Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 08 January 2026

Sec. Microbiological Chemistry and Geomicrobiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1747422

This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobial Involvement in Biogeochemical Cycling and Contaminant Transformations at Land-Water Ecotones, volume IIView all 10 articles

Pyrite as a catalyst for the emergence of multiphase primitive cells

  • 1Center for Geomicrobiology and Biogeochemistry Research, State Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering and the Key Laboratory of Polymer Chemistry and Physics of the Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 3Frontiers Science Center for Deep-time Digital Earth, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China

Coacervate-based protocells are minimal systems that mimic certain properties of natural cells and are used to investigate the emergence of life from nonliving chemical systems. However, constructing protocells with hierarchical structures and life-like functions remains a challenge. In this work, we develop a novel coacervate-based protocell (droplet) composed of single-stranded oligonucleotides (ss-oligo), quaternized dextran (Q-dextran), and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB). In the presence of natural pyrite, the droplet encapsulates the pyrite, enhancing its peroxidase-like catalytic activity. This activity catalyzes oxidation of TMB to its oxidized form (TMBox), inducing a transition from single-phase to multiphase droplets. The resulting multiphase droplet consists of an internal TMBox/ss-oligo phase and a surrounding Q-dextran/ss-oligo phase, facilitating the sequestration and partitioning of ss-oligo into discrete regions. Notably, these droplets exhibit stability in their internal sub-compartments during fusion, showing their potential as dynamic and functional models in synthetic biology and biotechnology applications. Our study highlights that the catalytic activity of minerals may serve as a potential strategy for constructing hierarchically structured protocells that resemble the morphology and functions of living cells. This finding represents a significant step towards improving our mechanistic understanding of the transition from non-living matter to living systems under prebiotic conditions.

1 Introduction

Coacervate droplets, which are formed by liquid–liquid phase separation (Zheng et al., 2021) and share the same mechanism for the formation of membraneless organelles in biological systems (Brangwynne et al., 2015; Shin and Brangwynne, 2017), serve as an ideal platform for constructing artificial cells (Cook et al., 2023) and exploring the possible pathways of origins of life. Characterized by molecularly crowded and highly dynamic viscoelastic interiors (Alshareedah et al., 2024), coacervate droplets exhibit remarkable abilities especially to selectively concentrate bioactive molecules and to enhance enzyme reactivity (Abbas et al., 2021; Strulson et al., 2012). The features similar to those in living cells (Lin et al., 2023) have been achieved by varying the components, tuning the morphologies (Spoelstra et al., 2020), and placing the coacervate droplets under different conditions. For example, the droplets undergo dynamic fusion, fission, assembly, and dissolution in response to salt/proton concentration (Hong et al., 2022; Karoui et al., 2021), temperature (Hong et al., 2022), and physical stimuli such as light (Lafon and Martin, 2021; Agarwal et al., 2023), electric or magnetic stimuli (Capasso Palmiero et al., 2020; Jing et al., 2020).

Dynamic behavior is a fundamental feature of all living cells, which has been one of the aims when designing coacervates droplets as protocell models (Martin, 2019; Nair et al., 2023). Biochemical reactions including phosphorylation/dephosphorylation reactions (Aumiller and Keating, 2016), oxidation of glucose (Karoui et al., 2021), and polynucleotide synthesis (Deshpande et al., 2019) have been exploited to control the formation and dissolution of coacervate droplets in vitro. However, the protein-based enzymes governing these processes are believed to be absent on primitive Earth before the origin of life. It is proposed that the minerals possessed the enzyme-like activity (Huang et al., 2024) and served as the earliest catalysts (Aithal et al., 2023). Studies have shown that the activity of mineral nanoparticles can be enhanced when encapsulated by protocells (Koga et al., 2011; Smokers et al., 2024). However, the coacervate protocells whose dynamic behaviors are regulated by mineral-catalyzed chemical reactions are rarely studied.

Pyrite (FeS2) was formed on the Hadean Earth before the origin of life (Golden, 2019; Golden et al., 2019). It has been shown that pyrite is able to produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) under anoxic conditions (Gil-Lozano et al., 2017; Borda et al., 2001). In addition, pyrite can further decompose H2O2 to generate highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (·OH). The peroxidase-like (POD-like) catalytic activity (Cao et al., 2024; Meng et al., 2021) of pyrite may have contributed to oxidative processes on the early Earth. In this study, we incorporated pyrite particles in the coacervate droplet formed by single-stranded oligonucleotide (ss-oligo)/quaternized dextran (Q-dextran)/3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and investigated the catalytic properties of natural pyrite microparticles and its effect on the dynamic behavior of the droplets. We observed that the pyrite microparticles were effectively encapsulated by the coacervate droplets which enhanced the POD-like activity. As the TMB molecules were oxidized to TMBox by pyrite particles, the droplet underwent a transition from single-phase to multiphase, wherein the different proportions of TMBox, ss-oligo, and Q-dextran form membraneless sub-compartments. Significantly, these sub-compartments facilitate heterogeneous distribution and stability (the lower mobility) of DNA. Our findings elucidate the mutual interactions between coacervates and minerals, suggesting potential implications for the evolutionary processes of protocells on the early Earth.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

