Abstract
The heart and brain have bi-directional influences on each other, including autonomic regulation and hemodynamic connections. Heart rate variability (HRV) measures variation in beat-to-beat intervals. New findings about disorganized sinus rhythm (erratic rhythm, quantified as heart rate fragmentation, HRF) are discussed and suggest overestimation of autonomic activities in HRV changes, especially during aging or cardiovascular events. When excluding HRF, HRV is regulated via the central autonomic network (CAN). HRV acts as a proxy of autonomic activity and is associated with executive functions, decision-making, and emotional regulation in our health and wellbeing. Abnormal changes of HRV (e.g., decreased vagal functioning) are observed in various neurological conditions including mild cognitive impairments, dementia, mild traumatic brain injury, migraine, COVID-19, stroke, epilepsy, and psychological conditions (e.g., anxiety, stress, and schizophrenia). Efforts are needed to improve the dynamic and intriguing heart-brain interactions.
1. Introduction
The heart and brain connect via both electrical and hemodynamic interactions (Figure 1). For example, vagal nerves innervate the heart and mainly target the sinoatrial (SA) node and atrioventricular (AV) node, release acetylcholine upon activation, and decelerate heart rate; while sympathetic nerves project to the SA node, AV node, and most cardiac muscles, release norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) upon activation, and accelerate heart rate (; Shaffer et al., 2014). The speed at which the molecular signals of each branch are processed influence the speed at which the heart rhythm is affected (). Beat-to-beat variation is more affected by the rapid release and termination of acetylcholine neurotransmission of the vagus nerve. Sympathetic nerves release norepinephrine, which is slower to release and slower to act as it relies on a second messenger in the signaling pathway, therefore affecting the heart rhythm across several beats (Russo et al., 2017). As for signaling from the heart to the brain, over 80% of vagal nerves are afferent and send impulses to the brain (). Sympathetic afferent nerves send autonomic signals to the dorsal root ganglia. Vagal and sympathetic afferent nerves project to both subcortical and cortical regions including brainstem, hypothalamus, thalamus, amygdala, and cerebral cortex (; ).
FIGURE 1
Aside from electrical connections, reciprocal hemodynamic connections exist between the heart and the brain. The heart pumps blood which provides oxygen and nutrients to the brain; conversely, deoxygenated blood flows back to the heart from the brain for re-oxygenation through the pulmonary circulation. Reduced cardiac function, as occurs in heart failure secondary to conditions such as myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, or valvular heart disease, can result in reduced cerebral blood flow, affecting cognitive function, and contributing to dementia risk (; ). Reduction of forward cardiac output due to arrhythmias including chronic atrial fibrillation can reduce cerebral blood flow, leading to cognitive dysfunction (). The development of blood clots within the chambers of the heart can contribute to embolic stroke. Atherosclerotic lesions in the aorta and carotid arteries can inhibit blood flow to the brain, and if they dislodge, result in embolic stroke. Hypertension within the vascular system can result in lacunar infarcts to the brain. Thus, a number of cardiovascular hemodynamic conditions can affect cerebral function (; ).
These bi-directional electrical and hemodynamic connections between the heart and the brain support physiological, psychological, and cognitive health and influence our physical, mental, and social health (; Salomon et al., 2017; ). For example, stress from natural disasters such as earthquake or a pandemic were associated with increased cardiac death and myocardial infarction (; ; ; Rollman et al., 2021). Alternatively, heart-brain dysfunction can also be triggered by unnatural factors such as sporting events, when emotionally devoted fans of a Super Bowl game showed increased cardiac death associated with loss by their home teams (). Another heart-brain dysfunction example concerns the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), where higher Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score is associated with increased cerebral infarction, cerebral atherosclerosis, and AD pathology (Song et al., 2021).
1.1. Heart rate variability (HRV)
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of the variability of beat-to-beat interval (R-R interval) putatively resulting from the dynamic interactions between sympathetic and parasympathetic activities (; ). HRV is analyzed from short-term 1 or 5-min electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings of participants at rest and seated in a laboratory setting. Other durations of ECG recordings (long-term such as 24-h) or positions (such as supine) are used based on testing needs. Software used for analysis includes, but is not limited to, Kubios, Biopac, LabChart, or in-house developed codes (such as in MATLAB). The ectopic beats are usually removed before the HRV analysis, since only sinus beats are believed to reflect signals from the brain conducted by autonomic circuits. Recent studies suggested erratic sinus arrhythmia, independent of autonomic regulation, contribute to HRV. These erratic rhythms need to be excluded before autonomic regulation can be interpreted from traditional HRV analysis (, ).
1.1.1. Traditional HRV analysis in time and frequency domain
Heart rate variability measurements using linear methods are usually analyzed in the time domain as R-R intervals (RR), heart rate (HR), standard deviation of the normal-to-normal (NN) interval (SDNN), root mean squared successive differences (RMSSD), and the percentage of the number of changes in successive normal sinus (NN) intervals that exceed 50 ms (pNN50). In the frequency domain, HRV measures are analyzed as high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), very low frequency (VLF), and ultra-low frequency (ULF). Non-linear HRV analysis, including Poincare plots, Power Law Exponent, Approximate Entropy, non-linear prediction, symbolization, phase synchronization, and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis, are less commonly used and are beyond the scope of this review (; Voss et al., 2015).
Overall, RMSSD and HF reflect vagal inputs to the heart. For example, higher HF, RMSSD, or pNN50 indicates higher vagal functioning, while decreased levels suggest lower vagal activity (Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017). The ratio of low- and high-frequency power (LF/HF) has been used to estimate the sympatho-vagal balance. However, this concept was disproven by Dr. Billman and others who argued that LF reflected a complex mix of sympathetic, parasympathetic, as well as other unidentified components, and LF/HF was affected by respiration and heart rate independent of autonomic nerve activity (; von Rosenberg et al., 2017). Therefore, results with symptho-vagal balance interpretation of LF/HF are not further considered in this review.
Standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval is a marker of total heart rate variability and is influenced more by sympathetic activity than other HRV measures. Additionally, VLF and ULF are usually analyzed from 24-h ECG, and have putatively been linked with circadian rhythm, core body temperature, metabolism, and sleep cycle; but research on VLF and ULF have been limited (Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017; Table 1). The term “vagal tone” in HRV was derived from previous studies of vagal activity modulation. Examples include direct vagal nerve stimulation induced decreased HRV (Rosenblueth and Simeone, 1934), or increase or decrease in HRV by blockade of autonomic nerve transmission by targeting either the β-adrenergic receptors or the muscarinic receptors, of the sympathetic or parasympathetic systems, respectively (; ; ). We use the term “vagal functioning” instead of “vagal tone” in this review, as additional components of HRV have been reported in the last decades. HRV reflects respiratory activity (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, or RSA) and blood pressure fluctuation (known as Mayer wave ∼0.1 Hz) (Zeng et al., 2018; ).
