Abstract
Defective viral genomes (DVGs) are fragments derived from defective interfering particles (DIPs) that form during viral replication. They play important roles by interfering with complete virus replication and regulating host immune responses. Advances in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and bioinformatic technology have significantly improved the ability to identify DIPs and DVGs. Their heterogeneity and dynamic formation mechanisms have been analyzed using long-read sequencing technologies. Both DIPs and DVGs inhibit wild-type viral proliferation by competing for viral replication resources and activating innate immune pathways such as those of retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 and mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein. This might influence infection outcomes by regulating inflammatory cytokine storms. The clinical application of DIPs and DVGs in their natural attenuated virus forms has been investigated in terms of novel vaccine design and antiviral therapy. This report systematically reviews cutting-edge detection techniques, molecular mechanisms, and translational medicine advances of DIPs and DVGs and provides a theoretical basis for developing broad-spectrum antiviral strategies based on DIPs.
1 Introduction
Infectious diseases pose a substantial global threat to human health and wellbeing (Kirtane et al., 2021), with each outbreak or pandemic having significant implications for public health systems and societal stability (Murphy, 2022). The diagnosis and management of viral infections warrant significant attention because they are primary causative agents of infectious diseases (Gebreyes et al., 2014). The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic lasted for almost 3 years, and resulted in >760 million confirmed infections and 6.9 million deaths (Yuan et al., 2023). The actual figures are believed to be significantly higher. Other viruses such as influenza (Taubenberger and Kash, 2010), Ebola (Jacob et al., 2020), dengue (Martina et al., 2009), and hepatitis B viruses (Yuen, 2018), continue to pose significant threats to human health. Developing effective vaccines and therapeutic agents is considered the most promising strategy for controlling infectious diseases (McArthur, 2019). However, the inherent biological characteristics of viruses pose significant challenges that complicate efforts to combat viral infections (Horvath and Barrangou, 2010), emphasizing the need for more effective treatments.
Numerous defective virus particles with biological activity identified in animal viruses during 1970 led to the concept of defective interfering particles (DIPs) (Huang and Baltimore, 1970). These particles are typically viral structural proteins that contain a segment of a viral genome and can replicate in the presence of a helper virus. They specifically inhibit the intracellular replication of unimpaired, homologous viruses. Defective viral genomes (DVGs) are truncated versions of their parent genomes that arise from an abnormal cycle of viral genomic replication (Brennan and Sun, 2024). Standard viruses (Genoyer and López, 2019) have complete genomes, which enables them to independently undergo an entire replication cycle unlike DIPs. Helper viruses (Manzoni and López, 2018) facilitate the replication and other functions of DIPs. The functions of DIPs include reducing virulence in vivo (Barrett and Dimmock, 1984; Rabinowitz and Huprikar, 1979), inducing robust interferon (IFN) expression during infection in vitro (Fuller and Marcus, 1980; Johnston, 1981), and promoting enhanced viral persistence in vivo (Baczko et al., 1986) and in vitro (De and Nayak, 1980; Kawai et al., 1975; Roux and Waldvogel, 1981; Schmaljohn and Blair, 1977; Sekellick and Marcus, 1978) (Figure 1). Despite potent functionality, DIPs and their associated DVGs were initially considered as artifacts of viral replication in vitro that were unrelated to natural viral infections, owing to technological limitations that prevented their identification in vivo (Viola et al., 1978). Thus, investigation into DIPs was constrained by such limitations and gradually stagnated for decades.
Figure 1
However, recent scientific and technological advancements, particularly the advent of second-generation sequencing technologies, have led to the discovery of DVGs among many viral families (Pathak and Nagy, 2009; López, 2014; Rezelj et al., 2018). Concurrently, DVGs derived from RNA viruses modulate immune responses to viral infections, indicating their potentially crucial role in determining infection outcomes (Genoyer and López, 2019). This review examines the research technologies, mechanisms of action, and clinical applications of DIPs and their associated DVGs, to elucidate their roles in viral infection and facilitate their eventual clinical applications.
The infection process begins when a cell is infected by the standard virus, which then disseminates to adjacent cells. In the presence of the standard virus, DIPs undergo conditional replication, thereby disrupting the replication cycle of the standard virus and promoting the accumulation of DIPs while effectively reducing the viral titer of the standard virus.
2 Technical support
Current identification and characterization of defective virus genome sequences primarily depend on high throughput sequencing (HTS; also known as next-generation sequencing, NGS) technologies and bioinformatic analyses. This report elaborates on the application of these methods to the study of DVGs.
2.1 Application of HTS technologies in viral genome sequencing
High throughput sequencing can simultaneously analyze vast numbers of DNA or RNA molecules within a very brief timeframe. This technology has been extensively applied to genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenetics, including the critical task of determining viral genome sequences (Slatko et al., 2018; Sharma et al., 2018).
Plaque assays in susceptible cell cultures are widely used to detect and quantify most viral species. However, conventional plaque assays cannot reliably quantify DVGs, as they do not complete replication cycles (Muñoz-Sánchez et al., 2024; Marx, 2023). The isolation and quantitation of DVGs using biochemical techniques have posed significant challenges. Consequently, the primary approaches to DVGs have shifted towards sequencing technologies and bioinformatics methodologies (Hwang et al., 2018).
Compared with conventional sequencing techniques, HTS simultaneously analyses a vast number of DNA or RNA fragments. This facilitates the rapid detection of DVGs in samples (Trebbien et al., 2018; Sheng et al., 2018) and significantly enhances sequencing efficiency. Comprehensive sequencing of the entire genome at multiple locations can be achieved in a single run through HTS, which also provides improved depth and exact mapping of DVG sites. The components of DVG have been analyzed in detail because of HTS technology. Advances in HTS technology have facilitated breakthroughs in elucidating the production (Alnaji et al., 2021; Pelz et al., 2021) and composition (Muñoz-Sánchez et al., 2024) of DVGs, which has significantly enhanced understanding of the various types of DVGs (Genoyer and López, 2019). Previous investigations into DVGs were frequently small-scale or constrained to specific viral species due to the prohibitively high cost of sequencing. The advent of HTS technology has significantly lowered these costs, facilitating a transition in DVG research from isolated case studies to comprehensive, large-scale explorations. It is noteworthy that in some reports, viral samples were amplified in vitro prior to HTS, leading to alterations in the population of defective viral genomes and consequently affecting sequencing results (Li et al., 2024). Although certain challenges remain, the advancement of HTS permits extensive sequencing analyses of diverse viral types and deeper investigations into the variability of DVGs.
2.2 Application of bioinformatics tools in identifying DVGs
2.2.1 Strategies and algorithms used to identify DVGs
A popular strategy for DVG identification using HTS involves read alignment to a reference viral genome, followed by the localization of base-pair and relative index positions. Several bioinformatics tools have recently been developed in response to this need (Table 1). An early program called Paparazzi, was initially designed to exclude rather than to identify DVGs in samples for viral genome reconstruction (Vodovar et al., 2011). The first algorithm specifically designed for DVG identification in HTS data was ViReMa-a. Along with DI-tector, it remains the most widely used algorithm for DVG detection (Routh and Johnson, 2014; Beauclair et al., 2018).
Table 1
| Aspect | Legacy pipeline | Next-generation pipeline |
|---|---|---|
| Data source | Short-read sequencing [e.g., Illumina MiSeq (Wagner et al., 2025)] | Long-read sequencing [e.g., Nanopore (Ndekezi et al., 2025], PacBio [Jia et al., 2024)], hybrid sequencing |
| Detection method | Alignment-based detection [e.g., BWA (Bian et al., 2025), GATK (Wang et al., 2024)], simple deletions detection | Machine learning [e.g., DVGfinder (Olmo-Uceda et al., 2022)], structural variant calling [e.g., Sniffles (Sedlazeck et al., 2018)] |
| Tool dependency | Traditional aligners [e.g., Bowtie2 (Zhou et al., 2024), BWA], custom Perl or Python scripts | Specialized DVG tools [e.g., ViReMa (Sotcheff et al., 2023), DI-tector (Beauclair et al., 2018), DVGfinder] |
| Compute architecture | Single-node or basic high performance computing | Distributed computing |
| Sensitivity | Low (alignment-dependent, misses complex DVGs) | High (hybrid assembly and alignment, detects chimeric or rearranged DVGs) |
| False positive control | Manual filtering [e.g., IGV inspection (Robinson et al., 2023)] | Automated filters (ML models, statistical significance) |
| Standardization | Lab-specific, no consensus | Standardized workflows [e.g., ViReflow (Moshiri et al., 2022)] |
| Reproducibility | Low | High |
| Virus compatibility | Primarily RNA viruses | Both DNA and RNA viruses |
| Representative tools | Custom scripts, early ViReMa | ViReMa, DVGfinder, DI-tector, iVar (Castellano et al., 2021) |
A comparison of legacy pipeline and next-generation pipeline.
The machine learning (ML)-based, metasearch tool DVG-finder aimed to specifically and accurately identify DVGs in RNA-sequencing data (Olmo-Uceda et al., 2022). However, several algorithms, such as ViReMa-a and DI-tector, introduce bioinformatic artifacts during identification that could potentially lead to false positives or false negatives that reduce sensitivity (Bosma et al., 2019). By integrating ViReMa-a and DI-tector, DVG-finder has standardized terminology and incorporates additional descriptive variables into a unified workflow. This approach leverages ML to minimize false positives and provides an HTML report with graphical outputs, while preserving the distinct data generated by ViReMa-a and DI-tector.
2.2.2 Operation mode and performance analysis of DVG-finder
The computational algorithms ViReMa-a and DI-tector are integrated into DVG-finder to detect DVGs in samples. Detected DVGs are processed through the distinct operating modes of meta-search, consensus, and filtering. All identified DVG data are shown in meta-search mode, whereas only DVGs detected by both algorithms are revealed in consensus mode. The filtering mode shows DVG data that meet or surpass a user-specified true-positive probability threshold. Using synthetic samples derived from SARS-CoV-2 and TuMV genomes, an evaluation of DVG-finder modes revealed that the meta-search mode was more sensitive than the ViReMa-a algorithm, whereas all modes were more accurate and F1 scores were better than the DI-tector algorithm (Olmo-Uceda et al., 2022).
Overall, DVG-finder incorporates the two most prevalent DVG detection algorithms and enhances their performance by ML, thus facilitating more efficient and precise identification and analysis of DVGs.
3 Primary types and generation mechanisms of DVGs
Research into DVGs has been hampered the absence of technology that could identify and distinguish DIPs from parental viruses (Manzoni and López, 2018). High throughput technologies have facilitated comprehensive studies, enabling the detection of various types of DVGs in most RNA virus families (Brennan and Sun, 2024). Deletion, copy-back (cb), and snap-back (sb) are primary types of DVGs (Vignuzzi and López, 2019). All three types can execute a full replication cycle with the help of parental viruses (Genoyer and López, 2019). The characteristics of these DVGs and how they are generated are described below.
3.1 Characteristics and generation of deletion DVGs
Deletion DVGs are prevalent in positive-strand RNA viruses such as alphaviruses, flaviviruses, picornaviruses, and coronaviruses (Li and Aaskov, 2014; Poirier et al., 2015; Liao et al., 2014; McLaren and Holland, 1974). The key characteristics are large internal deletions in critical genomic sequences, and preserved promoter sequences and cis-acting elements that play essential roles in replication and packaging (Li and Aaskov, 2014; Duhaut and Dimmock, 2000). Internal segments of the viral genome are missing from deletion DVGs. The DVGs are thought to be generated during viral genome replication as RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) pauses upon encountering secondary structures or lesion sites, then detaches from the template strand and reinitiates synthesis at new positions on the same or another template strand, producing daughter strands without internal regions. The production of deletion DVGs is considered to result from a replication-associated mechanism, during which RdRp transfers from a donor, to an acceptor template, while maintaining its connection to the nascent strand (Perrault and Semler, 1979).
3.2 Characteristics and generation process of copy-back DVGs
Non-segmented negative-strand RNA viruses such as paramyxovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and filovirus frequently harbor cbDVGs that contain structurally rearranged genomes that have reverse complementation at the 5′ and 3′ ends; this configuration theoretically produces a long stem-loop structure (Perrault and Leavitt, 1978; Re et al., 1983; Kolakofsky, 1976). The mechanism underlying the generation of cbDVGs remain obscure. A leading hypothesis proposes that cbDVGs form during viral genome replication through a process in which the RdRp disengages from the parental template strand, reattaches to the daughter strand, uses it as a template, and extends synthesis from the 5′ end. The RdRp of negative-sense RNA viruses lacks proofreading activity, facilitating template switching. Additionally, high multiplicity of infection (MOI) or rapid replication increases RdRp error rates, thereby promoting the generation of cbDVGs (Lazzarini et al., 1981; Perrault, 1981).
3.3 Characteristics and generation process of snap-back DVGs
The characteristics and production process of sbDVGs are analogous to those of cbDVGs, with the distinction that their complementary double-stranded regions encompass almost the entire genome, and contain only one non-complementary nucleotide (Nichol et al., 1984).
4 Functions and mechanisms of DVGs
The DVGs can impede parental virus replication, induce interferon production, stimulate immune responses, and extend the duration of viral infection. These mechanisms are discussed below.
4.1 Inhibition of viral replication
Both DVGs and DIPs can directly interfere with the replication of standard viruses. Because the genome sequence in DIPs is shorter than that of standard viral genomes, they are smaller than intact virus particles (Li and Aaskov, 2014; Von Magnus, 1954; Calain and Roux, 1988; Treuhaft and Beem, 1982; Girgis et al., 2022; Huang et al., 1966). The shorter sequences of deletion DVGs and cbDVGs is thought to allow for stronger replication dynamics of the DIP genome (Huang and Baltimore, 1970). Two trailer promoter sequences characterize cbDVGs. The trailer promoter sequence in negative-strand RNA viruses is responsible for cbDVG formation and is more conducive to genome replication than the conventional leader promoter, thus granting cbDVGs a replication edge. In addition, DVGs in some species of viral DIPs enhance polymerase binding to nuclear proteins through mutations in promoter sequences, further augmenting their replication efficiency (Calain and Roux, 1995; Kolakofsky, 1979; Rao and Huang, 1982). Consequently, the DIP genome exploits the replication machinery that restricts access to proteins essential for standard virus replication, which results in a lower yield of the standard virus (Lazzarini et al., 1981; Perrault, 1981; Portner and Kingsbury, 1971; Giachetti and Holland, 1989). By competing for essential structural proteins necessary for packaging, DVGs can restrict the synthesis of standard viruses (Brennan and Sun, 2024). In conclusion, DVGs harboring cis-acting elements essential for genome replication and virion packaging can disrupt standard virus replication by competing for scarce polymerases, critical viral proteins, and other cellular resources in co-infected cells.
Elevated DVG levels can also decrease the synthesis of functional template mRNAs available for viral replication, thereby indirectly reducing the intracellular accumulation of viral proteins. The phenomenon occurs because deletion DVGs do not have essential coding regions for specific mRNAs, and duplication-derived DVGs cannot encode functional mRNAs (Brennan and Sun, 2024). Concurrently, accumulated DVGs in cells can stimulate PRRs, triggering a signaling cascade that enhances the expression of IFN and IFN-stimulated genes. As a result, the replication of standard viruses or the formation of standard virus particles is suppressed. For example, cells containing abundant DVGs, especially cbDVGs, can recognize and trigger signaling by mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) through RIG-I-like receptors. This leads to upregulated IFN types I and III signaling pathways and disrupted standard virus formation (Brennan and Sun, 2024; Genoyer and López, 2019; Manzoni and López, 2018).
4.2 Activation of innate immunity
Deletion DVGs, cbDVGs, and sbDVGs all elicit robust IFN responses. Specifically, cbDVGs activate the RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) pathway, which leads to the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and IL-1β, thus promoting responses to IFN types I and III (Johnston, 1981; Tapia et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2015; Marcus and Gaccione, 1989; Strähle et al., 2007). This is attributed to the fact that unlike the standard viral genome, the specific 5′ end diphosphorylated or triphosphorylated blunt-ended double-stranded RNA structure of cbDVGs can theoretically form RIG-I ligands to bind with RLR. The innate immune response stimulated by cbDVGs boosts antigen presentation and concurrently drives dendritic cell maturation.
