Emily E. Pfeufer
Glen Groben
Lindsay Harrison1
Alina S. Puig- 1United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Foreign Disease Weed Science Research Unit, Frederick, MD, United States
- 2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Agricultural Research Service Research Participation Program, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
- 3Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam
To determine the diversity of oomycetes in Vietnam, particularly in the presumed center of origin of most Phytophthora taxa, isolates were collected from rivers, agricultural soils, and forested areas. Species identification was performed using sequences from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and cytochrome 2 oxidase (cox2) regions of the genome. Of the 245 isolates included in this study, the majority (66.5%) were identified as Phytopythium spp., followed by Phytophthora spp. (31%) and Pythium spp. (2.4%). The most prevalent species were Phytopythium vexans and Phytophthora cinnamomi, accounting for 51.8 and 24.5%, respectively, of all isolates obtained. A total of 17 isolates were identified as belonging to multiple undescribed species. From agricultural soils, only one isolate each of Phytophthora and Pythium was obtained, with the remaining 93% belonging to the genus Phytopythium. This study shows that natural and agricultural areas in Vietnam harbor a wide diversity of oomycetes, including several undescribed species. The identification of oomycete species in a center of origin will help identify potential emerging pathogens that can become a threat to U.S. agriculture.
1 Introduction
The oomycete group includes over 1,500 species, encompassing organisms that infect aquatic lifeforms, such as Saprolegnia, as well as pathogens of forest and food crops (Judelson and Ah-Fong, 2019; Thines, 2018; Kamoun et al., 2015). Oomycetes that affect plants include the genera Phytophthora, Phytopythium, and Pythium, as well as numerous unculturable genera that cause downy mildew disease. The number of recognized oomycete species has dramatically increased in recent years. Approximately 75% of Phytophthora species have been formally described since 2004, and the number of Phytopythium species has doubled since the genus was established in 2010 (Jung et al., 2024; Bala et al., 2010).
Phytophthora, Phytopythium, and Pythium are morphologically similar, possessing hyaline, coenocytic mycelia (Ho, 2018; Ghimire and Baysal-Gurel, 2023). Phytopythium species were classified within Pythium clade K until 2010, when they were reassigned to an independent genus (Bala et al., 2010). Phytopythium and Pythium produce zoospores in a similar manner, with undifferentiated protoplasm released from the sporangia through a tube into a vesicle, followed by differentiation into zoospores (Marano et al., 2014; Ho, 2018; Nam and Choi, 2019). In Phytophthora, the differentiation into zoospores occurs entirely within the sporangium (Ho, 2018).
Multiple surveys of oomycetes have been conducted in Southeast Asia, as evidence suggests that it is the center of origin for Phytophthora clades 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (Dang et al., 2021; Jung et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2020; Zentmeyer, 1988). Large-scale collection efforts have also been undertaken on additional continents to improve the understanding of diversity and evolution within the genus (Jung et al., 2024). Despite rapid taxonomic advancements, our understanding of Phytophthora may only encompass 55% of the total species (Scott et al., 2019).
Numerous surveys have been conducted in natural areas of Southeast Asia; however, none have included agricultural areas. In Vietnam, Phytophthora species have not been found causing disease in forest environments (Jung et al., 2017), but several species are known to cause fruit rot and gummosis in citrus plants, as well as root rot in black pepper within the country (Van Tran et al., 2023; Puglisi et al., 2017; Thao et al., 2024). The objective of this study was to determine the oomycetes present in natural and agricultural areas of Vietnam by sampling river water and soil from both forests and agricultural regions (Table 1). The knowledge gained from this research opens avenues for a more comprehensive understanding of undescribed oomycetes and potential connections between uncultivated and cultivated areas.
Table 1. Summary of sites in Vietnam sampled for oomycetes in 2018.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Sampling and isolation
Isolates used in this study were collected from multiple locations across Vietnam in 2018, as summarized in Table 1 and displayed geographically in Supplementary Figure 1. Elevation, substrate, prevalent plants, province, and geographic coordinates were recorded and maintained as part of the dataset.