Two ss-oligos were purchased from Beijing Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd., including a 60-nt ss-oligo-L (TAATAGCTAATCATAGAATCTCTTTTAAATATAAAGTCATATCAAATTAAGAGAGAATTG) with and without FAM-labeling at the 5′ end, and a 21-nt ss-oligo (CTTACGCTGAGTACTTCGATT) with and without TAMRA-labeling at the 5′ end. The unlabeled ss-oligo samples were dissolved in deionized water to obtain a stock solution of 6 mg/mL, then mixed with 6.0 × 10−3 mg/mL Fam-labeled ss-oligo-L or TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo to track their distribution during coacervate droplet formation and separation. Q-dextran and TMB (≥99%) were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China) and dissolved in deionized water. Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 36.0%–38.0%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium acetate (NaOAc), acetic acid (AcOH), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), glycine, and sodium citrate (C6H5Na3O7) were all purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. All chemicals were used as received without further purification. Deionized water was used throughout the experiments.

2.2 Preparation of pyrite microparticles

Recent studies have demonstrated that FeS2 exhibits a peroxidase-like (POD-like) activity (Cao et al., 2024; Meng et al., 2021), prompting our investigation into how the POD-like activity of pyrite affects droplet dynamics. Bulk pyrite was obtained from Taobao, a popular e-commerce platform in China. Pyrite microparticles (about 13 μm) were obtained by grinding and passing through a 1,000-mesh sieve. Pyrite purity was checked using X-ray diffraction (XRD) performed on a Rigaku-D/MAX-PC 2500 instrument, equipped with Cu Kα radiation and a graphite monochromator, operating at 40 kV and 200 mA. Samples were scanned over a 2-theta range of 3–70 with a step size of 0.02 and a counting time of 0.12 s per step.

2.3 Optimizing conditions for the peroxidase-like activity of pyrite

The POD-like activity of pyrite was measured using substrate TMB in the presence of H2O2 under different reaction conditions. All experiments were performed at 23 °C. First, experiments were carried out in acetic acid–sodium acetate (AcOH–NaOAc) buffer (200 mM, pH 3.6), containing 1.0 mg/mL TMB, 0.10 mg/mL pyrite, and/or 0.50 mM H2O2. After the reaction had proceeded for 10 min, the absorbance of the colored oxidation products of TMB was monitored across 300–1,000 nm using a multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek Synergy™ H4, USA). Although TMBox exhibits stronger absorbance peaks at shorter wavelengths, the 652 nm peak was chosen for subsequent kinetic analyses because it provides the most stable and interference-free signal.

To evaluate the influence of different buffer compositions on pyrite activity, experiments were conducted in 160 mM/80 mM/40 mM AcOH–NaOAc, glycine–HCl, or citric acid–disodium hydrogen phosphate (CAPS) buffer at pH 3.6. After 10 min, the absorbance at 652 nm was measured, confirming the highest activity in 40 mM glycine–HCl. To determine the optimal reaction pH, the glycine–HCl buffer was adjusted using HCl/NaOH to pH 1.50, 2.33, 3.10, 3.60, 4.07, 4.70, 5.31, 6.31, 7.61, 8.53, and 10.1. The optimal pH for pyrite activity was found to be 4.07. Thus, all subsequent experiments were conducted under the conditions of 40 mM glycine–HCl at pH 4.07. To assess the effect of pyrite concentration, experiments were conducted using pyrite concentrations of 0.15 mg/mL, 0.10 mg/mL, 0.080 mg/mL, 0.040 mg/mL, and 0.020 mg/mL.

For kinetic parameter determination, all experiments were carried out in glycine–HCl buffer (40 mM, pH 4.07). The pyrite-only group contained 2.0 mg/mL TMB, 0.15 mg/mL pyrite and a concentration gradient of H2O2 from 0 to 5.0 mM (0, 0.078, 0.16, 0.31, 0.62, 1.2, 2.5, and 5.0 mM). The droplet-encapsulated pyrite group contained 3.0 mg/mL unlabeled ss-oligo (21-nt), 3.6 mg/mL Q-dextran, 0.15 mg/mL pyrite, and 2.0 mg/mL TMB. After incubating for 5.0 min, the same concentration gradient of H2O2 was added to initiate the reaction. The kinetic parameters were measured at 652 nm, 10 min after H2O2 addition. The Michaelis–Menten constants were obtained by fitting the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation using GraphPad Prism (10.1.1):

v = ( V max × [ S ] ) / ( K M + [ S ] )     (1)

where v is the initial reaction velocity, [S] is the substrate concentration, Vmax is the maximal reaction rate observed at the saturating substrate concentration, and KM is the substrate concentration at which the reaction rate is half of Vmax. v is calculated using the following Equation 2:

v = ΔA / ( Δt × ε × l )     (2)

where ΔA is the change of absorbance value, Δt is the reaction time interval for the change (s), ε is the molar absorption coefficient of the colorimetric substrate, which is typically 39,000 M−1 cm−1 at 652 nm for oxidized TMB, and l is the path length of light traveling in the cuvette (0.2 cm in our experiments). The kinetic constants KM and Vmax were calculated in GraphPad Prism 10.1.1 software through fitting the v versus [S] curve using the Michaelis–Menten equation (Equation 1).

