Introduction
In 2020 Global Poverty Monitoring saw the largest one-year increase since its beginning, with an increase of 11% of people living below extreme poverty (from 648 million to 719 million). The economic impact brought by COVID-19, apace with ongoing wars and conflicts, has created a bigger setback toward progress. Low income countries (LIC) and lower middle income countries (LMIC) suffered the highest increases in extreme poverty due to restrictions, as many households, already impoverished before the pandemic, lost their income (Josephson et al., ; World Bank, ). World hunger increased in 2021, affecting at least 702 million people, and a worrisome issue is inflation in consumer food prices, partly due to various degrees of food supply chain disruption and economic crisis, making it a challenge to afford a healthy diet (FAO et al., ).
Worldwide, one billion children under the age of 5 years are affected by parasitic intestinal infection due to living in poverty and developing malnutrition and diarrhea, which is still a public health concern in LIC and LMIC groups (Nantege et al., ; Tareke et al., ). This is primarily due to inadequate housing, unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation, severe and repeated infections, poor diet, and limited access to healthcare (Pinkerton et al., ; Ghosh et al., ). Environmental enteropathy and enteric infections owing to recurrent conditions of poor sanitation, culminating with malnutrition, lead to persistent gut barrier disruption and inflammation abrogating the individualās capacity to adequately absorb nutrients and oral vaccines with impaired gut immune responses (Guerrant et al., ; Gilmartin and Petri, ; Tshala-Katumbay et al., ).
Epigenetic mechanisms may retain the developmental plastic responses to the environment and orchestrate the evolving phenotype and their stability throughout life (Wang et al., ). Certain genetic traits may favor better adaptations for thriving in adverse environments and display a trade-off cost during lifespan with long-lasting implications in growth development, cognition, and educational performance and increased risk for neurodegeneration and metabolic diseases later in life (Guerrant et al., ; Tshala-Katumbay et al., ).
Evidence suggests a protective role for the apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) allele against heavy burdens of diarrhea in weaning-age children living in adverse environments and poverty in developing countries (Wright et al., ; Mitter et al., ). Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a carrier protein that delivers cholesterol to be metabolized for lipid homeostasis and is produced in several tissues and cells, such as the liver, skin, macrophages, and brain (Mahley and Rall, ). ApoE binds to cholesterol in the brain and incorporates into membrane structures and myelin, playing an important role in brain development (Gƶritz et al., ). The human apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) is polymorphic and harbors three common alleles: APOE2, APOE3, and APOE4, coding distinct isoforms with changes in amino acids at position 112 and 158, which influences the protein's function and stability (Giau et al., ).
In this opinion paper, we summarized the updated literature on the pros and cons of harboring APOE4, in the context of adverse environments. In addition, we highlight the possible effects of long-COVID-19 and APOE4 as potential risk factors for acquiring neurodegenerative diseases and call attention to the importance of early and precise interventions to avert health complications and hospital costs in public health.
APOE4 and cognitive decline under adverse environments
A model proposed by Dahlgren and Whitehead categorizes health determinants into layers, with general socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental conditions being the outer layer, followed by living and working conditions that also consider water and sanitation, housing, and health care services, the next layer is social and community networks, then lifestyle and the last layer being biological factors (Dahlgren Gand, ). It is now well-established that all layers are interconnected and interact with one another to influence an individual's wellbeing (Lawrance et al., ).
Although APOE4 has not been associated with cognitive development in pediatric populations in resource-rich countries (Turic et al., ), APOE4-positive children living in adverse environments and afflicted by heavy diarrhea burdens early in life displayed better cognitive outcomes than non-carriers in neuropsychological assessments (OriĆ” et al., ). Additionally, a study with Amazonian forager-horticulturalists revealed that adult APOE4 carriers in a highly helminthic-endemic environment showed better cognitive performance when compared to non-carriers. In this population, 85.9% of adults had eosinophilia, used as a proxy of helminth infections, and APOE4 status was associated with lower eosinophil and leukocyte counts, suggesting more endurance to infections. In the absence of eosinophilia, however, there was a trend toward cognitive decline (Trumble et al., ).
