Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol.

Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems

This article is part of the Research TopicNew Insights into the Avian Gut MicrobiomesView all 13 articles

Light Intensity and Cage Position affect Meat Quality by Regulating Intestinal Flora, Inflammation and Oxidation in Broilers

Provisionally accepted
Fei  ZhangFei Zhang1Zhentiao  GaoZhentiao Gao1Fang  WangFang Wang1Yuyang  XueYuyang Xue1Shanshan  NanShanshan Nan1Wei  JingWei Jing1Yifan  NieYifan Nie1Tianyu  LuTianyu Lu1Xueqiang  LiuXueqiang Liu2Cunxi  NieCunxi Nie1*
  • 1Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
  • 2Xinjiang Chuangyu Poultry Farming Co., Ltd, shihezi, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: With improvements in living standards, high-quality food has become the preferred choice for high-quality living, leading to an increasing demand for chicken meat quality. Light intensity and cage position are crucial environmental factors in intensive farming systems and serve as environmental stressors linked to systemic inflammation and oxidative status in broilers. This study investigated the effects of light intensity and cage position on Jinling yellow-feather broiler meat quality. Methods: A total of 1,200 male yellow-feathered broilers were randomly assigned to a 2×3 factorial arrangement. Treatments included two light intensities (4 lx and 1.5 lx) and three cage positions (upper, middle, and lower). There were six treatment groups: 4 lx–upper (Ht), 4 lx–middle (Hm), 4 lx–lower (Hs), 1.5 lx–upper (Lt), 1.5 lx–middle (Lm), and 1.5 lx–lower (Ls). Each group contained 10 replicates (cages) with 20 broilers each. Results: The 4 lx treatment significantly improved pH, and meat color (p < 0.05) while reducing cooking loss and drip loss (p < 0.05). Breast muscle and leg muscle pH₂₄ₕ in the middle showed significantly higher than the upper (p < 0.05). Significant light × cage position interactions affected breast muscle pH24h, meat color, protein content, IMF, Tyr, and C16:0 (p < 0.05); leg muscle pH45min, pH24h, cooking loss, Glu, and SFA (p < 0.05). Briefly, the Ht and Hm groups had higher levels of meat quality. In terms of serum inflammatory status and oxidative levels, with the exception of GSH-Px, all indicators were significantly influenced by the interaction of light intensity × cage position. The Hm group had significantly higher IL-10 levels and total antioxidant capacity, indicating reduced systemic inflammation and enhanced antioxidant capacity. Furthermore, Alistipes and Barnesiella were significantly enriched in the Hm group, negatively correlated with cooking loss in the breast muscle, and positively correlated with T-AOC. Faecalibacterium, unclassified_f_Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcus_torques_group were negatively correlated with drip loss in both breast and leg muscles and positively with IL-10. Conclusions: These findings suggest that light intensity and cage position interact to affect meat quality, with observed improvements potentially linked to concomitant changes in gut microbiota, inflammation and oxidative status.

Keywords: Cage position, Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, light intensity, meat quality, Oxidation, Yellow-feathered broiler

Received: 21 Oct 2025; Accepted: 03 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Zhang, Gao, Wang, Xue, Nan, Jing, Nie, Lu, Liu and Nie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Cunxi Nie

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.