Yong Long1,2,3,4
Wen Xiao2,3Yanpin Zhao2,3
Chao Yuan2Defeng Wang2Yang Yang2Chaozhi Su2
Pramote Paengkoum4Yong Han1,2*- 1Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
- 2Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, China
- 3Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction in the Plateau Mountainous Region, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
- 4School of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
by Long, Y., Xiao, W., Zhao, Y., Yuan, C., Wang, D., Yang, Y., Su, C., Paengkoum, P., and Han, Y. (2024). Front. Microbiol. 15:1347853. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1347853
There was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. The authors mistakenly used an image from another experiment showing PCoA and NMDS analyses in 11 replicates (n = 11) for each treatment group. The correct Figure 1 appears below.
Figure 1. Effects of different diets on rumen microorganisms of Guizhou black male goats. (A–E) Are ASV-Venn, Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) non-metric multidimensional scale analysis (NMDS), ASV-Circos, and ASV- Phylogenetic diagram analysis of I and II.
The details of the repetition count for the rumen microbial analysis were omitted from the Materials and Methods section. The first sentence in Section 2.5 Rumen fluid collection, rumen fermentation parameters, and rumen microbial testing, paragraph one has been edited as follows:
Sentence as published: On the morning of the end of the experiment, 2 h after the morning feeding, the rumen fluid was collected with a negative pressure collector, and the catheter was inserted into the oral esophagus until the middle of the rumen.
Revised Sentence: On the morning of the last day of the experiment, 2 h after feeding, six goats were randomly selected from the 11 goats in each group to collect rumen fluid using a negative-pressure sampler, with the tube inserted orally via the esophagus into the mid-rumen.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Generative AI statement
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: apparent digestibility, growth performance, rumen fermentation, rumen microorganisms, serum biochemical indicators
Citation: Long Y, Xiao W, Zhao Y, Yuan C, Wang D, Yang Y, Su C, Paengkoum P and Han Y (2026) Correction: Effects of Flammulina velutipes mushroom residues on growth performance, apparent digestibility, serum biochemical indicators, rumen fermentation and microbial of Guizhou black goat. Front. Microbiol. 17:1790100. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1790100
Received: 17 January 2026; Revised: 17 January 2026; Accepted: 23 January 2026;
Published: 11 February 2026.
Edited and reviewed by: Anusorn Cherdthong, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Copyright © 2026 Long, Xiao, Zhao, Yuan, Wang, Yang, Su, Paengkoum and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yong Han, c2hodWFuZzFAZ3p1LmVkdS5jbg==