Deletion DVGs derived from DIPs associated with influenza, dengue, and Sindbis viruses induce the IFN response (Fuller and Marcus, 1980; Lin et al., 2022; Pelz et al., 2023). Deletion DVGs in poliovirus induce a powerful IFN response (Xiao et al., 2021). The abundance of DVGs and the magnitude of the IFN response significantly and positively correlated during the COVID pandemic (Zhou et al., 2023). Deletion DVGs produce PRRs such as RLRs that are activated during the replication of DVG or their double-stranded RNA intermediates, thus initiating the IFN pathway and resulting in the expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) and IFN generation. Meanwhile, recent studies reveal that some coronavirus DVGs encode cryptic proteins capable of suppressing RIG-I signaling—challenging existing paradigms of DVG-host interactions (Hsu et al., 2025). However, the specific sequences or secondary structures within deletion DVGs that could be recognized by RLRs have not been identified.
4.3 Association with viral persistence
Although DVGs and DIPs interfere with the generation of standard viruses, the quantity of these generated viruses conversely influences DVGs and DIPs. Standard virus infection of a single cell results in neighboring cells becoming infected. As the amount of standard viruses increase in a single cell, DVGs/DIPs are synthesized de novo. Thereafter, DIPs replicate dependently on standard viruses and hinder their replication (as described in section 2.2). This leads to DIP accumulation and decreased standard virus titers. A reduction in the titer of standard viruses within a cell population ultimately causes a significant decrease in the amount of cells simultaneously infected by standard viruses and DIPs. As DIPs require standard viruses for replication and packaging, cells infected exclusively by DIPs cannot propagate, which causes a decline in DIP titers. In contrast, cells infected with standard viruses can only produce standard virus particles, which increases titers. When the titer of standard viruses increases, DVGs and DIPs will recommence generation, initiating a new cycle. This is referred to as the DIP and standard virus asynchronous cycle or the Von Magnus effect (Huang and Baltimore, 1970) that renders persistent and cyclical viral infection.
In addition, the composition of viral genome species is heterogenous. Some cells are enriched with DVGs, whereas others are enriched in canonical viral genomes. Mitochondrial antiviral signaling proteins are activated by cells with abundant DVGs, resulting in the production of IFN and other proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, which has dual functions during infection, contingent upon engaged signaling pathways. Specifically, TNF acts as a proinflammatory and pro-apoptotic agent when signaling through the TNFR1 pathway, but functions as a pro-survival factor via the TNFR2 pathway. Activating the TNFR1 pathway promotes the apoptosis of cells enriched with canonical viral genomes. Conversely, the TNFR2 pathway, along with downstream signaling molecules such as TNF receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1), prolongs the survival of cells with elevated DVG levels, which extends persistent infections (Xu et al., 2017). Collectively, DVGs can facilitate the persistent infection of viruses.
Overall, the inhibition of standard virus replication is closely associated with the role of IFNs. Furthermore, the establishment of persistent infections is related to the replication of standard viruses and the production of IFN and other cytokines (Figure 2). Therefore, the interference of standard virus replication with DVGs and DIPs, the induction of IFN generation, immune response activation, and prolonged infection cycles are not mutually independent processes, but they notably correlate.
Figure 2
5 Progress in clinical applications of DVGs
Because of their capacity to disrupt normal viral replication and trigger production, DVGs are considered attractive options for antiviral treatments (Genoyer and López, 2019; Stegmann et al., 2022). Live attenuated vaccines frequently contain DIPs, theoretically supporting the notion that DVGs could substitute for conventional vaccine adjuvants. In addition to these two primary areas, DVGs might play special roles in enhancing clinical management (Felt et al., 2021) and in developing anti-tumor medications (Lu et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2019).
5.1 Antiviral medication therapy
After host viral infection, DIPs are naturally generated and impact infection through mechanisms such as interfering with viral replication and stimulating immune responses (Rezelj et al., 2018; Dimmock and Easton, 2014; Dimmock et al., 1986; Ziegler and Botten, 2020). Consequently, DIPs are promising antiviral therapeutic agents (Dimmock and Easton, 2014; Doyle and Holland, 1973; Chambers and Webster, 1991; Nelson and Perelson, 1995). Furthermore, various therapeutic interfering particles (TIPs) have been created (Metzger et al., 2011; Weinberger et al., 2003) that has encouraged the application of DVGs to clinical settings. In fact, DIPs and TIPs based on RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, flavivirus, and Influenza A Virus (IAV), have advanced to the animal experimental stage [a systematic review of IAV DIPs has been published (Wu et al., 2022)]. They typically offer benefits including low susceptibility to drug resistance and broad-spectrum antiviral activity, which support further investigation and the creation of novel antiviral medications (Table 2).
Table 2
| Name | Source | Mode of action | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eTIP1 (Xiao et al., 2021) | Capsid coding region of poliovirus | Triggers interferon response to exert broad-spectrum anti-infection effects; stimulates production of neutralizing antibodies to provide immune protection | Safety features; low drug resistance | Might induce cytokine storm (Fajgenbaum and June, 2020; Findlay et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2021) |
| Lipid nanoparticles TIPs (Chaturvedi et al., 2021; Chaturvedi et al., 2022) | Subgenomic RNA of SARS-CoV-2 | Reduce the viral load; Down-regulate relevant genes to inhibit the pro-inflammatory immune response; shorten the nasal shedding time of SARS-CoV-2 | A more long-lasting protective effect; low drug resistance | It is still unclear whether its generation and dissemination are spontaneous; it is unable to completely block the transmission of the virus |
| DIPs (Lin et al., 2022) | Purified DENV-2 | Inhibit viral replication; Activate the type I interferon response; may quickly trigger the innate immune response of the host | Inhibit the replication of Dengue virus, Zika virus, Yellow fever virus, Respiratory syncytial virus and the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 | The impact on the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement remains unclear |
| IAV DIPs (Pelz et al., 2021; Rand et al., 2021; Huo et al., 2020) | IAV | Induce an innate immune response that signaled through janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT); increase the production of type I and type III interferons | Broad-spectrum antiviral activity, completely inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2; rapid action; low drug resistance | There are difficulties in production and purification |
| OP7 (Hein et al., 2021; Kupke et al., 2019) | The genomic vRNA of S7 of IAV that harbors 37 point mutations | Significantly reduce the viral titer; stimulate the innate immune response | Successfully fight against IAV infection | There may be differences in purity, activity and other aspects among different batches of OP7 |
| DI244 (Bdeir et al., 2019; Hein et al., 2021) | Pure cloned IAV free from the contamination of Standard Virus | Interfere with viral replication; induce interferon production | Broad-spectrum antiviral activity; rapid action; low drug resistance; more convenient for production | The production quality cannot be assured |
| NiV DIPs (Welch et al., 2020) | NiV | Reduce the viral titer; compete with the parental viral genome for the viral protein pool and some host cell factors, thus interfering with replication and assembly | Directly reduce the replication of NiV in vitro; provide immediate protection | The design and production remain to be optimized; there is a potential risk of drug resistance |
| CHIKV DVGs (Levi et al., 2021) | CHIKV | Compete with the wild-type virus for resources needed for replication, thereby inhibiting replication; may interfere with the synthesis of viral structural proteins, thus affecting the assembly process | Broad-spectrum antiviral activity; Pre-injection can inhibit the spread of the virus within mosquitoes; has potential immune-stimulating ability. | The frequency of its occurrence in mosquitoes is minimal; it is difficult to separating it from the wild-type virus; it is difficult to choose a suitable in vivo model to assess its effectiveness |
| Zika virus TIPs (Rezelj et al., 2021) | Screen for DVG-A after serial passage of Zika virus at a high MOI, and then package them into TIPs | Competing with the wild-type virus for essential viral proteins required for replication and packaging, as well as relying on an intact RNA interference pathway to suppress replication | Inhibit viral infection and transmission, which may avoid the occurrence of complications; reduce the transmission of the virus within mosquitoes | The effectiveness in different situations needs to be further demonstrated; long-term use may induce immune problems |
| DIPs without infectious DENV-2 (Li et al., 2021) | DENV - 2 | Inhibit viral replication; activate the interferon response | Broad-spectrum antiviral activity; absence of transmissible viral contamination risk | The mechanism of action remains to be elucidated; in vivo investigations are currently limited |
| RSV cbDVGs (Felt et al., 2021) | RSV | Interfere with viral replication; induce the expression of interferons and interferon-stimulated genes | Predict the severity of RSV infection; guide clinical management and improve the prognosis | Easily affected by other factors; there are limitations in the detection technology |
A Summary of DVGs applications in antiviral therapy from 2019 to 2024.
