You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CORRECTION article

Front. Neurosci., 22 November 2022

Sec. Brain Imaging Methods

Volume 16 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1070425

Corrigendum: Absolute winding number differentiates mouse spatial navigation strategies with genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

  • 2. Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

  • 3. Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

  • 4. Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

  • 5. Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States

  • 6. Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States

  • 7. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

  • 8. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States

  • 9. Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States

Article metrics

View details

971

Views

512

Downloads

In the published article there was an error in the figures. Figure 2 was omitted, and Figure 3 was mistakenly used instead of Figure 2. The corrected Figure 2 appears below.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Learning trials. Mice swam shorter distances over the 5 testing days until reaching the hidden platform, indicating that they were learning (A,B). Meanwhile, the percentage time swam in the target quadrant increased with time (C,D). The absolute winding number clearly discriminated the APOE3 mice relative to APOE2 and APOE4 carriers, which used more similarly shaped trajectories (E,F). The effects were larger in females across the 5 days. F, female; M, male. Graphs show mean ± standard error.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

APOE, Alzheimer's disease, brain, mouse, connectivity, memory, MRI

Citation

Badea A, Li D, Niculescu AR, Anderson RJ, Stout JA, Williams CL, Colton CA, Maeda N and Dunson DB (2022) Corrigendum: Absolute winding number differentiates mouse spatial navigation strategies with genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Front. Neurosci. 16:1070425. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1070425

Received

14 October 2022

Accepted

09 November 2022

Published

22 November 2022

Volume

16 - 2022

Edited and reviewed by

Alexandra Petiet, INSERM U1127 Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), France

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Alexandra Badea

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics