Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Virology

Development and Validation of a Novel Triplex Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of African Swine Fever Virus, Pseudorabies Virus, and Porcine Parvovirus

Provisionally accepted
Jiarong  YuJiarong Yu1*Lu  ZhuLu Zhu2Yuanyuan  ZuoYuanyuan Zuo1Shengbin  GaoShengbin Gao1Qinghua  WangQinghua Wang1Jiao  XuJiao Xu1Linlin  FangLinlin Fang1Yumeng  LiuYumeng Liu1Shuang  LiuShuang Liu1Xiaozhen  WangXiaozhen Wang1Xiaohua  WangXiaohua Wang1Yingli  WangYingli Wang1Jingming  LiJingming Li1Jingyue  BaoJingyue Bao1*Zhiliang  WangZhiliang Wang1*
  • 1China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, China
  • 2Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Coinfection with multiple viruses significantly complicates swine disease management. DNA viruses including African swine fever virus (ASFV), pseudorabies virus (PRV), and porcine parvovirus (PPV) are causing reproductive failure in sows, with overlapping clinical presentations that challenge differential diagnosis. To address this, we developed a novel triplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay using three distinct fluorescent probe sets for simultaneous detection of these three viruses. The multiplex ddPCR demonstrated superior analytical performance with high specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. When compared to conventional quantitative PCR (qPCR), the ddPCR assay achieved limits of detection (LOD) of 0.08, 3.41, and 3.38 copies/μL for ASFV, PRV, and PPV respectively-representing approximately 10-fold lower LOD values than corresponding qPCR methods. Cross-reactivity tests confirmed absolute specificity against other important swine pathogens. Clinical validation using 217 field samples revealed marked diagnostic advantages: ddPCR detected positive cases in 137 samples (63.1%) versus 115 (53.0%) by qPCR. Species-specific positivity rates showed ddPCR improved detection by 5.99% (ASFV), 0.46% (PRV), and 3.69% (PPV) compared to qPCR. Concordance analysis demonstrated strong agreement between methods (94.01%-99.54%), with ddPCR showing superior sensitivity particularly for low-viral-load samples. This study establishes the first multiplex digital PCR platform for simultaneous differential diagnosis of ASFV, PRV, and PPV. The assay provides a robust tool for enhanced surveillance and control of these economically significant pathogens in swine populations.

Keywords: clinical diagnosis, multiplex droplet digital PCR, ASFV, prv, PPV

Received: 22 Sep 2025; Accepted: 03 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Zhu, Zuo, Gao, Wang, Xu, Fang, Liu, Liu, Wang, Wang, Wang, Li, Bao and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jiarong Yu
Jingyue Bao
Zhiliang Wang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.