Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Microbiol., 06 January 2026

Sec. Microbial Symbioses

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1719918

Boron symbiotaxis: a new concept in host–microbiome communication

Andreea Silvia PîrvuAndreea Silvia Pîrvu1Andrei Bi&#x;&#x;,Andrei Biţă2,3Ion Romulus Scorei
Ion Romulus Scorei4*Dan Ionu&#x; GheoneaDan Ionuţ Gheonea5George Dan Mogoanu,George Dan Mogoşanu2,3
  • 1Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
  • 2Drug Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
  • 3Department of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
  • 4Department of Biochemistry, BioBoron Research Institute, S.C. Natural Research S.R.L., Podari, Romania
  • 5Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania

Boron (B) participates in biological systems through reversible complexation with diols and phosphate esters, enabling it to stabilize labile furanosyl intermediates and to modulate the chemical landscape in which QS signals operate. Dietary B appears to enter two functional pools: plasma-accessible boron (PAB), composed of freely diffusible B(OH)3/B(OH)4, and microbiota-accessible boron complexes (MABCs), formed in situ with polyols, chlorogenic acids, and fructans/inulins. MABCs persist at the mucus–epithelium interface, creating local reservoirs that can influence the persistence, diffusion, and recognition of AI-2-related molecules. Here we propose a structured, testable framework—“boron symbiotaxis”—to describe how B may stabilize 4,5-dihydroxypentane-2,3-dione (DPD)-derived intermediates (and, in defined lineages, form the furanosyl borate diester AI-2B), localize chemical potential via MABCs at the mucosal surface, and orient microbial behavior toward particular community states. This framework does not assume that enhanced AI-2 signaling is inherently beneficial; QS coherence can also support opportunistic growth or virulence, depending on ecological context. We therefore outline experimental approaches—including speciation-resolved 11B–NMR, targeted LC–MS for AI-2/AI-2B, and bacterial reporter strains with defined AI-2 receptors—to discriminate beneficial from adverse outcomes. Altogether, we highlight B as a chemically plausible modulator of QS architectures in the gut, propose falsifiable predictions linking diet → B speciation → AI-2 dynamics → host phenotypes, and identify scenarios in which B-driven stabilization or localization could be either advantageous or detrimental.

1 Introduction

The symbiotic relationship between humans and their gut microbiome is orchestrated through an intricate web of chemical exchanges (Bassler, 1999; Chigozie et al., 2025). Central to this dialogue are quorum sensing (QS) molecules—autoinducers that coordinate microbial density, cooperation, and interspecies behaviors. Among them, the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) system has been described as a broadly conserved “lingua franca” of bacteria. In several lineages and environmental contexts, the biologically active species is a borate-complexed furanosyl signal (AI-2B), whose stability and receptor-competent conformation depend on boron (B) availability (Chen et al., 2002).

Unlike classical cofactors such as Mg2+, Zn2+, or Fe2+/3+, B operates primarily through dynamic covalency, forming reversible complexes with cis-diols (in sugars, polyols, polyphenols) and interacting cooperatively with phosphate esters. This chemistry stabilizes labile, information-bearing molecules, biases equilibria between furanosyl and open-chain forms, and, in the case of AI-2B, incorporates B directly into the architecture of a QS signal. We refer to B’s directional role in this network as “boron symbiotaxis”: the stabilization of key signals, the localization of chemical potential via microbiota-accessible boron complexes (MABCs), and the orientation of host–microbe dialogue toward cooperative, resilient states (Biţă et al., 2022).

B bioavailability to the gut ecosystem follows two complementary routes. Plasma-accessible boron (PAB), largely present as freely diffusible boric acid (BA), is absorbed in the upper intestine and distributed systemically. In parallel, MABCs form in the intestinal lumen from dietary polyols, polyphenols, and chlorogenic acids (CGAs), generating poorly absorbed borate–diol conjugates that persist at the mucosal interface (Biţă et al., 2022, Biţă et al., 2023a,b). In this mini-review, we use the term “speciation” in its chemical sense, to denote the distribution of B among molecular forms (e.g., B(OH)3, B(OH)4, borate–diol complexes). Local chemical speciation, rather than total intake, is therefore poised to influence when and where QS signals operate at the host–microbiome boundary.