Two methods were used to isolate oomycetes based on the type of the sample taken. Soil samples (10 cc) were collected in disposable cups and brought to the laboratory, where they were flooded with sterile water and kept at 18–20 °C under natural light. Pieces of leaflets aged 3–10 days from Lithocarpus bacgiangensis, Quercus glauca, Q. gilva, Castanopsis indica, Chamaecyparis hodginsii, or Acacia mangium were placed on the flooded soil, where they served as baits for newly emerging zoospores. After 2–3 days, a subset of the leaflets developed necrotic lesions characteristic of Phytophthora infection. Lesion margins were surface-disinfected, air-dried, and plated onto PARPNH agar, as described by Erwin and Ribeiro (1996). PARPNH consists of 20% V8 agar containing 10 mg pimaricin, 200 mg ampicillin, 10 mg rifampicin, 200 mg pentachloronitrobenzene, 50 mg nystatin, and 50 mg hymexazol per liter (Jung et al., 2000). PARPNH is semi-selective for oomycetes. For river samples, water was collected, and leaves of Castanopsis sp. or Quercus sp. were placed on the surface of the water to serve as baits. Following the development of necrotic lesions, the organisms were isolated and processed as described above.
Resulting colonies were subcultured by transferring small fragments of mycelia to obtain organisms in pure culture. Isolates were stored at 4 °C on the colonized plates of PARPNH agar and annually subcultured to maintain viability.
2.2 DNA extraction and PCR
To extract genomic DNA, isolates were grown in pure culture on clarified 20% V8 juice agar for 1 week. Aerial mycelium and the upper layer of the media plate were gently scraped with a sterile scalpel, and genomic DNA was extracted using the FastDNA soil extraction kit (FastDNA, MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH). The genomic DNA was used as a template in standard PCR reactions using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 6/4 (White et al., 1990; Cooke et al., 2000) and cox2 primers (Hudspeth et al., 2000). PCR products were visualized by gel electrophoresis to confirm amplification based on the presence of 1 kb and 640 bp bands for ITS and cox2, respectively.
2.3 Isolate identification
PCR amplicons were purified using ExoSap-IT (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and submitted for Sanger sequencing (Eurofins Inc., Louisville, KY, USA). Initial reactions were sequenced with the ITS6 primer, but the samples that yielded low-quality sequences were additionally sequenced in the reverse direction using the ITS4 primer. In these cases, forward and reverse sequences were aligned, edited, and analyzed using BLASTn. To confirm or clarify identification, amplified fragments of the cox2 region were bidirectionally sequenced, aligned, edited, and analyzed with BLASTn.
2.4 Phylogenetic analyses
To determine the diversity of oomycetes detected in this study, phylogenetic analyses were conducted using sequences of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the cytochrome c oxidase 2 subunit (cox2). The ends of each sanger sequence were trimmed using the Trim End function in Geneious Prime (2023.0.1; Biomatters Inc., Boston, MA, USA) with the corresponding primer pair. When available, a consensus sequence was generated from each bidirectional sequence for both ITS and cox2 using the De Novo Assemble function in Geneious Prime. Representative sequences of known species were retrieved from GenBank for Phytopythium, Phytophthora, Pythium, and the outgroup Globisporangium paroecandrum (Supplementary Table 1). The representative sequences were aligned with the Vietnam isolate sequences using MAFFT (v7.490) (Katoh and Standley, 2013), and terminal regions, including primer regions, were trimmed using Geneious Prime. Sequences with missing ends were replaced with “?” to denote missing data. The resulting alignment was analyzed with IQ-TREE (v2.2.3) (Nguyen et al., 2015) to generate maximum likelihood trees with automatic model selection (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017). The resulting Newick tree files were visualized using FigTree v1.4.4.1 The tree was rooted using the consensus sequence of Globisporangium paroecandrum CBS 157.64 (Figure 1). This process was done to generate separate ITS and cox2 gene trees. A concatenated tree was not generated because most reference Phytophthora and Pythium sequences do not have cox2 sequences.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees of the ITS (A) and cox2 (B) sequences of the Phytopythium, Phytophthora, and Pythium isolates obtained in this study. Isolates with labels ending in a 1- to 3-digit number are from the current study, while other isolates used in the comparison in the phylogenetic tree are publicly available sequences of reference strains.
Sequences were deposited in NCBI GenBank: ITS accessions OR531129–OR531278 and cox2 accessions OR704574–OR704733. Isolates showing >99% sequence identity to a deposited reference sequence were classified as that species, provided that these groups were supported by phylogenetic analysis.
