Yohannes Gelaye1,2
Huaiyong Luo1,3*- 1Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Wuhan, China
- 2Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Amhara, Ethiopia
- 3National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, China
Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is a major constraint to global peanut production, leading to serious yield and economic losses, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. The disease reduces plant vigor, pod development, and overall productivity, posing a significant threat to food security and farmer income. Conventional control methods, including crop rotation, resistant varieties, soil amendments and chemicals, remain inconsistent and often provide limited long-term effectiveness. This inconsistency is due to the pathogen’s broad host range, prolonged soil survival, and high genetic adaptability, which enable rapid spread and persistence. These challenges indicate the need for sustainable alternatives that are effective and environmentally sound. Nanoparticle-based antimicrobial delivery systems have emerged as a promising strategy because of their precision targeting, improved stability, enhanced bioavailability, and controlled release of active agents. Key nanomaterial design parameters, including composition, size, surface functionalization, and carrier efficiency, critically influence antimicrobial activity against R. solanacearum. These characteristics affect interactions with bacterial cells and plant tissues. Major mechanisms of pathogen suppression involve membrane disruption, metabolic interference, oxidative stress generation, and induction of plant systemic resistance. Environmental aspects, such as nanoparticle fate, bioaccumulation, persistence in soil, and ecotoxicological risks, must also be considered to ensure ecological safety and sustainability. Integrating nanotechnology with plant breeding and biocontrol strategies can promote resilient and eco-friendly peanut production. Nanoparticle-enabled disease management offers a transformative approach for mitigating bacterial wilt while strengthening sustainable crop protection systems worldwide. Policy support and responsible innovation will accelerate the safe adoption of these technologies in the field.
Highlights
• Bacterial wilt severely constrains sustainable peanut production worldwide.
• NPs enable targeted and efficient suppression of R. solanacearum.
• Metal and silica NPs disrupt pathogens and enhance host immunity.
• Silica NPs prime antioxidant systems and systemic acquired resistance.
• Nano-delivery systems improve antimicrobial stability, precision, and efficacy.
1 Introduction
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is one of the most significant oilseed and legume crops worldwide, serving as a vital source of edible oil, high-quality protein, and essential micronutrients (Arya et al., 2016; Bonku and Yu, 2020). Its cultivation supports millions of smallholder farmers, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, Africa, and South America (Raza et al., 2024). Despite its economic and nutritional importance, peanut production faces severe challenges from bacterial wilt, a soil-borne vascular disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (R. solanacearum) (Yang et al., 2022). The pathogen invades plant roots and colonizes the vascular system, leading to rapid wilting and eventual plant death. In heavily infested fields, yield losses can exceed 80%, posing a critical threat to food security and farmer livelihoods (Pramesti and Umali, 2023).
Ralstonia solanacearum is a genetically diverse species composed of multiple races that infect distinct crops and cause severe yield losses worldwide. Race 1 has a broad host range and induces bacterial wilt in solanaceous crops such as tomato, potato, pepper, and peanut, often resulting in losses exceeding 70% (Yahiaoui et al., 2017). Whereas Race 2 causes Moko disease in banana and plantain, Race 3 is responsible for brown rot of potato and tomato in cooler regions, and Race 4 primarily affects ginger, leading to rhizome rot and substantial production decline. The pathogen’s vascular colonization and soil persistence limit the effectiveness of conventional control measures (Pardo et al., 2019; Champoiseau et al., 2009). Recent evidence indicates that Nanoparticles (NPs)-based strategies can effectively suppress R. solanacearum by enhancing antimicrobial delivery, disrupting bacterial cells, and activating plant defense responses (Cheng et al., 2020; Dilbar et al., 2023). Metal and metal-oxide NPs, including silver, zinc oxide, copper oxide, and silica, have shown promising disease-reduction effects in crops such as tomato, potato, ginger, and peanut, indicating the potential of nanotechnology as a versatile and innovative approach for mitigating R. solanacearum–induced crop losses (El-Lakkany et al., 2025; Khan et al., 2021).
In addition to direct antimicrobial effects, silica (SiO₂) NPs act as defense elicitors by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), thereby mitigating pathogen-induced oxidative stress (Wang et al., 2022; Li et al., 2025). SiO₂ NP application also elevates salicylic acid (SA) levels and upregulates defense-related genes, leading to the activation of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) (Deng et al., 2024). Hence, this immune-priming capacity states the dual role of NPs in combining pathogen suppression with host defense reinforcement against R. solanacearum.
Traditional management strategies for bacterial wilt such as crop rotation, the use of resistant cultivars, soil solarization, and chemical bactericides have shown inconsistent and often unsatisfactory outcomes (Mehan et al., 1992; Bahmani et al., 2021). This ineffectiveness arises from the remarkable adaptability of R. solanacearum, its wide host range, and its ability to persist in soil and water for extended periods. Moreover, the indiscriminate use of chemical agents contributes to environmental contamination, microbial resistance, and reduced soil health, thereby undermining long-term disease management efforts (Muñoz-Bautista et al., 2025). Consequently, the search for innovative, effective, and environmentally sustainable solutions has become an urgent priority in peanut disease management research.
In recent years, nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative tool in agricultural disease control. NPs possess unique physicochemical properties such as high surface area, tunable reactivity, and controlled release potential that enhance the delivery and efficacy of antimicrobial agents (Nedyalkova et al., 2025). Hence, when used for plant protection, NPs can facilitate targeted delivery to infection sites, improve the stability of active compounds, and minimize non-target effects. Several studies have demonstrated that metal and metal oxide NPs, polymer-based nanocarriers, and biogenic NPs exhibit significant antimicrobial activity against plant pathogens, including R. solanacearum (El-Lakkany et al., 2025). These developments open new avenues for designing efficient NP-mediated strategies for controlling bacterial wilt in peanuts. Therefore, this critical review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current progress, underlying mechanisms, and future prospects of NP-based antimicrobial delivery systems for the effective management of bacterial wilt in peanut.