The catalytic constant (kcat) is defined as the maximum number of substrate molecules converted to product per unit of time and is calculated by the following Equation 3:

K cat = V max / [ E ]     (3)

where [E] is the concentration of pyrite (M).

kcat/KM, which characterizes the catalytic ability of pyrite to the substrate (TMB), reflects the catalytic efficiency of pyrite.

2.4 Coacervate droplet preparation and phasing assays

Unlabeled ss-oligo (21-nt, 3.0 mg/mL), Q-dextran (3.6 mg/mL), pyrite (0.30 mg/mL), TMB (0.30 mg/mL), and 0.10 mM H2O2 were incubated in glycine–HCl buffer (40 mM, pH 4.07), in a total volume of 10 μL. In the fluorescence observation experiments, an additional 6.0 × 10−3 mg/mL of FAM-labeled ss-oligo-L or TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo was added to facilitate the observation of DNA distribution. After incubation for 5.0 min at 23 °C to allow for formation of condensates, samples were visualized by brightfield microscopy and fluorescent microscopy at 100× magnification using a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 Inverted Fluorescence Microscope (Germany).

Oxidized TMB exhibits absorbance across a broad wavelength range, which interferes with fluorescence imaging. Consequently, droplets with higher TMBox concentrations appeared darker under fluorescence microscope. To mitigate the color interference of TMBox on FAM-labeled ss-oligo-L/TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo, GSH (glutathione) was used to reduce TMBox to TMB. The final working concentrations of pyrite microparticle, TMB and H2O2 were 0.10 mg/mL, 0.10 mg/mL and 0.50 mM, respectively. GSH (0.40 mM) was added either at 0 or 6.0 min after the reaction had begun, and the change of peak intensity (652 nm) was monitored. The group without GSH was supplemented with deionized water.

2.5 Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assay

To investigate the mobility of DNA across and within droplets, FRAP experiments were conducted on both single-phase and multiphase droplets. The standard assay (10 μL) contained 3.0 mg/mL unlabeled ss-oligo, 6.0 × 10−3 mg/mL TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo, 3.6 mg/mL Q-dextran, 1.0 mM H2O2 in glycine–HCl buffer (40 mM, pH 4.07). After incubation for 5.0 min at 23 °C to allow condensate formation, samples were imaged under the Super Resolution Microscope N-SIM S (Nikon A1 N-SIM S, Japan) using a 100 × oil-immersion objective. Condensates with a clear red fluorescent signal were selected for photobleaching (“automatic focus” was activated, “pixel binning” was set at 2 × 2, and “exposure time” was set at 300 ms). The partial region was photobleached at 561 nm (Laser Power: 17.6), followed by a fluorescence recovery period of 50.4 s. The fluorescence intensity of the photobleached area was normalized relative to that of the unbleached area.

3 Results

3.1 Characterization of pyrite POD-like activity

XRD patterns of pyrite matched the standard pyrite pattern [FeS2 (PDF 42-1340)], confirming its crystalline structure (Figure 1A). The POD-like catalytic activity was then investigated using TMB oxidation. In the sample containing pyrite, TMB and H2O2, a full scan absorption spectrum of TMBox displayed peaks at 380 nm, 450 nm, and 652 nm. No significant absorbance was detected when TMB was mixed with H2O2 without pyrite (Figure 1B). However, when pyrite was mixed with TMB without H2O2, a weak absorbance peak corresponding to TMBox was observed (Figure 1B). This is consistent with previous reports (Cohn et al., 2006; Gil-Lozano et al., 2017; He et al., 2023), indicating that when pyrite is exposed to water, a small amount of H2O2 is spontaneously generated. The resulting hydroxyl radicals subsequently react with TMB, forming trace amount of TMBox. Although the absorption peak at 652 nm is not the highest in intensity, it provides the most stable and interference-free signal for kinetic quantification. Therefore, 652 nm was selected as the detection wavelength.

Figure 1
Panel A shows an X-ray diffraction pattern for FeS2 with intensity peaks at various angles. Panel B displays absorbance spectra of TMB with H2O2 and pyrite under different conditions, with wavelength on the x-axis. Panel C presents bar graphs showing absorbance at 652 nm for different buffer concentrations, with AcOH-NaOAc, Glycine-HCl, and CAPS buffers. Panel D shows a bar graph of absorbance at 652 nm over a pH range from 1.5 to 10.07, plus water.