Several broader reviews have discussed B nutrition, B-containing natural products, and B–microbiota interactions, including work from our own group and others. In contrast, the present mini-review has a narrower, mechanistic scope: we focus on how B chemistry may intersect with AI-2 signaling architectures and how PAB versus MABCs might shape QS behavior at the mucosal interface. We introduce “boron symbiotaxis” as a hypothesis that integrates these observations into testable predictions, rather than as a new physiological law.

2 Boron chemistry in biological contexts—foundation for symbiotaxis

B shows distinctive behavior in biological systems through the formation of reversible borate esters with hydroxyl-rich substrates and context-dependent interactions with phosphate esters. In aqueous solution, B is present mainly as B(OH)3 (trigonal, sp2) and, at higher pH, as B(OH)4 (tetrahedral, sp3). Interconversion between these forms underlies B ability to complex vicinal diols and stabilize furanosyl intermediates (Sivaev and Bregadze, 2014; Hunter et al., 2019; Nori et al., 2022). Because borate esters form and dissociate rapidly at physiological ionic strength, B can stabilize ribose and related furanoses against degradation (Ricardo et al., 2004; Scorei and Cimpoiaşu, 2006; Scorei, 2012), extend the lifetimes of phosphate esters in the presence of adjacent diols (Kim et al., 2016), and facilitate condensation reactions under wet–dry or freeze–thaw cycles (Franco et al., 2019; Franco and da Silva, 2021).

Complex formation is strongly influenced by geometry and pH. B forms five- and six-membered cyclic esters with 1,2-/1,3-diols; multidentate polyols and catechols generally show higher apparent affinities than many aldohexoses, and ketoses often bind more strongly than aldoses (Rietjens and Steenbergen, 2005). Functionally, B does not interact equally with all carbohydrates: it tends to favor furanosyl conformations and stabilize chemically fragile sugar intermediates. These trends help explain why diet-derived polyols and polyphenols efficiently bind B in the intestinal lumen and contribute to MABCs formation (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Qualitative affinity of boron for different diol classes and biological relevance.

Although B is not a classical phosphate ligand, neighboring diols permit cooperative interactions that decrease the hydrolytic lability of phosphate mono- and diesters. Mixed borate–diol–phosphate adducts and associated hydrogen-bond networks can limit water access to phosphorus centers, increasing the activation barrier for spontaneous cleavage (Aydoğmuş et al., 2014; Hirakawa et al., 2022). Because borate esters are reversible, this protective effect is conditional and sensitive to pH, ionic strength, ligand geometry, and divalent cations (Mg2+, Ca2+) (Van Duin et al., 1985).

Several biological systems illustrate that this chemistry is compatible with living matrices. In plants, borate–diol crosslinks in polysaccharides such as rhamnogalacturonan II contribute to wall mechanics and integrity (González-Fontes et al., 2008; Brini and Landi, 2022). In microorganisms, a furanosyl borate diester (AI-2B) is recognized by LuxP in some Vibrio spp., indicating that borate complexation can be integral to QS signal identity (Chen et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2025). B-containing drugs (e.g., bortezomib, tavaborole) further show that reversible B chemistry can be harnessed in controlled biological contexts (Das et al., 2022; Soriano-Ursúa et al., 2024).

Within this context, PAB consists of small, diffusible species absorbed in the proximal intestine and distributed systemically, whereas MABCs arise locally when diet-derived ligands form poorly absorbed conjugates that persist at the mucosal surface and release B by reversible exchange (Biţă et al., 2024, 2025). The balance between PAB and MABCs shaped by dietary ligands, luminal pH and ionic milieu, transit time, and mucosal adsorption—likely contributes to QS-relevant speciation and to the structure and resilience of microbial communities.