2 Design and functionalization of NPs for targeted delivery
NP-based antimicrobial delivery systems have attracted growing attention as innovative tools for plant disease management, particularly for challenging soil-borne pathogens such as R. solanacearum. Varieties of NP types have been investigated for their antimicrobial potential, each offering distinct physicochemical and biological advantages (Wassie and Yemata, 2025; Spirescu et al., 2021). Metallic NPs such as silver (Ag), copper oxide (CuO), and zinc oxide (ZnO) exhibit strong bactericidal properties through mechanisms including membrane disruption, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and interference with cellular enzymes (Franco et al., 2022; Parvin et al., 2025). Polymeric and lipid-based NPs, on the other hand, serve as biocompatible carriers capable of encapsulating both hydrophilic and hydrophobic antimicrobials, ensuring controlled release and enhanced bioavailability (Bhardwaj and Jangde, 2023; Lu et al., 2021). Silica and chitosan NPs contribute additional functionalities such that silica provides structural stability and a porous matrix for gradual release, while chitosan exhibits inherent antimicrobial and plant growth-promoting properties, making it particularly valuable for sustainable crop protection (Benkő et al., 2025; Ingle et al., 2022).
Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are characterized by their high porosity, tunable pore sizes, large surface areas, and adjustable metal ligand chemistry, making them particularly suitable for controlled antimicrobial delivery. Recent studies demonstrate that MOFs, especially those based on metals such as zinc, copper, and iron, exhibit intrinsic antibacterial activity or can serve as efficient carriers for antimicrobial agents, including antibiotics, metal ions, and plant-derived bioactives (Kermanshahi and Akhbari, 2024). Their sustained-release behavior and responsiveness to environmental stimuli (e.g., pH or redox conditions) are particularly relevant for soil-borne pathogens such as R. solanacearum, which colonize the rhizosphere and vascular tissues.
Moreover, MOFs have been shown to reduce premature degradation of antimicrobial compounds in soil environments while enhancing localized delivery near infection sites (Livesey et al., 2023). Their potential to minimize off-target toxicity further supports their relevance in sustainable plant disease management.
Functionalization of NP surfaces represents a critical advancement in enhancing their efficiency and specificity. Surface modifications with agents such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), biopolymers, or plant-derived ligands not only improve NP stability under environmental conditions but also facilitate targeted interaction with plant root tissues and vascular systems (Shi et al., 2021; Kaymaz et al., 2023). These functional coatings can reduce aggregation, prolong NP persistence in soil, and improve translocation within plant tissues. Moreover, bio-inspired functionalization using natural compounds from peanut or associated rhizosphere microorganisms offers opportunities to align nanotechnology with ecological compatibility, potentially reducing phytotoxicity and enhancing selective uptake (Xu et al., 2021; Leng et al., 2023).
Equally important are controlled and targeted release mechanisms, which are being increasingly incorporated into NP formulations. Smart delivery systems that respond to specific environmental cues such as pH changes, pathogen-secreted metabolites, or enzymatic activity enable localized and on-demand release of antimicrobials at infection sites (Li et al., 2022). This precision delivery reduces the amount of active agent required, minimizes off-target effects, and enhances disease suppression efficiency. Moreover, the integration of responsive materials into NP systems signifies a significant step toward precision agriculture, where antimicrobial interventions can be both effective and environmentally sustainable (Zaman et al., 2025; Yadav et al., 2025).
Despite these promising developments, a major limitation remains the scarcity of peanut-specific studies. Most existing research on NP-mediated management of R. solanacearum has been conducted in solanaceous crops like tomato and potato, with limited direct application to peanut. Given the unique physiology of peanut roots, nodulation patterns, and soil-plant-microbe interactions, extrapolating results from other crops may not yield reliable outcomes. Hence, there is a pressing need for peanut-centric studies that optimize NP-type, dosage, and delivery strategy, while evaluating long-term impacts on soil health and beneficial microbiota. In general, the framework links multiple nanoparticle types with peanut physiological and microbial systems to achieve targeted suppression of R. solanacearum (Figure 1). It also indicates how functionalized and smart nanocarriers enhance antimicrobial efficiency, promote root defense activation, and maintain rhizosphere ecological balance.
Figure 1. Nano-enabled framework for peanut Ralstonia solanacearum management.
3 Mechanisms of action beyond direct antimicrobial effects
NPs direct antimicrobial activity is primarily attributed to the release of bioactive metal ions, generation of ROS, and disruption of microbial cell structures (Liu et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2024). ROS production induces oxidative stress that damages nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids, ultimately leading to cell death (Redza-Dutordoir and Averill-Bates, 2016). Then, the nanoscale size of these particles facilitates intimate contact with microbial cells, enabling efficient pathogen inhibition even at low concentrations. This mechanism provides an advantage over conventional bactericides, which often fail due to reduced bioavailability.
Beyond direct toxicity, certain NPs also activate host defense responses, thereby strengthening the plant’s innate immunity (Masood et al., 2024). Si, ZnO, and CuO NPs have been shown to enhance the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, enhance antioxidant enzyme activity, and stimulate phenolic compound biosynthesis in plants (Verma et al., 2024; Essa et al., 2025). These physiological responses contribute to the reinforcement of cell walls and detoxification of ROS, creating a more resistant host environment against R. solanacearum infection. In peanut, such NP-induced priming could provide durable resistance by enabling the plant to respond more rapidly and effectively to pathogen attack (Deng et al., 2024; Kumar et al., 2025).
A further dimension of NP action involves modulation of the rhizosphere microbiome and by influencing microbial community composition and diversity; NPs can suppress pathogenic populations indirectly while favoring beneficial microorganisms such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas species (Zhang et al., 2024; de Moraes et al., 2021). This ecological rebalancing of the rhizosphere may enhance soil health and improve plant resilience. However, the long-term stability and reversibility of these microbial shifts remain insufficiently explored, particularly in peanut agroecosystems where nitrogen-fixing symbioses play a critical role in productivity.
