ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy
Wild-type MIC Distribution and Evaluation of Epidemiological Cut-Offs of Second-line TB-drugs in Susceptible and MDR-TB Clinical Isolates from Chennai, India
Azger Dusthackeer 1
Mahizhaveni Balasubramanian 1
Sam Ebenezer Rajadas 1,2
Christy Rosaline Nirmal 1,3
Padmasini Elango 1,4
Kannan Thiruvengadam 1,5
Shainaba A Saadhali 1
Siva Kumar Shanmugam 1
1. National Institute of Research in Tuberculosis (ICMR), Chennai, India
2. Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed to be University), Chennai, India
3. Achira Labs Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru, India
4. SIMATS Deemed University, Chennai, India
5. ICMR - Vector Control Research Centre, Indira Nagar, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: The rise of drug-resistant tuberculosis poses a significant challenge in patient management. Epidemiological cut-off values define drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In our previous study, we reported deviations from the WHO-recommended epidemiological cut-off values and identified subtherapeutic concentrations of rifampicin in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Building on these findings, the present study systematically evaluated the epidemiological cut-off values and pharmacodynamic profiles of newer and repurposed second-line antiTB drugs - Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Moxifloxacin, Linezolid, Clofazimine, Levofloxacin, and Pretomanid against the first-line drug-sensitive and isolates that are resistant to Rifampicin and Isoniazid from tuberculosis patients in and around Chennai. Method: The Broth microdilution-based Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility assay was employed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of the drugs against well-characterized wild-type and drug-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. The resulting MIC profiles were subsequently analyzed to delineate pharmacodynamic relationships underlying therapeutic efficacy and resistance development. Results and Discussion: Deviations from the World Health Organization–recommended epidemiological cut-off values were observed, with lower thresholds for delamanid and levofloxacin and higher concentrations for clofazimine and bedaquiline. These shifts indicate region-specific susceptibility patterns in Mycobacterium tuberculosis that have direct implications for the effective treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Inaccurate cut-off values may lead to misclassification of resistance, inappropriate regimen selection, and exposure to suboptimal drug concentrations, thereby compromising treatment efficacy and amplifying the risk of acquired resistance. Concordantly, pharmacodynamic analyses revealed sub-therapeutic exposure ranges for several newer and repurposed anti-TB drugs, underscoring the potential for treatment failure even in strains classified as susceptible. Collectively, these findings highlight the urgent need for regionally calibrated epidemiological cut-off values to optimize drug dosing, improve MDR-TB treatment outcomes, and strengthen resistance surveillance frameworks.
Summary
Keywords
Drug Resistance, Epidemiological cut-off values, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pharmacodynamics, second-line anti-TB drugs
Received
04 November 2025
Accepted
18 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Dusthackeer, Balasubramanian, Rajadas, Nirmal, Elango, Thiruvengadam, Saadhali and Shanmugam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Azger Dusthackeer
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.