DENV-2 is Dengue virus serotype 2, IAV is Influenza A virus, vRNA is viral RNA, S7 is segment 7, NiV is Nipah virus, MOI is multiplicity of infection.
Most synthetic DIPs and TIPs are deletion-type, meaning that their genomes lack nucleotide sequences and require parental virus support for dispersal. A small proportion of these are cb types that are usually found in paramyxoviruses (see Section 2.1.2). Recent studies have identified a new class of DIPs (Kupke et al., 2019). In contrast to the traditional deletion types, these DIPs have point mutations in their genomes.
Both DIPs and TIPs conventionally co-infect facilitated by the parental virus, and they target the same infected cells and tissues. This process disrupts replication of the parental virus, with significant specificity. Moreover, DIPs possess broad-spectrum activity because they compete with other viruses for cell surface receptors, intracellular enzymes, nucleotides, and other resources necessary for replication, even though they do not mediate heterologous viral interference (Huang and Baltimore, 1970). This has been found when DIPs (Li et al., 2021) act in the absence of infectious Dengue virus 2 (DENV-2). DIPs can cause host cells to create neutralizing antibodies and IFN responses, which lowers viral titers, decreases disease severity, and shields the host from further viral infections. For instance, IAV DIPs (Rand et al., 2021), by activating responses of IFN types I and III, can suppress IAV replication, while alleviating SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The emergence of the novel coronavirus during 2019 significantly influenced daily living and global productivity. Despite notable progress in vaccines (Zasada et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024), and therapies (Li et al., 2020; Su et al., 2020; Aanouz et al., 2021), high viral mutation rates (Focosi and Maggi, 2021; Ghildiyal et al., 2024; Planas et al., 2021; Cao et al., 2022; Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021) and drug resistance (Iketani et al., 2023; Duan et al., 2023) still hinder treatment effectiveness. Therefore, improving the effects of medications are crucial. In this context, antiviral strategies based on DIPs have been investigated to treat COVID-19. An antiviral eTIP1 created by deleting the coding region of the poliovirus capsid stimulates the immune system and initiates the IFN response in mice (Xiao et al., 2021). The approach also offers decreased drug resistance and increased safety features. Furthermore, inflammation, lung edema, and pulmonary viral loads are decreased in hamsters administered with intranasal TIPs (Chaturvedi et al., 2021). At lower dosages, the antiviral activity of TIPs resembles that of small-molecule antiviral medications and monoclonal antibodies. This represents a significant advantage of TIPs in clinical research. Defective viral genomes are frequently generated during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and they contribute to prolonged viral replication and the induction of responses to IFN types I and III. Overall, these results lay the groundwork for the subsequent development of antiviral medications and related vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 (Zhou et al., 2023).
Antiviral therapy based on DVGs offers significant advantages over conventional treatments as they can specifically spread alongside their parent virus, which makes it easier for them to exert a therapeutic effect. In addition, this strategy is less likely to cause drug resistance and broad-spectrum antiviral action. However, several obstacles associated with safety, production, and quality control must be overcome before DVGs could be applied to clinical treatment.
5.2 Vaccine adjuvants
In addition to aiding the development of antiviral medications, DVGs might be useful as adjuvants that increase the effectiveness of vaccines via several mechanisms, such as PRR stimulation (Reijers et al., 2022). Defective interfering particles are abundant in current live-attenuated vaccines, including those for poliovirus (McLaren and Holland, 1974), measles (Bellocq et al., 1990), and influenza (Gould et al., 2017) viruses. They have several benefits, such as safety, immunogenicity, and the ability to naturally permeate cells and target multiple PRRs. Specifically, they can induce host immune defense (Vasou et al., 2017) (Figure 3).
Figure 3
RNA oligonucleotides and 268 nt oligonucleotides derived from the DVGs of Sendai virus, are intriguing new immune-inducing adjuvants because of their low cost, high stability, favorable sequences, and potential for large-scale manufacture (Fisher et al., 2018; Mercado-López et al., 2013). Recent studies demonstrate that defective interfering RNAs (DI RNAs) from Sendai virus and influenza virus, when employed as vaccine adjuvants, can promote Th1-type immune responses, shift IgG subtypes toward IgG2b, and induce Th17-type immune responses. Moreover, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) or nanoemulsions (NE) can work in concert with these adjuvants to improve immune responses. Critically, in murine models challenged with homologous influenza viruses, vaccines adjuvanted with such DVG-RNAs significantly reduce weight loss and suppress pulmonary viral replication—protective outcomes strongly correlated with augmented immune responses (Jangra et al., 2024; Wong et al., 2021).
The live-attenuated recombinant vaccine candidate ML29 comprising Mopeia and Lassa viruses, is a promising treatment for Lassa fever (Hallam et al., 2018). Attenuation is high in animal models when DIPs are enriched in ML29. In particular, CBA/J mice, STAT-1−/− mice, and Hartley guinea pigs had no signs or symptoms, serious illness or abnormalities, indicating that vaccines containing DIPs could improve safety and immunogenicity and aid the induction of wider cross-protection (Johnson et al., 2021).
Although DVGs offer advantages over traditional vaccine adjuvants, they might also interfere with vaccine production (Zinnecker et al., 2024). For example, they can raise the complexity and impurity levels of the production process and impact the stability of continuous virus generation. Moreover, suitable materials and technological procedures must be developed to prevent DIPs from degrading quickly in vivo and to allow for precise targeting of immune cells.
DVGs possess significant potential for application in disease diagnosis and prognosis, although current research in this domain remains limited in scope. The content of DVGs is linked to the severity of the disease (Vasilijevic et al., 2017; Penn et al., 2022), which could help anticipate how the condition will progress. According to a study on respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) DVGs (Felt et al., 2021), identifying DVGs in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients can help physicians create customized diagnosis and treatment plans, making it easier to identify patients who require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, DVGs have the potential to serve as a biomarker for ICU admission.
5.3 Clinical applications: from RNA viruses to DNA viruses
It should be noted that although RNA viruses have received the majority of attention in DVG research, dsDNA viruses—especially herpesviruses—should also be considered. Two types of HSV-1 DVGs were identified decades ago. Researchers have been delving deeply into the properties and processes of HSV-1 DVGs development in recent years, uncovering the sequence-driven and cell-specific mechanisms that underlie these formations (Shitrit et al., 2023). This gives us a foundation to comprehend their function in viral infection and evolution. HSV-1-derived amplicon vectors and non-replicating genomic vectors have also demonstrated promise in gene therapy (Le Hars et al., 2025; Ingusci et al., 2025). Apart from herpesviruses, analysis of urine samples from immunosuppressed patients revealed the presence of DVGs in both BK and JC polyomaviruses, with persistence observed throughout the infection course. This study provides the first confirmation of DVG prevalence in clinical DNA virus samples, expanding our understanding of their role in clinical virology (Addetia et al., 2021).
6 Conclusion
Since the discovery of DVGs studies have encountered significant challenges. Recent technological advancements have enabled the detection and sequencing of DVGs in experimental and natural viral infections, thus deepening understanding of the mechanisms of their production and function, and expanding the diversity of the DVG family. Moreover, DVG-based antiviral therapies might offer advantages over traditional approaches. They co-transmit with standard viruses and have broad-spectrum antiviral activity. Furthermore, protective effects mediated by DVGs are rapid, potent, and durable, with a lower likelihood of inducing drug resistance. However, the application of DVGs to therapeutic settings still faces several challenges. The design of effective DIPs is complex, and computational methods have difficulty identifying optimal antiviral candidates (Pelz et al., 2021). Owing to transmission bottlenecks, TIPs cannot be effectively transmitted between hosts (Chaturvedi et al., 2022), thus requiring more advanced production techniques. Current research is limited to experimental animal models, and extending these findings to human trials remains a significant challenge because of inherent differences in data sources between human and other animal models (Li et al., 2024; Chaturvedi et al., 2021). Moreover, contamination due to genetic recombination during the preparation of DIPs might be a potential concern (Barone et al., 2020). Given the widespread incidence of DVGs in live attenuated vaccines, intensifying research on these vaccines is imperative to gain new insights into the mechanisms of action of DVGs. This review primarily focuses on RNA viruses. However, almost all families of viruses harbor DVGs, but much remains to be discovered. Therefore, further investigation is required to expand the depth of knowledge. We anticipate that DVGs will be clinically applied to alleviate and treat various human diseases after questions are answered and problems are addressed.