From a critical perspective, the dual functionality of NPs as both direct antimicrobial agents and elicitors of plant immune responses represents a promising yet underexplored frontier in plant pathology (Carrillo-Lopez et al., 2024). Despite encouraging evidence from model and solanaceous crops, comprehensive molecular and transcriptomic analyses in peanut are still lacking. Thus, understanding the precise signaling pathways, gene networks, and metabolic responses involved in NP–plant–pathogen interactions is essential to optimize their use. The figure (Figure 2) depicts how NPs exert dual effects by directly killing R. solanacearum and activating peanut immune pathways. It also shows rhizosphere modulation that supports beneficial microbes and enhances soil health for sustainable resistance.
Figure 2. NP mechanisms in peanut Ralstonia solanacearum defense.
4 Pathogen biology and delivery challenges in vascular wilt systems
A central challenge in the control of bacterial wilt lies in the localization of R. solanacearum within the host plant. Once infection occurs, the pathogen rapidly colonizes the root cortex and invades the xylem vessels, leading to systemic spread and vascular blockage (Mori et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2020). This internal localization makes conventional and chemical treatments largely ineffective, as most antimicrobial agents cannot penetrate deep into vascular tissues where bacterial populations reside (Wang Z. et al., 2023). Achieving effective delivery of active compounds to these protected infection sites is, therefore, one of the most critical barriers to managing bacterial wilt in peanut.
Foliar-applied NPs can be absorbed through stomata or cuticular pathways and subsequently translocated via the phloem to other plant tissues, including roots (Seleiman et al., 2020).
Additionally, foliar delivery has been shown to stimulate systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR), enhancing the plant’s defensive capacity against root-infecting pathogens (Zhang et al., 2022). Nanocomposites containing micronutrients or antimicrobial agents may upregulate defense-related enzymes, phenolic compounds, and pathogenesis-related proteins, thereby reducing pathogen colonization even in belowground tissues (Noman et al., 2023).
Furthermore, foliar application minimizes direct soil exposure, potentially reducing environmental accumulation and non-target effects, making it an attractive complementary strategy to soil or seed-based delivery systems (Ding et al., 2023).
However, the transport and bioavailability of NPs within the soil–plant continuum are hindered by several physicochemical and biological factors (Gao et al., 2023). In soil, NPs tend to aggregate or adsorb onto organic matter and clay particles, significantly reducing their mobility and uptake by roots (He et al., 2019; Strekalovskaya et al., 2024). Once in contact with plant tissues, additional barriers such as the cell wall’s pore size and cuticular layers further restrict NP translocation to vascular tissues (Wu and Li, 2022). The term “cell wall pore size” refers to the effective size exclusion limit of the plant cell wall matrix, which is determined by the spacing between cellulose microfibrils and associated polysaccharides (Carpita et al., 1979). This pore size typically ranges from 5 to 20 nm, influencing the passive movement of NPs into the apoplast.
The term “endodermis Casparian” is a specialized root cell layer characterized by the Casparian strip, which regulates the apoplastic movement of water and solutes into the vascular system (Wang et al., 2019). Transport across the endodermis requires symplastic movement via membrane transporters or plasmodesmata. Hence, the combined effects of these barriers limit both the concentration and uniformity of NPs reaching R. solanacearum colonization sites, thus reducing antimicrobial efficacy.
Consequently, to overcome these limitations, researchers have proposed several strategic approaches for optimizing NP delivery. The use of ultra-small NPs (<20 nm) can enhance root penetration and systemic movement within plant tissues (Gao et al., 2023). For instance, root-targeted formulations, including hydrogels, nanoemulsions, and nanocomposite carriers, offer the advantage of localized and sustained NP release in the rhizosphere, aligning delivery with pathogen entry points (Davidson et al., 2013). Furthermore, synchronizing NP application with key stages of pathogen invasion such as initial root infection may further increase treatment effectiveness while minimizing resource waste and environmental exposure (Nile et al., 2022; Lee and Kasote, 2024). Thus, these strategies reflect an evolving emphasis on precision delivery and plant-compatible formulation design in nanotechnology-based plant protection.
However, despite these promising advances, a critical knowledge gap persists regarding the in vivo behavior and distribution of NPs within peanut tissues. Real-time tracking of NP movement, accumulation, and interaction within the vascular system remains largely unexplored. In addition, advanced imaging techniques such as confocal microscopy, synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence, and isotopic tracing should also be prioritized to elucidate NP transport dynamics. Overall, NPs face multiple soil and tissue barriers before reaching R. solanacearum infection sites in peanut vascular tissues. Ultra-small, root-targeted, and smartly timed NP formulations improve penetration, mobility, and antimicrobial precision (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Pathogen biology and NP delivery for managing peanut bacterial wilt.
5 Environmental fate and ecotoxicological considerations
While NP-based interventions hold promise for managing bacterial wilt, their long-term soil and ecosystem impacts require careful evaluation. Repeated application of NPs may inadvertently affect non-target soil microorganisms that are essential for nutrient cycling and plant health (Das et al., 2025). Symbiotic microbes such as Rhizobium spp., responsible for nitrogen fixation, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that enhance nutrient uptake, are particularly vulnerable to metallic NPs (Fan et al., 2014). Disruptions in these microbial communities can impair soil fertility, alter enzymatic activities related to carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and reduce the ecological resilience of peanut production systems (Wu et al., 2023). Hence, understanding the ecological thresholds of NP exposure is critical for ensuring that disease control does not compromise long-term soil health.
Another emerging concern is the bioaccumulation and residue formation of NPs in edible plant parts, particularly peanut kernels. Due to their small size and potential for systemic movement, certain NPs can translocate through plant tissues and accumulate in reproductive organs (Djanaguiraman et al., 2024; Rico et al., 2011). This raises legitimate food safety concerns, as chronic human or animal exposure to residual NPs could pose toxicological risks. The persistence and transformation of NPs in harvested products necessitate stringent monitoring and assessment frameworks before large-scale agricultural deployment (Atanda et al., 2025).
Current evidence indicates that NP accumulation in reproductive organs (flowers, fruits, seeds) is highly dependent on NP size, solubility, surface charge, and application route (Minello et al., 2025). Although some studies report limited translocation of ultra-small or highly mobile NPs to reproductive tissues, most engineered NPs tend to accumulate predominantly in roots, stems, and leaves.