TABLE 1
| Parameter | Unit | Description |
| SDNN | ms | Standard deviation of NN intervals |
| pNN50 | % | Percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms |
| RMSSD | ms | Root mean square of successive RR interval differences |
| ULF power | ms2 | Absolute power of the ultra-low-frequency band (=0.003 Hz) |
| VLF power | ms2 | Absolute power of the very-low-frequency band (0.0033–0.04 Hz) |
| LF power | ms2 | Absolute power of the low-frequency band (0.04–0.15 Hz) |
| LF power | nu | Relative power of the low-frequency band (0.04–0.15 Hz) in normal units |
| HF power | ms2 | Absolute power of the high-frequency band (0.15–0.4 Hz) |
| HF power | nu | Relative power of the high-frequency band (0.15–0.4 Hz) in normal units |
| LF/HF | % | Ratio of LF-to-HF power |
| PIP | % | Percentage of inflection points for R-R interval |
Traditional HRV time-domain and frequency-domain measures and heart rate fragmentation measures.
NN intervals, interbeat intervals from which artifacts have been removed; RR intervals, interbeat intervals between all successive heartbeats. ms, milliseconds; ms2, ms squared; nu, normal units; PIP, the percentage of inflection points. Adapted from Tables 1, 2 of Shaffer and Ginsberg (2017) and , .
1.1.2. Heart rate fragmentation (HRF)
Complicated contributors to beat-to-beat variations suggest that the classical HRV as a proxy of sympathetic-parasympathetic balance may be over-interpreted, at least in some situations (). For example, autonomic regulation is not associated with non-respiratory sinus arrhythmia or erratic sinus rhythm. The erratic rhythm is different from vagal functioning and potentially confounds the prognostic role of traditional time and frequency HRV analysis (; ). Costa et al. have introduced heart rate fragmentation (HRF) analysis, such as percentage of inflection points (PIP) (Table 1), to differentiate between the erratic rhythm and autonomic regulation (, ). Erratic sinus rhythm evaluation through non-linear analysis, such as Poincare plots, short-term fractal scaling exponent, is beyond the scope of this review (Stein et al., 2008).
Heart rate fragmentation increased with aging and provided additive value or independent information for classical HRV changes in cardiovascular conditions, such as coronary artery disease or adverse cardiovascular events (; ; ). In the same study of atherosclerosis, also reported that increased HRF during sleep reflected and predicted decreased global cognitive performance (by Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument, CASI) and processing speed (by digit symbol coding, DSC).
In this review, although our focus is on RR, HR, RMSSD, SDNN, HF, and LF, it will be important in future studies to clarify the role of HRF vs. autonomic contributions to HRV.
1.1.3. HRV and age, sex, and heart rate
Heart rate variability measures are affected by age and sex. A study of HRV including 1,743 participants ranging from 40 to 100 years old demonstrated that SDNN decreases with age, while RMSSD decreases from 40 to 60 years of age and then increases after 60–70 years of age. Females presented with lower SDNN but with higher RMSSD values than males; and individuals with diabetes presented lower RMSSD and SDNN in both sexes (). Another study with over 63,000 participants showed that females presented with higher heart rate and HF (vagal activity) compared to males (). Voss’s group studied HRV (time domain, frequency domain, and non-linear methods) in 1,906 participants (782 females and 1,124 males) ranging from 25 to 74 years. They reported that in general age influences were stronger than gender influences: SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF decreased with age in both genders up to 64 years of age. Females (in comparison to males) presented lower LF and increase HF, which disappeared after 44 years (LF) or 54 years of age (HF) (Voss et al., 2015). The idea that RMSSD increases after 60–70 years of age could not only be attributed to vagal functioning, but could also reflect erratic rhythm or increased heart rate fragmentation (). Thus, HRV studies considering sex difference and age will be helpful in improving HRV reproducibility and replicability, and caution is needed to interpret those changes, especially when studies involve older participants.
Heart rate variability may also be affected by HR, itself. A study of 36 young healthy volunteers inferred that HRV depends more on heart rate (HR) than respiratory rate, and the removal of HR impact improves HRV repeatability (). However, the clinical significance of the predictive value of HRV can be either dependent or independent of HR. For example, higher HR itself is a risk factor for cognitive decline (). Consequently, heart rate correction is not routinely used in all forms of HRV analysis.
1.2. HRV and brain
There is increased interest in the link between HRV and cognition (Figure 2). The purpose of this report is to summarize knowledge about links between HRV and cognition, their interactions during physiological state and neurological conditions, potential mechanisms underlying the links, and potentials ways to improve overall health through the links.
FIGURE 2
2. Method
We reviewed the literature on PubMed/Google Scholar database in order to determine the current literature dealing with the link between HRV and cognition. Inclusion criteria were based on key search items, “heart rate variability,” “cognition,” and “dementia” “Alzheimer’s disease,” “traumatic brain injury,” “migraine,” “COVID-19,” “stroke,” “epilepsy,” “psychological conditions,” and “inhibitory control.” Additional search items include “erratic rhythm” and “heart rate fragmentation.” The authors reviewed the citations from review papers involving HRV (linear analysis) and cognition. The final reference list was generated based on relevance to the topics covered in this review. Please note that here we only peek through the lens of “HRV-cognition” to study the heart-brain connection. Due to the complexity of this topic, we may not have included all studies that are relevant to this field.
3. HRV changes and neurological status
3.1. Physiological conditions
Heart rate variability directly and indirectly affects decision-making related to overall health in our daily life. High HRV (high HF or RMSSD measures) has been linked with greater executive function, better dietary decisions, better controlled social media use, and better negativity avoidance, among others (; Sakaki et al., 2016; ; ; ; Williams et al., 2019; ).