3 Results
3.1 Oomycetes found in agricultural and forest areas of Vietnam
Over 700 isolates were obtained from the 93 sites sampled in 2018; however, less than half were revived following long-term storage. Sequences were generated from 245 isolates, corresponding to 21 unique oomycete species. The majority of isolates (66.5%) were identified as Phytopythium spp., followed by Phytophthora spp. (31%) (Table 2) and Pythium spp. (2.4%). Phytopythium spp. accounted for 93.3% (28 of 30) of isolates obtained from agricultural soils, 65.6% (118 of 180) from forest soils, and 48.6% (17 of 35) from river samples. Oomycete taxa obtained from the different types of sites (agricultural soil, forest soil, and water) are summarized in a heatmap (Figure 2).
Table 2. Subgeneric taxonomic identifications of oomycete isolates from Vietnam, based on >99% ITS DNA sequence homology and phylogenetic grouping.
Figure 2. Heatmap summarizing oomycete taxa obtained from the different types of sites (agricultural soil, forest soil, and water).
Phytopythium vexans and Phytophthora cinnamomi were the most frequently isolated species, accounting for 77.9 and 78.9% of isolates within their respective genera (Figure 2). Just over 6.9% (17 out of 245) of sequenced isolates could not be assigned to a species due to either having high (>98%) nucleotide similarity to multiple GenBank entries purportedly representing different species or not sharing high similarity with any entries. Among Phytopythium taxa, Pp. vexans, which was recovered from all three site types, was the most frequently isolated species (77.9%), followed by Pp. helicoides (7.6%) and Pp. iriomotense (5.7%). Species-level identification could not be made for nine Phytopythium isolates originating from citrus soil and river water, and they are labelled here as Phytopythium sp. 1 (n = 5) and Phytopythium sp. 2 (n = 3) (Table 2).
Phytopythium sp. 2 shared 99% identity with sequences of undescribed Phytopythium species previously reported by Jung et al. (2020) in rivers in Vietnam (MN872739) and with another isolate obtained from forest soil in Poland (KC602492). BLASTn analysis of the cox2 sequences showed the closest match to Pp. helicoides (MN952211); however, they only shared 96.7% nucleotide identity, which is below the threshold expected for a member of the same species, based on other isolates in this study. A total of 11 Phytophthora taxa were obtained, with five represented by a single isolate.
Among the isolated Phytophthora spp., most isolates (n = 60; 78.9%) belonged to P. cinnamomi, followed by P. lagoariana (n = 3) and P. pini (n = 3). The majority of Phytophthora isolates were obtained from forest soils (81.6%), with only 17.1 and 1.3% from the river and agricultural soil samples, respectively. A total of six isolates appeared to belong to three undescribed species of Phytophthora, with the ITS sequence of P. sp. 1 grouping equally closely with P. pini and P. citricola (Figure 1). P. sp. 2 shared the highest nucleotide identity (92.3%) with a sequence of P. plurivora (KT693124) from forest soil in Hungary, followed by 92.2% shared identity with a sequence of P. polonica (KT693123). P. sp. 3 showed greater than 99% sequence identity with numerous taxa, including two putative hybrids: P. sp. zentmyerii × Peru4-like from Portugal (PQ238050) and P. sp. × Kunnunara-like from Taiwan (KU682602).
Pythium amaminum (n = 2) and Py. dissotocum (n = 1) were isolated from river water, while a third species, Py. sp. (n = 3), was isolated from both river water and citrus soil. This unidentified species could not be confirmed based on GenBank matches and may represent an undescribed species. In the phylogenetic analysis, it clustered closely with the reference isolate Py. torulosum (CBS 166.68_AY598634), despite 23 mismatches and 14 gaps between the two sequences (Figure 1). The three isolates of the unknown Pythium species shared ≥99.6% identity in cox2 sequences and ≥99.3% identity in ITS sequences. These high levels of sequence similarity justified their classification within the same species.
3.2 Phylogenetic analysis
The ITS alignment included 72 sequences (32 from this study) with 1,309 columns, 1,007 distinct patterns, 666 parsimony-informative sites, 147 singleton sites, and 495 constant sites. The best-fit model was TIM3 + F + I + G4. The ITS sequences of Phytopythium, Phytophthora, and Pythium spp. obtained in this study grouped with well-established reference isolates (Figure 1A). The two new Phytopythium species grouped with members of clades 2, such as Pp. fagopyri and Pp. palingenes. Among the undescribed Phytophthora species, P. sp. 1 clustered within clade 2, while P. sp. 2 and 3 fell within clade 9. The single undescribed Pythium species isolated grouped with Py. torulosum, which is part of clade B of this genus.