Figure 1. Characterization of pyrite. (A) XRD pattern of natural pyrite. (B) (Top) Reaction scheme of TMB oxidation catalyzed by pyrite. (Bottom) Formation of TMBox in the presence of pyrite (0.10 mg/mL) and/or H2O2 (0.50 mM). (C) Influence of buffer composition on the catalytic activity of pyrite (0.10 mg/mL). (D) Effect of pH on the catalytic activity of pyrite (0.10 mg/mL).

To evaluate the POD-like activity of pyrite microparticles, we first determined the optimal buffer system for the reaction. Pyrite exhibited POD-like activity in both acetic acid–sodium acetate (AcOH–NaOAc) and glycine–HCl buffer systems, while no activity was detected in citric acid-disodium hydrogen phosphate (CAPS) buffer (Figure 1C), possibly due to adsorption of citric acid onto pyrite surface (Zhang et al., 2017). Furthermore, the catalytic activity was influenced by buffer concentration, with a relatively high activity around 40 mM. Considering that different buffer components may introduce additional effects, the catalytic activity of pyrite was subsequently evaluated in 40 mM glycine buffer, with the pH adjusted between 1.50 and 10.07 using HCl or NaOH, revealing the highest activity at pH 4.07 (Figure 1D).

3.2 The kinetics of pyrite-catalyzed oxidation: encapsulated and non-encapsulated states

According to a previous study (Song et al., 2020), the catalytic process of pyrite microparticles can be described in two steps. First, hydroxyl radicals (·OH) are produced from the interaction of pyrite microparticles with H2O2. Subsequently, these radicals oxidize TMB, resulting in the formation of oxidized TMB (TMBox). It is anticipated that a higher dosage of pyrite microparticles would generate more ·OH, thereby enhancing its catalytic efficiency. This hypothesis is supported by our data (Figure 2A), where the activity is proportional to pyrite concentration. The steady-state kinetic properties were examined by varying the concentration of H2O2 in a constant concentration of 0.15 mg/mL pyrite-based catalytic system. The oxidation reaction catalyzed by pyrite exhibited a typical Michaelis–Menten curve (Figure 2B). Based on the fitting, the KM value for the reaction is 1.73 × 10−4 M, and the Vmax is 5.15 ± 0.50 μM/s (Table 1).

Figure 2
A set of scientific images includes: A) a line graph showing absorbance over time for different concentrations (0.15 mg/ml to 0.02 mg/ml), B) a scatter plot with a curve fit showing reaction rate versus hydrogen peroxide concentration, R² = 0.90, C) a microscopic image of droplets with a magnified inset, and D) another scatter plot with a curve fit of reaction rate versus hydrogen peroxide concentration, R² = 0.95.

Figure 2. Influence of coacervate droplets on pyrite activity. (A) Catalytic activity of pyrite at a concentration range of 0.02–0.15 mg/mL in the presence of 1.0 mg/mL TMB and 0.50 mM H2O2. (B) Catalytic kinetics of 0.15 mg/mL pyrite as a function of H2O2 concentration. (C) Encapsulation of pyrite within droplets. (D) Catalytic kinetics of 0.15 mg/mL pyrite after droplets encapsulation.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Kinetic parameters for the POD-like activity of pyrite with H2O2 as substrate.a

The POD-like activity of pyrite highlights its potential as an early catalyst in the origin of life. In prebiotic chemistry studies, this concept is important because the interaction of pyrite with early Earth environments might have played a role in facilitating primitive metabolic reactions. To explore whether mineral catalytic activity could occur within primitive cells, we investigated the interactions between pyrite and protocells. As expected, after mixing pyrite, ss-oligo and Q-dextran coacervate droplets with TMB (as chromogenic agent) for 5 min, the pyrite microparticles became efficiently encapsulated within the droplets (Figure 2C). However, because the number of droplets exceeded the number of pyrite microparticles, many droplets remained without pyrite.

To evaluate the catalytic activity of encapsulated pyrite, varying concentrations of H2O2 were added to the samples, and the formation of TMBox was monitored through colorimetric detection. Indeed, the oxidation reaction catalyzed by droplet-encapsulated pyrite also exhibited a typical Michaelis–Menten curve and can be fitted to the Michaelis–Menten equation (Figure 2D). The KM value of pyrite microparticles inside droplets is much higher than that of un-encapsulated pyrite (KM: 3.75 × 10−4 M vs. 1.73 × 10−4 M, Table 1), indicating a weakened affinity for H2O2. However, the Vmax of droplet-encapsulated pyrite was approximately 3-fold higher than that of pyrite alone (Vmax: 15.5 ± 1.4 μM/s vs. 5.15 ± 0.50 μM/s), resulting in a higher catalytic efficiency (Kcat/KM: 33.1 ± 3.0 vs. 23.8 ± 2.3).