3.1.1. Executive function
Heart rate variability measures (LF, HF, LF/HF, RMSSD, SDNN) can be potential early markers of cognitive impairment (). In a study of 79 young healthy participants using a 5-min resting ECG analysis, higher resting HF was associated with higher executive function (Williams et al., 2019). Interestingly, lower resting heart rate was correlated with higher executive function, evaluated by composite score averaged from performance in multiple tasks such as color-word interference, visuospatial, and trail making when controlled for lower-order processes such as processing speed (Williams et al., 2019). Additionally, a study including 53 young male sailors showed that higher resting RMSSD (higher vagal functioning) was associated with better working memory (n-back of digits) and attention (continuous performance test, CPT), including faster and more accurate responses (). Inhibitory control has been measured by startle response (e.g., eye blink from auditory stimulation). In an example, 92 college students (Yang et al., 2021) underwent dual-task paradigm that consists of a working memory task (various cognitive loads) and picture viewing task (pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant images), and their resting HRV was measured. Participants with lower resting HF presented a higher startle response magnitude when concurrent working memory load was high, which can result from insufficient top-down resources when the PFC is heavily taxed by high working memory load (Yang et al., 2021). Furthermore, in a study of 50 young healthy participants, Ottaviani et al. have reported positive associations between resting HRV and inhibitory control. In their study, those with higher resting RMSSD predicted better inhibitory control, also after adjustment for confounders including sex, body mass index, and impulsivity (). A path modeling study from a large sample of civil servants in Brazil (N = 8,114) has suggested that HF reduction (measured with a 10-min resting-state ECG) was associated with impaired executive function (trail-making B) due to insulin resistance and subclinical atherosclerosis ().
3.1.2. Decision making
A study of 51 young male participants examined the relationship between resting HRV and dietary decision-making with options of food between healthy nutrients and tasty temptations. Individuals with high HRV presented better resistance to temptation from comfort foods and presented higher ventromedial PFC activity by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), supporting HRV as a strong dietary self-control biomarker (). In that dietary study, SDNN was used as the HRV proxy, as it is a general variability measure which reflects all influences on RR interval series and is known to correlate with measures that reflect phasic vagal activity during resting state (). An additional decision-making example involves resisting social media network overuse. Among 112 participants ranging between 17 and 53 years old, participants exhibiting high impulsivity and low executive function scores tended to suffer from excessive social media use (Wegmann et al., 2020). Interestingly, high HRV were associated with decreased impulsivity (). Therefore, high HRV could directly and indirectly (through better executive function and lower impulsivity) help resist the temptation to social media overuse.
3.1.3. Emotional regulation
Decision-making is influenced by emotional regulation (). A study involving 63 young (mean age of 19) and 62 older (mean age of 72) participants measured resting HRV and eye-tracking while presented with images of faces showing a range of emotions. While young participants, regardless of HRV level, showed no preference between happy or angry faces, older participants with high HRV were more likely to avoid angry faces, suggesting a greater ability to minimize negative influences and a stronger positivity effect that can benefit emotional regulation and health (). Another study of 21 older and 20 young adults used functional MRI (fMRI) and HRV methods. Their results showed that greater resting HRV (RMSSD) was associated with stronger connectivity between amygdala-medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) across age groups; however, it was associated with stronger connectivity between amygdala-ventrolateral PFC only in the younger group. This study indicates that higher HRV is associated with better emotional regulation across age groups, with some changes in regional associations during aging (Sakaki et al., 2016).
A study including 388 healthy participants of three different age groups suggested that higher RMSSD was linked with higher functional connectivity from bilateral ventromedial PFC in the young adult group and higher functional connectivity from bilateral posterior cingulate cortex across all ages (). This study supports the role of PFC functional plasticity with aging ().
Therefore, high HRV links with better executive function, decision-making ability, and emotional regulation that benefit health and wellbeing. Further, although cognitive function (PFC connectivity) may change with aging, emotional regulation is resilient to aging.
3.2. Pathological conditions: Dementia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), migraine, COVID-19, stroke, epilepsy, and psychological conditions
Studies have linked HRV (ECG analysis) with cognitive dysfunction (including EEG analysis) in dementia, trauma, and COVID-19 (; ; ; ), among others.
3.2.1. Neurological conditions
Dementia is increasingly a source of great personal, societal, and economic burden. The most common type is Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), followed by vascular dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Early detection and differentiation as well as the use of simple biomarkers are critical for early prevention as obvious symptoms are lacking until later in disease progression (). studied 24-h ECG, European Society of Cardiology Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (ESC SCORE), and cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA) in 50 men and women with cardiovascular risk (age ranged 51–77). Their study reported that ultra-low frequency (ULF) HRV was positively associated with MoCA and was negatively associated with ESC SCORE, meaning higher ULF was linked to better cognition and lower ESC SCORE. These findings supported the idea that dysregulation of autonomic nervous system plays an important role in developing cardiovascular risk and cognitive decline (). In a retrospective study of resting HRV on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, compared to the ones who developed AD (MCI-AD, n = 23), those who developed DLB (MCI-DLB: n = 23) presented lower HRV levels (SDNN, RMSSD, LF, HF), as well as lower visuospatial and frontal executive functions tested by comprehensive neuropsychological test commonly used in Korea (; ). An additional HRV study of 311 elderly women showed that cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination less than 24) was greater in participants with lower HRV (HF) (). Therefore, lower HRV were observed with cognitive decline.
Nicolini et al. studied HRV of 253 participants [with amnestic MCI (aMCI), non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), or cognitively normal controls], combined with neuropsychological assessment, as well as visual rating scales for hippocampal atrophy (Scheltens’ scale), insular atrophy (Kim’s scale), and cerebrovascular burden (Fazekas’ scale) on brain imaging (). Traditionally, it is considered that aMCI is associated with AD pathology, while naMCI is associated with other dementia, such as vascular dementia. Among the three groups, aMCI group presented with blunted normalized low frequency (nLF) increase with postural change (from supine resting to standing): more nLF increase in aMCI related to better episodic memory (prose-delayed recall) and less hippocampal/insula atrophy. This result suggested an overlapping autonomic regulation structure that involves memory processing (). On the other hand, naMCI participants presented similar HRV changes to controls: more LF increase related to greater cerebrovascular burden and lower executive function. Their results suggested different autonomic mechanisms between aMCI and naMCI (). Another important finding is that HRV changes depend on task types. For example, a cross-sectional study examined 5-min ECGs from 80 older participants with MCI or healthy cognition during supine rest and standing positions (). Although no differences in baseline HRV indices between groups were observed, during position changes the MCI participants presented with smaller increases of normalized LF (nLF) and smaller decreases of normalized HF (nHF), indicating reduced physiological changes when transitioning from supine resting to standing (). Additionally, used 5-min ECG recordings of 46 cognitively healthy elderly participants classified into two groups (normal or pathological levels of CSF amyloid/tau) at rest or during a computer-based task switching challenge. In this study, there were no differences in baseline HRV between the two groups. However, HRV (RR and LF) decreased from resting to task in those with pathological amyloid/tau, indicating a hyper-active sympathovagal response to a task-switching challenge (). These studies suggested that compared to age-matched controls, individuals with early AD risk presented reduced autonomic changes with physical position changes from supine to standing but presented greater responses to mental tasks.
