ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Food Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1591202

This article is part of the Research TopicEnsuring Food Safety and Quality in Sustainable Emerging Production MethodsView all 6 articles

SPECIAL ISSUE Frontiers in Microbiology: Ensuring Food Safety and Quality in Sustainable Emerging Production Methods Sustainable Water Reuse in Food Production: Risks of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Release from Tertiary-Treated Reclaimed Water

Provisionally accepted
Pilar  TruchadoPilar Truchado1Márcia  OliveiraMárcia Oliveira2Rebeca  Cordero-GarcíaRebeca Cordero-García2manuel  Abellán Solermanuel Abellán Soler3Amador  RancañoAmador Rancaño4Francisca  GarcíaFrancisca García4Avelino  Alvarez-OrdóñezAvelino Alvarez-Ordóñez2ANA  ALLENDEANA ALLENDE1*
  • 1Research Group on Microbiology and Quality of Fruit and Vegetables, Center for Edaphology and Applied Biology of Segura, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
  • 2Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of León, León, Spain
  • 3ESAMUR, Murcia, Spain
  • 4ACCIONA AGUA, Madrid, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of four tertiary wastewater treatment technologies—peracetic acid (PAA), PAA combined with low-intensity ultraviolet-C (PAA/UV Low), high-intensity UV-C (UV High), and ultrafiltration (UF)—in reducing extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. coli) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in reclaimed water used for irrigation. The relative abundance of the genes, normalised to the 16S RNA gene present in the water samples, was then estimated to assess whether there is an amplification of these genes during the reuse process in the WWTP. The results indicate that while all treatments significantly reduced ESBL-E. coli (≥ 3 logs cfu/100 ml) and ARGs (≥ 1.5 logs gc/100 ml), complete elimination was not achieved in any wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Among the treatments, UF demonstrated the highest removal efficiency (≈ 4 log gc ARG/100 ml), against ARGs, followed by UV High (≈ 3 log gc ARG/100 ml), whereas PAA and PAA/UV Low were less effective (≈ 2 log gc ARG/100 ml). The study also found that while absolute ARG levels were reduced, their relative abundance remained stable or showed minimal decline, suggesting a persistent environmental reservoir of resistance genes. The most frequently detected ARGs were associated with tetracyclines (tetW, tetA), quinolones (qnrB, qnrS), and sulfonamides (sul1, sul2). Moreover, multidrug-resistant (MDR) ESBL-E. coli isolates were present across all WWTPs, exhibiting resistance to β-lactams, quinolones, tetracyclines, and sulfonamides. Notably, low levels of resistance to last-resort antibiotics (tigecycline, colistin, and meropenem) were observed, highlighting potential public health concerns.These findings underscore the critical role of tertiary treatments in mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) risks in water reuse systems. However, the persistence of ARGs in effluents suggests that current WWTP processes require further optimization.

Keywords: wastewater treatment, sustainable agriculture, ESBL-E. coli, antimicrobial 55 resistance (AMR), irrigation water, Irrigation water

Received: 10 Mar 2025; Accepted: 15 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Truchado, Oliveira, Cordero-García, Abellán Soler, Rancaño, García, Alvarez-Ordóñez and ALLENDE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: ANA ALLENDE, Research Group on Microbiology and Quality of Fruit and Vegetables, Center for Edaphology and Applied Biology of Segura, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Espinardo, E-30100, Murcia, Spain

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.