These results suggest that, although encapsulation within coacervate droplets introduces physical barriers that may reduce the accessibility of H2O2 to the pyrite surface and restrain the diffusion of ·OH, the local enrichment of TMB within the droplets compensates for these effects and ultimately enhances the overall catalytic efficiency.

3.3 The emergence of multiphase droplets catalyzed by pyrite

To investigate the impact of mineral catalytic activity on droplets, we observed the color changes and dynamic behavior of droplets under a microscope. Our observations confirmed that, consistent with the catalytic activity assays, the blue TMBox was not observed in the presence of either pyrite or H2O2 alone (Figure 3A; Supplementary Figure S1), suggesting that the low amount of TMBox formed in these samples (Figure 1B) was insufficient to produce a visible color change. In contrast, in the presence of both pyrite and H2O2, the droplets turned blue, indicating the formation of TMBox. Notably, the smaller droplets exhibited a darker blue color, suggesting that the reaction proceeded more rapidly in these droplets. Under all experimental conditions, droplet fusions were observed. Interestingly, in the absence of H2O2, two droplets fused to form a homogeneous droplet (Figure 3B; Supplementary Video S1). However, in the presence of both pyrite and H2O2, fusion resulted in multiphase droplets, with smaller droplets remaining stably within the larger ones (Figures 3AC; Supplementary Video S2).

Figure 3
Set of microscopic images showing droplets under different conditions. Panel A: Droplets containing 0.15 mg/mL and 0.45 mg/mL TMB with pyrite, before and after hydrogen peroxide is added, showing a color change to blue. Panel B: Single-phase droplets at time intervals 0.00s, 0.15s, and 0.25s. Panel C: Multiphase droplets at time intervals 0.00s, 0.25s, and 2.00s, highlighting structural changes. Each droplet is marked with a scale bar indicating size.

Figure 3. Formation of multiphase droplets. (A) Pyrite induces the formation of multiphase droplets in the presence of H2O2. (B) Droplet fusion results in isotropic single-phase droplets in the absence of H2O2. (C) Droplet fusion results in multiphase droplets in the presence of both pyrite and H2O2. The start time of fusion is recorded as 0 s.

3.4 Heterogeneous distribution and mobility of DNA in multiphase droplets

To further reveal the formation mechanism of the multiphase droplets, as well as the distribution of components within the droplets, we initially introduced 6.0 × 10−3 mg/mL of FAM-labeled ss-oligo-L (which is excited at 492 nm and emits light at 517 nm) into the droplet system. Ss-oligo-L is about three times longer than that of the ss-oligo used in the droplet system, allowing us to explore how the multiphase structure affects the distribution of exogenous nucleotides. Since TMBox (oxidized TMB) exhibits absorbance across full wavelengths, smaller droplets with higher concentrations of TMBox appeared black under fluorescence microscopy (Figure 4A). To mitigate the color interference of TMBox on FAM-labeled ss-oligo-L, GSH (glutathione) was used to reduce TMBox to TMB (Figure 4B). In the pyrite-H2O2 system, an increase in absorbance from TMBox production was observed. Introducing GSH at the beginning of the reaction prevented any color development, indicating that GSH inhibited the oxidation of TMB. Also, addition of GSH after 6.0 min of the reaction resulted in a rapid decrease in absorbance, confirming that TMBox was reduced to TMB. Following the reduction of TMBox to TMB by GSH, the multiphase system maintained its stability, and as anticipated, the fluorescence of FAM-labeled ss-oligo-L was clearly observable and was predominantly enriched in the smaller droplets (Figure 4C). The multiphase droplets, as visualized by FAM-labeled ss-oilgo-L, are similar to those by TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo (Figure 3A), indicating that the multiple phase formation is driven by ss-oligo and independent of ss-oligo length.

Figure 4
Scientific visualizations illustrating chemical reactions and fluorescence investigation. Panel A shows microscopic images of TMB oxidation in droplet form with fluorescence. Panel B presents a graph plotting absorbance at five hundred twenty-two nanometers over time, depicting the interaction between TMB, hydrogen peroxide, and pyrite, with and without glutathione. Panel C shows the FAM-labeled ss-oligo-L distribution in multiphase droplets after GSH reduction. Panel D and E include fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments for single-phase and multi-phase systems respectively, with fluorescence images and intensity versus time graphs. Each panel features specific scales for measurement.

Figure 4. Distribution and mobility of DNA in droplets. (A) FAM-ss-oligo-L distribution in single-phase and multiphase droplets. (B) Reduction of TMBox by GSH at different times. (C) FAM-ss-oligo-L distribution in multiphase droplets after GSH reduction. (D,E) (Top) Fluorescence recovery in single-phase and multiphase droplets upon photobleaching. The images show fluorescence intensity before photobleaching (before), immediately after photobleaching (0 s), and after recovery for 50.4 s (50.4 s). (Bottom) Fluorescence recovery of TAMRA-ss-oligo in single-phase and multiphase droplets after photobleaching.