Furthermore, undernourished APOE4 targeted replacement (TR) mice infected with Cryptosporidium parvum, a protozoon commonly associated with diarrhea in children living in endemic areas of malnutrition, showed a more regulated inflammatory response and more efficient pathogen elimination with higher levels of Toll-Like receptor 9 (TLR9) transcripts which are mediators of the innate immune system against Cryptosporidiosis (Azevedo et al., ). C. parvum-infected and undernourished APOE4 TR mice displayed higher levels of L-arginine selective cationic protein transporter (CAT-1) in the ileum, and this may promote a better intestinal barrier function, mucosal blood flow and repair (Li et al., ; Azevedo et al., ). Altogether, these findings suggest that APOE4 has provided a survival advantage, by improving the gut-brain axis in conditions of environmental enteropathy.
Interestingly, significant differences have been found in metabolite expression and fecal microbial profile between young and old APOE4 TR mice, where young mice have a higher phylogenetic diversity and older mice have significantly fewer butyrate-producing bacteria and short-chain fatty acids, which may interfere with metabolism and possibly affect cognitive decline (Tran et al., ). This may reflect the antagonistic pleiotropy observed in APOE4 and explain in part its protective role in young carriers and its risk factor role for neurodegeneration in older carriers. Antagonistic pleiotropy is a condition when a gene or genetic trait is beneficial for early development and detrimental to aging.
Nonetheless, a study evaluating healthy 12 years old adolescents revealed that although gender was a critical factor when assessing the effects of pollution on metabolic and central nervous systems, APOE4 carriers showed higher body mass index (BMI) and glucose levels and decreased cognitive performance (Calderón-Garcidueñas et al., ). Although this study focused on healthy children, APOE4 alone could impact metabolic and cognitive performance. Furthermore, in adults, this finding harbors a unique public health issue for LIC and LMIC groups, which has been raised before (WHO, ).
Cognitively unaffected APOE4 carriers between the ages of 20 and 38, from a resource-rich environment, already showed altered functional brain activity during episodic memory encoding and retrieval assessments (Matura et al., ). Studies of the early impact of apoE4 on brain activity and functional plasticity in rats have shown that there are structural, molecular, and functional modifications in the different hippocampal regions promoting neuronal constriction and interrupting learning processes, and this may prompt later apoE4-related pathologies (Har-Paz et al., ).
This is a glimpse at the early effects of APOE4, where it no longer harbors strong protection against cognitive development. As individuals age, with environmental exposure and lifestyle behaviors, apoE4 could discretely compound adverse effects that later trigger neurodegeneration. If that same individual is exposed to other diseases, such as COVID-19, with cognitive implications later in life, it may lead to the onset or aggravate neurodegeneration. The antagonistic pleiotropy of APOE4 is a matter of debate and it is unclear whether an APOE4 carrier living in an adverse environment and poverty, possibly having encountered prolonged malnutrition, will be at a greater risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.
APOE4, COVID-19, and neurodegenerative diseases
The brain is the second most prominent site of apoE synthesis in humans, produced mainly by astrocytes and microglia (Boyles et al., ). This association is significant, as the APOE4 allele confers a higher risk of sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Liu et al., ). A single E4 allele increases the risk of AD by 2ā3 times, and homozygosity for this allele increases the risk by 5ā15 times (Farrer et al., ). Likewise, individuals with the E2 allele have a 43% reduction in the risk of AD, suggesting a protective role for this allele (Ewbank, ).
The mechanism by which this risk arises may involve a greater production of β-amyloid protein (Aβ), this deposit being more severe in the presence of the E4 isoform, as demonstrated in studies with transgenic mice for the gene, in addition to the absence of apoE reducing the β-amyloid deposit (Bales et al., ; Huang et al., ). ApoE4 is associated with cerebral amyloidogenesis by increasing amyloid beta production to a greater extent than other isoforms and increasing tau hyperphosphorylation under stress (Liu et al., ; Huang et al., ). Furthermore, APOE single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs429358 and rs7412 are linked with ischemic cerebral infarction contributing to cerebrovascular diseases in the pathophysiology of many cases of dementia (Pendlebury and Rothwell, ; Wu et al., ).
A study in the United Kingdom revealed that APOE4 status was correlated with severe COVID-19 outcomes. APOE gene is highly expressed in the alveolar cells of the lungs, together with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) (Kuo et al., ). The APOE2 allele was found to have a protective role against more severe clinical conditions of COVID-19 in 249 volunteers with a mean age of 49 years (Espinosa-Salinas et al., ). The apoE4 isoform facilitates the cell viral entry compared to the apoE3, probably due to the more compact structure of the apoE4 and minor spatial interference, thus augmenting the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with ACE receptor (Zhang et al., ). In vitro model studies have highlighted that SARS-CoV-2 infection preferentially activates astrocytes reducing the length of their cytoplasmatic extensions and increasing cytopathogenic effects (Wang et al., ).