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or concussion is a functional abnormality with reported autonomic dysfunction. A study of 31 young athletes who experienced concussion or mTBI has suggested that HRV (pNN50) decreased only at the acute stage (3 days after injury) and then recovered at around 3 weeks after injury () compared to 31 undiagnosed young athletes. Higher middle cerebral artery blood velocity at the acute stage was linked with higher HRV (pNN50) and better scores in cognition (Trails making tests) at 3 weeks and 3 month (pNN50) after injury, indicating that insula perfusion (supply by middle cerebral artery) at the acute stage may be one of the underlying predictors for future recovery (Ture et al., 2000; ; ).
Migraine has been shown to involve autonomic dysfunction. A cross-sectional study of 36 participants (18 episodic migraine and 18 controls) has shown that migraine patients during ictal stage presented with lower SDNN and LF than controls. The decreased HRV suggested parasympathetic dysfunction that was negatively related to the visual analog scale for pain intensity, meaning lower HRV linked to greater pain intensity (Zhang et al., 2021). analyzed HRV of 24-h ECG recordings from 27 young patients with migraine (10 with aura and 17 without aura at headache free period) against 10 age-matched healthy controls. They observed consistent autonomic imbalance such as decreased SDNN, RMSSD, and HF in migraine patients (especially those with aura during the night period) supporting parasympathetic hypofunction with sympathetic predominance. Consistent with decreased vagal modulation in migraine, Akter and Ferdousi studied 5-min resting ECG from 60 newly diagnosed migraine patients against 30 age-matched healthy controls. They observed decreased SDNN and RMSSD, as well as higher mean heart rate in the migraine group ().
COVID-19 pandemic has been a recent global health concern. Results from an online questionnaire and cognitive tests completed by 421 participants reported that memory deficit is associated with fatigue or mixed symptoms (). A retrospective study of 271 hospitalized patients has suggested that higher resting HRV (SDNN) predicted more survival of COVID-19 patients aged 70 and older (). Mol et al. suggested that it was only confirmed in this study that when HRV was low, COVID-19 survival was predicted by age, supporting a protective role of vagal activity in COVID-19 (). Additionally, a study of 17 patients analyzed HRV (SDNN) utilizing 5–7 min daily ECG recordings for a week (). Results showed that of the 12 patients who developed a C-reactive protein (CRP) surge of 50% or more, 10 were preceded by over 40% drop of HRV (SDNN) within 72 h, and two other patients were treated with convalescent plasma. Therefore, HRV drop predicted an acute inflammation in COVID-19 (). Another study of 50 participants with a history of COVID-19 infections compared with 50 healthy controls demonstrated decreased HRV in the time domain (such as SDNN and RMSSD) and frequency domain (such as LF and HF), indicating HRV abnormality after COVID-19 (). Although larger sample sizes are needed for confirmation, these studies suggest that HRV may be a helpful tool in monitoring autonomic dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.
Heart rate variability may help to predict stroke. In part of the Copenhagen Holster Study where 48-h ambulatory ECG and HRV were collected from 678 healthy participants between 55 and 75 years of age, lower nighttime SDNN strongly predicted stroke development even after adjustment for stroke risk factors (). Another study investigated baseline HRV from 5,308 patients that suffered an event of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke, followed by functional prognosis and stroke recurrence 90 days after the event. The results suggest that higher SDNN predicts reduced neurological disability and reduced stroke event (). In a study of 884 stroke-free Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) participants, Bodapati et al. examined 24-h ECG-derived HRV and CHS clinical stroke risk score (CHS-SCORE). It was reported that 2 HRV measures, CV% (coefficient of variance of each 5-min NN intervals) and SLOPE (power law slope, or the slope of a line fitted to a plot of log spectral power vs. log of underlying frequency), significantly improved stroke prediction (). Therefore, HRV is helpful with stroke detection and prognosis.
Epilepsy has been studied with HRV for over 30 years. Patients’ interictal HRV suggests an autonomic balance shift toward sympathetic dominance, which also tends toward further sympathetic overactivity (). In a study of 11 epilepsy patients, HRV was compared from 5-min ECG recordings at 10-5 min and 2 h before seizure onset (). Results show that during 5–10 minutes before seizure onset, there were increases of mean HR, LF/HF, and SD2/SD1 (standard deviation of heart rate signals, SD1 shows rapid changes and SD2 describes long-term changes, non-linear analysis in Poincaré plot). Although Poincaré plot analysis is a non-linear method, SD1 and SD2 determined from Poincaré plots are purely linear. These HRV features can potentially be used to define a threshold to aid in predicting seizures (). This was supported by a recent study of 238 temporal lobe seizures from 41 patients where HRV features, including decreased RR and pNN50, helped to identify pre-ictal state in 90% of patients and 41% of seizures (; ).
3.2.2. Psychological conditions
Anxiety disorders have been linked with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. A meta-analysis study of 2,086 patients with anxiety disorder and 2,294 controls free from psychiatric diagnosis suggested that lower HF and time domain measures are associated with anxiety disorders (). These results suggest that decreased vagal activity may underlie increased cardiovascular risk in anxiety disorders. Stress conditions were reviewed in a meta-analysis of HRV and stress from 37 publications. This overview suggested consistent low vagal activity (decreased HF and increased LF) related to stress (). Schizophrenia as another critical neurological disorder affecting especially younger people, is of great epidemiological importance especially for the healthcare system of developed civilizations (; Schulz et al., 2020). Schulz et al. (2020) studied cardiorespiratory network coupling for 30 min during rest (NN interval, heart rate, and respiratory frequency) from 23 patients with schizophrenia, 20 first-degree relatives, and 23 healthy controls, using coupling analyses including normalized short-time partial directed coherence, multivariate transfer entropy, and cross conditional entropy. Results suggest compared to controls, schizophrenia patients’ respiration had weaker influences on heart rate, while their heart rate had stronger influences on respiration; their first-degree relatives presented stronger heart rate influences. Results revealed a genetic component of the cardiorespiratory coupling (Schulz et al., 2020). The same group also studied central-autonomic-network (CAN) between central (frontal EEG power), vascular (systolic pressure amplitude), respiratory (frequency), and cardiac (heart rate) activities from 17 schizophrenia patients and 17 controls. Results suggest that schizophrenia patients presented stronger linear respiratory and cardiac influences on central activity, and stronger linear central influences on vascular activity compared to controls (Schulz et al., 2019). Therefore, HRV could be a potential objective measure of psychological distress, including anxiety, stress, and schizophrenia.