3 AI-2 and the borate-complexed signal (AI-2B)—a model for symbiotaxis

AI-2 is generated by LuxS-mediated conversion of S-ribosylhomocysteine to 4,5-dihydroxypentane-2,3-dione (DPD), a reactive intermediate that spontaneously rearranges in aqueous solution into a pool of interconverting furanosyl isomers. AI-2 thus denotes an ensemble of DPD-derived species rather than a single molecule. DPD itself can be viewed both as a QS intermediate and as an inevitable product of the activated methyl cycle (Holmes et al., 2009).

Under favorable conditions, one subset of this ensemble forms a furanosyl borate diester (AI-2B). In marine Vibrio spp. that express LuxP-type receptors and inhabit borate-rich seawater, this B-containing form (often described as (2S,4S)-2-methyl-2,3,3,4-tetrahydroxytetrahydrofuran (S-THMF)–borate) is the best characterized signal: B contributes to stabilization of the ligand conformation and to high-affinity receptor recognition. By contrast, in many enteric bacteria and other lineages, receptors such as LsrB and more recently identified dCache1- and gammaproteobacterial periplasmic sensor (GAPES1)-domain proteins appear to respond predominantly to unboronated AI-2 isomers (Frando et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025a,b).

Recent large-scale genomic and metatranscriptomic analyses of the human gut microbiome (Fan et al., 2025) support this view: LuxS is widely distributed, but most gut-associated lineages encode receptors that are, to current knowledge, specific for unboronated AI-2 (LsrB, dCache1, GAPES1), whereas B-dependent LuxP systems are essentially absent from typical intestinal consortia. These data reinforce the distinction between a chemically broad AI-2 ensemble and the more restricted, context-dependent AI-2B species.

Importantly, Fan et al. (2025) also report that unhealthy states are associated with a shift toward Enterobacteriaceae expressing AI-2 receptors, indicating that high AI-2 signaling can accompany dysbiosis rather than symbiosis. In the framework developed here, such findings are consistent with a scenario in which unboronated AI-2 dominates in low-B or dysbiotic contexts, whereas AI-2B formation would require adequate luminal B availability and appropriate speciation.

Thus, while the chemical requirement for B in AI-2B formation is well established in specific LuxP/seawater contexts, the prevalence and quantitative contribution of AI-2B, relative to unboronated AI-2, across taxa and niches remain incompletely defined and are likely to be context-dependent rather than universal. In the gut lumen, where B levels, pH, and ligand composition differ markedly from seawater, unboronated AI-2 forms are expected to predominate, with AI-2B representing one possible, but not obligatory, state within the broader DPD-derived ensemble. Even in systems where receptors do not require B, B may still influence signaling indirectly by stabilizing selected DPD-derived species and modestly extending their lifetime and effective diffusion distance.

4 Microbiota-accessible boron complexes: a two-compartment framework

Not all ingested B is functionally equivalent. PAB refers to freely diffusible B(OH)3/B(OH)4 absorbed in the upper intestine and distributed via the circulation (Hunter et al., 2019). In contrast, MABCs are luminal, reversible borate–diol conjugates formed in situ with dietary ligands such as polyols, CGAs and other polyphenols, and fructans/inulins (Biţă et al., 2023a, 2024, 2025). Because these complexes are poorly absorbed, they tend to concentrate at the mucus–epithelium interface. This partitioning into a systemic, diffuse pool (PAB) and a local, luminal pool (MABCs) helps determine where QS-relevant chemistry occurs, largely independent of total elemental intake (Table 1).

Within the lumen, BA forms several classes of reversible esters. Chlorogenoborates derived from CGAs in coffee and fruits are stable at physiological pH but remain sensitive to pH, ionic strength, and enzymatic activity (Biţă et al., 2023a). Fructoborates and other polyol–borates (e.g., sorbitol- or mannitol-based complexes, fructan/inulin adducts) bind B via multiple cis-diols, lowering dissociation rates and favoring retention (Hunter et al., 2019). Engineered nutraceuticals such as calcium fructoborate (CaFB) add further motifs expected to behave as MABCs reservoirs (Biţă et al., 2022). These species can interact with O-glycan-rich mucus, which presents clustered cis-diols, creating regions where B is held near the epithelium and released gradually by reversible exchange.