Statements
Author contributions
XY: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. YP: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. PL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. LZ: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. JY: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. CS: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. BZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. WZ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32370146), Guangdong Special Support Plan Provincial Health Commission (HealthTalents) Project Guangdong Provincial Health Commission Project (grant no. 0720240122), Guangzhou Basic Research Program (grant no. 2023A03J0810), Guangdong Province Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund Project (grant no. 2024A1515010995) and Guangdong Science and Technology Program key projects (grant no. 2021B1212030014).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Correction note
A correction has been made to this article. Details can be found at: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1670478.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AanouzI.BelhassanA.El-KhatabiK.LakhlifiT.El-IdrissiM.BouachrineM. (2021). Moroccan medicinal plants as inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 main protease: computational investigations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.39, 2971–2979. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1758790
2
AddetiaA.PhungQ.BradleyB. T.LinM. J.ZhuH.XieH.et al. (2021). In vivo generation of BK and JC polyomavirus defective viral genomes in human urine samples associated with higher viral loads. J. Virol.95:21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00250-21
3
AlnajiF. G.ReiserW. K.Rivera-CardonaJ.Te VelthuisA. J. W.BrookeC. B. (2021). Influenza a virus defective viral genomes are inefficiently packaged into Virions relative to wild-type genomic RNAs. MBio12:e0295921. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02959-21
4
BaczkoK.LiebertU. G.BilleterM.CattaneoR.BudkaH.ter MeulenV. (1986). Expression of defective measles virus genes in brain tissues of patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. J. Virol.59, 472–478. doi: 10.1128/jvi.59.2.472-478.1986
5
BaroneP. W.WiebeM. E.LeungJ. C.HusseinI. T. M.KeumurianF. J.BouressaJ.et al. (2020). Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies. Nat. Biotechnol.38, 563–572. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0507-2
6
BarrettA. D.DimmockN. J. (1984). Modulation of Semliki Forest virus-induced infection of mice by defective-interfering virus. J. Infect. Dis.150, 98–104. doi: 10.1093/infdis/150.1.98
7
BdeirN.AroraP.GärtnerS.HoffmannM.ReichlU.PöhlmannS.et al. (2019). A system for production of defective interfering particles in the absence of infectious influenza a virus. PLoS One14:e0212757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212757
8
BeauclairG.MuraM.CombredetC.TangyF.JouvenetN.KomarovaA. V. (2018). DI-tector: defective interfering viral genomes' detector for next-generation sequencing data. RNA24, 1285–1296. doi: 10.1261/rna.066910.118
9
BellocqC.MottetG.RouxL. (1990). Wide occurrence of measles virus subgenomic RNAs in attenuated live-virus vaccines. Biologicals18, 337–343. doi: 10.1016/1045-1056(90)90039-3
10
BianW.ZhangB.SongZ.KnisbacherB. A.ChanY. M.BaoC.et al. (2025). SplitFusion enables ultrasensitive gene fusion detection and reveals fusion variant-associated tumor heterogeneity. Patterns6:101174. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2025.101174
11
BosmaT. J.KaragiannisK.Santana-QuinteroL.IlyushinaN.ZagorodnyayaT.PetrovskayaS.et al. (2019). Identification and quantification of defective virus genomes in high throughput sequencing data using DVG-profiler, a novel post-sequence alignment processing algorithm. PLoS One14:e0216944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216944
12
BrennanJ. W.SunY. (2024). Defective viral genomes: advances in understanding their generation, function, and impact on infection outcomes. MBio15:e0069224. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00692-24
13
CalainP.RouxL. (1988). Generation of measles virus defective interfering particles and their presence in a preparation of attenuated live-virus vaccine. J. Virol.62, 2859–2866. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.8.2859-2866.1988
14
CalainP.RouxL. (1995). Functional characterisation of the genomic and antigenomic promoters of Sendai virus. Virology212, 163–173. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.1464
15
CaoY.WangJ.JianF.XiaoT.SongW.YisimayiA.et al. (2022). Omicron escapes the majority of existing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. Nature602, 657–663. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04385-3
16
CastellanoS.CestariF.FaglioniG.TenediniE.MarinoM.ArtusoL.et al. (2021). iVar, an interpretation-oriented tool to manage the update and revision of variant annotation and classification. Genes12:384. doi: 10.3390/genes12030384
17
ChambersT. M.WebsterR. G. (1991). Protection of chickens from lethal influenza virus infection by influenza a/chicken/Pennsylvania/1/83 virus: characterization of the protective effect. Virology183, 427–432. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90160-D
18
ChaturvediS.BeutlerN.VasenG.PabloM.ChenX.CaliaG.et al. (2022). A single-administration therapeutic interfering particle reduces SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding and pathogenesis in hamsters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA119:e2204624119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204624119
19
ChaturvediS.VasenG.PabloM.ChenX.BeutlerN.KumarA.et al. (2021). Identification of a therapeutic interfering particle-a single-dose SARS-CoV-2 antiviral intervention with a high barrier to resistance. Cell184, 6022–6036.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.004
20
DeB. K.NayakD. P. (1980). Defective interfering influenza viruses and host cells: establishment and maintenance of persistent influenza virus infection in MDBK and HeLa cells. J. Virol.36, 847–859. doi: 10.1128/jvi.36.3.847-859.1980
21
DimmockN. J.BeckS.McLainL. (1986). Protection of mice from lethal influenza: evidence that defective interfering virus modulates the immune response and not virus multiplication. J. Gen. Virol.67, 839–850.
22
DimmockN. J.EastonA. J. (2014). Defective interfering influenza virus RNAs: time to reevaluate their clinical potential as broad-spectrum antivirals?J. Virol.88, 5217–5227. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03193-13
23
DoyleM.HollandJ. J. (1973). Prophylaxis and immunization in mice by use of virus-free defective T particles to protect against intracerebral infection by vesicular stomatitis virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA70, 2105–2108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.7.2105
24
DuanY.ZhouH.LiuX.IketaniS.LinM.ZhangX.et al. (2023). Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nirmatrelvir. Nature622, 376–382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06609-0
25
DuhautS.DimmockN. J. (2000). Approximately 150 nucleotides from the 5′ end of an influenza a segment 1 defective virion RNA are needed for genome stability during passage of defective virus in infected cells. Virology275, 278–285. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0502
26
FajgenbaumD. C.JuneC. H. (2020). Cytokine Storm. N. Engl. J. Med.383, 2255–2273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2026131
27
FeltS. A.SunY.JozwikA.ParasA.HabibiM. S.NickleD.et al. (2021). Detection of respiratory syncytial virus defective genomes in nasal secretions is associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat. Microbiol.6, 672–681. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00882-3
28
FindlayJ. S.UlaetoD.D'EliaR. V. (2015). Cytokines and viral hemorrhagic fever: potential for therapeutic intervention. Future Virol.10, 547–557. doi: 10.2217/fvl.15.5
29
FisherD. G.CoppockG. M.LópezC. B. (2018). Virus-derived immunostimulatory RNA induces type I IFN-dependent antibodies and T-cell responses during vaccination. Vaccine36, 4039–4045. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.100
30
FocosiD.MaggiF. (2021). Neutralising antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: risk assessment for antibody-based Covid-19 therapeutics and vaccines. Rev. Med. Virol.31, 3664–3702. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2231
31
FullerF. J.MarcusP. I. (1980). Interferon induction by viruses. IV. Sindbis virus: early passage defective-interfering particles induce interferon. J. Gen. Virol.48, 63–73. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-48-1-63
32
Garcia-BeltranW. F.LamE. C.St DenisK.NitidoA. D.GarciaZ. H.HauserB. M.et al. (2021). Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity. Cell184:2372. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.013
33
