ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1581312
This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobial Regulation of Plant Immunity: Mechanisms and ApplicationsView all 15 articles
Tar Sspot Ssusceptibility of corn Iinfluences Pphyllosphere-Aassociated Bbacterial and Ffungal Mmicrobiomes
Provisionally accepted- 1United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, United States
- 2Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Tar spot, caused by the obligate fungal pathogen Phyllachora maydis, is a major economic concern for corn producers in the United States. To test the hypothesis that P. maydis can interact with other foliar microorganisms, we investigated phyllosphere microbiomes in relation to corn inbreds with differential tar spot symptoms under natural field infestation. Sixteen inbred lines were assessed for tar spot symptoms, and bacterial and fungal microbiomes were characterized using Illumina MiSeq Sequencing. Comparison of the phyllosphere microbiomes revealed distinct bacterial and fungal communities between resistant and susceptible lines in a sample-specific manner. Bacterial alpha diversity did not differ significantly between susceptible and resistant lines, while fungal diversity (richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity) was significantly higher in resistant lines. Beta diversity analysis revealed significant structural differences in both bacterial and fungal communities, with fungal differences more pronounced and driven by relative abundance. Resistant lines were associated with plant-beneficial bacterial genera such as Quadrisphaera, Klenkia and Nocardioides and fungal genera Cladosporium, Coniothyrium, Alternaria, Epicoccum, Bipolaris, Phyllozyma, and Papiliotrema, while susceptible lines were dominated by Erwiniaceae, Aureimonas, Pseudomonas, Microbacterium, and Deinococcus and fungal genera Hannaella, Paraphaeosphaeria, Sphaerellopsis and Phyllachora. Coniothyrium, a potential mycoparasite of P. maydis, was also detected but whether it is the same species that was identified as in Central and South America is unknown. Our findings imply that P. maydis infection may result in a distinct, less diverse microbiome. Differential abundance analysis revealed enrichment of Erwiniaceae and Enterobacterales, particularly Amnibacterium in susceptible lines, and Microbacteriaceae in resistant lines. Correlation analysis between P. maydis reads and abundant taxa revealed a predominance of negative correlations, suggesting increased ecological niche differentiation driven by intense competition within the microbial community. These findings suggest that P. maydis infection is associated with a less diverse microbiome and that specific microbial taxa may play roles in P. maydis susceptibility and resistance. Further research on these correlated and distinct microbiotas could elucidate the role of foliar microbiomes in causing or resisting P. maydis infection.
Keywords: Maize, Microbial Diversity, microbiome, Phyllachora maydis, phyllosphere, Tar spot
Received: 21 Feb 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Singh, Sic-Hernandez, Crane, Shim, Telenko and Goodwin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Raksha Singh, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, United States
Stephen Bruce Goodwin, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.