Abstract
Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) is an uncommon ocular motility disorder that encompasses the following clinical signs: bilateral adduction deficits, bilateral abducting nystagmus, convergence lost, and a large angle exotropia in primary gaze. Here we report a case of a 55-year-old man presenting with atypical WEBINO syndrome with unilateral exotropia. The coverage test was used to record the patient's alternating exotropia. The patient experienced diplopia and ophthalmoplegia and was admitted to our hospital 3 days after the onset of the double vision. Neurologic examination showed left eye exotropia and bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia with impaired convergence. Vertical saccades of the left eye were also limited. Consequently, an MRI scan suggested an acute infarction in the left of the pontine tegmentum. The patient was finally diagnosed with pons infarction and was treated with anticoagulation and anti-platelet aggregation therapy.
Case presentation
A 55-year-old man experienced diplopia and ophthalmoplegia and was admitted to our hospital 3 days after the onset of the double vision. He had a history of hypertension for more than 20 years. His highest blood pressure was 180/104 mmHg. Neurologic examination and cover test showed exotropia of the left eye, alternating exotropia, and bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia with impaired convergence. Vertical saccades and smooth pursuit of the left eye were also limited (see Supplementary Video). Pupillary, levator function, and bilateral abducent nucleus were normal. No other positive signs of the nervous system were found in physical examination. Besides, no abnormalities were found after liver and kidney function checks, blood tests, and the coagulation markers detection. Moreover, no abnormality was found in the levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HbcAb), hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg), anti-hepatitis B e antibody (anti-HBe), anti-hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV), anti-treponema pallidum (anti-TP) antibody, anti-streptolysin O (ASO), rheumatoid factor (RF), C-reactive protein (CRP), and the autoantibodies. The lumbar puncture showed that the pressure was about 120 mmH2O, and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was normal. Consequently, the patient underwent an MRI scan, which suggests an acute infarction in the left of the pontine tegmentum involving the left medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) (Figure 1). The patient was finally diagnosed with pons infarction.
Figure 1
The patient received anticoagulation and anti-platelet aggregation therapy. There was no stroke recurrence, and diplopia returned to a healthy level after the patient's discharge from the hospital 6 months.
Discussion
Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia is a syndrome that involves bilateral adduction deficits, bilateral abducting nystagmus, and a large angle exotropia in primary gaze (Sharpe et al., 1974). WEBINO is mainly caused by cerebrovascular disorders (CVD), multiple sclerosis, neurodegenerative disorders, and infections (Sakamoto et al., 2012). WEBINO syndrome caused by CVD has been reported by several studies (Chen and Lin, 2007). Studies have shown that the disease is often associated with brainstem ischemia and hydrocephalus, immunotherapy of tumors, and diseases such as multiple sclerosis. This study summarized 39 case reports, including 42 WEBINO patients (Inocencio and Ballecer, 1985; Lana et al., 1990; Fay and Strominger, 1999; Korkmaz et al., 2002; Ozer et al., 2005; Chen and Lin, 2007; Kim et al., 2008; Matsumoto et al., 2008, 2019; Ushio et al., 2008; Jacob et al., 2010; Sierra-Hidalgo et al., 2010; Shinoda et al., 2011; Beh and Frohman, 2012; Jadhav and Prasad, 2012; Sakamoto et al., 2012; Bar et al., 2014; Chakravarthi et al., 2014; de Mora et al., 2014; Mathis et al., 2014; Muralidhar et al., 2014; Nakajima et al., 2014; Toufeeq and Dave, 2014; Agarwal et al., 2015; Ljevak et al., 2015; Man et al., 2015; de Souza et al., 2017; Sajjadi et al., 2017; Zou and Chen, 2017; Keereman et al., 2018; Papageorgiou et al., 2018; Im et al., 2020; Vázquez-Justes et al., 2020; Yazdi et al., 2020; Ansari et al., 2021; Jo