More importantly, several investigations suggest that NPs larger than the size exclusion limits of vascular tissues show restricted movement into reproductive organs (Gao et al., 2023; Sembada and Lenggoro, 2024). This limited accumulation is often considered advantageous from a food safety perspective. However, the existing data remain fragmented, and systematic studies on NP fate during reproductive development are still scarce.
Moreover, environmental transformation processes can significantly alter NP behavior and toxicity in the agricultural environment (Islam, 2025). Upon entering to soil or water systems, NPs may undergo oxidation, dissolution, aggregation with organic and inorganic compounds (Haydar et al., 2025). These transformations can modify their surface chemistry, potentially reducing or enhancing their reactivity and toxicity (Figure 4). For instance, the dissolution of metal-based NPs may release ionic species with higher toxicity than the original particles, while complexation with humic substances could mitigate harmful effects (Islam, 2025).
Figure 4. Fate and transport of NPs in peanut agroecosystem and soil agrosystem.
From a critical standpoint, much of the current research on NP biosafety remains short-term and lacks ecological depth. Most studies emphasize acute toxicity under controlled conditions, often neglecting chronic, low-dose exposures and the intricate interactions among soil, peanut plants, and associated microbial communities (Muzammil et al., 2023; Wang Q. et al., 2023). These oversights hinder the development of comprehensive risk assessment models customized to legume-based systems, which differ significantly from cereals or solanaceous crops in their root structure and symbiotic relationships (Shahroz et al., 2024). Accordingly, establishing standardized, crop-specific risk assessment protocols encompassing both environmental and food safety dimensions is urgently needed to ensure that NP applications in peanut cultivation are both effective and ecologically sustainable (Atanda et al., 2025).
Phytotoxicity assessment is essential to distinguish antimicrobial efficacy from unintended plant damage and the key validation methods include morphological analyses: root length, shoot biomass, leaf area, and visual symptom scoring; physiological indicators: chlorophyll content, photosystem II efficiency (Fv/Fm), and gas exchange parameters; biochemical markers: ROS levels, antioxidant enzyme activity, and lipid peroxidation; histological and cytological assays: membrane integrity staining and tissue ultrastructure analysis, and microbial interaction assays: evaluating whether NPs selectively inhibit pathogens without disrupting beneficial plant-associated microbiota (Gao et al., 2023; Djanaguiraman et al., 2024; Tarrahi et al., 2021).
These integrated approaches are particularly important in plant–bacteria systems to ensure that disease suppression results from targeted antimicrobial action rather than generalized toxicity.
6 Formulation, scale-up, and field application challenges
Despite notable laboratory successes, the translation of NP technologies into field-ready formulations faces several unresolved challenges (Figure 5). The figure indicates the interconnection between NP stability, green synthesis, dose optimization, and regulatory constraints in achieving effective and safe disease management. Ensuring NP stability under variable environmental conditions remains a major technical barrier, as particles are prone to agglomeration, oxidation, or premature degradation in soil matrices (Khanna et al., 2021). These issues compromise controlled release and reduce antimicrobial efficacy over time. To overcome such limitations, novel formulation strategies are focusing on biogenic synthesis routes utilizing plant extracts, microbial metabolites, or biodegradable polymers to produce NPs with inherent stability, uniform morphology, and eco-compatible surfaces (Patil and Chandrasekaran, 2020; Geszke-Moritz and Moritz, 2024). Such “green synthesis” approaches not only minimize the need for hazardous reducing agents but also lower production costs, thereby improving scalability and environmental safety (Osman et al., 2024).
Figure 5. Formulation, scale-up, and field application challenges.
NP dosages used for antimicrobial applications in plants typically range from 1 to 100 mg/L−1, depending on NP composition, size, surface functionalization, and plant species (Masood et al., 2024). Lower concentrations are generally sufficient due to the high surface reactivity and enhanced bioavailability of nanomaterials (Mgadi et al., 2024).
Phytotoxicity is closely linked to dose, exposure duration, and NP chemistry. At optimal concentrations, NPs can exert antimicrobial effects while maintaining cellular redox balance, membrane integrity, and photosynthetic efficiency in plants (Ghorbani et al., 2024). Surface modifications (e.g., polymer coatings or biogenic synthesis routes) further reduce toxicity by limiting excessive metal ion release or reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation (García-Torra et al., 2021).
Therefore, dose optimization is essential to ensure antimicrobial efficacy without impairing plant growth or physiology.
Also important are the regulatory and translational dimensions of NP adoption in peanut disease management. The absence of clearly defined regulatory frameworks for “nano-enabled pesticides” continues to impede commercialization and field deployment (Wei et al., 2025; Ullah et al., 2024). Current safety and efficacy testing protocols are also designed for conventional agrochemicals and fail to capture NP-specific behaviors such as bio-distribution (Eghbalinejad et al., 2024). This regulatory ambiguity, compounded by limited farmer awareness and inadequate technological infrastructure in developing regions, hinders adoption at scale (Gelaye, 2025). Critically, field-based validation across diverse peanut-growing environments remains scarce, resulting in a gap between experimental promise and practical feasibility.
7 Comparative evaluation and future directions
NP-mediated antimicrobial delivery offers clear advantages over conventional chemical sprays, including targeted action, longer persistence, and reduced environmental impact (Izuafa et al., 2025). However, field validation remains limited compared to biocontrol agents and resistant peanut cultivars, which have demonstrated consistent performance. Integrating NPs with biocontrol organisms (Pseudomonas, Bacillus) or resistant varieties could provide synergistic benefits, combining immediate pathogen suppression with durable and eco-friendly protection (Upadhayay et al., 2023).
Future innovations include multifunctional NPs combining antimicrobial, elicitor, and sensing roles, nano-biosensors for early pathogen detection, and CRISPR–nanocarrier systems for targeted resistance gene delivery (Figure 6). The lack of standardized evaluation metrics including dose, particle size, and toxicity endpoints hindering cross-study comparison and regulatory clarity are also a critical challenge. Consequently, addressing these gaps through unified testing, field validation, and interdisciplinary research will be key to translating nanotechnology into safe and effective strategies for sustainable peanut cultivation.
