ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Food Microbiology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1613058
This article is part of the Research TopicFood Safety in the Context of One Health: Current Trends, Challenges and PerspectivesView all 6 articles
An evaluation of the impact of abattoir processing on the levels of Campylobacter spp. and Enterobacteriaceae on broiler carcasses
Provisionally accepted
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Twenty years since the monitoring of foodborne diseases started in the EU and UK, Campylobacter infection is still the most reported zoonosis. This study aimed to investigate the impact of abattoir processing on the levels of Campylobacter spp. and Enterobacteriaceae on broiler carcasses, including the effect of hot water carcass immersion and ultrasound intervention, the abattoir's compliance with process hygiene criteria (PHC) and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp. strains.Methods: Neck skin samples (n = 270) were taken from seven broiler batches over seven sampling days in one abattoir, immediately after defeathering, evisceration, hot water immersion/ultrasound intervention and air-chilling (40 samples per day/batch). Quantification of Campylobacter spp. and Enterobacteriaceae was performed based on ISO methods following Campylobacter spp. confirmation on the MALDI-TOFF and PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. was performed via disc diffusion method using EUCAST guidelines.Campylobacter jejuni was confirmed in 93.7%, C. coli in 1.1% and Campylobacter spp. in 1.9% of samples. Abattoir processing significantly reduced final carcass microbial load, with an overall reduction in Campylobacter and Enterobacteriaceae levels of 1.14 log10 and 1.43 log10, respectively. Hot water immersion and ultrasound intervention substantially decreased Campylobacter levels by 0.85 log10 and Enterobacteriaceae levels by 0.82 log10. The abattoir was found unsatisfactory regarding compliance with PHC for Campylobacter levels within the sampling window, but satisfactory when the new proposed PHC for Enterobacteriaceae levels was applied. Antimicrobial resistance was found in Campylobacter isolates from all seven chicken batches, and 48.7% of isolates showed resistance to at least one antibiotic. Most isolates exhibited resistance to tetracycline (45%), nalidixic acid (41%) and ciprofloxacin (39%). Multidrug resistance was found in 2.7% of Campylobacter isolates, with combined resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and tetracycline in 1.6% of isolates.This study confirmed significant reduction of microbial load on chicken carcasses during abattoir processing, with an emphasis on the importance of using interventions in meat industry. The prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline is not declining in Campylobacter spp. on chicken meat, despite antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, and the presence of multidrug resistant strains may be of public health concern.
Keywords: Campylobacter, Enterobacteriaceae, Broiler carcass, abattoir, Interventions, ultrasound-hot water, Process hygiene criteria, antibiotic resistance
Received: 16 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Papoula-Pereira, Abdulla, Silver, Kellet and Antic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rita Papoula-Pereira, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.