By increasing the local lifetime and concentration of intermediates that participate in AI-2/AI-2B signaling, MABCs are expected to favor taxa that respond to these cues (e.g., LuxP-type lineages) and thereby act as ecological filters that bias communities toward states compatible with an intact epithelial barrier. At the same time, although complexation chemistry is well documented, direct in vivo evidence that MABC-derived B specifically drives AI-2B formation and QS coherence is still lacking. Addressing this gap will require speciation-aware analytical strategies, including 11B–nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to resolve coordination environments and targeted liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) for AI-2/AI-2B and DPD isomers in promptly stabilized samples.

5 Conceptual framework: boron symbiotaxis

Several strands of evidence—the reversible chemistry of B with diols and phosphate esters, the exemplar of AI-2B in LuxP systems, and the local generation of MABCs in the gut—support the idea that B can influence when and where QS signals persist. For clarity, these processes can be grouped into three interrelated functions: (i) stabilize—B helps stabilize chemically labile intermediates through reversible borate esters or mixed borate–phosphate assemblies (when AI-2B forms, B becomes an integral part of the signal itself); (ii) localize—B is concentrated through MABCs that accumulate at the mucus–epithelium interface and release B gradually, in contrast to the more diffuse distribution of PAB; and (iii) orient—the combination of increased persistence and localized availability can modulate microbial interactions, influencing biofilm architecture, resource sharing, and colonization behavior, effects that the host perceives through changes in barrier function and immune tone.

We do not propose “boron symbiotaxis” as a new physiological program, but as a testable set of mechanistic predictions grounded in established B chemistry and known QS architectures. The extent of B’s effects is expected to depend on local pH, buffer capacity, ionic strength, Ca2+/Mg2+, availability of ligands (polyols, CGAs, other polyphenols), and ecological–physiological variables such as mucus turnover, transit, receptor distribution, and inflammation or permeability. Chemical speciation, rather than total B intake, should therefore correlate most closely with QS coherence.

Dietary contexts that favor MABC formation should enhance local AI-2/AI-2B signaling relative to PAB-dominated conditions at equivalent elemental doses (Biţă et al., 2025). Receptor-based reporter assays are expected to track luminal speciation, and a practical MABCs/PAB index may help compare interventions. Host outcomes linked to barrier integrity and immune tone are likewise predicted to vary with these chemical parameters. A schematic summary of the stabilize–localize–orient framework and its relationship to PAB and MABCs is provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating a process in three steps:

Figure 1. Overview of PAB (freely diffusible B(OH)3/B(OH)4) and MABCs (luminal borate–diol complexes formed with dietary ligands) as distinct contributors to B speciation at the mucosal interface. The stabilize–localize–orient triad summarizes three mechanistic hypotheses: (i) Stabilization of selected DPD-derived intermediates, (ii) localization of B through MABC retention in mucus, and (iii) orientation of QS-relevant interactions. This schematic illustrates how diet-driven B speciation may influence AI-2/AI-2B dynamics.

6 Discussion

The contribution of B to AI-2 signaling is likely to be conditional rather than universal. In some lineages that express LuxP-type receptors and inhabit neutral to mildly alkaline niches environments, a furanosyl borate diester (AI-2B) appears necessary for optimal recognition. In many other bacteria, however, receptors respond to non-boronated AI-2 isomers. Mapping this diversity will require receptor-based reporter assays across taxa, combined with environmental metadata (pH, buffer capacity, ionic strength, divalent cations) that determine whether borate ester formation stabilizes a recognition-competent geometry or remains incidental.

Importantly, enhanced AI-2 activity should not be equated with beneficial or cooperative outcomes. Recent work on AI-2 signaling shows that expression of LuxS and AI-2-responsive receptors does not consistently correlate with improved host status and may, in some settings, accompany dysbiosis or virulence (Fan et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025b; Zhang et al., 2025). We therefore treat AI-2 as a communication channel whose functional outcome depends on context, not as an inherently “symbiotic” signal. Within this framing, B is positioned as a modifier of signal chemistry rather than a determinant of whether QS promotes or undermines host–microbiome balance.