To investigate the mobility of DNA in single-phase and multiphase droplets, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments were conducted using TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo, which is identical to the ss-oligo used in the droplet system, eliminating any potential differences in mobility due to variation of sequence length. Before photobleaching, an image was captured as a reference for fluorescence intensity, and 0 s was marked after photobleaching (Figures 4D,E). The results showed that after photobleaching, the fluorescence intensity of TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo decreased to 60%–70% of its original value. In single-phase droplets, because of high DNA mobility, TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo quickly recovered fluorescence to >96% after 50.4 s. In contrast, the mobility of TAMRA-labeled ss-oligo in the multiphase droplets was significantly reduced, with fluorescence recovery reaching only 71% after the same amount of time. This suggests that DNA mobility decreases after the formation of the multiphase system, implying that mineral catalysis may promote DNA accumulation and preservation within protocells.

4 Discussion

Droplets composed of ss-oligo and Q-dextran formed by liquid-liquid phase separation have been considered a potential protocell model for early life. These coacervate droplets can encapsulate various biomolecules and may have played a role in offering a compartmentalized space for biochemical reactions. Our study demonstrated that these droplets can encapsulate natural pyrite microparticles and increase the catalytic activity of pyrite. Correspondingly, the catalytic activity of pyrite induces a more complex structure in protocells, leading to heterogeneous distribution and mobility of DNA. This may also shed light on the potential mechanisms of storage and stabilization of genetic materials in primary cells.

Although the early Earth was predominantly a reducing environment, mechanical forces on mineral surfaces could have generated reactive oxygen species (ROS), potentially providing the source of H2O2 (He et al., 2023; Xian et al., 2019). Therefore, we proposed a model for the emergence of these complex protocells (Figure 5). Initially, TMB, ss-oligo, and Q-dextran form a coacervate droplet where the charges are balanced (Figures 5A,B). The peroxidase-like activity of pyrite catalyzes H2O2 to produce hydroxyl radicals (·OH) (Figure 5C), which then oxidize TMB to its oxidized form, TMBox (Figure 5D). The oxidized TMB gains more positive charges, which generates two major effects: (1) the protocell becomes positively charged (Figure 5E), which is prone to capture more negatively-charged ss-oligo and release more positively charged Q-dextran to maintain a charge balance; (2) the TMBox inside the droplets interact with ss-oligo to form more condensed phase.

Figure 5
Diagram showing the formation and behavior of droplets through various stages. In A, TMB, ss-oligo, and Q-Dextran are combined. B illustrates single-phase droplets. C and D show pyrite reacting with hydrogen peroxide to form hydroxyl radicals, oxidizing TMB to TMBox. E indicates TMB oxidizing faster in smaller droplets. F depicts the merging of droplets, leading to G, which displays multiphase droplets containing ss-oligo.

Figure 5. Schematic of pyrite-induced multiphase droplet formation. (A,B) TMB, ss-oligo, and Q-dextran assemble to form coacervate droplets with balanced charges. (C) Pyrite exhibits peroxidase-like activity, catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 to produce hydroxyl radicals (·OH). (D) The hydroxyl radicals (·OH) oxidize TMB to its oxidized form, TMBox. (E) As TMB becomes oxidized and gains positive charges, the protocells exhibit an overall positive charge. This promotes the capture of negatively charged ss-oligo and the release of positively charged Q-dextran. (F,G) Due to varying reaction rates, droplets of different sizes exhibit different densities of TMBox and ss-oligo. The smaller droplets, with higher positive charge, accumulate more viscous TMBox/ss-oligo, maintaining stability after merging and absorbing DNA from larger droplets.

These effects result in redistribution of the components inside the droplets as well as the differentiation of the droplets. Due to varying reaction rates, droplets of different sizes form, containing different densities of TMBox and ss-oligo. Smaller droplets, with their higher reaction rates, accumulate more condensed TMBox/ss-oligo phases, which may result in higher viscosity and stability after merging and absorbing DNA from larger droplets (Figures 5F,G). This behavior gives rise to multiphase protocells, and the DNA-enriched subcompartment resembles key features of modern subcellular structures, such as the nucleoid in prokaryotes (Thanbichler et al., 2005). Such compartmentalization may represent a plausible prebiotic mechanism for molecular sorting, stabilization, and selective compartmentalization.

5 Conclusion

This study demonstrates a dual impact of interaction between protocells and pyrite: protocells enhance the catalytic efficiency of pyrite, while pyrite catalysis promotes the emergence of life-like structural features in the protocells. These findings suggest a synergistic relationship between primitive cellular systems and mineral catalysts, offering insights into the evolution of early life.