The cox2 alignment contained 47 sequences with 594 columns, 248 distinct patterns, 180 parsimony-informative sites, 58 singleton sites, and 356 constant sites. The best-fit model was TPM2u + F + I + R3. Few reference isolates had cox2 sequences available, so these were not included in the second phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1B). Despite this, the cox2 and ITS trees shared similar architecture (Figure 1).
4 Discussion
Vietnam has been a focus of oomycete surveys, especially for members of the genus Phytophthora (Jung et al., 2020; Dang et al., 2021), which is why it was chosen for this study. Although the original goal was to identify potentially new Phytophthora species, most isolates obtained in this study belonged to the Phytopythium genus. The majority of these were the known pathogen Pp. vexans (Baten et al., 2014), which was also reported in a similar oomycete-focused survey in Taiwan (Jung et al., 2017).
The high prevalence of Phytopythium spp. in this study is consistent with the reports of oomycete surveys conducted in agricultural areas (Parke et al., 2019; Navarro-Acevedo et al., 2021; Beluzan et al., 2022). Following collection, the isolates obtained in this study were maintained in culture for three years before being analyzed; therefore, Phytopythium may also have been better at surviving long-term storage.
The composition of Phytophthora, Phytopythium, and Pythium communities obtained via baiting may be influenced by the production practices of the agricultural fields sampled, as well as conditions during the baiting process, such as incubation temperature (Navarro-Acevedo et al., 2021). In addition, the use of a baiting step selects for plant-associated oomycete species, which may only comprise a fraction of all species present (Redekar et al., 2019). Unculturable species, such as P. cyperi (syn. Kawakamia cyperi [Thines et al., 2023]) and P. lepironiae, which can only survive within plant hosts, would not be detected in these studies (Jung et al., 2024; Bourret et al., 2025). In addition, some Phytophthora spp. produce few or no zoospores and may therefore be underrepresented when using soil baiting, the sole method used in the current study for soil isolations.
Phytopythium helicoides, one of the most well-known plant pathogens in the genus (Rezaei et al., 2021), was found in both agricultural and forest soils. New reports of Pp. helicoides pathogenicity have rapidly increased since the early 2010s across a wide range of hosts (Yang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Marin et al., 2019), including impactful stem rot on citrus (Chen et al., 2016). Commercial citrus production soils made up the majority of agricultural soil samples in the present study. However, verification of the pathogenicity of these isolates on plant hosts, particularly citrus, is needed to further demonstrate the potential impact of Pp. helicoides and other members of Pp clade 2 on agricultural systems.
Phytophthora spp. comprised the majority of non-Phytopythium isolates in the collection, especially members of clade 7 (Abad et al., 2023). The majority (61 of 66) of clade 7 isolates shared close (98% or more) cox2 identity with P. cinnamomi. This species has one of the broadest host ranges among all plant pathogens, a cosmopolitan distribution, and Southeast Asia has been suggested as its center of diversity (Shakya et al., 2021). One clade 7 Phytophthora hybrid, P. x cambivora, was recovered from river water; aquatic environments have been suggested by others as a Phytophthora hybridization court (Burgess, 2015; Oh et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014).
A greater number of taxa were recovered from the river samples, with over twice as many taxa as were found in forest and agricultural samples. Results from Kageyama et al. (2022) suggest that phytopathogenic oomycetes naturally inhabit rivers, which can then serve as important pathogen transmission routes to agricultural areas, where they cause disease outbreaks. For example, Pp. litorale, the pathogen responsible for root rot of apple (Malus domestica) and plane (Platanus orientalis), has previously been found at frequencies of up to 100% in irrigation water (Derviş et al., 2020; Mert et al., 2020; Redekar et al., 2019; Parkunan and Ji, 2013).
The high prevalence of Phytopythium in agricultural soils in this study could indicate an adaptation toward pathogenicity on crop plants. However, it could also be due to adaptation to the environmental and soil conditions created by agricultural practices. Land use has been found to affect numerous parameters, including the physicochemical properties of soil. Some studies have reported that natural forests have higher pH than cultivated lands (Muche et al., 2015), while the opposite pattern has been found in other studies (Dupouey et al., 2002; Ritter et al., 2003). Boie et al. (2024) found that oomycete species were significantly correlated with soil pH and organic content. They found higher species diversity in medium-textured soils compared to light or heavy soils. Although pH was not measured at the sites included in the study, the connection between pH and oomycete community composition is an area that warrants additional investigation.