Functional QS assays are essential to bridge chemistry and biology. Reporter strains that differentially sense boronated versus non-boronated AI-2—such as LuxP/LuxQ-based Vibrio harveyi systems, LsrB-dependent enteric bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella), and dCache1- or GAPES1-domain constructs in Pseudomonas—can be exposed to controlled gradients of B speciation, from simple BA to defined MABCs. Quantifying AI-2/AI-2B distributions by LC–MS and 11B–NMR under these conditions will allow direct tests of whether dietary-like B environments generate measurable differences in QS output.

Diet and gut ecology provide a tractable axis of variation. Diets rich in polyols and polyphenols (e.g., CGAs from coffee and fruits, fructans/inulins, sugar alcohols) are expected to favor MABCs-dominated environments, whereas highly-processed patterns may favor a more PAB-dominated state. Transit time and short-chain fatty acid production, which lower luminal pH, further modulate speciation along the tract. These gradients can serve as “experiments of opportunity” when combined with standardized chemical analytics and receptor-based assays.

Potential risks and adverse scenarios deserve explicit consideration. Although the stabilize–localize–orient triad may enhance communication fidelity in many commensal communities, increased QS coherence is not universally protective. Several pathogens—including Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Klebsiella, and certain Enterobacteriaceae—use AI-2 or AI-2-like cues to coordinate virulence, biofilm maturation, or antimicrobial tolerance. In such contexts, prolonged lifetime or enhanced clarity of AI-2 intermediates could, in principle, sustain or amplify undesirable behaviors. Controlled assays should therefore include commensal and opportunistic strains, matched gradients of B speciation, readouts for virulence and biofilm structure, and defined countermeasures such as pH modulation, ligand dilution, or transient inhibition of QS pathways.

For translational work, pragmatic intervention studies could compare MABCs-rich formulations (e.g., CaFB or chlorogenoborate-containing complexes) with BA at matched elemental B. Such trials would combine chemical endpoints (11B–NMR speciation, AI-2/AI-2B by LC–MS) with biological endpoints (Lux-based reporter assays, barrier-related markers such as zonulin, and inflammatory or metabolic panels), alongside diet records and safety monitoring.

In summary, the symbiotaxis framework proposes that boron can influence QS dynamics by stabilizing selected intermediates (and, in some lineages, by forming part of the AI-2B signal molecule), by shaping local speciation via MABCs at the mucus–epithelium interface, and by affecting microbial community states linked to barrier integrity and immune tone. These ideas are advanced not as established mechanisms, but as a coherent set of hypotheses. Demonstrating a reproducible chain from diet, B speciation, to QS readouts and host phenotypes will be essential to determine when and to what extent B can be used to modulate microbiome resilience and human health, and to confirm or refute the proposed concept of “boron symbiotaxis.”

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

AP: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Conceptualization. AB: Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft. IS: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Writing – original draft. DG: Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft. GM: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The article processing charge was funded by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT version GPT-4o (OpenAI) in the writing process, in order to improve the readability and language of their own writing. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

AI-2, Autoinducer-2; AI-2B, Autoinducer-2–borate; B, Boron; BA, Boric acid; CaFB, Calcium fructoborate; CGAs, Chlorogenic acids; DPD, 4,5-Dihydroxypentane-2,3-dione; LC–MS, Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; MABCs, Microbiota-accessible boron complexes; NMR, Nuclear magnetic resonance; PAB, Plasma-accessible boron; QS, Quorum sensing; SCFAs, Short-chain fatty acids.