Therefore, HRV has been studied in various neurological conditions. HRV analysis may help predict symptoms or outcomes of cognitive decline, migraine, epilepsy, and stroke, and to help identify psychopathologies such as anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia. These changes link pathologies and symptoms such that HRV potentially allows diagnostic and therapeutic supplements in existing pre-clinical and clinical research.
To summarize, high HRV and its associated vagal functioning reflect better executive function, emotional regulation, and decision making in healthy individuals. During pathological condition, HRV was associated with autonomic dysfunction observed in neurological diseases (Figure 3). Efforts are needed to improve our understanding of the heart-brain interactions.
FIGURE 3
4. Updates and limitation
There are some limitations and updates to this topic: (1) We only reviewed literatures using linear analysis of HRV and non-linear HRV analysis were not included. (2) Studies have focused on classical HRV analysis that represent autonomic regulation. However, recent studies have demonstrated that a more disorganized sinus rhythm (erratic rhythm) can contribute to HRV increase in older adults, besides autonomic regulation (Stein et al., 2008; Wdowczyk et al., 2018). The mechanisms underlying the heart rate fragmentation are limited. Details are beyond the scope of this review. Candidate contributors may include cellular, intracellular, extracellular mechanisms, and potential sinus cell uncoupling (). Therefore, heart rate fragmentation adds to the complexity of what HRV can be interpreted as neuro-autonomic regulation and is also consistent with a limited view of what HRV can tell us. Further studies will be needed to address that. (3) We have reviewed studies that include both short term measures of HRV in the laboratory settings (most studies) and HRV over a prolonged period of time in real life ambulatory settings. With more focused electrophysiological processing, lab settings provide high quality signals and controlled environment, as well as individual’s responses to stimuli (; ). HRV studies in real life settings have received attention recently with advantages of real-life processing of stimuli. Their challenges include lower signal quality from physical activity and uncontrollable momentary conditions. Several approaches have been used to overcome those challenges for large scale HRV studies, such as additional algorithm for noise reduction, artificial intelligence, and use appropriate reference state (Smets et al., 2019). For example, carefully designed experiments are needed with data collected at different times or conditions for the same individuals that allow self-controlled data (Smets et al., 2019). Further, commercial technologies provide wearable sensors for real life HRV studies, which have supported their application for objective measures of stress or relaxed state and orthostatic challenge (; ). Interestingly, HRV study during a simulated virtual environment has been shown to detect stress-vulnerable individuals (Rodrigues et al., 2020). (4) HRV measured under real life or free-running conditions needs to be carefully interpreted. The information at the time of measurement is often insufficient, and it is difficult to tell whether the HRV analyses reflect characteristics of autonomic function or indirectly reflect characteristics of behavior or psychophysical activity. For example, a lower LF/HF during free activity is associated with worse life expectancy (Shimizu et al., 2002). However, when people spend more time in the supine position during the day, they may have a lower mean LF/HF, but it is not associated with lower sympathetic activity (lower stress or better cardiac function).
5. Conclusion
The heart and brain have bi-directional influences on each other, and both are involved in an individual’s proper reactions to internal and environmental signals. The reciprocal support and regulation help wellbeing while dysregulations (e.g., decreased vagal functioning or increased HRF) can be associated with cognitive dysfunction or other neurological conditions.
Statements
Author contributions
XA, MK, and RK: conception and design of the review. XA, RA, EC, JB, BB, CM, and D-AW: acquisition of the materials. XA and RA: writing the manuscript. XA, RA, EC, JB, BB, CM, D-AW, SS, YJ, MK, and RK: editing the manuscript. All authors contributed toward discussions of the review and the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute of Aging (grant number: R01AG063857).
Acknowledgments
We thank the Dr. Sandya Narayanswami edited the manuscript and Roger Rochart helped with journal discussion.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AhmedM. W.KadishA. H.ParkerM. A.GoldbergerJ. J. (1994). Effect of physiologic and pharmacologic adrenergic stimulation on heart rate variability.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.241082–1090.
2
AkterT.FerdousiS. (2017). Autonomic dysfunction and migraine: assessed by time series analysis of heart rate variability.J. Bangladesh. Soc. Physiol.1257–60.
3
AlbottC. S.WozniakJ. R.McglinchB. P.WallM. H.GoldB. S.VinogradovS. (2020). Battle buddies: rapid deployment of a psychological resilience intervention for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Anesth. Analg.13143–54. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004912
4
AllanL. M.BallardC. G.AllenJ.MurrayA.DavidsonA. W.MckeithI. G.et al (2007). Autonomic dysfunction in dementia.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry78671–677.
5
AllenJ. J.ChambersA. S.TowersD. N. (2007). The many metrics of cardiac chronotropy: a pragmatic primer and a brief comparison of metrics.Biol. Psychol.74243–262. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.08.005
6
Almeida-SantosM. A.Barreto-FilhoJ. A.OliveiraJ. L.ReisF. P.Da Cunha OliveiraC. C.SousaA. C. (2016). Aging, heart rate variability and patterns of autonomic regulation of the heart.Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr.631–8.
7
AngiusL.SantarnecchiE.Pascual-LeoneA.MarcoraS. M. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves inhibitory control and endurance performance in healthy individuals.Neuroscience41934–45. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.052
8
ArechavalaR. J.RochartR.KlonerR. A.LiuA.WuD. A.HungS. M.et al (2021). Task switching reveals abnormal brain-heart electrophysiological signatures in cognitively healthy individuals with abnormal CSF amyloid/tau, a pilot study.Int. J. Psychophysiol.170102–111. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.10.007
9
BalconiM.FrondaG.IreneV.CrivelliD. (2017). Conscious, pre-conscious and unconscious mechanisms in emotional behavioral. Some applications to the mindfulness approach with wearable devices.Appl. Sci.7:1280.