The enzyme-like catalytic activities of minerals have been increasingly reported, suggesting their potential roles as fundamental catalysts in early primitive biochemical processes. It is estimated that approximately 420 different types of minerals existed on prebiotic Earth (Hazen, 2013). The surfaces of these minerals played crucial roles in protecting, selecting, concentrating, templating, and catalyzing pre-life organic molecules (Dong et al., 2022; Hazen et al., 2008), facilitating the chemical reactions necessary for the emergence of life. Future studies should explore the interactions between protocells and other minerals present on prebiotic Earth to better understand their contributions to the origin and evolution of early life.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

ND: Visualization, Investigation, Conceptualization, Software, Data curation, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Methodology. TR: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. DL: Visualization, Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Methodology. HD: Visualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42192500 and 42192503), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2025YFF0811803), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2652023001).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Drs. Li Huang, Lei Su, Haiyun Wang, Zhimeng Li at the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Science, for technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1747422/full#supplementary-material

References

Abbas, M., Lipiński, W. P., Wang, J., and Spruijt, E. (2021). Peptide-based coacervates as biomimetic protocells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 3690–3705. doi: 10.1039/D0CS00307G,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Agarwal, S., Dizani, M., Osmanovic, D., and Franco, E. (2023). Light-controlled growth of DNA organelles in synthetic cells. Interface Focus 13:20230017. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2023.0017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aithal, A., Dagar, S., and Rajamani, S. (2023). Metals in prebiotic catalysis: a possible evolutionary pathway for the emergence of Metalloproteins. ACS Omega 8, 5197–5208. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07635,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Alshareedah, I., Singh, A., Yang, S., Ramachandran, V., Quinn, A., Potoyan, D. A., et al. (2024). Determinants of viscoelasticity and flow activation energy in biomolecular condensates. Sci. Adv. 10:eadi6539. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi6539

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aumiller, W. M. Jr., and Keating, C. D. (2016). Phosphorylation-mediated RNA/peptide complex coacervation as a model for intracellular liquid organelles. Nat. Chem. 8, 129–137. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2414,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Borda, M. J., Elsetinow, A. R., Schoonen, M. A., and Strongin, D. R. (2001). Pyrite-induced hydrogen peroxide formation as a driving force in the evolution of photosynthetic organisms on an early earth. Astrobiology 1, 283–288. doi: 10.1089/15311070152757474,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brangwynne, C. P., Tompa, P., and Pappu, R. V. (2015). Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions. Nat. Phys. 11, 899–904. doi: 10.1038/nphys3532

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, H., Yuan, Y., Zhao, R., Shi, W., Jiang, J., Gao, Y., et al. (2024). Deciphering the catalytic mechanism of peroxidase-like activity of iron sulfide nanozymes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 30958–30966. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c06024,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Capasso Palmiero, U., Küffner, A. M., Krumeich, F., Faltova, L., and Arosio, P. (2020). Adaptive chemoenzymatic microreactors composed of inorganic nanoparticles and bioinspired intrinsically disordered proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 8138–8142. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000835,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cohn, C. A., Mueller, S., Wimmer, E., Leifer, N., Greenbaum, S., Strongin, D. R., et al. (2006). Pyrite-induced hydroxyl radical formation and its effect on nucleic acids. Geochem. Trans. 7:3. doi: 10.1186/1467-4866-7-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cook, A. B., Novosedlik, S., and Van Hest, J. C. M. (2023). Complex coacervate materials as artificial cells. Acc. Mater. Res. 4, 287–298. doi: 10.1021/accountsmr.2c00239,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deshpande, S., Brandenburg, F., Lau, A., Last, M. G. F., Spoelstra, W. K., Reese, L., et al. (2019). Spatiotemporal control of coacervate formation within liposomes. Nat. Commun. 10:1800. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09855-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, H., Huang, L., Zhao, L., Zeng, Q., Liu, X., Sheng, Y., et al. (2022). A critical review of mineral-microbe interaction and co-evolution: mechanisms and applications. Natl. Sci. Rev. 9:nwac128. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac128

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gil-Lozano, C., Davila, A. F., Losa-Adams, E., Fairén, A. G., and Gago-Duport, L. (2017). Quantifying Fenton reaction pathways driven by self-generated H2O2 on pyrite surfaces. Sci. Rep. 7:43703. doi: 10.1038/srep43703

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Golden, J. (2019). Mineral evolution database: data model for mineral age associations. Master’s thesis,. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.

Google Scholar

Golden, J. J., Downs, R. T., Hazen, R. M., Pires, A. J., and Ralph, J. (2019). Mineral evolution database: data-driven age assignment, how does a mineral get an age? Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs 51:334056. doi: 10.1130/abs/2019AM-334056

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hazen, R. M. (2013). Paleomineralogy of the hadean eon: a preliminary species list. Am. J. Sci. 313, 807–843. doi: 10.2475/09.2013.01

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hazen, R. M., Papineau, D., Bleeker, W., Downs, R. T., and Yang, H. (2008). Mineral evolution. Am. Mineral. 93, 1693–1720. doi: 10.2138/am.2008.2955