References

Aydoğmuş, N., Köse, D. A., Beckett, M. A., and Karan, B. (2014). Organic biomolecules bind to phosphate through borate linkages in aqueous solutions. Turk. J. Chem. 38, 617–628. doi: 10.3906/kim-1309-55

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bassler, B. L. (1999). How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 582–587. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(99)00025-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Biţă, A., Scorei, I. R., Bălşeanu, T. A., Ciocîlteu, M. V., Bejenaru, C., Radu, A., et al. (2022). New insights into boron essentiality in humans and animals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:9147. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169147,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Biţă, A., Scorei, I. R., Mogoşanu, G. D., Bejenaru, L. E., Biţă, C. E., Dinescu, V. C., et al. (2024). Naturally occurring microbiota-accessible borates: a focused minireview. Inorganics 12:308. doi: 10.3390/inorganics12120308

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Biţă, A., Scorei, I. R., Rangavajla, N., Bejenaru, L. E., Rău, G., Bejenaru, C., et al. (2023). Diester chlorogenoborate complex: a new naturally occurring boron-containing compound. Inorganics 11:112. doi: 10.3390/inorganics11030112

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Biţă, A., Scorei, I. R., Soriano-Ursúa, M. A., Mogoşanu, G. D., Belu, I., Ciocîlteu, M. V., et al. (2025). Microbiota-accessible borates as novel and emerging prebiotics for healthy longevity: current research trends and perspectives. Pharmaceuticals 18:766. doi: 10.3390/ph18060766,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Biţă, C. E., Scorei, I. R., Vreju, A. F., Muşetescu, A. E., Mogoşanu, G. D., Biţă, A., et al. (2023b). Microbiota-accessible boron-containing compounds in complex regional pain syndrome. Medicina 59:1965. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111965,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brini, F., and Landi, M. (2022). “Chapter 13 – boron, hormones and secondary metabolites in plants: a molecular point of view” in Boron in plants and agriculture: exploring the physiology of boron and its impact on plant growth. eds. T. Aftab, M. Landi, I. E. Papadakis, F. Araniti, and P. H. Brown (London, UK: Academic Press–Elsevier), 271–291.

Google Scholar

Chen, X., Schauder, S., Potier, N., Van Dorsselaer, A., Pelczer, I., Bassler, B. L., et al. (2002). Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature 415, 545–549. doi: 10.1038/415545a,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chigozie, V. U., Saki, M., and Esimone, C. O. (2025). Molecular structural arrangement in quorum sensing and bacterial metabolic production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41:71. doi: 10.1007/s11274-025-04280-3,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Das, B. C., Nandwana, N. K., Das, S., Nandwana, V., Shareef, M. A., Das, Y., et al. (2022). Boron chemicals in drug discovery and development: synthesis and medicinal perspective. Molecules 27:2615. doi: 10.3390/molecules27092615,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, Q., Sun, H., Lin, X., Yang, W., Shen, X., and Zhang, L. (2025). Autoinducer-2-mediated communication network within human gut microbiota. ISME J. 19:wraf204. doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wraf204,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Franco, A., Ascenso, J. R., Ilharco, L., Diogo, H. P., André, V., and da Silva, J. A. L. (2019). Ribose-borate esters as potential components for prebiological evolution. J. Mol. Struct. 1184, 281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.02.031

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Franco, A., and da Silva, J. A. L. (2021). Boron in prebiological evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 10458–10468. doi: 10.1002/anie.202010616,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Frando, A., Dandekar, A. A., and Chandler, J. R. (2025). Better together: reciprocal activation of quorum sensing circuits enhances bacterial communication. PLoS Biol. 23:e3003347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003347,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