10
BilleciL.MarinoD.InsanaL.VattiG.VaraniniM. (2018). Patient-specific seizure prediction based on heart rate variability and recurrence quantification analysis.PLoS One13:e0204339. 10.1371/journal.pone.0204339
11
BillmanG. E. (2013). The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance.Front. Physiol.4:26. 10.3389/fphys.2013.00026
12
BiniciZ.MouridsenM. R.KoberL.SajadiehA. (2011). Decreased nighttime heart rate variability is associated with increased stroke risk.Stroke423196–3201.
13
BodapatiR. K.KizerJ. R.KopW. J.KamelH.SteinP. K. (2017). Addition of 24-hour heart rate variability parameters to the cardiovascular health study stroke risk score and prediction of incident stroke: the cardiovascular health study.J. Am. Heart Assoc.6:e004305. 10.1161/JAHA.116.004305
14
ChallapalliS.KadishA. H.HorvathG.GoldbergerJ. J. (1999). Differential effects of parasympathetic blockade and parasympathetic withdrawal on heart rate variability.J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.101192–1199. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00295.x
15
ChalmersJ. A.QuintanaD. S.AbbottM. J.KempA. H. (2014). Anxiety disorders are associated with reduced heart rate variability: a meta-analysis.Front. Psychiatry5:80. 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00080
16
CostaM. D.DavisR. B.GoldbergerA. L. (2017). Heart rate fragmentation: a new approach to the analysis of cardiac interbeat interval dynamics.Front. Physiol.8:255. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00255
17
CostaM. D.RedlineS.DavisR. B.HeckbertS. R.SolimanE. Z.GoldbergerA. L. (2018). Heart rate fragmentation as a novel biomarker of adverse cardiovascular events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.Front. Physiol.9:1117. 10.3389/fphys.2018.01117
18
CostaM. D.RedlineS.HughesT. M.HeckbertS. R.GoldbergerA. L. (2021). Prediction of cognitive decline using heart rate fragmentation analysis: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.Front. Aging Neurosci.13:708130. 10.3389/fnagi.2021.708130
19
DziembowskaI.IzdebskiP.RasmusA.BrudnyJ.GrzelczakM.CysewskiP. (2016). Effects of heart rate variability biofeedback on EEG alpha asymmetry and anxiety symptoms in male athletes: a pilot study.Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback41141–150. 10.1007/s10484-015-9319-4
20
ForteG.FavieriF.CasagrandeM. (2019). Heart rate variability and cognitive function: a systematic review.Front. Neurosci.13:710. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00710
21
FrancescoB.Maria GraziaB.EmanueleG.ValentinaF.SaraC.ChiaraF.et al (2012). Linear and nonlinear heart rate variability indexes in clinical practice.Comput. Math. Methods Med.2012:219080.
22
FungB. J.CroneD. L.BodeS.MurawskiC. (2017). Cardiac signals are independently associated with temporal discounting and time perception.Front. Behav. Neurosci.11:1. 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00001
23
GambassiB. B.NevesV. R.BritoE. Z. A.Da Silva FernandesD. S.SaC. A.Da Rochaet al (2020). A validation study of a smartphone application for heart rate variability assessment in asymptomatic adults.Am. J. Cardiovasc. Dis.10219–229.
24
GasiorJ. S.SachaJ.JelenP. J.ZielinskiJ.PrzybylskiJ. (2016). Heart rate and respiratory rate influence on heart rate variability repeatability: effects of the correction for the prevailing heart rate.Front. Physiol.7:356. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00356
25
GreenwoodP. M. (2007). Functional plasticity in cognitive aging: review and hypothesis.Neuropsychology21657–673.
26
GuoP.BallesterosA. B.YeungS. P.LiuR.SahaA.CurtisL.et al (2022). COVCOG 2: cognitive and memory deficits in long COVID: a second publication from the COVID and cognition study.Front. Aging Neurosci.14:804937. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.804937
27
HansenA. L.JohnsenB. H.ThayerJ. F. (2003). Vagal influence on working memory and attention.Int. J. Psychophysiol.48263–274.
28
HasanA. A.CallaghanP.LymnJ. S. (2014). Evaluation of the impact of a psycho-educational intervention on knowledge levels and psychological outcomes for people diagnosed with Schizophrenia and their caregivers in Jordan: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Psychiatry14:17. 10.1186/1471-244X-14-17
29
HastyF.GarciaG.DavilaC. H.WittelsS. H.HendricksS.ChongS. (2020). Heart rate variability as a possible predictive marker for acute inflammatory response in COVID-19 patients.Mil. Med.186e34–e38. 10.1093/milmed/usaa405
30
HavakukO.KingK. S.GrazetteL.YoonA. J.FongM.BregmanN.et al (2017). Heart failure-induced brain injury.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.691609–1616.
31
HayanoJ.KisoharaM.UedaN.YudaE. (2020). Impact of heart rate fragmentation on the assessment of heart rate variability.Appl. Sci.10:3314.
32
HayanoJ.YudaE. (2019). Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability.J. Physiol. Anthropol.38:3.
33
HernandoD.RocaS.SanchoJ.AlesancoA.BailonR. (2018). Validation of the apple watch for heart rate variability measurements during relax and mental stress in healthy subjects.Sensors18:2619. 10.3390/s18082619
34
ImahoriY.VetranoD. L.XiaX.GrandeG.LjungmanP.FratiglioniL.et al (2021). Association of resting heart rate with cognitive decline and dementia in older adults: a population-based cohort study.Alzheimers Dement.181779–1787. 10.1002/alz.12495
35
ImbimboC.SpallazziM.Ferrari-PellegriniF.VillaA.ZilioliA.MuttiC.et al (2022). Heart rate variability and cognitive performance in adults with cardiovascular risk.Cereb. Circ. Cogn. Behav.3:100136.
36
JordanB. D. (2013). The clinical spectrum of sport-related traumatic brain injury.Nat. Rev. Neurol.9222–230.
37
KempA. H.LopezS. R.PassosV. M. A.BittencourtM. S.DantasE. M.MillJ. G.et al (2016). Insulin resistance and carotid intima-media thickness mediate the association between resting-state heart rate variability and executive function: a path modelling study.Biol. Psychol.117216–224. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.04.006
38
KimD. H.LipsitzL. A.FerrucciL.VaradhanR.GuralnikJ. M.CarlsonM. C.et al (2006). Association between reduced heart rate variability and cognitive impairment in older disabled women in the community: women’s Health and Aging Study I.J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.541751–1757. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00940.x
39
KimH. G.CheonE. J.BaiD. S.LeeY. H.KooB. H. (2018). Stress and heart rate variability: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.Psychiatry Investig.15235–245.
