In the original article, there was a mistake in the legends for Figures 3, 6 as published. The correlations between Q0 and α were incorrectly interpreted. The correct legend appears below. The authors apologize for these errors and state that these errors do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
FIGURE 3 |Q0 and α were positively correlated at high shock intensities. The relationship between Q0 and α was assessed in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (n = 13) at each shock intensity. (A) At 0.5 mA, Q0 and α were uncorrelated. (B,C) However, at 1.0 mA (B) and 2.0 mA (C), rats that experienced greater relief from shock cessation (high Q0) showed reduced motivation (high α).
FIGURE 6 | Relationship between relief (Q0) and motivation (α) differed between strains. The relationship between Q0 and α was assessed in Sprague Dawley (SD) and Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats for negative and positive reinforcement. (A) In SD rats (n = 8), Q0 was positively correlated with α, such that rats showing greatest relief from shock cessation (high Q0) demonstrated the least motivation to escape (high α). (B) In contrast to SD rats, WKY rats (n = 6) showed no correlation between relief and motivation for negative reinforcement. (C) Similar to negative reinforcement, a positive correlation was observed in SD rats (n = 11) between Q0 and α for sucrose. (D) A significant correlation of hedonic value and motivation for sucrose was not observed in WKY rats (n = 11).
In the original article, there was a mistake in the abstract. The correct abstract appears below.
Abnormal motivation and hedonic assessment of aversive stimuli are symptoms of anxiety and depression. Symptoms influenced by motivation and anhedonia predict treatment success or resistance. Therefore, a translational approach to the study of negatively motivated behaviors is needed. We describe a novel use of behavioral economics demand curve analysis to investigate negative reinforcement in animals that separates hedonic assessment of footshock termination (i.e., relief) from motivation to escape footshock. In outbred Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, relief increased as shock intensity increased. Likewise, motivation to escape footshock increased as shock intensity increased. To demonstrate the applicability to anxiety disorders, hedonic and motivational components of negative reinforcement were investigated in anxiety vulnerable Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats. WKY rats demonstrated increased motivation for shock cessation with no difference in relief as compared to control SD rats, consistent with a negative bias for motivation in anxiety vulnerability. Moreover, motivation was correlated with relief in SD, but not in WKY. This study is the first to assess the hedonic and motivational components of negative reinforcement using behavioral economic analysis. This procedure can be used to investigate positive and negative reinforcement in humans and animals to gain a better understanding of the importance of motivated behavior in stress-related disorders.
A correction has been made to Results, Demand Characteristics of Shock Cessation in SD rats: Exponential Demand Equation Analysis, Paragraph 2:
The relation between Q0 and α was assessed for negative reinforcement at each of the three different shock intensities. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive relation between Q0 and α at high, but not low, shock intensity (Figure 3). Q0 and α were significantly correlated at 1.0 mA (r = 0.584, p = 0.036) and 2.0 mA (r = 0.951, p < 0.001.), but not at 0.5 mA (r = 0.062, p > 0.1). Thus, SD rats modulated motivation to the hedonic value of negative reinforcement, but only at higher shock intensities.
The following corrections have been made to Results, Demand Characteristics of Negative and Positive Reinforcement in Anxiety Vulnerable Rats: Negative Reinforcement – Exponential Demand Equation, Paragraph 2:
Q0 and α were positively correlated in SD but not WKY rats. For SD rats, Q0 and α were significantly correlated at 1mA footshock (Figure 6A; r = 0.834, p = 0.01). In contrast, Q0 and α were not correlated for WKY rats (Figure 6B; r = −0.412, p > 0.1).
Hedonic value for sucrose and motivation to obtain sucrose were correlated for SD but not WKY rats. For SD rats, Q0 and α were significantly and positively correlated (Figure 6C; r = 0.956, p < 0.001). However, these two measures were not correlated in WKY rats (Figure 6D; r = 0.393, p > 0.1).
The authors apologize for these errors and state that these errors do not change the main scientific conclusions of the article.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
behavioral economics, anxiety disorders, exponential demand equation, motivation, anxiety, depression
Citation
Fragale JEC, Beck KD and Pang KCH (2017) Corrigendum: Use of the Exponential and Exponentiated Demand Equations to Assess the Behavioral Economics of Negative Reinforcement. Front. Neurosci. 11:376. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00376
Received
24 February 2017
Accepted
16 June 2017
Published
30 June 2017
Volume
11 - 2017
Edited and reviewed by
Hauke R. Heekeren, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Fragale, Beck and Pang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kevin C. H. Pang kevin.pang@va.gov
This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.