COVID-19 cognitive impairment has been evaluated by different studies, occurring both in the acute phase and in the post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 syndrome or the so-called long COVID phase (Alemanno et al., ; Baig, ; Nalbandian et al., ; Tavares-JĆŗnior et al., ). 45% of COVID-19 survivors experience at least one long-term unresolved symptom, 4 months after disease onset (O'Mahoney et al., ). In addition to COVID-19, other factors may contribute to cognitive complaints in the acute phase of the disease, such as hospitalization, hypoxemia, and delirium (Sartori et al., ; Honarmand et al., ). To the best of our knowledge, only one publication from our group evaluated cognitive manifestations after COVID-19 and correlated them with polymorphisms of the APOE gene (Tavares-JĆŗnior et al., ). In a new article (under review) with more patients, we found a higher frequency of the E4 allele in long COVID patients with cognitive decline.
Notably, it has been recognized that Alzheimer's disease patients harboring APOE4 are more at risk for high infectivity and worse COVID-19 outcomes (Goyal et al., ). In mice, SARS-CoV-2 can cross the blood-brain barrier through adsorptive transcytosis and this is strongly dependent on glycoproteins' sugars of the virus and targeted cell. In a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, infection with a non-replicating SARS, as well as S1 (ectodomain of the spike protein), increased neuroinflammation. Accumulated beta-amyloid peptide facilitated the S protein binding to ACE2 and viral internalization (Erickson et al., ). Although autopsy studies suggest that very small loads of SARS-CoV-2 RNA are found in the postmortem brain, the primary cause of cognitive impairment (or neurological complications from COVID-19) may arise from hypoxia and systemic inflammation (Thakur et al., ), which themselves may lead to neurodegeneration.
Final considerations
In 2019 non-communicable diseases were responsible for 74% of deaths globally. Diseases such as stroke, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and liver cirrhosis are taking over the leading causes of death in LIC and LMIC, and the trend indicates that non-communicable diseases will rise further (WHO, ), affecting the risk and early onset of neurodegenerative diseases.
Recent breakthrough advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence may be instrumental in screening big databases in LIC and LMIC populations and building predicted disease risk analytics and better interventional roadmaps regarding the influence of APOE4 on neurodegenerative diseases in long COVID-19 patients. Asymptomatic testing programs are important in predicting the rise and progression of new diseases that may eventually synergize with other diseases, leading to increased morbidity and/or mortality. There is a need for more precision medicine centers accessible to a population living in poverty and exposed to adverse environments, as they rely on the public health system alone for care.
There is still a gap of knowledge in addressing whether APOE4 compounded with COVID-19 (even asymptomatic) would impact brain development in children and adults living in adverse environments and poverty. Caution should be taken as neurodegenerative diseases are complex and multifactorial borne conditions, however, under certain aggravating circumstances, APOE4 and COVID-19 may be strong drivers toward neurodegeneration.
In summary, we call for awareness of the potential public health issue of long COVID-19 as a cumulative risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases in APOE4 carriers chronically exposed to adverse environments and limited access to healthcare. Embedding genomics into routine public health practice in LIC and LMIC groups will provide accurate information regarding the stratification of molecular markers and assist in early intervention.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) Chamada CNPq/MCTI/CT-Sade N176; 53/2022 ā COVID Longa, the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) grant call CAPES EPIDEMIAS 09/2020, and Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento CientĆfico e Tecnológico (FUNCAP) Brazilian funding agencies.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisherās note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AlemannoF.HoudayerE.ParmaA.SpinaA.Del FornoA.ScatoliniA.et al. (2021). COVID-19 cognitive deficits after respiratory assistance in the subacute phase: a COVID rehabilitation unit experience. PLoS ONE16, e0246590. 10.1371/journal.pone.0246590
2
AzevedoO. G. R.BolickD. T.RocheJ. K.PinkertonR. F.LimaA. A. M.VitekM. P.et al. (2014). Apolipoprotein e plays a key role against cryptosporidial infection in transgenic undernourished mice. PLoS ONE9, e89562. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089562
3
BaigA. M. (2021). Chronic COVID syndrome: need for an appropriate medical terminology for long-COVID and COVID long-haulers. J. Med. Virol. 93, 624. 10.1002/jmv.26624
4
BalesK. R.VerinaT.DodelR. C.DuY.AltstielL.BenderM.et al. (1997). Lack of apolipoprotein E dramatically reduces amyloid β-peptide deposition. Nat. Gen. 17, 263ā264. 10.1038/ng1197-263
5
BoylesJ. K.PitasR. E.WilsonE.MahleyR. W.TaylorJ. M. (1985). Apolipoprotein E associated with astrocytic glia of the central nervous system and with nonmyelinating glia of the peripheral nervous system. J. Clin. Invest. 76, 1501ā1513. 10.1172/JCI112130
6
Calderón-GarcidueƱasL.JewellsV.Galaz-MontoyaC.van ZundertB.PĆ©rez-CalatayudA.Ascencio-FerrelE.et al. (2016). Interactive and additive influences of Gender, BMI and Apolipoprotein 4 on cognition in children chronically exposed to high concentrations of PM2, 5. and ozone. APOE 4 females are at highest risk in Mexico City. Environ. Res. 150, 411ā422. 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.026
7
Dahlgren GandM. W. (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Institute of Future studies. Available online at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6472456.pdf (accessed May 12, 2023).
8
EricksonM. A.LogsdonA. F.RheaE. M.HansenK. M.HoldenS. J.BanksW. A.et al. (2023). Blood-brain barrier penetration of non-replicating SARS-CoV-2 and S1 variants of concern induce neuroinflammation which is accentuated in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Brain Behav. Immun. 109, 251ā268. 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.01.010
9
Espinosa-SalinasI.ColmenarejoG.FernĆ”ndez-DĆazC. M.Gómezd. e.CedrónMMartinezJARegleroGet al. (2022). Potential protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection by APOE rs7412 polymorphism. Sci. Rep.12, 4. 10.1038/s41598-022-10923-4
10
EwbankD. C. A. (2002). multistate model of the genetic risk of Alzheimer's disease. Exp. Aging Res. 28, 477ā99. 10.1080/03610730290103096
11
FAO IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. (2022). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022: Repurposing Food and Agricultural Policies to Make Healthy Diets More Affordable. Rome: FAO.10.4060/cc0639en
12
FarrerL. A.CupplesL. A.HainesJ. L.HymanB.KukullW. A.MayeuxR.et al. (1997). Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 278, 1349. 10.1001/jama.278.16.1349
13
GhoshK.ChakrabortyA. S.MogM. (2021). Prevalence of diarrhoea among under five children in India and its contextual determinants: a geo-spatial analysis. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health12, 100813. 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100813
14
GiauV.Van, BagyinszkyE.AnS. S. A.KimS. Y. (2015). Role of apolipoprotein E in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropsychiatric Dis. Treat. 11, 1723ā1737. 10.2147/NDT.S84266
15
GilmartinA. A.PetriW. A. (2015). Exploring the role of environmental enteropathy in malnutrition, infant development and oral vaccine response. philosophical transactions of the royal society B. Biol. Sci. 370, 143. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0143
16
GƶritzC.MauchD. H.NƤglerK.PfriegerF. W. (2002). Role of glia-derived cholesterol in synaptogenesis: new revelations in the synapse-glia affair. J. Physiol. Paris96, 1. 10.1016/S0928-4257(02)00014-1