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

He, H., Wu, X., Zhu, J., Lin, M., Lv, Y., Xian, H., et al. (2023). A mineral-based origin of earth’s initial hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120:e2221984120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221984120,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, Y., Najafi, S., Casey, T., Shea, J. E., Han, S. I., and Hwang, D. S. (2022). Hydrophobicity of arginine leads to reentrant liquid-liquid phase separation behaviors of arginine-rich proteins. Nat. Commun. 13:7326. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35001-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, X. L., Harmer, J. R., Schenk, G., and Southam, G. (2024). Inorganic Fe–O and Fe–S oxidoreductases: paradigms for prebiotic chemistry and the evolution of enzymatic activity in biology. Front. Chem. 12:1349020. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1349020

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jing, H., Bai, Q., Lin, Y. N., Chang, H., Yin, D., and Liang, D. (2020). Fission and internal fusion of protocell with membraneless “organelles” formed by liquid–liquid phase separation. Langmuir 36, 8017–8026. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01864,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Karoui, H., Seck, M. J., and Martin, N. (2021). Self-programmed enzyme phase separation and multiphase coacervate droplet organization. Chem. Sci. 12, 2794–2802. doi: 10.1039/D0SC06418A,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Koga, S., Williams, D. S., Perriman, A. W., and Mann, S. (2011). Peptide-nucleotide microdroplets as a step towards a membrane-free protocell model. Nat. Chem. 3, 720–724. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1110,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lafon, S., and Martin, N. (2021). Reversible photocontrol of DNA coacervation. Methods Enzymol. 646, 329–351. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2020.06.013,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, Z., Beneyton, T., Baret, J. C., and Martin, N. (2023). Coacervate droplets for synthetic cells. Small Methods 7:e2300496. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202300496,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, N. (2019). Dynamic synthetic cells based on liquid–liquid phase separation. Chembiochem 20, 2553–2568. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900183,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, X., Li, D., Chen, L., He, H., Wang, Q., Hong, C., et al. (2021). High-performance self-cascade pyrite nanozymes for apoptosis-ferroptosis synergistic tumor therapy. ACS Nano 15, 5735–5751. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c01248,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nair, K. S., Radhakrishnan, S., and Bajaj, H. (2023). Dynamic control of functional coacervates in synthetic cells. ACS Synth. Biol. 12, 2168–2177. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00249,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, Y., and Brangwynne, C. P. (2017). Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357:eaaf4382. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4382,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Smokers, I. B. A., Visser, B. S., Slootbeek, A. D., Huck, W. T. S., and Spruijt, E. (2024). How droplets can accelerate reactions─coacervate protocells as catalytic microcompartments. Acc. Chem. Res. 57, 1885–1895. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00114,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, C., Ding, W., Zhao, W., Liu, H., Wang, J., Yao, Y., et al. (2020). High peroxidase-like activity realized by facile synthesis of FeS2 nanoparticles for sensitive colorimetric detection of H2O2 and glutathione. Biosens. Bioelectron. 151:111983. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111983,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Spoelstra, W. K., Van Der Sluis, E. O., Dogterom, M., and Reese, L. (2020). Nonspherical coacervate shapes in an enzyme-driven active system. Langmuir 36, 1956–1964. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02719,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Strulson, C. A., Molden, R. C., Keating, C. D., and Bevilacqua, P. C. (2012). RNA catalysis through compartmentalization. Nat. Chem. 4, 941–946. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1466,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Thanbichler, M., Wang, S. C., and Shapiro, L. (2005). The bacterial nucleoid: a highly organized and dynamic structure. J. Cell. Biochem. 96, 506–521. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20519,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xian, H., Zhu, J., Tan, W., Tang, H., Liu, P., Zhu, R., et al. (2019). The mechanism of defect induced hydroxylation on pyrite surfaces and implications for hydroxyl radical generation in prebiotic chemistry. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 244, 163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.10.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., Yao, W., and Yuan, S. (2017). Citrate-enhanced release of arsenic during pyrite oxidation at circumneutral conditions. Water Res. 109, 245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.058,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, B., Avni, Y., Andelman, D., and Podgornik, R. (2021). Phase separation of polyelectrolytes: the effect of charge regulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 125, 7863–7870. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c01986,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mineral catalysis, mineral-protocell interactions, multiphase coacervates, primitive cells, pyrite

Citation: Ding N, Ren T, Liang D and Dong H (2026) Pyrite as a catalyst for the emergence of multiphase primitive cells. Front. Microbiol. 16:1747422. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1747422

Received: 16 November 2025; Revised: 11 December 2025; Accepted: 12 December 2025;
Published: 08 January 2026.

Edited by:

Xiangfeng Zeng, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Reviewed by:

Jianxi Ying, Ningbo University, China
Ruiqin Yi, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Copyright © 2026 Ding, Ren, Liang and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hailiang Dong, ZG9uZ2hAY3VnYi5lZHUuY24=; Dehai Liang, ZGxpYW5nQHBrdS5lZHUuY24=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.