Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Food Microbiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1636622

This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobiological Safety of Raw and Processed Meat ProductsView all articles

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Contamination in Meat and Meat Products: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Lili  XingLili Xing1Mao  ChengMao Cheng2Jide  JiangJide Jiang3Ting  LiTing Li4Xinyu  ZhangXinyu Zhang1Yunlong  TianYunlong Tian1*Wenjuan  LiuWenjuan Liu1*
  • 1Bacteriological Disease Laboratory, Yantai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yantai, China
  • 2Food Inspection and Testing Technology Teaching and Research Office,Yantai Engineering and Technology College, Yantai, China
  • 3Biology Department, Gaoling Town Junior High School of Muping District, Yantai, China
  • 4Pediatrics, Maternal and Child Health Center of Yantai Economic and Technological Development Zone, Yantai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is distributed all over the world and can easily colonize food animals, which can be transmitted through the food chain, posing a threat to food safety and public health. This study aimed to elucidate the global prevalence of MRSA contamination in meat and meat products via systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: A comprehensive retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies published up to December 10, 2024. Epidemiological data and study characteristics were extracted. Meta-analysis was made using a random-effects model in R software. Subgroup analyses were carried out by meat type, geographical region, and study period. Sensitivity analyses were launched to test the robustness of results, and the trim-and-fill method was applied to assess the potential impact of publication bias.Results: The pooled prevalence of MRSA contamination in meat and meat products was 3.72% (95% CI: 2.75%–5.02%). The prevalence was 4.46% (95%CI: 2.82%–6.98%) in raw livestock meat, 3.86% (95% CI: 2.58%–5.74%) in raw poultry meat, and 2.84% (95%CI: 0.55%–13.32%) in processed meat products. The Eastern Mediterranean region had the highest MRSA prevalence (9.13%; 95% CI: 4.28%–18.44%), while North America reported the lowest (1.89%; 95% CI: 1.30%–2.74%). Since 2015, the global prevalence of MRSA was 8.33% (95% CI: 5.29%–12.86%). The adjusted pooled prevalence increased to 14.04% (95% CI: 10.38%–18.73%) after applying the trim-and-fill method.Conclusion: The presence of MRSA in meat and meat products represents a public health concern. Enhanced surveillance efforts should prioritize raw livestock and poultry meat, particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean and Southeast Asia, to mitigate MRSA contamination in the food supply.

Keywords: Meat and meat products, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Prevalence, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

Received: 28 May 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xing, Cheng, Jiang, Li, Zhang, Tian and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yunlong Tian, Bacteriological Disease Laboratory, Yantai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yantai, China
Wenjuan Liu, Bacteriological Disease Laboratory, Yantai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yantai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.