17
GoyalA.KushwahP. S.AgrawalN.PathakS. (2023). APOE4: a culprit for the vulnerability of COVID-19 in Alzheimer's patients. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 20, 612. 10.2174/1567202620666230202140612
18
GuerrantR. L.DeboerM. D.MooreS. R.ScharfR. J.LimaA. A. M. (2013). The impoverished gutāA triple burden of diarrhoea, stunting and chronic disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 239. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.239
19
Har-PazI.ArieliE.MoranA. (2021). ApoE4 attenuates cortical neuronal activity in young behaving apoE4 rats. Neurobiol. Dis. 155, 5373. 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105373
20
HonarmandK.LalliR. S.PriestapF.ChenJ. L.McIntyreC. W.OwenA. M.et al. (2020). Natural history of cognitive impairment in critical illness survivors a systematic review. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. Am. Thoracic Soc. 202193ā201. 10.1164/rccm.201904-0816CI
21
HuangY. W. A.ZhouB.WernigM.SüdhofT. C. (2017). ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4 differentially stimulate APP transcription and Aβ secretion. Cell168, 427ā441.e21. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.044
22
JosephsonA.KilicT.MichlerJ. D. (2021). Socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19 in low-income countries. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 557ā565. 10.1038/s41562-021-01096-7
23
KuoC. L.PillingL. C.AtkinsJ. L.MasoliJ. A. H.DelgadoJ.KuchelG. A.et al. (2020). APOE e4 genotype predicts severe COVID-19 in the UK biobank community cohort. J. Gerontol. 17, 2231ā2232. 10.1093/gerona/glaa131
24
LawranceE. L.ThompsonR.Newberry Le VayJ.PageL.JenningsN. (2022). The impact of climate change on mental health and emotional wellbeing: a narrative review of current evidence, and its implications. Int. Rev. Psychiatry34, 443ā498. 10.1080/09540261.2022.2128725
25
LiP.YinY. L.LiD.KimW. S.WuG. (2007). Amino acids and immune function. Br. J. Nutri. 98, 237ā252. 10.1017/S000711450769936X
26
LiuC. C.KanekiyoT.XuH.BuG. (2013). Apolipoprotein e and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 9, 106ā18. 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263
27
LiuM.BianC.ZhangJ.WenF. (2014). Apolipoprotein e gene polymorphism and Alzheimer's disease in Chinese population: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 4, 4383. 10.1038/srep04383
28
MahleyR. W.RallS. C. (2000). Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 1, 507. 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.507
29
MaturaS.PrvulovicD.JurcoaneA.HartmannD.MillerJ.ScheibeM.et al. (2014). Differential effects of the ApoE4 genotype on brain structure and function. Neuroimage89, 81ā91. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.042
30
MitterS. S.OriĆ”R. B.KvalsundM. P.PamplonaP.JoventinoE. S.MotaR. M. S.et al. (2012). Apolipoprotein E4 influences growth and cognitive responses to micronutrient supplementation in shantytown children from northeast Brazil. Clinics67, 11ā8. 10.6061/clinics/2012(01)03
31
NalbandianA.SehgalK.GuptaA.MadhavanM. V.McGroderC.StevensJ. S.et al. (2021). Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat. Med. 27, 601ā15. 10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
32
NantegeR.KajobaD.DdamuliraC.NdoboliF.NdungutseD. (2022). Prevalence and factors associated with diarrheal diseases among children below five years in selected slum settlements in Entebbe municipality, Wakiso district, Uganda. BMC Pediatr. 22, 2. 10.1186/s12887-022-03448-2
33
O'MahoneyL. L.RoutenA.GilliesC.EkezieW.WelfordA.ZhangA.et al. (2023). The prevalence and long-term health effects of Long Covid among hospitalised and non-hospitalised populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine55, 762. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101762
34
OriĆ”R. B.PatrickP. D.OriĆ”M. O. B.LorntzB.ThompsonM. R.AzevedoO. G. R.et al. (2010). ApoE polymorphisms and diarrheal outcomes in Brazilian shanty town children. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 43, 249ā256. 10.1590/S0100-879X2010007500003
35
PendleburyS. T.RothwellP. M. (2019). Incidence and prevalence of dementia associated with transient ischaemic attack and stroke: analysis of the population-based Oxford vascular study. Lancet Neurol. 18, 248ā58. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30442-3
36
PinkertonR.OriƔR. B.LimaA. A. M.RogawskiE. T.OriƔM. O. B.PatrickP. D.et al. (2016). Early childhood diarrhea predicts cognitive delays in later childhood independently of malnutrition. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 95, 1004. 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0150
37