et al., 2021; Petrik et al., 2021; Sinha et al., 2021; Wako et al., 2022). The age range of the patients was 12–85 years; 26 were male (61.9%), 15 were female (35.7%), and the gender of one was unknown. In the analysis of the clinical data of neuro-ophthalmological signs in WEBINO patients, 37 (88.1%) cases of exotropia in the first eye-position, 38 (90.5%) cases of bilateral intraocular disorders, 22 (52.4%) cases of convergence barrier, six (14.3%) cases of blepharoptosis, 18 (42.9%) cases of vertical gaze disorder, six (14.3%) cases of vertical nystagmus, eight (19.0%) cases of pupillary anomalies, and two (4.8%) cases of reversed dip. Among the studies, the lesion site summary showed that 28 (66.7%) cases occurred in the midbrain, 14 (33.3%) in the pons, nine (21.4%) in both the midbrain and the pons, and one (2.4%) in the brainstem. Among the causes of morbidity in WEBINO patients, 26 (61.9%) had cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, ten (23.8%) neurological diseases, three (7.1%) infectious diseases, two (4.8%) tumor-related diseases, one (2.4%) alcohol overdose, and one (2.4%) drug-immune reaction. More details are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| Case (references) | Patient | Age | Gender | Neuro-ocular signs | Etiology | Occlusion site | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aa | Bb | Cc | Dd | Ee | Ff | Gg | Hh | ||||||
| 1. Inocencio and Ballecer (1985) | 1 | 24 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | CNS MTI | Mid, Pons |
| 2. Lana et al. (1990) | 1 | 35 | F | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | CNS vasculitis | – |
| 3. Fay and Strominger (1999) | 1 | 33 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | CNS Cry | Mid |
| 4. Korkmaz et al. (2002) | 1 | 14 | F | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | CIDP | – |
| 5. Ozer et al. (2005) | 1 | 15 | M | Y | – | – | – | – | – | Y | N | DAD | Mid, Pons |
| 6. Chen and Lin (2007) | 4 | 66 | M | Y | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | N | CI | Mid |
| 84 | M | Y | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | N | CI | Mid, Pons | ||
| 51 | F | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | Hyd, brainstem neoplasms | Mid, Pons | ||
| 65 | F | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | CI | Pons | ||
| 7. Kim et al. (2008) | 1 | 78 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | CI | Mid |
| 8. Matsumoto et al. (2008) | 1 | 72 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | PSP | Mid |
| 9. Ushio et al. (2008) | 1 | 72 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | PSP | Mid |
| 10. Jacob et al. (2010) | 1 | 67 | M | Y | – | – | – | – | N | N | N | Hyd, SAH | – |
| 11. Sierra-Hidalgo et al. (2010) | 1 | 55 | F | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | N | CI | Mid |
| 12. Shinoda et al. (2011) | 1 | 19 | F | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | Y | N | NMOSD | Mid |
| 13. Beh and Frohman (2012) | 1 | 69 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | CI | Mid, Pons |
| 14. Jadhav and Prasad (2012) | 1 | 41 | M | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | N | Hyd, CM | – |
| 15. Sakamoto et al. (2012) | 1 | 64 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | CI | Pons |
| 16. Bar et al. (2014) | 1 | 12 | F | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | Dem | Mid |
| 17. Chakravarthi et al. (2014) | 1 | 64 | F | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | CI | Mid |
| 18. Mathis et al. (2014) | 1 | 68 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | CI | Pons |
| 19. Muralidhar et al. (2014) | 1 | 35 | M | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | Alcohol | - |
| 20. Nakajima et al. (2014) | 1 | 68 | M | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | CI | Mid, Pons |
| 21. de Mora et al. (2014) | 1 | 57 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | CI, Neurosyphilis | Mid |
| 22. Toufeeq and Dave (2014) | 1 | 13 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | N | Pineal tumor | Mid |
| 23. Agarwal et al. (2015) | 1 | 19 | F | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | CI | Mid, Pons |
| 24. Ljevak et al. (2015) | 1 | 53 | M | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | CI | Mid |
