Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Food Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1605719

This article is part of the Research TopicBiofilm Control for Food Safety: From Processing to PackagingView all articles

Characterization of multispecies mixed biofilm microbial communities at beef and pork processing plants and their impact on pathogen stress tolerance

Provisionally accepted
  • 1U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Clay Center, United States
  • 2Texas A and M University, College Station, Texas, United States
  • 3University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica are major foodborne pathogens. Biofilm formation may contribute to product contamination by these pathogens at meat processing facilities. Further, pathogen stress tolerance may vary significantly due to the interactions with the multispecies microbial community at meat plants, which may be affected by processing activity, animal species, and the local selective pressure caused by sanitization practices. We characterized natural biofilms formed by microorganisms collected from floor drains at various areas at three beef plants and two pork plants and analyzed their impact on pathogen sanitizer tolerance. The pathogen strains were able to integrate into the mixed biofilms efficiently into the multispecies community attached on contact surfaces even under low temperatures (7 o C and 15C) commonly seen in processing facilities. Cell density of the adhered colonized S. enterica (4.9 to 6.3 log10 CFU/chip) in mixed biofilms was higher than E. coli O157:H7 (3.2 -5.2 log10 CFU/chip). Contact surface materials and meat plant types did not affect surface attachment colonization of either pathogen species. A multi-component sanitizer exhibited high efficiency that reduced the adhered integrated pathogen cells in most samples to a non-enumerable level. However, overall higher survival and post-sanitization recovery of pathogen cells were observed in the treated pork plant samples mixed biofilms than those in the beef plant samples. Scanning electron microscope analysis showed that the contact surface topography may impact the mixed biofilm morphology of the attached microcolonies and bacterial tolerance. Metagenomic analysis of the multispecies communities showed that Pseudomonadaceae, Halomonadaceae and Enterobacteriaceae were the three most abundant families across all samples. No significant difference in species genus compositions between the beef and pork plants or among the drain areas was observed. However, variations in the percentages of species' relative abundance were observed among the samples. The multispecies microbial community at the processing plants and the resulting interspecies interactions could influence the tolerance level of the pathogens integrated into the communitymixed biofilms. Therefore, research reports on sanitization processes and the resulting pathogen inactivation and prevalence prevention that are described for the different types of processing facilities should be analyzed on a case-to-case basis.

Keywords: Sanitization, Biofilm, beef and pork processing, Salmonella enterica, E. coli O157:H7, Metagenomics

Received: 03 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Chitlapilly Dass, Palanisamy, Zhou, Katz and Bosilevac. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rong Wang, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Clay Center, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.