SartoriA. C.VanceD. E.SlaterL. Z.CroweM. (2012). The impact of inflammation on cognitive function in older adults: Implications for healthcare practice and research. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 44, 206ā217. 10.1097/JNN.0b013e3182527690
38
TarekeA. A.EnyewE. B.TakeleB. A. (2022). Pooled prevalence and associated factors of diarrhea among under-five years children in East Africa: a multilevel logistic regression analysis. PLoS ONE17, 4559. 10.1371/journal.pone.0264559
39
Tavares-JĆŗniorJ. W. L.de SouzaA. C. C.BorgesJ. W. P.OliveiraD. N.Siqueira-NetoJ. I.Sobreira-NetoM. A.et al. (2022a). COVID-19 associated cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Cortex152, 77ā97. 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.04.006
40
Tavares-JĆŗniorJ. W. L.OliveiraD. N.da SilvaJ. B. S.FeitosaW. L. Q.SousaA. V. M.CunhaL. C. V.et al. (2022b). Long-covid cognitive impairment: cognitive assessment and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotyping correlation in a Brazilian cohort. Front. Psychiatry13, 7583. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.947583
41
ThakurK. T.MillerE. H.GlendinningM. D.Al-DalahmahO.BanuM. A.BoehmeA. K.et al. (2021). COVID-19 neuropathology at Columbia university irving medical center/New York presbyterian hospital. Brain144, 2696ā2708. 10.1093/brain/awab148
42
TranT. T. T.CorsiniS.KellingrayL.HegartyC.Le GallG.NarbadA.et al. (2019). APOE genotype influences the gut microbiome structure and function in humans and mice: relevance for Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. FASEB J. 33, 8221. 10.1096/fj.201900071R
43
TrumbleB. C.StieglitzJ.BlackwellA. D.AllayeeH.BeheimB.FinchC. E.et al. (2017). Apolipoprotein E4 is associated with improved cognitive function in Amazonian forager-horticulturalists with a high parasite burden. FASEB J.31, 84. 10.1096/fj.201601084R
44
Tshala-KatumbayD.MwanzaJ. C.RohlmanD. S.MaestreG.OriaR. B. A. (2015). global perspective on the influence of environmental exposures on the nervous system. Nature527, e16034. 10.1038/nature16034
45
TuricD.FisherP. J.PlominR.OwenM. J. (2001). No association between apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and general cognitive ability in children. Neurosci. Lett. 299, 1ā2. 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01789-4
46
WangC.ZhangM.GarciaG.TianE.CuiQ.ChenX.et al. (2021). ApoE-isoform-dependent SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism and cellular response. Stem Cell. 28, 331ā342.e5. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.12.018
47
WangG.ChenZ.BartellT.WangX. (2014). Early life origins of metabolic syndrome: the role of environmental toxicants. Curr. Environ. Health Reports. 1, 6. 10.1007/s40572-013-0004-6
48
WHO (2017). Double-Duty Actions. Policy Brief. Geneva: World Health Organization.
49
WHO (2020). The Top 10 Causes of Death - Factsheet. WHO Reports. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
50
World Bank (2022). Poverty and Shared Prosperity: Correcting Course. The World Bank. Available online at: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/101596./978-1-4648-1893-6 (accessed May 3, 2023).
51
WrightR. O.HuH.SilvermanE. K.TsaihS. W.SchwartzJ.BellingerD.et al. (2003). Apolipoprotein E genotype predicts 24-month bayley scales infant development score. Pediatr. Res. 54, e53818. 10.1203/01.PDR.0000090927.53818.DE
52
WuH.HuangQ.YuZ.WuH.ZhongZ. (2020). The SNPs rs429358 and rs7412 of APOE gene are association with cerebral infarction but not SNPs rs2306283 and rs4149056 of SLCO1B1 gene in southern Chinese Hakka population. Lipids Health Dis. 19, 4. 10.1186/s12944-020-01379-4
53
ZhangH.ShaoL.LinZ.LongQ. X.YuanH.CaiL.et al. (2022). APOE interacts with ACE2 inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry and inflammation in COVID-19 patients. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7, 4. 10.1038/s41392-022-01118-4
Summary
Keywords
long COVID-19, Alzheimer's disease, antagonistic pleiotropy, apolipoprotein E, malnutrition, poverty
Citation
Ciurleo GCV, Tavares-JĆŗnior JWL, Vieira CMAG, Braga-Neto P and OriĆ” RB (2023) Do APOE4 and long COVID-19 increase the risk for neurodegenerative diseases in adverse environments and poverty?. Front. Neurosci. 17:1229073. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1229073
Received
30 May 2023
Accepted
07 August 2023
Published
24 August 2023
Volume
17 - 2023
Edited by
Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira, Elysian Clinic, Brazil
Reviewed by
Narlon C. Boa Sorte Silva, University of British Columbia, Canada
Updates
Copyright
Ā© 2023 Ciurleo, Tavares-JĆŗnior, Vieira, Braga-Neto and OriĆ”.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Reinaldo B. OriĆ” oria@ufc.br
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.