This study shows that natural and agricultural areas in Vietnam harbor a wide diversity of oomycetes, including several undescribed species. Numerous undescribed species were detected, including a species of Phytopythium identified at multiple citrus production sites. The prevalence of Phytopythium spp. also suggests that its impact on tropical agricultural production areas may be underestimated. Further studies aimed at characterizing novel species and examining their roles as saprophytes versus pathogens will provide valuable information on potential emerging pathogens.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.
Author contributions
EP: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. GG: Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. LH: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. PQ: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. TW: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. AP: Writing – original draft, Validation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Data curation.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This project was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS) under appropriated project 8044-22000-052-00D. Sampling in Vietnam was supported by the USDA-ARS Office of International Research Engagement and Cooperation.
Conflict of interest
The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Author disclaimer
The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1606112/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
References
Abad, Z. G., Burgess, T. I., Redford, A. J., Bienapfl, J. C., Srivastava, S., Mathew, R., et al. (2023). IDphy: an international online resource for molecular and morphological identification of Phytophthora. Plant Dis. 107, 987–998. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-22-0448-FE,
Bala, K., Robideau, G. P., Lévesque, C. A., de Cock, A. W., Abad, Z. G., Lodhi, A. M., et al. (2010). Phytopythium Abad, de Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque, gen. Nov. and Phytopythium sindhum Lodhi, Shahzad & Lévesque, sp. nov. Persoonia 24, 136–137.
Baten, M. A., Asano, T., Motohashi, K., Ishiguro, Y., Rahman, M. Z., Inaba, S., et al. (2014). Phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species, and re-evaluation of Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov., recovered from damped-off buckwheat seedlings in Japan. Mycol. Prog. 13, 1145–1156. doi: 10.1007/s11557-014-1003-1
Beluzan, F., Miarnau, X., Torguet, L., Armengol, J., and Abad-Campos, P. (2022). Survey of oomycetes associated with root and crown rot of almond in Spain and pathogenicity of Phytophthora niederhauserii and Phytopythium vexans to ‘Garnem’ rootstock. Agriculture 12:294. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12020294
Boie, W., Schemmel, M., Ye, W., Hasler, M., Goll, M., Verreet, J. A., et al. (2024). An assessment of the species diversity and disease potential of Pythium communities in Europe. Nat. Commun. 15:8369.
Bourret, T. B., Blomquist, C. L., Mohan, S. K., Sampangi, R., Ho, H. H., and Mohammed, I. A. (2025). First detection of the obligate biotroph Phytophthora cyperi causing disease on yellow nutsedge in the United States, and establishment of molecular barcoding sequences for the species. PhytoFrontiers™ 5:60. doi: 10.1094/PHYTOFR-02-24-0013-R
Burgess, T. (2015). Molecular characterization of natural hybrids formed between five related indigenous clade 6 Phytophthora species. PLoS One 10:e0134225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134225,
Chen, X.-R., Liu, B.-B., Xing, Y.-P., Cheng, B.-P., Liu, M.-L., Tong, Y.-H., et al. (2016). Identification and characterization of Phytopythium helicoides causing stem rot of Shatangju mandarin seedlings in China. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 146, 715–727. doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-0952-4
Cooke, D. E. L., Drenth, A., Duncan, J. M., Wagels, G., and Brasier, C. M. (2000). A molecular phylogeny of Phytophthora and related oomycetes. Fungal Genet. Biol. 30, 17–32. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1202,
Dang, Q. N., Thu, P. Q., Arentz, F., St. Hardy, G. E., and Burgess, T. I. (2021). New Phytophthora species in clade 2a from the Asia-Pacific region including a re-examination of P. Colocasiae and P. meadii. Mycol. Prog. 20, 111–129. doi: 10.1007/s11557-020-01656-7
Derviş, S., Türkölmez, Ş., Çiftçi, O., Özer, G., Ulubaş Serçe, Ç., and Dikilitas, M. (2020). Phytopythium litorale: a novel killer pathogen of plane (Platanus orientalis) causing canker stain and root and collar rot. Plant Dis. 104, 2642–2648. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-20-0141-RE,