GebreyesW. A.Dupouy-CametJ.NewportM. J.OliveiraC. J.SchlesingerL. S.SaifY. M.et al. (2014). The global one health paradigm: challenges and opportunities for tackling infectious diseases at the human, animal, and environment interface in low-resource settings. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.8:e3257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003257
34
GenoyerE.LópezC. B. (2019). The impact of defective viruses on infection and immunity. Annu. Rev. Virol.6, 547–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-092818-015652
35
GhildiyalT.RaiN.RawatJ. M.SinghM.AnandJ.PantG.et al. (2024). Challenges in emerging vaccines and future promising candidates against SARS-CoV-2 variants. J Immunol Res2024:9125398. doi: 10.1155/2024/9125398
36
GiachettiC.HollandJ. J. (1989). Vesicular stomatitis virus and its defective interfering particles exhibit in vitro transcriptional and replicative competition for purified L-NS polymerase molecules. Virology170, 264–267. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90375-9
37
GirgisS.XuZ.OikonomopoulosS.FedorovaA. D.TchesnokovE. P.GordonC. J.et al. (2022). Evolution of naturally arising SARS-CoV-2 defective interfering particles. Commun. Biol.5:1140. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04058-5
38
GouldP. S.EastonA. J.DimmockN. J. (2017). Live attenuated influenza vaccine contains substantial and unexpected amounts of defective viral genomic RNA. Viruses9:269. doi: 10.3390/v9100269
39
HallamH. J.HallamS.RodriguezS. E.BarrettA. D. T.BeasleyD. W. C.ChuaA.et al. (2018). Baseline mapping of Lassa fever virology, epidemiology and vaccine research and development. NPJ Vaccines3:11. doi: 10.1038/s41541-018-0049-5
40
HeinM. D.AroraP.Marichal-GallardoP.WinklerM.GenzelY.PöhlmannS.et al. (2021). Cell culture-based production and in vivo characterization of purely clonal defective interfering influenza virus particles. BMC Biol.19:91. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01020-5
41
HeinM. D.KollmusH.Marichal-GallardoP.PüttkerS.BenndorfD.GenzelY.et al. (2021). OP7, a novel influenza a virus defective interfering particle: production, purification, and animal experiments demonstrating antiviral potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.105, 129–146. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-11029-5
42
HorvathP.BarrangouR. (2010). CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science327, 167–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1179555
43
HsuH. W.ChangL. K.YangC. C.LinC. H.TengY.HsuP. C.et al. (2025). Diverse effects of coronavirus-defective viral genomes on the synthesis of IFNβ and ISG15 mRNAs and coronavirus replication. Virol. J.22:37. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02654-5
44
HuangA. S.BaltimoreD. (1970). Defective viral particles and viral disease processes. Nature226, 325–327. doi: 10.1038/226325a0
45
HuangA. S.GreenawaltJ. W.WagnerR. R. (1966). Defective T particles of vesicular stomatitis virus. I. preparation, morphology, and some biologic properties. Virology30, 161–172. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(66)90092-4
46
HuoC.ChengJ.XiaoJ.ChenM.ZouS.TianH.et al. (2020). Defective viral particles produced in mast cells can effectively fight against lethal influenza a virus. Front. Microbiol.11:553274. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.553274
47
HwangB.LeeJ. H.BangD. (2018). Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics pipelines. Exp. Mol. Med.50, 1–14. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0071-8
48
IketaniS.MohriH.CulbertsonB.HongS. J.DuanY.LuckM. I.et al. (2023). Multiple pathways for SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nirmatrelvir. Nature613, 558–564. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05514-2
49
IngusciS.GoinsW. F.CohenJ. B.MiyagawaY.KnipeD. M.GloriosoJ. C. (2025). Next-generation replication-defective HSV vectors for delivery of large DNA payloads. Mol. Ther.33, 2205–2216. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.03.055
50
JacobS. T.CrozierI.FischerW. A.HewlettA.KraftC. S.VegaM. A.et al. (2020). Ebola virus disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers6:13. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0147-3
51
JangraS.LamootA.SinghG.LaghlaliG.ChenY.YeT.et al. (2024). Lipid nanoparticle composition for adjuvant formulation modulates disease after influenza virus infection in quadrivalent influenza vaccine vaccinated mice. Front. Immunol.15:1370564. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1370564
52
JiaH.TanS.CaiY.GuoY.ShenJ.ZhangY.et al. (2024). Low-input PacBio sequencing generates high-quality individual fly genomes and characterizes mutational processes. Nat. Commun.15:5644. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49992-6
53
JohnsonD. M.CubittB.PfefferT. L.de la TorreJ. C.LukashevichI. S. (2021). Lassa virus vaccine candidate ML29 generates truncated viral RNAs which contribute to interfering activity and attenuation. Viruses13:214. doi: 10.3390/v13020214
54
JohnstonM. D. (1981). The characteristics required for a Sendai virus preparation to induce high levels of interferon in human lymphoblastoid cells. J. Gen. Virol.56, 175–184. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-56-1-175
55
KawaiA.MatsumotoS.TanabeK. (1975). Characterization of rabies viruses recovered from persistently infected BHK cells. Virology67, 520–533. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(75)90452-3
56
KirtaneA. R.VermaM.KarandikarP.FurinJ.LangerR.TraversoG. (2021). Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases. Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 369–384. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00866-8
57
KolakofskyD. (1976). Isolation and characterization of Sendai virus DI-RNAs. Cell8, 547–555. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90223-3
58
KolakofskyD. (1979). Studies on the generation and amplification of Sendai virus defective-interfering genomes. Virology93, 589–593. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(79)90263-0
59
KupkeS. Y.RiedelD.FrensingT.ZmoraP.ReichlU. (2019). A novel type of influenza a virus-derived defective interfering particle with nucleotide substitutions in its genome. J. Virol.93:18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01786-18
60
LazzariniR. A.KeeneJ. D.SchubertM. (1981). The origins of defective interfering particles of the negative-strand RNA viruses. Cell26, 145–154. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90298-1
61
Le HarsM.JoussainC.JéguT.EpsteinA. L. (2025). Non-replicative herpes simplex virus genomic and amplicon vectors for gene therapy - an update. Gene Ther.32, 173–183. doi: 10.1038/s41434-024-00500-x
62
LeviL. I.RezeljV. V.Henrion-LacritickA.ErazoD.BoussierJ.ValletT.et al. (2021). Defective viral genomes from chikungunya virus are broad-spectrum antivirals and prevent virus dissemination in mosquitoes. PLoS Pathog.17:e1009110. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009110
63
LiD.AaskovJ. (2014). Sub-genomic RNA of defective interfering (D.I.) dengue viral particles is replicated in the same manner as full length genomes. Virology468, 248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.08.013
64
LiR.HouY.HuangJ.PanW.MaQ.ShiY.et al. (2020). Lianhuaqingwen exerts anti-viral and anti-inflammatory activity against novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Pharmacol. Res.156:104761. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104761
65
LiD.LinM.-H.RawleD. J.JinH.WuZ.WangL.et al. (2021). Dengue virus-free defective interfering particles have potent and broad anti-dengue virus activity. Commun. Biol.4:557. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02064-7
66
LiX.YeZ.PlantE. P. (2024). 5′ copyback defective viral genomes are major component in clinical and non-clinical influenza samples. Virus Res.339:199274. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2023.199274
67
LiaoW. Y.KeT. Y.WuH. Y. (2014). The 3′-terminal 55 nucleotides of bovine coronavirus defective interfering RNA harbor cis-acting elements required for both negative- and positive-strand RNA synthesis. PLoS One9:e98422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098422
68
LinM. H.LiD.TangB.LiL.SuhrbierA.HarrichD. (2022). Defective interfering particles with broad-acting antiviral activity for dengue, Zika, yellow fever, respiratory syncytial and SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. Microbiol. Spectr.10:e0394922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03949-22
69
LópezC. B. (2014). Defective viral genomes: critical danger signals of viral infections. J. Virol.88, 8720–8723. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00707-14
70
LuF.MartinK. A.SoldanS. S.KossenkovA. V.WickramasingheP.VladimirovaO.et al. (2021). Defective Epstein-Barr virus genomes and atypical viral gene expression in B-cell lines derived from multiple myeloma patients. J. Virol.95:e0008821. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00088-21
71
ManzoniT. B.LópezC. B. (2018). Defective (interfering) viral genomes re-explored: impact on antiviral immunity and virus persistence. Future Virol.13, 493–503. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2018-0021
72