| 25. Man et al. (2015) | 1 | 84 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | CI | Mid |
| 26. de Souza et al. (2017) | 1 | 60 | F | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | PSP | Mid |
| 27. Sajjadi et al. (2017) | 1 | 38 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | – | – |
| 28. Zou and Chen, 2017) | 1 | 70 | F | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | NMOSD | Mid |
| 29. Papageorgiou et al. (2018) | 1 | 65 | M | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | CI | Mid |
| 30. Keereman et al. (2018) | 1 | 25 | F | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | Hyd | – |
| 31. Matsumoto et al. (2019) | 1 | 81 | M | N | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | PSP | Mid |
| 32. Yazdi et al. (2020) | 1 | 57 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | PSP | Mid, Pons |
| 33. Vázquez-Justes et al. (2020) | 1 | 68 | M | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | Ischemic lesion | Mid |
| 34. Im et al. (2020) | 1 | 62 | F | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | Stroke | Pons |
| 35. Petrik et al. (2021) | 1 | 55 | M | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | CH | Pons |
| 36. Jo et al. (2021) | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | CI | Mid |
| 37. Sinha et al. (2021) | 1 | 48 | F | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | N | CH | Brainstem |
| 38. Ansari et al. (2021) | 1 | 45 | F | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | irEA | – |
| 39. Wako et al. (2022) | 1 | 85 | M | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | CES | Mid, Pons, Cer |
Analysis of clinical data of WEBINO patients.
Aa, Exotropia in the first eye-position; Bb, Bilateral Intraocular Disorders; Cc, Convergence barrier; Dd, Blepharoptosis; Ee, Vertical gaze disorder; Ff, Vertical nystagmus; Gg, Pupillary anomalies; Hh, Reversed dip. M, Male; F, Female; Y, yes; N, No; CI, Cerebral infarction; CH, Cerebral hemorrhage; Mid, Midbrain; Cer, cerebellum; Cry, Cryptococcosis infection; MTI, Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection; CNS, Central nervous system; CIDP, Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; Hyd, Hydrocephalus; DAD, Diffuse axonal damage; PSP, Progressive superanuclear palsy; CES, cardioembolic stroke; SAH, Subarachnoid hemorrhage; NMOSD, Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; CM, Cryptococcal meningitis; Dem, Demyelinating Diseases; irEA, Immune related adverse event.
Here we reported a single case of a patient with atypical WEBINO with unilateral exotropia (Supplementary Video) as the main clinical manifestation. The dissociated abducting nystagmus, impaired convergence, and supranuclear vertical gaze palsy implied a lesion of bilateral MLF. Yet, most of the infarcts in the left median dorsal pons cause unilateral, not bilateral, lesion of MLF (Gossman, 2006). The mechanism for the atypical clinical presentation in this patient may be due to the proximity of the unilateral lesion to the midline resulting in bilateral MLF lesions combined with converging fiber involvement resulting in WEBINO. Still, the causal pathophysiology remains unclear and disputed.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Harrison International Peace Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
JH and TW organized and proofread the writing of the manuscript. DC and TW wrote the manuscript draft. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.974645/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AgarwalA.VyasS.BanzalS.JhaR. K. (2015). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Neurol. India63:444. 10.4103/0028-3886.158263
2
AnsariJ.MohmmedY. E.Ghazal-AswadS.AnsariH.AkhterS. M.HadidO. H.et al. (2021). Rare case of chemotherapy-refractory metastatic vaginal squamous cell carcinoma with complete response to concurrent pembrolizumab and radiotherapy-case report and literature review. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep.38:100878. 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100878
3
BarA.UrbineJ.BahoraY.BerkenstockM.VodzakJ.GuruprasadH.et al. (2014). 12-year-old African American girl with subacute bilateral ophthalmoplegia. In: Seminars in Pediatric Neurology (Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier), 173–176.
4
BehS. C.FrohmanE. M. (2012). WEBINO and the return of the King's Speech. J. Neurol. Sci.315, 153–155. 10.1016/j.jns.2011.11.035
5
ChakravarthiS.KesavP.KhuranaD. (2014). Wall-eyed bilateral inter nuclear ophthalmoplegia with vertical gaze palsy. QJM107, 165–165. 10.1093/qjmed/hct021
6
ChenC. M.LinS. H. (2007). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia from lesions at different levels in the brainstem. J. Neuroophthalmol.27, 9–15. 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3180334e8d
7
de MoraM. R. C.MorenoG. R.ContrerasM. E. (2014). Webino syndrome caused by meningovascular syphilis. a rare entity with an unexpected cause. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.89, 199–202. 10.1016/j.oftale.2014.07.001
8
de SouzaL. C.ResendeE. D. P. F.MagalhãesD.TeixeiraA. L.GomezR. S. (2017). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophtalmoplegia (WEBINO) in a patient with Richardson's syndrome-Progressive supranuclear palsy. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.41, 121–123. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.05.006
9
FayP. M.StromingerM. B. (1999). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia in central nervous system cryptococcosis. J. Neuroophthalmol.19, 131–135. 10.1097/00041327-199906000-00052
10
GossmanM. (2006). Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. Philadelphia, PA: LWW.
11
ImK.JuH.LeeM.RohH. A. (2020). Case report of wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia with bilateral facial Palsy. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.29, 105–139. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105139
12
InocencioF. P.BallecerR. (1985). Tuberculosis granuloma in the midbrain causing wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (Webino). J. Clin. Neuroophthalmol.5, 31–35.
13
JacobJ. T.BurnsJ. A.DupontS. A.LanzinoG.WijdicksE. F. (2010). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia after ruptured aneurysm. Arch. Neurol.67, 636–637. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.60
14
JadhavA. P.PrasadS. (2012). Rapid reversal of wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Arch. Neurol.69, 405–405. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.995
15
JoY. -S.HongJ. Y.KimS. Y.NaS. -J. (2021). Wall-Eyed Bilateral Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) in a patient with a unilateral midbrain infarction. Neurologist26, 153–155. 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000332
16
KeeremanV.PlatteauE.CrevitsL.AlgoedL. (2018). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurologist23, 157–159. 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000192
17
KimJ.JeongS. -H.OhY -M.YangY. S.KimS. (2008). Teaching NeuroImage: Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) from midbrain infarction. Neurology70:e35. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000299904.48116.cf
18
KorkmazA.TopalogluH.KansuT. (2002). Wall eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Eur. J. Neurol.9, 691–692. 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00447_5.x
19
LanaM. A.MoreiraP. R. R.NevesL. B. (1990). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (Webino syndrome) and myelopathy in pyoderma gangrenosum. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr.48, 497–501. 10.1590/S0004-282X1990000400016
20
LjevakJ.MišmašA.PoljakovićZ.HabekM. (2015). Bilateral ptosis with wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia and vertical gaze paralysis. Neurol. Sci.36, 473–475. 10.1007/s10072-014-1838-x
21
ManB. L.ChiM. S.FuY. P. (2015). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplaegia (WEBINO) from a paramedian mesencephalic infarct. Case Rep.2015:bcr2014207240. 10.1136/bcr-2014-207240
22
MathisT.DucrayF.TiliketeC.VighettoA.BiottiD. (2014). Pontine infarction responsible for wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia syndrome. Neurol. Clin. Pract.4, 524–525. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000063
23
MatsumotoH.InabaT.KakumotoT.MiyanoR.UchioN.SakuraiY.et al. (2019). Progressive supranuclear palsy with wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia syndrome: authors' second case. Case Rep. Neurol.11, 205–208. 10.1159/000501394
24
MatsumotoH.OhminamiS.GotoJ.TsujiS. (2008). Progressive supranuclear palsy with walleyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia syndrome. Arch. Neurol.65, 827–829. 10.1001/archneur.65.6.827
25
MuralidharR.ChandrasekharC.RamamurthyD.KanthappanP. (2014). WEBINO after binge drinking. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus51, 256–256. 10.3928/01913913-20140604-04
26
NakajimaN.UedaM.KatayamaY. (2014). Brainstem infarction with wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia syndrome and vertical one-and-a-half syndrome. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.23, e291–e293. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.012
27
OzerF.MutluA.MeralH.KansuT.CarsancakliB. (2005). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophtalmoplegia presenting as monocular alternating nystagmus: a non-epileptic phenomenon in a case of diffuse axonal injury. Epilept. Disord.7, 53–56.
28
PapageorgiouE.TsironiE. E.AndroudiS.KoltsidopoulosP. (2018). Teaching video neuroimages: pulsatile proptosis and wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Neurology90, e1542–e1543. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006462
29
PetrikS.LambeckJ.BardutzkyJ. (2021). WEBINO syndrome caused by bilateral pontine microhemorrhages. Deutsches Ärzteblatt Int.118:729. 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0080
30
SajjadiM.SonbolestanS. A.AbtahiS. M. A.AbtahiZ. S. (2017). Transposition surgery for WEBINO. Int. Ophthalmol.37, 271–274. 10.1007/s10792-016-0235-2
31
SakamotoY.KimuraK.IguchiY.ShibazakiK.MikiA. A. (2012). small pontine infarct on DWI as a lesion responsible for wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia syndrome. Neurol. Sci.33, 121–123. 10.1007/s10072-011-0647-8
32
SharpeJ. A.RosenbergM. A.HoytW. F.DaroffR. B. (1974). Paralytic pontine exotropia: a sign of acute unilateral pontine gaze palsy and internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Neurology24, 1076–1076. 10.1212/WNL.24.11.1076
33
ShinodaK.MatsushitaT.FurutaK.IsobeN.YonekawaT.OhyagiY.et al. (2011). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) syndrome in a patient with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and anti-aquaporin-4 antibody. Multiple Scler. J.17, 885–887. 10.1177/1352458510391690
34
Sierra-HidalgoF.Moreno-RamosT.VillarejoA.Martín-GilL.de Pablo-FernándezE.Correas-CalleroE.et al. (2010). A variant of WEBINO syndrome after top of the basilar artery stroke. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg.112, 801–804. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.06.004
35
SinhaS.NaikB. B.GhanekarJ. (2021). Wall eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) syndrome as a false localising sign in intracranial haemorrhage due to snake bite. BMJ Case Rep.14, e244830. 10.1136/bcr-2021-244830
36
ToufeeqA.DaveD. (2014). Surgical management of WEBINO syndrome following pineal gland lesion removal. Eye28, 352–353. 10.1038/eye.2013.286
37
UshioM.IwasakiS.ChiharaY.MurofushiT. (2008). Wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia in a patient with progressive supranuclear palsy. J. Neuroophthalmol.28, 93–96. 10.1097/WNO.0b013e318175ccfe
38
Vázquez-JustesD.Martín-CucóA.Gallego-SánchezY.Vicente-PascualM. (2020). WEBINO syndrome (wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia) secondary to ischemic stroke, about a case. Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol.95, 205–208. 10.1016/j.oftale.2019.12.008
39
WakoS.ToiS.MizunoT.NishimuraA.IshizukaK.KitagawaK. A.et al. (2022). Case of cardioembloic stroke with wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia (WEBINO) syndrome. Clin. Neurol.62, 541–545. (2022). 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001701
40
YazdiN.GhamsariM. R.ShoeibiA.RohaniM. (2020). Diplopia in progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract.7:232. 10.1002/mdc3.12890
41
ZouZ.ChenW. (2017). Can Wernekink commissure syndrome and wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia be ascribed to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder?Neurol. Sci.38, 2053–2055. 10.1007/s10072-017-3041-3
Summary
Keywords
wall-eyed internuclear ophthalmoplegia acute infarction, magnetic resonance imaging, pons, infarction, case
Citation
Wang T, Cao D and Han J (2022) Case report: A variant of wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia from unilateral pons infarction. Front. Neurosci. 16:974645. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.974645
Received
21 June 2022
Accepted
09 August 2022
Published
09 September 2022
Volume
16 - 2022
Edited by
Sudhir Kumar Pathak, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Reviewed by
Chirag Kamal Ahuja, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), India; Meng Hsien Yong, Universiti Kebangsaaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Wang, Cao and Han.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jingzhe Han 420612049@qq.com
This article was submitted to Neurodegeneration, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.