Dupouey, J. L., Dambrine, E., Laffite, J. D., and Moares, C. (2002). Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83, 2978–2984. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2978:IIOPLU]2.0.CO;2
Ghimire, B., and Baysal-Gurel, F. (2023). A diagnostic guide to Phytopythium helicoides and Phytopythium vexans causing root and crown rot diseases. Plant Health Progress 24, 527–538. doi: 10.1094/PHP-01-23-0003-DG
Ho, H. H. (2018). The taxonomy and biology of Phytophthora and Pythium. J. Bacteriol. Mycol. Open Access 6, 40–45. doi: 10.15406/jbmoa.2018.06.00174
Hudspeth, D. S., Nadler, S. A., and Hudspeth, M. E. (2000). A COX2 molecular phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes. Mycologia 92, 674–684. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2000.12061208
Judelson, H. S., and Ah-Fong, A. M. (2019). Exchanges at the plant-oomycete interface that influence disease. Plant Physiol. 179, 1198–1211. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00979,
Jung, T., Blaschke, H., and Oßwald, W. (2000). Involvement of soilborne Phytophthora species in central European oak decline and the effect of site factors on the disease. Plant Pathol. 49, 706–718. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2000.00521.x
Jung, T., Jung, M. H., Scanu, B., Seress, D., Kovacs, G. M., Maia, C., et al. (2017). Six new Phytophthora species from ITS clade 7a including two sexually functional heterothallic hybrid species detected in natural ecosystems in Taiwan. Persoonia 38, 100–135. doi: 10.3767/003158517X693615,
Jung, T., Milenković, I., Balci, Y., Janoušek, J., Kudláček, T., Nagy, Z. Á., et al. (2024). Worldwide forest surveys reveal forty-three new species in Phytophthora major clade 2 with fundamental implications for the evolution and biogeography of the genus and global plant biosecurity. Stud. Mycol. 107:251. doi: 10.3114/sim.2024.107.04
Jung, T., Scanu, B., Brasier, C. M., Webber, J., Milenkovic, I., Corcobado, T., et al. (2020). A survey in natural forest ecosystems of Vietnam reveals high diversity of both new and described Phytophthora taxa including P. ramorum. Forests 11:93. doi: 10.3390/f11010093
Kageyama, K., Hayano, A., Kikuchi, H., Otsubo, K., Suga, H., and Hieno, A. (2022). “Plant pathogenic oomycetes Inhabiting River water are a potential source of infestation in agricultural areas” in River Basin environment: Evaluation, management and conservation. eds. F. Li, Y. Awaya, K. Kageyama, and Y. Wei (Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore), 261–288.
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A., and Jermiin, L. S. (2017). ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285,
Kamoun, S., Furzer, O., Jones, J. D., Judelson, H. S., Ali, G. S., Dalio, R. J., et al. (2015). The top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 16, 413–434. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12190,
Katoh, K., and Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010,
Marano, A. V., Jesus, A. L., De Souza, J. I., Leaño, E. M., James, T. Y., Jerônimo, G. H., et al. (2014). A new combination in Phytopythium: P. Kandeliae (oomycetes, Straminipila). Mycosphere 5, 510–522. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/5/4/3
Marin, M. V., Seijo, T., Mertely, J., and Peres, N. A. (2019). First report of crown rot caused by Phytopythium helicoides on strawberry in the Americas. Plant Dis. 103:2696. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0658-PDN
Mert, F., Türkölmez, Ş., Özer, G., Derviş, S., and Çiftçi, O. (2020). First report of Phytopythium litorale causing root rot of apple in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 102, 1361–1362. doi: 10.1007/s42161-020-00641-z
Muche, M., Kokeb, A., and Molla, E. (2015). Assessing the physicochemical properties of soil under different land use types. J. Environ. Anal. Toxicol. 5:1. doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000309
Nam, B., and Choi, Y. J. (2019). Phytopythium and Pythium species (Oomycota) isolated from freshwater environments of Korea. Mycobiology 47, 261–227. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2019.1625174
Navarro-Acevedo, K. A., Wijeratne, S., Culman, S. W., Benitez, M. S., and Dorrance, A. E. (2021). The effect of incubation temperature on the species composition of Phytophthora, Phytopythium, and Pythium communities associated with soybean. Phytobiomes J. 5, 133–144. doi: 10.1094/pbiomes-01-20-0016-r
Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A., and Minh, B. Q. (2015). IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300,
Oh, E., Gryzenhout, M., Wingfield, B. D., Wingfield, M. J., and Burgess, T. I. (2013). Surveys of soil and water reveal a goldmine of Phytophthora diversity in south African natural ecosystems. IMA Fungus 4, 123–131. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.01.12,
Parke, J. L., Redekar, N. R., Eberhart, J. L., and Funahashi, F. (2019). Hazard analysis for Phytophthora species in container nurseries: three case studies. HortTechnology 29, 745–755. doi: 10.21273/horttech04304-19
Parkunan, V., and Ji, P. (2013). Isolation of Pythium litorale from irrigation ponds used for vegetable production and its pathogenicity on squash. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 35, 415–423. doi: 10.1080/07060661.2013.821423
Puglisi, I., De Patrizio, A., Schena, L., Jung, T., Evoli, M., Pane, A., et al. (2017). Two previously unknown Phytophthora species associated with brown rot of pomelo (Citrus grandis) fruits in Vietnam. PLoS One 12:e0172085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172085,
Redekar, N. R., Eberhart, J. L., and Parke, J. L. (2019). Diversity of Phytophthora, Pythium, and Phytopythium species in recycled irrigation water in a container nursery. Phytobiomes 3, 31–45. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-10-18-0043-R
Rezaei, S., Abrinbana, M., and Ghosta, Y. (2021). Taxonomic and pathogenic characterization of Phytopythium species from West Azarbaijan, Iran, and description of two new species. Mycologia 113, 612–628. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2020.1853986,
Ritter, E., Vesterdal, L., and Gundersen, P. (2003). Changes in soil properties after afforestation of former intensively managed soils with oak and Norway spruce. Plant Soil 249, 319–330. doi: 10.1023/a:1022808410732
Scott, P., Bader, M. K. F., Burgess, T., Hardy, G., and Williams, N. (2019). Global biogeography and invasion risk of the plant pathogen genus Phytophthora. Environ. Sci. Pol. 101, 175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.020
Shakya, S. K., Grunwald, N. J., Fieland, V. J., Knaus, B. J., Weiland, J. E., Maia, C., et al. (2021). Phylogeography of the wide-host range panglobal plant pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mol. Ecol. 30, 5164–5178. doi: 10.1111/mec.16109,
Thao, L. D., Khanh, T. N., Van Liem, N., Hien, L. T., Thanh, H. M., Binh, V. T. P., et al. (2024). Current species of oomycetes associated with foot rot disease of black pepper in Vietnam. Trop. Plant Pathol. 49, 633–648. doi: 10.1007/s40858-024-00662-4
Thines, M., Mishra, B., and Ploch, S. (2023). Multigene analyses with a broad sampling in Phytophthora and related genera provide evidence for the monophyly of downy mildews. Mycol. Prog. 22:82. doi: 10.1007/s11557-023-01932-2
Van Tran, Q., Ha, C. V., Vvedensky, V. V., and Han, V. C. (2023). Current status and characterization of Phytophthora species associated with gummosis of citrus in northern Vietnam. J. Phytopathol. 171, 478–488. doi: 10.1111/jph.13204
Wang, K. X., Xie, Y. L., Yuan, G. Q., Li, Q. Q., and Lin, W. (2015). First report of root and collar rot caused by Phytopythium helicoides on kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis). Plant Dis. 99:725. doi: 10.1094/pdis-08-14-0817-pdn
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., and Taylor, J. (1990). “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics” in PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. eds. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (San Diego CA USA: Academic Press), 315–322.
Yang, X., Richardson, P., and Hong, C. (2014). Phytophthora x stagnum nothosp. Nov., a new hybrid from irrigation reservoirs at ornamental plant nurseries in Virginia. PLoS One 9:e0103450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103450
Keywords: baiting, forests, genetic barcoding, natural ecosystems, rivers, soilborne oomycetes, Southeast Asia
Citation: Pfeufer EE, Groben G, Harrison L, Quang Thu P, Widmer T and Puig AS (2026) Oomycetes found in wild and cultivated areas of Vietnam. Front. Microbiol. 17:1606112. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1606112
Edited by:
Irfan Ali Phulpoto, Shah Abdul Latif University, PakistanReviewed by:
Santo Ángel Ortega Acosta, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, MexicoDavid Galo, Corteva Agriscience Johnston Global Business Center, United States
Copyright © 2026 Pfeufer, Groben, Harrison, Quang Thu, Widmer and Puig. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alina S. Puig, YWxpbmEucHVpZ0B1c2RhLmdvdg==