MarcusP. I.GaccioneC. (1989). Interferon induction by viruses. XIX. Vesicular stomatitis virus--New Jersey: high multiplicity passages generate interferon-inducing, defective-interfering particles. Virology171, 630–633. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90637-5
73
MartinaB. E.KorakaP.OsterhausA. D. (2009). Dengue virus pathogenesis: an integrated view. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.22, 564–581. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00035-09
74
MarxV. (2023). Method of the year: long-read sequencing. Nat. Methods20, 6–11. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01730-w
75
McArthurD. B. (2019). Emerging infectious diseases. Nurs. Clin. North Am.54, 297–311. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2019.02.006
76
McLarenL. C.HollandJ. J. (1974). Defective interfering particles from poliovirus vaccine and vaccine reference strains. Virology60, 579–583. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(74)90352-3
77
Mercado-LópezX.CotterC. R.KimW.-K.SunY.MuñozL.TapiaK.et al. (2013). Highly immunostimulatory RNA derived from a Sendai virus defective viral genome. Vaccine31, 5713–5721. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.040
78
MetzgerV. T.Lloyd-SmithJ. O.WeinbergerL. S. (2011). Autonomous targeting of infectious superspreaders using engineered transmissible therapies. PLoS Comput. Biol.7:e1002015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002015
79
MoshiriN.FischK. M.BirminghamA.DeHoffP.YeoG. W.JepsenK.et al. (2022). The ViReflow pipeline enables user friendly large scale viral consensus genome reconstruction. Sci. Rep.12:5077. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09035-w
80
Muñoz-SánchezJ. C.Olmo-UcedaM. J.OteoJ.ElenaS. F. (2024). Quantifying defective and wild-type viruses from high-throughput RNA sequencing. Bioinformatics40:651. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae651
81
MurphyR. J. (2022). Communicable diseases in humanitarian operations and disasters. BMJ Mil. Health.168, 457–461. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001415
82
NdekeziC.ByamukamaD.KatoF.OmaraD.NakyanziA.NatwijukaF.et al. (2025). Bonoboflow: viral genome assembly and haplotype reconstruction from nanopore reads. Bioinform. Adv.5:vbaf115. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf115
83
NelsonG. W.PerelsonA. S. (1995). Modeling defective interfering virus therapy for AIDS: conditions for DIV survival. Math. Biosci.125, 127–153. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(94)00021-Q
84
NicholS. T.O'HaraP. J.HollandJ. J.PerraultJ. (1984). Structure and origin of a novel class of defective interfering particle of vesicular stomatitis virus. Nucleic Acids Res.12, 2775–2790. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.6.2775
85
Olmo-UcedaM. J.Muñoz-SánchezJ. C.Lasso-GiraldoW.ArnauV.DÃaz-VillanuevaW.ElenaS. F. (2022). DVGfinder: a metasearch tool for identifying defective viral genomes in RNA-Seq data. Viruses14:14. doi: 10.3390/v14051114
86
PathakK. B.NagyP. D. (2009). Defective interfering RNAs: foes of viruses and friends of virologists. Viruses1, 895–919. doi: 10.3390/v1030895
87
PelzL.PiagnaniE.MarsallP.WynserskiN.HeinM. D.Marichal-GallardoP.et al. (2023). Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of influenza a defective interfering particles against respiratory syncytial, yellow fever, and Zika virus replication in vitro. Viruses15:872. doi: 10.3390/v15091872
88
PelzL.RüdigerD.DograT.AlnajiF. G.GenzelY.BrookeC. B.et al. (2021). Semi-continuous propagation of influenza a virus and its defective interfering particles: analyzing the dynamic competition to select candidates for antiviral therapy. J. Virol.95:e0117421. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01174-21
89
PennR.TregoningJ. S.FlightK. E.BaillonL.FriseR.GoldhillD. H.et al. (2022). Levels of influenza a virus defective viral genomes determine pathogenesis in the BALB/c mouse model. J. Virol.96:e0117822. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01178-22
90
PerraultJ. (1981). Origin and replication of defective interfering particles. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.93, 151–207.
91
PerraultJ.LeavittR. W. (1978). Inverted complementary terminal sequences in single-stranded RNAs and snap-back RNAs from vesicular stomatitis defective interfering particles. J. Gen. Virol.38, 35–50. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-38-1-35
92
PerraultJ.SemlerB. L. (1979). Internal genome deletions in two distinct classes of defective interfering particles of vesicular stomatitis virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA76, 6191–6195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6191
93
PlanasD.VeyerD.BaidaliukA.StaropoliI.Guivel-BenhassineF.RajahM. M.et al. (2021). Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization. Nature596, 276–280. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03777-9
94
PoirierE. Z.MounceB. C.Rozen-GagnonK.HooikaasP. J.StaplefordK. A.MoratorioG.et al. (2015). Low-Fidelity polymerases of alphaviruses recombine at higher rates to overproduce defective interfering particles. J. Virol.90, 2446–2454. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02921-15
95
PortnerA.KingsburyD. W. (1971). Homologous interference by incomplete Sendai virus particles: changes in virus-specific ribonucleic acid synthesis. J. Virol.8, 388–394. doi: 10.1128/jvi.8.4.388-394.1971
96
RabinowitzS. G.HuprikarJ. (1979). The influence of defective-interfering particles of the PR-8 strain of influenza a virus on the pathogenesis of pulmonary infection in mice. J. Infect. Dis.140, 305–315. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.3.305
97
RandU.KupkeS. Y.ShkarletH.HeinM. D.HirschT.Marichal-GallardoP.et al. (2021). Antiviral activity of influenza a virus defective interfering particles against SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro through stimulation of innate immunity. Cells10:756. doi: 10.3390/cells10071756
98
RaoD. D.HuangA. S. (1982). Interference among defective interfering particles of vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Virol.41, 210–221. doi: 10.1128/jvi.41.1.210-221.1982
99
ReG. G.GuptaK. C.KingsburyD. W. (1983). Genomic and copy-back 3′ termini in Sendai virus defective interfering RNA species. J. Virol.45, 659–664. doi: 10.1128/jvi.45.2.659-664.1983
100
ReijersI. L. M.MenziesA. M.van AkkooiA. C. J.VersluisJ. M.van den HeuvelN. M. J.SawR. P. M.et al. (2022). Personalized response-directed surgery and adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in high-risk stage III melanoma: the PRADO trial. Nat. Med.28, 1178–1188. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01851-x
101
RezeljV. V.CarrauL.MerwaissF.LeviL. I.ErazoD.TranQ. D.et al. (2021). Defective viral genomes as therapeutic interfering particles against flavivirus infection in mammalian and mosquito hosts. Nat. Commun.12:2290. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22341-7
102
RezeljV. V.LeviL. I.VignuzziM. (2018). The defective component of viral populations. Curr. Opin. Virol.33, 74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.07.014
103
RobinsonJ. T.ThorvaldsdottirH.TurnerD.MesirovJ. P. (2023). Igv.Js: an embeddable JavaScript implementation of the integrative genomics viewer (IGV). Bioinformatics39:830. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac830
104
RouthA.JohnsonJ. E. (2014). Discovery of functional genomic motifs in viruses with ViReMa-a virus recombination mapper-for analysis of next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res.42:e11. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt916
105
RouxL.WaldvogelF. A. (1981). Establishment of Sendai virus persistent infection: biochemical analysis of the early phase of a standard plus defective interfering virus infection of BHK cells. Virology112, 400–410. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90287-7
106
SchmaljohnC.BlairC. D. (1977). Persistent infection of cultured mammalian cells by Japanese encephalitis virus. J. Virol.24, 580–589. doi: 10.1128/jvi.24.2.580-589.1977
107
SedlazeckF. J.ReschenederP.SmolkaM.FangH.NattestadM.von HaeselerA.et al. (2018). Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods15, 461–468. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0001-7
108
SekellickM. J.MarcusP. I. (1978). Persistent infection. I interferon-inducing defective-interfering particles as mediators of cell sparing: possible role in persistent infection by vesicular stomatitis virus. Virology85, 175–186. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(78)90422-1
109
SharmaT. R.DevannaB. N.KiranK.SinghP. K.AroraK.JainP.et al. (2018). Status and prospects of next generation sequencing Technologies in Crop Plants. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol.27, 1–36. doi: 10.21775/cimb.027.001
110
ShengZ.LiuR.YuJ.RanZ.NewkirkS. J.AnW.et al. (2018). Identification and characterization of viral defective RNA genomes in influenza B virus. J. Gen. Virol.99, 475–488. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001018
111
ShitritA.NisnevichV.RozenshteinN.KoboH.PhanH. V.TayS.et al. (2023). Shared sequence characteristics identified in non-canonical rearrangements of HSV-1 genomes. J. Virol.97:e0095523. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00955-23
112
SlatkoB. E.GardnerA. F.AusubelF. M. (2018). Overview of next-generation sequencing technologies. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol.122:e59. doi: 10.1002/cpmb.59
113
SotcheffS.ZhouY.YeungJ.SunY.JohnsonJ. E.TorbettB. E.et al. (2023). ViReMa: a virus recombination mapper of next-generation sequencing data characterizes diverse recombinant viral nucleic acids. Gigascience12:12. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giad009
114
StegmannK. M.DickmannsA.HeinenN.BlaurockC.KarraschT.BreithauptA.et al. (2022). Inhibitors of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase cooperate with molnupiravir and N4-hydroxycytidine to suppress SARS-CoV-2 replication. iScience25:104293. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104293
115
SträhleL.MarqJ. B.BriniA.HausmannS.KolakofskyD.GarcinD. (2007). Activation of the beta interferon promoter by unnatural Sendai virus infection requires RIG-I and is inhibited by viral C proteins. J. Virol.81, 12227–12237. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01300-07
116
SuH.-x.YaoS.ZhaoW.-f.LiM.-j.LiuJ.ShangW.-j.et al. (2020). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities in vitro of Shuanghuanglian preparations and bioactive ingredients. Acta Pharmacol. Sin.41, 1167–1177. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-0483-6
117
SunY.JainD.Koziol-WhiteC. J.GenoyerE.GilbertM.TapiaK.et al. (2015). Immunostimulatory defective viral genomes from respiratory syncytial virus promote a strong innate antiviral response during infection in mice and humans. PLoS Pathog.11:e1005122. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005122
118
TapiaK.KimW. K.SunY.Mercado-LópezX.DunayE.WiseM.et al. (2013). Defective viral genomes arising in vivo provide critical danger signals for the triggering of lung antiviral immunity. PLoS Pathog.9:e1003703. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003703
119
TaubenbergerJ. K.KashJ. C. (2010). Influenza virus evolution, host adaptation, and pandemic formation. Cell Host Microbe7, 440–451. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.05.009
120
TrebbienR.ChristiansenC. B.FischerT. K. (2018). Antiviral resistance due to deletion in the neuraminidase gene and defective interfering-like viral polymerase basic 2 RNA of influenza a virus subtype H3N2. J. Clin. Virol.102, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.02.005
121
TreuhaftM. W.BeemM. O. (1982). Defective interfering particles of respiratory syncytial virus. Infect. Immun.37, 439–444. doi: 10.1128/iai.37.2.439-444.1982
122
VasilijevicJ.ZamarreñoN.OliverosJ. C.Rodriguez-FrandsenA.GómezG.RodriguezG.et al. (2017). Reduced accumulation of defective viral genomes contributes to severe outcome in influenza virus infected patients. PLoS Pathog.13:e1006650. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006650
123
VasouA.SultanogluN.GoodbournS.RandallR. E.KostrikisL. G. (2017). Targeting pattern recognition receptors (PRR) for vaccine Adjuvantation: from synthetic PRR agonists to the potential of defective interfering particles of viruses. Viruses9:186. doi: 10.3390/v9070186
124
VignuzziM.LópezC. B. (2019). Defective viral genomes are key drivers of the virus-host interaction. Nat. Microbiol.4, 1075–1087. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0465-y
125
ViolaM. V.ScottC.DuffyP. D. (1978). Persistent measles virus infection in vitro and in man. Arthritis Rheum.21, S47–S51. doi: 10.1002/art.1780210906
126
VodovarN.GoicB.BlancH.SalehM. C. (2011). In silico reconstruction of viral genomes from small RNAs improves virus-derived small interfering RNA profiling. J. Virol.85, 11016–11021. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05647-11
127
Von MagnusP. (1954). Incomplete forms of influenza virus. Adv. Virus Res.2, 59–79. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60529-1
128
WagnerD. D.NabakoozaG.MominN.MarineR. L. (2025). Illumina MiSeq and iSeq platforms yield comparable results for viral genomic sequencing. J. Virol. Methods338:115202. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2025.115202
129
WangQ.GuoY.MellisI. A.GherasimC.ValdezR.BowenA.et al. (2024). XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine booster elicits robust neutralizing antibodies against XBB subvariants and JN.1. Cell Host Microbe32:315. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.01.014
130
WangT.ZhangY.WangH.ZhengQ.YangJ.ZhangT.et al. (2024). Fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow composed of LUSH toolkit. Hum. Genomics18:114. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00666-w
131
WeinbergerL. S.SchafferD. V.ArkinA. P. (2003). Theoretical design of a gene therapy to prevent AIDS but not human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol.77, 10028–10036. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.18.10028-10036.2003
132
WelchS. R.TilstonN. L.LoM. K.WhitmerS. L. M.HarmonJ. R.ScholteF. E. M.et al. (2020). Inhibition of Nipah virus by defective interfering particles. J. Infect. Dis.221, S460–S470. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz564
133
WongP. T.GoffP. H.SunR. J.RugeM. J.ErmlerM. E.SebringA.et al. (2021). Combined intranasal Nanoemulsion and RIG-I activating RNA adjuvants enhance mucosal, humoral, and cellular immunity to influenza virus. Mol. Pharm.18, 679–698. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00315
134
WuM.ZhouE.ShengR.FuX.LiJ.JiangC.et al. (2022). Defective interfering particles of influenza virus and their characteristics, impacts, and use in vaccines and antiviral strategies: a systematic review. Viruses14:773. doi: 10.3390/v14122773
135
XiaoY.LidskyP. V.ShiroganeY.AvinerR.WuC. T.LiW.et al. (2021). A defective viral genome strategy elicits broad protective immunity against respiratory viruses. Cell184, 6037–51.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.023
136
XuJ.SunY.LiY.RuthelG.WeissS. R.RajA.et al. (2017). Replication defective viral genomes exploit a cellular pro-survival mechanism to establish paramyxovirus persistence. Nat. Commun.8:799. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00909-6
137
YangY.LyuT.ZhouR.HeX.YeK.XieQ.et al. (2019). The antiviral and antitumor effects of defective interfering particles/genomes and their mechanisms. Front. Microbiol.10:1852. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01852
138
YuanS.JiangS.-C.ZhangZ.-W.FuY.-F.HuJ.LiZ.-L. (2021). Quantification of cytokine storms during virus infections. Front. Immunol.12:659419. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.659419
139
YuanY.JiaoB.QuL.YangD.LiuR. (2023). The development of COVID-19 treatment. Front. Immunol.14:1125246. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1125246
140
YuenH. (2018). Hepatitis B virus infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers4:18036. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.36
141
ZasadaA. A.DarlinskaA.WiatrzykA.WoznicaK.ForminskaK.CzajkaU.et al. (2023). COVID-19 vaccines over three years after the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic. Viruses15, 1–34. doi: 10.3390/v15091786
142
ZhouT.GilliamN. J.LiS.SpandauS.OsbornR. M.ConnorS.et al. (2023). Generation and functional analysis of defective viral genomes during SARS-CoV-2 infection. MBio14:e0025023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00250-23
143
ZhouB.WangC.PutzelG.HuJ.LiuM.WuF.et al. (2024). An integrated strain-level analytic pipeline utilizing longitudinal metagenomic data. Microbiol. Spectr.12:e0143124. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01431-24
144
ZieglerC. M.BottenJ. W. (2020). Defective interfering particles of negative-Strand RNA viruses. Trends Microbiol.28, 554–565. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.02.006
145
ZinneckerT.ReichlU.GenzelY. (2024). Innovations in cell culture-based influenza vaccine manufacturing - from static cultures to high cell density cultivations. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.20:2373521. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2373521
Summary
Keywords
interfering particle, defective viral genome, identification, function, application
Citation
Yan X, Pan Y, Li P, Zhu L, Yu J, Shen C, Zhang B and Zhao W (2025) Identification, functional analysis, and clinical applications of defective viral genomes. Front. Microbiol. 16:1642520. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1642520
Received
06 June 2025
Accepted
08 July 2025
Published
17 July 2025
Corrected
11 August 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Eleonora Cella, University of Central Florida, United States
Reviewed by
Ran Wang, Capital Medical University, China
Ewan P. Plant, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States
Mohamed H. Maarouf, Suez Canal University, Egypt
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Yan, Pan, Li, Zhu, Yu, Shen, Zhang and Zhao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wei Zhao, zhaowei@smu.edu.cnBao Zhang, zhangb@smu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.