenasK.SewellT.BaderO.Armstrong-JamesD.et al. (2019). Rapid and sensitive detection of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus by tandem repeat loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J. Mol. Diagn. 21, 286–295. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.10.004
172
ZhangS. X.CarrollK. C.LewisS.TottenM.MeadP.SamuelL.et al. (2020). Multicenter evaluation of a PCR-based digital microfluidics and electrochemical detection system for the rapid identification of 15 fungal pathogens directly from positive blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol.58:19. 10.1128/JCM.02096-19
173
ZhangY.-N.WangZ. J.SwingleB.NiuB. Y.XuJ.MaX.et al. (2022). First report of Rhizopus arrhizus (syn. R. oryzae) causing garlic bulb soft rot in Hebei Province, China. Plant Dis. 22:1024. 10.1094/PDIS-05-22-1024-PDN
174
ZhengH.HeY.KanS.LiD.LvG.ShenY.et al. (2019). In vitro susceptibility of dematiaceous fungi to nine antifungal agents determined by two different methods. Mycoses62, 384–390. 10.1111/myc.12895
175
ZhengH.SongN.MeiH.DongJ.LiD.LiX.et al. (2020). In vitro activities of ravuconazole and isavuconazole against dematiaceous fungi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, e00643–e00620. 10.1128/AAC.00643-20
176
ZhengR. Y.ChenG. Q.HuangH.LiuX. Y. (2007). A monograph of Rhizopus. Sydowia59:273.
177
ZhouH.WangD.ZhaoJ.DongB.ZhangX.WenC.et al. (2018). First report of Rhizopus head rot of sunflower caused by Rhizopus arrhizus (syn. R. oryzae) in Xinjiang and Gansu provinces of China. Plant Dis. 102, 1173–1173. 10.1094/PDIS-10-17-1528-PDN
178
ZijlstraE. E.Van De SandeW. W.WelshO.GoodfellowM.FahalA. H. (2016). Mycetoma: a unique neglected tropical disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 100–112. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00359-X
Summary
Keywords
emerging fungal pathogens, Aspergillus, trans-kingdom pathogens, cross-resistance, resistance markers, DMI fungicides, Rhizopus, Fusarium
Citation
Pintye A, Bacsó R and Kovács GM (2024) Trans-kingdom fungal pathogens infecting both plants and humans, and the problem of azole fungicide resistance. Front. Microbiol. 15:1354757. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1354757
Received
12 December 2023
Accepted
23 January 2024
Published
12 February 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Miguel Cacho Teixeira, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Reviewed by
László Majoros, University of Debrecen, Hungary
José Ascención Martínez-Álvarez, University of Guanajuato, Mexico
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Pintye, Bacsó and Kovács.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alexandra Pintye pintye.alexandra@atk.hun-ren.hu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.