Figure 6. Comparative evaluation and future development of NP-mediated disease management in peanut.
8 Conclusion
In conclusion, this critical review discusses the potential of NP-based antimicrobial delivery as a precise and sustainable strategy for managing bacterial wilt in peanut. NPs offer controlled release, vascular targeting, and the ability to prime plant defenses, complementing conventional approaches such as resistant cultivars and biocontrol agents. However, challenges persist in fully understanding NP–plant–pathogen interactions, assessing environmental and food-safety risks, and scaling laboratory innovations to field conditions. Formulation stability, regulatory gaps, and limited agroecological validation further constrain practical adoption.
Future research should focus on mechanistic insights, eco-safety evaluations, and standardized field trials to optimize NP design and application. Integrating nanotechnology within holistic disease-management frameworks rather than using it as a standalone solution can enhance efficacy, reduce chemical inputs, and support sustainable peanut production.
Author contributions
YG: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. HL: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32341039, 32161143006 and 32171997), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2024AFA098), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-13), the Nanfan special project of CAAS (Grant No. YBXM2552), the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (Grant No. Y2025YC112), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Grant No. CAAS-ASTIP-2021-OCRI).
Acknowledgments
Figures were created using the Biorender.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Arya, S. S., Salve, A. R., and Chauhan, S. (2016). Peanuts as functional food: a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 53, 31–41. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-2007-9,
Atanda, S. A., Shaibu, R. O., and Agunbiade, F. O. (2025). Nanoparticles in agriculture: balancing food security and environmental sustainability. Discov. Agric. 3:26. doi: 10.1007/s44279-025-00159-x
Bahmani, K., Hasanzadeh, N., Harighi, B., and Marefat, A. (2021). Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from potato tissues and their effects as biological control agents against bacterial wilt. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 116:101692. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101692
Benkő, F., Kristó, K., and Sovány, T. (2025). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Pharmaceuticals 18. doi: 10.3390/ph18091392,
Bhardwaj, H., and Jangde, R. K. (2023). Current updated review on preparation of polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery and biomedical applications. Next Nanotechnol. 2:100013. doi: 10.1016/j.nxnano.2023.100013
Bonku, R., and Yu, J. (2020). Health aspects of peanuts as an outcome of its chemical composition. Food Sci. Human Wellness 9, 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2019.12.005
Carpita, N., Sabularse, D., Montezinos, D., and Delmer, D. P. (1979). Determination of the pore size of cell walls of living plant cells. Science 205, 1144–1147. doi: 10.1126/science.205.4411.1144,
Carrillo-Lopez, L. M., Villanueva-Verduzco, C., Villanueva-Sánchez, E., Fajardo-Franco, M. L., Aguilar-Tlatelpa, M., Ventura-Aguilar, R. I., et al. (2024). Nanomaterials for plant disease diagnosis and treatment: a review. Plants 13. doi: 10.3390/plants13182634,
Champoiseau, P. G., Jones, J. B., and Allen, C. (2009). Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2 causes tropical losses and temperate anxieties. Plant Health Prog. 10:35. doi: 10.1094/PHP-2009-0313-01-RV
Cheng, H.-J., Wang, H., and Zhang, J.-Z. (2020). Phytofabrication of silver nanoparticles using three flower extracts and their antibacterial activities against pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum strain YY06 of bacterial wilt. Front. Microbiol. 11:2110. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02110,
Das, D., Ingti, B., Jamatia, J. P., Ete, T., Khan, T., Kalita, J., et al. (2025). Soil microbial dynamics in response to the impact of nanoparticles on agricultural implications. Discov. Soil 2:58. doi: 10.1007/s44378-025-00087-8
Davidson, D. W., Verma, M. S., and Gu, F. X. (2013). Controlled root targeted delivery of fertilizer using an ionically crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel matrix. Springerplus 2:318. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-318,
de Moraes, A. C. P., Ribeiro, L. D. S., de Camargo, E. R., and Lacava, P. T. (2021). The potential of nanomaterials associated with plant growth-promoting bacteria in agriculture. 3 Biotech 11:318. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02870-0,
Deng, Q., Huang, S., Liu, H., Lu, Q., du, P., Li, H., et al. (2024). Silica nanoparticles conferring resistance to bacterial wilt in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Sci. Total Environ. 915:170112. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170112,
Dilbar, S., Sher, H., Ali, H., Ullah, R., Ali, A., and Ullah, Z. (2023). Antibacterial efficacy of green synthesized silver nanoparticles using Salvia nubicola extract against Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of vascular wilt of tomato. ACS Omega 8, 31155–31167. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03164,
Ding, Y., Zhao, W., Zhu, G., Wang, Q., Zhang, P., and Rui, Y. (2023). Recent trends in foliar Nanofertilizers: a review. Nanomaterials (Basel) 13:2906. doi: 10.3390/nano13212906,
Djanaguiraman, M., Anbazhagan, V., Dhankher, O. P., and Prasad, P. V. V. (2024). Uptake, translocation, toxicity, and impact of nanoparticles on plant physiological processes. Plants 13:3137. doi: 10.3390/plants13223137,
Eghbalinejad, M., Hofman, J., Kotouček, J., Grillo, R., Hochmanová Bílková, Z., Reiff, N., et al. (2024). Nano-enabled pesticides: a comprehensive toxicity assessment of tebuconazole nanoformulations with nematodes at single species and community level. Environ. Sci. Eur. 36:51. doi: 10.1186/s12302-024-00879-9
El-Lakkany, A. A., Balabel, N. M., Rageh, M. M., Hanafy, M. S., Nasr, N. F., and Moselhy, M. A. (2025). Antibacterial efficacy of iron oxide and silver nanoparticles against bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Sci. Rep. 15:32666. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-19871-1,
Essa, T. A., Fetyan, N. A., Salem, T. M., Rebouh, N. Y., Kishk, A., and Abdelfattah, M. H. (2025). Stimulation of resistance genes and antioxidant enzymes in lettuce by nano metal oxides against root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani. PLoS One 20:e0334506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334506,