González-Fontes, A., Rexach, J., Navarro-Gochicoa, M. T., Herrera-Rodríguez, M. B., Beato, V. M., Maldonado, J. M., et al. (2008). Is boron involved solely in structural roles in vascular plants? Plant Signal. Behav. 3, 24–26. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.1.4812,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirakawa, Y., Kakegawa, T., and Furukawa, Y. (2022). Borate-guided ribose phosphorylation for prebiotic nucleotide synthesis. Sci. Rep. 12:11828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15753-y,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Holmes, K., Tavender, T. J., Winzer, K., Wells, J. M., and Hardie, K. R. (2009). AI-2 does not function as a quorum sensing molecule in Campylobacter jejuni during exponential growth in vitro. BMC Microbiol. 9:214. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-214,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hunter, J. M., Nemzer, B. V., Rangavajla, N., Biţă, A., Rogoveanu, O. C., Neamţu, J., et al. (2019). The fructoborates: part of a family of naturally occurring sugar–borate complexes—biochemistry, physiology, and impact on human health: a review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 188, 11–25. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1550-4,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H.-J., Furukawa, Y., Kakegawa, T., Bita, A., Scorei, R., and Benner, S. A. (2016). Evaporite borate-containing mineral ensembles make phosphate available and regiospecifically phosphorylate ribonucleosides: borate as a multifaceted problem solver in prebiotic chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 15816–15820. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, D., Lu, Y., Li, Z., Pang, X., and Gao, X. (2025a). Quorum sensing: not just a bridge between bacteria. MicrobiologyOpen 14:e70016. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.70016,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, D., Zhang, W., Zhu, L., Gong, J., Huang, Y., Li, Z., et al. (2025b). Autoinducer-2 quorum sensing is an active universal signaling system in sociomicrobiology. J. Basic Microbiol. 65:e70024. doi: 10.1002/jobm.70024,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nori, V., Pesciaioli, F., Sinibaldi, A., Giorgianni, G., and Carlone, A. (2022). Boron-based Lewis acid catalysis: challenges and perspectives. Catalysts 12:5. doi: 10.3390/catal12010005,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ricardo, A., Carrigan, M. A., Olcott, A. N., and Benner, S. A. (2004). Borate minerals stabilize ribose. Science 303:196. doi: 10.1126/science.1092464,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rietjens, M., and Steenbergen, P. A. (2005). Crosslinking mechanism of boric acid with diols revisited. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 1162–1174. doi: 10.1002/ejic.200400674

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Scorei, R. (2012). Is boron a prebiotic element? A mini-review of the essentiality of boron for the appearance of life on earth. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 42, 3–17. doi: 10.1007/s11084-012-9269-2,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Scorei, R., and Cimpoiaşu, V. M. (2006). Boron enhances the thermostability of carbohydrates. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 36, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11084-005-0562-1,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sivaev, I. B., and Bregadze, V. I. (2014). Lewis acidity of boron compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 270–271, 75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.10.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Soriano-Ursúa, M. A., Cordova-Chávez, R. I., Farfan-García, E. D., and Kabalka, G. (2024). Boron-containing compounds as labels, drugs, and theranostic agents for diabetes and its complications. World J. Diabetes 15, 1060–1069. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i6.1060,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Duin, M., Peters, J. A., Kieboom, A. P. G., and Van Bekkum, H. (1985). Studies on borate esters II: structure and stability of borate esters of polyhydroxycarboxylates and related polyols in aqueous alkaline media as studied by 11B NMR. Tetrahedron 41, 3411–3421. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96693-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Zhao, W., Yang, W., Zhang, H., Qian, X., Sun, K., et al. (2025). Autoinducer-2 enhances the defense of Vibrio furnissii against oxidative stress and DNA damage by modulation of c-di-GMP signaling via a two-component system. MBio 16:e0292224. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02922-24,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: boron symbiotaxis, quorum sensing, autoinducer-2–borate, microbiota-accessible boron complexes, host–microbiome communication

Citation: Pîrvu AS, Biţă A, Scorei IR, Gheonea DI and Mogoşanu GD (2026) Boron symbiotaxis: a new concept in host–microbiome communication. Front. Microbiol. 16:1719918. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1719918

Received: 07 October 2025; Revised: 22 November 2025; Accepted: 16 December 2025;
Published: 06 January 2026.

Edited by:

Acacio Aparecido Navarrete, Brazil University, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Luis Angel Chicoma Rojas, São Paulo State University, Brazil

Copyright © 2026 Pîrvu, Biţă, Scorei, Gheonea and Mogoşanu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ion Romulus Scorei, cm9tdWx1cy5zY29yZWlAbmF0dXJhbHJlc2VhcmNoLnJv

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.