40
KimM. S.YoonJ. H.HongJ. M. (2018). Early differentiation of dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease: heart rate variability at mild cognitive impairment stage.Clin. Neurophysiol.1291570–1578. 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.004
41
KlonerR. A. (2019). Lessons learned about stress and the heart after major earthquakes.Am. Heart J.21520–26. 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.05.017
42
KlonerR. A.LeorJ.PooleW. K.PerrittR. (1997). Population-based analysis of the effect of the Northridge Earthquake on cardiac death in Los Angeles County, California.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.301174–1180. 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00281-7
43
KlonerR. A.McdonaldS.LeekaJ.PooleW. K. (2009). Comparison of total and cardiovascular death rates in the same city during a losing versus winning super bowl championship.Am. J. Cardiol.1031647–1650. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.012
44
KoenigJ.ThayerJ. F. (2016). Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: a meta-analysis.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.64288–310.
45
KumralD.SchaareH. L.BeyerF.ReineltJ.UhligM.LiemF.et al (2019). The age-dependent relationship between resting heart rate variability and functional brain connectivity.Neuroimage185521–533. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.027
46
KurtogluE.AfsinA.AktasI.AkturkE.KutlusoyE.CagasarO. (2022). Altered cardiac autonomic function after recovery from COVID-19.Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol.27:e12916. 10.1111/anec.12916
47
La FountaineM. F.HohnA. N.LeahyC. L.TestaA. J.WeirJ. P. (2022). Use of Mayer wave activity to demonstrate aberrant cardiovascular autonomic control following sports concussion injury.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1507121–132. 10.1111/nyas.14683
48
LealA.PintoM. F.LopesF.BianchiA. M.HenriquesJ.RuanoM. G.et al (2021). Heart rate variability analysis for the identification of the preictal interval in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.Sci. Rep.11:5987. 10.1038/s41598-021-85350-y
49
LensenI. S.MonfrediO. J.AndrisR. T.LakeD. E.MoormanJ. R. (2020). Heart rate fragmentation gives novel insights into non-autonomic mechanisms governing beat-to-beat control of the heart’s rhythm.JRSM Cardiovasc. Dis.9:2048004020948732. 10.1177/2048004020948732
50
LevyM. N. (1990). Autonomic interactions in cardiac control.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.601209–221.
51
LevyM. N.YangT.WallickD. W. (1993). Assessment of beat-by-beat control of heart rate by the autonomic nervous system: molecular biology technique are necessary, but not sufficient.J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.4183–193. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1993.tb01222.x
52
LiC.MengX.PanY.LiZ.WangM.WangY. (2021). The association between heart rate variability and 90-day prognosis in patients with transient ischemic attack and minor stroke.Front. Neurol.12:636474. 10.3389/fneur.2021.636474
53
MadhavanM.Graff-RadfordJ.PicciniJ. P.GershB. J. (2018). Cognitive dysfunction in atrial fibrillation.Nat. Rev. Cardiol.15744–756.
54
MaierS. U.HareT. A. (2017). Higher heart-rate variability is associated with ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity and increased resistance to temptation in dietary self-control challenges.J. Neurosci.37446–455. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2815-16.2016
55
MakowiecD.WejerD.KaczkowskaA.Zarczynska-BuchowieckaM.StruzikZ. R. (2015). Chronographic imprint of age-induced alterations in heart rate dynamical organization.Front. Physiol.6:201. 10.3389/fphys.2015.00201
56
MantantzisK.SchlagheckenF.MaylorE. A. (2020). Heart rate variability predicts older adults’ avoidance of negativity.J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.751679–1688.
57
MartinL. N.DelgadoM. R. (2011). The influence of emotion regulation on decision-making under risk.J. Cogn. Neurosci.232569–2581.
58
MateiD.ConstantinescuV.CorciovaC.IgnatB.MateiR.PopescuC. D. (2015). Autonomic impairment in patients with migraine.Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.193922–3927.
59
McCratyR.ChildreD. (2010). Coherence: bridging personal, social, and global health.Altern. Ther. Health Med.1610–24.
60
McCratyR.ShafferF. (2015). Heart rate variability: new perspectives on physiological mechanisms, assessment of self-regulatory capacity, and health risk.Glob. Adv. Health Med.446–61. 10.7453/gahmj.2014.073
61
MolM. B. A.StrousM. T. A.Van OschF. H. M.VogelaarF. J.BartenD. G.FarchiM.et al (2021). Heart-rate-variability (HRV), predicts outcomes in COVID-19.PLoS One16:e0258841. 10.1371/journal.pone.0258841
62
MooreE. E.JeffersonA. L. (2021). Impact of cardiovascular hemodynamics on cognitive aging.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.411255–1264.
63
MoridaniM. K.FarhadiH. (2017). Heart rate variability as a biomarker for epilepsy seizure prediction.Bratisl Lek Listy1183–8.
64
MyersK. A.SivathambooS.PeruccaP. (2018). Heart rate variability measurement in epilepsy: How can we move from research to clinical practice?Epilepsia592169–2178. 10.1111/epi.14587
65
NelsonP. T.JichaG. A.KryscioR. J.AbnerE. L.SchmittF. A.CooperG.et al (2010). Low sensitivity in clinical diagnoses of dementia with Lewy bodies.J. Neurol.257359–366.
66
NicoliniP.CiullaM. M.De AsmundisC.MagriniF.BrugadaP. (2012). The prognostic value of heart rate variability in the elderly, changing the perspective: from sympathovagal balance to chaos theory.Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.35622–638. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03335.x
67
NicoliniP.CiullaM. M.MalfattoG.AbbateC.MariD.RossiP. D.et al (2014). Autonomic dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment: evidence from power spectral analysis of heart rate variability in a cross-sectional case-control study.PLoS One9:e96656. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096656
68
NicoliniP.MariD.AbbateC.IngleseS.BertagnoliL.TomasiniE.et al (2020). Autonomic function in amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment: spectral heart rate variability analysis provides evidence for a brain-heart axis.Sci. Rep.10:11661. 10.1038/s41598-020-68131-x
69
OttavianiC.ZingarettiP.PettaA. M.AntonucciG.ThayerJ. F.FernandaS. G. (2019). Resting heart rate variability predicts inhibitory control above and beyond impulsivity.J. Psychophysiol.33:198.