Fan, R., Huang, Y. C., Grusak, M. A., Huang, C. P., and Sherrier, D. J. (2014). Effects of nano-TiO2 on the agronomically-relevant Rhizobium–legume symbiosis. Sci. Total Environ. 466-467, 503–512. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.032,
Franco, D., Calabrese, G., Guglielmino, S. P. P., and Conoci, S. (2022). Metal-based nanoparticles: antibacterial mechanisms and biomedical application. Microorganisms 10. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091778,
Gao, M., Chang, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., and Wang, T. (2023). Advances in transport and toxicity of nanoparticles in plants. J. Nanobiotechnol. 21:75. doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-01830-5,
García-Torra, V., Cano, A., Espina, M., Ettcheto, M., Camins, A., Barroso, E., et al. (2021). State of the art on toxicological mechanisms of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles and strategies to reduce toxicological risks. Toxics 9:195. doi: 10.3390/toxics9080195,
Gelaye, Y. (2025). Exploring the potential of agro-nanotechnology in African agriculture: a path to sustainable development-systematic review. Sci. World J. 2025:9073364. doi: 10.1155/tswj/9073364,
Geszke-Moritz, M., and Moritz, M. (2024). Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems: comprehensive overview, perspectives and challenges. Polymers 16:2536. doi: 10.3390/polym16172536,
Ghorbani, A., Emamverdian, A., Pehlivan, N., Zargar, M., Razavi, S. M., and Chen, M. (2024). Nano-enabled agrochemicals: mitigating heavy metal toxicity and enhancing crop adaptability for sustainable crop production. J. Nanobiotechnol. 22:91. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02371-1,
Haydar, M. S., Zuluaga, M. Y. A., Astolfi, S., Cesco, S., and Pii, Y. (2025). From synthesis to soil: transformations and impacts of nanoparticles in agroecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 1000:180374. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180374,
He, J., Wang, D., and Zhou, D. (2019). Transport and retention of silver nanoparticles in soil: effects of input concentration, particle size and surface coating. Sci. Total Environ. 648, 102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.136,
Ingle, P. U., Shende, S. S., Shingote, P. R., Mishra, S. S., Sarda, V., Wasule, D. L., et al. (2022). Chitosan nanoparticles (ChNPs): a versatile growth promoter in modern agricultural production. Heliyon 8:e11893. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11893,
Islam, S. (2025). Toxicity and transport of nanoparticles in agriculture: effects of size, coating, and aging. Front. Nanotechnol. 7:1622228. doi: 10.3389/fnano.2025.1622228
Izuafa, A., Chimbekujwo, K. I., Raji, R. O., Oyewole, O. A., Oyewale, R. O., and Abioye, O. P. (2025). Application of nanoparticles for targeted management of pests, pathogens and disease of plants. Plant Nano Biol. 13:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.plana.2025.100177
Jiang, H., Li, L., Li, Z., and Chu, X. (2024). Metal-based nanoparticles in antibacterial application in biomedical field: current development and potential mechanisms. Biomed. Microdevices 26:12. doi: 10.1007/s10544-023-00686-8,
Kaymaz, S. V., Nobar, H. M., Sarıgül, H., Soylukan, C., Akyüz, L., and Yüce, M. (2023). Nanomaterial surface modification toolkit: principles, components, recipes, and applications. Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 322:103035. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2023.103035,
Kermanshahi, P. K., and Akhbari, K. (2024). The antibacterial activity of three zeolitic-imidazolate frameworks and zinc oxide nanoparticles derived from them. RSC Adv. 14, 5601–5608.
Khan, R. A. A., Tang, Y., Naz, I., Alam, S. S., Wang, W., Ahmad, M., et al. (2021). Management of Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato using ZnO nanoparticles synthesized through Matricaria chamomilla. Plant Dis. 105, 3224–3230. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-20-1763-RE,
Khanna, K., Kohli, S. K., Handa, N., Kaur, H., Ohri, P., Bhardwaj, R., et al. (2021). Enthralling the impact of engineered nanoparticles on soil microbiome: a concentric approach towards environmental risks and cogitation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 222:112459. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112459,
Kumar, S., Suman, S., Muthukumar, M., Mishra, K., Bajpai, A., Tiwari, A. K., et al. (2025). Technical review on different metal nanoparticles and their formulations on growth, agronomic and economic traits of crop plants. Front. Nanotechnol. 7:1576582. doi: 10.3389/fnano.2025.1576582
Lee, J. H. J., and Kasote, D. M. (2024). Nano-priming for inducing salinity tolerance, disease resistance, yield attributes, and alleviating heavy metal toxicity in plants. Plants (Basel) 13. doi: 10.3390/plants13030446,
Leng, K., Liu, J., Li, G., Wang, P., Zhou, P., Sun, M., et al. (2023). The relationship between core rhizosphere taxa and peanut nodulation capacity under different cover crop amendments. Agronomy 13:311. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020311
Li, F., Hou, Y., Chen, L., and Qiu, Y. (2025). Advances in silica nanoparticles for agricultural applications and biosynthesis. Adv Biotechnol (Singap) 3:14. doi: 10.1007/s44307-025-00067-7,
Li, D., Tang, G., Yao, H., Zhu, Y., Shi, C., Fu, Q., et al. (2022). Formulation of pH-responsive PEGylated nanoparticles with high drug loading capacity and programmable drug release for enhanced antibacterial activity. Bioact. Mater 16, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.018,
Liu, L., Li, S., Zhu, W., Bao, Q., Liang, Y., Zhao, T., et al. (2024). Study on the mechanism of ROS-induced oxidative stress injury and the broad-spectrum antimicrobial performance of nickel ion-doped V6O13 powder. Sci. Rep. 14:22374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71959-2,
Livesey, T. C., Mahmoud, L. A. M., Katsikogianni, M. G., and Nayak, S. (2023). Metal–organic frameworks and their biodegradable composites for controlled delivery of antimicrobial drugs. Pharmaceutics 15:274. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010274,
Lu, H., Zhang, S., Wang, J., and Chen, Q. (2021). A review on polymer and lipid-based Nanocarriers and its application to Nano-Pharmaceutical and food-based systems. Front. Nutr. 8:783831. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.783831,
Masood, H. A., Qi, Y., Zahid, M. K., Li, Z., Ahmad, S., Lv, J.-M., et al. (2024). Recent advances in nano-enabled immunomodulation for enhancing plant resilience against phytopathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1445786,
Mehan, V., Nigam, S., and McDonald, D. (1992). “Management of bacterial wilt of groundnut using genetic resistance and cultural practices” in Conference or workshop item. Bacterial wilt, 1992 Oct 28–31, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 28–31.
Mgadi, K., Ndaba, B., Roopnarain, A., Rama, H., and Adeleke, R. (2024). Nanoparticle applications in agriculture: overview and response of plant-associated microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 15:1354440. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1354440,
Minello, L. V. P., Kuntzler, S. G., Berghahn, E., Dorneles, L. T., Ricachenevsky, F. K., and Sperotto, R. A. (2025). Nanotechnology-driven biofortification of Fe, Zn, and se in edible plants. J. Nanobiotechnol. 23:669. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03746-8,
Mori, Y., Inoue, K., Ikeda, K., Nakayashiki, H., Higashimoto, C., Ohnishi, K., et al. (2016). The vascular plant-pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum produces biofilms required for its virulence on the surfaces of tomato cells adjacent to intercellular spaces. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 890–902. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12335,
Muñoz-Bautista, J. M., Bernal-Mercado, A. T., Martínez-Cruz, O., Burgos-Hernández, A., López-Zavala, A. A., Ruiz-Cruz, S., et al. (2025). Environmental and health impacts of pesticides and nanotechnology as an alternative in agriculture. Agronomy 15:1878. doi: 10.3390/agronomy15081878
Muzammil, S., Ashraf, A., Siddique, M. H., Aslam, B., Rasul, I., Abbas, R., et al. (2023). A review on toxicity of nanomaterials in agriculture: current scenario and future prospects. Sci. Prog. 106:368504231221672. doi: 10.1177/00368504231221672,
Nedyalkova, M., Vecini, D. P., Paluch, A. S., and Lattuada, M. (2025). Harnessing antimicrobial peptide-functionalized nanoparticles: a perspective on experimental and computational strategies to combat antibiotic resistance. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27, 16284–16294. doi: 10.1039/d5cp01880c,
Nile, S. H., Thiruvengadam, M., Wang, Y., Samynathan, R., Shariati, M. A., Rebezov, M., et al. (2022). Nano-priming as emerging seed priming technology for sustainable agriculture-recent developments and future perspectives. J Nanobiotechnology 20:254. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01423-8,
Noman, M., Ahmed, T., Wang, J., Ijaz, M., Shahid, M., Islam, M. S., et al. (2023). Nano-enabled crop resilience against pathogens: potential, mechanisms and strategies. Crop Health 1:15. doi: 10.1007/s44297-023-00015-8
Osman, A. I., Zhang, Y., Farghali, M., Rashwan, A. K., Eltaweil, A. S., Abd El-Monaem, E. M., et al. (2024). Synthesis of green nanoparticles for energy, biomedical, environmental, agricultural, and food applications: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 22, 841–887. doi: 10.1007/s10311-023-01682-3
Pardo, J. M., López-Alvarez, D., Ceballos, G., Alvarez, E., and Cuellar, W. J. (2019). Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II, race 2 causing Moko disease and validation of genetic resistance observed in the hybrid plantain FHIA-21. Trop. Plant Pathol. 44, 371–379. doi: 10.1007/s40858-019-00282-3
Parvin, N., Joo, S. W., and Mandal, T. K. (2025). Nanomaterial-based strategies to combat antibiotic resistance: mechanisms and applications. Antibiotics 14:207. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14020207,
Patil, S., and Chandrasekaran, R. (2020). Biogenic nanoparticles: a comprehensive perspective in synthesis, characterization, application and its challenges. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 18:67. doi: 10.1186/s43141-020-00081-3,
Pramesti, S. M., and Umali, J. (2023). Peanut plants: identification and management of bacterial pathogens impacting yield. Assyfa J. Farm. Agric. 1, 33–42. doi: 10.61650/ajfa.v1i1.302
Raza, A., Chen, H., Zhang, C., Zhuang, Y., Sharif, Y., Cai, T., et al. (2024). Designing future peanut: the power of genomics-assisted breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 137:66. doi: 10.1007/s00122-024-04575-3,
Redza-Dutordoir, M., and Averill-Bates, D. A. (2016). Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochimi. Biophys. Acta 1863, 2977–2992. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.09.012,
Rico, C. M., Majumdar, S., Duarte-Gardea, M., Peralta-Videa, J. R., and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2011). Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 3485–3498. doi: 10.1021/jf104517j,
Seleiman, M. F., Almutairi, K. F., Alotaibi, M., Shami, A., Alhammad, B. A., and Battaglia, M. L. (2020). Nano-fertilization as an emerging fertilization technique: why can modern agriculture benefit from its use? Plants 10:2. doi: 10.3390/plants10010002,
Sembada, A. A., and Lenggoro, I. W. (2024). Transport of nanoparticles into plants and their detection methods. Nanomaterials (Basel) 14:131. doi: 10.3390/nano14020131,
Shahroz, M., Ashiq, M., Infal, M., Riaz, A., Chaudhry, Z., Hassan, M. N., et al. (2024). Nanoparticles mediated modulation of nitrogen fixation in legumes: a biochemical perspective. Glob Acad J Agri Biosci 6, 119–133. doi: 10.36348/gajab.2024.v06i05.003
Shi, L., Zhang, J., Zhao, M., Tang, S., Cheng, X., Zhang, W., et al. (2021). Effects of polyethylene glycol on the surface of nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Nanoscale 13, 10748–10764. doi: 10.1039/D1NR02065J,
Spirescu, V. A., Chircov, C., Grumezescu, A. M., and Andronescu, E. (2021). Polymeric nanoparticles for antimicrobial therapies: an up-to-date overview. Polymers 13. doi: 10.3390/polym13050724,
Strekalovskaya, E. I., Perfileva, A. I., and Krutovsky, K. V. (2024). Zinc oxide nanoparticles in the “soil–bacterial community–plant” system: impact on the stability of soil ecosystems. Agronomy 14:1588. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14071588