70
PrinslooG. E.RauchH. G.KarpulD.DermanW. E. (2013). The effect of a single session of short duration heart rate variability biofeedback on EEG: a pilot study.Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback3845–56. 10.1007/s10484-012-9207-0
71
PurkayasthaS.WilliamsB.MurphyM.LyngS.SaboT.BellK. R. (2019). Reduced heart rate variability and lower cerebral blood flow associated with poor cognition during recovery following concussion.Auton Neurosci.220:102548. 10.1016/j.autneu.2019.04.004
72
RodriguesJ.StuderE.StreuberS.MeyerN.SandiC. (2020). Locomotion in virtual environments predicts cardiovascular responsiveness to subsequent stressful challenges.Nat Commun115904. 10.1038/s41467-020-19736-3
73
RollmanJ. E.KlonerR. A.BossonN.NiemannJ. T.Gausche-HillM.WilliamsM.et al (2021). Emergency Medical Services Responses to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Suspected ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Los Angeles County.J Am Heart Assoc10e019635. 10.1161/JAHA.120.019635
74
RosenbluethA.SimeoneF. A. (1934). The interrelations of vagal and accelerator effects on the cardiac rate.Am J Physiol1108.
75
RussoM. A.SantarelliD. M.O’rourkeD. (2017). The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human.Breathe13298–309.
76
SakakiM.YooH. J.NgaL.LeeT. H.ThayerJ. F.MatherM. (2016). Heart rate variability is associated with amygdala functional connectivity with MPFC across younger and older adults.Neuroimage13944–52. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.076
77
SalomonR.NoelJ. P.LukowskaM.FaivreN.MetzingerT.SerinoA.et al (2017). Unconscious integration of multisensory bodily inputs in the peripersonal space shapes bodily self-consciousness.Cognition166174–183. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.028
78
SchulzS.HaueisenJ.BarK. J.VossA. (2019). Altered causal coupling pathways within the central-autonomic-network in patients suffering from schizophrenia.Entropy21:733. 10.3390/e21080733
79
SchulzS.HaueisenJ.BarK. J.VossA. (2020). The cardiorespiratory network in healthy first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients.Front. Neurosci.14:617. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00617
80
ShafferF.GinsbergJ. P. (2017). An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms.Front. Public Health5:258. 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258
81
ShafferF.MccratyR.ZerrC. L. (2014). A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability.Front. Psychol.5:1040. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040
82
ShimizuK.AraiY.HiroseN.YonemotoT.WakidaY. (2002). Prognostic significance of heart rate variability in centenarians.Clin. Exp. Hypertens.2491–97. 10.1081/ceh-100108719
83
SmetsE.De RaedtW.Van HoofC. (2019). Into the wild: the challenges of physiological stress detection in laboratory and ambulatory settings.IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.23463–473. 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2883751
84
SongR.PanK. Y.XuH.QiX.BuchmanA. S.BennettD. A.et al (2021). Association of cardiovascular risk burden with risk of dementia and brain pathologies: a population-based cohort study.Alzheimers Dement.171914–1922.
85
SteinP. K.LeQ.DomitrovichP. P.InvestigatorsC. (2008). Development of more erratic heart rate patterns is associated with mortality post-myocardial infarction.J. Electrocardiol.41110–115. 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.11.005
86
TureU.YasargilM. G.Al-MeftyO.YasargilD. C. (2000). Arteries of the insula.J Neurosurg92676–687.
87
von RosenbergW.ChanwimalueangT.AdjeiT.JafferU.GoverdovskyV.MandicD. P. (2017). Resolving ambiguities in the LF/HF Ratio: LF-HF scatter plots for the categorization of mental and physical stress from HRV.Front. Physiol.8:360. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00360
88
VossA.SchroederR.HeitmannA.PetersA.PerzS. (2015). Short-term heart rate variability–influence of gender and age in healthy subjects.PLoS One10:e0118308. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118308
89
WdowczykJ.MakowiecD.GruchalaM.WejerD.StruzikZ. R. (2018). Dynamical landscape of heart rhythm in long-term heart transplant recipients: a way to discern erratic rhythms.Front. Physiol.9:274. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00274
90
WegmannE.MullerS. M.TurelO.BrandM. (2020). Interactions of impulsivity, general executive functions, and specific inhibitory control explain symptoms of social-networks-use disorder: an experimental study.Sci. Rep.10:3866. 10.1038/s41598-020-60819-4
91
WilliamsP. G.CribbetM. R.TinajeroR.RauH. K.ThayerJ. F.SuchyY. (2019). The association between individual differences in executive functioning and resting high-frequency heart rate variability.Biol. Psychol.148:107772. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107772
92
YangX.SpanglerD. P.ThayerJ. F.FriedmanB. H. (2021). Resting heart rate variability modulates the effects of concurrent working memory load on affective startle modification.Psychophysiology58:e13833. 10.1111/psyp.13833
93
ZengW.MarshallK.MinS.DaouI.ChapleauM.AbboudF.et al (2018). PIEZOs mediate neuronal sensing of blood pressure and the baroreceptor reflex.Science362464–467. 10.1126/science.aau6324
94
ZhangL.QiuS.ZhaoC.WangP.YuS. (2021). Heart rate variability analysis in episodic migraine: a cross-sectional study.Front. Neurol.12:647092. 10.3389/fneur.2021.647092
Summary
Keywords
heart rate variability, cognition, inhibitory control, neurological conditions, heart and brain, erratic sinus rhythm, heart rate fragmentation, vagal functioning
Citation
Arakaki X, Arechavala RJ, Choy EH, Bautista J, Bliss B, Molloy C, Wu D-A, Shimojo S, Jiang Y, Kleinman MT and Kloner RA (2023) The connection between heart rate variability (HRV), neurological health, and cognition: A literature review. Front. Neurosci. 17:1055445. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1055445
Received
27 September 2022
Accepted
06 February 2023
Published
01 March 2023
Volume
17 - 2023
Edited by
Joel C. Bornstein, The University of Melbourne, Australia
Reviewed by
Junichiro Hayano, Heartbeat Science Lab Co., Ltd., Japan; Andreas Voss, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Arakaki, Arechavala, Choy, Bautista, Bliss, Molloy, Wu, Shimojo, Jiang, Kleinman and Kloner.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xianghong Arakaki, xianghong.arakaki@hmri.org
This article was submitted to Autonomic Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.