Tarrahi, R., Mahjouri, S., and Khataee, A. (2021). A review on in vivo and in vitro nanotoxicological studies in plants: a headlight for future targets. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 208:111697. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111697,
Ullah, Q., Fatima, F., Memon, S. U. R., Khan, M. A., Ismail, A., Rasool, M., et al. (2024). Nanotechnological innovations in agrochemicals: enhancing efficacy and environmental stewardship in pesticide and herbicide applications. Middle East Res. J. Agric. Food Sci. 4, 164–178. doi: 10.36348/merjafs.2024.v04i05.002
Upadhayay, V. K., Chitara, M. K., Mishra, D., Jha, M. N., Jaiswal, A., Kumari, G., et al. (2023). Synergistic impact of nanomaterials and plant probiotics in agriculture: a tale of two-way strategy for long-term sustainability. Front. Microbiol. 14:1133968. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133968,
Verma, N., Kaushal, P., and Sidhu, A. K. (2024). Harnessing biological synthesis: zinc oxide nanoparticles for plant biotic stress management. Front. Chem. 12:1432469. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1432469,
Wang, P., Calvo-Polanco, M., Reyt, G., Barberon, M., Champeyroux, C., Santoni, V., et al. (2019). Surveillance of cell wall diffusion barrier integrity modulates water and solute transport in plants. Sci. Rep. 9:4227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40588-5,
Wang, Q., Feng, X., Liu, Y., Li, W., Cui, W., Sun, Y., et al. (2023). Response of peanut plant and soil N-fixing bacterial communities to conventional and biodegradable microplastics. J. Hazard. Mater. 459:132142. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132142,
Wang, Z., Luo, W., Cheng, S., Zhang, H., Zong, J., and Zhang, Z. (2023). Ralstonia solanacearum - a soil borne hidden enemy of plants: research development in management strategies, their action mechanism and challenges. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1141902. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1141902,
Wang, L., Pan, T., Gao, X., An, J., Ning, C., Li, S., et al. (2022). Silica nanoparticles activate defense responses by reducing reactive oxygen species under Ralstonia solanacearum infection in tomato plants. NanoImpact 28:100418. doi: 10.1016/j.impact.2022.100418,
Wassie, K. B., and Yemata, G. (2025). Metal oxide nanoparticles as promising agents for triggering defense mechanisms in plants against bacterial diseases. Discov. Nano. 20:127. doi: 10.1186/s11671-025-04288-6,
Wei, Y., Chen, J., Dong, M., Yin, M., Shen, J., Gao, L., et al. (2025). Nano-enabled insecticides for efficient Pest management: definition, classification, synergistic mechanism, and safety assessment. Nanomaterials (Basel) 15. doi: 10.3390/nano15131050,
Wu, H., and Li, Z. (2022). Nano-enabled agriculture: how do nanoparticles cross barriers in plants? Plant Commun 3:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100346,
Wu, Z., Tang, Z., Yu, T., Zhang, J., Zheng, Y., Yang, J., et al. (2023). Nitrogen fertilization rates mediate rhizosphere soil carbon emissions of continuous peanut monoculture by altering cellulose-specific microbess. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1109860. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1109860
Xu, L., Zhu, Z., and Sun, D. W. (2021). Bioinspired Nanomodification strategies: moving from chemical-based Agrosystems to sustainable agriculture. ACS Nano 15, 12655–12686. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03948,
Xue, H., Lozano-Durán, R., and Macho, A. P. (2020). Insights into the root invasion by the plant pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum. Plants 9:516. doi: 10.3390/plants9040516,
Yadav, D., Das, S., Dhillayan, D., Yadav, S., and Bhukal, S. (2025). Environmentally benign nanotechnology: transforming elements into nano-agrochemicals for sustainable farming. Discov. Agric. 3:67. doi: 10.1007/s44279-025-00224-5
Yahiaoui, N., Chéron, J.-J., Ravelomanantsoa, S., Hamza, A. A., Petrousse, B., Jeetah, R., et al. (2017). Genetic diversity of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex in the Southwest Indian Ocean Islands. Front. Plant Sci. 8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02139,
Yang, Y., Chen, T., Dai, X., Yang, D., Wu, Y., Chen, H., et al. (2022). Comparative transcriptome analysis revealed molecular mechanisms of peanut leaves responding to Ralstonia solanacearum and its type III secretion system mutant. Front. Microbiol. 13:998817. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.998817,
Zaman, W., Ayaz, A., and Park, S. (2025). Nanomaterials in agriculture: a pathway to enhanced plant growth and abiotic stress resistance. Plants 14:716. doi: 10.3390/plants14050716,
Zhang, J., Klinkhamer, P. G. L., Vrieling, K., and Bezemer, T. M. (2022). Belowground responses of bacterial communities to foliar SA application over four plant generations. Plant Soil 470, 65–79. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-05158-7
Keywords: antimicrobial delivery systems, bacterial wilt, Peanut, NPs, Ralstonia solanacearum
Citation: Gelaye Y and Luo H (2026) Nanoparticle-delivered antimicrobials for targeted suppression of bacterial wilt in peanut. Front. Microbiol. 16:1740992. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1740992
Edited by:
Pramod Kumar Sahu, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (ICAR), IndiaReviewed by:
Katarzyna Otulak-Kozieł, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, PolandUtpal Dey, Central Agricultural University, India
Copyright © 2026 Gelaye and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Huaiyong Luo, aHVhaXlvbmdsdW9AY2Fhcy5jbg==